SharePoint Web Server farms

[Doige, Clayton]

Hi there, yes I am being lazy, so apologies from the off. I am going to
google, but if anyone can point me to some step by step guides for
setting up W2K3 SharePoint (free version) in a farm (is this possible?)
I would be grateful J

 

Clayton Doige

IT Project Manager

CME Development Corporation

T: 020 7430 5355

M: 07949 255062

E:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

W:www.cetv-net.com  


__
This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information 
intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may 
contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt 
from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution 
of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or 
sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any 
attachments without retaining any copies. 
_
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: DL360 G5's and P400 controller

[Joseph L. Casale]

Cool, so is the P400 onboard, or can that be yanked?
Thanks!
jlc

From: Mousehunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 6:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DL360 G5's and P400 controller

DL360G5 do support P800.


From: Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2008 7:21:01
Subject: DL360 G5's and P400 controller
Anyone running these? I assume the P400 is onboard, I need a 1u that I can 
shove a P800 in to attach an external array to…

Thanks!
jlc







Importing contacts has never been 
easier..
Bring your friends over to Yahoo! Mail today!





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

OT: Double trouble

[James Rankin]

Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys
on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and
Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into
my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[Ziots, Edward]

OUSTANDING! Congratz

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +



From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: OT: Double trouble

[Jon Harris]

Congrats!  Enjoy them as much as possible!

Jon

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:14 AM, James Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys
> on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and
> Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into
> my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: OT: Double trouble

[David McSpadden]

Congrats!  What a great Christmas present.

 



From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Double trouble

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: OT: Double trouble

[Kevin Lundy]

Well done and congrats to you and your wife.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:14 AM, James Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys
> on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and
> Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into
> my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[Kelsay, Mark]

Great news.  Congratulations.

 

 

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 December 2008 13:14
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

 

Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin
boys on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received
James and Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to
collapse into my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__


** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com Limited ** 
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.  Registration no. 
310635.
Inspop.com Limited (also trading as "Confused.com") is registered in England 
and Wales at 2nd Floor, Friary House, Greyfriars Road, Cardiff, CF10 3AE (Reg. 
No. 03857130 ).  Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the 
individual and not necessarily the  company. This email and any files 
transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies  (which may contain 
alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential  and 
solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected 
by  attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the 
person responsible for  delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that 
you have received this email in error  and that any use is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this email in error please notify the Information Security 
Officer by  telephone on +44 (0) 29 2043 4252. Please then delete this email 
and destroy any copies of it.   This email has been swept for viruses before 
leaving our system.
Security Warning: Please note that this email has been created in the knowledge 
that Internet  email is not a 100% secure communications medium.  We advise 
that you understand and accept  this lack of security when emailing us.
Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and any 
attachments are free  from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good 
computing practice the recipient should  ensure they are actually virus free.
We may monitor the content of E-mails sent and received via our network for 
viruses or  unauthorised use and for other lawful business purposes.
 



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Messagelabs. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[Kelsay, Mark]

Just realized.  Same birthday as me, December 8th.

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 December 2008 13:14
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

 

Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin
boys on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received
James and Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to
collapse into my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__


** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com Limited ** 
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.  Registration no. 
310635.
Inspop.com Limited (also trading as "Confused.com") is registered in England 
and Wales at 2nd Floor, Friary House, Greyfriars Road, Cardiff, CF10 3AE (Reg. 
No. 03857130 ).  Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the 
individual and not necessarily the  company. This email and any files 
transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies  (which may contain 
alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential  and 
solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected 
by  attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the 
person responsible for  delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that 
you have received this email in error  and that any use is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this email in error please notify the Information Security 
Officer by  telephone on +44 (0) 29 2043 4252. Please then delete this email 
and destroy any copies of it.   This email has been swept for viruses before 
leaving our system.
Security Warning: Please note that this email has been created in the knowledge 
that Internet  email is not a 100% secure communications medium.  We advise 
that you understand and accept  this lack of security when emailing us.
Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and any 
attachments are free  from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good 
computing practice the recipient should  ensure they are actually virus free.
We may monitor the content of E-mails sent and received via our network for 
viruses or  unauthorised use and for other lawful business purposes.
 



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Messagelabs. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[Michael B. Smith]

Congrats!

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

 

Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys
on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and
Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into
my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: SharePoint Web Server farms

[Michael B. Smith]

Just follow the bouncing balls? :-P

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php

 

From: Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 4:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SharePoint Web Server farms

 

Hi there, yes I am being lazy, so apologies from the off. I am going to
google, but if anyone can point me to some step by step guides for setting
up W2K3 SharePoint (free version) in a farm (is this possible?) I would be
grateful J

 

Clayton Doige

IT Project Manager

CME Development Corporation

T: 020 7430 5355

M: 07949 255062

E:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

W:www.cetv-net.com


__
This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information
intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and
may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or
distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal
restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original
message and any attachments without retaining any copies.
_

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Double trouble

[Jon Harris]

Enjoy that while you can as well when they get home your sleep will be
departing for a while, at least mine did.

Jon

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:31 AM, James Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> hehe, will post some pics, once I get some sleep :-)
>
> 2008/12/9 Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>   No one cares about you and quit trying to steal his thunder.  J
>>
>>
>>
>> Congrats, James.  Y'all must be very special people to be blessed with
>> twins. Please post some pics when you get a free moment…in about three
>> months.
>>
>>
>>
>> Shook
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Kelsay, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:25 AM
>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* RE: Double trouble
>>
>>
>>
>> Just realized.  Same birthday as me, December 8th.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> *Sent:* 09 December 2008 13:14
>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* OT: Double trouble
>>
>>
>>
>> Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys
>> on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and
>> Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into
>> my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __
>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>> __
>>
>>  ** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com Limited **
>>
>>
>> Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registration
>> no. 310635.
>>
>> Inspop.com Limited (also trading as "Confused.com") is registered in
>> England and Wales at 2nd Floor, Friary House, Greyfriars Road, Cardiff, CF10
>> 3AE (Reg. No. 03857130 ). Any opinions expressed in this email are those of
>> the individual and not necessarily the company. This email and any files
>> transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may
>> contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are
>> confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may
>> contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the
>> intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended
>> recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that
>> any use is strictly prohibited.
>>
>> If you have received this email in error please notify the Information
>> Security Officer by telephone on +44 (0) 29 2043 4252. Please then delete
>> this email and destroy any copies of it. This email has been swept for
>> viruses before leaving our system.
>>
>> Security Warning: Please note that this email has been created in the
>> knowledge that Internet email is not a 100% secure communications medium. We
>> advise that you understand and accept this lack of security when emailing
>> us.
>>
>> Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and any
>> attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good
>> computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.
>>
>> We may monitor the content of E-mails sent and received via our network
>> for viruses or unauthorised use and for other lawful business purposes.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Messagelabs. The
>> service is powered by MessageLabs.
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[John Cook]

Congrats! Take lots of pics & vids and spend every moment you can with them, it 
goes faster than you think!

John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+

From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys on 
Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and Jacob 
who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into my bed 
for some much-needed rest. :-)






CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need 
to.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

SAN question

[Tom Miller]

Hello:
 
I'm looking at Dell Equallogic arrays PS5000 series.  The look pretty good for 
what we need here, but price is steep for my agency (starting at around $45k 
just for the disks and enclosure).  Anyone have any alternative vendors to 
suggest?  SAN will be used for databases, logging, maybe some file and print 
data.
 
Thanks,

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the 
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[Jeff Frantz]

Congratulations James!!!

-Jeff



From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble






~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: OT: Double trouble

[Tony Patton]

Congrats, and best wishes to you all.

Regards

Tony Patton
Desktop Operations Cavan
Quinn-Insurance Ltd
Ext 8078
Direct Dial +353 049 435 2878
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



"James Rankin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
09/12/2008 13:14
Please respond to
"NT System Admin Issues" 


To
"NT System Admin Issues" 
cc

Subject
OT: Double trouble






Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys 
on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and 
Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse 
into my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)
 
 



http://www.quinn-insurance.com

This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above.
The contents should not be copied nor disclosed to any other person.
Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the sender and
do not necessarily represent those of Quinn-insurance, unless otherwise
specifically stated . As internet communications are not secure,
Quinn-insurance is not responsible for the contents of this message nor
responsible for any change made to this message after it was sent by
the  original sender. Although virus scanning is used on all inbound
and outbound e-mail, we advise you to carry out your own virus check
before opening any attachment. We cannot accept liability for any
damage sustained as a result of any software viruses.



QUINN-Life Direct Limited and QUINN-Insurance Limited
are regulated by the Financial Regulator.
QUINN-Insurance Limited is authorised by the Financial Regulator
and regulated by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of
UK business.



QUINN-life direct Limited is registered in Ireland, registration number 292374.
QUINN-insurance Limited is registered in Ireland, registration number 204768.
QUINN-life direct Limited is a private company limited by shares 
Both companies have their head office at Dublin Road, Cavan, Co. Cavan. 



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: SAN question

[Andy Crellin]

We use HP MSAs (currently an MSA2012) - prices are very reasonable and
although not top-end they are pretty impressive.

Cheers,

Andy

 

Andy Crellin 
Technical Services Manager
Leonard Cheshire Disability
Telephone: 01904 479200
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Tom Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 December 2008 14:00
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SAN question

 

Hello:

 

I'm looking at Dell Equallogic arrays PS5000 series.  The look pretty
good for what we need here, but price is steep for my agency (starting
at around $45k just for the disks and enclosure).  Anyone have any
alternative vendors to suggest?  SAN will be used for databases,
logging, maybe some file and print data.

 

Thanks,

 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message. 

 

 

 


Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire 
Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message. Any 
views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not 
necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete it 
immediately.
 
Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered in 
England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England & Wales) and 
no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 66 South 
Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1RL.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[Sean Rector]

Congratulations, James!

 

Welcome James (Jr.?) and Jacob!

 

Sean Rector, MCSE

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

 

Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin
boys on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received
James and Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to
collapse into my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)

 

 

> 2008-2009 Season:  Tosca | The Barber of Seville
> Recently Announced:  Virginia Opera's 35th Anniversary Season 2009-2010
Visit us online at www.vaopera.org or call 1.866.OPERA.VA

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). Unless otherwise specified, persons unnamed as 
recipients may not read, distribute, copy or alter this e-mail. Any views or 
opinions expressed in this e-mail belong to the author and may not necessarily 
represent those of Virginia Opera. Although precautions have been taken to 
ensure no viruses are present, Virginia Opera cannot accept responsibility for 
any loss or damage that may arise from the use of this e-mail or attachments.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[René de Haas]

Congratulations, have fun (when you can) J

 

René

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

 

Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys on 
Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and Jacob 
who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into my bed 
for some much-needed rest. :-)

 

 


***
The information in this e-mail is confidential and intended solely for the 
individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  If you have received this e-mail 
in error please notify the sender by return e-mail delete this e-mail and 
refrain from any disclosure or action based on the information.
***

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: net nanny type software

[Brian Caisse]

Webroot Parental Controls (was Webroot Child Safe)

Has a free trial also.

 

Brian

 

From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 3:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: net nanny type software

 

You could start with OpenDNS to lock things down.

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:31 PM, James Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I recall there was mention on this list of a net nanny type software
that was good and was also free. Does anyone know what it was called?
Getting my son his first PC for Christmas ;-)

 

James 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[Kim Longenbaugh]

Congratulations on the birth of your boys!  I'm glad all went well.
Now, let the fun begin!

 



From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Double trouble

[James Rankin]

hehe, will post some pics, once I get some sleep :-)

2008/12/9 Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>  No one cares about you and quit trying to steal his thunder.  J
>
>
>
> Congrats, James.  Y'all must be very special people to be blessed with
> twins. Please post some pics when you get a free moment…in about three
> months.
>
>
>
> Shook
>
>
>
> *From:* Kelsay, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:25 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Double trouble
>
>
>
> Just realized.  Same birthday as me, December 8th.
>
>
>
> *From:* James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* 09 December 2008 13:14
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* OT: Double trouble
>
>
>
> Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys
> on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and
> Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into
> my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
> ** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com Limited **
>
> Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registration
> no. 310635.
>
> Inspop.com Limited (also trading as "Confused.com") is registered in
> England and Wales at 2nd Floor, Friary House, Greyfriars Road, Cardiff, CF10
> 3AE (Reg. No. 03857130 ). Any opinions expressed in this email are those of
> the individual and not necessarily the company. This email and any files
> transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may
> contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are
> confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may
> contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the
> intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended
> recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that
> any use is strictly prohibited.
>
> If you have received this email in error please notify the Information
> Security Officer by telephone on +44 (0) 29 2043 4252. Please then delete
> this email and destroy any copies of it. This email has been swept for
> viruses before leaving our system.
>
> Security Warning: Please note that this email has been created in the
> knowledge that Internet email is not a 100% secure communications medium. We
> advise that you understand and accept this lack of security when emailing
> us.
>
> Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and any
> attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good
> computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.
>
> We may monitor the content of E-mails sent and received via our network for
> viruses or unauthorised use and for other lawful business purposes.
>
>
>
>
> 
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Messagelabs. The
> service is powered by MessageLabs.
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Cisco ASDM & Java 11

[Brian Caisse]

You could use logmein.com products to temporary setup a session,  Have
them hook-up a serial cable to gain access to the device via console
access and enable the protocols.

 

From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 1:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASDM & Java 11

 

JAVA incompatibilities are really screwy ... I've got a client where my
only access to fix them remotely is via their 2003 terminal server, but
the version of JAVA doesn't play nice with  their PIX 501 , and last guy
working on them disabled telnet and outside interface access ...
argggh

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 



From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 12:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cisco ASDM & Java 11

For ASA users:  Be aware the latest Java updates (11 - I believe) breaks
the ASDM interface.  I've had to go back to a previous Java version.  

 

There's supposedly a fix or interim release on the Cisco website.

 

 

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

Evatone, Inc.

727.572.7076  x388

  

 

_

 

 

"Any change, even a change for the better, is always accompanied by
drawbacks and discomforts." - Arnold Bennett 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<>

Re: Double trouble

[James Kerr]

Great news, congrats man!

Enjoy that last bit of sleep while Moms in the hospital!

James
  - Original Message - 
  From: James Rankin 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:31 AM
  Subject: Re: Double trouble


  hehe, will post some pics, once I get some sleep :-)


  2008/12/9 Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

No one cares about you and quit trying to steal his thunder.  J 



Congrats, James.  Y'all must be very special people to be blessed with 
twins. Please post some pics when you get a free moment…in about three months.  



Shook



From: Kelsay, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:25 AM


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Double trouble



Just realized.  Same birthday as me, December 8th.



From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 December 2008 13:14
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble



Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys 
on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and 
Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into my 
bed for some much-needed rest. :-)



 
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__

** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com Limited ** 

Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registration 
no. 310635.

Inspop.com Limited (also trading as "Confused.com") is registered in 
England and Wales at 2nd Floor, Friary House, Greyfriars Road, Cardiff, CF10 
3AE (Reg. No. 03857130 ). Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the 
individual and not necessarily the company. This email and any files 
transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain 
alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and 
solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected 
by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the 
person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that 
you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. 

If you have received this email in error please notify the Information 
Security Officer by telephone on +44 (0) 29 2043 4252. Please then delete this 
email and destroy any copies of it. This email has been swept for viruses 
before leaving our system.

Security Warning: Please note that this email has been created in the 
knowledge that Internet email is not a 100% secure communications medium. We 
advise that you understand and accept this lack of security when emailing us.

Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and any 
attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good 
computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.

We may monitor the content of E-mails sent and received via our network for 
viruses or unauthorised use and for other lawful business purposes.





This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Messagelabs. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. 




 




 




 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[Andy Shook]

No one cares about you and quit trying to steal his thunder.  :)

Congrats, James.  Y'all must be very special people to be blessed with twins. 
Please post some pics when you get a free moment...in about three months.

Shook

From: Kelsay, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Double trouble

Just realized.  Same birthday as me, December 8th.

From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 December 2008 13:14
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys on 
Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and Jacob 
who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into my bed 
for some much-needed rest. :-)





__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com Limited **

Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registration no. 
310635.

Inspop.com Limited (also trading as "Confused.com") is registered in England 
and Wales at 2nd Floor, Friary House, Greyfriars Road, Cardiff, CF10 3AE (Reg. 
No. 03857130 ). Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the 
individual and not necessarily the company. This email and any files 
transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain 
alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and 
solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected 
by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the 
person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that 
you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this email in error please notify the Information Security 
Officer by telephone on +44 (0) 29 2043 4252. Please then delete this email and 
destroy any copies of it. This email has been swept for viruses before leaving 
our system.

Security Warning: Please note that this email has been created in the knowledge 
that Internet email is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that 
you understand and accept this lack of security when emailing us.

Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and any 
attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good 
computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.

We may monitor the content of E-mails sent and received via our network for 
viruses or unauthorised use and for other lawful business purposes.




This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Messagelabs. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. 






~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[David Mazzaccaro]

Congrats indeed!
 
 



From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble


Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin
boys on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received
James and Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to
collapse into my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)


 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: DL360 G5's and P400 controller

[Mousehunt]

Unfortunately you can't as it is integrated to the mainboard. You will need to 
buy an additional P800 but that will leave you with one PCI-E slot.





From: Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2008 9:09:58
Subject: RE: DL360 G5's and P400 controller

 
Cool, so is the P400 onboard, or
can that be yanked?
Thanks!
jlc
 
From:Mousehunt
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 6:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DL360 G5's and P400 controller
 
DL360G5
do support P800.
 


 
From:Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2008 7:21:01
Subject: DL360 G5's and P400 controller
Anyone running these? I assume the P400 is onboard, I need a
1u that I can shove a P800 in to attach an external array to…

Thanks!
jlc
 
 
 
 


 
Importing
contacts has never been easier..
Bring your friends over to Yahoo! Mail today!


  New Email names for you! 
Get the Email name you've always wanted on the new @ymail and @rocketmail. 
Hurry before someone else does!
http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/sg/
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[Roger Wright]

Great news!  Enjoy this tremendous blessing for the rest of your life!
(not that you'll be getting that much rest )

 

   

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

Evatone, Inc.

727.572.7076  x388

_  

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

 

Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin
boys on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received
James and Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to
collapse into my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: SharePoint Web Server farms

[David Lum]

+1, it's easy to *set it up*. The trick is to understand how you want to deploy 
it to the organization. Do you want multiple web apps, or just one? Multiple 
site collections, or just one collection with a bunch of team sites underneath? 
When it comes to restoring data you need to keep in mind how you design your 
SharePoint infrastructure has an effect on this as well as how granular you can 
delegate permissions. If you have a small company then it's not a problem, one 
site will likely cover your needs, but if you have 500+ users, you might need 
more than one. *Maybe*.

Think of SharePoint as you would Active Directory - you can get it going 
without any planning, but it will work better for you if you have it mapped out 
ahead of time.

I *highly* recommend a class on SharePoint before just throwing it out there. 
For me, SharePoint took more than just reading on the web to get my hands 
around some of the concepts.
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 5:34 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SharePoint Web Server farms

Just follow the bouncing balls? :-P

Regards,

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php

From: Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 4:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SharePoint Web Server farms

Hi there, yes I am being lazy, so apologies from the off. I am going to google, 
but if anyone can point me to some step by step guides for setting up W2K3 
SharePoint (free version) in a farm (is this possible?) I would be grateful :)

Clayton Doige
IT Project Manager
CME Development Corporation
T: 020 7430 5355
M: 07949 255062
E:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W:www.cetv-net.com

__
This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information 
intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may 
contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt 
from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution 
of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or 
sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any 
attachments without retaining any copies. 
_










~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Double trouble

[Sherry Abercrombie]

Congrats, and as John said it goes by fast so enjoy every moment and make
those memories that will last a lifetime!

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Roger Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Great news!  Enjoy this tremendous blessing for the rest of your life!
> (not that you'll be getting that much rest )
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Roger Wright
>
> Network Administrator
>
> Evatone, Inc.
>
> 727.572.7076  x388
>
> _
>
>
>
> *From:* James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:14 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* OT: Double trouble
>
>
>
> Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys
> on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and
> Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into
> my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Personal SSL Cert disappearing

[Groups]

It's a personal cert that's installed via the banks website.

I have even exported it, then imported it.

It shows as imported fine, but when I open IE, it does not show up under
personal certs.

The bank claims that it belongs under personal certs.

I have also tried to install it in other locations such as trusted
publishers, and while it saves there, it will not show up when the bank
looks for it.

 

This is a Widows XP Pro machine, SP2, IE7 on 2003 AD.

 

 
Dave

===
Beach Computers
Affordable Hosting Solutions
http://www.beachcomp.com
===
Cheap Domain Warehouse
Get Your Own Dot!
http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com
 


Disclaimer and confidentiality note:

The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s)
and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If
you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete
it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender
of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records
can be corrected.
Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated
as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies.
Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has
been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or
interference.

From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 7:35 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Personal SSL Cert disappearing

 

Is the cert a client authentication cert? Or a server authentication cert?
If the latter, then it shouldn't be installed in "Personal Certs" Instead,
the CA's cert (that issued the server auth cert) should be installed in
Trusted Root CAs.

 

If it's a client authN cert, use MMC (add the Certificates snapin) - does
the cert disappear by itself?

 

Cheers

Ken

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2008 10:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Personal SSL Cert disappearing

 

Hi all,

 

Got a very odd issue.

 

We have a domain user who is trying to log onto a bank website.

The bank requires an SSL cert to be installed.

The cert installs and shows as installed under personals certs, but, once IE
is closed and reopened, it's gone.

 

Anyone have any ideas?

 

Thanks!

 

 
Dave

===
Beach Computers
Affordable Hosting Solutions
http://www.beachcomp.com
===
Cheap Domain Warehouse
Get Your Own Dot!
http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com
 


Disclaimer and confidentiality note:

The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s)
and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If
you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete
it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender
of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records
can be corrected.
Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated
as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies.
Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has
been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or
interference. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[Doige, Clayton]

Congrats

 

Clayton Doige

IT Project Manager

CME Development Corporation

T: 020 7430 5355

M: 07949 255062

E:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

W:www.cetv-net.com

From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 December 2008 14:16
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Double trouble

 

Great news, congrats man!

 

Enjoy that last bit of sleep while Moms in the hospital!

 

James

- Original Message - 

From: James Rankin   

To: NT System Admin Issues
  

Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:31 AM

Subject: Re: Double trouble

 

hehe, will post some pics, once I get some sleep :-)

2008/12/9 Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

No one cares about you and quit trying to steal his thunder.  J 

 

Congrats, James.  Y'all must be very special people to be
blessed with twins. Please post some pics when you get a free
moment...in about three months.  

 

Shook

 

From: Kelsay, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:25 AM 


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Double trouble 

 

Just realized.  Same birthday as me, December 8th.

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 December 2008 13:14
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

 

Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two
twin boys on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we
received James and Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am
now off to collapse into my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)

 

 



__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security
System.
For more information please visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/email 

__

** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com
Limited ** 

Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
Registration no. 310635.

Inspop.com Limited (also trading as "Confused.com") is
registered in England and Wales at 2nd Floor, Friary House, Greyfriars
Road, Cardiff, CF10 3AE (Reg. No. 03857130 ). Any opinions expressed in
this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the company.
This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and
forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently
transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of
the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by
attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the
person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised
that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly
prohibited. 

If you have received this email in error please notify the
Information Security Officer by telephone on +44 (0) 29 2043 4252.
Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. This email
has been swept for viruses before leaving our system.

Security Warning: Please note that this email has been created
in the knowledge that Internet email is not a 100% secure communications
medium. We advise that you understand and accept this lack of security
when emailing us.

Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email
and any attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping
with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are
actually virus free.

We may monitor the content of E-mails sent and received via our
network for viruses or unauthorised use and for other lawful business
purposes.

 




This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Messagelabs. The
service is powered by MessageLabs.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
__


__
This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information 
intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may 
contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt 
from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, discl

OT: For those of you in Illinois

[Christopher J. Bosak]

Gov. Rod Blagojevich has been taken into federal custody 

 

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/politics

&id=6545958

 

Chris

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: For those of you in Illinois

[Jason Morris]

Oh snap. I knew they were digging into him pretty hard lately, I didn't
know it was that far along...I guess we'll see all of those IPass signs
go away soon too. ;)

Jason

 

From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: For those of you in Illinois

 

Gov. Rod Blagojevich has been taken into federal custody 

 

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/politics&id=6545958

 

Chris

 

 

 

 

 

--
The pages accompanying this email transmission contain information from MJMC, 
Inc., which
is confidential and/or privileged. The information is to be for the use of the 
individual
or entity named on this cover sheet. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are
hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in 
error, please
immediately notify us by telephone so that we can arrange for the retrieval of 
the original
document.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: OT: Double trouble

[Joe Fox]

Congratulations to you and your wife!  Enjoy your most precious gift this
holiday season!

Joe Fox
Systems/Network Administrator

Mobile# (716) 846-9308
http://www.linkedin.com/in/josephfoxjr


On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:14 AM, James Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys
> on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and
> Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into
> my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: For those of you in Illinois

[Christopher J. Bosak]

One can only hope. 

 

Chris

 

From: Jason Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 08:51 hrs.
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: For those of you in Illinois

 

Oh snap. I knew they were digging into him pretty hard lately, I didn't know
it was that far along.I guess we'll see all of those IPass signs go away
soon too. ;)

Jason

 

From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: For those of you in Illinois

 

Gov. Rod Blagojevich has been taken into federal custody 

 

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/politics

&id=6545958

 

Chris

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

--
The pages accompanying this email transmission contain information from
MJMC, Inc., which
is confidential and/or privileged. The information is to be for the use of
the individual
or entity named on this cover sheet. If you are not the intended recipient,
you are
hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in
error, please
immediately notify us by telephone so that we can arrange for the retrieval
of the original
document.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: OT: For those of you in Illinois

[RichardMcClary]

Unfortunately, it's raining very hard.  The rain will eventually turn to 
snow, and it will get to be very cold.  That keeps the street celebrations 
down...
--
Richard McClary, Systems Administrator
ASPCA Knowledge Management
1717 S Philo Rd, Ste 36, Urbana, IL  61802
217-337-9761
http://www.aspca.org


"Christopher J. Bosak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/09/2008 08:47:13 
AM:

> Gov. Rod Blagojevich has been taken into federal custody 
> 
> http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/politics&id=6545958
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Declining an already approved WSUS update

[Michael . Leone]

I made a bonehead mistake, and approved the installation of .NET Framework 
3.0 (I wanted to just approve the updates to it, so that any system that 
had it was updated,  but didn't want to just generally install it). 
Luckily, none of my WSUS clients auto-install., so it didn't get pushed 
out to the clients. But I did see that WSUS thought a substantial number 
of clients needed it, and now I see that update on the clients, as an 
update waiting to be downloaded.. 

Now I've gone back into the list of approved updates, and declined that 
specific item. I'm hoping that any of the systems that had been listed as 
"needing installation" from when it was approved, will now just remove 
that item from the list of needed updates, the next time the clients check 
into the WSUS server? For example, I still see it in the list of updates 
waiting to be downloaded on the WSUS server itself, even after declining 
the update and rebooting.

What else do I need to do, to ensure that the v3 Framework is not 
installed on the clients?

Thanks

-- 
Michael Leone
Network Administrator, ISM
Philadelphia Housing Authority
2500 Jackson St
Philadelphia, PA 19145
Tel:  215-684-4180
Cell: 215-252-0143


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: OT: For those of you in Illinois

[Jon Harris]

I wonder if he has already purchased his get out of free pass yet.  Seems
from the new article he was being a bit flip about the whole thing.  One
would think if he was that flip he had already gotten something worked out
before hand with someone.  I guess you folks up there will see shortly.

Jon

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:06 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Unfortunately, it's raining very hard.  The rain will eventually turn to
> snow, and it will get to be very cold.  That keeps the street celebrations
> down...
> --
> Richard McClary, Systems Administrator
> ASPCA Knowledge Management
> 1717 S Philo Rd, Ste 36, Urbana, IL  61802
> 217-337-9761
> http://www.aspca.org
>
>
> "Christopher J. Bosak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/09/2008 08:47:13
> AM:
>
> > Gov. Rod Blagojevich has been taken into federal custody
> >
> > http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/politics&id=6545958
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[David Lum]

Here's a tip: Get video! Take just 60 seconds of random video every month or 
two. Doesn't matter what they're doing - eating, playing, sleeping just 
shoot 60 seconds. Five years (and more) down the road you'll look at the videos 
and go "wow".

I'd wager all parents on this list would love to have short little clips from 
every year (ok after puberty it might not need to be even every year anymore...)

Dave

From: Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Double trouble

Congrats

Clayton Doige
IT Project Manager
CME Development Corporation
T: 020 7430 5355
M: 07949 255062
E:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W:www.cetv-net.com
From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 December 2008 14:16
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Double trouble

Great news, congrats man!

Enjoy that last bit of sleep while Moms in the hospital!

James
- Original Message -
From: James Rankin
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: Double trouble

hehe, will post some pics, once I get some sleep :-)
2008/12/9 Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

No one cares about you and quit trying to steal his thunder.  :)



Congrats, James.  Y'all must be very special people to be blessed with twins. 
Please post some pics when you get a free moment...in about three months.



Shook



From: Kelsay, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:25 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Double trouble



Just realized.  Same birthday as me, December 8th.



From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 December 2008 13:14
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble



Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys on 
Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and Jacob 
who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into my bed 
for some much-needed rest. :-)





__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com Limited **

Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registration no. 
310635.

Inspop.com Limited (also trading as "Confused.com") is registered in England 
and Wales at 2nd Floor, Friary House, Greyfriars Road, Cardiff, CF10 3AE (Reg. 
No. 03857130 ). Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the 
individual and not necessarily the company. This email and any files 
transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain 
alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and 
solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected 
by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the 
person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that 
you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this email in error please notify the Information Security 
Officer by telephone on +44 (0) 29 2043 4252. Please then delete this email and 
destroy any copies of it. This email has been swept for viruses before leaving 
our system.

Security Warning: Please note that this email has been created in the knowledge 
that Internet email is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that 
you understand and accept this lack of security when emailing us.

Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and any 
attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good 
computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.

We may monitor the content of E-mails sent and received via our network for 
viruses or unauthorised use and for other lawful business purposes.




This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Messagelabs. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. 





















__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
__

__
This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information 
intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may 
contain informat

RE: OT: For those of you in Illinois

[Christopher J. Bosak]

That's true. Well, we could always start fires in the streets.

Chris

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 09:06 hrs.
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: For those of you in Illinois

Unfortunately, it's raining very hard.  The rain will eventually turn to 
snow, and it will get to be very cold.  That keeps the street celebrations 
down...
--
Richard McClary, Systems Administrator
ASPCA Knowledge Management
1717 S Philo Rd, Ste 36, Urbana, IL  61802
217-337-9761
http://www.aspca.org


"Christopher J. Bosak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/09/2008 08:47:13 
AM:

> Gov. Rod Blagojevich has been taken into federal custody 
> 
> http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/politics&id=6545958
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Declining an already approved WSUS update

[Martin Blackstone]

I think it will go away next time the clients report in.

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Declining an already approved WSUS update

 


I made a bonehead mistake, and approved the installation of .NET Framework
3.0 (I wanted to just approve the updates to it, so that any system that had
it was updated,  but didn't want to just generally install it). Luckily,
none of my WSUS clients auto-install., so it didn't get pushed out to the
clients. But I did see that WSUS thought a substantial number of clients
needed it, and now I see that update on the clients, as an update waiting to
be downloaded.. 

Now I've gone back into the list of approved updates, and declined that
specific item. I'm hoping that any of the systems that had been listed as
"needing installation" from when it was approved, will now just remove that
item from the list of needed updates, the next time the clients check into
the WSUS server? For example, I still see it in the list of updates waiting
to be downloaded on the WSUS server itself, even after declining the update
and rebooting. 

What else do I need to do, to ensure that the v3 Framework is not installed
on the clients? 

Thanks 

-- 
Michael Leone
Network Administrator, ISM
Philadelphia Housing Authority
2500 Jackson St
Philadelphia, PA 19145
Tel:  215-684-4180
Cell: 215-252-0143


 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Personal SSL Cert disappearing

[Troy Meyer]

Does it ever work to access the bank?  Has this machine or user ever been 
renamed?

We have had issues on permissions to the physical folder that holds the 
personal certificate store on select XP machines, most of the time caused by 
computer/user name change flubbubs.

This happened very seldom with some of our dealers, but was always fixed by 
booting into safe mode and removing/re-adding user permissions to the folder at 
(and propagating all changes to child objects)

 C:\Documents and Settings\%username%\Application Data\Microsoft\Crypto

Before I did that though, I would try that user logged into a different machine 
to see if that gives you any love.


-Troy


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Personal SSL Cert disappearing

It's a personal cert that's installed via the banks website.

I have even exported it, then imported it.

It shows as imported fine, but when I open IE, it does not show up under 
personal certs.

The bank claims that it belongs under personal certs.

I have also tried to install it in other locations such as trusted publishers, 
and while it saves there, it will not show up when the bank looks for it.

 

This is a Widows XP Pro machine, SP2, IE7 on 2003 AD.

 

 
Dave

===
Beach Computers
Affordable Hosting Solutions
http://www.beachcomp.com
===
Cheap Domain Warehouse
Get Your Own Dot!
http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com
 


Disclaimer and confidentiality note:

The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s) and 
may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If you 
have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete
it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of 
the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records
can be corrected.
Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated as 
being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies.
Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has been 
maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.

From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 7:35 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Personal SSL Cert disappearing

 

Is the cert a client authentication cert? Or a server authentication cert? If 
the latter, then it shouldn't be installed in "Personal Certs" Instead, the 
CA's cert (that issued the server auth cert) should be installed in Trusted 
Root CAs.

 

If it's a client authN cert, use MMC (add the Certificates snapin) - does the 
cert disappear by itself?

 

Cheers

Ken

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2008 10:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Personal SSL Cert disappearing

 

Hi all,

 

Got a very odd issue.

 

We have a domain user who is trying to log onto a bank website.

The bank requires an SSL cert to be installed.

The cert installs and shows as installed under personals certs, but, once IE is 
closed and reopened, it's gone.

 

Anyone have any ideas?

 

Thanks!

 

 
Dave

===
Beach Computers
Affordable Hosting Solutions
http://www.beachcomp.com
===
Cheap Domain Warehouse
Get Your Own Dot!
http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com
 


Disclaimer and confidentiality note:

The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s) and 
may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If you 
have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete
it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of 
the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records
can be corrected.
Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated as 
being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies.
Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has been 
maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 


~ Fin

RE: Personal SSL Cert disappearing

[Ken Schaefer]

Hi,

I'm not asking whether it's a personal cert or not. I'm asking whether this 
cert is being used for client authentication or server authentication, as the 
certificate store (machine -vs- user as well as the location) are different.

If it's a client authentication certificate, then the remote webserver presents 
a list of trusted CAs during the SSL handshake. IE will only show certs that 
are properly chained, and issued by CAs in that list in the "select a 
certificate" dialogue presented to the user. I would check that the issuing CA 
is in one of the trusted CA stores for the user, and that the client 
authentication certificate is in the personal store (which you seem to have 
done). Then you will need to make sure that the CA is listed in the list 
returned by the remote webserver.

Cheers
Ken

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 December 2008 1:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Personal SSL Cert disappearing

It's a personal cert that's installed via the banks website.
I have even exported it, then imported it.
It shows as imported fine, but when I open IE, it does not show up under 
personal certs.
The bank claims that it belongs under personal certs.
I have also tried to install it in other locations such as trusted publishers, 
and while it saves there, it will not show up when the bank looks for it.

This is a Widows XP Pro machine, SP2, IE7 on 2003 AD.


Dave

===
Beach Computers
Affordable Hosting Solutions
http://www.beachcomp.com
===
Cheap Domain Warehouse
Get Your Own Dot!
http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com



Disclaimer and confidentiality note:

The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s) and 
may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If you 
have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete
it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of 
the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records
can be corrected.
Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated as 
being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies.
Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has been 
maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 7:35 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Personal SSL Cert disappearing

Is the cert a client authentication cert? Or a server authentication cert? If 
the latter, then it shouldn't be installed in "Personal Certs" Instead, the 
CA's cert (that issued the server auth cert) should be installed in Trusted 
Root CAs.

If it's a client authN cert, use MMC (add the Certificates snapin) - does the 
cert disappear by itself?

Cheers
Ken

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2008 10:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Personal SSL Cert disappearing

Hi all,

Got a very odd issue.

We have a domain user who is trying to log onto a bank website.
The bank requires an SSL cert to be installed.
The cert installs and shows as installed under personals certs, but, once IE is 
closed and reopened, it's gone.

Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks!


Dave

===
Beach Computers
Affordable Hosting Solutions
http://www.beachcomp.com
===
Cheap Domain Warehouse
Get Your Own Dot!
http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com



Disclaimer and confidentiality note:

The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s) and 
may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If you 
have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete
it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of 
the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records
can be corrected.
Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated as 
being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies.
Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has been 
maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.

RE: Double trouble

[David Mazzaccaro]

This is exactly what I do!
Matter of fact, we took my daughter's "7 month" picture today.  
I print a sign that says "I'm 7 months old today" and we put that next to her 
w/ the same teddy bear.
 
 



From: René de Haas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 11:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Double trouble



Very good idea. Also take a picture of them in the same background evertime and 
you will see them grow.

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 5:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Double trouble

 

Here's a tip: Get video! Take just 60 seconds of random video every month or 
two. Doesn't matter what they're doing - eating, playing, sleeping just 
shoot 60 seconds. Five years (and more) down the road you'll look at the videos 
and go "wow". 

 

I'd wager all parents on this list would love to have short little clips from 
every year (ok after puberty it might not need to be even every year anymore...)

 

Dave

 

From: Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Double trouble

 

Congrats

 

Clayton Doige

IT Project Manager

CME Development Corporation

T: 020 7430 5355

M: 07949 255062

E:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

W:www.cetv-net.com

From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 December 2008 14:16
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Double trouble

 

Great news, congrats man!

 

Enjoy that last bit of sleep while Moms in the hospital!

 

James

- Original Message - 

From: James Rankin   

To: NT System Admin Issues 
  

Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:31 AM

Subject: Re: Double trouble

 

hehe, will post some pics, once I get some sleep :-)

2008/12/9 Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

No one cares about you and quit trying to steal his thunder.  J 

 

Congrats, James.  Y'all must be very special people to be blessed with 
twins. Please post some pics when you get a free moment...in about three 
months.  

 

Shook

 

From: Kelsay, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:25 AM 


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Double trouble 

 

Just realized.  Same birthday as me, December 8th.

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 December 2008 13:14
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

 

Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin 
boys on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and 
Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into my 
bed for some much-needed rest. :-)

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__

** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com Limited 
** 

Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. 
Registration no. 310635.

Inspop.com Limited (also trading as "Confused.com") is registered in 
England and Wales at 2nd Floor, Friary House, Greyfriars Road, Cardiff, CF10 
3AE (Reg. No. 03857130 ). Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the 
individual and not necessarily the company. This email and any files 
transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain 
alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and 
solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected 
by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the 
person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that 
you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. 

If you have received this email in error please notify the Information 
Security Officer by telephone on +44 (0) 29 2043 4252. Please then delete this 
email and destroy any copies of it. This email has been swept for viruses 
before leaving our system.

Security Warning: Please note that this email has been created in the 
knowledge that Internet email is not a 100% secure communications medium. We 
advise that you understand and accept this lack of security when emailing us.

Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and any 
attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good 
computing practice the recipient should ensur

RE: Declining an already approved WSUS update

[Alex Carroll]

You could always do a "wuauclt.exe /resetauthorization /detectnow" on
the client - that will force it to report to the WSUS server and then it
will go away now instead of having to wait for them to report... just to
make sure that waiting will work.  

 

Alex Carroll

Software Support

Crabtree Companies, Inc.

651-688-2727

 



From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 10:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Declining an already approved WSUS update

 

I think it will go away next time the clients report in.

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Declining an already approved WSUS update

 


I made a bonehead mistake, and approved the installation of .NET
Framework 3.0 (I wanted to just approve the updates to it, so that any
system that had it was updated,  but didn't want to just generally
install it). Luckily, none of my WSUS clients auto-install., so it
didn't get pushed out to the clients. But I did see that WSUS thought a
substantial number of clients needed it, and now I see that update on
the clients, as an update waiting to be downloaded.. 

Now I've gone back into the list of approved updates, and declined that
specific item. I'm hoping that any of the systems that had been listed
as "needing installation" from when it was approved, will now just
remove that item from the list of needed updates, the next time the
clients check into the WSUS server? For example, I still see it in the
list of updates waiting to be downloaded on the WSUS server itself, even
after declining the update and rebooting. 

What else do I need to do, to ensure that the v3 Framework is not
installed on the clients? 

Thanks 

-- 
Michael Leone
Network Administrator, ISM
Philadelphia Housing Authority
2500 Jackson St
Philadelphia, PA 19145
Tel:  215-684-4180
Cell: 215-252-0143


 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: SharePoint Web Server farms

[Clayton Doige]

that's fair comment for sure, and thanks for that. We have 40 users, with a
bunch of team sites in one collection. I thought of using a farm as opposed
to setting up some sort of formal DR Process (currently have a batch file
using stsadm to take back ups, and could use the same for a restore to a
target dr server, and do the necessary from there).

thanks again

2008/12/9 David Lum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>  +1, it's easy to **set it up**. The trick is to understand how you want
> to deploy it to the organization. Do you want multiple web apps, or just
> one? Multiple site collections, or just one collection with a bunch of team
> sites underneath? When it comes to restoring data you need to keep in mind
> how you design your SharePoint infrastructure has an effect on this as well
> as how granular you can delegate permissions. If you have a small company
> then it's not a problem, one site will likely cover your needs, but if you
> have 500+ users, you might need more than one. *Maybe*.
>
>
>
> Think of SharePoint as you would Active Directory – you can get it going
> without any planning, but it will work better for you if you have it mapped
> out ahead of time.
>
>
>
> I **highly** recommend a class on SharePoint before just throwing it out
> there. For me, SharePoint took more than just reading on the web to get my
> hands around some of the concepts.
>
> *David Lum** **// *SYSTEMS ENGINEER
> NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
> (Desk) 971.222.1025 *// *(Cell) 503.267.9764
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008 5:34 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: SharePoint Web Server farms
>
>
>
> Just follow the bouncing balls? :-P
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
>
> My blog: 
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
>
> I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php
>
>
>
> *From:* Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008 4:41 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* SharePoint Web Server farms
>
>
>
> Hi there, yes I am being lazy, so apologies from the off. I am going to
> google, but if anyone can point me to some step by step guides for setting
> up W2K3 SharePoint (free version) in a farm (is this possible?) I would be
> grateful J
>
>
>
> *Clayton Doige*
>
> IT Project Manager
>
> *C**M**E** Development Corporation*
>
> T: 020 7430 5355
>
> M: 07949 255062
>
> E:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> W:www.cetv-net.com
>
>
> __
> This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information
> intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and
> may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or
> exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or
> distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal
> restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please
> notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original
> message and any attachments without retaining any copies.
> _
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Clayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://alsipius.com

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Declining an already approved WSUS update

[Michael . Leone]

"Alex Carroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/09/2008 11:34:36 AM:

> You could always do a ?wuauclt.exe /resetauthorization /detectnow? 
> on the client ? that will force it to report to the WSUS server and 
> then it will go away now instead of having to wait for them to 
> report? just to make sure that waiting will work. 

That is what I did, on the WSUS server. And the V3 Framework did not then 
appear on the list of waiting updates. 

Since I don't have an easy way to run the "detectnow" on all the other 
clients automatically, I will just wait for them to check in and update 
themselves normally.

Thanks

> 
> Alex Carroll
> Software Support
> Crabtree Companies, Inc.
> 651-688-2727
> 
> 
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 10:20 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Declining an already approved WSUS update
> 
> I think it will go away next time the clients report in.
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:21 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Declining an already approved WSUS update
> 
> 
> I made a bonehead mistake, and approved the installation of .NET 
> Framework 3.0 (I wanted to just approve the updates to it, so that 
> any system that had it was updated,  but didn't want to just 
> generally install it). Luckily, none of my WSUS clients auto-
> install., so it didn't get pushed out to the clients. But I did see 
> that WSUS thought a substantial number of clients needed it, and now
> I see that update on the clients, as an update waiting to be 
downloaded.. 
> 
> Now I've gone back into the list of approved updates, and declined 
> that specific item. I'm hoping that any of the systems that had been
> listed as "needing installation" from when it was approved, will now
> just remove that item from the list of needed updates, the next time
> the clients check into the WSUS server? For example, I still see it 
> in the list of updates waiting to be downloaded on the WSUS server 
> itself, even after declining the update and rebooting. 
> 
> What else do I need to do, to ensure that the v3 Framework is not 
> installed on the clients? 
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> -- 
> Michael Leone
> Network Administrator, ISM
> Philadelphia Housing Authority
> 2500 Jackson St
> Philadelphia, PA 19145
> Tel:  215-684-4180
> Cell: 215-252-0143
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[Michael Ross]

I just sense you waking up and having a Bill and Ted moment.. well more like
Ted.. "I'm a Dad...".. "shut UP Ted!"

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 10:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Double trouble

 

Here's a tip: Get video! Take just 60 seconds of random video every month or
two. Doesn't matter what they're doing - eating, playing, sleeping.. just
shoot 60 seconds. Five years (and more) down the road you'll look at the
videos and go "wow". 

 

I'd wager all parents on this list would love to have short little clips
from every year (ok after puberty it might not need to be even every year
anymore.)

 

Dave

 

From: Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Double trouble

 

Congrats

 

Clayton Doige

IT Project Manager

CME Development Corporation

T: 020 7430 5355

M: 07949 255062

E:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

W:www.cetv-net.com

From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 December 2008 14:16
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Double trouble

 

Great news, congrats man!

 

Enjoy that last bit of sleep while Moms in the hospital!

 

James

- Original Message - 

From: James Rankin   

To: NT System Admin Issues   

Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:31 AM

Subject: Re: Double trouble

 

hehe, will post some pics, once I get some sleep :-)

2008/12/9 Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

No one cares about you and quit trying to steal his thunder.  J 

 

Congrats, James.  Y'all must be very special people to be blessed with
twins. Please post some pics when you get a free moment.in about three
months.  

 

Shook

 

From: Kelsay, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:25 AM 


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Double trouble 

 

Just realized.  Same birthday as me, December 8th.

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 December 2008 13:14
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

 

Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys
on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and
Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into
my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__

** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com Limited ** 

Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registration
no. 310635.

Inspop.com Limited (also trading as "Confused.com") is registered in England
and Wales at 2nd Floor, Friary House, Greyfriars Road, Cardiff, CF10 3AE
(Reg. No. 03857130 ). Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the
individual and not necessarily the company. This email and any files
transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may
contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are
confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may
contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended
recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that
any use is strictly prohibited. 

If you have received this email in error please notify the Information
Security Officer by telephone on +44 (0) 29 2043 4252. Please then delete
this email and destroy any copies of it. This email has been swept for
viruses before leaving our system.

Security Warning: Please note that this email has been created in the
knowledge that Internet email is not a 100% secure communications medium. We
advise that you understand and accept this lack of security when emailing
us.

Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and any
attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good
computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.

We may monitor the content of E-mails sent and received via our network for
viruses or unauthorised use and for other lawful business purposes.

 



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Messagelabs. The
service is powered by MessageLabs.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
__


__

RE: OT: For those of you in Illinois

[Michael Ross]

Dr. Peter Venkman: This city is headed for a disaster of biblical
proportions. 
Mayor: What do you mean, "biblical"? 
Dr Ray Stantz: What he means is Old Testament, Mr. Mayor, real wrath of God
type stuff. 
Dr. Peter Venkman: Exactly. 
Dr Ray Stantz: Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and
seas boiling! 
Dr. Egon Spengler: Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes... 
Winston Zeddemore: The dead rising from the grave! 
Dr. Peter Venkman: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass
hysteria!

... Tell him about the twinkee , Ray!


-Original Message-
From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 10:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT: For those of you in Illinois

That's true. Well, we could always start fires in the streets.

Chris

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 09:06 hrs.
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: For those of you in Illinois

Unfortunately, it's raining very hard.  The rain will eventually turn to 
snow, and it will get to be very cold.  That keeps the street celebrations 
down...
--
Richard McClary, Systems Administrator
ASPCA Knowledge Management
1717 S Philo Rd, Ste 36, Urbana, IL  61802
217-337-9761
http://www.aspca.org


"Christopher J. Bosak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/09/2008 08:47:13 
AM:

> Gov. Rod Blagojevich has been taken into federal custody 
> 
> http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/politics&id=6545958
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Double trouble

[Kim Longenbaugh]

Yah, when they hit puberty, it's best to seal them in a barrel and not
let them out until they're 18 or so.

 



From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 10:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Double trouble

 

Here's a tip: Get video! Take just 60 seconds of random video every
month or two. Doesn't matter what they're doing - eating, playing,
sleeping just shoot 60 seconds. Five years (and more) down the road
you'll look at the videos and go "wow". 

 

I'd wager all parents on this list would love to have short little clips
from every year (ok after puberty it might not need to be even every
year anymore...)

 

Dave

 

From: Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Double trouble

 

Congrats

 

Clayton Doige

IT Project Manager

CME Development Corporation

T: 020 7430 5355

M: 07949 255062

E:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

W:www.cetv-net.com

From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 December 2008 14:16
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Double trouble

 

Great news, congrats man!

 

Enjoy that last bit of sleep while Moms in the hospital!

 

James

- Original Message - 

From: James Rankin   

To: NT System Admin Issues
  

Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:31 AM

Subject: Re: Double trouble

 

hehe, will post some pics, once I get some sleep :-)

2008/12/9 Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

No one cares about you and quit trying to steal his thunder.
:-) 

 

Congrats, James.  Y'all must be very special people to be
blessed with twins. Please post some pics when you get a free
moment...in about three months.  

 

Shook

 

From: Kelsay, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:25 AM 


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Double trouble 

 

Just realized.  Same birthday as me, December 8th.

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 December 2008 13:14
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

 

Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two
twin boys on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we
received James and Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am
now off to collapse into my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)

 

 



__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security
System.
For more information please visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/email 

__

** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com
Limited ** 

Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
Registration no. 310635.

Inspop.com Limited (also trading as "Confused.com") is
registered in England and Wales at 2nd Floor, Friary House, Greyfriars
Road, Cardiff, CF10 3AE (Reg. No. 03857130 ). Any opinions expressed in
this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the company.
This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and
forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently
transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of
the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by
attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the
person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised
that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly
prohibited. 

If you have received this email in error please notify the
Information Security Officer by telephone on +44 (0) 29 2043 4252.
Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. This email
has been swept for viruses before leaving our system.

Security Warning: Please note that this email has been created
in the knowledge that Internet email is not a 100% secure communications
medium. We advise that you understand and accept this lack of security
when emailing us.

Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email
and any attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping
with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are
actually virus free.

We may monitor the content of E-mails sent and received via our
network for viruses or unauthorised use and for other lawful business
purposes.

 




This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Messagelabs. The
  

Windows 2003 NFS V1.0

[Doige, Clayton]

I am trying to connect a Citrix Xen 4.1 server to an HP NAS box running
MS NFS 1.0 and can't get Citrix to connect. I am pretty confident it is
an authentication issue, and am reading the help section regarding
setting up user name mappings, but am scratching my head a little. I
don't speak much Unix, well, actually, none.

 

The settings reference an NIS Domain, and this is where I think I am
coming unstuck, because I have no idea how to determine this on the Xen
Server. I have looked at the host parameters to see if this is in there
anywhere, and I have also tried just sticking the name and ip in there
and it won't connect.

 

So on the odd chance anyone knows anything about this and where I might
be going wrong any help would be greatly appreciated J

 

Regards

 

Clayton Doige

IT Project Manager

CME Development Corporation

T: 020 7430 5355

M: 07949 255062

E:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

W:www.cetv-net.com  


__
This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information 
intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may 
contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt 
from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution 
of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or 
sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any 
attachments without retaining any copies. 
_
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Cisco ASDM & Java 11

[Erik Goldoff]

if only it were so easy ...  the Pix is mounted flat against the wall, about
10 feet high with the demarch and pbx (small office), they can't even get to
the pix or switch to reset power without borrowing a ladder !  I'm gonna
have to just visit in person to set it right.
 

Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

  _  

From: Brian Caisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 9:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASDM & Java 11



You could use logmein.com products to temporary setup a session,  Have them
hook-up a serial cable to gain access to the device via console access and
enable the protocols.

 

From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 1:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cisco ASDM & Java 11

 

JAVA incompatibilities are really screwy ... I've got a client where my only
access to fix them remotely is via their 2003 terminal server, but the
version of JAVA doesn't play nice with  their PIX 501 , and last guy working
on them disabled telnet and outside interface access ... argggh

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 

  _  

From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 12:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cisco ASDM & Java 11

For ASA users:  Be aware the latest Java updates (11 - I believe) breaks the
ASDM interface.  I've had to go back to a previous Java version.  

 

There's supposedly a fix or interim release on the Cisco website.

 

 

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

Evatone, Inc.

727.572.7076  x388

  

ET E-mail Signature Logo

_

 

 

"Any change, even a change for the better, is always accompanied by
drawbacks and discomforts." - Arnold Bennett 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<>

Print to html?

[Bill Monicher]

I have some documents that I would like to convert to html.
They are currently in Excel, but if I export them as html, the headers
and footers disappear -- among other changes.
Also, rather then appear as a single scrollable document, there is an
imitation of the worksheet tabs at the bottom.
All very clever.

There are "print to pdf" utilities, is there a "print to html"
available anywhere?
Is there a way to convert a pdf to html?

Thanks,
--BM

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: SharePoint Web Server farms (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Kent, Larry CTR USA IMCOM]

Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE
 
Isn't that what Shook does?

  _  

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 2008-12-09 8:34
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SharePoint Web Server farms



Just follow the bouncing balls? :-P

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php

 

From: Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 4:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SharePoint Web Server farms

 

Hi there, yes I am being lazy, so apologies from the off. I am going to
google, but if anyone can point me to some step by step guides for
setting up W2K3 SharePoint (free version) in a farm (is this possible?)
I would be grateful J

 

Clayton Doige

IT Project Manager

CME Development Corporation

T: 020 7430 5355

M: 07949 255062

E:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

W:www.cetv-net.com


__
This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information
intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed
and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged,
confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its
contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments
without retaining any copies.
_

 

 


 


 

 
Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Print to html?

[Angus Scott-Fleming]

On 9 Dec 2008 at 10:18, Bill Monicher  wrote:











> I have some documents that I would like to convert to html.




> They are currently in Excel, but if I export them as html, the headers




> and footers disappear -- among other changes.




> Also, rather then appear as a single scrollable document, there is an




> imitation of the worksheet tabs at the bottom.




> All very clever.




> 




> There are "print to pdf" utilities, is there a "print to html"




> available anywhere?




> Is there a way to convert a pdf to html?











Second hit at http://www.google.com/search?q="print+to+html"











  Click to Convert - Create PDF and HTML Files from any Document.




Click to Convert provides the quickest, easiest and most affordable way to 
create PDFs or HTML web-pages from virtually any document or application. 
Click to Convert allows businesses or users to easily create high-quality 
screen/web optimized PDF or HTML by dragging and dropping groups of files, 
by printing any file to Click to Convert’s virtual printer or by using the 
toolbar buttons added to Microsoft Office.











    * Creates PDF or HTML




    * NEW Microsoft Office® 2007 and Windows® Vista® support.




    * MS Office toolbar integration and advanced options




  http://www.clicktoconvert.com/


















--




Angus Scott-Fleming




GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona




1-520-290-5038




~!









 

 

 

First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the read.

[Ziots, Edward]

http://www.csoonline.com/article/468476/How_to_Handle_Security_Patches_W
ith_Sanity

 

 

Finally publishing some of my thoughts and ideas in the security arena, 

 

Z

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the read.

[David Mazzaccaro]

Congrats.  Good read.
 



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.
Importance: High



http://www.csoonline.com/article/468476/How_to_Handle_Security_Patches_W
ith_Sanity

 

 

Finally publishing some of my thoughts and ideas in the security arena, 

 

Z

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +


 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Print to html?

[Bill Monicher]

Umm, yes, there is quite a list, isn't there.
I was rather hoping that someone might have actually *used* one or
more of them, so that I might have something to choose between them.
>From your reply I'm guessing that you had assumed I had not tried the
google route, and I'm further guesing that you know about as much of
these things as I.

Have you actually used this?
Is it worth the 100 or so bucks?

Thanks,
--BM



On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Angus Scott-Fleming
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2008 at 10:18, Bill Monicher  wrote:
>> I have some documents that I would like to convert to html.
>> They are currently in Excel, but if I export them as html, the headers
>> and footers disappear -- among other changes.
>> Also, rather then appear as a single scrollable document, there is an
>> imitation of the worksheet tabs at the bottom.
>> All very clever.
>>
>> There are "print to pdf" utilities, is there a "print to html"
>> available anywhere?
>> Is there a way to convert a pdf to html?
> Second hit at http://www.google.com/search?q="print+to+html";
>   Click to Convert - Create PDF and HTML Files from any Document.
> Click to Convert provides the quickest, easiest and most affordable way to
> create PDFs or HTML web-pages from virtually any document or application.
> Click to Convert allows businesses or users to easily create high-quality
> screen/web optimized PDF or HTML by dragging and dropping groups of files,
> by printing any file to Click to Convert's virtual printer or by using the
> toolbar buttons added to Microsoft Office.
> * Creates PDF or HTML
> * NEW Microsoft Office(R) 2007 and Windows(R) Vista(R) support.
> * MS Office toolbar integration and advanced options
>   http://www.clicktoconvert.com/
>
> --
> Angus Scott-Fleming
> GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
> 1-520-290-5038
> ~!
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Print to html?

[Sean Rector]

What I do in this situation (I'm assuming you only want the first sheet)
is to copy/paste the part of the sheet I want as HTML into Word, then
save as HTML.  Works great for our company extension list.

Sean Rector, MCSE

-Original Message-
From: Bill Monicher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Print to html?

Umm, yes, there is quite a list, isn't there.
I was rather hoping that someone might have actually *used* one or
more of them, so that I might have something to choose between them.
>From your reply I'm guessing that you had assumed I had not tried the
google route, and I'm further guesing that you know about as much of
these things as I.

Have you actually used this?
Is it worth the 100 or so bucks?

Thanks,
--BM



On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Angus Scott-Fleming
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2008 at 10:18, Bill Monicher  wrote:
>> I have some documents that I would like to convert to html.
>> They are currently in Excel, but if I export them as html, the
headers
>> and footers disappear -- among other changes.
>> Also, rather then appear as a single scrollable document, there is an
>> imitation of the worksheet tabs at the bottom.
>> All very clever.
>>
>> There are "print to pdf" utilities, is there a "print to html"
>> available anywhere?
>> Is there a way to convert a pdf to html?
> Second hit at http://www.google.com/search?q="print+to+html";
>   Click to Convert - Create PDF and HTML Files from any Document.
> Click to Convert provides the quickest, easiest and most affordable
way to
> create PDFs or HTML web-pages from virtually any document or
application.
> Click to Convert allows businesses or users to easily create
high-quality
> screen/web optimized PDF or HTML by dragging and dropping groups of
files,
> by printing any file to Click to Convert's virtual printer or by using
the
> toolbar buttons added to Microsoft Office.
> * Creates PDF or HTML
> * NEW Microsoft Office(R) 2007 and Windows(R) Vista(R) support.
> * MS Office toolbar integration and advanced options
>   http://www.clicktoconvert.com/
>
> --
> Angus Scott-Fleming
> GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
> 1-520-290-5038
> ~!
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~
> 2008-2009 Season:  Tosca | The Barber of Seville
> Recently Announced:  Virginia Opera's 35th Anniversary Season 2009-2010
Visit us online at www.vaopera.org or call 1.866.OPERA.VA

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). Unless otherwise specified, persons unnamed as 
recipients may not read, distribute, copy or alter this e-mail. Any views or 
opinions expressed in this e-mail belong to the author and may not necessarily 
represent those of Virginia Opera. Although precautions have been taken to 
ensure no viruses are present, Virginia Opera cannot accept responsibility for 
any loss or damage that may arise from the use of this e-mail or attachments.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Print to html?

[Angus Scott-Fleming]

On 9 Dec 2008 at 10:18, Bill Monicher  wrote:

> Is there a way to convert a pdf to html?

Lots of them: http://www.google.com/search?q="pdf+to+html";

Adobe even has one:
Online conversion tools for Adobe PDF documents
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/access_onlinetools.html


--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Print to html?

[Roger Wright]

I've used this tool successfully:

http://www.softinterface.com/Convert-Doc%5CConvert-Doc.htm

   

Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc.
727.572.7076  x388
_  

-Original Message-
From: Bill Monicher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Print to html?

Umm, yes, there is quite a list, isn't there.
I was rather hoping that someone might have actually *used* one or
more of them, so that I might have something to choose between them.
>From your reply I'm guessing that you had assumed I had not tried the
google route, and I'm further guesing that you know about as much of
these things as I.

Have you actually used this?
Is it worth the 100 or so bucks?

Thanks,
--BM



On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Angus Scott-Fleming
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2008 at 10:18, Bill Monicher  wrote:
>> I have some documents that I would like to convert to html.
>> They are currently in Excel, but if I export them as html, the
headers
>> and footers disappear -- among other changes.
>> Also, rather then appear as a single scrollable document, there is an
>> imitation of the worksheet tabs at the bottom.
>> All very clever.
>>
>> There are "print to pdf" utilities, is there a "print to html"
>> available anywhere?
>> Is there a way to convert a pdf to html?
> Second hit at http://www.google.com/search?q="print+to+html";
>   Click to Convert - Create PDF and HTML Files from any Document.
> Click to Convert provides the quickest, easiest and most affordable
way to
> create PDFs or HTML web-pages from virtually any document or
application.
> Click to Convert allows businesses or users to easily create
high-quality
> screen/web optimized PDF or HTML by dragging and dropping groups of
files,
> by printing any file to Click to Convert's virtual printer or by using
the
> toolbar buttons added to Microsoft Office.
> * Creates PDF or HTML
> * NEW Microsoft Office(R) 2007 and Windows(R) Vista(R) support.
> * MS Office toolbar integration and advanced options
>   http://www.clicktoconvert.com/
>
> --
> Angus Scott-Fleming
> GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
> 1-520-290-5038
> ~!
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: OT: Double trouble

[Kurt Buff]

Congrats to the mom, good luck to both of you.

Kurt

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:14 AM, James Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin boys
> on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received James and
> Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to collapse into
> my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Print to html?

[Don Guyer]

Bill,

Although I do not have first-hand experience with it, we have
over 4k end users who have it and I've never heard a complaint.

Don Guyer
Systems Engineer
Information Services
Prudential Fox Roach/ Trident
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Ph: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
www.prufoxroach.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Bill Monicher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Print to html?

Umm, yes, there is quite a list, isn't there.
I was rather hoping that someone might have actually *used* one or
more of them, so that I might have something to choose between them.
>From your reply I'm guessing that you had assumed I had not tried the
google route, and I'm further guesing that you know about as much of
these things as I.

Have you actually used this?
Is it worth the 100 or so bucks?

Thanks,
--BM



On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Angus Scott-Fleming
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2008 at 10:18, Bill Monicher  wrote:
>> I have some documents that I would like to convert to html.
>> They are currently in Excel, but if I export them as html, the
headers
>> and footers disappear -- among other changes.
>> Also, rather then appear as a single scrollable document, there is an
>> imitation of the worksheet tabs at the bottom.
>> All very clever.
>>
>> There are "print to pdf" utilities, is there a "print to html"
>> available anywhere?
>> Is there a way to convert a pdf to html?
> Second hit at http://www.google.com/search?q="print+to+html";
>   Click to Convert - Create PDF and HTML Files from any Document.
> Click to Convert provides the quickest, easiest and most affordable
way to
> create PDFs or HTML web-pages from virtually any document or
application.
> Click to Convert allows businesses or users to easily create
high-quality
> screen/web optimized PDF or HTML by dragging and dropping groups of
files,
> by printing any file to Click to Convert's virtual printer or by using
the
> toolbar buttons added to Microsoft Office.
> * Creates PDF or HTML
> * NEW Microsoft Office(R) 2007 and Windows(R) Vista(R) support.
> * MS Office toolbar integration and advanced options
>   http://www.clicktoconvert.com/
>
> --
> Angus Scott-Fleming
> GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
> 1-520-290-5038
> ~!
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the read.

[David McSpadden]

Thanks a lot you make my job sound so easy!

 

:-(

 



From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.

 

Congrats.  Good read.

 

 



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.
Importance: High

http://www.csoonline.com/article/468476/How_to_Handle_Security_Patches_W
ith_Sanity

 

 

Finally publishing some of my thoughts and ideas in the security arena, 

 

Z

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site?

[Ziots, Edward]

Getting service unavailable from my site on www.microsoft.com/technet
anyone else getting the same, trying to see latest articles? 

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +



From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.

 

Thanks a lot you make my job sound so easy!

 

:-(

 



From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.

 

Congrats.  Good read.

 

 



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.
Importance: High

http://www.csoonline.com/article/468476/How_to_Handle_Security_Patches_W
ith_Sanity

 

 

Finally publishing some of my thoughts and ideas in the security arena, 

 

Z

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site?

[Thomas Gonzalez]

Yeppers...just got that same message:

 

 

 

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site?

 

Getting service unavailable from my site on www.microsoft.com/technet
anyone else getting the same, trying to see latest articles? 

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +



From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.

 

Thanks a lot you make my job sound so easy!

 

L

 



From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.

 

Congrats.  Good read.

 

 



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.
Importance: High

http://www.csoonline.com/article/468476/How_to_Handle_Security_Patches_W
ith_Sanity

 

 

Finally publishing some of my thoughts and ideas in the security arena, 

 

Z

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<>

RE: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site?

[Terry Dickson]

Seems to be working from Kansas.

-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site?

Getting service unavailable from my site on www.microsoft.com/technet anyone 
else getting the same, trying to see latest articles? 

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +



From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the read.

 

Thanks a lot you make my job sound so easy!

 

:-(

 



From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the read.

 

Congrats.  Good read.

 

 



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the read.
Importance: High

http://www.csoonline.com/article/468476/How_to_Handle_Security_Patches_With_Sanity

 

 

Finally publishing some of my thoughts and ideas in the security arena, 

 

Z

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site?

[Steve Ens]

Try http://technet.microsoft.com/en-ca/default.aspx
Seems to work..

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Ziots, Edward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Getting service unavailable from my site on www.microsoft.com/technetanyone 
> else getting the same, trying to see latest articles?
>
>
>
> Z
>
>
>
> Edward E. Ziots
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Lifespan Organization
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Phone: 401-639-3505
>
> MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
>   --
>
> *From:* David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:10 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
> read.
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot you make my job sound so easy!
>
>
>
> L
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:54 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
> read.
>
>
>
> Congrats.  Good read.
>
>
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:40 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
> read.
> *Importance:* High
>
>
> http://www.csoonline.com/article/468476/How_to_Handle_Security_Patches_With_Sanity
>
>
>
>
>
> Finally publishing some of my thoughts and ideas in the security arena,
>
>
>
> Z
>
> Edward E. Ziots
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Lifespan Organization
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Phone: 401-639-3505
>
> MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site?

[Kevin Lundy]

Nope, got in just fine

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Ziots, Edward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Getting service unavailable from my site on www.microsoft.com/technetanyone 
> else getting the same, trying to see latest articles?
>
>
>
> Z
>
>
>
> Edward E. Ziots
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Lifespan Organization
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Phone: 401-639-3505
>
> MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site?

[Don Ely]

technet - ctrl enter seems to work just fine

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Ziots, Edward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Getting service unavailable from my site on www.microsoft.com/technetanyone 
> else getting the same, trying to see latest articles?
>
>
>
> Z
>
>
>
> Edward E. Ziots
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Lifespan Organization
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Phone: 401-639-3505
>
> MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
>  --
>
> *From:* David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:10 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
> read.
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot you make my job sound so easy!
>
>
>
> L
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:54 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
> read.
>
>
>
> Congrats.  Good read.
>
>
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:40 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
> read.
> *Importance:* High
>
>
> http://www.csoonline.com/article/468476/How_to_Handle_Security_Patches_With_Sanity
>
>
>
>
>
> Finally publishing some of my thoughts and ideas in the security arena,
>
>
>
> Z
>
> Edward E. Ziots
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Lifespan Organization
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Phone: 401-639-3505
>
> MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site?

[Phil Brutsche]

No problems here.

Ziots, Edward wrote:
> Getting service unavailable from my site on www.microsoft.com/technet
>  anyone else getting the same, trying
> to see latest articles?

-- 

Phil Brutsche
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: SharePoint Server

[Steven M. Caesare]

We are getting ready to pilot SP for much the same purpose.

 

The potential SQL server size scares me.

 

-sc

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SharePoint Server

 

I am gearing up to deploy SharePoint Server 2007.  The main goal is to
help eliminate "Outlook as a file transport", but eliminate the 100's of
file shares we have.  But I also know there is much more to the product.

 

I would appreciate replies from those that have deployed SharePoint or
have SharePoint experience on what your deployment experience was and
what you would or wouldn't do again.  

 

Also, anyone have SharePoint running in a VM?   

 

As I type this, I am loading up a test server to experience the install
process and do some testing. 

 

Thanks for any info.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site? (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Kent, Larry CTR USA IMCOM]

Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE
 
Same here...

  _  

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 2008-12-09 2:27
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site?



Getting service unavailable from my site on www.microsoft.com/technet
anyone else getting the same, trying to see latest articles? 

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

  _  

From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.

 

Thanks a lot you make my job sound so easy!

 

:-(

 

  _  

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.

 

Congrats.  Good read.

 

 

  _  

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.
Importance: High

http://www.csoonline.com/article/468476/How_to_Handle_Security_Patches_W
ith_Sanity

 

 

Finally publishing some of my thoughts and ideas in the security arena, 

 

Z

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


 

 
Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site? (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Jake Gardner]

 
 
 
I just had to get a screen shot.
 
;)
 
Thanks,
 
Jake Gardner
TTC Network Administrator
Ext. 246
 



From: Kent, Larry CTR USA IMCOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet
site? (UNCLASSIFIED)



Classification: UNCLASSIFIED 

Caveats: NONE

Same here...



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 2008-12-09 2:27
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site?



Getting service unavailable from my site on www.microsoft.com/technet
anyone else getting the same, trying to see latest articles? 

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +



From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.

 

Thanks a lot you make my job sound so easy!

 

:-(

 



From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.

 

Congrats.  Good read.

 

 



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.
Importance: High

http://www.csoonline.com/article/468476/How_to_Handle_Security_Patches_W
ith_Sanity

 

 

Finally publishing some of my thoughts and ideas in the security arena, 

 

Z

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED 

Caveats: NONE


 

 


***Teletronics Technology Corporation*** 
This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the 
addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you may not 
disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have received this 
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or by 
telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message and any copies.  Thank you.

***



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<>

RE: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site? (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Jake Gardner]

Forgot to add
 
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
 
Thanks,
 
Jake Gardner
TTC Network Administrator
Ext. 246
 



From: Kent, Larry CTR USA IMCOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet
site? (UNCLASSIFIED)



Classification: UNCLASSIFIED 

Caveats: NONE

Same here...



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 2008-12-09 2:27
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site?



Getting service unavailable from my site on www.microsoft.com/technet
anyone else getting the same, trying to see latest articles? 

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +



From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.

 

Thanks a lot you make my job sound so easy!

 

:-(

 



From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.

 

Congrats.  Good read.

 

 



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.
Importance: High

http://www.csoonline.com/article/468476/How_to_Handle_Security_Patches_W
ith_Sanity

 

 

Finally publishing some of my thoughts and ideas in the security arena, 

 

Z

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED 

Caveats: NONE


 

 


***Teletronics Technology Corporation*** 
This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the 
addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you may not 
disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have received this 
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or by 
telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message and any copies.  Thank you.

***



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site? (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Ziots, Edward]

Thanks all, I switched to the Firefox browser and it worked fine, prolly
IE fubbed up..

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +



From: Kent, Larry CTR USA IMCOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet
site? (UNCLASSIFIED)

 

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED 

Caveats: NONE

Same here...

 



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 2008-12-09 2:27
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site?

Getting service unavailable from my site on www.microsoft.com/technet
anyone else getting the same, trying to see latest articles? 

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +



From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.

 

Thanks a lot you make my job sound so easy!

 

:-(

 



From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.

 

Congrats.  Good read.

 

 



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.
Importance: High

http://www.csoonline.com/article/468476/How_to_Handle_Security_Patches_W
ith_Sanity

 

 

Finally publishing some of my thoughts and ideas in the security arena, 

 

Z

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED 

Caveats: NONE

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site? (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Jake Gardner]

Tried in chrome got the same error
 
Thanks,
 
Jake Gardner
TTC Network Administrator
Ext. 246
 



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet
site? (UNCLASSIFIED)



Thanks all, I switched to the Firefox browser and it worked fine, prolly
IE fubbed up..

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +



From: Kent, Larry CTR USA IMCOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet
site? (UNCLASSIFIED)

 

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED 

Caveats: NONE

Same here...

 



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 2008-12-09 2:27
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Anyone getting a Service unavailable message from Technet site?

Getting service unavailable from my site on www.microsoft.com/technet
anyone else getting the same, trying to see latest articles? 

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +



From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.

 

Thanks a lot you make my job sound so easy!

 

:-(

 



From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.

 

Congrats.  Good read.

 

 



From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 1:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: First Security Article Publication, hope you all enjoy the
read.
Importance: High

http://www.csoonline.com/article/468476/How_to_Handle_Security_Patches_W
ith_Sanity

 

 

Finally publishing some of my thoughts and ideas in the security arena, 

 

Z

Edward E. Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 401-639-3505

MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED 

Caveats: NONE

 

 

 


 

 


***Teletronics Technology Corporation*** 
This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the 
addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you may not 
disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have received this 
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or by 
telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message and any copies.  Thank you.

***



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: SAN question

[Matthew Bullock]

If you want to stick with Dell, check out the MD3000i iSCSI unit.  

 

mb

 

From: Tom Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SAN question

 

Hello:

 

I'm looking at Dell Equallogic arrays PS5000 series.  The look pretty
good for what we need here, but price is steep for my agency (starting
at around $45k just for the disks and enclosure).  Anyone have any
alternative vendors to suggest?  SAN will be used for databases,
logging, maybe some file and print data.

 

Thanks,

 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message. 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Double trouble

[Peter van Houten]

Belated good wishes to you and your partner James. My sister is the
proud mother of 9 year old identical twin boys and it has been an
amazing experience watching them mature; identical looking to the point
of confusion for this uncle but with personalities as different as chalk
and cheese. I like your choice of traditional names...

From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:14 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin
boys on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received
James and Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to
collapse into my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Double trouble

[James Kerr]

Good to see so many Dads are on this list.

- Original Message - 
From: "Peter van Houten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "NT System Admin Issues" 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 3:19 PM
Subject: Re: Double trouble



Belated good wishes to you and your partner James. My sister is the
proud mother of 9 year old identical twin boys and it has been an
amazing experience watching them mature; identical looking to the point
of confusion for this uncle but with personalities as different as chalk
and cheese. I like your choice of traditional names...

From: James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:14 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Double trouble

Just wanted to quickly share my happiness at the birth of my two twin
boys on Monday morning at 4:30am, after a traumatic night we received
James and Jacob who weighed in at a neat 4lb 10oz each. I am now off to
collapse into my bed for some much-needed rest. :-)





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: SharePoint Server

[Bob Fronk]

I have setup a test machine... Looks like I need to buy some books or
find a hands-on class nearby.

 

Bob

 

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SharePoint Server

 

We are getting ready to pilot SP for much the same purpose.

 

The potential SQL server size scares me.

 

-sc

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SharePoint Server

 

I am gearing up to deploy SharePoint Server 2007.  The main goal is to
help eliminate "Outlook as a file transport", but eliminate the 100's of
file shares we have.  But I also know there is much more to the product.

 

I would appreciate replies from those that have deployed SharePoint or
have SharePoint experience on what your deployment experience was and
what you would or wouldn't do again.  

 

Also, anyone have SharePoint running in a VM?   

 

As I type this, I am loading up a test server to experience the install
process and do some testing. 

 

Thanks for any info.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: SharePoint Server

[Michael B. Smith]

I wouldn't think that SharePoint in a VM is a real problem, per se - as
always, I recommend database servers be in hardware, but that's my personal
prejudice.

 

You should always size a machine to meet the needs of your user community.
If you don't know what those needs are, buy big and ramp up from there. J

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 3:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SharePoint Server

 

I have setup a test machine. Looks like I need to buy some books or find a
hands-on class nearby.

 

Bob

 

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SharePoint Server

 

We are getting ready to pilot SP for much the same purpose.

 

The potential SQL server size scares me.

 

-sc

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SharePoint Server

 

I am gearing up to deploy SharePoint Server 2007.  The main goal is to help
eliminate "Outlook as a file transport", but eliminate the 100's of file
shares we have.  But I also know there is much more to the product.

 

I would appreciate replies from those that have deployed SharePoint or have
SharePoint experience on what your deployment experience was and what you
would or wouldn't do again.  

 

Also, anyone have SharePoint running in a VM?   

 

As I type this, I am loading up a test server to experience the install
process and do some testing. 

 

Thanks for any info.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: SharePoint Server

[Sherry Abercrombie]

I have Sharepoint and it's SQL server both in VMWare.  Have had it on VMWare
for years, no issues.  We do have the SQL server on a different VM guest
machine (it's used for more than just the Sharepoint DB).  Would I do it
again, sure, it's been very stable.

Would recommend a good book or hands on class.  I went to a hands on 3 day
admin class a couple of years after implementing Sharepoint and it was very
useful.  I would not recommend allowing users the ability to create sites
and most users need nothing more than Web-Developer permission level.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  I have setup a test machine… Looks like I need to buy some books or find
> a hands-on class nearby.
>
>
>
> Bob
>
>
>
> *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:40 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: SharePoint Server
>
>
>
> We are getting ready to pilot SP for much the same purpose.
>
>
>
> The potential SQL server size scares me.
>
>
>
> -sc
>
>
>
> *From:* Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:16 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* SharePoint Server
>
>
>
> I am gearing up to deploy SharePoint Server 2007.  The main goal is to help
> eliminate "Outlook as a file transport", but eliminate the 100's of file
> shares we have.  But I also know there is much more to the product.
>
>
>
> I would appreciate replies from those that have deployed SharePoint or have
> SharePoint experience on what your deployment experience was and what you
> would or wouldn't do again.
>
>
>
> Also, anyone have SharePoint running in a VM?
>
>
>
> As I type this, I am loading up a test server to experience the install
> process and do some testing.
>
>
>
> Thanks for any info.
>
>
>
> Bob Fronk
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: SharePoint Server

[Peter Rabe]

Microsoft has good documentation for MOSS at:

 

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc303422.aspx

 

The Pocket Administrator's book provides most of the day-to-day answers.

 

We have had WSS running for almost 2 years and are working on the
migration to MOSS.  Development MOSS web and app servers are already
running on Server 2008.

 

SQL will stay on a physical machine, but there is not any reason to put
the app and web on VMs.

 

 

Peter Rabe

Server Specialist

Hy Cite Corporation

 

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: December 09, 2008 2:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SharePoint Server

 

I have setup a test machine... Looks like I need to buy some books or
find a hands-on class nearby.

 

Bob

 

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SharePoint Server

 

We are getting ready to pilot SP for much the same purpose.

 

The potential SQL server size scares me.

 

-sc

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SharePoint Server

 

I am gearing up to deploy SharePoint Server 2007.  The main goal is to
help eliminate "Outlook as a file transport", but eliminate the 100's of
file shares we have.  But I also know there is much more to the product.

 

I would appreciate replies from those that have deployed SharePoint or
have SharePoint experience on what your deployment experience was and
what you would or wouldn't do again.  

 

Also, anyone have SharePoint running in a VM?   

 

As I type this, I am loading up a test server to experience the install
process and do some testing. 

 

Thanks for any info.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: SharePoint Server

[Troy Meyer]

Check out some of the resources at wssdemo.com.  One thing we did that seems to 
have been nice is install the Microsoft online MOSS end-user training.  This is 
a nice package from Microsoft that runs as its own site collection (we gave it 
a separate internal domain name) and you can send users there and have them 
see\participate in different types of interactive training within SharePoint.  
We barely scrape the surface of its possibilities, and its an easy sell (free)

Good luck on the deployment, as previously stated by David, planning now will 
make a world of difference later.

-Troy



-Original Message-
From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 12:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SharePoint Server

I have setup a test machine... Looks like I need to buy some books or find a 
hands-on class nearby.

 

Bob

 

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SharePoint Server

 

We are getting ready to pilot SP for much the same purpose.

 

The potential SQL server size scares me.

 

-sc

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SharePoint Server

 

I am gearing up to deploy SharePoint Server 2007.  The main goal is to help 
eliminate "Outlook as a file transport", but eliminate the 100's of file shares 
we have.  But I also know there is much more to the product.

 

I would appreciate replies from those that have deployed SharePoint or have 
SharePoint experience on what your deployment experience was and what you would 
or wouldn't do again.  

 

Also, anyone have SharePoint running in a VM?   

 

As I type this, I am loading up a test server to experience the install process 
and do some testing. 

 

Thanks for any info.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Declining an already approved WSUS update

[Robert Cato]

http://www.windowsecurity.com/articles/How-Force-Remote-Group-Policy-Processing.html
psexec = must have
flex command.hta = looks promising

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:43 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> "Alex Carroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/09/2008 11:34:36 AM:
>
> > You could always do a "wuauclt.exe /resetauthorization /detectnow"
> > on the client – that will force it to report to the WSUS server and
> > then it will go away now instead of having to wait for them to
> > report… just to make sure that waiting will work.
>
>
> That is what I did, on the WSUS server. And the V3 Framework did not then
> appear on the list of waiting updates.
>
> Since I don't have an easy way to run the "detectnow" on all the other
> clients automatically, I will just wait for them to check in and update
> themselves normally.
>
> Thanks
>
> >
> > Alex Carroll
> > Software Support
> > Crabtree Companies, Inc.
> > 651-688-2727
> >
> >
> > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 10:20 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Declining an already approved WSUS update
> >
> > I think it will go away next time the clients report in.
> >
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:21 AM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Declining an already approved WSUS update
> >
> >
> > I made a bonehead mistake, and approved the installation of .NET
> > Framework 3.0 (I wanted to just approve the updates to it, so that
> > any system that had it was updated,  but didn't want to just
> > generally install it). Luckily, none of my WSUS clients auto-
> > install., so it didn't get pushed out to the clients. But I did see
> > that WSUS thought a substantial number of clients needed it, and now
> > I see that update on the clients, as an update waiting to be downloaded..
>
> >
> > Now I've gone back into the list of approved updates, and declined
> > that specific item. I'm hoping that any of the systems that had been
> > listed as "needing installation" from when it was approved, will now
> > just remove that item from the list of needed updates, the next time
> > the clients check into the WSUS server? For example, I still see it
> > in the list of updates waiting to be downloaded on the WSUS server
> > itself, even after declining the update and rebooting.
> >
> > What else do I need to do, to ensure that the v3 Framework is not
> > installed on the clients?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --
> > Michael Leone
> > Network Administrator, ISM
> > Philadelphia Housing Authority
> > 2500 Jackson St
> > Philadelphia, PA 19145
> > Tel:  215-684-4180
> > Cell: 215-252-0143
> > 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Double trouble

[Ben Scott]

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Sean Rector <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Congratulations, James!
> Welcome James (Jr.?) and Jacob!

  James 2.0.

  (I'm going, I'm going...)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Looking for wireless solution for business.

[Mark A. Ross]

Wireless question -
 
We have a small, single story office with approx 25 people. We have a
dedicated T1, which is connected to our Firewall, then switch. I am
seeking a wireless solution that does not connect between our firewall
and T1. In short, I am looking for a solution that connects behind the
switch. All Wireless routers that I know of connect between the firewall
and switch.
 
Thanks in advance -
 
 
Mark A. Ross
I.T. Manager
Southland Data Processing
912 Monte Vista Avenue
Upland, Ca. 91786-9825
 
 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Looking for wireless solution for business.

[Erik Goldoff]

sounds like you need a wireless 'access point' or 'bridge' and NOT a router
... something like this maybe :
 
http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_Product_C2

&childpagename=US%2FLayout&cid=1126536803676&pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVis
itorWrapper&lid=0367645678B09
 
http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_Product_C2

&childpagename=US%2FLayout&cid=1172713082281&pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVis
itorWrapper&lid=8228145678B01
 
 
 

Erik Goldoff

IT  Consultant
Systems, Networks, & Security 
 

  _  

From: Mark A. Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Looking for wireless solution for business.


Wireless question -
 
We have a small, single story office with approx 25 people. We have a
dedicated T1, which is connected to our Firewall, then switch. I am seeking
a wireless solution that does not connect between our firewall and T1. In
short, I am looking for a solution that connects behind the switch. All
Wireless routers that I know of connect between the firewall and switch.
 
Thanks in advance -
 
 
Mark A. Ross
I.T. Manager
Southland Data Processing
912 Monte Vista Avenue
Upland, Ca. 91786-9825
 
 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: SAN question

[Kurt Buff]

I've been quite pleased with my two Lefthand units. About 4tb each
unit, mirrored, for around $15k, IIRC.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:00 AM, Tom Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I'm looking at Dell Equallogic arrays PS5000 series.  The look pretty good
> for what we need here, but price is steep for my agency (starting at around
> $45k just for the disks and enclosure).  Anyone have any alternative vendors
> to suggest?  SAN will be used for databases, logging, maybe some file and
> print data.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
> privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
> message.
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Looking for wireless solution for business.

[Benjamin Zachary - Lists]

You could also use any cable/dsl wireless router and just don't use the wan
port. Plug the one of the lan ports into your switch for dhcp/dns and the
clients can connect wirelessly.

 

From: Mark A. Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 19:01
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Looking for wireless solution for business.

 

Wireless question -

 

We have a small, single story office with approx 25 people. We have a
dedicated T1, which is connected to our Firewall, then switch. I am seeking
a wireless solution that does not connect between our firewall and T1. In
short, I am looking for a solution that connects behind the switch. All
Wireless routers that I know of connect between the firewall and switch.

 

Thanks in advance -

 

 

Mark A. Ross

I.T. Manager

Southland Data Processing

912 Monte Vista Avenue

Upland, Ca. 91786-9825

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Looking for wireless solution for business.

[Mike Gill]

The WRT54GL is cheaper than the WAP54G. Disable DHCP and you basically have
an AP with three extra switch ports. Install DD-WRT and you can make the WAN
port into an extra switch port as well as a whole slew of other
possibilities.

 

-- 
Mike Gill

 

From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 4:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Looking for wireless solution for business.

 

sounds like you need a wireless 'access point' or 'bridge' and NOT a router
... something like this maybe :

 

http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_Product_C2

&childpagename=US%2FLayout&cid=1126536803676&pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVis
itorWrapper&lid=0367645678B09

 

http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_Product_C2

&childpagename=US%2FLayout&cid=1172713082281&pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVis
itorWrapper&lid=8228145678B01

 

 

 


Erik Goldoff


IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

 

 

  _  

From: Mark A. Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Looking for wireless solution for business.

Wireless question -

 

We have a small, single story office with approx 25 people. We have a
dedicated T1, which is connected to our Firewall, then switch. I am seeking
a wireless solution that does not connect between our firewall and T1. In
short, I am looking for a solution that connects behind the switch. All
Wireless routers that I know of connect between the firewall and switch.

 

Thanks in advance -

 

 

Mark A. Ross

I.T. Manager

Southland Data Processing

912 Monte Vista Avenue

Upland, Ca. 91786-9825

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

VLAN concepts and applications

[Ben Scott]

  Someone asked me off-list for an explanation of some VLAN stuff.
They agreed to let me post my response to the list, for discussion,
review, etc.  If anyone has corrections/additions/etc., please
contribute.

PROTOCOL CONCEPTS

  We have regular "untagged" Ethernet frames.  ("Frame" is the
data-link (layer 2) term for what some protocols calls a "packet" or
"datagram".)  These are the same Ethernet frames from before VLANs
were invented.

  Then we have "tagged" frames.  These take a regular Ethernet frame
and add a marker -- the "tag".  The tag itself contains the VLAN
number (along with a priority code).  Thus, a tagged frame is
associated with a particular VLAN number.

Inside the frame, the tag is basically just a reserved Ethernet
frame type, followed by the tag information, followed by the rest of
the original frame (complete with its original frame type).  So to
network nodes which are *not* VLAN aware, a tagged frame looks just
like a regular Ethernet frame, but with an "unknown" frame type.

  For computers, a VLAN-aware network stack will usually turn each
VLAN into a separate network interface, as if each VLAN was a
different network card with a different cable.  The "stock" network
stack included with Win 2000/XP does *not* include VLAN capability, so
they can only handle untagged frames.  Tagged frames will generally be
silently ignored.  Third-party software (often included with high-end
network cards) can add VLAN capability.  I'm not sure about
2003/Vista/2008.

Switches which are not VLAN-aware, along with any repeaters, will
treat tagged frames exactly like they do any other frame.

SWITCH CONCEPTS

  Switches which are VLAN-aware generally let you control which ports
are associated with which VLAN(s).  The terminology, commands, etc.,
will vary with manufacturer.  I'm most familiar with the HP ProCruve
managed witches, so I'll speak mostly to that.  The concepts should
carry over to other manufacturers.  Hopefully others can chime in with
specifics.

  With HP, you can tell the switch that each VLAN is tagged, untagged,
or not available for each port.  Internally, frames are *always*
associated a VLAN number.  The configuration just tells the switch
which VLANs go with which ports, and which VLAN number to use for
untagged frames.

  When the switch receives an untagged frame, it needs to know what
VLAN to associate it with.  If the port has an untagged VLAN
associated it, the fame will go to that VLAN.  If there is no untagged
VLAN associated with the port, the frame is dropped.  This is why a
port can have (at most) one untagged VLAN associated with it -- how
could the switch know which one to use otherwise?

  When the switch receives a tagged frame, it simply checks to see if
that VLAN is associated with the port.  If so, it accepts it; if not,
it drops it.  This is basically just an access control mechanism.

  When the switch has a frame to *transmit*, it only considers ports
which are associated with the frame's VLAN.  If a port is configured
as tagged for the frame's VLAN, it transmits the frame with the VLAN
tag.  If a port is configured as untagged for the VLAN, the frame is
transmitted on that port without a VLAN tag.

APPLICATIONS

  Okay, enough conceptual stuff, how do we use it?

  At %DAYJOB%, we've got VLANs as follows:

1 – Reserved
2 – Main company private network
3 – Guest network
4 – ISP uplink
5 – IP telephony

  We don't use VLAN 1 because that's the default on most things, and
to avoid confusion we avoid it.

  VLAN 2 is where most traffic is.  Most ports are configured as
untagged for VLAN 2.  The computers, printers, etc., plugged into
those ports aren't even aware they are on a VLAN.  All the employee
workstations are like this, as are most servers.  The syntax to
configure this is easy.  For example, if I want port 1 to be untagged
for VLAN 2 like this:

vlan 2 untagged 1

  VLAN 3 is for guests (visitors).  For obvious reasons, we don't let
them plug in to our main network.  They get a separate IP subnet, a
separate DHCP server, and bypass much of our network filtering.  This
is also where our wireless access points connect (employees use
VPN-over-wireless).  Again, all untagged, and connected nodes are not
aware of the VLAN.

  VLAN 4 exists because we've got a cable Internet feed we use for
employee web browsing.  Circumstances meant the cable modem had to go
in a different building from the main server/network room.  (We have
another feed for important stuff; that terminates in the server room.)
 So the cable modem plugs into a particular switch port, which uses
VLAN 4 to carry it to our firewall in a different building.  Again,
untagged, unaware.

  VLAN 5 is for premises voice-over-IP, a project which I'm still in
the middle of.  My plan is to let the phones be VLAN-aware and tagged
everywhere, so they operate "outside" the regular network.  In theory,
it should be possible to have a phone tagged on VLAN 5 and a computer
untagged on VLA

Re: SAN question

[Durf]

So far I have to agree on the  MD3000i units.  They are no-frills, but
with all you can do on the application layer these days in terms of
backup, snapshots, images and so forth I don't miss the extra features
for the midrange.  When you start wanting to get into large-scale
replication you may miss it, but if you just want cheap storage on a
stick the price is very hard to beat.

-- Durf

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Matthew Bullock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want to stick with Dell, check out the MD3000i iSCSI unit.
>
>
>
> mb
>
>
>
> From: Tom Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:00 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: SAN question
>
>
>
> Hello:
>
>
>
> I'm looking at Dell Equallogic arrays PS5000 series.  The look pretty good
> for what we need here, but price is steep for my agency (starting at around
> $45k just for the disks and enclosure).  Anyone have any alternative vendors
> to suggest?  SAN will be used for databases, logging, maybe some file and
> print data.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
> privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
> message.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
--
Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day.
Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks!

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Looking for wireless solution for business.

[Mark Boersma]

You didn't specify how many users you will have on the wireless, I'm
assuming all 25 current users and wired.  If you will have no more than
2-3 wireless users the recommended Linksys ap's would work fine.
However, if you are going to have more than 3 simultaneous users you
NEED to consider a more serious access point.  3com, HP and may others
make business class routers.  I just wanted to throw out the point that
you really really don't want more than 2 or 3 simultaneous users on a
home class ap like a Linksys.  Personal note, don't consider the Linksys
"business class" routers as a good candidate. 

 

Mark

-

Two rules to success in life:

1. Never tell people everything you know.

 

 

From: Mark A. Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Looking for wireless solution for business.

 

Wireless question -

 

We have a small, single story office with approx 25 people. We have a
dedicated T1, which is connected to our Firewall, then switch. I am
seeking a wireless solution that does not connect between our firewall
and T1. In short, I am looking for a solution that connects behind the
switch. All Wireless routers that I know of connect between the firewall
and switch.

 

Thanks in advance -

 

 

Mark A. Ross

I.T. Manager

Southland Data Processing

912 Monte Vista Avenue

Upland, Ca. 91786-9825

 

 

 

 

 


Please consider the environment before printing this email.


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipients(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Looking for wireless solution for business.

[Jon Harris]

I agree with Mark.  The Linksys works but the best I have done without
issues on one is 5 users and none of them were heavy users.  I know for the
one I have at home when my wife is watching her shows online and I try to
work it has major delays for me.

Jon

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Mark Boersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>  You didn't specify how many users you will have on the wireless, I'm
> assuming all 25 current users and wired.  If you will have no more than 2-3
> wireless users the recommended Linksys ap's would work fine.  However, if
> you are going to have more than 3 simultaneous users you NEED to consider a
> more serious access point.  3com, HP and may others make business class
> routers.  I just wanted to throw out the point that you really really don't
> want more than 2 or 3 simultaneous users on a home class ap like a Linksys.
> Personal note, don't consider the Linksys "business class" routers as a good
> candidate.
>
>
>
> Mark
>
> -
>
> Two rules to success in life:
>
> 1. Never tell people everything you know.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Mark A. Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:01 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Looking for wireless solution for business.
>
>
>
> Wireless question -
>
>
>
> We have a small, single story office with approx 25 people. We have a
> dedicated T1, which is connected to our Firewall, then switch. I am seeking
> a wireless solution that *does not* connect between our firewall and T1.
> In short, I am looking for a solution that connects behind the switch. All
> Wireless routers that I know of connect between the firewall and switch.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance -
>
>
>
>
>
> *Mark A. Ross*
>
> I.T. Manager
>
> Southland Data Processing
>
> 912 Monte Vista Avenue
>
> Upland, Ca. 91786-9825
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  --
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> 
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
> for the sole use of the intended recipients(s) and may contain confidential
> and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
> message.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Print to html?

[Angus Scott-Fleming]

On 9 Dec 2008 at 10:55, Bill Monicher  wrote:

> From your reply I'm guessing that you had assumed I had not tried the
> google route, 

In the absence of your explicitly stating "I googled and found the following" I 
ass*u*med that you hadn't (possibly a bad assumption for THIS list, but you 
never _know_ for sure even here ;-) ...

> and I'm further guesing that you know about as much of 
> these things as I.

Yeppers, no need here.  But these days my google-fu seems to be working 
adequately so I don't mind sharing [g,d,rlh]

--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~