Re: U.S. politics in Linux? Was: Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-12 Thread bones
ABM:
---
The dissolution of the former Soviet Union during the autumn and winter of 
1991 required the United States to re-evaluate the bilateral treaties that 
had existed between the Soviet Union and itself, including the ABM Treaty. 
(1) Both President Bush and President Clinton operated on the general 
principle that the treaty rights and obligations of the former Soviet Union 
had passed to the successor States []

As the Legal Adviser to the State Department during the Bush Administration 
explained,

[a]s an operating principle, agreements between the United States and the 
USSR that were in force at the time of the dissolution of the Soviet Union 
have been presumed to continue in force with respect to the former republics. 
What is the legal basis for adopting this position? Except for the Baltic 
states, which the United States never recognized as part of the Soviet Union, 
we regarded the emergence of Russia and the other former republics to have 
stemmed from what was essentially the complete breakup of the Soviet Union. 

[AND MOST IMPORTANTLY:]
Thus, continuity of treaty relations is supported by our reading of state 
practice, and by policy considerations underlying this rule. Perhaps most 
importantly, however, continuity has been supported by the republics 
themselves, who affirmed this approach in the Alma Ata Declaration when they 
guaranteed the fulfillment of international obligations stemming from the 
treasties and agreements of the former U.S.S.R.[...]

[comments in Brackets made by me]
link: http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/abmjq.htm


apart from that:
Ban of B/C Weapons:
--
Monday May 21, 2001

The Bush administration has found another international agreement to spurn. 
This time it's a draft agreement to enforce a 1972 treaty banning biological 
weapons, an agreement backed by Britain and other European countries.

The protocol took six years to negotiate and established measures to monitor 
the ban on biological weapons. It was a follow-up to the 1972 treaty, 
ratified by 143 nations, which bans the development, production and 
possession of biological weapons.

link: http://www.guardian.co.uk/bush/story/0,7369,494257,00.html



On Friday 10 January 2003 06:39 pm, Kelley Jernigan wrote:
 Why is it that people miss that the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty was
 made with a country that no longer exists?
 Any treaties that are made with any country that ceases to exist are null
 and void automatically.
 
 I cut the rest 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: U.S. politics in Linux? Was: Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-10 Thread Kelley Jernigan
What a lot of nonsence. If it were about oil the Best thing the USA could do 
is lift all of the sanctions. Then the US could have all the Iraqi oil it 
wanted to buy.

JKJ

On Monday 06 January 2003 8:22 pm, Todd Franklin wrote:
 What gets me is that the whole Iraq thing is over the oil.  There's
 still no conclusive proof that they have weapons of mass destruction,
 but we know for sure they have vast amounts of oil.  In fact, the Bush
 administration has already divided it up amongst the oil companies.
  (primarily american I'm sure)  It makes me want to puke.  We know North
 Korea is making weapons-grade plutonium right now, but since there's no
 oil there, the Bush administration has decided  to use diplomacy
 instead of bombing them.  Hmm double standard?  And what ever happened
 to Bin Laden anyway?  Why haven't they gotten him?  Most advanced
 military in the world can't find one guy?  We've got sattelites that can
 find oil miles deep, but can't find one terrorist in a cave!  GR!
 Sorry about the rant, but here I sit in the midwestern US, I was layed
 off in April 02 and I can't find a job, my unemployment has been cut
 off, the economy is going to hell, and this f***ing moronic
 administration is slowly taking away our rights.  Pretty soon the only
 US constitutional right left will be to own a gun so we can blow our own
 heads off.

 Todd

 Carroll Grigsby wrote:
 On Sunday 05 January 2003 05:28 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
 On Sunday 05 Jan 2003 6:38 pm, Dennis Myers wrote:
 What I can't figure out is who here in the US wants a world empire and
 why they think it's a good idea.
 
 Ain't that true the world over?  How many people really do?
 
 I raised 5 kids and that is all the squabling
 I care to endure.  I also don't feel threatened by anyone else, other
 than terrorists and they can be homegrown just as easily as from
 somewhere else. We all need to just chill, kick back with a Bud or
 Guiness or what ever your taste may be and watch Gilligan's Island for
 60 hours straight. That would cure a lot of world funk. :  )
 
 Unfortunately two or three idiots can turn a world upside down.
 
 Anne
 
 ...and 60 hours of Gilligan is certain to reduce anyone to a babbling
  idiot.
 
 (I think we've set a new list record for simultaneous OT threads -- three
  by my count. Oh well, it's the weekend. Damn glad I don't pay by the
  minute, though.)
 
 -- cmg
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

-- 
J. Kelley Jernigan




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: U.S. politics in Linux? Was: Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-10 Thread Kelley Jernigan
Why is it that people miss that the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty was 
made with a country that no longer exists?
Any treaties that are made with any country that ceases to exist are null and 
void automatically.

JKJ  


On Thursday 09 January 2003 10:53 pm, bones wrote:
 Hell, everybody has strong feelings about this subject. I have resisted
 long but this post is really way beyond.

 Imagine:

 There are two countries, X and Y.

 - X has made war to two other countries (to one of them with strong support
 by Y) and shot rockets against a third, it is _suspected_ to have weapons
 of mass destruction.

 (Todays news tell me though that it is _not_ likely they do, or even did -
 is the news in america different?)

 - Y is proven to _have_ weapons of mass destruction, is the only country
 that has actually used it and is willing to do so again. (see below: [1]).
 Has recently one-sidedly _broken_ the ABM treaty with russia to reduce
 nuclear weapons on both sides (Y is now stronger so the treaty is
 obsolete). [2] Y possess biological/chemical weapons and has recently
 ignored another international treaty they signed in 1972 that bans b+c
 weapons [4] . They have repeatedly attacked and invaded other
 (democratically elected) countries. [3]

 --- Which one is more dangerous? ---


 Do you sometimes question yourself and your position? How comes your are so
 self-righteous?

 You are with us or against us what a shit! I am against Bush _and_
 Fundamentalists, because they are basically the same to me.

 Some people may have hurt your feelings - well that's sad. But your country
 is going to _kill_ people - not just hurt their feelings.

 Is it better to kill than to cope with opposing views and maybe discover
 that you are wrong?


 p.

 But well it _is_ true that this is the place to discuss opposing views
 about KDE and Gnome  I just couldn't let it stand like this.
 --
 [1]
 The Pentagon's newly revised, secret-but-leaked nuclear posture review
 lists not just one or two, but at least seven nations that may conceivably
 qualify as targets for nuclear attack by the United States. The potential
 bull's-eyes include not only the usual axis of evil-also known as Iran,
 Iraq and North Korea-but Libya and Syria, as well as our friends in China
 and Russia.
 government site:
 http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/arms/stories/01121302.htm (and)
 bbc :http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1707812.stm

 [2]
 The United States has given Russia formal notice that it will withdraw
 from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in six months, President Bush
 said December 13.
 links: same as above

 [3]
 IRAN 1953
 CIA directs overthrow of elected left-leaning government, installs Shah.

 INDONESIA 1965
 Army coup assisted to an unknown degree by CIA; left-leaning elected
 government toppled; between 250,000 to 1,000,000 lives lost.

 CHILE 1973
 CIA-backed coup ousts elected leftist president; rightist dictator
 installed.

 Turkey
 By means of repetitive coups the US-backed army has ousted the
 democratically elected parties for several times.

 http://www.countries.com/messageboard/messages/688.html
 (or)
 http://www.neravt.com/left/invade.htm

 [4]
 The Bush administration has found another international agreement to
 spurn. This time it's a draft agreement to enforce a 1972 treaty banning
 biological weapons, an agreement backed by Britain and other European
 countries.

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/bush/story/0,7369,494257,00.html

-- 
J. Kelley Jernigan




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: U.S. politics in Linux? Was: Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-09 Thread bones
Hell, everybody has strong feelings about this subject. I have resisted long 
but this post is really way beyond.

Imagine:

There are two countries, X and Y. 

- X has made war to two other countries (to one of them with strong support by 
Y) and shot rockets against a third, it is _suspected_ to have weapons of 
mass destruction. 

(Todays news tell me though that it is _not_ likely they do, or even did - is 
the news in america different?)

- Y is proven to _have_ weapons of mass destruction, is the only country that 
has actually used it and is willing to do so again. (see below: [1]). Has 
recently one-sidedly _broken_ the ABM treaty with russia to reduce nuclear 
weapons on both sides (Y is now stronger so the treaty is obsolete). [2] Y 
possess biological/chemical weapons and has recently ignored another 
international treaty they signed in 1972 that bans b+c weapons [4] . They 
have repeatedly attacked and invaded other (democratically elected) 
countries. [3] 

--- Which one is more dangerous? ---


Do you sometimes question yourself and your position? How comes your are so 
self-righteous? 

You are with us or against us what a shit! I am against Bush _and_ 
Fundamentalists, because they are basically the same to me.

Some people may have hurt your feelings - well that's sad. But your country is 
going to _kill_ people - not just hurt their feelings. 

Is it better to kill than to cope with opposing views and maybe discover that 
you are wrong?


p.

But well it _is_ true that this is the place to discuss opposing views about 
KDE and Gnome  I just couldn't let it stand like this.
--
[1]
The Pentagon's newly revised, secret-but-leaked nuclear posture review 
lists not just one or two, but at least seven nations that may conceivably 
qualify as targets for nuclear attack by the United States. The potential 
bull's-eyes include not only the usual axis of evil-also known as Iran, 
Iraq and North Korea-but Libya and Syria, as well as our friends in China 
and Russia.
government site: http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/arms/stories/01121302.htm
(and)
bbc :http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1707812.stm

[2]
The United States has given Russia formal notice that it will withdraw from 
the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in six months, President Bush said 
December 13.
links: same as above

[3] 
IRAN 1953
CIA directs overthrow of elected left-leaning government, installs Shah.

INDONESIA 1965
Army coup assisted to an unknown degree by CIA; left-leaning elected 
government toppled; between 250,000 to 1,000,000 lives lost.

CHILE 1973
CIA-backed coup ousts elected leftist president; rightist dictator installed.

Turkey
By means of repetitive coups the US-backed army has ousted the democratically 
elected parties for several times.

http://www.countries.com/messageboard/messages/688.html
(or) 
http://www.neravt.com/left/invade.htm

[4]
The Bush administration has found another international agreement to spurn. 
This time it's a draft agreement to enforce a 1972 treaty banning biological 
weapons, an agreement backed by Britain and other European countries.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/bush/story/0,7369,494257,00.html



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: U.S. politics in Linux? Was: Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-09 Thread Dennis Myers
On Thursday 09 January 2003 06:15 pm, Brandon Vanderberg wrote:
  Some people may have hurt your feelings - well that's sad. But your
  country is going to _kill_ people - not just hurt their feelings.
 
  Is it better to kill than to cope with opposing views and maybe discover
  that you are wrong?

 Bones,
 Nice post. I'm sure there will be sweeping policy changes and a flood of
 apologies issued from Washington very soon.

 Until then, can we drop the subject at least on this list? It's getting
 real old.
 Pretty please?
 I'll be your best friend. ;)

 Feel free to contact me personally and flame my government to your
 heart's content. I'm also on the #Mandrake-offtopic IRC channel at
 freenode.net.

 ~Brandon
I'll be everyone's second best friend! Please?
-- 
Dennis M.  linux user # 180842


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: U.S. politics in Linux? Was: Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-08 Thread RichardA
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 23:04, Dennis  Sue wrote:
 I have patiently waited for this ridiculous diatribe to die off. I have 
 listened as you people have insulted MY country, MY President, My people. 
 Now, I've had enough, And I'm going to have MY say. Some probably won't like 
 what I have to say, How unfortunate for you. I have not enjoyed much of what 
 you have said.

I've seen people get slapped down for wanting to keep this list to its 
purpose, but all we have in common is an interest in an OS - nothing else.

The which-star-trek-actor-do-you-fancy thread was tedious, but this one is 
downright nasty.

The web is full of places to talk about which race you hate most, and how the 
US saves the world on a daily basis. Don't do it here.

Richard


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: U.S. politics in Linux? Was: Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-07 Thread Daryl Johnson
A quick check on my own server gave me 352 newsgroups that included the word 
politics in the title... some scope there I would suggest  ;o)

regards

Daryl

On Tuesday 07 Jan 2003 10:40 am, John Richard Smith wrote:
 Milos Prudek wrote:

[...]
  I think that this list is intended for discussion about Mandrake Linux.
 
  While I appreciate your opinion and actually agree with most points,
  in my opinion this list is not appropriate to discuss politics.

  John Richard Smith wrote:
 That is quite correct , I tend to agree , but people are very worried
 about this
 situation, little scope to discuss these things really exists, and in
 this instance
 at least , here is an opportunity .
 John

-- 
If God is perfect, why did He create discontinuous functions?



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: U.S. politics in Linux? Was: Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-07 Thread FemmeFatale
At 10:29 AM 1/7/2003 +0100, you wrote:



John Richard Smith wrote:

Our Prime minister Tony Blair is way out on a limb.There is little support
for an Iraqi war.


I think that this list is intended for discussion about Mandrake Linux.

While I appreciate your opinion and actually agree with most points, in my 
opinion this list is not appropriate to discuss politics.

--
Milos Prudek

hate to agree, but i do

heh... politics/abortion/religion=not listable stuff really... gets too 
messy :)

-
FemmeFatale

Good Decisions You boss Made:
We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
character from Peanuts.

- Source: Dilbert



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: U.S. politics in Linux? Was: Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-07 Thread Dennis Sue
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 04:20 am, John Richard Smith wrote:
 Our Prime minister Tony Blair is way out on a limb.There is little support
 for an Iraqi war.

I have patiently waited for this ridiculous diatribe to die off. I have 
listened as you people have insulted MY country, MY President, My people. 
Now, I've had enough, And I'm going to have MY say. Some probably won't like 
what I have to say, How unfortunate for you. I have not enjoyed much of what 
you have said.

 It has nothing to do with weapons of mass destruction, that's an excuse.

Really ? Let's go back to June 7,1981 When Israel blew up a Iraqi nuclear 
reactor. The world screamed for their blood once again. The Israeli's claimed 
that it was a preemptive strike. Menachem Begin spoke The Iraqi's were 
preparing atomic bombs to drop on the children of Israel, Another holocaust 
would have happened in the history of the Jewish people.  Never again, 
NEVER AGAIN! Tell your freinds, Tell anybody you meet, we shall defend our 
people  with all the means at our disposal. Their critics would hear none of 
that, No it was just the hateful agressive Jews at it again, Just haters, 
probably Conservatives too. A  U.N. sanction was demanded by Secretary 
General Chedli Klibi, of the Arab League.  The Russians lined up with the 
Arabs,As did the British, screaming for  vengence, Screaming for sanctions. 
The U.N. condemned the Israeli attack. Days later, Israel began releasing 
documents, Here is some of what was released : 13 feet beneath the reactor, 
The Iraqi's had been maintaining a secret installation for use in developing 
an atomic weapon. They had stockpiled 200 tons of natural plutonium . They 
were indeed developing weapons of mass destruction. That is an undisputable 
FACT. Not an opinion, not a feeling, not an emotional let's all just get 
along and pretend it's ok, a FACT.

 It has everything to do with the American Governments Middle East Foreign
 Policy, which is stimulating terrorism  and has been for some time,

America's sin that stimulates terrorism is this - Supporting Israel. As long 
as we support Israel then we will be hated by the Arab nations. Our only 
mistake was during the Iran / Iraq war assuming that the enemy of our enemy 
is our friend. They are not, never have been, never will be. If not for 
Israel, Then because we are not Islamic. When the Arabs have no common enemy 
to fight, They kill each other. As much as we hear of the plight of the 
Palastinians, Which of those nations have ever raised a finger to help their 
brother Palistine ?  They throw the Palastinians out of their countries. Only 
using them as pawns against Israel.
When Israel offered the Palastinians settlements, and money They were told not 
to accept, To do so would cost them their lives. Yassar Arafat led attacks 
against HIS people, The ones who accepted land, and money. Yassar Arafat 
killed HIS brothers for wanting peace.

and an
 invasion of Iraq right now will confirm in the minds of evey Arab just
 how much they have to fear.

And what are these 9/11 , School bombing  type of attacks suppose to stimulate 
? Fear. So you can quit whining about the poor , innocent Arabs. Especially 
when the cowardly little bastards run into an Israeli school and blow up 
innocent civilians.
 They are all in bed together on this terror. It is how cowards fight. It's 
all they know, nothing of honor, Nothing of Integrity. 

They are a detestable people hell bent on your destruction. They do not want 
peace. And I do not want peace at any cost. Why is it that liberals generally 
want peace, no matter what the price ? Is it  worth your dignity ? Your self 
respect ?  Your silence to wrongs committed against an innocent people ? What 
wouldn't you give for it ? Apparantly your life.

 The middle east is the worlds oil well,

Not after America comes in, It's called the spoils of war, and it then belongs 
to US.
 invading Iraq at this time and
 under current circumstances is a 10 year blue touch paper to ww3 with
 china. John

At the moment, The only thing China really has on us in manpower.   They can 
send them out like ants, Lose 20 million like nothing. That's why we develop 
weapons.
And besides, What are we suppose to do ? Cower in the corner like most of the 
world did some 60 years ago ?
Oh no, We can't defend ourselves because somebody might beat us up , Or is 
it this instead  It just wouldn't be prudent ?
I've had my fill of people pissing on the one nation that has helped every 
other. We've put our blood, sweat, and tears into EVERY other nation on this 
planet and have been insulted for it. 
We are not perfect, we make mistakes. This just doesn't happen to be one of 
them.
And neither will taking out the next Arab nation.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: U.S. politics in Linux? Was: Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-07 Thread et
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 08:38 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
 On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 18:04, Dennis  Sue wrote:

 Well, Dennis  Sue, all I can say is that you've got your shite
 together. You got's my vote, I'll be watching email from this address
 much closer in the future.

 Btw, see what you think about this:

 Strategy of appeasement = NaziDrake
 a much deserved and post timely death for such OT threads as this, on a 
tech mailling list


 Heh.

 --LX

 P.S.  Funny how, during the last WW, the Allied symbol was a star, which
 is the same symbol as Mandrake carries now.  Conversely, if the beloved
 European appeasement strategy had been brought to fruition with Hitler,
 we would have a swastika symbol instead.

 Interesting how history impacts everything.  Like Mandrake.

  I have patiently waited for this ridiculous diatribe to die off. I have
  listened as you people have insulted MY country, MY President, My
  people. Now, I've had enough, And I'm going to have MY say. Some probably
  won't like what I have to say, How unfortunate for you. I have not
  enjoyed much of what you have said.
 
   It has nothing to do with weapons of mass destruction, that's an
   excuse.
 
  Really ? Let's go back to June 7,1981 When Israel blew up a Iraqi nuclear
  reactor. The world screamed for their blood once again. The Israeli's
  claimed that it was a preemptive strike. Menachem Begin spoke The
  Iraqi's were preparing atomic bombs to drop on the children of Israel,
  Another holocaust would have happened in the history of the Jewish
  people.  Never again, NEVER AGAIN! Tell your freinds, Tell anybody
  you meet, we shall defend our people  with all the means at our
  disposal. Their critics would hear none of that, No it was just the
  hateful agressive Jews at it again, Just haters, probably Conservatives
  too. A  U.N. sanction was demanded by Secretary General Chedli Klibi, of
  the Arab League.  The Russians lined up with the Arabs,As did the
  British, screaming for  vengence, Screaming for sanctions. The U.N.
  condemned the Israeli attack. Days later, Israel began releasing
  documents, Here is some of what was released : 13 feet beneath the
  reactor, The Iraqi's had been maintaining a secret installation for use
  in developing an atomic weapon. They had stockpiled 200 tons of natural
  plutonium . They were indeed developing weapons of mass destruction. That
  is an undisputable FACT. Not an opinion, not a feeling, not an emotional
  let's all just get along and pretend it's ok, a FACT.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-05 Thread Dennis Sue
Which is better KDE, or Gnome ?
Whichever one you like the most, and find to be the best for you.
That's the one that's better.
How about these questions instead :
Which is better:
1-  Linux with  the ability to use different desktops. Or windows with no such 
ability?
2- Linux with the ability to toggle through desktops. Or windows with no such 
ability?
3- Linux , because of the option to use different desktops, The ability to 
even ask this question. Or windows.
4- If everbody in the world farted at the same time, what would happen to the 
polar ice caps?
5-  If everbody in the world farted at the same time, And you just happened to 
light a match at that moment, Would it explode the entire world at once, Or 
simply set up a chain reaction?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-05 Thread mike
On Sunday 05 January 2003 01:37 am, you wrote:
 On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 23:22:43 -0500
 mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 snip

  I've noticed there is a lot of Red and Yellow in Linux...

 and green.

 Todd

Salut komrade!
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Michael Shinobi a.k.a. 'alfalfa'
Mandrake 8.2
Kernel-2.4.18-8.1mdk
Linux user #298896
Sun Jan 5 11:38:27 EST 2003
11:38am up 4 days, 13:49, 2 users, load average: 0.02, 0.02, 0.00
Homepage: http://micronuke.tripod.com/
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
A bachelor is a selfish, undeserving guy who has cheated some woman out of a 
divorce. -- Don Quinn


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



U.S. politics in Linux? Was: Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-05 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 03:27:07PM +1100, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
 On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 15:22, mike wrote:
 
  I've noticed there is a lot of Red and Yellow in Linux...
 
 ...and to think I moved to Australia to be away from US politics...I
 guess not...

Not that the U.S. seems intent on building a world empire, I suspect
everyone will have to deal with US politics.  Even places as remote
from technological civilization as Afghanistan!

Afghanistan uset to be the proverbial end-of-the-earth when I was little.


-- hendrik

 
 -- 
 Sun Jan  5 15:25:00 EST 2003
   3:25pm  up 18:33,  6 users,  load average: 0.73, 0.56, 0.56
 
 kuhn media australia - kma.0catch.com
 -
 stephen kuhn - katherine kuhn - berkeley, nsw, au
 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 icq: 5483808 - mobile: 0410-728-389
 -PC/Mac/Linux/Consulting/eMarketing-
 
  * linux user: 267497 * rh 7.3+ *
 
 Darth Vader:
   I find your lack of faith disturbing.
 

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: U.S. politics in Linux? Was: Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-05 Thread Dennis Myers
On Sunday 05 January 2003 12:08 pm, Hendrik Boom wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 03:27:07PM +1100, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
  On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 15:22, mike wrote:
   I've noticed there is a lot of Red and Yellow in Linux...
 
  ...and to think I moved to Australia to be away from US politics...I
  guess not...

 Not that the U.S. seems intent on building a world empire, I suspect
 everyone will have to deal with US politics.  Even places as remote
 from technological civilization as Afghanistan!

 Afghanistan uset to be the proverbial end-of-the-earth when I was little.


 -- hendrik

  --
  Sun Jan  5 15:25:00 EST 2003
3:25pm  up 18:33,  6 users,  load average: 0.73, 0.56, 0.56
 
  kuhn media australia - kma.0catch.com
  -
  stephen kuhn - katherine kuhn - berkeley, nsw, au
  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  icq: 5483808 - mobile: 0410-728-389
  -PC/Mac/Linux/Consulting/eMarketing-
  
   * linux user: 267497 * rh 7.3+ *
  
  Darth Vader:
  I find your lack of faith disturbing.
 
 
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
  Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
What I can't figure out is who here in the US wants a world empire and why 
they think it's a good idea.  I raised 5 kids and that is all the squabling I 
care to endure.  I also don't feel threatened by anyone else, other than 
terrorists and they can be homegrown just as easily as from somewhere else.  
We all need to just chill, kick back with a Bud or Guiness or what ever your 
taste may be and watch Gilligan's Island for 60 hours straight. That would 
cure a lot of world funk. :  )
-- 
Dennis M.  linux user # 180842



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-05 Thread FemmeFatale
At 11:38 AM 1/5/2003 -0500, you wrote:

On Sunday 05 January 2003 01:37 am, you wrote:
 On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 23:22:43 -0500
 mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 snip

  I've noticed there is a lot of Red and Yellow in Linux...

 and green.

 Todd

Salut komrade!
--


*likes electric blue...* But it doesn't exist in linux natively :(  *Sniff 
sniff*... not even KDE has it :(  The bastards!
-
FemmeFatale

Good Decisions You boss Made:
We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
character from Peanuts.

- Source: Dilbert



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Sunday 05 Jan 2003 9:23 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
 At 11:38 AM 1/5/2003 -0500, you wrote:
 On Sunday 05 January 2003 01:37 am, you wrote:
   On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 23:22:43 -0500
   mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   snip
  
I've noticed there is a lot of Red and Yellow in Linux...
  
   and green.
  
   Todd
 
 Salut komrade!
 --

 *likes electric blue...* But it doesn't exist in linux natively :(  *Sniff
 sniff*... not even KDE has it :(  The bastards!

Then you'd have loved the car I had before I retired - electric blue Toyota 
MR2 - 2-seat sports car, if you haven't seen one.  My pride and joy - so sad 
to give it up.

Anne


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-05 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 02:46, Dennis  Sue wrote:
 Which is better KDE, or Gnome ?
 Whichever one you like the most, and find to be the best for you.
 That's the one that's better.
 How about these questions instead :
 Which is better:

...sorry, I have to counter these:

 1-  Linux with  the ability to use different desktops. Or windows with no such 
 ability?

You can. Hoverdesk. DesktopX, Astonshell, Blackbox (believe it or not),
Geoshell, Darkstep,Chroma - and heaps more...

 2- Linux with the ability to toggle through desktops. Or windows with no such 
 ability?

You can. JSPager (free), MSVDM (with the XP powertoys), Hoverdesk,
ObjectDesktop, Desktop/X...

 3- Linux , because of the option to use different desktops, The ability to 
 even ask this question. Or windows..

Windows is popular only due to marketing. OS/2, BeOS, Desqview/X would
be around still if it wasn't for the mass marketing and choking of the
rest.

 4- If everbody in the world farted at the same time, what would happen to the 
 polar ice caps?

No - it would only stink. Badly.

 5-  If everbody in the world farted at the same time, And you just happened to 
 light a match at that moment, Would it explode the entire world at once, Or 
 simply set up a chain reaction?
 
Because it's basically methane, it diffuses too quickly. People farting
at the same time would most likely be standing up, hence giving the
gases released more ability to diffuse and become less inflammable.

-- 
Mon Jan  6 09:15:01 EST 2003
  9:15am  up 1 day, 12:23,  6 users,  load average: 0.24, 0.26, 0.21

kuhn media australia - kma.0catch.com
-
stephen kuhn - katherine kuhn - berkeley, nsw, au
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 5483808 - mobile: 0410-728-389
-PC/Mac/Linux/Consulting/eMarketing-

 * linux user: 267497 * rh 7.3+ *

The vigor of civilized societies is preserved by the widespread sense that high
aims are worth-while.  Vigorous societies harbor a certain extravagance of
objectives, so that men wander beyond the safe provision of personal
gratifications.  All strong interests easily become impersonal, the love of
a good job well done.  There is a sense of harmony about such an accomplishment,
the Peace brought by something worth-while.
- Alfred North Whitehead, 1963, in The History of Manned Space Flight


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: U.S. politics in Linux? Was: Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Sunday 05 Jan 2003 6:38 pm, Dennis Myers wrote:
 What I can't figure out is who here in the US wants a world empire and why
 they think it's a good idea.  

Ain't that true the world over?  How many people really do?

 I raised 5 kids and that is all the squabling
 I care to endure.  I also don't feel threatened by anyone else, other than
 terrorists and they can be homegrown just as easily as from somewhere else.
 We all need to just chill, kick back with a Bud or Guiness or what ever
 your taste may be and watch Gilligan's Island for 60 hours straight. That
 would cure a lot of world funk. :  )

Unfortunately two or three idiots can turn a world upside down.

Anne


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-05 Thread FemmeFatale
At 10:20 PM 1/5/2003 +, you wrote:



Then you'd have loved the car I had before I retired - electric blue Toyota
MR2 - 2-seat sports car, if you haven't seen one.  My pride and joy - so sad
to give it up.

Anne


I'm envious... I dont' drive nor do I own a car... neither by choice :P

heh must have been a sad day to give that up

-
FemmeFatale

Good Decisions You boss Made:
We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
character from Peanuts.

- Source: Dilbert




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-05 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 12:11, FemmeFatale wrote:
 At 10:20 PM 1/5/2003 +, you wrote:
 
 
 Then you'd have loved the car I had before I retired - electric blue Toyota
 MR2 - 2-seat sports car, if you haven't seen one.  My pride and joy - so sad
 to give it up.
 
 Anne
 
 I'm envious... I dont' drive nor do I own a car... neither by choice :P
 
 heh must have been a sad day to give that up
 
 -
 FemmeFatale

Wow - first woman to ever admit she cain't drive...(ducking)

-- 
Mon Jan  6 12:25:01 EST 2003
 12:25pm  up 1 day, 15:33,  6 users,  load average: 0.11, 0.19, 0.27

kuhn media australia - kma.0catch.com
-
stephen kuhn - katherine kuhn - berkeley, nsw, au
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 5483808 - mobile: 0410-728-389
-PC/Mac/Linux/Consulting/eMarketing-

 * linux user: 267497 * rh 7.3+ *

As flies to wanton boys are we to the gods; they kill us for their sport.
-- Shakespeare, King Lear


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-04 Thread mike
On Saturday 04 January 2003 07:45 pm, you wrote:
 This is off-topic, but a characterization of free software practices and
 sharing as more republican or libertarian in nature is also way off.
 Libertarians--which are really Republicans without a desire to regulate
 people's private practices (drug use, sexual practices)--are primarily
 concerned with the defense of private property from any state
 intervention.  Free software undermines private property by keeping
 software in free, unrestrained public use.  Free software is communally
 shared property.  Libertarians are not opposed to regulation
 universally, only state intervention.  Libertarians support unfree
 software licensing for example, and call any state support of free
 software intervention in the free market.  Not exactly a recipe for
 cooperation.  While I'm sure some libertarians depart from this ruthless
 attack on freedom, it's important to remember that the principal
 interest of libertarians is not protecting freedom, it is to protect
 private property.  Of course, they do equate private property with
 freedom, but that's another discussion.

 Sorry about the off-topic stuff.  BTW, neither is better.  KDE and Gnome
 perform differently on every machine and distribution, for some reason.

 Dave

 On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 15:22, Keith wrote:
  Linux users must be
 
   left wing liberal Democrats because they don't follow the norm..
 
  Actually, the team work, freeness (freedom), open source code, free
  market, less breaucratic (Microsoft, goverment like monsters), less
  regulation, freedom (originally slavery of course), responsibility,
  sharing, etc. are more republican or libertarian in nature.
  Canadian-Bruce Cockburn's- album The trouble with normal  (it always
  gets worse), is a leftiest ake at normal.  (culture  morality)
  I'm alternative in nearly everything I do, from Linux to organic food
  production, Black/White reconciliation, restoration of Constitutional
  law, music, simple joyfull lifestyle, and in general taking on projects
  work that others say are impossible...
  SO I'm not so sure only liberal Democrats do not follow the norm...
  PS...FORGET Coke, fast food (greasy salt  sugar), instant,
  institutions like school,  plastic, pop music, junk literature...
  Enjoy being real.
 
  :)  Keith
 
  On Saturday 04 January 2003 04:54 pm, james Mellema wrote:
   On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 11:49, walt wrote:
Actually the only thing republicans are doing is creating an
unnecessary war but that has nothing to do with linux.. besides,
Linux users must be left wing liberal Democrats because they don't
follow the norm..
   
Walt
  
   Whose is Norm?
  
   I vote for:
   KDE, libertarian, mechanist, Alaskan ANWAR oil exploration.
   --
   --
   Jim
   ---
   james Mellema, CRNA
   ICQ # 19685870
   Linux User 71650
   ---
   The only people who like Microsoft are those who don't understand.
   When people understand what Microsoft is up to, they're outraged...Tim
   O'Reilly
 
I've noticed there is a lot of Red and Yellow in Linux...
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Michael Shinobi a.k.a. 'alfalfa'
Mandrake 8.2
Kernel-2.4.18-8.1mdk
Linux user #298896
Sat Jan 4 23:21:54 EST 2003
11:21pm up 4 days, 1:32, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Homepage: http://micronuke.tripod.com/
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
kernel, n.: A part of an operating system that preserves the medieval 
traditions of sorcery and black art.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-04 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 15:22, mike wrote:

 I've noticed there is a lot of Red and Yellow in Linux...

...and to think I moved to Australia to be away from US politics...I
guess not...

-- 
Sun Jan  5 15:25:00 EST 2003
  3:25pm  up 18:33,  6 users,  load average: 0.73, 0.56, 0.56

kuhn media australia - kma.0catch.com
-
stephen kuhn - katherine kuhn - berkeley, nsw, au
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 5483808 - mobile: 0410-728-389
-PC/Mac/Linux/Consulting/eMarketing-

 * linux user: 267497 * rh 7.3+ *

Darth Vader:
I find your lack of faith disturbing.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [Fwd: Re: [newbie] Which is better:KDE or Gnome?]

2003-01-04 Thread Todd Slater
On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 23:22:43 -0500
mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
  
 I've noticed there is a lot of Red and Yellow in Linux...

and green.

Todd


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com