Re: [NTG-context] Bold math broken in beta
On 1/2/2018 11:30 PM, Henri wrote:
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 22:40 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/2/2018 10:17 PM, Henri wrote:
\starttext
oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$
\bold{oeps $e^{i\pi} = -1$}
\bold{oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$}
\stoptext
\mb : there is no full-blown bold math in latin modern, just use \bf
Also doesn't work with Lucida (which has a bold math font).
You probably meant \bi, \bf switches to upright as well.
an engine issue ... in node-nut.lua patch this (line 227) ... normally
this branch is not entered
if not direct.getfam then
local getfield = direct.getfield
local setfield = direct.setfield
direct.getfam = function(n) return getfield(n,"small_fam") end
direct.setfam = function(n,f)setfield(n,"small_fam",f) end
end
(we'll probably push a new luatex to the garden one of these days)
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Bold math broken in beta
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 22:40 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1/2/2018 10:17 PM, Henri wrote:
> >
> > \starttext
> >
> > oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$
> >
> > \bold{oeps $e^{i\pi} = -1$}
> >
> > \bold{oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$}
> >
> > \stoptext
> \mb : there is no full-blown bold math in latin modern, just use \bf
Also doesn't work with Lucida (which has a bold math font).
You probably meant \bi, \bf switches to upright as well.
>
> Hans
>
>
>
> -
> Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
> Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
> tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Bold math broken in beta
On 01/02/2018 10:17 PM, Henri wrote:
> \starttext
> oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$
> \bold{oeps $e^{i\pi} = -1$}
> \bold{oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$}
> \stoptext
Hi Henri,
I can confirm the issue with bold math.
From the beta backups I have, it seems to have been introduced in beta
from 2017.10.24 10:30 (previous beta from 2017.10.19 13:50 doesn’t
suffer from the issue.
Just in case it helps,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Bold math broken in beta
On 1/2/2018 10:17 PM, Henri wrote:
\starttext
oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$
\bold{oeps $e^{i\pi} = -1$}
\bold{oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$}
\stoptext
\mb : there is no full-blown bold math in latin modern, just use \bf
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] Bold math broken in beta
\starttext
oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$
\bold{oeps $e^{i\pi} = -1$}
\bold{oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$}
\stoptext
test.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] Bold math trouble
Hi.
I use ConTeXt in Debian. If this helps, please keep it in mind:
dpkg -l context gives:
ii context 2012.05.30.20120611-1
Now, if you consider the following:
code
\usetypescript[palatino][texnansi]
\definetypeface[mainface][mm][math][modern][modern][encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [modern] [modern] [encoding=texnansi]
\switchtobodyfont[palatino,14pt]
\starttext
Hi
\startformula
x = \boldsymbol{\Sigma}\Sigma
\stopformula
\stoptext
/code
The issue I have is that this doesn't work, and throws me:
! Math formula deleted: Insufficient symbol fonts.
\mathboldsymbol ...t]$\mathsurround \zeropoint #1$
}} {\hbox {\switchtoformul...
l.9 x = \boldsymbol{\Sigma}
\Sigma
However, if I make the 14pt above 11pt or 12pt, it works perfectly. Is
there something I am doing wrong?
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Bold math trouble
On 12-8-2012 22:25, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Hi.
I use ConTeXt in Debian. If this helps, please keep it in mind:
dpkg -l context gives:
ii context 2012.05.30.20120611-1
Now, if you consider the following:
code
you can try ad here:
\definebodyfontenvironment[14pt]
\usetypescript[palatino][texnansi]
\definetypeface[mainface][mm][math][modern][modern][encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [modern] [modern] [encoding=texnansi]
\switchtobodyfont[palatino,14pt]
\starttext
Hi
\startformula
x = \boldsymbol{\Sigma}\Sigma
\stopformula
\stoptext
/code
The issue I have is that this doesn't work, and throws me:
! Math formula deleted: Insufficient symbol fonts.
\mathboldsymbol ...t]$\mathsurround \zeropoint #1$
}} {\hbox {\switchtoformul...
l.9 x = \boldsymbol{\Sigma}
\Sigma
However, if I make the 14pt above 11pt or 12pt, it works perfectly. Is
there something I am doing wrong?
maybe there is no bold math available
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Bold math trouble
Dear Hans,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:41:09AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
you can try ad here:
\definebodyfontenvironment[14pt]
Thanks.
\usetypescript[palatino][texnansi]
\definetypeface[mainface][mm][math][modern][modern][encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [modern] [modern]
[encoding=texnansi]
\switchtobodyfont[palatino,14pt]
\starttext
Hi
\startformula
x = \boldsymbol{\Sigma}\Sigma
\stopformula
\stoptext
/code
The issue I have is that this doesn't work, and throws me:
! Math formula deleted: Insufficient symbol fonts.
\mathboldsymbol ...t]$\mathsurround \zeropoint #1$
}} {\hbox
{\switchtoformul...
l.9 x = \boldsymbol{\Sigma}
\Sigma
However, if I make the 14pt above 11pt or 12pt, it works perfectly. Is
there something I am doing wrong?
maybe there is no bold math available
I see. In other words, you are saying that I don't have the fonts to
generate bold math at those sizes?
I'll settle with a workaround without bold math for now, then.
Thanks!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] bold math
Hello Hans, I wanted to use \definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [latin-modern] [default] \starttext $\boldsymbol θ$ \stoptext but it seems to fail in mkii and has no influence in mkiv. (The workaround in mkii is to use \theta instead of θ, in mkiv it makes no difference.) 1. Is there any simple patch that could make θ work in mkii? (I'm working with mkii at the moment) 2. I have no idea what to do in mkiv case. Some of symbols (including bold greek) exist is the same font, some don't and might require another (bolder) font. Maybe fixing the behaviour of \boldsymbol and a few mappings for greek could be enogh to start with. I have tried to enter MATHEMATICAL BOLD ITALIC SMALL THETA directly with LM, but it didn't work (probably there are some mappings still missing, but it's a bit uncomfortable to type proper mathematical symbols anyway as editor is somehow lacking the characters and keyboard would have to be reconfigured heavily). Mojca ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] bold math
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 15:12, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello Hans,
I wanted to use
\definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [latin-modern] [default]
\starttext
$\boldsymbol θ$
\stoptext
but it seems to fail in mkii
Sorry, I take my word back. It works OK with \boldsymbol{θ}. However
the functionality in mkiv still needs to be fixed.
and has no influence in mkiv. (The
workaround in mkii is to use \theta instead of θ, in mkiv it makes no
difference.)
Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] bold math
Mojca Miklavec wrote: and has no influence in mkiv. (The workaround in mkii is to use \theta instead of θ, in mkiv it makes no difference.) in mkiv (unicode) we need complete bold fonts .. (or make additional vectors); bold alphabets are part of math in unicode and should work ok but symbols is a 'whole font' issue Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] bold math
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 15:23, Hans Hagen wrote: Mojca Miklavec wrote: and has no influence in mkiv. (The workaround in mkii is to use \theta instead of θ, in mkiv it makes no difference.) in mkiv (unicode) we need complete bold fonts .. (or make additional vectors); bold alphabets are part of math in unicode and should work ok but symbols is a 'whole font' issue I agree ... there are lots of other symbols. I noticed the tex-bi in math-vfu (I'm still looking into beta version). There's no mapping for it, but I guess that it's probably exactly the same as math-bi. Do you plan to misuse tex-bi or to to define mathematics.make_font ( lmroman10-boldmath ... ) for bold math then? Mojca ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] bold math
Mojca Miklavec wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 15:23, Hans Hagen wrote: Mojca Miklavec wrote: and has no influence in mkiv. (The workaround in mkii is to use \theta instead of θ, in mkiv it makes no difference.) in mkiv (unicode) we need complete bold fonts .. (or make additional vectors); bold alphabets are part of math in unicode and should work ok but symbols is a 'whole font' issue I agree ... there are lots of other symbols. I noticed the tex-bi in math-vfu (I'm still looking into beta version). There's no mapping for it, but I guess that it's probably exactly the same as math-bi. Do you plan to misuse tex-bi or to to define mathematics.make_font ( lmroman10-boldmath ... ) for bold math then? currently only math tf is defined (fam 0) and we will also have math bf (fam 1); mostly a matter of definitions but i was not in the mood to figure out all the bold fonts involved/needed Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] bold math
Mojca Miklavec wrote: I have tried to enter MATHEMATICAL BOLD ITALIC SMALL THETA directly with LM, but it didn't work (probably there are some mappings still missing, but it's a bit uncomfortable to type proper mathematical symbols anyway as editor is somehow lacking the characters and keyboard would have to be reconfigured heavily). sure, which is why most symbols have names too; i expect lm typewriter to be complete with respect to math some day so thatit can be used for editing - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] bold math
Hi, what is the current (preferred) way of using math bold symbols. Bostjan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] bold math
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Bostjan Vesnicer wrote: Hi, what is the current (preferred) way of using math bold symbols. For MKII, define \definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [latin-modern] [default] and then use \boldsymbol around symbol that you want in bold. For MKIV, bold math isn't handled yet. Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] bold math
Thanks, Aditya. I have the same question for calligraphic and doublestroke symbols. Bostjan On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote: On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Bostjan Vesnicer wrote: Hi, what is the current (preferred) way of using math bold symbols. For MKII, define \definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [latin-modern] [default] and then use \boldsymbol around symbol that you want in bold. For MKIV, bold math isn't handled yet. Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] bold math
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Boštjan Vesnicer wrote:
Thanks, Aditya.
I have the same question for calligraphic and doublestroke symbols.
I do not know of fonts that provide calligraphic and doublestroke symbols.
Calligraphic uppercase letters, and doublestroke letters are provided by
ams fonts, and can be used using
{\cal ABC} {\Bbd ABC}
without requiring any extra setup.
Aditya
Bostjan
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Bostjan Vesnicer wrote:
Hi,
what is the current (preferred) way of using math bold symbols.
For MKII, define
\definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [latin-modern] [default]
and then use \boldsymbol around symbol that you want in bold.
For MKIV, bold math isn't handled yet.
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] Bold Math (slightly improved solution)
Hi,
I needed to use \boldsymbol recently, and studied the different
solutions that have been posted on the mailing list. Using a \hbox
wrapper seems to be the easiest way, but none of the definitions using
\hbox took care of spacing around the symbols. Since ConTeXt now has
equivalents of amsmath's \binrel@ and \binrel@@ commands, here is an
improved definition of \boldsymbol.
\definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [latin-modern] [modern]
[encoding=texnansi]
\unprotect
\def\boldsymbol#1%
{\preparebinrel{#1}%
\currentbinrel
{\mathchoice
{\hbox{\switchtoformulabodyfont [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{\hbox{\switchtoformulabodyfont [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{\hbox{\switchtoformulabodyfont [boldmath,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
{\hbox{\switchtoformulabodyfont[boldmath,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
\protect
\starttext
$a \times b$ $a \boldsymbol{\times} b$
\stoptext
This is equivalent to \boldsymbol of amsbsy.sty. I have added this to
the wiki,
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Bold Math (slightly improved solution)
how about \closesymbol (sluitsymbol in dtch) - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Bold Math (slightly improved solution)
Hans Hagen wrote: how about \closesymbol (sluitsymbol in dtch) sorry, different thread -) Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] bold math not mathitalic
I am using the follwing (extracted) typescript lines for math in the lucida fonts:\starttypescript [luc] \definetypeface [luc][mm][math][lucidayy][default][encoding=texnansi] \definetypeface [luc][mm][bfmath][lucidayy][default][encoding=texnansi]\stoptypescript\starttypescript [math] [lucidayy] [default] \definebodyfont [default] [mm] [mr=MathRoman mo 1, mi=MathItalic mo 1, ]\stoptypescript\starttypescript [bfmath] [lucidayy] [default] \definebodyfont [default] [mm] [mrbf=MathRomanBold mo 1, mibf=MathItalicBold mo 1, ]\stoptypescript\starttypescript [math] [lucidayy] [name] \definefontsynonym [MathRoman] [LucidaBright] \definefontsynonym [MathItalic] [LucidaNewMath-AltItalic]\stoptypescript\starttypescript [math] [lucidayy] [texnansi,ec,8r] \definefontsynonym [LucidaBright] [hlhr8y] [encoding=texnansi] \definefontsynonym [LucidaNewMath-AltItalic] [hlcrima]\stoptypescript\starttypescript [bfmath] [lucidayy] [name] \definefontsynonym [MathRomanBold] [LucidaBright-Demi] \definefontsynonym [MathItalicBold] [LucidaNewMath-AltDemiItalic]\stoptypescript\starttypescript [bfmath] [lucidayy] [texnansi,ec,8r] \definefontsynonym [LucidaBright-Demi] [hlhb8y] [encoding=texnansi] \definefontsynonym [LucidaNewMath-AltDemiItalic] [hlcdima]\stoptypescriptTypesetting:\starttext\usetypescript[luc][texnansi]\setupbodyfont[luc,10pt]\lucidatrue{$\sqrt{a^2 + b^2} = c + \mf\sin{}x\quad {\ma NZRC}$}\crlf\stoptext Gives me for the variables neatly LucidaNewMath-AltItalic.But typesetting\starttext\usetypescript[luc][texnansi]\setupbodyfont[luc,10pt]\lucidatrue{$\bfmath\sqrt{a^2 + b^2} = c + \mf\sin{}x\quad {\ma NZRC}$}\crlf\stoptextGives me LucidaBright-Demi instead of LucidaNewMath-AltDemiItalic.Everything else however (even the blackletters from ma) are in the correct bold math font.The font must be present, because substituting MathItalicBold for MathItalic in the [math] script proves that.It seems that mibf has not been substituted, but instead used the mr typeface.Could this be a flaw in the (bold)math handling? For example a wrong fam chosen in the font switch?It seems weird that everything behaves neat except for the bold math italic.Hans van der Meer ___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Bold math in section titles ??
Is it possible to activate bold math printing in a
chapter/section/subsection title? In the example the
numbers withing math mode (and the greek symbols)
are set in regular style, while the rest of the title
is printed in bold.
This is an example using the euler math fonts:
\definetypeface[careless][mm][math][euler][euler][encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface[careless][mm][bfmath][euler][euler]
\definetypeface[boldmath][mm][boldmath][euler][euler]
\definetypeface[boldmath][mm][bfmath][euler][euler]
\setupbodyfont[careless]
\starttext
\setuphead[section][style={\bfa}]
\section{Normal $a^2+b^2=c^2$}
\setuphead[section][style={\switchtobodyfont[boldmath]\bfa}]
\section{Bold $a^2+b^2=c^2$}
\stoptext
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Bold math
At 8/30/2004 10:50, you wrote:
Is there a simple way to get bold (, |, *, and ) in math?
nikolai
I don't know how to get them in the standard cmr fonts, but I have the
lucida fonts installed and realised these bold characters as follows:
\definetypeface [mainface] [rm] [serif] [lucida] [default]
[encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [mainface] [tt] [mono][lucida] [default]
[encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [mainface] [ss] [sans][lucida] [default]
[encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [mainface] [mm] [math,bfmath] [lucida] [default]
[encoding=texnansi]
\setupformulas [method=bold]
\usetypescript [lucida] [texnansi]
\switchtotypeface [lucida] [12pt]
\switchtobodyfont[mainface]
\usemathcollection[lbr]
\setupbodyfont[mainface]
\starttext
${\bfm ( | * )}$
\stoptext
Sytse Knypstra
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Bold math
Sytse Knypstra wrote:
At 8/30/2004 10:50, you wrote:
Is there a simple way to get bold (, |, *, and ) in math?
nikolai
I don't know how to get them in the standard cmr fonts, but I have the
lucida fonts installed and realised these bold characters as follows:
\definetypeface [mainface] [rm] [serif] [lucida] [default]
[encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [mainface] [tt] [mono][lucida] [default]
[encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [mainface] [ss] [sans][lucida] [default]
[encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [mainface] [mm] [math,bfmath] [lucida] [default]
[encoding=texnansi]
\setupformulas [method=bold]
\usetypescript [lucida] [texnansi]
\switchtotypeface [lucida] [12pt]
\switchtobodyfont[mainface]
\usemathcollection[lbr]
\setupbodyfont[mainface]
\starttext
${\bfm ( | * )}$
\stoptext
there is also a magazine about it (see show-mag.pdf at www page)
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] Bold math
Is there a simple way to get bold (, |, *, and ) in math?
nikolai
--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull:: aliases: pcp / lone-star / aka :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA:: loc atm: Gothenburg, Sweden:::
::: page: www.pcppopper.org :: fun atm: gf,lps,ruby,lisp,war3 :::
main(){printf(linux[\021%six\012\0],(linux)[have]+fun-97);}
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] bold math
Hi all.
I've revisited the euler support scripts with an eye towards bold math. I
think I have it right now.
I tried applying the same techniques to computer-modern math in order to
get bold math going for the TeX default font, and it seems not to switch
back to the right font after a grouped \bfm font switch. The minimum case
for this is $x{\bfm x}x$, which gives an italic x, a bold x, and then a
roman x.
Hans (others with full Lucida math?), what does the test case look like?
If you want to try the attached typescript, the following should work well:
\definetypeface[mainface][mm][math][euler][euler]
\definetypeface[mainface][mm][bfmath][euler][euler]
\definetypeface [boldmath][mm][boldmath][euler][euler]
\definetypeface [boldmath][mm][bfmath][euler][euler]
The following fails on cases like the one I described, but is reasonable
otherwise:
\definetypeface[mainface][mm][math][computer-modern][computer-modern]
\definetypeface[mainface][mm][bfmath][computer-modern][computer-modern]
\definetypeface [boldmath][mm][boldmath][computer-modern][computer-modern]
\definetypeface [boldmath][mm][bfmath][computer-modern][computer-modern]
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Adam T. Lindsay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Dept, Lancaster University +44(0)1524/594.537
Lancaster, LA1 4YR, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/593.608
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
type-eul-new.tex
Description: TeX document
cmr-bfm-x.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Re: [NTG-context] bold math
At 10:48 21/11/2003, you wrote:
Ahoj,
On November 11 I asked the list how I could generate bold greek math
symbols (I have the lucida family installed).
Until now I didn't get a response, so maybe I should be more specific.
Let me put it this way:
On page 12 of the `Fonts in ConTeXt' manual I find the footnote:
`Bold math is already prepared in the core modules, so normally one can do
with less code.'
Can anybody tell me what code I have to add and where?
I would like to get the following line
$\theta = {\bfmath \alpha' x}$
with \theta in normal math and \alpha and x in math boldface?
First of all, the definition of \bfmath is broken (i probably never really
tested it)
\def\bfmath{\bf\mf\synchronizesymb\mf}
i'll come back to more advanced mixed normal/bold switching later (playing
a bit with that now);
a main switch to bold math is best done with a new typeface:
(i just found out that there's a typo in type-syn.tex and type-enc.tex:
LucidaNewMath-Demibold - LucidaNewMath-DemiBold
\definetypeface [mainface] [rm] [serif]
[lucida] [default] [encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [mainface] [tt] [mono]
[lucida] [default] [encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [mainface] [ss] [sans]
[lucida] [default] [encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [mainface] [mm] [math]
[lucida] [default] [encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [boldmath] [rm] [serif]
[lucida] [default] [encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [boldmath] [tt] [mono]
[lucida] [default] [encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [boldmath] [ss] [sans]
[lucida] [default] [encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath]
[lucida] [default] [encoding=texnansi]
\switchtobodyfont[mainface] \usemathcollection[lbr] \showmathtoken{Gamma}
\switchtobodyfont[boldmath] \usemathcollection[lbr] \showmathtoken{Gamma}
\startlines
$x=10 \Gamma \Delta \alpha \delta \zeta$
{$x=10 \Gamma \Delta \alpha \delta \zeta$}
{$x=10 \Gamma \Delta \alpha \delta \zeta$}
$\mainface x=10 \Gamma \Delta \alpha \delta \zeta$
$\boldmath x=10 \Gamma \Delta \alpha \delta \zeta$
\stoplines
\startformula
x=12=\fontbody \Gamma \Delta \alpha \delta \zeta
\stopformula
\startformula[mainface]
x=12=\fontbody \Gamma \Delta \alpha \delta \zeta
\stopformula
\startformula[boldmath]
x=12=\fontbody \Gamma \Delta \alpha \delta \zeta
\stopformula
\startformula[boldmath,8pt]
x=8=\fontbody \Gamma \Delta \alpha \delta \zeta
\stopformula
\startformula[boldmath,12pt,small]
x=12s=\fontbody \Gamma \Delta \alpha \delta \zeta
\stopformula
\startformula[boldmath,small]
x=s=\fontbody \Gamma \Delta \alpha \delta \zeta
\stopformula
\startformula[boldmath,10pt]
x=10=\fontbody \Gamma \Delta \alpha \delta \zeta
\stopformula
\startformula[boldmath,11pt,small]
x=11s=\fontbody \Gamma \Delta \alpha \delta \zeta
\stopformula
\startformula[boldmath,9pt]
x=9=\fontbody \Gamma \Delta \alpha \delta \zeta
\stopformula
\formula[boldmath]{1=2x}
Hans
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] bold math
Ahoj,
On November 11 I asked the list how I could generate bold greek math
symbols (I have the lucida family installed).
Until now I didn't get a response, so maybe I should be more specific.
Let me put it this way:
On page 12 of the `Fonts in ConTeXt' manual I find the footnote:
`Bold math is already prepared in the core modules, so normally one can do
with less code.'
Can anybody tell me what code I have to add and where?
I would like to get the following line
$\theta = {\bfmath \alpha' x}$
with \theta in normal math and \alpha and x in math boldface?
Sytse Knypstra
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] bold math
Hi all, I would like to use bold greek math symbols (I have the lucida family installed). In the `Fonts in ConTeXt' manual I concluded from page 12 that this should be relatively simple. However all my attempts failed: either I got the normal math symbols or I got all (roman and greek) symbols bold, whereas I want to use them alternately. I tried the description on the pages 13 and 14, but I couldn't get it working. I simply inserted `,boldmath' in the lucida typescript in the file type-exa and it gave me all symbols bold. I must admit that I don't understand much of what is written in the `Fonts in ConTeXt' manual. Can anybody give me a solution of how to achieve this? BTW. Shouldn't this feature be a standard one in ConTeXt? Thanks Sytse ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
