RE: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new version
I believe it will work either way, although I am not sure. We are having a meeting on Tuesday morning to review the status and I will get more details exactly how this will work. We are also working on a full MTA gateway that will work on both Windows and Linux. It will run presumably on a separate box. We are contracting the basic MTA code from a company that already has done development in this area, and they are adding the hooks we need for SpamManager, then we will finish the final implementation in house. All this is being done in Delphi/Kylix so all the code except the OS specific stuff is sharable between platforms, including the considerable amount of inline assembly that is so crucial to performance. This will allow us to easily maintain versions for both platforms with the same code. The BSD version has to be translated into ANSI C which is why it will be down the road a bit. I don't like ANSI C, you can't use any of the slick classes that C++, Delphi, or Kylix has built in. Everything takes a lot longer. -Brian On 01/30/03 6:28pm you wrote... >Brian >Is your LINUX solution going to be a stand alone solution or is it going to >depend on a local mail server (on the same box)? I was envisioning a scan >server that forwards to another server for final delivery or distribution. >Your comment about BSD made me wonder what you had in mind? I too am anxious >for the LINUX version. > >I'm sure someone could teach the JUNO folks about LINUX. ;) > > >David > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Milburn >> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 6:24 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new >> version >> >> >> >> What's that my grandmother used to say... from your lips to Gods ear? >> >> Actually though, we have a better than excellent shot with Juno. They have >> been a good customer of ours for several years and refer all >> their users to us >> for filtering software. They have asked us several times for an >> anti-porn/spam >> email solution. They run BSD though, and that is not going ready >> for awhile. >> >> -Brian >> >> >> >> On 01/30/03 12:32pm you wrote... >> >Now, if we could just convince AOL... >> > >> >John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA >> >IT Manager, Network Engineer >> >RelianceSoft, Inc. >> >Fullerton, CA 92835 >> >www.reliancesoft.com >> > >> > >> >> -Original Message- >> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:NoX-List- >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Milburn >> >> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:04 PM >> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Subject: RE: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the >> new version >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Bill, >> >> >> >> On 01/30/03 2:31pm you wrote... >> >> >Thanks - that did the trick. >> >> >> >> Excellent! >> >> >> >> >How did your presentation(s) go? >> >> >> >> So far so good. We have a couple of ISPs that are going to dump Postini >> >when >> >> we finish the Postfix version. Actually it works now, but we >> have a lot of >> >> details to look at. Linux is not my thing, so I have to go through >> >everything >> >> with other programmers who have done pretty much a literal translation. >> >> >> >> What we are going to try to push is an >> >> IMail/Declude(Junkmail/Virus)/CYBERsitter platform. We have a new >> >rackmount >> >> dual processor raid5 system coming today that we are going to >> set up for >> >> demonstrations. I am totally convinced that small to mid sized >> ISPs could >> >run >> >> this platform with exceptional results. It is so much easier to manage, >> >and >> >> train people to manage, plus with the mailing lists, support is almost >> >> instantaneous. Even on Christmas! The hardest part will be to convince >> >> died-in-the-wool linux admins that this will make their jobs infinitely >> >> easier. Of course, with things so competitive these days in the ISP >> >market, >> >> this wouldn't be a hard sell at all to the corporate officers. >> >> >> >> Next week we will demo to Cox-Internet, not the whole company, but the >> >> business division based here in Santa Barbara. They may sell our >> >recommended >> >> platform into their fiber customer base. From there, maybe we >> can get the >> >> whole thing!! >> >> >> >> Brian >> >> >> >> --- >> >> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] >> >> >> >> >> >> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >> >> Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> >l.com >> > >> >--- >> >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] >> > >> > >> >Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >> >Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> --- >> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] >> >> >> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >> Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >--- >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] > > >Archives: http://www.mail-ar
RE: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new version
Brian Is your LINUX solution going to be a stand alone solution or is it going to depend on a local mail server (on the same box)? I was envisioning a scan server that forwards to another server for final delivery or distribution. Your comment about BSD made me wonder what you had in mind? I too am anxious for the LINUX version. I'm sure someone could teach the JUNO folks about LINUX. ;) David > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Milburn > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 6:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new > version > > > > What's that my grandmother used to say... from your lips to Gods ear? > > Actually though, we have a better than excellent shot with Juno. They have > been a good customer of ours for several years and refer all > their users to us > for filtering software. They have asked us several times for an > anti-porn/spam > email solution. They run BSD though, and that is not going ready > for awhile. > > -Brian > > > > On 01/30/03 12:32pm you wrote... > >Now, if we could just convince AOL... > > > >John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA > >IT Manager, Network Engineer > >RelianceSoft, Inc. > >Fullerton, CA 92835 > >www.reliancesoft.com > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:NoX-List- > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Milburn > >> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:04 PM > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: RE: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the > new version > >> > >> > >> Hi Bill, > >> > >> On 01/30/03 2:31pm you wrote... > >> >Thanks - that did the trick. > >> > >> Excellent! > >> > >> >How did your presentation(s) go? > >> > >> So far so good. We have a couple of ISPs that are going to dump Postini > >when > >> we finish the Postfix version. Actually it works now, but we > have a lot of > >> details to look at. Linux is not my thing, so I have to go through > >everything > >> with other programmers who have done pretty much a literal translation. > >> > >> What we are going to try to push is an > >> IMail/Declude(Junkmail/Virus)/CYBERsitter platform. We have a new > >rackmount > >> dual processor raid5 system coming today that we are going to > set up for > >> demonstrations. I am totally convinced that small to mid sized > ISPs could > >run > >> this platform with exceptional results. It is so much easier to manage, > >and > >> train people to manage, plus with the mailing lists, support is almost > >> instantaneous. Even on Christmas! The hardest part will be to convince > >> died-in-the-wool linux admins that this will make their jobs infinitely > >> easier. Of course, with things so competitive these days in the ISP > >market, > >> this wouldn't be a hard sell at all to the corporate officers. > >> > >> Next week we will demo to Cox-Internet, not the whole company, but the > >> business division based here in Santa Barbara. They may sell our > >recommended > >> platform into their fiber customer base. From there, maybe we > can get the > >> whole thing!! > >> > >> Brian > >> > >> --- > >> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] > >> > >> > >> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ > >> Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >l.com > > > >--- > >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] > > > > > >Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ > >Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] > > > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ > Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new version
Thanks Bill, Actually all we have to do is finish up the file storage stuff. It is a lot different than Windows because we are operating on the StdInput instead of a file, and are outputting as StdOutput to Postfix, (I think that is what it's called anyway). All the filtering works, and it would probably work right now as a simple test, but we want to enable all the message hold/trash retrieval features. Some of the utilities are not needed because they can be set up as cron (chron?) jobs. (I'm not a Linux guy). I will keep you informed. -Brian On 01/30/03 2:02pm you wrote... >Good luck Brian! And don't forget to let me know when that Linux/Postfix >version is ready for testing. I run three Linux/Postfix gateways, and would >love to implement something like SpamManager on them. > >Bill >- Original Message - >From: "Brian Milburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:04 PM >Subject: RE: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new version > > >> >> Hi Bill, >> >> On 01/30/03 2:31pm you wrote... >> >Thanks - that did the trick. >> >> Excellent! >> >> >How did your presentation(s) go? >> >> So far so good. We have a couple of ISPs that are going to dump Postini >when >> we finish the Postfix version. Actually it works now, but we have a lot of >> details to look at. Linux is not my thing, so I have to go through >everything >> with other programmers who have done pretty much a literal translation. >> >> What we are going to try to push is an >> IMail/Declude(Junkmail/Virus)/CYBERsitter platform. We have a new >rackmount >> dual processor raid5 system coming today that we are going to set up for >> demonstrations. I am totally convinced that small to mid sized ISPs could >run >> this platform with exceptional results. It is so much easier to manage, >and >> train people to manage, plus with the mailing lists, support is almost >> instantaneous. Even on Christmas! The hardest part will be to convince >> died-in-the-wool linux admins that this will make their jobs infinitely >> easier. Of course, with things so competitive these days in the ISP >market, >> this wouldn't be a hard sell at all to the corporate officers. >> >> Next week we will demo to Cox-Internet, not the whole company, but the >> business division based here in Santa Barbara. They may sell our >recommended >> platform into their fiber customer base. From there, maybe we can get the >> whole thing!! >> >> Brian >> >> --- >> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] >> >> >> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >> Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> --- >> [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Pointshare's Virus Scanning >Service] >> > >--- >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] > > >Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new version
What's that my grandmother used to say... from your lips to Gods ear? Actually though, we have a better than excellent shot with Juno. They have been a good customer of ours for several years and refer all their users to us for filtering software. They have asked us several times for an anti-porn/spam email solution. They run BSD though, and that is not going ready for awhile. -Brian On 01/30/03 12:32pm you wrote... >Now, if we could just convince AOL... > >John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA >IT Manager, Network Engineer >RelianceSoft, Inc. >Fullerton, CA 92835 >www.reliancesoft.com > > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:NoX-List- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Milburn >> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:04 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new version >> >> >> Hi Bill, >> >> On 01/30/03 2:31pm you wrote... >> >Thanks - that did the trick. >> >> Excellent! >> >> >How did your presentation(s) go? >> >> So far so good. We have a couple of ISPs that are going to dump Postini >when >> we finish the Postfix version. Actually it works now, but we have a lot of >> details to look at. Linux is not my thing, so I have to go through >everything >> with other programmers who have done pretty much a literal translation. >> >> What we are going to try to push is an >> IMail/Declude(Junkmail/Virus)/CYBERsitter platform. We have a new >rackmount >> dual processor raid5 system coming today that we are going to set up for >> demonstrations. I am totally convinced that small to mid sized ISPs could >run >> this platform with exceptional results. It is so much easier to manage, >and >> train people to manage, plus with the mailing lists, support is almost >> instantaneous. Even on Christmas! The hardest part will be to convince >> died-in-the-wool linux admins that this will make their jobs infinitely >> easier. Of course, with things so competitive these days in the ISP >market, >> this wouldn't be a hard sell at all to the corporate officers. >> >> Next week we will demo to Cox-Internet, not the whole company, but the >> business division based here in Santa Barbara. They may sell our >recommended >> platform into their fiber customer base. From there, maybe we can get the >> whole thing!! >> >> Brian >> >> --- >> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] >> >> >> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >> Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >l.com > >--- >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] > > >Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new version
Good luck Brian! And don't forget to let me know when that Linux/Postfix version is ready for testing. I run three Linux/Postfix gateways, and would love to implement something like SpamManager on them. Bill - Original Message - From: "Brian Milburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:04 PM Subject: RE: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new version > > Hi Bill, > > On 01/30/03 2:31pm you wrote... > >Thanks - that did the trick. > > Excellent! > > >How did your presentation(s) go? > > So far so good. We have a couple of ISPs that are going to dump Postini when > we finish the Postfix version. Actually it works now, but we have a lot of > details to look at. Linux is not my thing, so I have to go through everything > with other programmers who have done pretty much a literal translation. > > What we are going to try to push is an > IMail/Declude(Junkmail/Virus)/CYBERsitter platform. We have a new rackmount > dual processor raid5 system coming today that we are going to set up for > demonstrations. I am totally convinced that small to mid sized ISPs could run > this platform with exceptional results. It is so much easier to manage, and > train people to manage, plus with the mailing lists, support is almost > instantaneous. Even on Christmas! The hardest part will be to convince > died-in-the-wool linux admins that this will make their jobs infinitely > easier. Of course, with things so competitive these days in the ISP market, > this wouldn't be a hard sell at all to the corporate officers. > > Next week we will demo to Cox-Internet, not the whole company, but the > business division based here in Santa Barbara. They may sell our recommended > platform into their fiber customer base. From there, maybe we can get the > whole thing!! > > Brian > > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] > > > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ > Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- > [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Pointshare's Virus Scanning Service] > --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new version
Now, if we could just convince AOL... John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:NoX-List- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Milburn > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new version > > > Hi Bill, > > On 01/30/03 2:31pm you wrote... > >Thanks - that did the trick. > > Excellent! > > >How did your presentation(s) go? > > So far so good. We have a couple of ISPs that are going to dump Postini when > we finish the Postfix version. Actually it works now, but we have a lot of > details to look at. Linux is not my thing, so I have to go through everything > with other programmers who have done pretty much a literal translation. > > What we are going to try to push is an > IMail/Declude(Junkmail/Virus)/CYBERsitter platform. We have a new rackmount > dual processor raid5 system coming today that we are going to set up for > demonstrations. I am totally convinced that small to mid sized ISPs could run > this platform with exceptional results. It is so much easier to manage, and > train people to manage, plus with the mailing lists, support is almost > instantaneous. Even on Christmas! The hardest part will be to convince > died-in-the-wool linux admins that this will make their jobs infinitely > easier. Of course, with things so competitive these days in the ISP market, > this wouldn't be a hard sell at all to the corporate officers. > > Next week we will demo to Cox-Internet, not the whole company, but the > business division based here in Santa Barbara. They may sell our recommended > platform into their fiber customer base. From there, maybe we can get the > whole thing!! > > Brian > > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] > > > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ > Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] l.com --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new version
Hi Bill, On 01/30/03 2:31pm you wrote... >Thanks - that did the trick. Excellent! >How did your presentation(s) go? So far so good. We have a couple of ISPs that are going to dump Postini when we finish the Postfix version. Actually it works now, but we have a lot of details to look at. Linux is not my thing, so I have to go through everything with other programmers who have done pretty much a literal translation. What we are going to try to push is an IMail/Declude(Junkmail/Virus)/CYBERsitter platform. We have a new rackmount dual processor raid5 system coming today that we are going to set up for demonstrations. I am totally convinced that small to mid sized ISPs could run this platform with exceptional results. It is so much easier to manage, and train people to manage, plus with the mailing lists, support is almost instantaneous. Even on Christmas! The hardest part will be to convince died-in-the-wool linux admins that this will make their jobs infinitely easier. Of course, with things so competitive these days in the ISP market, this wouldn't be a hard sell at all to the corporate officers. Next week we will demo to Cox-Internet, not the whole company, but the business division based here in Santa Barbara. They may sell our recommended platform into their fiber customer base. From there, maybe we can get the whole thing!! Brian --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new version
Thanks - that did the trick. How did your presentation(s) go? I would guess the hardest part may be convincing folks that it really works as well as it does ... Anyway, I'm chugging along on the latest & greatest now. -Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Milburn Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new version Un-comment these 2 entries and then no message will be sent and no messages will be held. #SPAMMESSAGENONE #ADULTMESSAGE NONE --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] l.com --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new version
Un-comment these 2 entries and then no message will be sent and no messages will be held. #SPAMMESSAGENONE #ADULTMESSAGE NONE --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[NoXMail] Problem with messages being held in the new version
I downloaded the new version and modified the new .nox file to meet my needs (I thought). My goal is to have all spam messages handled by Declude and all adult messages routed to a particular address. Instead, I'm seeing spam messages being held in the \Imail\NoXMail\Hold folder. My guess is that I've goofed the config file, but would appreciate some help in narrowing it down. Listed below is my .nox file: #CYBERsitter SpamManager CONFIGURATION FILE (MINIMUM CONFIGURATION) #PLEASE SEE THE CONFIGURATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR MORE OPTIONS #GENERAL NOTES # A "#" symbfol or "//" symbol at the beginning of the line indicates a #comment, or when preceeding a configuration value, will "undefine" that #value. # THE FOLLOWING 2 VALUES MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ALL VERSIONS LICENSE (removed) KEY (removed) # THE FOLLOWING 2 KEYS NEED REFLECT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESSES # THE POSTMASTER SHOULD BE A NEW, DEDICATED ACCOUNT FOR # SPAM HANDLING ONLY. POSTMASTER [EMAIL PROTECTED] REPORTSTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] # DECLUDE SPECIFIC OPTIONS WHEN RUNNING SpamManager AS # A DECLUDE TEST ONLY DECLUDETESTONLY TRUE #SPAMMESSAGENONE #ADULTMESSAGE NONE # THE FOLLOWING 4 KEYS NEED TO BE EDITED TO REFLECT YOUR # PREFERENCES **ONLY** IF YOU ROUTE FAILED MESSAGES # TO A PARTICULAR ADDRESS FOR REVIEW #ROUTESPAM [EMAIL PROTECTED] #ROUTESPAMSCORE 40 ROUTEADULT [EMAIL PROTECTED] ROUTEADULTSCORE 50 # IF NOT RUNNING AS A DECLUDE TEST ONLY THEN THE FOLLOWING # 2 VALUES SHOULD BE USED #SPAMMESSAGEDEFAULT #ADULTMESSAGE DEFAULT # THE FOLLOWING 2 VALUES DEFINE WHETHER OR NOT TO SCAN OUTGOING # MAIL AND WILL CAUSE A REJECTION MESSAGE TO BE SENT TO YOUR # USER IF THE OUTGOING MESSAGE FAILS SCANOUTGOINGTRUE SENDREJECTION FALSE ADDHEADER TRUE SPAMHEADER >>>SpamManager SPAM failed<<< ADULTHEADER >>>SpamManager ADULT failed<<< # THE BALANCE OF THESE VALUES ARE RECOMMENDED DEFAULTS AND # NEED NOT BE CHANGED REGARDLESS OF THE OPTIONS ABOVE SENDTOTRASH FALSE ALLOWRELAY FALSE NONENGLISH 6 BADROUTING 12 THRESHOLD 4 PATMATCHES 2 SATURATION 5 LOGALLFAILURES TRUE ADULTSCORE 50 ADULTKILLSCORE 999 SPAMSCORE 18 SPAMKILLSCORE 999 EXITCODESCORE 20 KILLSCORE 999 #ADULTSUBJECT [ADULT] #SPAMSUBJECT[SPAM] LOGDETAIL HIGH (End of .nox file) Thanks, -Bill Naber Kitchin Hospitality, LLC , LLC --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [NoXMail] New License Keys
Hi Bill, Sorry, I didn't post the address yesterday, we had a little bug with the license keys to work out. The address for the latest version is http://www.spammanager.com/imail/cssmbeta.zip Anyone who has their new LICENSE and KEY codes can download and use this version. Please check the NOXMAIL.NOX file. It is now commented with references for normal and Declude specific (Declude test only) installations. -Brian On 01/29/03 7:38am you wrote... >Where is the new post? > >I downloaded from the traditional http://www.noxmail.com/imail/noxbeta.zip >and it seems to be the same old, same old (1/13/03). > >Thanks in advance for your help and good luck with the sales. > >-Bill Naber > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Milburn >Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:12 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [NoXMail] New License Keys > > > >Sorry, I gave you the wrong information. I am not using it as just a test >and >I forget all the Declude specific tweaks that have to be done. > >What is needed is to have no value for SPAMMESSAGE and ADULTMESSAGE, but not >commented out. Just delete the MOVEDIR line entirely. > >I just posted a new version and it will now make more sense. > >Add > >SPAMMESSAGE NONE >ADULTMESSAGE NONE > >and that will cause the hold functions to be ignored because no message is >then defined to send to the end user. > >In the final clean up I have put defaults in for almost all of the values >for >the configuration file. There are really only about 4 that the user actually >needs. I typically do not do this until the final cleanup because you don't >always know what the best defaults are. > >Previously, if the SPAMMESSAGE and/or ADULTMESSAGE were commented out, it >defaulted to nothing. Now it defaults to DEFAULT which is how the majority >of >people will use this. A space would have worked, but I added NONE (or NO >also >works) to make it more clear. > >Sorry for the confusion. > >Brian > > >On 01/28/03 8:09pm you wrote... >>It also appears that the messages are still being held, or deleted, since >>they are not delivered and I don't see them anywhere in the NoXMail >>directory--ouch! For now I have reverted back to the previous version. >> >>Bill >> >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Landry >>Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 8:00 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: RE: [NoXMail] New License Keys >> >> >>Well, that stopped the messages from being held, however, it's still >sending >>out the notification messages, even though there is now nothing for the >user >>to retrieve, which should cause lots of confusion and frustration to our >>customers. Why the undocumented changes in this update? >> >>Bill >> >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Milburn >>Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 5:28 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: [NoXMail] New License Keys >> >> >> >> >>Bill, when you define MOVEDIR put a couple of spaces after it just to be >>safe. >>I haven't tested this in awhile. >> >>--- >>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] >> >> >>Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >>Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>--- >>[This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Pointshare's Virus Scanning >Service] >> >>--- >>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] >> >> >>Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >>Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>--- >>[This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Pointshare's Virus Scanning >Service] >> >>--- >>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] >> >> >>Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >>Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >--- >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] > > >Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >l.com > >--- >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] > > >Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
