Re: [NSWolves]

2010-02-20 Thread Steven Millward
Nope.  Winter Olympics has done away with viewers choice

On 20 February 2010 17:08, Paul Taylor taylorpau...@hotmail.com wrote:

  I trust we are on Viewers Choice?

 --
 From: to...@hotkey.net.au

 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Subject: RE: [NSWolves]
 Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:15:22 +1100


  Let’s just beat chelski tonight and shut everybody up.


  --

 *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Mark Worrall
 *Sent:* Saturday, 20 February 2010 11:37 AM
 *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
 *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves]



 Totally agree Jeremy. If its ok for the top clubs (Man Utd, Arsenal, etc…
 they do it all the time) to field a second strength team for cup matches
 because they know they’ll probably win anyway, why isn’t it ok for clubs
 with lesser teams to field second strength teams because they know they will
 probably lose anyway?  And save their players for the matches they have a
 serious chance of winning. We all accept it is a squad game now anyway. MM
 will be judged (by the judgemental types) entirely on whether we stay up, so
 smart tactics I say. Don’t know what all the whingers are whinging about.



 *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Jeremy Tonks
 *Sent:* Saturday, 20 February 2010 3:14 AM
 *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
 *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves]



 Is there one rule for the big few and another for the rest?


  --

 *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Steven Millward
 *Sent:* Friday, 19 February 2010 8:59 PM
 *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves]



 Makes my blood boil.  How have these people got into the position of
 running an institution of this importance?

 On 19 February 2010 08:11, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
 wrote:

 Absolute disgrace, but it's good to see that there is a lot of sympathy for
 Wolves out there.  Some good comments on this thread:
 http://therepublikofmancunia.com/sticking-up-for-wolves-over-premier-leagues-ridiculous-e20-decision/




  --

 *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *LEESE Matthew
 *Sent:* Friday, 19 February 2010 8:03 AM
 *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
 *Subject:* [NSWolves]
   From yesterday's Fiver

 *WHOSE RULE IS IT ANYWAY?* As anyone stupid enough to listen to what
 Richard Scudamore has to say will know, the people in charge of football are
 making it up as they go along. Chancers to a man, they're flagrantly winging
 it, taking the game in various different directions – down the pan, up its
 own jacksie, into administration – without an effing clue what they're
 actually trying to achieve in the long run. The long what?
 Take the goons on the Premier League board, who have given Wolverhampton
 Wanderers a suspended £25,000 fine for fielding a Tea Lady XI at Old
 Trafford in December. Despite parking the canteen in front of goal, Doris,
 Irene, Edna, Nora, Edith, Ada, Chris Iwelumo, Myrtle, Sylvia and Blanche
 couldn't keep Manchester United out, losing 3-0, and now the game's
 governing body has come down on them like a big plate of iced buns.
 The board deemed that the club had failed to fulfil its obligations to the
 league and other clubs in the utmost good faith and was therefore in breach
 of Rule B13, were the first words muttered in today's improv workshop. The
 board had sympathy for the explanation submitted by the club in relation to
 similar cases from previous seasons, continued the least amusing
 off-the-cuff riff performed since Greg Proops and Josie Lawrence were
 mainstays of Channel 4's Friday night schedule. However the board ruled
 that this case could be differentiated from the other matches cited and that
 disciplinary action was warranted.
 Exactly how they differentiated Wolves' Tea Lady XI from, say, Manchester
 United's Knackered Old Geezers Who Clean Out The Old Trafford Bogs In
 Exchange For Free Carling Cup Tickets XI that faced Hull on the final day of
 last season – Bert, Arthur, Les, Ernie, Tosh, Norm, Roy, Gary Neville, Bill,
 George and Len - wasn't explained. You have to be realistic, said Premier
 League chief executive Scudamore at the time. United have got a squad, and
 therefore you can't argue that they deploy the benefit of that squad. Alex
 Ferguson's going to put a team out that he intends to win that game. Eh?
 Why didn't United get... or why have Wolves been... er... oh. Oh! The Fiver
 is confused. Not as confused as Scudamore and pals, admittedly, but confused
 nonetheless.


  Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This
 e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the
 named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
 information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or 

RE: [NSWolves]

2010-02-20 Thread rognreet
This judgemental type has already judged MM as a hopeless, out dated,
shell shocked, joke. Bet you never realised that.

Be fascinated on how a human being, or any other animal for that matter,
could live without making judgements.

Thanks to a decent priced Arena nag ploughing through the Port Macquarie
mud on Thursday this idiot has taken us to beat Chelski. Nurse bring me my
bed pan and a bucket of valium.


 Totally agree Jeremy. If its ok for the top clubs (Man Utd, Arsenal, etc…
 they do it all the time) to field a second strength team for cup matches
 because they know they’ll probably win anyway, why isn’t it ok for clubs
 with lesser teams to field second strength teams because they know they
 will
 probably lose anyway?  And save their players for the matches they have a
 serious chance of winning. We all accept it is a squad game now anyway. MM
 will be judged (by the judgemental types) entirely on whether we stay up,
 so
 smart tactics I say. Don’t know what all the whingers are whinging about.



 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
 Behalf
 Of Jeremy Tonks
 Sent: Saturday, 20 February 2010 3:14 AM
 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Subject: RE: [NSWolves]



 Is there one rule for the big few and another for the rest?



   _

 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
 Behalf
 Of Steven Millward
 Sent: Friday, 19 February 2010 8:59 PM
 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: [NSWolves]



 Makes my blood boil.  How have these people got into the position of
 running
 an institution of this importance?

 On 19 February 2010 08:11, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
 wrote:

 Absolute disgrace, but it's good to see that there is a lot of sympathy
 for
 Wolves out there.  Some good comments on this thread:
 http://therepublikofmancunia.com/sticking-up-for-wolves-over-premier-leagues
 -ridiculous-e20-decision/





   _

 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
 Behalf
 Of LEESE Matthew
 Sent: Friday, 19 February 2010 8:03 AM
 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
 Subject: [NSWolves]

 From yesterday's Fiver




 WHOSE RULE IS IT ANYWAY?


 As anyone stupid enough to listen to what Richard Scudamore has to say
 will
 know, the people in charge of football are making it up as they go along.
 Chancers to a man, they're flagrantly winging it, taking the game in
 various
 different directions – down the pan, up its own jacksie, into
 administration
 – without an effing clue what they're actually trying to achieve in the
 long
 run. The long what?

 Take the goons on the Premier League board, who have given Wolverhampton
 Wanderers a suspended £25,000 fine for fielding a Tea Lady XI at Old
 Trafford in December. Despite parking the canteen in front of goal, Doris,
 Irene, Edna, Nora, Edith, Ada, Chris Iwelumo, Myrtle, Sylvia and Blanche
 couldn't keep Manchester United out, losing 3-0, and now the game's
 governing body has come down on them like a big plate of iced buns.

 The board deemed that the club had failed to fulfil its obligations to
 the
 league and other clubs in the utmost good faith and was therefore in
 breach
 of Rule B13, were the first words muttered in today's improv workshop.
 The
 board had sympathy for the explanation submitted by the club in relation
 to
 similar cases from previous seasons, continued the least amusing
 off-the-cuff riff performed since Greg Proops and Josie Lawrence were
 mainstays of Channel 4's Friday night schedule. However the board ruled
 that this case could be differentiated from the other matches cited and
 that
 disciplinary action was warranted.

 Exactly how they differentiated Wolves' Tea Lady XI from, say, Manchester
 United's Knackered Old Geezers Who Clean Out The Old Trafford Bogs In
 Exchange For Free Carling Cup Tickets XI that faced Hull on the final day
 of
 last season – Bert, Arthur, Les, Ernie, Tosh, Norm, Roy, Gary Neville,
 Bill,
 George and Len - wasn't explained. You have to be realistic, said
 Premier
 League chief executive Scudamore at the time. United have got a squad,
 and
 therefore you can't argue that they deploy the benefit of that squad. Alex
 Ferguson's going to put a team out that he intends to win that game. Eh?
 Why didn't United get... or why have Wolves been... er... oh. Oh! The
 Fiver
 is confused. Not as confused as Scudamore and pals, admittedly, but
 confused
 nonetheless.





 Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This
 e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by
 the
 named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
 information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
 mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any
 unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views
 expressed
 in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not
 necessarily
 the views of the