RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Ken Schaefer
Again - I doubt this is caused by CPU. Besides the almost 99.9% instruction 
compatibility between the two, there would be /so/ many bench marks showing how 
poorly AMD CPUs compare to Intel CPUs out there, especially in the driver 
forums etc. Something else is up.

Cheers
Ken

> -Original Message-
> From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 7:02 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> Both laptops were configured straight from the manufacturer, and
> drivers
> updated when available per the manufacturer's web site (HP).  OS was
> always
> patched.  Vista SP1 on both.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:57 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> I suspect that there is something else at play here, other than the
> CPU.
>
> Are you sure you have exactly the same mass storage controller drivers?
> The
> correct chipset drivers? The same GPU? Etc?
>
> AMD and Intel CPUs are pretty much 99.99% instruction set compatible.
> That's
> why you don't have separate compiled versions of Windows for either OS,
> nor
> do you need drivers that are either Intel or AMD specific. One HAL is
> able
> to abstract both CPUs to the rest of the kernel.
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 6:38 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > So, my recent movement from an AMD to an Intel laptop, and both apps
> > (just
> > two examples -- there are more) performing 100% better, has nothing
> to
> > do
> > with the processor?  Same specs, hardware, OS (32-bit for the new
> > laptop
> > versus x64 for the old laptop, though), apps, etc., yet different
> > processor
> > manufacturer.
> >
> > I'm not necessarily looking for an answer, I'm just happy with my
> > current
> > computing environment, sans AMD.  I was actually astonished in the
> > amount of
> > improvement, and probably won't go the AMD route again.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:26 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > As mentioned, neither Office nor Zune (nor any other user mode
> > application)
> > should know anything about the CPU it's running on (as the kernel
> > handles
> > all CPU interaction). Secondly, I doubt either of these two apps is
> > particularly CPU intensive (they should be waiting for other things
> to
> > happen - like keyboard input). If you are seeing some kind of
> > "slowness"
> > (e.g. screen refresh) then I suspect that something else is at fault.
> >
> > And lastly, both ourselves and Sun have been running a bunch of
> > intensive
> > benchmarks on this Sun gear (both 16 core Intel boxes and 16 core AMD
> > boxes)
> > for various Microsoft workloads (SQL, Exchange, CRM etc), and the AMD
> > boxes,
> > currently, scale much better as you add more CPU cores than the Intel
> > boxes.
> > The Sun engineers tell us this is due to the Intel CPUs being
> > bottlenecked
> > on the memory transport and this will be fixed when Intel moves to
> on-
> > die
> > memory controllers with the Nehalem CPUs that are coming out later
> this
> > year. We haven't seen any "app compat" issues running any of these
> > workloads
> > (or even Hyper-V, which would surely expose such issues as it
> actually
> > runs
> > in privileged mode)
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ken
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 6:11 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > Those apps were just examples (based on the Subject line).
> > >
> > > The instruction set of the CPU plays into it, too, though.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:08 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > Um - there should be no difference whatsoever. Neither Office nor
> > Zune
> > > knows
> > > anything about what the CPU is doing. That is all handled by the
> > > kernel.
> > >
> > > Also, I doubt that either Office or Zune software would be run on a
> > 16
> > > core
> > > or 32 core server.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Ken
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:51 PM
> > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > > >
> > > > General app compatibility.  Office was dog slow on AMD, fast on
> > > Intel.
> > > > Even
> > > > the Zune software runs much better.  I was blaming crappy apps.
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 

RE: Trusts betwen 2k3 domains

2008-04-24 Thread Ken Schaefer
http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Amicrosoft.com+create+forest+trust

returns

Create a forest 
trust
To successfully create a forest trust, your environment will need to be set up 
properly. For more information, see the checklist for creating a forest trust 
...
technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/Library/7929b0c4-efe1-409c-99e3-efe9815f426d1033.mspx
 - 18k - 
Cached
 - Similar 
pages

Creating Forest 
Trusts
You can create a forest trust only between two Windows Server 2003 forests; ... 
To create a forest trust, you must set the forest functional level for both ...
technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/544d5801-205e-45b0-a1d7-cb9c39a7d7091033.mspx
 - 19k - 
Cached
 - Similar 
pages

Checklist: Creating a forest 
trust
Set the forest functional level in both forests to Windows Server 2003 . Raise 
the forest functional level. Create a forest trust. Create a forest trust.
technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/15dfdd7f-3a7f-4d6f-a2b0-569462fb44321033.mspx
 - 16k - 
Cached
 - Similar 
pages

When to create a forest 
trust
Creating a forest trust between two Windows Server 2003 forests provides a 
one-way or two-way, transitive trust relationship between every domain residing 
...
technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/69cacd89-d5dc-4559-9de7-f5e279e603721033.mspx
 - 9k - 
Cached
 - Similar 
pages

Create a one-way, outgoing, forest trust for both sides of the 
trust
If you have administrative credentials only for your domain, you can use the 
procedure Create a one-way, outgoing, forest trust for one side of the trust to 
...
technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/6be107d8-0db1-4ca1-820f-d111cf259a9b1033.mspx
 - 18k - 
Cached
 - Similar 
pages

Professor Windows - March 
2003
A new group named "Incoming Forest Trust Builders" so domain users who are 
members of this group can create inbound Forest trusts. ...
technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb877995.aspx - 18k - 
Cached
 - Similar 
pages

Domain and Forest Trust Tools and 
Settings
Netdom is a command-line tool that allows you to create and manage Active 
Directory trust relationships (except forest trusts) and can help reduce the ...
technet2

Trusts betwen 2k3 domains

2008-04-24 Thread HELP_PC

I'd like to be oriented to step-to step whitepapers for creating trusts
between 2 win2k3 domains(Not Nt or other) in a corporate WAN.
I googled alot but didn't find anythyng complete and specific.

TIA

GuidoElia
HELPPC


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Rod Trent
Both laptops were configured straight from the manufacturer, and drivers
updated when available per the manufacturer's web site (HP).  OS was always
patched.  Vista SP1 on both.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

I suspect that there is something else at play here, other than the CPU.

Are you sure you have exactly the same mass storage controller drivers? The
correct chipset drivers? The same GPU? Etc?

AMD and Intel CPUs are pretty much 99.99% instruction set compatible. That's
why you don't have separate compiled versions of Windows for either OS, nor
do you need drivers that are either Intel or AMD specific. One HAL is able
to abstract both CPUs to the rest of the kernel.

Cheers
Ken

> -Original Message-
> From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 6:38 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> So, my recent movement from an AMD to an Intel laptop, and both apps
> (just
> two examples -- there are more) performing 100% better, has nothing to
> do
> with the processor?  Same specs, hardware, OS (32-bit for the new
> laptop
> versus x64 for the old laptop, though), apps, etc., yet different
> processor
> manufacturer.
>
> I'm not necessarily looking for an answer, I'm just happy with my
> current
> computing environment, sans AMD.  I was actually astonished in the
> amount of
> improvement, and probably won't go the AMD route again.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:26 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> As mentioned, neither Office nor Zune (nor any other user mode
> application)
> should know anything about the CPU it's running on (as the kernel
> handles
> all CPU interaction). Secondly, I doubt either of these two apps is
> particularly CPU intensive (they should be waiting for other things to
> happen - like keyboard input). If you are seeing some kind of
> "slowness"
> (e.g. screen refresh) then I suspect that something else is at fault.
>
> And lastly, both ourselves and Sun have been running a bunch of
> intensive
> benchmarks on this Sun gear (both 16 core Intel boxes and 16 core AMD
> boxes)
> for various Microsoft workloads (SQL, Exchange, CRM etc), and the AMD
> boxes,
> currently, scale much better as you add more CPU cores than the Intel
> boxes.
> The Sun engineers tell us this is due to the Intel CPUs being
> bottlenecked
> on the memory transport and this will be fixed when Intel moves to on-
> die
> memory controllers with the Nehalem CPUs that are coming out later this
> year. We haven't seen any "app compat" issues running any of these
> workloads
> (or even Hyper-V, which would surely expose such issues as it actually
> runs
> in privileged mode)
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 6:11 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > Those apps were just examples (based on the Subject line).
> >
> > The instruction set of the CPU plays into it, too, though.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:08 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > Um - there should be no difference whatsoever. Neither Office nor
> Zune
> > knows
> > anything about what the CPU is doing. That is all handled by the
> > kernel.
> >
> > Also, I doubt that either Office or Zune software would be run on a
> 16
> > core
> > or 32 core server.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ken
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:51 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > General app compatibility.  Office was dog slow on AMD, fast on
> > Intel.
> > > Even
> > > the Zune software runs much better.  I was blaming crappy apps.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:36 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > What compatibility are you talking about?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Ken
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:21 PM
> > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > > >
> > > > I think compatibility is a lot more important that performance.
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:14 PM
> > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > > >
> > > > > 

Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Steve Ens
It doesn't Ken, I was just explaing to Rod that his current cpu was capable
of running a 64 bit OS (he had previously stated that it was a 32bit chip).

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Ken Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Huh,
>
>
>
> What does whether the CPU is 64bit or not have to do with anything?
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thursday, 24 April 2008 6:43 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
>
>
> Rod I think you are absolutely right, all your apps will perform better
> with the Intel vs the Amd.  The new Intel if it is a Centrino is a 64 bit
> processor.
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Rod Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, my recent movement from an AMD to an Intel laptop, and both apps (just
> two examples -- there are more) performing 100% better, has nothing to do
> with the processor?  Same specs, hardware, OS (32-bit for the new laptop
> versus x64 for the old laptop, though), apps, etc., yet different processor
> manufacturer.
>
> I'm not necessarily looking for an answer, I'm just happy with my current
> computing environment, sans AMD.  I was actually astonished in the amount
> of
> improvement, and probably won't go the AMD route again.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:26 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> As mentioned, neither Office nor Zune (nor any other user mode application)
> should know anything about the CPU it's running on (as the kernel handles
> all CPU interaction). Secondly, I doubt either of these two apps is
> particularly CPU intensive (they should be waiting for other things to
> happen - like keyboard input). If you are seeing some kind of "slowness"
> (e.g. screen refresh) then I suspect that something else is at fault.
>
> And lastly, both ourselves and Sun have been running a bunch of intensive
> benchmarks on this Sun gear (both 16 core Intel boxes and 16 core AMD
> boxes)
> for various Microsoft workloads (SQL, Exchange, CRM etc), and the AMD
> boxes,
> currently, scale much better as you add more CPU cores than the Intel
> boxes.
> The Sun engineers tell us this is due to the Intel CPUs being bottlenecked
> on the memory transport and this will be fixed when Intel moves to on-die
> memory controllers with the Nehalem CPUs that are coming out later this
> year. We haven't seen any "app compat" issues running any of these
> workloads
> (or even Hyper-V, which would surely expose such issues as it actually runs
> in privileged mode)
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 6:11 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > Those apps were just examples (based on the Subject line).
> >
> > The instruction set of the CPU plays into it, too, though.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:08 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > Um - there should be no difference whatsoever. Neither Office nor Zune
> > knows
> > anything about what the CPU is doing. That is all handled by the
> > kernel.
> >
> > Also, I doubt that either Office or Zune software would be run on a 16
> > core
> > or 32 core server.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ken
> >
>
>
>
>

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Ken Schaefer
I suspect that there is something else at play here, other than the CPU.

Are you sure you have exactly the same mass storage controller drivers? The 
correct chipset drivers? The same GPU? Etc?

AMD and Intel CPUs are pretty much 99.99% instruction set compatible. That's 
why you don't have separate compiled versions of Windows for either OS, nor do 
you need drivers that are either Intel or AMD specific. One HAL is able to 
abstract both CPUs to the rest of the kernel.

Cheers
Ken

> -Original Message-
> From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 6:38 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> So, my recent movement from an AMD to an Intel laptop, and both apps
> (just
> two examples -- there are more) performing 100% better, has nothing to
> do
> with the processor?  Same specs, hardware, OS (32-bit for the new
> laptop
> versus x64 for the old laptop, though), apps, etc., yet different
> processor
> manufacturer.
>
> I'm not necessarily looking for an answer, I'm just happy with my
> current
> computing environment, sans AMD.  I was actually astonished in the
> amount of
> improvement, and probably won't go the AMD route again.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:26 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> As mentioned, neither Office nor Zune (nor any other user mode
> application)
> should know anything about the CPU it's running on (as the kernel
> handles
> all CPU interaction). Secondly, I doubt either of these two apps is
> particularly CPU intensive (they should be waiting for other things to
> happen - like keyboard input). If you are seeing some kind of
> "slowness"
> (e.g. screen refresh) then I suspect that something else is at fault.
>
> And lastly, both ourselves and Sun have been running a bunch of
> intensive
> benchmarks on this Sun gear (both 16 core Intel boxes and 16 core AMD
> boxes)
> for various Microsoft workloads (SQL, Exchange, CRM etc), and the AMD
> boxes,
> currently, scale much better as you add more CPU cores than the Intel
> boxes.
> The Sun engineers tell us this is due to the Intel CPUs being
> bottlenecked
> on the memory transport and this will be fixed when Intel moves to on-
> die
> memory controllers with the Nehalem CPUs that are coming out later this
> year. We haven't seen any "app compat" issues running any of these
> workloads
> (or even Hyper-V, which would surely expose such issues as it actually
> runs
> in privileged mode)
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 6:11 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > Those apps were just examples (based on the Subject line).
> >
> > The instruction set of the CPU plays into it, too, though.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:08 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > Um - there should be no difference whatsoever. Neither Office nor
> Zune
> > knows
> > anything about what the CPU is doing. That is all handled by the
> > kernel.
> >
> > Also, I doubt that either Office or Zune software would be run on a
> 16
> > core
> > or 32 core server.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ken
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:51 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > General app compatibility.  Office was dog slow on AMD, fast on
> > Intel.
> > > Even
> > > the Zune software runs much better.  I was blaming crappy apps.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:36 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > What compatibility are you talking about?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Ken
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:21 PM
> > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > > >
> > > > I think compatibility is a lot more important that performance.
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:14 PM
> > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 1:34 PM
> > > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > > Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Christopher J. Bosak
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Same specs, just a

RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Ken Schaefer
Huh,

What does whether the CPU is 64bit or not have to do with anything?

Cheers
Ken

From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 6:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

Rod I think you are absolutely right, all your apps will perform better with 
the Intel vs the Amd.  The new Intel if it is a Centrino is a 64 bit processor.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Rod Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, my recent movement from an AMD to an Intel laptop, and both apps (just
two examples -- there are more) performing 100% better, has nothing to do
with the processor?  Same specs, hardware, OS (32-bit for the new laptop
versus x64 for the old laptop, though), apps, etc., yet different processor
manufacturer.

I'm not necessarily looking for an answer, I'm just happy with my current
computing environment, sans AMD.  I was actually astonished in the amount of
improvement, and probably won't go the AMD route again.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

As mentioned, neither Office nor Zune (nor any other user mode application)
should know anything about the CPU it's running on (as the kernel handles
all CPU interaction). Secondly, I doubt either of these two apps is
particularly CPU intensive (they should be waiting for other things to
happen - like keyboard input). If you are seeing some kind of "slowness"
(e.g. screen refresh) then I suspect that something else is at fault.

And lastly, both ourselves and Sun have been running a bunch of intensive
benchmarks on this Sun gear (both 16 core Intel boxes and 16 core AMD boxes)
for various Microsoft workloads (SQL, Exchange, CRM etc), and the AMD boxes,
currently, scale much better as you add more CPU cores than the Intel boxes.
The Sun engineers tell us this is due to the Intel CPUs being bottlenecked
on the memory transport and this will be fixed when Intel moves to on-die
memory controllers with the Nehalem CPUs that are coming out later this
year. We haven't seen any "app compat" issues running any of these workloads
(or even Hyper-V, which would surely expose such issues as it actually runs
in privileged mode)

Cheers
Ken


> -Original Message-
> From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 6:11 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> Those apps were just examples (based on the Subject line).
>
> The instruction set of the CPU plays into it, too, though.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:08 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> Um - there should be no difference whatsoever. Neither Office nor Zune
> knows
> anything about what the CPU is doing. That is all handled by the
> kernel.
>
> Also, I doubt that either Office or Zune software would be run on a 16
> core
> or 32 core server.
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Steve Ens
You bet throw the 64bit OS on therenot that you'll notice a huge speed
increase under 4GB of RAM...but it does work well with Vista.

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Rod Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Intel Core 2 Duo 1.8Ghz
>
>
>
> *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:43 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
>
>
> Rod I think you are absolutely right, all your apps will perform better
> with the Intel vs the Amd.  The new Intel if it is a Centrino is a 64 bit
> processor.
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Rod Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, my recent movement from an AMD to an Intel laptop, and both apps (just
> two examples -- there are more) performing 100% better, has nothing to do
> with the processor?  Same specs, hardware, OS (32-bit for the new laptop
> versus x64 for the old laptop, though), apps, etc., yet different processor
> manufacturer.
>
> I'm not necessarily looking for an answer, I'm just happy with my current
> computing environment, sans AMD.  I was actually astonished in the amount
> of
> improvement, and probably won't go the AMD route again.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:26 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> As mentioned, neither Office nor Zune (nor any other user mode application)
> should know anything about the CPU it's running on (as the kernel handles
> all CPU interaction). Secondly, I doubt either of these two apps is
> particularly CPU intensive (they should be waiting for other things to
> happen - like keyboard input). If you are seeing some kind of "slowness"
> (e.g. screen refresh) then I suspect that something else is at fault.
>
> And lastly, both ourselves and Sun have been running a bunch of intensive
> benchmarks on this Sun gear (both 16 core Intel boxes and 16 core AMD
> boxes)
> for various Microsoft workloads (SQL, Exchange, CRM etc), and the AMD
> boxes,
> currently, scale much better as you add more CPU cores than the Intel
> boxes.
> The Sun engineers tell us this is due to the Intel CPUs being bottlenecked
> on the memory transport and this will be fixed when Intel moves to on-die
> memory controllers with the Nehalem CPUs that are coming out later this
> year. We haven't seen any "app compat" issues running any of these
> workloads
> (or even Hyper-V, which would surely expose such issues as it actually runs
> in privileged mode)
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 6:11 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > Those apps were just examples (based on the Subject line).
> >
> > The instruction set of the CPU plays into it, too, though.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:08 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > Um - there should be no difference whatsoever. Neither Office nor Zune
> > knows
> > anything about what the CPU is doing. That is all handled by the
> > kernel.
> >
> > Also, I doubt that either Office or Zune software would be run on a 16
> > core
> > or 32 core server.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ken
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:51 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > General app compatibility.  Office was dog slow on AMD, fast on
> > Intel.
> > > Even
> > > the Zune software runs much better.  I was blaming crappy apps.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:36 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > What compatibility are you talking about?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Ken
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:21 PM
> > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > > >
> > > > I think compatibility is a lot more important that performance.
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:14 PM
> > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 1:34 PM
> > > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > > Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Christopher J. Bosak
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Same specs, just an
> > > > > > Intel processor instead of an AMD

RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Rod Trent
Intel Core 2 Duo 1.8Ghz

 

From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

Rod I think you are absolutely right, all your apps will perform better with
the Intel vs the Amd.  The new Intel if it is a Centrino is a 64 bit
processor. 

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Rod Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

So, my recent movement from an AMD to an Intel laptop, and both apps (just
two examples -- there are more) performing 100% better, has nothing to do
with the processor?  Same specs, hardware, OS (32-bit for the new laptop
versus x64 for the old laptop, though), apps, etc., yet different processor
manufacturer.

I'm not necessarily looking for an answer, I'm just happy with my current
computing environment, sans AMD.  I was actually astonished in the amount of
improvement, and probably won't go the AMD route again.


-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

As mentioned, neither Office nor Zune (nor any other user mode application)
should know anything about the CPU it's running on (as the kernel handles
all CPU interaction). Secondly, I doubt either of these two apps is
particularly CPU intensive (they should be waiting for other things to
happen - like keyboard input). If you are seeing some kind of "slowness"
(e.g. screen refresh) then I suspect that something else is at fault.

And lastly, both ourselves and Sun have been running a bunch of intensive
benchmarks on this Sun gear (both 16 core Intel boxes and 16 core AMD boxes)
for various Microsoft workloads (SQL, Exchange, CRM etc), and the AMD boxes,
currently, scale much better as you add more CPU cores than the Intel boxes.
The Sun engineers tell us this is due to the Intel CPUs being bottlenecked
on the memory transport and this will be fixed when Intel moves to on-die
memory controllers with the Nehalem CPUs that are coming out later this
year. We haven't seen any "app compat" issues running any of these workloads
(or even Hyper-V, which would surely expose such issues as it actually runs
in privileged mode)

Cheers
Ken


> -Original Message-
> From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 6:11 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> Those apps were just examples (based on the Subject line).
>
> The instruction set of the CPU plays into it, too, though.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:08 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> Um - there should be no difference whatsoever. Neither Office nor Zune
> knows
> anything about what the CPU is doing. That is all handled by the
> kernel.
>
> Also, I doubt that either Office or Zune software would be run on a 16
> core
> or 32 core server.
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:51 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > General app compatibility.  Office was dog slow on AMD, fast on
> Intel.
> > Even
> > the Zune software runs much better.  I was blaming crappy apps.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:36 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > What compatibility are you talking about?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ken
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:21 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > I think compatibility is a lot more important that performance.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:14 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 1:34 PM
> > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Christopher J. Bosak
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Same specs, just an
> > > > > Intel processor instead of an AMD. What a world of difference
> it
> > > > made.
> > > >
> > > >   Right now, AMD's stuff is having trouble competing with Intel
> on
> > > > anything but price.  There was a time (early Pentium 4 era) when
> > AMD
> > > > was kicking Intel's butt.  Competition is good; it keeps
> everybody
> > > > working to improve.
> > >
> > > Actually, at the very high end, AMD is kicking Intel's butt. This
> is
> > > due to
> > > their Hyper-transport mechanism that allows data t

Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Steve Ens
Rod I think you are absolutely right, all your apps will perform better with
the Intel vs the Amd.  The new Intel if it is a Centrino is a 64 bit
processor.

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Rod Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> So, my recent movement from an AMD to an Intel laptop, and both apps (just
> two examples -- there are more) performing 100% better, has nothing to do
> with the processor?  Same specs, hardware, OS (32-bit for the new laptop
> versus x64 for the old laptop, though), apps, etc., yet different processor
> manufacturer.
>
> I'm not necessarily looking for an answer, I'm just happy with my current
> computing environment, sans AMD.  I was actually astonished in the amount
> of
> improvement, and probably won't go the AMD route again.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:26 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> As mentioned, neither Office nor Zune (nor any other user mode application)
> should know anything about the CPU it's running on (as the kernel handles
> all CPU interaction). Secondly, I doubt either of these two apps is
> particularly CPU intensive (they should be waiting for other things to
> happen - like keyboard input). If you are seeing some kind of "slowness"
> (e.g. screen refresh) then I suspect that something else is at fault.
>
> And lastly, both ourselves and Sun have been running a bunch of intensive
> benchmarks on this Sun gear (both 16 core Intel boxes and 16 core AMD
> boxes)
> for various Microsoft workloads (SQL, Exchange, CRM etc), and the AMD
> boxes,
> currently, scale much better as you add more CPU cores than the Intel
> boxes.
> The Sun engineers tell us this is due to the Intel CPUs being bottlenecked
> on the memory transport and this will be fixed when Intel moves to on-die
> memory controllers with the Nehalem CPUs that are coming out later this
> year. We haven't seen any "app compat" issues running any of these
> workloads
> (or even Hyper-V, which would surely expose such issues as it actually runs
> in privileged mode)
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 6:11 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > Those apps were just examples (based on the Subject line).
> >
> > The instruction set of the CPU plays into it, too, though.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:08 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > Um - there should be no difference whatsoever. Neither Office nor Zune
> > knows
> > anything about what the CPU is doing. That is all handled by the
> > kernel.
> >
> > Also, I doubt that either Office or Zune software would be run on a 16
> > core
> > or 32 core server.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ken
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:51 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > General app compatibility.  Office was dog slow on AMD, fast on
> > Intel.
> > > Even
> > > the Zune software runs much better.  I was blaming crappy apps.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:36 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > What compatibility are you talking about?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Ken
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:21 PM
> > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > > >
> > > > I think compatibility is a lot more important that performance.
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:14 PM
> > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 1:34 PM
> > > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > > Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Christopher J. Bosak
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Same specs, just an
> > > > > > Intel processor instead of an AMD. What a world of difference
> > it
> > > > > made.
> > > > >
> > > > >   Right now, AMD's stuff is having trouble competing with Intel
> > on
> > > > > anything but price.  There was a time (early Pentium 4 era) when
> > > AMD
> > > > > was kicking Intel's butt.  Competition is good; it keeps
> > everybody
> > > > > working to improve.
> > > >
> > > > Actually, at the very high end, AMD is kicking Intel's butt. This
> >

RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Rod Trent
So, my recent movement from an AMD to an Intel laptop, and both apps (just
two examples -- there are more) performing 100% better, has nothing to do
with the processor?  Same specs, hardware, OS (32-bit for the new laptop
versus x64 for the old laptop, though), apps, etc., yet different processor
manufacturer.

I'm not necessarily looking for an answer, I'm just happy with my current
computing environment, sans AMD.  I was actually astonished in the amount of
improvement, and probably won't go the AMD route again.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

As mentioned, neither Office nor Zune (nor any other user mode application)
should know anything about the CPU it's running on (as the kernel handles
all CPU interaction). Secondly, I doubt either of these two apps is
particularly CPU intensive (they should be waiting for other things to
happen - like keyboard input). If you are seeing some kind of "slowness"
(e.g. screen refresh) then I suspect that something else is at fault.

And lastly, both ourselves and Sun have been running a bunch of intensive
benchmarks on this Sun gear (both 16 core Intel boxes and 16 core AMD boxes)
for various Microsoft workloads (SQL, Exchange, CRM etc), and the AMD boxes,
currently, scale much better as you add more CPU cores than the Intel boxes.
The Sun engineers tell us this is due to the Intel CPUs being bottlenecked
on the memory transport and this will be fixed when Intel moves to on-die
memory controllers with the Nehalem CPUs that are coming out later this
year. We haven't seen any "app compat" issues running any of these workloads
(or even Hyper-V, which would surely expose such issues as it actually runs
in privileged mode)

Cheers
Ken


> -Original Message-
> From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 6:11 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> Those apps were just examples (based on the Subject line).
>
> The instruction set of the CPU plays into it, too, though.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:08 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> Um - there should be no difference whatsoever. Neither Office nor Zune
> knows
> anything about what the CPU is doing. That is all handled by the
> kernel.
>
> Also, I doubt that either Office or Zune software would be run on a 16
> core
> or 32 core server.
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:51 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > General app compatibility.  Office was dog slow on AMD, fast on
> Intel.
> > Even
> > the Zune software runs much better.  I was blaming crappy apps.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:36 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > What compatibility are you talking about?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ken
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:21 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > I think compatibility is a lot more important that performance.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:14 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 1:34 PM
> > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Christopher J. Bosak
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Same specs, just an
> > > > > Intel processor instead of an AMD. What a world of difference
> it
> > > > made.
> > > >
> > > >   Right now, AMD's stuff is having trouble competing with Intel
> on
> > > > anything but price.  There was a time (early Pentium 4 era) when
> > AMD
> > > > was kicking Intel's butt.  Competition is good; it keeps
> everybody
> > > > working to improve.
> > >
> > > Actually, at the very high end, AMD is kicking Intel's butt. This
> is
> > > due to
> > > their Hyper-transport mechanism that allows data transport to the
> CPU
> > > to
> > > scale better as you add more CPUs. A 16 core AMD solution performs
> > much
> > > better on most CPU workloads than a 16 core Intel offering. And as
> of
> > > now,
> > > only AMD offers 32 core options (8-way, 4 core Barcelona CPUs).
> > >
> > > That said, when the Intel Nehalem CPUs come out later in the year,
> > > Intel
> > > will take back the performance crown (t

RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Ken Schaefer
As mentioned, neither Office nor Zune (nor any other user mode application) 
should know anything about the CPU it's running on (as the kernel handles all 
CPU interaction). Secondly, I doubt either of these two apps is particularly 
CPU intensive (they should be waiting for other things to happen - like 
keyboard input). If you are seeing some kind of "slowness" (e.g. screen 
refresh) then I suspect that something else is at fault.

And lastly, both ourselves and Sun have been running a bunch of intensive 
benchmarks on this Sun gear (both 16 core Intel boxes and 16 core AMD boxes) 
for various Microsoft workloads (SQL, Exchange, CRM etc), and the AMD boxes, 
currently, scale much better as you add more CPU cores than the Intel boxes. 
The Sun engineers tell us this is due to the Intel CPUs being bottlenecked on 
the memory transport and this will be fixed when Intel moves to on-die memory 
controllers with the Nehalem CPUs that are coming out later this year. We 
haven't seen any "app compat" issues running any of these workloads (or even 
Hyper-V, which would surely expose such issues as it actually runs in 
privileged mode)

Cheers
Ken


> -Original Message-
> From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 6:11 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> Those apps were just examples (based on the Subject line).
>
> The instruction set of the CPU plays into it, too, though.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:08 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> Um - there should be no difference whatsoever. Neither Office nor Zune
> knows
> anything about what the CPU is doing. That is all handled by the
> kernel.
>
> Also, I doubt that either Office or Zune software would be run on a 16
> core
> or 32 core server.
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:51 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > General app compatibility.  Office was dog slow on AMD, fast on
> Intel.
> > Even
> > the Zune software runs much better.  I was blaming crappy apps.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:36 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > What compatibility are you talking about?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ken
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:21 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > I think compatibility is a lot more important that performance.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:14 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 1:34 PM
> > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Christopher J. Bosak
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Same specs, just an
> > > > > Intel processor instead of an AMD. What a world of difference
> it
> > > > made.
> > > >
> > > >   Right now, AMD's stuff is having trouble competing with Intel
> on
> > > > anything but price.  There was a time (early Pentium 4 era) when
> > AMD
> > > > was kicking Intel's butt.  Competition is good; it keeps
> everybody
> > > > working to improve.
> > >
> > > Actually, at the very high end, AMD is kicking Intel's butt. This
> is
> > > due to
> > > their Hyper-transport mechanism that allows data transport to the
> CPU
> > > to
> > > scale better as you add more CPUs. A 16 core AMD solution performs
> > much
> > > better on most CPU workloads than a 16 core Intel offering. And as
> of
> > > now,
> > > only AMD offers 32 core options (8-way, 4 core Barcelona CPUs).
> > >
> > > That said, when the Intel Nehalem CPUs come out later in the year,
> > > Intel
> > > will take back the performance crown (they are putting the memory
> > > controller
> > > on die as well).
> > >
> > > I only know this because my company is doing some work with Sun and
> > > Microsoft around various things, and we have all the latest Sun kit
> > > (both
> > > Intel and AMD)
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Ken
>
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~
>
>
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ 

RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Rod Trent
Those apps were just examples (based on the Subject line).  

The instruction set of the CPU plays into it, too, though.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

Um - there should be no difference whatsoever. Neither Office nor Zune knows
anything about what the CPU is doing. That is all handled by the kernel.

Also, I doubt that either Office or Zune software would be run on a 16 core
or 32 core server.

Cheers
Ken

> -Original Message-
> From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:51 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> General app compatibility.  Office was dog slow on AMD, fast on Intel.
> Even
> the Zune software runs much better.  I was blaming crappy apps.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:36 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> What compatibility are you talking about?
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:21 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > I think compatibility is a lot more important that performance.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:14 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 1:34 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Christopher J. Bosak
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Same specs, just an
> > > > Intel processor instead of an AMD. What a world of difference it
> > > made.
> > >
> > >   Right now, AMD's stuff is having trouble competing with Intel on
> > > anything but price.  There was a time (early Pentium 4 era) when
> AMD
> > > was kicking Intel's butt.  Competition is good; it keeps everybody
> > > working to improve.
> >
> > Actually, at the very high end, AMD is kicking Intel's butt. This is
> > due to
> > their Hyper-transport mechanism that allows data transport to the CPU
> > to
> > scale better as you add more CPUs. A 16 core AMD solution performs
> much
> > better on most CPU workloads than a 16 core Intel offering. And as of
> > now,
> > only AMD offers 32 core options (8-way, 4 core Barcelona CPUs).
> >
> > That said, when the Intel Nehalem CPUs come out later in the year,
> > Intel
> > will take back the performance crown (they are putting the memory
> > controller
> > on die as well).
> >
> > I only know this because my company is doing some work with Sun and
> > Microsoft around various things, and we have all the latest Sun kit
> > (both
> > Intel and AMD)
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ken


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Ken Schaefer
Um - there should be no difference whatsoever. Neither Office nor Zune knows 
anything about what the CPU is doing. That is all handled by the kernel.

Also, I doubt that either Office or Zune software would be run on a 16 core or 
32 core server.

Cheers
Ken

> -Original Message-
> From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:51 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> General app compatibility.  Office was dog slow on AMD, fast on Intel.
> Even
> the Zune software runs much better.  I was blaming crappy apps.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:36 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> What compatibility are you talking about?
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:21 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > I think compatibility is a lot more important that performance.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:14 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 1:34 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Christopher J. Bosak
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Same specs, just an
> > > > Intel processor instead of an AMD. What a world of difference it
> > > made.
> > >
> > >   Right now, AMD's stuff is having trouble competing with Intel on
> > > anything but price.  There was a time (early Pentium 4 era) when
> AMD
> > > was kicking Intel's butt.  Competition is good; it keeps everybody
> > > working to improve.
> >
> > Actually, at the very high end, AMD is kicking Intel's butt. This is
> > due to
> > their Hyper-transport mechanism that allows data transport to the CPU
> > to
> > scale better as you add more CPUs. A 16 core AMD solution performs
> much
> > better on most CPU workloads than a 16 core Intel offering. And as of
> > now,
> > only AMD offers 32 core options (8-way, 4 core Barcelona CPUs).
> >
> > That said, when the Intel Nehalem CPUs come out later in the year,
> > Intel
> > will take back the performance crown (they are putting the memory
> > controller
> > on die as well).
> >
> > I only know this because my company is doing some work with Sun and
> > Microsoft around various things, and we have all the latest Sun kit
> > (both
> > Intel and AMD)
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ken


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: DLT secure erase

2008-04-24 Thread Erik Goldoff
I had the same issue with a bunch of DDS and DDS2 tapes ... I ended up
leaving in a box with magnets taken from disassembled hard drives, then took
a hammer to the tapes.  This may not be practical if you have more than 50
or so tapes tho ' 

-Original Message-
From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: DLT secure erase

I'm trying to find a tool like dban to securely erase old DLT backups before
selling the DLT drives and dump the tapes.

Any free tool?

Miguel


  __
Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! La bandeja de entrada más inteligente.


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.4/1395 - Release Date: 4/24/2008
7:24 AM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.4/1395 - Release Date: 4/24/2008
7:24 AM
 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Rod Trent
General app compatibility.  Office was dog slow on AMD, fast on Intel.  Even
the Zune software runs much better.  I was blaming crappy apps.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

What compatibility are you talking about?

Cheers
Ken

> -Original Message-
> From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:21 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> I think compatibility is a lot more important that performance.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:14 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 1:34 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Christopher J. Bosak
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Same specs, just an
> > > Intel processor instead of an AMD. What a world of difference it
> > made.
> >
> >   Right now, AMD's stuff is having trouble competing with Intel on
> > anything but price.  There was a time (early Pentium 4 era) when AMD
> > was kicking Intel's butt.  Competition is good; it keeps everybody
> > working to improve.
>
> Actually, at the very high end, AMD is kicking Intel's butt. This is
> due to
> their Hyper-transport mechanism that allows data transport to the CPU
> to
> scale better as you add more CPUs. A 16 core AMD solution performs much
> better on most CPU workloads than a 16 core Intel offering. And as of
> now,
> only AMD offers 32 core options (8-way, 4 core Barcelona CPUs).
>
> That said, when the Intel Nehalem CPUs come out later in the year,
> Intel
> will take back the performance crown (they are putting the memory
> controller
> on die as well).
>
> I only know this because my company is doing some work with Sun and
> Microsoft around various things, and we have all the latest Sun kit
> (both
> Intel and AMD)
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~
>
>
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Ken Schaefer
What compatibility are you talking about?

Cheers
Ken

> -Original Message-
> From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 5:21 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> I think compatibility is a lot more important that performance.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:14 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 1:34 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Christopher J. Bosak
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Same specs, just an
> > > Intel processor instead of an AMD. What a world of difference it
> > made.
> >
> >   Right now, AMD's stuff is having trouble competing with Intel on
> > anything but price.  There was a time (early Pentium 4 era) when AMD
> > was kicking Intel's butt.  Competition is good; it keeps everybody
> > working to improve.
>
> Actually, at the very high end, AMD is kicking Intel's butt. This is
> due to
> their Hyper-transport mechanism that allows data transport to the CPU
> to
> scale better as you add more CPUs. A 16 core AMD solution performs much
> better on most CPU workloads than a 16 core Intel offering. And as of
> now,
> only AMD offers 32 core options (8-way, 4 core Barcelona CPUs).
>
> That said, when the Intel Nehalem CPUs come out later in the year,
> Intel
> will take back the performance crown (they are putting the memory
> controller
> on die as well).
>
> I only know this because my company is doing some work with Sun and
> Microsoft around various things, and we have all the latest Sun kit
> (both
> Intel and AMD)
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~
>
>
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Rod Trent
I think compatibility is a lot more important that performance.

-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 1:34 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Christopher J. Bosak
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Same specs, just an
> > Intel processor instead of an AMD. What a world of difference it
> made.
>
>   Right now, AMD's stuff is having trouble competing with Intel on
> anything but price.  There was a time (early Pentium 4 era) when AMD
> was kicking Intel's butt.  Competition is good; it keeps everybody
> working to improve.

Actually, at the very high end, AMD is kicking Intel's butt. This is due to
their Hyper-transport mechanism that allows data transport to the CPU to
scale better as you add more CPUs. A 16 core AMD solution performs much
better on most CPU workloads than a 16 core Intel offering. And as of now,
only AMD offers 32 core options (8-way, 4 core Barcelona CPUs).

That said, when the Intel Nehalem CPUs come out later in the year, Intel
will take back the performance crown (they are putting the memory controller
on die as well).

I only know this because my company is doing some work with Sun and
Microsoft around various things, and we have all the latest Sun kit (both
Intel and AMD)

Cheers
Ken

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: MS Office key change

2008-04-24 Thread Free, Bob
At least you didn't say Michealthat would have really put him in a
tailspin...(no offense ME2):-) 


cracked up






From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Office key change



Sorry about that, It shall never happen again!

 

__
Stefan Jafs 

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: April-24-08 18:24
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Office key change

 

Smith, not Smits.

 

Jimmy Smits is no relation.

 

HAH. I crack myself up.

 

From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Office key change

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/895456

 

First Google result.

 

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: MS Office key change

 

Ok I took Michael Smits advise and have been playing with Free from
Microsoft: ImageX, part of windows deployment services

We have been able to create an image and copy to  a new Desktop, however
we are purchasing the Desktops with the "OEM" version of MS Office 2007
and can't find a way to change the Office key.

 

Any suggestions?

 

__
Stefan Jafs 

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or
opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not
represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions
have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the
company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise
from the use of this email or attachments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or
opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not
represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions
have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the
company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise
from the use of this email or attachments.







~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Ken Schaefer
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 1:34 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Christopher J. Bosak
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Same specs, just an
> > Intel processor instead of an AMD. What a world of difference it
> made.
>
>   Right now, AMD's stuff is having trouble competing with Intel on
> anything but price.  There was a time (early Pentium 4 era) when AMD
> was kicking Intel's butt.  Competition is good; it keeps everybody
> working to improve.

Actually, at the very high end, AMD is kicking Intel's butt. This is due to 
their Hyper-transport mechanism that allows data transport to the CPU to scale 
better as you add more CPUs. A 16 core AMD solution performs much better on 
most CPU workloads than a 16 core Intel offering. And as of now, only AMD 
offers 32 core options (8-way, 4 core Barcelona CPUs).

That said, when the Intel Nehalem CPUs come out later in the year, Intel will 
take back the performance crown (they are putting the memory controller on die 
as well).

I only know this because my company is doing some work with Sun and Microsoft 
around various things, and we have all the latest Sun kit (both Intel and AMD)

Cheers
Ken

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: MS Office key change

2008-04-24 Thread Phillip Partipilo
If creating an image for multiple computers, you ought to go thru the steps
in the OEM Preinstallation Kit, which you should have received with your OEM
copy of Office, that resets the installed Office so that the next time it is
executed, you are presented with a EULA and a dialog to enter your new key.
 
 
Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107
 
 
 

  _  

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: MS Office key change



Ok I took Michael Smits advise and have been playing with Free from
Microsoft: ImageX, part of windows deployment services

We have been able to create an image and copy to  a new Desktop, however we
are purchasing the Desktops with the "OEM" version of MS Office 2007 and
can't find a way to change the Office key.

 

Any suggestions?

 

__
Stefan Jafs 

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not
read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed
in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico
Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no
viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility
for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.












  _  




If this email is spam, report it here:


http://www.OnlyMyEmail.com/ReportSpam
 













~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: MS Office key change

2008-04-24 Thread Stefan Jafs
Sorry about that, It shall never happen again!

 

__
Stefan Jafs 

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: April-24-08 18:24
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Office key change

 

Smith, not Smits.

 

Jimmy Smits is no relation.

 

HAH. I crack myself up.

 

From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Office key change

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/895456

 

First Google result.

 

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: MS Office key change

 

Ok I took Michael Smits advise and have been playing with Free from
Microsoft: ImageX, part of windows deployment services

We have been able to create an image and copy to  a new Desktop, however
we are purchasing the Desktops with the "OEM" version of MS Office 2007
and can't find a way to change the Office key.

 

Any suggestions?

 

__
Stefan Jafs 

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or
opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not
represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions
have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the
company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise
from the use of this email or attachments.

 

 

 

 

 

 



This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico 
Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure 
no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility 
for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

More Beta Fun

2008-04-24 Thread Jon B. Lewis
In the spirit of the recent Xobni fun, anyone here interested in the
Evernote beta can get enrolled today.  In case you don't know what it
is, Evernote is kind of like Onenote but it's online so it's accessible
from home, work or cellphone.  No, I don't work for them, just been
playing around with it today and thought I'd pass this along.  

http://preview.evernote.com/Registration.action?code=1MN0tes


Jon Lewis



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: MS Office key change

2008-04-24 Thread Webster
 

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: RE: MS Office key change

 

Smith, not Smits.

 

Jimmy Smits is no relation.

 

HAH. I crack myself up.

 

That makes one of us! J

 

Webster


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: MS Office key change

2008-04-24 Thread Michael B. Smith
Smith, not Smits.

 

Jimmy Smits is no relation.

 

HAH. I crack myself up.

 

From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Office key change

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/895456

 

First Google result.

 

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: MS Office key change

 

Ok I took Michael Smits advise and have been playing with Free from
Microsoft: ImageX, part of windows deployment services

We have been able to create an image and copy to  a new Desktop, however we
are purchasing the Desktops with the "OEM" version of MS Office 2007 and
can't find a way to change the Office key.

 

Any suggestions?

 

__
Stefan Jafs 

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not
read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed
in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico
Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no
viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility
for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

 

 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: MS Office key change

2008-04-24 Thread Stefan Jafs
Thanks

 

__
Stefan Jafs 

 

From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: April-24-08 17:38
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Office key change

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/895456

 

First Google result.

 

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: MS Office key change

 

Ok I took Michael Smits advise and have been playing with Free from
Microsoft: ImageX, part of windows deployment services

We have been able to create an image and copy to  a new Desktop, however
we are purchasing the Desktops with the "OEM" version of MS Office 2007
and can't find a way to change the Office key.

 

Any suggestions?

 

__
Stefan Jafs 

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or
opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not
represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions
have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the
company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise
from the use of this email or attachments.

 

 

 

 



This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico 
Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure 
no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility 
for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: DLT secure erase

2008-04-24 Thread Roger Wright
Less than $25 and takes a lot less time than running each tape through an erase 
cycle:

http://search.ebay.com/tape-eraser_W0QQfromZR41

I have and use the 44-233A and tapes or hard drives are not easily read after 
being hit with it.


Roger Wright



-Original Message-
From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: DLT secure erase

I'm trying to find a tool like dban to securely erase
old DLT backups before selling the DLT drives and dump
the tapes.

Any free tool?

Miguel


  __ 
Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! La bandeja de entrada más inteligente.


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


Re: User Script blagging

2008-04-24 Thread Steven Peck
To return to the thread a bit late, there is even a column with a
powershell one liner on this.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc462810.aspx

Import-CSV 'C:\provision1.csv' |
ForEach-Object {New-QADUser -organizationalUnit 'company.pri/Singers'
-name ($_.'First Name' + '.' + $_.'Last Name')
-samAccountName $_.'Logon name' -city $_.city -title $_.'Job title'
-department $_.department}



On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Steven Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering what a blag was too.
>
>  For the trendy powershell + Quest AD toolkit new-qaduser, get-content
>  and a foreac loop.
>
>  Steven Peck
>  www.blkmtn.org
>
>  On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Michael B. Smith
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > What is a blag?
>  >
>  >  The cmd.exe "for" command, along with "net user" will do it.
>  >
>  >  Regards,
>  >
>  >  Michael B. Smith
>  >  MCSE/Exchange MVP
>  >  http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  -Original Message-
>  >  From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 3:15 PM
>  >  To: NT System Admin Issues
>  >  Subject: User Script blagging
>  >
>  >  Chaps,
>  >
>  >  I'm on the blag. Does anyone have a user creation script that will
>  >  create users from a text file (in the form firstname,lastname) and
>  >  assign the user the basic params (profile path, username, password etc)
>  >  ?
>  >
>  >  I've got one that does the basics but I need to make it add users from a
>  >  text file.
>  >
>  >  Olly
>  >
>  >  ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
>  >  ~   ~
>  >
>  >
>  >  ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
>  >  ~   ~
>  >
>
>  ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
>  ~   ~
>

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


DLT secure erase

2008-04-24 Thread Miguel Gonzalez
I'm trying to find a tool like dban to securely erase
old DLT backups before selling the DLT drives and dump
the tapes.

Any free tool?

Miguel


  __ 
Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! La bandeja de entrada más inteligente.


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: MS Office key change

2008-04-24 Thread Sam Cayze
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/895456

 

First Google result.

 

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: MS Office key change

 

Ok I took Michael Smits advise and have been playing with Free from
Microsoft: ImageX, part of windows deployment services

We have been able to create an image and copy to  a new Desktop, however
we are purchasing the Desktops with the "OEM" version of MS Office 2007
and can't find a way to change the Office key.

 

Any suggestions?

 

__
Stefan Jafs 

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or
opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not
represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions
have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the
company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise
from the use of this email or attachments.

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

MS Office key change

2008-04-24 Thread Stefan Jafs
Ok I took Michael Smits advise and have been playing with Free from
Microsoft: ImageX, part of windows deployment services

We have been able to create an image and copy to  a new Desktop, however
we are purchasing the Desktops with the "OEM" version of MS Office 2007
and can't find a way to change the Office key.

 

Any suggestions?

 

__
Stefan Jafs 

 




This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico 
Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure 
no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility 
for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: audit printers

2008-04-24 Thread Thomas Gonzalez
We have Canon copiers and have the MEAP Accounting Software which shows
print / copies and faxing.

 

 

 

From: mck1012 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:19 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: audit printers

 

Can anyone recommend software to audit what user is printing to what
printer. I do not want to enable auditing on the printer object in AD
and go through the event logs. 

 



Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try
it now.
 

 



This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of 
Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make 
sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept 
responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or 
attachments.
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

Re: audit printers

2008-04-24 Thread James Kerr
I use papercut print logger, there is a free version.
http://www.papercut.com/products/free_software/?printlogger

James

  - Original Message - 
  From: mck1012 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:18 PM
  Subject: audit printers


  Can anyone recommend software to audit what user is printing to what printer. 
I do not want to enable auditing on the printer object in AD and go through the 
event logs. 



--
  Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

audit printers

2008-04-24 Thread mck1012
Can anyone recommend software to audit what user is printing to what printer. I 
do not want to enable auditing on the printer object in AD and go through the 
event logs. 




  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

Re: xobni invites

2008-04-24 Thread Steve Ens
I have 91 gmail invites to give away...email me off list.  LOL

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Xobni viral invites  - see Gmail viral invites back in the day.  Now
> that was some interesting stuff.
>
> Some ppl could, some ppl couldn't.  Some ppl had more invites than
> others.  Some ppl got a new set of invites after giving all theirs
> away - others didn't.
>
> You have to think they were doing some serious analytics to have such
> diverse invite behavior...
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Joe Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This has gotten truly viralplus think about the number of machines
> that
> > the setup file can be copied to and installed on once downloaded
> >
> > They really know what they are doing at Xobni.
> >
> > Joe
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Andy Ognenoff
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I've got 5 if anyone still needs it.
> > >
> > >  - Andy O.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >-Original Message-
> > > >From: Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:40 PM
> > > >To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > >Subject: Re: xobni invites
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >I'll take one! Looks promising...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> > > ~   ~
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Joe Fox
> > Systems/Network Administrator
> >
> > Mobile# (716) 846-9308
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/josephfoxjr
> >
> > The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached
> > files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
> > recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be
> advised
> > that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution or the
> taking
> > of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
> > prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately
> > notify the sender via telephone at 716-846-9308 or by return e-mail.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ME2
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~
>

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on SATA disks

2008-04-24 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Oliver,
Manufactures have moved away from the old faithfull PATA IDE controller and use 
sh!t like that jmicron chipset I see all the time. Thsi complicates things for 
some older distro's.

If you are bent on buying something, I can't help: I do it all myself.

Do try PE if you need something *now*. It _will_ work, if you got NTFS on that 
disk, there was a windows driver for the controller it was on, and you can pump 
that into PE after its booted if your not groov'in on making an integrated PE 
disc. It will be easy and quick.

jlc

From: Oliver Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on SATA disks

Alas, it doesn’t.

Here GParted Live gets half way through then bombs out with read errors and 
every key shows up twice on the screen. Knoppix wont load as it complains it 
cant find the CD (this is after booting from the CD). Tried multiple CD’s and 
DVD images from multiple sources, and have 15 dells here and none of them work.

Ubuntu just beeps loading while loading.

Etc



From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 April 2008 16:07
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on SATA disks

You bet gparted rocks.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Matthew W. Ross <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> wrote:
GPartd LiveCD, or Knoppix running QTPartD

http://gparted.sourceforge.net/livecd.php

Hope that helps.

--Matt Ross

- Original Message -
From: Oliver Marshall
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Thu, 24 Apr 2008
07:37:18 -0700
Subject: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on
SATA disks


> Can anyone recommend a bootable CD based product that will happily
> resize NTFS partitions on SATA disks/controllers ?
>
>
>
> I've tried loads including Zabbix Live, Ubuntu Live, Ultimate Boot Disk
> (contains tones none of which wanna work).
>
>
>
> Anything I can pay for affordable and download quickly ?
>
>
>
> Olly
>
>
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~








~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

Re: xobni invites

2008-04-24 Thread roberto . grippi
And another six available from me ... contact off-list please.
Roberto Grippi


-- 
Dr. Roberto Grippi


2008/4/24 Jon B. Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Ditto.  Got six left currently.
>
> Jon Lewis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:55 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: xobni invites
>
> I've got invites, if anyone still needs.  Contact off-list.
>
>
> Joe Heaton
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:51 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: xobni invites
>
> lol..   For some odd reason I thought that was sent directly to me.
> Time for more coffee!
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry, but I've been all out for hours.
> >
> >
> >
> >  On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Eric Woodford
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > I'll take one! Looks promising...
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >  On 4/24/08, Sherry Abercrombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  >  > Ok, so no invites on mine so far.
> >  >  >
> >  >  > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Christopher J. Bosak
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  >  > wrote:
> >  >  >
> >  >  > >  At the bottom of the pane. J
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >
> >  > > > Christopher J. Bosak
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Vector Company
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > c. 847.603.4673
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC
> > issue."*  >  > >  >  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*  >  > >
> > >  > >  >  > >  >  > > *From:* Sherry Abercrombie
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008
> > 07:57 hrs  >  > > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues  >  > > *Subject:*
> > Re: xobni invites  >  > > >  >  > >  >  > >  >  > > So I've gotten it
> > installed, where do I find the invites to hand out at?
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > BTW, LOVE IT!!
> >  >  > >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, mck1012 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > I would also like one if anyone has an extra.
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >  - Original Message 
> >  >  > > From: Andy Crellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  >  > > To:
>
> > NT System Admin Issues 
> >  >  > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:45:44 AM  >  > > Subject: RE:
>
> > xobni invites  >  > >  >  > > These are all disappearing pretty
> > quickly so if anyone's got a spare one  >  > > knocking about I'd like
>
> > to try it out.
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Cheers,
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Andy.
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > *Andy Crellin *
> >  >  > > Technical Services Manager
> >  >  > > Leonard Cheshire Disability
> >  >  > > Telephone: 01904 479200
> >  >  > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > >  >  > >  >  > >
>
> > >  > > *From:* Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >
> > > > *Sent:* 24 April 2008 13:27  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> > >  > > *Subject:* RE: xobni invites  >  > >  >  > >  >  > >  >  > > I
> > also have some sitting around gathering "dust" if anyone wants any.
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Christopher J. Bosak
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Vector Company
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > c. 847.603.4673
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC
> > issue."*  >  > >  >  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*  >  > >
> > >  > >  >  > >  >  > > *From:* Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE)
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008
> > 07:04 hrs  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues  >  > > *Subject:* RE:
> > xobni invites  >  > >  >  > >  >  > >  >  > > I will take one if you
> > don't mine George.
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Thanks
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Joe Haralson
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >  --  >  > >  >  > > *From:* george
>
> > rovithis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday,
> > April 24, 2008 6:52 AM  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues  >  > >
> > *Subject:* xobni invites  >  > >  >  > > If anybody wants i also have
> > xobni invites  >  > >  --  >  > >  >  > >
> > Get news, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com.
> > Check  >  > > it out! 
> >  >
> >  > > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard
> > Cheshire  >  > > Disability does not accept any liability for the
> content of this message.
> >  >  > > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
>
> > and do n

RE: In-house instant messaging server

2008-04-24 Thread Phillip Partipilo
Thanks all for the replies.  Openfire looks pretty neat, I'll give it a
shot.  Sure can't beat its price :-)  Now if it could do application sharing
that would be berries, but I've got a feeling that's part of what makes the
Microsoft Communication Server so expensive


 
Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107
 
 

-Original Message-
From: Krishna Reddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: In-house instant messaging server



We have Openfire implemented here.  It works well and with the AD
integration you can prepopulate the friends lists. 


Krishna Reddy
IT Manager
Nucomm, Inc.


-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: In-house instant messaging server

I'll second that

Written in Java and runs anywhere you can get Sun's JVM (1.5 or newer)

However, for large deployments (thousands of end users) it can be a resource
pig.

Troy Meyer wrote:
> http://www.igniterealtime.org/projects/openfire/index.jsp
> 
> Openfire is one open source IM server that will integrate with LDAP/AD

> and supports any Jabber capable client (pidgin included).
> 
> We have one in test and it seems nice, but cant testify to large scale

> usage.

-- 

Phil Brutsche
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~





The information contained in this email and attachments to this email are
the proprietary and confidential property of Nucomm, Inc.  The information
is provided in strict confidence and shall not be reproduced, copied, or
used (partially or wholly) in any manner without prior, express written
authorization of Nucomm, Inc.


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~



--
If this email is spam, report it here:
http://www.onlymyemail.com/view/?action=reportSpam&Id=ODEzNjQ6NjE0NjA4MTk0On
BqcEBwc25ldC5jb20%3D



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


Windows SNP and WIndows 2003 and Network Problems

2008-04-24 Thread Ziots, Edward

Hey Gang, 

In Microsoft KB936594 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/936594/en-us

It basically gives directions on how to disabler RSS, TCP Chimmey, and
Offload. 

I verify that the registry settings take place after you add the patch,
but on my DL 380G5's and 360's which we have the NIC's team (Fail on
Fault) it still shows on each individual NIC that RSS is enabled. If I
disable it, the Team blows up, and I have to break the team, disable the
RSS at each nic, rebuild the team, and then it works. 

Have others that are using Teaming with there servers, seen the same
thing? 

How much of a performance improvement have you seen in your Windows 2003
SP2 systems with these updates? 

Words of advice, are appreciated.

Z
Edward E. Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA
Phone: 401-639-3505



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Michael B. Smith
I still think IA64 is architecturally superior. But it simply isn't
backwards compatible...the marketplace decided that was much more important.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Christopher J. Bosak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Same specs, just an
> Intel processor instead of an AMD. What a world of difference it made.

  Right now, AMD's stuff is having trouble competing with Intel on
anything but price.  There was a time (early Pentium 4 era) when AMD
was kicking Intel's butt.  Competition is good; it keeps everybody
working to improve.

  I do find it ironic that the x86-64 standard which has become the
clear winner was designed by AMD.  Intel kept insisting that IA-64 was
the wave of the future, until AMD started to eat their lunch.

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: How to identify DC roles?

2008-04-24 Thread Free, Bob
I just arbitrarily install adminpak on my workstations so it's always in
system32 and I never give it a second thought... 

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to identify DC roles?

Hmm, have netdom but not dsquery.  Does that come from somewhere else? 


Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Free, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 7:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to identify DC roles?

Very easy actually-

netdom query fsmo

dsquery server -forest -isgc

The former will list all the FSMO role holders in the current domain and
the latter will list all the GC's in the forest
 

-Original Message-
From: Juned Shaikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: How to identify DC roles?

Hi,

Need help in identifying Domain Controllers role?

We have about 12 DCs (Mix of win2k and win2k3) and we would like to
decomission or Upgrade some of them. Since they were created during
various stages, I am wondering what are the ways to see what roles are
scattered across. 

I mean, I need to identify which server is hosting Global Catalog, which
is acting as Schema Master etc. 

Any help will be highly appreciated.

Thanks,
 
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Christopher J. Bosak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Same specs, just an
> Intel processor instead of an AMD. What a world of difference it made.

  Right now, AMD's stuff is having trouble competing with Intel on
anything but price.  There was a time (early Pentium 4 era) when AMD
was kicking Intel's butt.  Competition is good; it keeps everybody
working to improve.

  I do find it ironic that the x86-64 standard which has become the
clear winner was designed by AMD.  Intel kept insisting that IA-64 was
the wave of the future, until AMD started to eat their lunch.

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: How to measure packet loss/delay/jitter

2008-04-24 Thread Thomas Mullins
Thanks Adam,

The info you provided looks very promising.

Shane


-Original Message-
From: Adam Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: How to measure packet loss/delay/jitter

You can obtain stats like these using the IP SLA feature on Cisco
devices.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/ios/12_4t/ip_sla/configuration/
guide/htvoipj.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/technologies/tk648/tk362/tk920/technologies_w
hite_paper09186a00802d5efe.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/technologies/tk648/tk362/technologie
s_white_paper0900aecd8022c2cc.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/technologies/tk648/tk362/tk920/technologies_w
hite_paper0900aecd8017f8c9.html


Another option is to run something like iPerf on PCs on both ends of the

link to obtain stats.
http://dast.nlanr.net/Projects/Iperf/ (there is a Windows version
available)

Thanks,
adam


- Original Message - 
From: "Ben Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" 
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: How to measure packet loss/delay/jitter


> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Thomas Mullins
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If anyone has any suggestions on how to measure packet
>> loss/delay/jitter, I would greatly appreciate them.
>
>  FYI, the term "packet delay variation" is the term the IETF
> recommends be used, in favor of "jitter" (which I guess can be
> ambiguous).
>
>  I've had the free and Open Source SmokePing recommended to me for
> this purpose.  I haven't gotten around to trying it yet.  Screen shots
> look impressive as hell, though.  :)
>
> http://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping/
>
>  There's also good old fashioned "ping", which will give you min,
> max, mean, and standard deviation for RTT time, and packet loss.
>
> -- Ben
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~
>
>
>
>
> 






~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: xobni invites

2008-04-24 Thread Jon B. Lewis
Ditto.  Got six left currently.

Jon Lewis

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: xobni invites

I've got invites, if anyone still needs.  Contact off-list. 


Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:51 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: xobni invites

lol..   For some odd reason I thought that was sent directly to me.
Time for more coffee!

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, but I've been all out for hours.
>
>
>
>  On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Eric Woodford
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > I'll take one! Looks promising...
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  On 4/24/08, Sherry Abercrombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >  > Ok, so no invites on mine so far.
>  >  >
>  >  > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Christopher J. Bosak 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  >  > wrote:
>  >  >
>  >  > >  At the bottom of the pane. J
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >
>  > > > Christopher J. Bosak
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Vector Company
>  >  > >
>  >  > > c. 847.603.4673
>  >  > >
>  >  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC 
> issue."*  >  > >  >  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*  >  > >  
> >  > >  >  > >  >  > > *From:* Sherry Abercrombie 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 
> 07:57 hrs  >  > > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues  >  > > *Subject:* 
> Re: xobni invites  >  > > >  >  > >  >  > >  >  > > So I've gotten it 
> installed, where do I find the invites to hand out at?
>  >  > >
>  >  > > BTW, LOVE IT!!
>  >  > >
>  >
>  >
>  > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, mck1012 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>  >  > >
>  >  > > I would also like one if anyone has an extra.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >  - Original Message 
>  >  > > From: Andy Crellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  >  > > To:

> NT System Admin Issues 
>  >  > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:45:44 AM  >  > > Subject: RE:

> xobni invites  >  > >  >  > > These are all disappearing pretty 
> quickly so if anyone's got a spare one  >  > > knocking about I'd like

> to try it out.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Cheers,
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Andy.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *Andy Crellin *
>  >  > > Technical Services Manager
>  >  > > Leonard Cheshire Disability
>  >  > > Telephone: 01904 479200
>  >  > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > >  >  > >  >  > >

> >  > > *From:* Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  
> > > *Sent:* 24 April 2008 13:27  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues  
> >  > > *Subject:* RE: xobni invites  >  > >  >  > >  >  > >  >  > > I 
> also have some sitting around gathering "dust" if anyone wants any.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Christopher J. Bosak
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Vector Company
>  >  > >
>  >  > > c. 847.603.4673
>  >  > >
>  >  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC 
> issue."*  >  > >  >  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*  >  > >  
> >  > >  >  > >  >  > > *From:* Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE) 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 
> 07:04 hrs  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues  >  > > *Subject:* RE: 
> xobni invites  >  > >  >  > >  >  > >  >  > > I will take one if you 
> don't mine George.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Thanks
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Joe Haralson
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >  --  >  > >  >  > > *From:* george

> rovithis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, 
> April 24, 2008 6:52 AM  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues  >  > > 
> *Subject:* xobni invites  >  > >  >  > > If anybody wants i also have 
> xobni invites  >  > >  --  >  > >  >  > > 
> Get news, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. 
> Check  >  > > it out! 
>  >
>  > > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard 
> Cheshire  >  > > Disability does not accept any liability for the
content of this message.
>  >  > > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author

> and do not  >  > > necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire 
> Disability. If you have  >  > > received this transmission in error, 
> please contact the sender and delete  >  > it  >  > > immediately.
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee,

> registered  >  > > in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no:

> 218186 (England &  >  > Wales)  >  > > and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT

> n

RE: xobni invites

2008-04-24 Thread Eldridge, Dave
And its still says beta.

-Original Message-
From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: xobni invites

It's one way to drive your user count up a bit. :)

Christopher J. Bosak
Vector Company
c. 847.603.4673
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."
- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me


-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 15:09 hrs
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: xobni invites

Xobni viral invites  - see Gmail viral invites back in the day.  Now
that was some interesting stuff.

Some ppl could, some ppl couldn't.  Some ppl had more invites than
others.  Some ppl got a new set of invites after giving all theirs
away - others didn't.

You have to think they were doing some serious analytics to have such
diverse invite behavior...


On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Joe Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This has gotten truly viralplus think about the number of machines
that
> the setup file can be copied to and installed on once downloaded
>
> They really know what they are doing at Xobni.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Andy Ognenoff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I've got 5 if anyone still needs it.
> >
> >  - Andy O.
> >
> >
> >
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:40 PM
> > >To: NT System Admin Issues
> > >Subject: Re: xobni invites
> > >
> >
> >
> > >I'll take one! Looks promising...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> > ~   ~
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Joe Fox
> Systems/Network Administrator
>
> Mobile# (716) 846-9308
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/josephfoxjr
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message, including any
attached
> files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
> recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be
advised
> that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution or the
taking
> of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is
strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please
immediately
> notify the sender via telephone at 716-846-9308 or by return e-mail.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
ME2

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately via e-mail 
if you have received this e-mail by mistake; then, delete this e-mail from your 
system.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: xobni invites

2008-04-24 Thread Christopher J. Bosak
It's one way to drive your user count up a bit. :)

Christopher J. Bosak
Vector Company
c. 847.603.4673
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."
- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me


-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 15:09 hrs
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: xobni invites

Xobni viral invites  - see Gmail viral invites back in the day.  Now
that was some interesting stuff.

Some ppl could, some ppl couldn't.  Some ppl had more invites than
others.  Some ppl got a new set of invites after giving all theirs
away - others didn't.

You have to think they were doing some serious analytics to have such
diverse invite behavior...


On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Joe Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This has gotten truly viralplus think about the number of machines
that
> the setup file can be copied to and installed on once downloaded
>
> They really know what they are doing at Xobni.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Andy Ognenoff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I've got 5 if anyone still needs it.
> >
> >  - Andy O.
> >
> >
> >
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:40 PM
> > >To: NT System Admin Issues
> > >Subject: Re: xobni invites
> > >
> >
> >
> > >I'll take one! Looks promising...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> > ~   ~
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Joe Fox
> Systems/Network Administrator
>
> Mobile# (716) 846-9308
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/josephfoxjr
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached
> files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
> recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be advised
> that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking
> of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately
> notify the sender via telephone at 716-846-9308 or by return e-mail.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
ME2

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


Re: xobni invites

2008-04-24 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Xobni viral invites  - see Gmail viral invites back in the day.  Now
that was some interesting stuff.

Some ppl could, some ppl couldn't.  Some ppl had more invites than
others.  Some ppl got a new set of invites after giving all theirs
away - others didn't.

You have to think they were doing some serious analytics to have such
diverse invite behavior...


On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Joe Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This has gotten truly viralplus think about the number of machines that
> the setup file can be copied to and installed on once downloaded
>
> They really know what they are doing at Xobni.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Andy Ognenoff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I've got 5 if anyone still needs it.
> >
> >  - Andy O.
> >
> >
> >
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:40 PM
> > >To: NT System Admin Issues
> > >Subject: Re: xobni invites
> > >
> >
> >
> > >I'll take one! Looks promising...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> > ~   ~
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Joe Fox
> Systems/Network Administrator
>
> Mobile# (716) 846-9308
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/josephfoxjr
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached
> files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
> recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be advised
> that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking
> of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately
> notify the sender via telephone at 716-846-9308 or by return e-mail.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
ME2

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


Re: xobni invites

2008-04-24 Thread Joe Fox
This has gotten truly viralplus think about the number of machines that
the setup file can be copied to and installed on once downloaded

They really know what they are doing at Xobni.

Joe



On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Andy Ognenoff <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I've got 5 if anyone still needs it.
>
>  - Andy O.
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:40 PM
> >To: NT System Admin Issues
> >Subject: Re: xobni invites
> >
> >I'll take one! Looks promising...
>
>
>
>
>  ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~
>



-- 
Joe Fox
Systems/Network Administrator

Mobile# (716) 846-9308
http://www.linkedin.com/in/josephfoxjr

The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached
files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be advised
that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking
of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately
notify the sender via telephone at 716-846-9308 or by return e-mail.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

Re: xobni invites

2008-04-24 Thread Joe Fox
I have invites as wellas usual, contact offlist.

Thanks
Joe Fox

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Joe Heaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I've got invites, if anyone still needs.  Contact off-list.
>
>
> Joe Heaton
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:51 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: xobni invites
>
> lol..   For some odd reason I thought that was sent directly to me.
> Time for more coffee!
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry, but I've been all out for hours.
> >
> >
> >
> >  On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Eric Woodford
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > I'll take one! Looks promising...
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >  On 4/24/08, Sherry Abercrombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  >  > Ok, so no invites on mine so far.
> >  >  >
> >  >  > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Christopher J. Bosak
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  >  > wrote:
> >  >  >
> >  >  > >  At the bottom of the pane. J
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >
> >  > > > Christopher J. Bosak
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Vector Company
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > c. 847.603.4673
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC
> > issue."*  >  > >  >  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*  >  > >
> > >  > >  >  > >  >  > > *From:* Sherry Abercrombie
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008
> > 07:57 hrs  >  > > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues  >  > > *Subject:*
> > Re: xobni invites  >  > > >  >  > >  >  > >  >  > > So I've gotten it
> > installed, where do I find the invites to hand out at?
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > BTW, LOVE IT!!
> >  >  > >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, mck1012 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > I would also like one if anyone has an extra.
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >  - Original Message 
> >  >  > > From: Andy Crellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  >  > > To:
>
> > NT System Admin Issues 
> >  >  > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:45:44 AM  >  > > Subject: RE:
>
> > xobni invites  >  > >  >  > > These are all disappearing pretty
> > quickly so if anyone's got a spare one  >  > > knocking about I'd like
>
> > to try it out.
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Cheers,
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Andy.
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > *Andy Crellin *
> >  >  > > Technical Services Manager
> >  >  > > Leonard Cheshire Disability
> >  >  > > Telephone: 01904 479200
> >  >  > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > >  >  > >  >  > >
>
> > >  > > *From:* Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >
> > > > *Sent:* 24 April 2008 13:27  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> > >  > > *Subject:* RE: xobni invites  >  > >  >  > >  >  > >  >  > > I
> > also have some sitting around gathering "dust" if anyone wants any.
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Christopher J. Bosak
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Vector Company
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > c. 847.603.4673
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC
> > issue."*  >  > >  >  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*  >  > >
> > >  > >  >  > >  >  > > *From:* Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE)
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008
> > 07:04 hrs  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues  >  > > *Subject:* RE:
> > xobni invites  >  > >  >  > >  >  > >  >  > > I will take one if you
> > don't mine George.
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Thanks
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Joe Haralson
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >  --  >  > >  >  > > *From:* george
>
> > rovithis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday,
> > April 24, 2008 6:52 AM  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues  >  > >
> > *Subject:* xobni invites  >  > >  >  > > If anybody wants i also have
> > xobni invites  >  > >  --  >  > >  >  > >
> > Get news, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com.
> > Check  >  > > it out! 
> >  >
> >  > > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard
> > Cheshire  >  > > Disability does not accept any liability for the
> content of this message.
> >  >  > > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
>
> > and do not  >  > > necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire
> > Disability. If you have  >  > > received this transmission in error,
> > please contact the sender and delete  >  > it  >  > > immediately.
> >  >  > >
> >  >  > > Leona

RE: xobni invites

2008-04-24 Thread Joe Heaton
I've got invites, if anyone still needs.  Contact off-list. 


Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:51 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: xobni invites

lol..   For some odd reason I thought that was sent directly to me.
Time for more coffee!

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, but I've been all out for hours.
>
>
>
>  On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Eric Woodford
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > I'll take one! Looks promising...
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  On 4/24/08, Sherry Abercrombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >  > Ok, so no invites on mine so far.
>  >  >
>  >  > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Christopher J. Bosak 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  >  > wrote:
>  >  >
>  >  > >  At the bottom of the pane. J
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >
>  > > > Christopher J. Bosak
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Vector Company
>  >  > >
>  >  > > c. 847.603.4673
>  >  > >
>  >  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC 
> issue."*  >  > >  >  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*  >  > >  
> >  > >  >  > >  >  > > *From:* Sherry Abercrombie 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 
> 07:57 hrs  >  > > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues  >  > > *Subject:* 
> Re: xobni invites  >  > > >  >  > >  >  > >  >  > > So I've gotten it 
> installed, where do I find the invites to hand out at?
>  >  > >
>  >  > > BTW, LOVE IT!!
>  >  > >
>  >
>  >
>  > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, mck1012 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>  >  > >
>  >  > > I would also like one if anyone has an extra.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >  - Original Message 
>  >  > > From: Andy Crellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  >  > > To:

> NT System Admin Issues 
>  >  > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:45:44 AM  >  > > Subject: RE:

> xobni invites  >  > >  >  > > These are all disappearing pretty 
> quickly so if anyone's got a spare one  >  > > knocking about I'd like

> to try it out.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Cheers,
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Andy.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *Andy Crellin *
>  >  > > Technical Services Manager
>  >  > > Leonard Cheshire Disability
>  >  > > Telephone: 01904 479200
>  >  > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > >  >  > >  >  > >

> >  > > *From:* Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  
> > > *Sent:* 24 April 2008 13:27  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues  
> >  > > *Subject:* RE: xobni invites  >  > >  >  > >  >  > >  >  > > I 
> also have some sitting around gathering "dust" if anyone wants any.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Christopher J. Bosak
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Vector Company
>  >  > >
>  >  > > c. 847.603.4673
>  >  > >
>  >  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC 
> issue."*  >  > >  >  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*  >  > >  
> >  > >  >  > >  >  > > *From:* Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE) 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 
> 07:04 hrs  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues  >  > > *Subject:* RE: 
> xobni invites  >  > >  >  > >  >  > >  >  > > I will take one if you 
> don't mine George.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Thanks
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Joe Haralson
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >  --  >  > >  >  > > *From:* george

> rovithis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, 
> April 24, 2008 6:52 AM  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues  >  > > 
> *Subject:* xobni invites  >  > >  >  > > If anybody wants i also have 
> xobni invites  >  > >  --  >  > >  >  > > 
> Get news, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. 
> Check  >  > > it out! 
>  >
>  > > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard 
> Cheshire  >  > > Disability does not accept any liability for the
content of this message.
>  >  > > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author

> and do not  >  > > necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire 
> Disability. If you have  >  > > received this transmission in error, 
> please contact the sender and delete  >  > it  >  > > immediately.
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee,

> registered  >  > > in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no:

> 218186 (England &  >  > Wales)  >  > > and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT

> no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 30  >  > > Millbank, London SW1P 
> 4QD.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >  --  >  > >  >  > > Be a better 
> friend, newshound, a

RE: xobni invites

2008-04-24 Thread Andy Ognenoff
I've got 5 if anyone still needs it.

 - Andy O.

>-Original Message-
>From: Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:40 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: Re: xobni invites
>
>I'll take one! Looks promising...




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: xobni invites

2008-04-24 Thread Eldridge, Dave
I think I started a dup subject earlier.
Sorry for the confusion.

Btw I sent eric one of mine.

-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:51 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: xobni invites

lol..   For some odd reason I thought that was sent directly to me.
Time for more coffee!

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, but I've been all out for hours.
>
>
>
>  On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Eric Woodford
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > I'll take one! Looks promising...
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  On 4/24/08, Sherry Abercrombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >  > Ok, so no invites on mine so far.
>  >  >
>  >  > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Christopher J. Bosak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  > wrote:
>  >  >
>  >  > >  At the bottom of the pane. J
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >
>  > > > Christopher J. Bosak
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Vector Company
>  >  > >
>  >  > > c. 847.603.4673
>  >  > >
>  >  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC
issue."*
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 07:57 hrs
>  >
>  > > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  >  > > *Subject:* Re: xobni invites
>  >
>  > > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > So I've gotten it installed, where do I find the invites to
hand out at?
>  >  > >
>  >  > > BTW, LOVE IT!!
>  >  > >
>  >
>  >
>  > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, mck1012 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>  >  > >
>  >  > > I would also like one if anyone has an extra.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >  - Original Message 
>  >  > > From: Andy Crellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  > > To: NT System Admin Issues

>  >  > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:45:44 AM
>  >  > > Subject: RE: xobni invites
>  >  > >
>  >  > > These are all disappearing pretty quickly so if anyone's got a
spare one
>  >  > > knocking about I'd like to try it out.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Cheers,
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Andy.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *Andy Crellin *
>  >  > > Technical Services Manager
>  >  > > Leonard Cheshire Disability
>  >  > > Telephone: 01904 479200
>  >  > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *From:* Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > > *Sent:* 24 April 2008 13:27
>  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  >  > > *Subject:* RE: xobni invites
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > I also have some sitting around gathering "dust" if anyone
wants any.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Christopher J. Bosak
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Vector Company
>  >  > >
>  >  > > c. 847.603.4673
>  >  > >
>  >  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC
issue."*
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *From:* Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 07:04 hrs
>  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  >  > > *Subject:* RE: xobni invites
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > I will take one if you don't mine George.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Thanks
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Joe Haralson
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >  --
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *From:* george rovithis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:52 AM
>  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  >  > > *Subject:* xobni invites
>  >  > >
>  >  > > If anybody wants i also have xobni invites
>  >  > >  --
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Get news, entertainment and everything you care about at
Live.com. Check
>  >  > > it out! 
>  >
>  > > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard
Cheshire
>  >  > > Disability does not accept any liability for the content of
this message.
>  >  > > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
and do not
>  >  > > necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If
you have
>  >  > > received this transmission in error, please contact the sender
and delete
>  >  > it
>  >  > > immediately.
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee,
registered
>  >  > > in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186
(England &
>  >  > Wales)
>  >  > > and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered
office: 30
>  >  > > Millbank, London SW1P 4QD.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >  --
>  >

RE: xobni invites

2008-04-24 Thread Christopher J. Bosak
I got one left for you, Eric, email me off-list and let me know if anyone
else has sent you one or not.

Christopher J. Bosak
Vector Company
c. 847.603.4673
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."
- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me


-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 14:50 hrs
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: xobni invites

Sorry, but I've been all out for hours.

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Eric Woodford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'll take one! Looks promising...
>
>
>
>
>  On 4/24/08, Sherry Abercrombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > Ok, so no invites on mine so far.
>  >
>  > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Christopher J. Bosak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > wrote:
>  >
>  > >  At the bottom of the pane. J
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>
> > > Christopher J. Bosak
>  > >
>  > > Vector Company
>  > >
>  > > c. 847.603.4673
>  > >
>  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."*
>  > >
>  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 07:57 hrs
>
> > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  > > *Subject:* Re: xobni invites
>
> > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > So I've gotten it installed, where do I find the invites to hand out
at?
>  > >
>  > > BTW, LOVE IT!!
>  > >
>
>
> > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, mck1012 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > I would also like one if anyone has an extra.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  - Original Message 
>  > > From: Andy Crellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > > To: NT System Admin Issues 
>  > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:45:44 AM
>  > > Subject: RE: xobni invites
>  > >
>  > > These are all disappearing pretty quickly so if anyone's got a spare
one
>  > > knocking about I'd like to try it out.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Cheers,
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Andy.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > *Andy Crellin *
>  > > Technical Services Manager
>  > > Leonard Cheshire Disability
>  > > Telephone: 01904 479200
>  > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > *From:* Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > *Sent:* 24 April 2008 13:27
>  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  > > *Subject:* RE: xobni invites
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > I also have some sitting around gathering "dust" if anyone wants any.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Christopher J. Bosak
>  > >
>  > > Vector Company
>  > >
>  > > c. 847.603.4673
>  > >
>  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."*
>  > >
>  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > *From:* Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 07:04 hrs
>  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  > > *Subject:* RE: xobni invites
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > I will take one if you don't mine George.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Thanks
>  > >
>  > > Joe Haralson
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  --
>  > >
>  > > *From:* george rovithis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:52 AM
>  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  > > *Subject:* xobni invites
>  > >
>  > > If anybody wants i also have xobni invites
>  > >  --
>  > >
>  > > Get news, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com.
Check
>  > > it out! 
>
> > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire
>  > > Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this
message.
>  > > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not
>  > > necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you
have
>  > > received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and
delete
>  > it
>  > > immediately.
>  > >
>  > > Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee,
registered
>  > > in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England &
>  > Wales)
>  > > and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office:
30
>  > > Millbank, London SW1P 4QD.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  --
>  > >
>  > > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.
Try it
>  > >
>  >
now.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > --
>
> > > Sherry Abercrombie
>  > >
>  > > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from
magic."
>  > > Arthur C. Clarke
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > Sherry Abercrombie
>  >
>  > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic

Re: xobni invites

2008-04-24 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
lol..   For some odd reason I thought that was sent directly to me.
Time for more coffee!

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, but I've been all out for hours.
>
>
>
>  On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Eric Woodford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > I'll take one! Looks promising...
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  On 4/24/08, Sherry Abercrombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >  > Ok, so no invites on mine so far.
>  >  >
>  >  > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Christopher J. Bosak <[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]>
>  >  > wrote:
>  >  >
>  >  > >  At the bottom of the pane. J
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >
>  > > > Christopher J. Bosak
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Vector Company
>  >  > >
>  >  > > c. 847.603.4673
>  >  > >
>  >  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."*
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 07:57 hrs
>  >
>  > > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  >  > > *Subject:* Re: xobni invites
>  >
>  > > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > So I've gotten it installed, where do I find the invites to hand out 
> at?
>  >  > >
>  >  > > BTW, LOVE IT!!
>  >  > >
>  >
>  >
>  > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, mck1012 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >  > >
>  >  > > I would also like one if anyone has an extra.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >  - Original Message 
>  >  > > From: Andy Crellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  > > To: NT System Admin Issues 
>  >  > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:45:44 AM
>  >  > > Subject: RE: xobni invites
>  >  > >
>  >  > > These are all disappearing pretty quickly so if anyone's got a spare 
> one
>  >  > > knocking about I'd like to try it out.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Cheers,
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Andy.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *Andy Crellin *
>  >  > > Technical Services Manager
>  >  > > Leonard Cheshire Disability
>  >  > > Telephone: 01904 479200
>  >  > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *From:* Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > > *Sent:* 24 April 2008 13:27
>  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  >  > > *Subject:* RE: xobni invites
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > I also have some sitting around gathering "dust" if anyone wants any.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Christopher J. Bosak
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Vector Company
>  >  > >
>  >  > > c. 847.603.4673
>  >  > >
>  >  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."*
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *From:* Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 07:04 hrs
>  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  >  > > *Subject:* RE: xobni invites
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > I will take one if you don't mine George.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Thanks
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Joe Haralson
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >  --
>  >  > >
>  >  > > *From:* george rovithis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:52 AM
>  >  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  >  > > *Subject:* xobni invites
>  >  > >
>  >  > > If anybody wants i also have xobni invites
>  >  > >  --
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Get news, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. 
> Check
>  >  > > it out! 
>  >
>  > > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire
>  >  > > Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this 
> message.
>  >  > > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
> not
>  >  > > necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you 
> have
>  >  > > received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and 
> delete
>  >  > it
>  >  > > immediately.
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, 
> registered
>  >  > > in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England &
>  >  > Wales)
>  >  > > and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 30
>  >  > > Millbank, London SW1P 4QD.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >  --
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. 
> Try it
>  >  > >
>  >  > 
> now.
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
>  >  > >
> 

Re: xobni invites

2008-04-24 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Sorry, but I've been all out for hours.

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Eric Woodford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll take one! Looks promising...
>
>
>
>
>  On 4/24/08, Sherry Abercrombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > Ok, so no invites on mine so far.
>  >
>  > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Christopher J. Bosak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > wrote:
>  >
>  > >  At the bottom of the pane. J
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>
> > > Christopher J. Bosak
>  > >
>  > > Vector Company
>  > >
>  > > c. 847.603.4673
>  > >
>  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."*
>  > >
>  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 07:57 hrs
>
> > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  > > *Subject:* Re: xobni invites
>
> > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > So I've gotten it installed, where do I find the invites to hand out at?
>  > >
>  > > BTW, LOVE IT!!
>  > >
>
>
> > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, mck1012 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > I would also like one if anyone has an extra.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  - Original Message 
>  > > From: Andy Crellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > > To: NT System Admin Issues 
>  > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:45:44 AM
>  > > Subject: RE: xobni invites
>  > >
>  > > These are all disappearing pretty quickly so if anyone's got a spare one
>  > > knocking about I'd like to try it out.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Cheers,
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Andy.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > *Andy Crellin *
>  > > Technical Services Manager
>  > > Leonard Cheshire Disability
>  > > Telephone: 01904 479200
>  > > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > *From:* Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > *Sent:* 24 April 2008 13:27
>  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  > > *Subject:* RE: xobni invites
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > I also have some sitting around gathering "dust" if anyone wants any.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Christopher J. Bosak
>  > >
>  > > Vector Company
>  > >
>  > > c. 847.603.4673
>  > >
>  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."*
>  > >
>  > > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > *From:* Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 07:04 hrs
>  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  > > *Subject:* RE: xobni invites
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > I will take one if you don't mine George.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Thanks
>  > >
>  > > Joe Haralson
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  --
>  > >
>  > > *From:* george rovithis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:52 AM
>  > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>  > > *Subject:* xobni invites
>  > >
>  > > If anybody wants i also have xobni invites
>  > >  --
>  > >
>  > > Get news, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Check
>  > > it out! 
>
> > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire
>  > > Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message.
>  > > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
>  > > necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have
>  > > received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete
>  > it
>  > > immediately.
>  > >
>  > > Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered
>  > > in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England &
>  > Wales)
>  > > and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 30
>  > > Millbank, London SW1P 4QD.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  --
>  > >
>  > > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it
>  > >
>  > 
> now.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > --
>
> > > Sherry Abercrombie
>  > >
>  > > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
>  > > Arthur C. Clarke
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > Sherry Abercrombie
>  >
>  > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
>  > Arthur C. Clarke
>  >
>
> > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
>  > ~   ~
>
>  --
>  Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
>
>
>
>  ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
>  ~   ~
>



-- 
ME2

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~

RE: How to identify DC roles?

2008-04-24 Thread Joe Heaton
Ahh, ok, thanks Ken.  Thought it would be in the Support tools... 


Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to identify DC roles?

Dsquery.exe should be on your Windows 2003 DCs

Cheers
Ken

> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 12:23 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: How to identify DC roles?
>
> Hmm, have netdom but not dsquery.  Does that come from somewhere else?
>
>
> Joe Heaton
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Free, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 7:30 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: How to identify DC roles?
>
> Very easy actually-
>
> netdom query fsmo
>
> dsquery server -forest -isgc
>
> The former will list all the FSMO role holders in the current domain 
> and the latter will list all the GC's in the forest
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Juned Shaikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:59 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: How to identify DC roles?
>
> Hi,
>
> Need help in identifying Domain Controllers role?
>
> We have about 12 DCs (Mix of win2k and win2k3) and we would like to 
> decomission or Upgrade some of them. Since they were created during 
> various stages, I am wondering what are the ways to see what roles are

> scattered across.
>
> I mean, I need to identify which server is hosting Global Catalog, 
> which is acting as Schema Master etc.
>
> Any help will be highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: Group Policy - Screensaver

2008-04-24 Thread gsweers
Create a group policy for screensaver.

Set it for local loopback replace, apply it to the TS OU where the
server resides.  Loopback makes user settings in GP apply to any user
that logs into that workstation/server in the OU its applied too.

Set the Screen saver timeout to 0 minutes, which effectively disables
screensaver.

 

From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Group Policy - Screensaver

 

Thanks

 

Lucy!!!  You've got some readin' to do!

 

 

Roger

 

From: Christopher Boggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Group Policy - Screensaver

 

I can't remember exactly - but I think you are looking for loop-back
policy processing..

 

This site seems to explain it better than I can...

 

http://grouppolicy.editme.com/Loopback

 

-cb



From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Group Policy - Screensaver

 

I have a group of remote users who log in to their local machines and
then to a terminal server to do most of their work.  The user accounts
have a domain group policy applied which enforces a screensaver after xx
minutes.  That's fine, but after they log back in they also have to log
in to the terminal server.

 

Is there a simple way to have the screensaver policy only apply to their
local sessions and not their term server sessions?

 

 

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

727.572.7076  x388

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~<>

Re: xobni invites

2008-04-24 Thread Eric Woodford
I'll take one! Looks promising...



On 4/24/08, Sherry Abercrombie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so no invites on mine so far.
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Christopher J. Bosak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >  At the bottom of the pane. J
> >
> >
> >
> > Christopher J. Bosak
> >
> > Vector Company
> >
> > c. 847.603.4673
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."*
> >
> > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 07:57 hrs
> > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> > *Subject:* Re: xobni invites
> >
> >
> >
> > So I've gotten it installed, where do I find the invites to hand out at?
> >
> > BTW, LOVE IT!!
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, mck1012 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I would also like one if anyone has an extra.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  - Original Message 
> > From: Andy Crellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: NT System Admin Issues 
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:45:44 AM
> > Subject: RE: xobni invites
> >
> > These are all disappearing pretty quickly so if anyone's got a spare one
> > knocking about I'd like to try it out.
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> >
> >
> > *Andy Crellin *
> > Technical Services Manager
> > Leonard Cheshire Disability
> > Telephone: 01904 479200
> > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > *Sent:* 24 April 2008 13:27
> > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> > *Subject:* RE: xobni invites
> >
> >
> >
> > I also have some sitting around gathering "dust" if anyone wants any.
> >
> >
> >
> > Christopher J. Bosak
> >
> > Vector Company
> >
> > c. 847.603.4673
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > *"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."*
> >
> > *- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me*
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 07:04 hrs
> > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> > *Subject:* RE: xobni invites
> >
> >
> >
> > I will take one if you don't mine George.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Joe Haralson
> >
> >
> >  --
> >
> > *From:* george rovithis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:52 AM
> > *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> > *Subject:* xobni invites
> >
> > If anybody wants i also have xobni invites
> >  --
> >
> > Get news, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Check
> > it out! 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire
> > Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message.
> > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
> > necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have
> > received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete
> it
> > immediately.
> >
> > Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered
> > in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England &
> Wales)
> > and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 30
> > Millbank, London SW1P 4QD.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  --
> >
> > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it
> >
> now.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sherry Abercrombie
> >
> > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
> > Arthur C. Clarke
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sherry Abercrombie
>
> "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
> Arthur C. Clarke
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~

-- 
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: How to identify DC roles?

2008-04-24 Thread Ken Schaefer
Dsquery.exe should be on your Windows 2003 DCs

Cheers
Ken

> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 12:23 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: How to identify DC roles?
>
> Hmm, have netdom but not dsquery.  Does that come from somewhere else?
>
>
> Joe Heaton
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Free, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 7:30 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: How to identify DC roles?
>
> Very easy actually-
>
> netdom query fsmo
>
> dsquery server -forest -isgc
>
> The former will list all the FSMO role holders in the current domain
> and
> the latter will list all the GC's in the forest
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Juned Shaikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:59 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: How to identify DC roles?
>
> Hi,
>
> Need help in identifying Domain Controllers role?
>
> We have about 12 DCs (Mix of win2k and win2k3) and we would like to
> decomission or Upgrade some of them. Since they were created during
> various stages, I am wondering what are the ways to see what roles are
> scattered across.
>
> I mean, I need to identify which server is hosting Global Catalog,
> which
> is acting as Schema Master etc.
>
> Any help will be highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: In-house instant messaging server

2008-04-24 Thread Krishna Reddy
We have Openfire implemented here.  It works well and with the AD
integration you can prepopulate the friends lists. 


Krishna Reddy
IT Manager
Nucomm, Inc.


-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: In-house instant messaging server

I'll second that

Written in Java and runs anywhere you can get Sun's JVM (1.5 or newer)

However, for large deployments (thousands of end users) it can be a
resource pig.

Troy Meyer wrote:
> http://www.igniterealtime.org/projects/openfire/index.jsp
> 
> Openfire is one open source IM server that will integrate with LDAP/AD

> and supports any Jabber capable client (pidgin included).
> 
> We have one in test and it seems nice, but cant testify to large scale

> usage.

-- 

Phil Brutsche
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~





The information contained in this email and attachments to this email are the 
proprietary and confidential property 
of Nucomm, Inc.  The information is provided in strict confidence and shall not 
be reproduced, copied, or
used (partially or wholly) in any manner without prior, express written 
authorization of Nucomm, Inc.


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: How to identify DC roles?

2008-04-24 Thread Joe Heaton
Hmm, have netdom but not dsquery.  Does that come from somewhere else? 


Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Free, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 7:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to identify DC roles?

Very easy actually-

netdom query fsmo

dsquery server -forest -isgc

The former will list all the FSMO role holders in the current domain and
the latter will list all the GC's in the forest
 

-Original Message-
From: Juned Shaikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: How to identify DC roles?

Hi,

Need help in identifying Domain Controllers role?

We have about 12 DCs (Mix of win2k and win2k3) and we would like to
decomission or Upgrade some of them. Since they were created during
various stages, I am wondering what are the ways to see what roles are
scattered across. 

I mean, I need to identify which server is hosting Global Catalog, which
is acting as Schema Master etc. 

Any help will be highly appreciated.

Thanks,
 
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: Group Policy - Screensaver

2008-04-24 Thread Roger Wright
Thanks

 

Lucy!!!  You've got some readin' to do!

 

 

Roger

 

From: Christopher Boggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Group Policy - Screensaver

 

I can't remember exactly - but I think you are looking for loop-back
policy processing..

 

This site seems to explain it better than I can...

 

http://grouppolicy.editme.com/Loopback

 

-cb



From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Group Policy - Screensaver

 

I have a group of remote users who log in to their local machines and
then to a terminal server to do most of their work.  The user accounts
have a domain group policy applied which enforces a screensaver after xx
minutes.  That's fine, but after they log back in they also have to log
in to the terminal server.

 

Is there a simple way to have the screensaver policy only apply to their
local sessions and not their term server sessions?

 

 

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

727.572.7076  x388

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~<>

RE: How to easily identify wireless authentication method??

2008-04-24 Thread Joe Heaton
Couldn't your client just look at the network properties on his laptop
to see how his personal computer is connecting to his AP?
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: cs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: How to easily identify wireless authentication method??


Micheal, sorry to confuse you, to be honest I'm confused myself as to
how a web-based tool would determine the wireless authentication method.
:-) I guess I was thinking along the lines of an ActiveX control or
similar that would run on the client. It wouldn't have to hack a WEP key
or anything like that, just identify whether the WLAN is encrypted with
WEP/WPA, etc.
 
Just to put into context, I have a user who has forgotten how his WLAN
is encrypted, and now he needs to connect his company-supplied laptop to
the Interweb. His home PC connects with no qualms so I started thinking
to myself that, rather than having to learn the unique "characteristics"
of whatever wireless client he uses on his home PC, or talk him through
connecting to the web interface on his router, I could just send him a
URL to a web-based tool which would run and identify the encryption
type. Using the information from this tool I could then send him a
concise instruction on how to configure XP's WZC client to connect to
the WAP.
 
Hope that all makes sense, and apologies for not articulating the
requirement in the first instance.

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Ames Matthew B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:


Surely you need to run something on the local PC/laptop to
determine that how is a web server going to know what sort of wifi
connction your using (if at all)!



From: cs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 23 April 2008 16:21
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: How to easily identify wireless authentication method??


Hello all,
Does anyone know of any tools/scripts that run from a website
that will tell an IT luddite what wireless authentication method they're
using, i.e. WEP (Open/Shared), WPA, WPA2, etc.?
 
Hope that makes sense.




The information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent 
correspondence is private and is intended solely for the
intended 
recipient(s).  The information in this communication may be 
confidential and/or legally privileged.  Nothing in this e-mail
is 
intended to conclude a contract on behalf of QinetiQ or make
QinetiQ 
subject to any other legally binding commitments, unless the
e-mail 
contains an express statement to the contrary or incorporates a
formal Purchase Order.

For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
reliance 
on such information is prohibited and may be unlawful.

Emails and other electronic communication with QinetiQ may be 
monitored and recorded for business purposes including security,
audit 
and archival purposes.  Any response to this email indicates
consent 
to this.

Telephone calls to QinetiQ may be monitored or recorded for
quality 
control, security and other business purposes.

QinetiQ Limited
Registered in England & Wales: Company Number:3796233
Registered office: 85 Buckingham Gate, London SW1E 6PD, United
Kingdom
Trading address: Cody Technology Park, Cody Building, Ively
Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX, United Kingdom 
http://www.QinetiQ.com/home/legal.html























~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: best options for file server replication / mirroring

2008-04-24 Thread Webb, Brian (Corp)
DFS R2 is really good.  We have moved several remote sites where the
tapes drive has failed to a system where DFS R2 is copying the data back
to a central server across the WAN.  We have it syncing data stores of
30+ GB with no problem whatsoever.  After the initial copy, the traffic
isn't even noticeable on the network.  We found out that an old
distribution directory was on 2 of the remote servers when the 2nd one
replicated and the total data transferred was way less than the amount
of data on the server because it already existed on the target server.
 
-Brian

 



From: Matt McComas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: best options for file server replication / mirroring


I was curious what you guys thought are the best options for the
following scenario:
 
You have two file servers we'll call A and B.  You want A to replicate
it's data to B, and prefer only changes replicated, and you'd like to
centrally manage these replication processes.
 
Possible solutions I've thought of:
1. DFS shares
2. Robocopy
 
Are there any other native Windows Server 2003 R2 components that will
help this?  How about good third party products to manage this process?
Ideally, you'd want to manage the process or jobs from a central
location, but only have the data replicated and copied between the hosts
in question (not traveling through the job or management server).
 
thoughts, ideas?
 
Thanks,
MM


 


-- 

This e-mail message, including any files and attachments, is intended
only for the recipient(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain
confidential, proprietary and/or personal information. Individual
recipients of this e-mail message are expected to honor the internal and
confidential nature of the e-mail and not forward it via the Internet or
by any other means to persons who are not listed as addressees without
proper authorization. If you are not an intended recipient of this
email, do not save, disclose, print, forward or copy this email, and
delete it immediately. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be a
violation of federal and/or state law and regulations. 

 

If you receive this information in error, please immediately notify
Dallas Baptist University via telephone at 214-333-5500 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Dallas Baptist University hereby claims all applicable
privileges related to this information. 


-- 




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: Xobni issues and invites

2008-04-24 Thread Carl Houseman
Can't believe I had so many typos in that message.  Obviously if you've kept
up with the follow-ups you now know it's unread->read that's the problem.

And the feature I'd like to see is delete message or entire conversation
from Xobni.   I find old conversations that I want to delete, then have to
go search for the messages in the regular Outlook search engine.  And the
regular search engine isn't indexing old material either!

Carl

-Original Message-
From: WL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:18 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Xobni issues and invites

ExtraOutlook is the problem there, of course, but you knew that. (I
don't find it all that 'common' either. Not sure if that is what you
meant.).

>>Messages going unread by themselves isn't something I can tolerate
for very long

I have been using Xobni for months across multiple accounts and
multiple versions.  I have not seen any messages marked unread as a
result. I am going to look at that closer.
I do hope they bring back some of the features that were in the
earlier betas, though.

http://www.slipstick.com/reviews/xobni.htm

William



On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Carl Houseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> Monday I put my name on the list at the Xobni website and got approved
less
> than 24 hours later.  It may have had something to do with my using Vista
> and Outlook 2007.
>
>
>
> So I have 6 invitations if anyone wants one, but ask in PRIVATE mail only.
>
>
>
> Installed it this morning and already I have "issues".
>
>
>
> Xobni and ExtraOutlook don't get along.  Not surprising, the worst I can
say
> about that is the Xobni boings and pops up a warning that it can't run
> twice.  I don't expect Xobni to program around it, since ExtraOutlook is
> very commonly used.
>
>
>
> But, Xobni is setting messages to read just for clicking on them (no
preview
> pane enabled).  And in one case, all 15 or so unread messages in a Public
> Folder went read at once, and I'm pretty sure I didn't click on each
> message.  I poked around looking for "don't mark messages as read" in the
> Xobni options and not finding it, I send a report to tech support.
>
>
>
> Just now while writing this message, 3-4 other unread messages in my
> NTSYSADMIN public folder became read.  Not good.  Unread status tells me I
> need to look at it.  Messages going unread by themselves isn't something I
> can tolerate for very long.
>
>
>
> Carl
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


Re: In-house instant messaging server

2008-04-24 Thread Phil Brutsche
I'll second that

Written in Java and runs anywhere you can get Sun's JVM (1.5 or newer)

However, for large deployments (thousands of end users) it can be a
resource pig.

Troy Meyer wrote:
> http://www.igniterealtime.org/projects/openfire/index.jsp
> 
> Openfire is one open source IM server that will integrate with
> LDAP/AD and supports any Jabber capable client (pidgin included).
> 
> We have one in test and it seems nice, but cant testify to large
> scale usage.

-- 

Phil Brutsche
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


Re: How to easily identify wireless authentication method??

2008-04-24 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Good recommendation.  +1

If you have a Windows Mobile phone with WiFi, take a look at WiFiFoFum2.


On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23 Apr 2008 at 16:20, cs  wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello all,
> > Does anyone know of any tools/scripts that run from a website that will
> > tell an IT luddite what wireless authentication method they're using,
> > i.e. WEP (Open/Shared), WPA, WPA2, etc.?
> >
> > Hope that makes sense.
>
> Look at the wireless tools at nirsoft.net.  Not web-based, but they are
> portable in that you can carry them on a USB stick or download them, unZIP
> them, and run them without admin privs.
>
> I use "WirelessKeyView: Recover lost WEP/WPA key stored by Wireless Zero
> Configuration service" when I'm working on client laptops.
>http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/wireless_key.html
>
> "WirelessNetView - Monitor wireless networks on your area" is also very useful
> when scanning an area for WLANs.
>http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/wireless_network_view.html
>
> HTH
>
> --
> Angus Scott-Fleming
> GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
> 1-520-290-5038
> +---+
>
>
>
>
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~
>



-- 
ME2

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: In-house instant messaging server

2008-04-24 Thread Mark A. Ross
Check this one out...it's what we use.

http://www.akeni.com/en/home/home.php


Mark

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:06 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: In-house instant messaging server

Jabber

Thanks,

Jeremy Phillips
Senior Messaging Engineer
Azaleos Corporation
T: 206.926.1945
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: In-house instant messaging server


Does anyone know offhand if there a low cost or open-source server
software
out there which can act as an IM server?   Probably any protocol that
the
Pidgin client can use would be fine.  LDAP integration would be a big
plus,
for AD integration.

I've looked into the offerings from MS and their servers seem too
expensive
for a small biz.


Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107





~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: In-house instant messaging server

2008-04-24 Thread Jeremy Phillips
Jabber

Thanks,

Jeremy Phillips
Senior Messaging Engineer
Azaleos Corporation
T: 206.926.1945
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: In-house instant messaging server


Does anyone know offhand if there a low cost or open-source server software
out there which can act as an IM server?   Probably any protocol that the
Pidgin client can use would be fine.  LDAP integration would be a big plus,
for AD integration.

I've looked into the offerings from MS and their servers seem too expensive
for a small biz.


Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107





~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


Re: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on SATA disks

2008-04-24 Thread James Kerr

I used this one a few years ago when I needed to resize some partitions.


Paragon Partition Manager
http://www.partition-manager.com/

James

-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:50 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on SATA
disks

To clarify, I'm really looking for a purchasable downloadable solution
with support. Nothing fancy, with server-side nonsense, just NTFS
partition support.



From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 24 April 2008 16:07

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on SATA
disks



You bet gparted rocks.

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Matthew W. Ross
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

GPartd LiveCD, or Knoppix running QTPartD

http://gparted.sourceforge.net/livecd.php

Hope that helps.

--Matt Ross


- Original Message -
From: Oliver Marshall
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 24 Apr 2008
07:37:18 -0700
Subject: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on
SATA disks



Can anyone recommend a bootable CD based product that will happily
resize NTFS partitions on SATA disks/controllers ?



I've tried loads including Zabbix Live, Ubuntu Live, Ultimate Boot

Disk

(contains tones none of which wanna work).



Anything I can pay for affordable and download quickly ?



Olly






~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~






~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


Re: In-house instant messaging server

2008-04-24 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 24 Apr 2008 at 14:03, Phillip Partipilo  wrote:

> 
> Does anyone know offhand if there a low cost or open-source server software
> out there which can act as an IM server?   Probably any protocol that the
> Pidgin client can use would be fine.  LDAP integration would be a big plus,
> for AD integration.
> 
> I've looked into the offerings from MS and their servers seem too expensive
> for a small biz.


Server Software | Jabber.org
http://www.jabber.org/servers
--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: In-house instant messaging server

2008-04-24 Thread Barsodi.John
http://www.jivesoftware.com/products/openfire

-Original Message-
From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: In-house instant messaging server

IRC an option?

Christopher J. Bosak
Vector Company
c. 847.603.4673
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."
- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me


-Original Message-
From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 13:03 hrs
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: In-house instant messaging server


Does anyone know offhand if there a low cost or open-source server
software
out there which can act as an IM server?   Probably any protocol that
the
Pidgin client can use would be fine.  LDAP integration would be a big
plus,
for AD integration.

I've looked into the offerings from MS and their servers seem too
expensive
for a small biz.

 
Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107
 
 



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: In-house instant messaging server

2008-04-24 Thread Troy Meyer
http://www.igniterealtime.org/projects/openfire/index.jsp

Openfire is one open source IM server that will integrate with LDAP/AD and 
supports any Jabber capable client (pidgin included).

We have one in test and it seems nice, but cant testify to large scale usage.

-troy

-Original Message-
From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: In-house instant messaging server


Does anyone know offhand if there a low cost or open-source server software
out there which can act as an IM server?   Probably any protocol that the
Pidgin client can use would be fine.  LDAP integration would be a big plus,
for AD integration.

I've looked into the offerings from MS and their servers seem too expensive
for a small biz.


Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107





~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: In-house instant messaging server

2008-04-24 Thread Andy Ognenoff
Depending on your security/reporting/compliance requirements - I've had good
luck with the Jabber Virtual Appliance (free). I don't believe it has AD
integration though but I didn't explore that to much.

http://www.vmware.com/appliances/directory/248

 - Andy O.

>-Original Message-
>From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:03 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: In-house instant messaging server
>
>
>Does anyone know offhand if there a low cost or open-source server software
>out there which can act as an IM server?   Probably any protocol that the
>Pidgin client can use would be fine.  LDAP integration would be a big plus,
>for AD integration.
>
>I've looked into the offerings from MS and their servers seem too expensive
>for a small biz.


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: In-house instant messaging server

2008-04-24 Thread Christopher J. Bosak
IRC an option?

Christopher J. Bosak
Vector Company
c. 847.603.4673
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."
- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me


-Original Message-
From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 13:03 hrs
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: In-house instant messaging server


Does anyone know offhand if there a low cost or open-source server software
out there which can act as an IM server?   Probably any protocol that the
Pidgin client can use would be fine.  LDAP integration would be a big plus,
for AD integration.

I've looked into the offerings from MS and their servers seem too expensive
for a small biz.

 
Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107
 
 



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: Xobni issues and invites

2008-04-24 Thread Free, Bob
Interesting, I was going to just say much the same thing. When I first
looked at this message I saw 10 from you and thought just that, I know I
have more from Tim than that. I took a quick look at the list and it
showed recent stuff and some as old as 5 years so it had *some* from
both the ost and pst. I got distracted by something else and looked back
and it showed 33...weird.

So then for yuks I tried searching with WDS for "From:Evans" and it
showed none and when I went back to the inbox the xobni bar went
completely blank, like sombody painted over it with white-out...lol 

-Original Message-
From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Xobni issues and invites

I've done that that too, even let it synchronize over night, but it is
still incomplete. For example, it's only showing 8 messages from you and
I know I've saved way more than that from you. I'm too lazy to count,
but I'd bet its 10 times that many over the years.

...Tim


> -Original Message-
> From: Free, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:18 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Xobni issues and invites
> 
> My bad, I went and read the FAQ (which I just copy/pasted below bc I
am
> inherently lazy...I mean efficient) when I had the same experience 
> with old messages after installation, what I found in the UI now that
I
> retrace my steps was the synchronize choice on the menu, I chose that 
> and went to lunch and everything seemed to be there when I got back.
> Sorry to mislead you.
> 
> 
> 
> From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 7:48 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Xobni issues and invites
> 
> 
> 
> Interesting. I don't have a "Index All Mail" option on my xobni menu:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ...Tim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> 
> > From: Free, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 7:43 AM
> 
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> 
> > Subject: RE: Xobni issues and invites
> 
> >
> 
> > http://www.xobni.com/support/faq?cat=Mail%20Indexing
> 
> >
> 
> > It doesn't index everything right away and it will only sync message
> 
> > bodies for the last 60 days of emails unless you explicitly choose
> 
> > "Index All Mail" from the Xobni menu.
> 
> >
> 
> > I did that the day I installed it and went to lunch and voila...I
can
> 
> > find WL's emails from 9 years ago [1]
> 
> >
> 
> > [1] hi william
> 
> >
> 
> > -Original Message-
> 
> > From: WJH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 7:29 AM
> 
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> 
> > Subject: RE: Xobni issues and invites
> 
> >
> 
> > I did notice outlook being a bit laggy afterwards, but I do have
> quite
> 
> > a
> 
> > large, unkempt inbox.
> 
> >
> 
> > I was a bit dissapointed that it began building conversations with
> 
> > messages I received after the installation.  I expected it to be
able
> 
> > to
> 
> > do this for previous messages since it scanned and indexed the
inbox.
> 
> > Did others have the same result?
> 
> >
> 
> > Bill
> 
> > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> 
> > ~   ~
> 
> >
> 
> > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> 
> > ~   ~
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


In-house instant messaging server

2008-04-24 Thread Phillip Partipilo

Does anyone know offhand if there a low cost or open-source server software
out there which can act as an IM server?   Probably any protocol that the
Pidgin client can use would be fine.  LDAP integration would be a big plus,
for AD integration.

I've looked into the offerings from MS and their servers seem too expensive
for a small biz.

 
Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107
 
 



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on SATA disks

2008-04-24 Thread Terry Dickson
I have done this with Ghost several times.  However I have not dealt
with other controllers or Raid while doing this.  

-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on SATA
disks

To clarify, I'm really looking for a purchasable downloadable solution
with support. Nothing fancy, with server-side nonsense, just NTFS
partition support.

 

From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 24 April 2008 16:07
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on SATA
disks

 

You bet gparted rocks.

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Matthew W. Ross
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

GPartd LiveCD, or Knoppix running QTPartD

http://gparted.sourceforge.net/livecd.php

Hope that helps.

--Matt Ross


- Original Message -
From: Oliver Marshall
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 24 Apr 2008
07:37:18 -0700
Subject: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on
SATA disks


> Can anyone recommend a bootable CD based product that will happily
> resize NTFS partitions on SATA disks/controllers ?
>
>
>
> I've tried loads including Zabbix Live, Ubuntu Live, Ultimate Boot
Disk
> (contains tones none of which wanna work).
>
>
>
> Anything I can pay for affordable and download quickly ?
>
>
>
> Olly
>
>
>

> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

 




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on SATA disks

2008-04-24 Thread Matthew W. Ross
I agree whole heartedly.

And that's why I avoid those fake RAID controllers. Sm:)e.

But yeah... if Windows PE can load the drivers, then you could do the diskpart 
way of doing it, and it would be supported. Didn't think of that. Good to have 
more options!

--Matt Ross

- Original Message -
From: Joseph L. Casale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 24 Apr 2008
09:34:34 -0700
Subject: RE: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions
on SATA disks


> Problem with those are the silly things people do in the windows world with
> fake raid and some el cheapo controllers. I used to use a knoppix and some
> other disc untill PE 2.0 came out for free. These nix distros don't support
> those fake raid and some controllers that only windows do period, you can't
> just modprobe/insmod them as they dont make drivers:/.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Matthew W. Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:02 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on SATA disks
> 
> GPartd LiveCD, or Knoppix running QTPartD
> 
> http://gparted.sourceforge.net/livecd.php
> 
> Hope that helps.
> 
> --Matt Ross
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: Oliver Marshall
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thu, 24 Apr 2008
> 07:37:18 -0700
> Subject: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on
> SATA disks
> 
> 
> > Can anyone recommend a bootable CD based product that will happily
> > resize NTFS partitions on SATA disks/controllers ?
> >
> >
> >
> > I've tried loads including Zabbix Live, Ubuntu Live, Ultimate Boot Disk
> > (contains tones none of which wanna work).
> >
> >
> >
> > Anything I can pay for affordable and download quickly ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Olly
> >
> >
> >
> > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> > ~   ~
> 
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~
> 
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~
> 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: Group Policy - Screensaver

2008-04-24 Thread Christopher Boggs
I can't remember exactly - but I think you are looking for loop-back
policy processing..

 

This site seems to explain it better than I can...

 

http://grouppolicy.editme.com/Loopback

 

-cb



From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Group Policy - Screensaver

 

I have a group of remote users who log in to their local machines and
then to a terminal server to do most of their work.  The user accounts
have a domain group policy applied which enforces a screensaver after xx
minutes.  That's fine, but after they log back in they also have to log
in to the terminal server.

 

Is there a simple way to have the screensaver policy only apply to their
local sessions and not their term server sessions?

 

 

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

727.572.7076  x388

  

 

 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~<>

RE: dumb terminal

2008-04-24 Thread Karsten, Matthew
We use WYSE S10s and S90s depending on the requirements of the user.

Matt

 

 

From: Tom Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: dumb terminal

 

We use the Wyse V90s - Embedded Windows.  Very easy to use and set up 
especially with the Enterprise Manager

>>> "Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 4/24/2008 11:06 AM >>>

That is the one I am familiar with and I have seen a lot of Neoware devices 
also.

 

 

Webster

 

From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: RE: dumb terminal

 

Wyse S90’s here. Swear by them. Affordable, solid, great server side management 
app thats free (for workgroup use).

 

We also use several various Linux based ones. Also good, with more technical 
features, but tend to suffer from poor build quality.

 

From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: dumb terminal

 

Looking at getting a dumb terminal for my private Citrix/Terminal Server lab.  
For those that use them, what brand and model do you use the most of?

 

Thanks

 

 

Webster

 

 
 
 

 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the 
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message. 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: Looking for low cost VMWare aware backup solution...

2008-04-24 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 23 Apr 2008 at 13:23, Tom Strader  wrote:

> Matt,
> 
> I use "HOBOCOPY". It uses shadowcopy to backup the VM's in real-time
> without taking them offline.
> Works Great.
> 
> http://swik.net/VSS+HoboCopy

FWIW, better URL:

Hobo Copy
http://www.pluralsight.com/wiki/default.aspx/Craig/HoboCopy.html


--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


Re: Looking for wall jack extender

2008-04-24 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 23 Apr 2008 at 10:51, Tom Miller  wrote:

> 
> Hi Folks: 
> 
> I'm looking for something that can increase my wall single jack to more 
> than one drop. So far we've been using the cool 3COM IntelleJack Switch 
> NJ220 
> http://www.3com.com/products/en_US/detail.jsp?tab=features&pathtype=purc
> hase&sku=WEBBNCNJ220SYSas needed. There are fairly pricey though and a 
> bit overkill for what I need now. I have a project to replace many 
> personal printers with newer standardized models. The new printers will 
> be networked so I can track usage. In some offices I'll need another 
> drop. Instead of using one of the NJ220 switches, are there any cheaper 
> options?

Google Products has used IJ-200s for $39 if that helps.

--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


Re: How to easily identify wireless authentication method??

2008-04-24 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 23 Apr 2008 at 16:20, cs  wrote:

> 
> Hello all, 
> Does anyone know of any tools/scripts that run from a website that will 
> tell an IT luddite what wireless authentication method they're using, 
> i.e. WEP (Open/Shared), WPA, WPA2, etc.? 
> 
> Hope that makes sense. 

Look at the wireless tools at nirsoft.net.  Not web-based, but they are 
portable in that you can carry them on a USB stick or download them, unZIP 
them, and run them without admin privs.

I use "WirelessKeyView: Recover lost WEP/WPA key stored by Wireless Zero 
Configuration service" when I'm working on client laptops.
http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/wireless_key.html

"WirelessNetView - Monitor wireless networks on your area" is also very useful 
when scanning an area for WLANs.
http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/wireless_network_view.html

HTH

--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Christopher J. Bosak
That should read, "and give them crap about it". 

 

*sigh*

 

Christopher J. Bosak

Vector Company

c. 847.603.4673

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."

- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me

 

From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:41 hrs
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

I swear by Intel. I really do. I still give people I know who use AMD crap
about it. I did have one time where I owned a laptop with an AMD processor.
I returned it in a week and got an Intel powered one. Same specs, just an
Intel processor instead of an AMD. What a world of difference it made.

 

Christopher J. Bosak

Vector Company

c. 847.603.4673

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."

- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me

 

From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:35 hrs
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

That's interesting.  I had no idea the difference could be so dramatic
between AMD and Intel.

 

From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

Hey Rod, if you bought a new laptop then your Intel proc is x64 capable.
As Chris already replied, going from the mobile AMD to the mobile Intel
platform is probably what made the difference.

 

From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

The HP's are good laptops.  However, I recently had to run out and buy a
brand new one, due to the old one's hard drive locking up due to heat.

 

I had x64 Vista on the old laptop, opted for 32-bit Intel processor this
time, and I can see an amazing difference.  The 32-bit processor and OS
actually runs applications better.

 

Here's my rant about it.

 

http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/rtrent/archive/2008/04/21/what-an-amazing-dif
ference-in-computers.aspx 

 

From: Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

Here are the specs of a new laptop. my questions:

 

64Bit Vista on HP Laptop?  Really necessary with only GB in the system?  I
have tried 64Bit 2003 a while back and had issues, but this was about 3
years ago.

 

Dual hard drive configured at RAID 1?  Hmmm. Double Trouble if you ask me.

 

- HP Pavilion dv9700t Entertainment CTO NB

- Upgrade to Genuine Windows Vista Home Premium with Service Pack 1 (64-bit)

- Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 Duo Processor T8300 (2.40 GHz, 3 MB L2 Cache, 800MHz
FSB)

- 17.0" diagonal WSXGA+ High-Definition HP BrightView Widescreen Display
(1680 x 1050)

- 2GB DDR2 System Memory (2 Dimm)

- 256MB NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS

- FREE Upgrade to HP Imprint (Radiance) + Fingerprint Reader + Webcam +
Microphone

- Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 4965AGN Network Connection and Bluetooth(TM)

- 240GB 7200RPM SATA Dual Hard Drive (120GB x 2)

- LightScribe SuperMulti 8X DVD+/-RW with Double Layer Support

- No TV Tuner w/remote control

- High Capacity 8 Cell Lithium Ion Battery

- Norton Internet Security(TM) 2008 - 36 Month Subscription

- FREE Upgrade to Computrace LoJack for Laptops, Four Years from LoJack for!
Laptops, Three Years

- Microsoft(R) Office Small Business 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: Xobni issues and invites

2008-04-24 Thread Carl Houseman
It's weird. Sometimes just one message I haven't opened will turn read,
other times it's 2 or 3 all at once.  I'll open ONE message and when I close
it, a few have changed from unread to read.   I wonder if it has to do with
reading the PF's in conversation view, as most of my other (non-mailing-list
non-PF) folders are org'd by date.

Carl

-Original Message-
From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Xobni issues and invites

I'm seeing the same thing. It looks like it's only indexing new
messages. BTW, Carl, I do you public folders (but not to read this list)
and I haven't seen any of the marking as read issues you reported - in
my inbox or in the public folders, although I do have a Vista/Outlook
2007 that exhibits that behavior without xobni installed. Here, I'm
running Outlook 2007 on XPSP2.

...Tim


> -Original Message-
> From: WL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:18 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Xobni issues and invites
> 
> ExtraOutlook is the problem there, of course, but you knew that. (I
> don't find it all that 'common' either. Not sure if that is what you
> meant.).
> 
> >>Messages going unread by themselves isn't something I can tolerate
> for very long
> 
> I have been using Xobni for months across multiple accounts and
> multiple versions.  I have not seen any messages marked unread as a
> result. I am going to look at that closer.
> I do hope they bring back some of the features that were in the
> earlier betas, though.
> 
> http://www.slipstick.com/reviews/xobni.htm
> 
> William
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Carl Houseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Monday I put my name on the list at the Xobni website and got
> approved less
> > than 24 hours later.  It may have had something to do with my using
> Vista
> > and Outlook 2007.
> >
> >
> >
> > So I have 6 invitations if anyone wants one, but ask in PRIVATE mail
> only.
> >
> >
> >
> > Installed it this morning and already I have "issues".
> >
> >
> >
> > Xobni and ExtraOutlook don't get along.  Not surprising, the worst I
> can say
> > about that is the Xobni boings and pops up a warning that it can't
> run
> > twice.  I don't expect Xobni to program around it, since
ExtraOutlook
> is
> > very commonly used.
> >
> >
> >
> > But, Xobni is setting messages to read just for clicking on them (no
> preview
> > pane enabled).  And in one case, all 15 or so unread messages in a
> Public
> > Folder went read at once, and I'm pretty sure I didn't click on each
> > message.  I poked around looking for "don't mark messages as read"
in
> the
> > Xobni options and not finding it, I send a report to tech support.
> >
> >
> >
> > Just now while writing this message, 3-4 other unread messages in my
> > NTSYSADMIN public folder became read.  Not good.  Unread status
tells
> me I
> > need to look at it.  Messages going unread by themselves isn't
> something I
> > can tolerate for very long.
> >
> >
> >
> > Carl
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Christopher J. Bosak
I swear by Intel. I really do. I still give people I know who use AMD crap
about it. I did have one time where I owned a laptop with an AMD processor.
I returned it in a week and got an Intel powered one. Same specs, just an
Intel processor instead of an AMD. What a world of difference it made.

 

Christopher J. Bosak

Vector Company

c. 847.603.4673

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."

- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me

 

From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:35 hrs
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

That's interesting.  I had no idea the difference could be so dramatic
between AMD and Intel.

 

From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

Hey Rod, if you bought a new laptop then your Intel proc is x64 capable.
As Chris already replied, going from the mobile AMD to the mobile Intel
platform is probably what made the difference.

 

From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

The HP's are good laptops.  However, I recently had to run out and buy a
brand new one, due to the old one's hard drive locking up due to heat.

 

I had x64 Vista on the old laptop, opted for 32-bit Intel processor this
time, and I can see an amazing difference.  The 32-bit processor and OS
actually runs applications better.

 

Here's my rant about it.

 

http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/rtrent/archive/2008/04/21/what-an-amazing-dif
ference-in-computers.aspx 

 

From: Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

Here are the specs of a new laptop. my questions:

 

64Bit Vista on HP Laptop?  Really necessary with only GB in the system?  I
have tried 64Bit 2003 a while back and had issues, but this was about 3
years ago.

 

Dual hard drive configured at RAID 1?  Hmmm. Double Trouble if you ask me.

 

- HP Pavilion dv9700t Entertainment CTO NB

- Upgrade to Genuine Windows Vista Home Premium with Service Pack 1 (64-bit)

- Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 Duo Processor T8300 (2.40 GHz, 3 MB L2 Cache, 800MHz
FSB)

- 17.0" diagonal WSXGA+ High-Definition HP BrightView Widescreen Display
(1680 x 1050)

- 2GB DDR2 System Memory (2 Dimm)

- 256MB NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS

- FREE Upgrade to HP Imprint (Radiance) + Fingerprint Reader + Webcam +
Microphone

- Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 4965AGN Network Connection and Bluetooth(TM)

- 240GB 7200RPM SATA Dual Hard Drive (120GB x 2)

- LightScribe SuperMulti 8X DVD+/-RW with Double Layer Support

- No TV Tuner w/remote control

- High Capacity 8 Cell Lithium Ion Battery

- Norton Internet Security(TM) 2008 - 36 Month Subscription

- FREE Upgrade to Computrace LoJack for Laptops, Four Years from LoJack for!
Laptops, Three Years

- Microsoft(R) Office Small Business 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on SATA disks

2008-04-24 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Problem with those are the silly things people do in the windows world with 
fake raid and some el cheapo controllers. I used to use a knoppix and some 
other disc untill PE 2.0 came out for free. These nix distros don't support 
those fake raid and some controllers that only windows do period, you can't 
just modprobe/insmod them as they dont make drivers:/.




From: Matthew W. Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on SATA disks

GPartd LiveCD, or Knoppix running QTPartD

http://gparted.sourceforge.net/livecd.php

Hope that helps.

--Matt Ross

- Original Message -
From: Oliver Marshall
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 24 Apr 2008
07:37:18 -0700
Subject: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on
SATA disks


> Can anyone recommend a bootable CD based product that will happily
> resize NTFS partitions on SATA disks/controllers ?
>
>
>
> I've tried loads including Zabbix Live, Ubuntu Live, Ultimate Boot Disk
> (contains tones none of which wanna work).
>
>
>
> Anything I can pay for affordable and download quickly ?
>
>
>
> Olly
>
>
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Rod Trent
That's interesting.  I had no idea the difference could be so dramatic
between AMD and Intel.

 

From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

Hey Rod, if you bought a new laptop then your Intel proc is x64 capable.
As Chris already replied, going from the mobile AMD to the mobile Intel
platform is probably what made the difference.

 

From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

The HP's are good laptops.  However, I recently had to run out and buy a
brand new one, due to the old one's hard drive locking up due to heat.

 

I had x64 Vista on the old laptop, opted for 32-bit Intel processor this
time, and I can see an amazing difference.  The 32-bit processor and OS
actually runs applications better.

 

Here's my rant about it.

 

http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/rtrent/archive/2008/04/21/what-an-amazing-dif
ference-in-computers.aspx 

 

From: Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

Here are the specs of a new laptop. my questions:

 

64Bit Vista on HP Laptop?  Really necessary with only GB in the system?  I
have tried 64Bit 2003 a while back and had issues, but this was about 3
years ago.

 

Dual hard drive configured at RAID 1?  Hmmm. Double Trouble if you ask me.

 

- HP Pavilion dv9700t Entertainment CTO NB

- Upgrade to Genuine Windows Vista Home Premium with Service Pack 1 (64-bit)

- Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 Duo Processor T8300 (2.40 GHz, 3 MB L2 Cache, 800MHz
FSB)

- 17.0" diagonal WSXGA+ High-Definition HP BrightView Widescreen Display
(1680 x 1050)

- 2GB DDR2 System Memory (2 Dimm)

- 256MB NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS

- FREE Upgrade to HP Imprint (Radiance) + Fingerprint Reader + Webcam +
Microphone

- Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 4965AGN Network Connection and Bluetooth(TM)

- 240GB 7200RPM SATA Dual Hard Drive (120GB x 2)

- LightScribe SuperMulti 8X DVD+/-RW with Double Layer Support

- No TV Tuner w/remote control

- High Capacity 8 Cell Lithium Ion Battery

- Norton Internet Security(TM) 2008 - 36 Month Subscription

- FREE Upgrade to Computrace LoJack for Laptops, Four Years from LoJack for!
Laptops, Three Years

- Microsoft(R) Office Small Business 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on SATA disks

2008-04-24 Thread RichardMcClary
Have you checked Acronis Disk Director?
--
Richard McClary, Systems Administrator
ASPCA Knowledge Management
1717 S Philo Rd, Ste 36, Urbana, IL  61802
217-337-9761
http://www.aspca.org


"Oliver Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/24/2008 
10:49:33 AM:

> To clarify, I’m really looking for a purchasable downloadable 
> solution with support. Nothing fancy, with server-side nonsense, 
> just NTFS partition support.
> 
> From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 24 April 2008 16:07
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on SATA 
disks
> 
> You bet gparted rocks.
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Matthew W. Ross 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
> GPartd LiveCD, or Knoppix running QTPartD
> 
> http://gparted.sourceforge.net/livecd.php
> 
> Hope that helps.
> 
> --Matt Ross
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: Oliver Marshall
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thu, 24 Apr 2008
> 07:37:18 -0700
> Subject: Bootable partition resizer for NTFS partitions on
> SATA disks
> 
> 
> > Can anyone recommend a bootable CD based product that will happily
> > resize NTFS partitions on SATA disks/controllers ?
> >
> >
> >
> > I've tried loads including Zabbix Live, Ubuntu Live, Ultimate Boot 
Disk
> > (contains tones none of which wanna work).
> >
> >
> >
> > Anything I can pay for affordable and download quickly ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Olly
> >
> >
> >
> > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> > ~   ~
> 
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~
> 
> 
> 

> 
> 

> 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: Xobni issues and invites

2008-04-24 Thread Tim Evans
I've done that that too, even let it synchronize over night, but it is
still incomplete. For example, it's only showing 8 messages from you and
I know I've saved way more than that from you. I'm too lazy to count,
but I'd bet its 10 times that many over the years.

...Tim


> -Original Message-
> From: Free, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:18 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Xobni issues and invites
> 
> My bad, I went and read the FAQ (which I just copy/pasted below bc I
am
> inherently lazy...I mean efficient) when I had the same experience
> with old messages after installation, what I found in the UI now that
I
> retrace my steps was the synchronize choice on the menu, I chose that
> and went to lunch and everything seemed to be there when I got back.
> Sorry to mislead you.
> 
> 
> 
> From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 7:48 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Xobni issues and invites
> 
> 
> 
> Interesting. I don't have a "Index All Mail" option on my xobni menu:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ...Tim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> 
> > From: Free, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 7:43 AM
> 
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> 
> > Subject: RE: Xobni issues and invites
> 
> >
> 
> > http://www.xobni.com/support/faq?cat=Mail%20Indexing
> 
> >
> 
> > It doesn't index everything right away and it will only sync message
> 
> > bodies for the last 60 days of emails unless you explicitly choose
> 
> > "Index All Mail" from the Xobni menu.
> 
> >
> 
> > I did that the day I installed it and went to lunch and voila...I
can
> 
> > find WL's emails from 9 years ago [1]
> 
> >
> 
> > [1] hi william
> 
> >
> 
> > -Original Message-
> 
> > From: WJH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 7:29 AM
> 
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> 
> > Subject: RE: Xobni issues and invites
> 
> >
> 
> > I did notice outlook being a bit laggy afterwards, but I do have
> quite
> 
> > a
> 
> > large, unkempt inbox.
> 
> >
> 
> > I was a bit dissapointed that it began building conversations with
> 
> > messages I received after the installation.  I expected it to be
able
> 
> > to
> 
> > do this for previous messages since it scanned and indexed the
inbox.
> 
> > Did others have the same result?
> 
> >
> 
> > Bill
> 
> > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> 
> > ~   ~
> 
> >
> 
> > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> 
> > ~   ~
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: Xobni issues and invites

2008-04-24 Thread Rod Trent
That's a big but.just sayin'

 

From: wjh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Xobni issues and invites

 

Heh, I know my email inbox is a bit ridiculous, but it actually still works
fine.  I have no email/outlook issues.  I know we have end users that end up
with huge mailboxes and we always try to help them resolve email perfomance
issues.  

My laptop is magical though.  I have users clamoring to upgrade from their
t43 to a T60 or T61.  I'm chugging along with my hand-me-down T40 and  any
program or ISO i think I might ever need loaded on it.

Bill

Jon Harris wrote: 

I find this thread funny as I just had to fix a (l)users Outlook yesterday
because it was having issues with getting new email.  He had mail going back
to 1999 in his Inbox and over 2000 just in one year alone.  I cleaned up the
Inbox moved all of his old mail from 2006 thru 1999 to a seperate PST file
and he is much happier now.  I told him that was what folder structures were
for as well as rules.  I doubt he will listen, he doesn't most of the time.

 

Jon

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:02 AM, John Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 I personally chastise any user I find with over 10,000 messages in the
inbox - filing e-mail is not optional!

John W. Cook
System Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+


-Original Message-
From: wjh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:37 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: Re: Xobni issues and invites

Hmmm, I have over 21,000 messages in my inbox.  I wonder if that would
have caused the conversations to not propagate.

Bill


Christopher J. Bosak wrote:
> I have conversations for before and after installation, and it was only
laggy for me during its first time setup.
>

> Christopher J. Bosak
> Vector Company
> c. 847.603.4673
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."
> - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me
>
>

> -Original Message-
> From: WJH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 09:29 hrs
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Xobni issues and invites
>
> I did notice outlook being a bit laggy afterwards, but I do have quite a
large, unkempt inbox.
>
> I was a bit dissapointed that it began building conversations with
messages I received after the installation.  I expected it to be able to do
this for previous messages since it scanned and indexed the inbox.  Did
others have the same result?
>
> Bill
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~
>
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~
>


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Christopher J. Bosak
Thank you. I completely agree!

 

Christopher J. Bosak

Vector Company

c. 847.603.4673

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

"You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."

- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me

 

From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:09 hrs
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

I swear up and down, no AMD notebooks in the organization, simply because
they suck compared to Intel.  Any of the dual core Centrinos will blow away
the x2AMD chips.  

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Rod Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

The HP's are good laptops.  However, I recently had to run out and buy a
brand new one, due to the old one's hard drive locking up due to heat.

 

I had x64 Vista on the old laptop, opted for 32-bit Intel processor this
time, and I can see an amazing difference.  The 32-bit processor and OS
actually runs applications better.

 

Here's my rant about it.

 

http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/rtrent/archive/2008/04/21/what-an-amazing-dif
ference-in-computers.aspx 

 

From: Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

Here are the specs of a new laptop. my questions:

 

64Bit Vista on HP Laptop?  Really necessary with only GB in the system?  I
have tried 64Bit 2003 a while back and had issues, but this was about 3
years ago.

 

Dual hard drive configured at RAID 1?  Hmmm. Double Trouble if you ask me.

 

- HP Pavilion dv9700t Entertainment CTO NB

- Upgrade to Genuine Windows Vista Home Premium with Service Pack 1 (64-bit)

- Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 Duo Processor T8300 (2.40 GHz, 3 MB L2 Cache, 800MHz
FSB)

- 17.0" diagonal WSXGA+ High-Definition HP BrightView Widescreen Display
(1680 x 1050)

- 2GB DDR2 System Memory (2 Dimm)

- 256MB NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS

- FREE Upgrade to HP Imprint (Radiance) + Fingerprint Reader + Webcam +
Microphone

- Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 4965AGN Network Connection and Bluetooth(TM)

- 240GB 7200RPM SATA Dual Hard Drive (120GB x 2)

- LightScribe SuperMulti 8X DVD+/-RW with Double Layer Support

- No TV Tuner w/remote control

- High Capacity 8 Cell Lithium Ion Battery

- Norton Internet Security(TM) 2008 - 36 Month Subscription

- FREE Upgrade to Computrace LoJack for Laptops, Four Years from LoJack for!
Laptops, Three Years

- Microsoft(R) Office Small Business 2007

 

 

 

 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

2008-04-24 Thread Bob Fronk
My results have been the exact opposite.  I have found the 64bit Vista
to run much faster.

 

Previously I had XP 32 bit on it, but recently decided to see if I could
get a performance gain.

 

Maybe the difference is the processors.  I am running a Core2Duo at 2.8
with 4GB Ram and 7200rpm 200GB HDD.

 

Bob Fronk

 

From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

Hey Rod, if you bought a new laptop then your Intel proc is x64 capable.
As Chris already replied, going from the mobile AMD to the mobile Intel
platform is probably what made the difference.

 

From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

The HP's are good laptops.  However, I recently had to run out and buy a
brand new one, due to the old one's hard drive locking up due to heat.

 

I had x64 Vista on the old laptop, opted for 32-bit Intel processor this
time, and I can see an amazing difference.  The 32-bit processor and OS
actually runs applications better.

 

Here's my rant about it...

 

http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/rtrent/archive/2008/04/21/what-an-amazing
-difference-in-computers.aspx 

 

From: Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 64Bit Vista on laptop?

 

Here are the specs of a new laptop... my questions:

 

64Bit Vista on HP Laptop?  Really necessary with only GB in the system?
I have tried 64Bit 2003 a while back and had issues, but this was about
3 years ago.

 

Dual hard drive configured at RAID 1?  Hmmm... Double Trouble if you ask
me.

 

- HP Pavilion dv9700t Entertainment CTO NB

- Upgrade to Genuine Windows Vista Home Premium with Service Pack 1
(64-bit)

- Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 Duo Processor T8300 (2.40 GHz, 3 MB L2 Cache,
800MHz FSB)

- 17.0" diagonal WSXGA+ High-Definition HP BrightView Widescreen Display
(1680 x 1050)

- 2GB DDR2 System Memory (2 Dimm)

- 256MB NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS

- FREE Upgrade to HP Imprint (Radiance) + Fingerprint Reader + Webcam +
Microphone

- Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 4965AGN Network Connection and Bluetooth(TM)

- 240GB 7200RPM SATA Dual Hard Drive (120GB x 2)

- LightScribe SuperMulti 8X DVD+/-RW with Double Layer Support

- No TV Tuner w/remote control

- High Capacity 8 Cell Lithium Ion Battery

- Norton Internet Security(TM) 2008 - 36 Month Subscription

- FREE Upgrade to Computrace LoJack for Laptops, Four Years from LoJack
for! Laptops, Three Years

- Microsoft(R) Office Small Business 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

RE: dumb terminal

2008-04-24 Thread Tom Miller
We use the Wyse V90s - Embedded Windows.  Very easy to use and set up
especially with the Enterprise Manager

>>> "Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 4/24/2008 11:06 AM >>>

That is the one I am familiar with and I have seen a lot of Neoware
devices also.
 
 
Webster
 

From:Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: RE: dumb terminal

 
Wyse S90’s here. Swear by them. Affordable, solid, great server side
management app thats free (for workgroup use).
 
We also use several various Linux based ones. Also good, with more
technical features, but tend to suffer from poor build quality.
 

From:Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: dumb terminal

 
Looking at getting a dumb terminal for my private Citrix/Terminal
Server lab.  For those that use them, what brand and model do you use
the most of?
 
Thanks
 
 
Webster




Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

Group Policy - Screensaver

2008-04-24 Thread Roger Wright
I have a group of remote users who log in to their local machines and
then to a terminal server to do most of their work.  The user accounts
have a domain group policy applied which enforces a screensaver after xx
minutes.  That's fine, but after they log back in they also have to log
in to the terminal server.

 

Is there a simple way to have the screensaver policy only apply to their
local sessions and not their term server sessions?

 

 

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

727.572.7076  x388

  

 

 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~<>

Re: color printer???

2008-04-24 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 15 Apr 2008 at 9:50, Phillip Partipilo  wrote:

> Samsung has a cheap and quiet color laser out there that is practically
> disposable and puts out reasonably good prints, with very cheap consumables. 

Got a recommended model number? Googling for "samsung color printer" turns up 
many models from CLP-300 to CLP660N to others ...

--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


RE: Remote Desktop Video issue

2008-04-24 Thread Webster
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Remote Desktop Video issue
> 
> Are you specifying the resolution in the RDP client?
> 
> Try the new RDP client 6.1?
> 
> That's a weird one.

The 6.1 Client is weird or the video problem is weird?


Webster


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


Re: color printer???

2008-04-24 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 15 Apr 2008 at 10:29, Phillip Partipilo  wrote:

> The crayon printers? Those do put out fantastic color prints, but do 
> scratch.  I have always wondered if you could get away with putting 
> actual Crayola crayons into them, their sticks dont seem too far off 
> from them.

FWIW the wax "ink" melts in Tucson during the summer if you leave anything 
printed in your car, leaving you with a block of paper instead of something 
useful.  Also, the local copy-shops won't copy stuff printed with this as it 
tends to deposit on the hot rollers in their document-feed copiers.


--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~


Re: Xobni issues and invites

2008-04-24 Thread wjh
Heh, I know my email inbox is a bit ridiculous, but it actually still 
works fine.  I have no email/outlook issues.  I know we have end users 
that end up with huge mailboxes and we always try to help them resolve 
email perfomance issues.

My laptop is magical though.  I have users clamoring to upgrade from 
their t43 to a T60 or T61.  I'm chugging along with my hand-me-down T40 
and  any program or ISO i think I might ever need loaded on it.

Bill

Jon Harris wrote:
> I find this thread funny as I just had to fix a (l)users Outlook 
> yesterday because it was having issues with getting new email.  He had 
> mail going back to 1999 in his Inbox and over 2000 just in one year 
> alone.  I cleaned up the Inbox moved all of his old mail from 2006 
> thru 1999 to a seperate PST file and he is much happier now.  I told 
> him that was what folder structures were for as well as rules.  I 
> doubt he will listen, he doesn't most of the time.
> Jon
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:02 AM, John Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > wrote:
>
>  I personally chastise any user I find with over 10,000 messages
> in the inbox - filing e-mail is not optional!
>
> John W. Cook
> System Administrator
> Partnership For Strong Families
> 315 SE 2nd Ave
> Gainesville, Fl 32601
> Office (352) 393-2741 x320
> Cell (352) 215-6944
> Fax (352) 393-2746
> MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wjh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:37 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Xobni issues and invites
>
> Hmmm, I have over 21,000 messages in my inbox.  I wonder if that would
> have caused the conversations to not propagate.
>
> Bill
>
>
> Christopher J. Bosak wrote:
> > I have conversations for before and after installation, and it
> was only laggy for me during its first time setup.
> >
> > Christopher J. Bosak
> > Vector Company
> > c. 847.603.4673
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >
> > "You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue."
> > - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: WJH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 09:29 hrs
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Xobni issues and invites
> >
> > I did notice outlook being a bit laggy afterwards, but I do have
> quite a large, unkempt inbox.
> >
> > I was a bit dissapointed that it began building conversations
> with messages I received after the installation.  I expected it to
> be able to do this for previous messages since it scanned and
> indexed the inbox.  Did others have the same result?
> >
> > Bill
> > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> > ~   ~
> >
> >
> > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> > ~   ~
> >
>
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~
>
> ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
> ~   ~
>
>


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~   ~

  1   2   >