Re: [newbie] Pine 4.30 (was Aurora)
Sounds like a plan Paul. I'm wondering though if their idea of threading and ours are somewhat different. -- Mark / * Sometimes it becomes necessary to rock the boat * in order to get the rats up from below decks * so they can be kicked over the side and drowned! * * REGISTERED LINUX USER # 182496 */ *REPLY SEPERATOR* On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 Paul had this to say! On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Mark Weaver wrote: :)... yeah...I saw that part, but even after I turned it on I still didn't see any evidence of threading going on. Thats why I thought I was missing something. Hmmm... I don't use the feature... I tried it just now, and after switching it on and going to another mailbox, Pine just ended itself. Very interesting behaviour. Tried several options, still the same. I cannot help you with this, perhaps you can write to the Pine developers. Their e-mail address is on the Pine page at http://www.washington.edu/pine I once wrote to them, and they do respond, it can take a while. Good luck Paul
Re: [newbie] Pine 4.30 (was Aurora)
ok...I've got it working now, but I still don't see the threading working at all. Maybe I'm missing something here, but what should I be looking for? Mark / * Sometimes it becomes necessary to rock the boat * in order to get the rats up from below decks * so they can be kicked over the side and drowned! * * REGISTERED LINUX USER # 182496 */ *REPLY SEPERATOR* On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 Mark Weaver had this to say! Paul, I wasn't able to get any of that working in 4.30. All that was working was the basic functionality of Pine. No colors, no threading...it was pretty plain vanilla. I wasn't able to get it to compile either. That was strange. I installed the precompiled binaries. I'm glad I saved the old binaries as renaming, cause I was able to reinstall them quickly. So, what things did you have to do to set everything up to get it working the way you wanted? -- Mark / * Sometimes it becomes necessary to rock the boat * in order to get the rats up from below decks * so they can be kicked over the side and drowned! * * REGISTERED LINUX USER # 182496 */ *REPLY SEPERATOR* On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 Paul had this to say! On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Roger Sherman wrote: Good thing that I did not trash this like all things about Aurora... I see from your sig line that you've a different version of Pine than normal. Is there a new version of Pine out? Are there are reasons or features in it that would warrent moving from 4.21 to 4.30? I love Pine and there are a few things I've been looking forward to finding in Pine one day. Like threading and a few others... Thats funny, Mark...I was going to ask you about that. I was on the Pine homepage, and saw the updates, and was wondering what you thought of them... Pine 4.30 works fine for me. There are a few things I have not worked out yet. I pulled the source tarball from the site and compiled it myself. Threading works pretty good. As you may have seen in another mail, there was a little problem with colors, but that settled itself easily. What I am wondering about is how to get URL's highlighted. 4.21 (which came as RPM) did so, but I guess I either miss something, or forgot some option while compiling the thing. All in all I like it :) Paul
Re: [newbie] Pine 4.30 (was Aurora)
:)... yeah...I saw that part, but even after I turned it on I still didn't see any evidence of threading going on. Thats why I thought I was missing something. -- Mark / * Sometimes it becomes necessary to rock the boat * in order to get the rats up from below decks * so they can be kicked over the side and drowned! * * REGISTERED LINUX USER # 182496 */ *REPLY SEPERATOR* On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 Paul had this to say! On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Mark Weaver wrote: ok...I've got it working now, but I still don't see the threading working at all. Maybe I'm missing something here, but what should I be looking for? Mark, in Setup - Config, scroll all the way down to: sort-key = SetSort Options --- -- ( ) Subject ( ) Arrival ( ) From ( ) To ( ) Cc (*) Date ( ) siZe ( ) OrderedSubj ( ) scorE ( ) tHread == There it is. Paul
[newbie] Pine 4.30 (was Aurora)
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Roger Sherman wrote: Good thing that I did not trash this like all things about Aurora... I see from your sig line that you've a different version of Pine than normal. Is there a new version of Pine out? Are there are reasons or features in it that would warrent moving from 4.21 to 4.30? I love Pine and there are a few things I've been looking forward to finding in Pine one day. Like threading and a few others... Thats funny, Mark...I was going to ask you about that. I was on the Pine homepage, and saw the updates, and was wondering what you thought of them... Pine 4.30 works fine for me. There are a few things I have not worked out yet. I pulled the source tarball from the site and compiled it myself. Threading works pretty good. As you may have seen in another mail, there was a little problem with colors, but that settled itself easily. What I am wondering about is how to get URL's highlighted. 4.21 (which came as RPM) did so, but I guess I either miss something, or forgot some option while compiling the thing. All in all I like it :) Paul -- Not: live and let live But: live and help to live http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208 - Registered Linux User 174403 Linux Mandrake 7.2 - Pine 4.30
Re: [newbie] Pine 4.30 (was Aurora)
Paul, I wasn't able to get any of that working in 4.30. All that was working was the basic functionality of Pine. No colors, no threading...it was pretty plain vanilla. I wasn't able to get it to compile either. That was strange. I installed the precompiled binaries. I'm glad I saved the old binaries as renaming, cause I was able to reinstall them quickly. So, what things did you have to do to set everything up to get it working the way you wanted? -- Mark / * Sometimes it becomes necessary to rock the boat * in order to get the rats up from below decks * so they can be kicked over the side and drowned! * * REGISTERED LINUX USER # 182496 */ *REPLY SEPERATOR* On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 Paul had this to say! On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Roger Sherman wrote: Good thing that I did not trash this like all things about Aurora... I see from your sig line that you've a different version of Pine than normal. Is there a new version of Pine out? Are there are reasons or features in it that would warrent moving from 4.21 to 4.30? I love Pine and there are a few things I've been looking forward to finding in Pine one day. Like threading and a few others... Thats funny, Mark...I was going to ask you about that. I was on the Pine homepage, and saw the updates, and was wondering what you thought of them... Pine 4.30 works fine for me. There are a few things I have not worked out yet. I pulled the source tarball from the site and compiled it myself. Threading works pretty good. As you may have seen in another mail, there was a little problem with colors, but that settled itself easily. What I am wondering about is how to get URL's highlighted. 4.21 (which came as RPM) did so, but I guess I either miss something, or forgot some option while compiling the thing. All in all I like it :) Paul
