Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro
What's your problem? On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:58 PM, NTSysAdmin wrote: Dear dear dear...how did you become an IT manager??? S -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 6:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Remote mirror with XP Pro Good afternoon, I thought you could set up a software mirror through XP Pro, but now that I sat down to do it, I realize I can't. In researching the issue, I see that you can create a mirror on a remote system, but only see references to 200 Server. Does anyone know if this can be done to a 2003 Server volume? Instead of having two local drives configured as a mirrored volume, I'd like to mirror a drive on the XP box to a drive on a 2003 server. This would be done over a gigabit network, BTW. Thanks, Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Facts, thoughts, references for security intrusion (espionage) reporting
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr michealespin...@gmail.com wrote: I was wondering if anyone would care to share any anecdotes, stories, procedures they went through in following though with a security intrusion - with ISP logs, involving the authorities, etc. In the private sector, you generally have to go through the law enforcement agencies which have juristiction. In the US, if it appears to cross state or international lines (typical), your main option is to contact the FBI. Keep in mind that they are generally overwhelmed and thus small stuff tends to fall through the cracks. If it's international and involves certain countries, however, you'll get a better response. Be warned that affected computers may be seized as evidence. See also: http://www.fbi.gov/cyberinvest/cyberhome.htm Where I work, we're mainly a DoD subcontractor, so we have our own channels. I'll see if anyone knows of any other avenues for private sector people. Generic advice: Save all logs from everything to offline archives as soon as you discoverer an intrusion attempt. If it's a compromise, ideally, take the affected system(s) offline as soon as you discover it. Make complete block-level images of each individual disks before putting them back online. If there is evidence of system-level compromise (Administrator, root kit, etc.) wipe-and-reload the entire system. Contacting ISPs can be a mixed bag. They often don't log what you need info on. When they do, it will often be rotated on a short time span. Then getting through to someone with clue before the logs get deleted is often the hard part. OTOH, when this does pay off it's some of the best kind of evidence. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: File names that are too long - Can they be stopped?
Thanks for the feedback Ben. On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Eric Wittersheim eric.wittersh...@gmail.com wrote: Is there anyway to enforce a limit (Windows Server 2000 and 2003) on the length of file names? Not that I know of. If you find one, let me know, 'cause I got the same problem in different ways. Part of the problem is that not all parts of Windows have the same path/file name length limits. Reportedly NTFS itself and the innards of the NT kernel can handle names on the order of thousands of characters long, but that's mainly academic because the higher-level stuff falls apart much earlier. The Win32 subsystem (which practically everything uses) is limited to 255 characters, I believe. Vital system components -- like Windows Explorer and the shell libraries -- seem to have even shorter limits. One of my favorites is users creating files in their local profile that work just fine, but then the roaming profile sync code pukes trying to sync back to the server. (Though I haven't seen that in a while; it may have been fixed in XP SP2.) Another part of the problem is that path name lengths can vary depending on how the system is seeing a file. For example, if I have C:\Company\Shared\Quality\Public\QMSDocs on the server shared as QMSDocs, and the workstations map that share as drive Q:, and then there's Q:\some\really\absurdly\ridiculously\ludicrously\long\path\name\to\a\file.doc, then it may be okay for the mapped path on the workstation, but on the server it will be C:\Company\Shared\Quality\Public\QMSDocs\some\really\absurdly\ridiculously\ludicrously\long\path\name\to\a\file.doc which pushes Explorer over the limit. Result? You can access the files from Explorer on a workstation, but not Explorer on the server. The filesystems typically used on CDs and DVDs have their own limits which are different from all of the above. So one thing that may help the CD archive scenario is to put all the files into an archive format which handles really long file names, like 7-Zip's .7z format. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro
Somebody already mentioned robocopy that can accomplish this. Another option is SyncBack. -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro What's your problem? On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:58 PM, NTSysAdmin wrote: Dear dear dear...how did you become an IT manager??? S -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 6:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Remote mirror with XP Pro Good afternoon, I thought you could set up a software mirror through XP Pro, but now that I sat down to do it, I realize I can't. In researching the issue, I see that you can create a mirror on a remote system, but only see references to 200 Server. Does anyone know if this can be done to a 2003 Server volume? Instead of having two local drives configured as a mirrored volume, I'd like to mirror a drive on the XP box to a drive on a 2003 server. This would be done over a gigabit network, BTW. Thanks, Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Confidentiality Notice: -- This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Central monitoring of PC performance
I use Spiceworks - it's free. Sean Rector, MCSE -Original Message- From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 6:15 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Central monitoring of PC performance Microsoft makes a bunch of tools... System Center Ops Manager System Center Config Manager Or System Center Essentials (if you have a smaller shop) Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Travis Krampy [mailto:traviskra...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 8 January 2009 8:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Central monitoring of PC performance Hi All, I was just wondering if anyone is using a central management tool to monitor all your PC's (disk space, CPU, Memory, software assessments, etc...). If so, can they be used to proactively monitor and alert IT staff? Thanks Travis ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ 2008-2009 Season: Tosca | The Barber of Seville Recently Announced: Virginia Opera's 35th Anniversary Season 2009-2010 Visit us online at www.vaopera.org or call 1.866.OPERA.VA This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). Unless otherwise specified, persons unnamed as recipients may not read, distribute, copy or alter this e-mail. Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail belong to the author and may not necessarily represent those of Virginia Opera. Although precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present, Virginia Opera cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that may arise from the use of this e-mail or attachments. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman Drum Brae Solutions Ltd ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Public beta tomorrow. I'll have to wait as I don't have MSDN. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 cbo...@vector-co.com You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:m...@drumbrae.net] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 08:17 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman Drum Brae Solutions Ltd ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Anyone have any inside info? Are we talking 12:01am tomorrow, or more like 4:00pm in the afternoon? On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Christopher J. Bosak cbo...@vector-co.com wrote: Public beta tomorrow. I'll have to wait as I don't have MSDN. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 cbo...@vector-co.com You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:m...@drumbrae.net] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 08:17 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman Drum Brae Solutions Ltd ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
According to a Microsoft Employee blog, they don't have a set time for when it will be online. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 cbo...@vector-co.com You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me -Original Message- From: Jon D [mailto:rekcahp...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 08:25 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Anyone have any inside info? Are we talking 12:01am tomorrow, or more like 4:00pm in the afternoon? On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Christopher J. Bosak cbo...@vector-co.com wrote: Public beta tomorrow. I'll have to wait as I don't have MSDN. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 cbo...@vector-co.com You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:m...@drumbrae.net] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 08:17 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman Drum Brae Solutions Ltd ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Jon D rekcahp...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone have any inside info? Are we talking 12:01am tomorrow, or more like 4:00pm in the afternoon? Everybody lied, it'll be available the day after tomorrow. (In other words: Sheesh, does it matter that much? If you're that worried about the precise minute of release, wait another day and the question is moot. :) ) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Actually, they are only letting 2.5 million downloads for this. Once it's gone, it's gone. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 cbo...@vector-co.com You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 09:03 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Jon D rekcahp...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone have any inside info? Are we talking 12:01am tomorrow, or more like 4:00pm in the afternoon? Everybody lied, it'll be available the day after tomorrow. (In other words: Sheesh, does it matter that much? If you're that worried about the precise minute of release, wait another day and the question is moot. :) ) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
It is available now on MSDN Technet. It is available to the public 12:00am your time Friday. S -Original Message- From: Jon D [mailto:rekcahp...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:25 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Anyone have any inside info? Are we talking 12:01am tomorrow, or more like 4:00pm in the afternoon? On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Christopher J. Bosak cbo...@vector-co.com wrote: Public beta tomorrow. I'll have to wait as I don't have MSDN. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 cbo...@vector-co.com You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:m...@drumbrae.net] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 08:17 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman Drum Brae Solutions Ltd ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
It is also on the partner website. -Original Message- From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of NTSysAdmin Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now It is available now on MSDN Technet. It is available to the public 12:00am your time Friday. S -Original Message- From: Jon D [mailto:rekcahp...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:25 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Anyone have any inside info? Are we talking 12:01am tomorrow, or more like 4:00pm in the afternoon? On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Christopher J. Bosak cbo...@vector-co.com wrote: Public beta tomorrow. I'll have to wait as I don't have MSDN. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 cbo...@vector-co.com You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:m...@drumbrae.net] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 08:17 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman Drum Brae Solutions Ltd ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
It was on MSDN last night. Jon D wrote: Anyone have any inside info? Are we talking 12:01am tomorrow, or more like 4:00pm in the afternoon? -- Phil Brutsche p...@optimumdata.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Shame my internet access at work is so pants Guess I'll have to wait till I get home to grab a copy. -Original Message- From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com] Sent: 08 January 2009 15:31 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now It was on MSDN last night. Jon D wrote: Anyone have any inside info? Are we talking 12:01am tomorrow, or more like 4:00pm in the afternoon? -- Phil Brutsche p...@optimumdata.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ The information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s). The information in this communication may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Nothing in this e-mail is intended to conclude a contract on behalf of QinetiQ or make QinetiQ subject to any other legally binding commitments, unless the e-mail contains an express statement to the contrary or incorporates a formal Purchase Order. For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is prohibited and may be unlawful. Emails and other electronic communication with QinetiQ may be monitored and recorded for business purposes including security, audit and archival purposes. Any response to this email indicates consent to this. Telephone calls to QinetiQ may be monitored or recorded for quality control, security and other business purposes. QinetiQ Limited Registered in England Wales: Company Number:3796233 Registered office: 85 Buckingham Gate, London SW1E 6PD, United Kingdom Trading address: Cody Technology Park, Cody Building, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 0LX, United Kingdom http://www.qinetiq.com/home/notices/legal.html ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
There's only 2.5 million downloads allowed is the only reason I'm asking. I'm not sure how many people throughout the world will want it, but I can't imagine it will be up for more than a day. On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Jon D rekcahp...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone have any inside info? Are we talking 12:01am tomorrow, or more like 4:00pm in the afternoon? Everybody lied, it'll be available the day after tomorrow. (In other words: Sheesh, does it matter that much? If you're that worried about the precise minute of release, wait another day and the question is moot. :) ) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro
Folks, Lets not bash others on the list.. keep your personal comments to yourself. He is asking for help, and we should give it to him, not question his position and this and that.. Thanks Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization Email: ezi...@lifespan.org Phone: 401-639-3505 MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + -Original Message- From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro Somebody already mentioned robocopy that can accomplish this. Another option is SyncBack. -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro What's your problem? On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:58 PM, NTSysAdmin wrote: Dear dear dear...how did you become an IT manager??? S -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 6:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Remote mirror with XP Pro Good afternoon, I thought you could set up a software mirror through XP Pro, but now that I sat down to do it, I realize I can't. In researching the issue, I see that you can create a mirror on a remote system, but only see references to 200 Server. Does anyone know if this can be done to a 2003 Server volume? Instead of having two local drives configured as a mirrored volume, I'd like to mirror a drive on the XP box to a drive on a 2003 server. This would be done over a gigabit network, BTW. Thanks, Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Confidentiality Notice: -- This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Upgrading DCs to 64 bit
We have two 64-bit 2003 DCs alongside our 32-bit DCs that have been humming along happily for at least a year now. No WS08 DCs installed yet, but we just extended our schema for WS08 over the winter break and that went well-still ticking along. We've also had to keep a 32-bit DC for GPMC, but I'm hoping when we get to WS08 I can get rid of that. BTW, just to clarify, AFAIK, there is no direct upgrade path at the server level-the DCs I installed as x64 had to be rebuilt. -Bonnie From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 7:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Upgrading DCs to 64 bit I have been running a mix of 32 and 64-bit DCs for over a year with no ill effects at all. I prefer the performance gains I receive from running 64-bit, but not all MS management tools (GPMC in particular) would run on 64-bit prior to Server 2008's release, so I had to keep at least 1 32-bit server around for that purpose. TVK From: Webb, Brian (Corp) [mailto:brian.w...@teldta.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 9:37 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Upgrading DCs to 64 bit Has anyone upgraded their 2003 domain from 32 bit DCs to 64 bit DCs? Our security team wants to move to 64 bit to take advantage of the larger event logs - anyone done it? Were there any issues running some DCs 32 bit and some 64 bit? Anyone run a mixed environment long term? I'm planning on doing some testing, but wanted some advance scouting if available. Brian Webb - MCSE TDS Corporate IS, Windows Server Platform Team Senior Systems Administrator When stuck on a problem as often can be, try to remember G.B.T.T.D. (Go Back To The Definition). - Dave Seybold ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro
+1 We all need to learn stuff sometimes... 2009/1/8 Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org Folks, Lets not bash others on the list.. keep your personal comments to yourself. He is asking for help, and we should give it to him, not question his position and this and that.. Thanks Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization Email: ezi...@lifespan.org Phone: 401-639-3505 MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + -Original Message- From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro Somebody already mentioned robocopy that can accomplish this. Another option is SyncBack. -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro What's your problem? On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:58 PM, NTSysAdmin wrote: Dear dear dear...how did you become an IT manager??? S -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 6:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Remote mirror with XP Pro Good afternoon, I thought you could set up a software mirror through XP Pro, but now that I sat down to do it, I realize I can't. In researching the issue, I see that you can create a mirror on a remote system, but only see references to 200 Server. Does anyone know if this can be done to a 2003 Server volume? Instead of having two local drives configured as a mirrored volume, I'd like to mirror a drive on the XP box to a drive on a 2003 server. This would be done over a gigabit network, BTW. Thanks, Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Confidentiality Notice: -- This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro
It wasn't a comment, it was a question. I'm damn sure I'd want to work for an IT manager with a beginners knowledge of systems... S -Original Message- From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro Folks, Lets not bash others on the list.. keep your personal comments to yourself. He is asking for help, and we should give it to him, not question his position and this and that.. Thanks Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization Email: ezi...@lifespan.org Phone: 401-639-3505 MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + -Original Message- From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro Somebody already mentioned robocopy that can accomplish this. Another option is SyncBack. -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro What's your problem? On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:58 PM, NTSysAdmin wrote: Dear dear dear...how did you become an IT manager??? S -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 6:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Remote mirror with XP Pro Good afternoon, I thought you could set up a software mirror through XP Pro, but now that I sat down to do it, I realize I can't. In researching the issue, I see that you can create a mirror on a remote system, but only see references to 200 Server. Does anyone know if this can be done to a 2003 Server volume? Instead of having two local drives configured as a mirrored volume, I'd like to mirror a drive on the XP box to a drive on a 2003 server. This would be done over a gigabit network, BTW. Thanks, Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Confidentiality Notice: -- This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Jon D rekcahp...@gmail.com wrote: There's only 2.5 million downloads allowed is the only reason I'm asking. I'm sure it will be reposted on the usual third-party sites approximately 42 seconds after release. :) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, NTSysAdmin ntsysad...@optimum.bm wrote: It wasn't a comment, it was a question. I'm damn sure I'd want to work for an IT manager with a beginners knowledge of systems... Since I guess you know everything you need to know, why are you subscribed to this list? -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Little password generator
Hi chaps, Can anyone recommend a small password generator? I'm after something that, ideally, sits in the systray or has a hotkey assigned to it and is able to generator passwords of predefined length and complexity. Any suggestions? Xyzzy is ideal, but i really want something a bit more out-of-the-way. Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web: http://www.g2support.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro
My IT Manager is just that, a manager. I don't expect him to have the level of knowledge that I do as an Admin/Engineer. I always joke with him that his eyes glaze over when I start speaking technically to him. However, he has a great understanding of the fundamentals and oversees our inhouse software development and IT processes. Thanks, Jake Gardner TTC Network Administrator Ext. 246 -Original Message- From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of NTSysAdmin Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:57 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro It wasn't a comment, it was a question. I'm damn sure I'd want to work for an IT manager with a beginners knowledge of systems... S -Original Message- From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro Folks, Lets not bash others on the list.. keep your personal comments to yourself. He is asking for help, and we should give it to him, not question his position and this and that.. Thanks Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization Email: ezi...@lifespan.org Phone: 401-639-3505 MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + -Original Message- From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro Somebody already mentioned robocopy that can accomplish this. Another option is SyncBack. -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro What's your problem? On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:58 PM, NTSysAdmin wrote: Dear dear dear...how did you become an IT manager??? S -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 6:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Remote mirror with XP Pro Good afternoon, I thought you could set up a software mirror through XP Pro, but now that I sat down to do it, I realize I can't. In researching the issue, I see that you can create a mirror on a remote system, but only see references to 200 Server. Does anyone know if this can be done to a 2003 Server volume? Instead of having two local drives configured as a mirrored volume, I'd like to mirror a drive on the XP box to a drive on a 2003 server. This would be done over a gigabit network, BTW. Thanks, Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Confidentiality Notice: -- This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ***Teletronics Technology Corporation*** This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you may not disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or by telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message and any copies. Thank you. *** ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Little password generator
I just bookmarked this site http://www.pctools.com/guides/password/ no need for an install of software. Thanks, Jake Gardner TTC Network Administrator Ext. 246 -Original Message- From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Little password generator Hi chaps, Can anyone recommend a small password generator? I'm after something that, ideally, sits in the systray or has a hotkey assigned to it and is able to generator passwords of predefined length and complexity. Any suggestions? Xyzzy is ideal, but i really want something a bit more out-of-the-way. Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web: http://www.g2support.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ***Teletronics Technology Corporation*** This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you may not disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or by telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message and any copies. Thank you. *** ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Online Mail Test
I am in a situation where any external access I have to remote systems under my control have port 25 outbound blocked by their isp. I need to do some mail testing where I telnet in and set my from email, compose a message and deliver it in to the mail server. Anyone know of an online mail tester that allows you to specifically set the From address and push out a test email? Thanks! jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Little password generator
Quicky Password Generator http://www.quickysoftware.com On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Oliver Marshall oliver.marsh...@g2support.com wrote: Hi chaps, Can anyone recommend a small password generator? I'm after something that, ideally, sits in the systray or has a hotkey assigned to it and is able to generator passwords of predefined length and complexity. Any suggestions? Xyzzy is ideal, but i really want something a bit more out-of-the-way. Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web:http://www.g2support.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Little password generator
Yeah i saw that too :) However it's browser based and doesn't fit in with being obscure. I would look at one of the several 'gadget' solutions (google desktop, sidebar, konfabulator) but my life seems so much easier WITHOUT a sidebar now. Olly -Original Message- From: Jake Gardner [mailto:jgard...@ttcdas.com] Sent: 08 January 2009 16:13 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Little password generator I just bookmarked this site http://www.pctools.com/guides/password/ no need for an install of software. Thanks, Jake Gardner TTC Network Administrator Ext. 246 -Original Message- From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Little password generator Hi chaps, Can anyone recommend a small password generator? I'm after something that, ideally, sits in the systray or has a hotkey assigned to it and is able to generator passwords of predefined length and complexity. Any suggestions? Xyzzy is ideal, but i really want something a bit more out-of-the-way. Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web: http://www.g2support.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ***Teletronics Technology Corporation*** This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you may not disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or by telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message and any copies. Thank you. *** ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
It was leaked a week ago :) Ben Scott wrote: I'm sure it will be reposted on the usual third-party sites approximately 42 seconds after release. :) -- Phil Brutsche p...@optimumdata.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Little password generator
Doesn't have the ability to hide in the systray (not that i can see) or generate with a hotkey From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 January 2009 16:15 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Little password generator Quicky Password Generator http://www.quickysoftware.com On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Oliver Marshall oliver.marsh...@g2support.commailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com wrote: Hi chaps, Can anyone recommend a small password generator? I'm after something that, ideally, sits in the systray or has a hotkey assigned to it and is able to generator passwords of predefined length and complexity. Any suggestions? Xyzzy is ideal, but i really want something a bit more out-of-the-way. Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.commailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web:http://www.g2support.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro
You may think that is a beginner but see it as maybe something you come to expect of all systems if you work with servers for so long and you just don't pay attention to those kinds of things on clients. Jon On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, NTSysAdmin ntsysad...@optimum.bm wrote: It wasn't a comment, it was a question. I'm damn sure I'd want to work for an IT manager with a beginners knowledge of systems... S -Original Message- From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro Folks, Lets not bash others on the list.. keep your personal comments to yourself. He is asking for help, and we should give it to him, not question his position and this and that.. Thanks Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization Email: ezi...@lifespan.org Phone: 401-639-3505 MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + -Original Message- From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro Somebody already mentioned robocopy that can accomplish this. Another option is SyncBack. -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro What's your problem? On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:58 PM, NTSysAdmin wrote: Dear dear dear...how did you become an IT manager??? S -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 6:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Remote mirror with XP Pro Good afternoon, I thought you could set up a software mirror through XP Pro, but now that I sat down to do it, I realize I can't. In researching the issue, I see that you can create a mirror on a remote system, but only see references to 200 Server. Does anyone know if this can be done to a 2003 Server volume? Instead of having two local drives configured as a mirrored volume, I'd like to mirror a drive on the XP box to a drive on a 2003 server. This would be done over a gigabit network, BTW. Thanks, Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Confidentiality Notice: -- This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro
Dude, you have some issues. I can build a mirrored volume just fine on a server. I can establish RAID 5 as well if you're interested. This is the first time I've wanted to mirror a disk on a desktop. Started to, and realized I couldn't. Started reading why I couldn't, and saw a reference to mirroring data to a remote disk, and it specifically called it a mirror, not a copy or a sync. Thought I'd ask the group here about it. Learning something new, that's all, but thanks for your concern. On Jan 8, 2009, at 10:57 AM, NTSysAdmin wrote: It wasn't a comment, it was a question. I'm damn sure I'd want to work for an IT manager with a beginners knowledge of systems... S -Original Message- From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro Folks, Lets not bash others on the list.. keep your personal comments to yourself. He is asking for help, and we should give it to him, not question his position and this and that.. Thanks Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization Email: ezi...@lifespan.org Phone: 401-639-3505 MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + -Original Message- From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro Somebody already mentioned robocopy that can accomplish this. Another option is SyncBack. -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro What's your problem? On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:58 PM, NTSysAdmin wrote: Dear dear dear...how did you become an IT manager??? S -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 6:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Remote mirror with XP Pro Good afternoon, I thought you could set up a software mirror through XP Pro, but now that I sat down to do it, I realize I can't. In researching the issue, I see that you can create a mirror on a remote system, but only see references to 200 Server. Does anyone know if this can be done to a 2003 Server volume? Instead of having two local drives configured as a mirrored volume, I'd like to mirror a drive on the XP box to a drive on a 2003 server. This would be done over a gigabit network, BTW. Thanks, Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Confidentiality Notice: -- This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Little password generator
I use this myself, has hotkey, master password, keeps passwords and sits on the systray, I use EXE on a USB key and move it anywhere, it's not exactly a password generator but it has that function http://www.dobysoft.com/products/keypass/index.html From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:18 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Little password generator Doesn't have the ability to hide in the systray (not that i can see) or generate with a hotkey From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 January 2009 16:15 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Little password generator Quicky Password Generator http://www.quickysoftware.com On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Oliver Marshall oliver.marsh...@g2support.com wrote: Hi chaps, Can anyone recommend a small password generator? I'm after something that, ideally, sits in the systray or has a hotkey assigned to it and is able to generator passwords of predefined length and complexity. Any suggestions? Xyzzy is ideal, but i really want something a bit more out-of-the-way. Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web:http://www.g2support.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke _ This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and may be protected by attorney/client or other privileges. This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me by e-mail reply and delete the original message and any attachments from your system. _ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out
OK, here's a teaser... All of our AD accounts are gradually being locked out. I have one guy searching for locked out accounts and unlocking them (and they do not get re-locked out) but with 2500 accounts this is more than a PITA. Now, this stinks of a brute force attack on an enumerated list of accounts on the network (we allow 10 attempts then lockout for 30mins), but we can't find _anything_ that looks like this. To compound matters, we have also had a small outbreak of WORM_DOWNAD.AD which has been contained and managed well, but I think this is a red herring as that worm's symptoms are nothing like what we are seeing (and there is no correlation). Does anyone know of a way to find out what processes are attempting to make a logon attempt (we have about 10 DCs spread about the place) to an account - bearing in mind it could be any one of 2500 accounts? Also, is it possible to find out where the logon attempt that caused an account lock came from? Cheers, and TIA, Andy. Andy Crellin Technical Services Manager Leonard Cheshire Disability Telephone: 01904 479200 Email: andy.crel...@lcdisability.org Change the way you see disability. Find out more at www.CreatureDiscomforts.org http://www.creaturediscomforts.org/ Our London Marathon places are almost sold out! Call 020 3242 0376 now to reserve one of the last few places available, or e-mail eve...@lcdisability.org Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete it immediately. Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England Wales) and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 66 South Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1RL. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro
You can theoretically mirror a block device remotely over Ethernet using iSCSI for example, but I think the catch is that mirroring at the block level remotely is much more involved and requires some stable network topology, I am sure you would be better set mirroring at the file level. You can't create a r1 array on a WinXP box anyway IIRC, and I think were you got confused was this: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314343 What that very poorly written article meant to say was you could remotely manage a server and create the array on the server *from* a winxp box. That is such a lame article... jlc -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 9:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro Dude, you have some issues. I can build a mirrored volume just fine on a server. I can establish RAID 5 as well if you're interested. This is the first time I've wanted to mirror a disk on a desktop. Started to, and realized I couldn't. Started reading why I couldn't, and saw a reference to mirroring data to a remote disk, and it specifically called it a mirror, not a copy or a sync. Thought I'd ask the group here about it. Learning something new, that's all, but thanks for your concern. On Jan 8, 2009, at 10:57 AM, NTSysAdmin wrote: It wasn't a comment, it was a question. I'm damn sure I'd want to work for an IT manager with a beginners knowledge of systems... S -Original Message- From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro Folks, Lets not bash others on the list.. keep your personal comments to yourself. He is asking for help, and we should give it to him, not question his position and this and that.. Thanks Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization Email: ezi...@lifespan.org Phone: 401-639-3505 MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + -Original Message- From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro Somebody already mentioned robocopy that can accomplish this. Another option is SyncBack. -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro What's your problem? On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:58 PM, NTSysAdmin wrote: Dear dear dear...how did you become an IT manager??? S -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 6:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Remote mirror with XP Pro Good afternoon, I thought you could set up a software mirror through XP Pro, but now that I sat down to do it, I realize I can't. In researching the issue, I see that you can create a mirror on a remote system, but only see references to 200 Server. Does anyone know if this can be done to a 2003 Server volume? Instead of having two local drives configured as a mirrored volume, I'd like to mirror a drive on the XP box to a drive on a 2003 server. This would be done over a gigabit network, BTW. Thanks, Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Confidentiality Notice: -- This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro
Sorry everyone. Long day so far. I should never have responded to this again, and will let it go. Thanks to all who suggested using robocopy to accomplish this goal (it will work nicely) and to all those who have helped in the past. You guys rock! On Jan 8, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Eric Brouwer wrote: Dude, you have some issues. I can build a mirrored volume just fine on a server. I can establish RAID 5 as well if you're interested. This is the first time I've wanted to mirror a disk on a desktop. Started to, and realized I couldn't. Started reading why I couldn't, and saw a reference to mirroring data to a remote disk, and it specifically called it a mirror, not a copy or a sync. Thought I'd ask the group here about it. Learning something new, that's all, but thanks for your concern. On Jan 8, 2009, at 10:57 AM, NTSysAdmin wrote: It wasn't a comment, it was a question. I'm damn sure I'd want to work for an IT manager with a beginners knowledge of systems... S -Original Message- From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro Folks, Lets not bash others on the list.. keep your personal comments to yourself. He is asking for help, and we should give it to him, not question his position and this and that.. Thanks Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization Email: ezi...@lifespan.org Phone: 401-639-3505 MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + -Original Message- From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Remote mirror with XP Pro Somebody already mentioned robocopy that can accomplish this. Another option is SyncBack. -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Remote mirror with XP Pro What's your problem? On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:58 PM, NTSysAdmin wrote: Dear dear dear...how did you become an IT manager??? S -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:er...@forestpost.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 6:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Remote mirror with XP Pro Good afternoon, I thought you could set up a software mirror through XP Pro, but now that I sat down to do it, I realize I can't. In researching the issue, I see that you can create a mirror on a remote system, but only see references to 200 Server. Does anyone know if this can be done to a 2003 Server volume? Instead of having two local drives configured as a mirrored volume, I'd like to mirror a drive on the XP box to a drive on a 2003 server. This would be done over a gigabit network, BTW. Thanks, Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Confidentiality Notice: -- This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original message. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ Eric Brouwer IT Manager www.forestpost.com er...@forestpost.com 248.855.4333 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Little password generator
Keepass != keypass. Two separate but similar products. ;) From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:30 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Little password generator Heh. WE use keepass here. Didnt even think to look whether it had a generator option J ta From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:cgarciamo...@spragueenergy.com] Sent: 08 January 2009 16:28 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Little password generator I use this myself, has hotkey, master password, keeps passwords and sits on the systray, I use EXE on a USB key and move it anywhere, it's not exactly a password generator but it has that function http://www.dobysoft.com/products/keypass/index.html From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:18 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Little password generator Doesn't have the ability to hide in the systray (not that i can see) or generate with a hotkey From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 January 2009 16:15 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Little password generator Quicky Password Generator http://www.quickysoftware.com On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Oliver Marshall oliver.marsh...@g2support.com wrote: Hi chaps, Can anyone recommend a small password generator? I'm after something that, ideally, sits in the systray or has a hotkey assigned to it and is able to generator passwords of predefined length and complexity. Any suggestions? Xyzzy is ideal, but i really want something a bit more out-of-the-way. Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web:http://www.g2support.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke _ This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and may be protected by attorney/client or other privileges. This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me by e-mail reply and delete the original message and any attachments from your system. _ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out
I would assume you're correct in a brute force attack...here's where I would start, by turning on logging for AD transactions... http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314980 I'll do a little more digging, but that looks like what you want to do at least for your PDC, and probably for all of them. Good luck. Jason From: Andy Crellin [mailto:andy.crel...@lcdisability.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out OK, here's a teaser... All of our AD accounts are gradually being locked out. I have one guy searching for locked out accounts and unlocking them (and they do not get re-locked out) but with 2500 accounts this is more than a PITA. Now, this stinks of a brute force attack on an enumerated list of accounts on the network (we allow 10 attempts then lockout for 30mins), but we can't find _anything_ that looks like this. To compound matters, we have also had a small outbreak of WORM_DOWNAD.AD which has been contained and managed well, but I think this is a red herring as that worm's symptoms are nothing like what we are seeing (and there is no correlation). Does anyone know of a way to find out what processes are attempting to make a logon attempt (we have about 10 DCs spread about the place) to an account - bearing in mind it could be any one of 2500 accounts? Also, is it possible to find out where the logon attempt that caused an account lock came from? Cheers, and TIA, Andy. Andy Crellin Technical Services Manager Leonard Cheshire Disability Telephone: 01904 479200 Email: andy.crel...@lcdisability.org Change the way you see disability. Find out more at www.CreatureDiscomforts.org http://www.creaturediscomforts.org/ Our London Marathon places are almost sold out! Call 020 3242 0376 now to reserve one of the last few places available, or e-mail eve...@lcdisability.org Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete it immediately. Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England Wales) and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 66 South Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1RL. -- The pages accompanying this email transmission contain information from MJMC, Inc., which is confidential and/or privileged. The information is to be for the use of the individual or entity named on this cover sheet. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by telephone so that we can arrange for the retrieval of the original document. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out
You looked into ALOINFO to see if there is a source of the lockouts. I have found that expired credentials on PC trying to re-connect to shares or resources have triggerwed account lockout. And accountlockout.dll http://www.windowsecurity.com/articles/Implementing-Troubleshooting-Acco unt-Lockout.html Also Turn on Kerberos Debugging on the DC's. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/837361 http://blogs.technet.com/ad/archive/2008/05/09/trusted-for-delegation-in -services-for-user-s4u.aspx Kerberos troubleshooting Whitepaper. http://www.microsoft.com/DOWNLOADS/details.aspx?FamilyID=7dfeb015-6043-4 7db-8238-dc7af89c93f1displaylang=en Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization Email: ezi...@lifespan.org Phone: 401-639-3505 MCSE, MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network + From: Andy Crellin [mailto:andy.crel...@lcdisability.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out OK, here's a teaser... All of our AD accounts are gradually being locked out. I have one guy searching for locked out accounts and unlocking them (and they do not get re-locked out) but with 2500 accounts this is more than a PITA. Now, this stinks of a brute force attack on an enumerated list of accounts on the network (we allow 10 attempts then lockout for 30mins), but we can't find _anything_ that looks like this. To compound matters, we have also had a small outbreak of WORM_DOWNAD.AD which has been contained and managed well, but I think this is a red herring as that worm's symptoms are nothing like what we are seeing (and there is no correlation). Does anyone know of a way to find out what processes are attempting to make a logon attempt (we have about 10 DCs spread about the place) to an account - bearing in mind it could be any one of 2500 accounts? Also, is it possible to find out where the logon attempt that caused an account lock came from? Cheers, and TIA, Andy. Andy Crellin Technical Services Manager Leonard Cheshire Disability Telephone: 01904 479200 Email: andy.crel...@lcdisability.org Change the way you see disability. Find out more at www.CreatureDiscomforts.org http://www.creaturediscomforts.org/ Our London Marathon places are almost sold out! Call 020 3242 0376 now to reserve one of the last few places available, or e-mail eve...@lcdisability.org Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete it immediately. Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England Wales) and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 66 South Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1RL. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out
I have a friend who is battling the same type of thing for the last 2 days. He thinks it is the Corn Flicker worm: http://forums.mcafeehelp.com/showthread.php?t=225901 http://www.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2008-112203-24 08-99 http://www.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2008-112203-2 408-99tabid=2 tabid=2 But so far has been unable to verify this. From what he's saying Trend is supposed to catch it (he has the latest definitions), but isn't. Then again, most of his systems are very far out of patch status so that is part of the issue. Are your systems patched for MS08-067 ? Chris Bodnar, MCSE Sr. Systems Engineer Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services Guardian Life Insurance Company of America Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com Phone: 610-807-6459 Fax: 610-807-6003 _ From: Andy Crellin [mailto:andy.crel...@lcdisability.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out OK, here's a teaser... All of our AD accounts are gradually being locked out. I have one guy searching for locked out accounts and unlocking them (and they do not get re-locked out) but with 2500 accounts this is more than a PITA. Now, this stinks of a brute force attack on an enumerated list of accounts on the network (we allow 10 attempts then lockout for 30mins), but we can't find _anything_ that looks like this. To compound matters, we have also had a small outbreak of WORM_DOWNAD.AD which has been contained and managed well, but I think this is a red herring as that worm's symptoms are nothing like what we are seeing (and there is no correlation). Does anyone know of a way to find out what processes are attempting to make a logon attempt (we have about 10 DCs spread about the place) to an account - bearing in mind it could be any one of 2500 accounts? Also, is it possible to find out where the logon attempt that caused an account lock came from? Cheers, and TIA, Andy. Andy Crellin Technical Services Manager Leonard Cheshire Disability Telephone: 01904 479200 Email: andy.crel...@lcdisability.org Change the way you see disability. Find out more at www.CreatureDiscomforts.org http://www.creaturediscomforts.org/ Our London Marathon places are almost sold out! Call 020 3242 0376 now to reserve one of the last few places available, or e-mail eve...@lcdisability.org Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete it immediately. Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England Wales) and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 66 South Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1RL. - This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Yea, but I could find where to download it from. -Original Message- From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:18 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now It was leaked a week ago :) Ben Scott wrote: I'm sure it will be reposted on the usual third-party sites approximately 42 seconds after release. :) -- Phil Brutsche p...@optimumdata.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Online Mail Test
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: I am in a situation where any external access I have to remote systems under my control have port 25 outbound blocked by their isp. I need to do some mail testing where I telnet in and set my from email, compose a message and By telnet in do you mean using Telnet-the-protocol as the remote access protocol to access those remote systems, or using TELNET.EXE to establish a raw TCP connection to an SMTP listener? I'll assume the later, as Telnet-the-protocol is increasingly rare these days. If my guess is wrong, say so. So my next question is: What mail scenario are you trying to test? Are you checking whether an SMTP server at the remote site can receive mail? If so, use your remote access method to get to a system at the remote site, then open your raw TCP connection from there. Are you checking whether mail sent from that site can make it out in general? If so, most ISPs will provide an SMTP relay server. So do TELNET smtp-relay-server.example.net 25 or whatever and relay through that. If ISP requires a password, I can explain how you formulate the required LOGIN string (it's not too hard, and useful to know these days). If you're desiring to probe third-party SMTP servers directly, while physically visiting the remote site, do you have a remote access solution (e.g., VPN, RDP) that will let you connect to a site with a less-bad ISP and test that way? Might be better that way. Web-based interfaces have their own set of issues, the biggest described below. If none of the above apply, describe the scenario better. :) deliver it in to the mail server. Anyone know of an online mail tester that allows you to specifically set the From address and push out a test email? Gmail will let you set your From address, but only after verifying that you can read mail sent to that address (by emailing it a verification code you have to enter back in to the Gmail web UI). I'm guessing you probably won't be able to find a long-lived, usable, completely unrestricted, general-purpose, third-party, web-based mail sending service. They're too tempting a target for spammer abuse. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Online Mail Test
Does this help? https://www.testexchangeconnectivity.com/ From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Online Mail Test I am in a situation where any external access I have to remote systems under my control have port 25 outbound blocked by their isp. I need to do some mail testing where I telnet in and set my from email, compose a message and deliver it in to the mail server. Anyone know of an online mail tester that allows you to specifically set the From address and push out a test email? Thanks! jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Little password generator
Heh. WE use keepass here. Didnt even think to look whether it had a generator option :) ta From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:cgarciamo...@spragueenergy.com] Sent: 08 January 2009 16:28 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Little password generator I use this myself, has hotkey, master password, keeps passwords and sits on the systray, I use EXE on a USB key and move it anywhere, it's not exactly a password generator but it has that function http://www.dobysoft.com/products/keypass/index.html From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:18 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Little password generator Doesn't have the ability to hide in the systray (not that i can see) or generate with a hotkey From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 January 2009 16:15 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Little password generator Quicky Password Generator http://www.quickysoftware.com On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Oliver Marshall oliver.marsh...@g2support.commailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com wrote: Hi chaps, Can anyone recommend a small password generator? I'm after something that, ideally, sits in the systray or has a hotkey assigned to it and is able to generator passwords of predefined length and complexity. Any suggestions? Xyzzy is ideal, but i really want something a bit more out-of-the-way. Olly -- G2 Support Online Backups Email: oliver.marsh...@g2support.commailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com Web:http://www.g2support.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke _ This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and may be protected by attorney/client or other privileges. This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me by e-mail reply and delete the original message and any attachments from your system. _ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Online Mail Test
Can't think of online service, but I am sure one of us could help fire one off for you... From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Online Mail Test I am in a situation where any external access I have to remote systems under my control have port 25 outbound blocked by their isp. I need to do some mail testing where I telnet in and set my from email, compose a message and deliver it in to the mail server. Anyone know of an online mail tester that allows you to specifically set the From address and push out a test email? Thanks! jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out
Thanks for the comments guys - checking some of them out now. Andy Crellin Technical Services Manager Leonard Cheshire Disability Telephone: 01904 479200 E-mail: andy.crel...@lcdisability.org From: Andy Crellin Sent: 08 January 2009 16:29 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out OK, here's a teaser... All of our AD accounts are gradually being locked out. I have one guy searching for locked out accounts and unlocking them (and they do not get re-locked out) but with 2500 accounts this is more than a PITA. Now, this stinks of a brute force attack on an enumerated list of accounts on the network (we allow 10 attempts then lockout for 30mins), but we can't find _anything_ that looks like this. To compound matters, we have also had a small outbreak of WORM_DOWNAD.AD which has been contained and managed well, but I think this is a red herring as that worm's symptoms are nothing like what we are seeing (and there is no correlation). Does anyone know of a way to find out what processes are attempting to make a logon attempt (we have about 10 DCs spread about the place) to an account - bearing in mind it could be any one of 2500 accounts? Also, is it possible to find out where the logon attempt that caused an account lock came from? Cheers, and TIA, Andy. Andy Crellin Technical Services Manager Leonard Cheshire Disability Telephone: 01904 479200 Email: andy.crel...@lcdisability.org Change the way you see disability. Find out more at www.CreatureDiscomforts.org http://www.creaturediscomforts.org/ Our London Marathon places are almost sold out! Call 020 3242 0376 now to reserve one of the last few places available, or e-mail eve...@lcdisability.org Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete it immediately. Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England Wales) and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 66 South Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1RL. Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete it immediately. Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England Wales) and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 66 South Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1RL. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Online Mail Test
Hey, Yeah I meant use telnet to connect to port 25 and manually send an email as I would normally. I just have a routing/firewall issue preventing me from doing this easily currently. So let's say my mail server, @companyX.com is set to block incoming mail from any recipient with a local domain, such as companyX.com since that scenario could never occur in reality unless a forged sender was used, I want to test this, it appears to be not working... Anyone got a shell I can use :) jlc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 9:47 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Online Mail Test On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: I am in a situation where any external access I have to remote systems under my control have port 25 outbound blocked by their isp. I need to do some mail testing where I telnet in and set my from email, compose a message and By telnet in do you mean using Telnet-the-protocol as the remote access protocol to access those remote systems, or using TELNET.EXE to establish a raw TCP connection to an SMTP listener? I'll assume the later, as Telnet-the-protocol is increasingly rare these days. If my guess is wrong, say so. So my next question is: What mail scenario are you trying to test? Are you checking whether an SMTP server at the remote site can receive mail? If so, use your remote access method to get to a system at the remote site, then open your raw TCP connection from there. Are you checking whether mail sent from that site can make it out in general? If so, most ISPs will provide an SMTP relay server. So do TELNET smtp-relay-server.example.net 25 or whatever and relay through that. If ISP requires a password, I can explain how you formulate the required LOGIN string (it's not too hard, and useful to know these days). If you're desiring to probe third-party SMTP servers directly, while physically visiting the remote site, do you have a remote access solution (e.g., VPN, RDP) that will let you connect to a site with a less-bad ISP and test that way? Might be better that way. Web-based interfaces have their own set of issues, the biggest described below. If none of the above apply, describe the scenario better. :) deliver it in to the mail server. Anyone know of an online mail tester that allows you to specifically set the From address and push out a test email? Gmail will let you set your From address, but only after verifying that you can read mail sent to that address (by emailing it a verification code you have to enter back in to the Gmail web UI). I'm guessing you probably won't be able to find a long-lived, usable, completely unrestricted, general-purpose, third-party, web-based mail sending service. They're too tempting a target for spammer abuse. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Upgrading DCs to 64 bit
Thanks all. I wasn't aware of the GPMC issues - to clarify - you just have to run GPMC on a 32 bit server, right? (so we can still run it on our existing admin terminal server as we do now). -Brian From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 9:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Upgrading DCs to 64 bit We have two 64-bit 2003 DCs alongside our 32-bit DCs that have been humming along happily for at least a year now. No WS08 DCs installed yet, but we just extended our schema for WS08 over the winter break and that went well-still ticking along. We've also had to keep a 32-bit DC for GPMC, but I'm hoping when we get to WS08 I can get rid of that. BTW, just to clarify, AFAIK, there is no direct upgrade path at the server level-the DCs I installed as x64 had to be rebuilt. -Bonnie From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 7:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Upgrading DCs to 64 bit I have been running a mix of 32 and 64-bit DCs for over a year with no ill effects at all. I prefer the performance gains I receive from running 64-bit, but not all MS management tools (GPMC in particular) would run on 64-bit prior to Server 2008's release, so I had to keep at least 1 32-bit server around for that purpose. TVK From: Webb, Brian (Corp) [mailto:brian.w...@teldta.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 9:37 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Upgrading DCs to 64 bit Has anyone upgraded their 2003 domain from 32 bit DCs to 64 bit DCs? Our security team wants to move to 64 bit to take advantage of the larger event logs - anyone done it? Were there any issues running some DCs 32 bit and some 64 bit? Anyone run a mixed environment long term? I'm planning on doing some testing, but wanted some advance scouting if available. Brian Webb - MCSE TDS Corporate IS, Windows Server Platform Team Senior Systems Administrator When stuck on a problem as often can be, try to remember G.B.T.T.D. (Go Back To The Definition). - Dave Seybold ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out
Here's some old ASP script I wrote years ago to help me with a DoS lockout issue I was having. Sub Global_Unlock 'This sub was built to undo a DOS account lockout flood that I encountered on a production server. 'Because Account Lockout policies were in place and over 1500 users in AD tree I needed a quick 'way to unlock everyone once I resolved the DOS Flood. There is no visible link to this Sub 'but it can still be called by calling display_usergroup.asp?action=globalunlock response.write Unlocking... response.flush Set BaseObj = GetObject(WinNT:// Application(domain) / Application(Server)) % table width=100% name=rsTable id=rsTable cols=6 TR THAcronym title=Sort by Username onClick=table_sort(0) onMouseOver=this.style.cursor='hand';nbsp;UserNamenbsp;/acronym /TH THAcronym title=Sort by Full Name onClick=table_sort(1) onMouseOver=this.style.cursor='hand';nbsp;Full Namenbsp;/acronym/TH THAcronym title=Sort by Description onClick=table_sort(2) onMouseOver=this.style.cursor='hand';nbsp;Descriptionnbsp;/acron ym/TH THAcronym title=Sort by Active onClick=table_sort(3) onMouseOver=this.style.cursor='hand';nbsp;Activenbsp;/acronym/ TH THAcronym title=Sort by Locked onClick=table_sort(4) onMouseOver=this.style.cursor='hand';nbsp;Lockednbsp;/acronym/ TH THManage/TH /TR % BaseObj.Filter = Array(User) For Each user in BaseObj Set objUser = GetObject(WinNT:// Application(domain) / Application(Server) / user.name ,user) memstatus = font color='#00FF00'Enabled/font If objUser.AccountDisabled = TRUE Then memstatus = font color='#FF'Disabled/font acclockout = font color='#00FF00'Unlocked/font If Len(Request.QueryString(rev)) Then If objUser.isaccountlocked = False and user.name administrator Then objUser.IsAccountLocked = True objUser.Setinfo End If Else If objUser.isaccountlocked = True Then objUser.IsAccountLocked = False objUser.Setinfo End If End If If objUser.isaccountlocked = True Then acclockout = font color='#FF'Locked/font Response.write TR Response.write TD user.name /td Response.write TD objUser.FullName /td Response.write TD objUser.Description /td Response.write TD memstatus /td Response.write TD acclockout /td Response.write TDa href=manage_user.asp?user= user.name Manage/a/td Response.write /tr Response.Flush Next response.write /table End Sub Thanks, Jake Gardner TTC Network Administrator Ext. 246 From: Andy Crellin [mailto:andy.crel...@lcdisability.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out OK, here's a teaser... All of our AD accounts are gradually being locked out. I have one guy searching for locked out accounts and unlocking them (and they do not get re-locked out) but with 2500 accounts this is more than a PITA. Now, this stinks of a brute force attack on an enumerated list of accounts on the network (we allow 10 attempts then lockout for 30mins), but we can't find _anything_ that looks like this. To compound matters, we have also had a small outbreak of WORM_DOWNAD.AD which has been contained and managed well, but I think this is a red herring as that worm's symptoms are nothing like what we are seeing (and there is no correlation). Does anyone know of a way to find out what processes are attempting to make a logon attempt (we have about 10 DCs spread about the place) to an account - bearing in mind it could be any one of 2500 accounts? Also, is it possible to find out where the logon attempt that caused an account lock came from? Cheers, and TIA, Andy. Andy Crellin Technical Services Manager Leonard Cheshire Disability Telephone: 01904 479200 Email: andy.crel...@lcdisability.org Change the way you see disability. Find out more at www.CreatureDiscomforts.org http://www.creaturediscomforts.org/ Our London Marathon places are almost sold out! Call 020 3242 0376 now to reserve one of the last few places available, or e-mail eve...@lcdisability.org Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete it immediately. Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England Wales) and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 66 South Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1RL. ***Teletronics Technology Corporation*** This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you may not disclose, copy, distribute, or use this
RE: Online Mail Test
Nah, but funny as it has an invalid helo on the inbound test:) jlc From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:00 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Online Mail Test Does this help? https://www.testexchangeconnectivity.com/ From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Online Mail Test I am in a situation where any external access I have to remote systems under my control have port 25 outbound blocked by their isp. I need to do some mail testing where I telnet in and set my from email, compose a message and deliver it in to the mail server. Anyone know of an online mail tester that allows you to specifically set the From address and push out a test email? Thanks! jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out
http://news.zdnet.com/2424-9595_22-257980.html?tag=nl.e539 John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us From: Andy Crellin [mailto:andy.crel...@lcdisability.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out OK, here's a teaser... All of our AD accounts are gradually being locked out. I have one guy searching for locked out accounts and unlocking them (and they do not get re-locked out) but with 2500 accounts this is more than a PITA. Now, this stinks of a brute force attack on an enumerated list of accounts on the network (we allow 10 attempts then lockout for 30mins), but we can't find _anything_ that looks like this. To compound matters, we have also had a small outbreak of WORM_DOWNAD.AD which has been contained and managed well, but I think this is a red herring as that worm's symptoms are nothing like what we are seeing (and there is no correlation). Does anyone know of a way to find out what processes are attempting to make a logon attempt (we have about 10 DCs spread about the place) to an account - bearing in mind it could be any one of 2500 accounts? Also, is it possible to find out where the logon attempt that caused an account lock came from? Cheers, and TIA, Andy. Andy Crellin Technical Services Manager Leonard Cheshire Disability Telephone: 01904 479200 Email: andy.crel...@lcdisability.org Change the way you see disability. Find out more at www.CreatureDiscomforts.orghttp://www.creaturediscomforts.org/ Our London Marathon places are almost sold out! Call 020 3242 0376 now to reserve one of the last few places available, or e-mail eve...@lcdisability.orgmailto:eve...@lcdisability.org Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete it immediately. Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England Wales) and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 66 South Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1RL. This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
DumpSEC-ish tool
I need to dump security permissions for hundreds of folders. I have DumpSEC, but what I would like is something that shows me permissions differences from the directory directly above it, and if there is no difference (i.e, inheritance with no modifications) then show nothing, or no difference. DumpSEC can show me changes from the root, but if a folder 3 levels down has the same perms as 2 levels down, but 2 levels down is different than the root, DumpSEC shows me the full perm set for both folder 3 and folder 2. Example \Root : Permission set A \Root\RootPlus1 : list of permissions because they don't match Permission set A \Root\RootPlus1\Plus2 : Blank because the perms are same as \Root\RootPlus1 Currently, for \Root\RootPlus1\Plus2 DumpSEC lists all permissions because they don't match Permission set A, I'm just looking for the delta points from each other, not necessarily each folder different than the root folder. I hope that makes sense... David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out
I'm curious to see if that's what happened to Andy. My patch reporting actually shows 100% of my 300 systems as patched for that one :) David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 9:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out http://news.zdnet.com/2424-9595_22-257980.html?tag=nl.e539 John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us From: Andy Crellin [mailto:andy.crel...@lcdisability.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out OK, here's a teaser... All of our AD accounts are gradually being locked out. I have one guy searching for locked out accounts and unlocking them (and they do not get re-locked out) but with 2500 accounts this is more than a PITA. Now, this stinks of a brute force attack on an enumerated list of accounts on the network (we allow 10 attempts then lockout for 30mins), but we can't find _anything_ that looks like this. To compound matters, we have also had a small outbreak of WORM_DOWNAD.AD which has been contained and managed well, but I think this is a red herring as that worm's symptoms are nothing like what we are seeing (and there is no correlation). Does anyone know of a way to find out what processes are attempting to make a logon attempt (we have about 10 DCs spread about the place) to an account - bearing in mind it could be any one of 2500 accounts? Also, is it possible to find out where the logon attempt that caused an account lock came from? Cheers, and TIA, Andy. Andy Crellin Technical Services Manager Leonard Cheshire Disability Telephone: 01904 479200 Email: andy.crel...@lcdisability.org Change the way you see disability. Find out more at www.CreatureDiscomforts.orghttp://www.creaturediscomforts.org/ Our London Marathon places are almost sold out! Call 020 3242 0376 now to reserve one of the last few places available, or e-mail eve...@lcdisability.orgmailto:eve...@lcdisability.org Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete it immediately. Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England Wales) and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 66 South Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1RL. This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Upgrading DCs to 64 bit
It has to run on a 32-bit server, or client. I run it on my Vista workstation most of the time, since it adds additional capabilities, but I do like to have it loaded locally on at least one DC also, more a comfort thing than a requirement though. TVK From: Webb, Brian (Corp) [mailto:brian.w...@teldta.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:02 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Upgrading DCs to 64 bit Thanks all. I wasn't aware of the GPMC issues - to clarify - you just have to run GPMC on a 32 bit server, right? (so we can still run it on our existing admin terminal server as we do now). -Brian From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 9:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Upgrading DCs to 64 bit We have two 64-bit 2003 DCs alongside our 32-bit DCs that have been humming along happily for at least a year now. No WS08 DCs installed yet, but we just extended our schema for WS08 over the winter break and that went well-still ticking along. We've also had to keep a 32-bit DC for GPMC, but I'm hoping when we get to WS08 I can get rid of that. BTW, just to clarify, AFAIK, there is no direct upgrade path at the server level-the DCs I installed as x64 had to be rebuilt. -Bonnie From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 7:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Upgrading DCs to 64 bit I have been running a mix of 32 and 64-bit DCs for over a year with no ill effects at all. I prefer the performance gains I receive from running 64-bit, but not all MS management tools (GPMC in particular) would run on 64-bit prior to Server 2008's release, so I had to keep at least 1 32-bit server around for that purpose. TVK From: Webb, Brian (Corp) [mailto:brian.w...@teldta.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 9:37 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Upgrading DCs to 64 bit Has anyone upgraded their 2003 domain from 32 bit DCs to 64 bit DCs? Our security team wants to move to 64 bit to take advantage of the larger event logs - anyone done it? Were there any issues running some DCs 32 bit and some 64 bit? Anyone run a mixed environment long term? I'm planning on doing some testing, but wanted some advance scouting if available. Brian Webb - MCSE TDS Corporate IS, Windows Server Platform Team Senior Systems Administrator When stuck on a problem as often can be, try to remember G.B.T.T.D. (Go Back To The Definition). - Dave Seybold ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Yeah, then good luck activating it. I'd rather have a legit copy. Eh, well, I guess I'll be up for a better part of the night then. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 cbo...@vector-co.com You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:02 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Jon D rekcahp...@gmail.com wrote: There's only 2.5 million downloads allowed is the only reason I'm asking. I'm sure it will be reposted on the usual third-party sites approximately 42 seconds after release. :) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: File names that are too long - Can they be stopped?
I'd write a script that would periodically find these files, and automatically send an annoying email to rename it. -- ME2 On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Eric Wittersheim eric.wittersh...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the feedback Ben. On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Eric Wittersheim eric.wittersh...@gmail.com wrote: Is there anyway to enforce a limit (Windows Server 2000 and 2003) on the length of file names? Not that I know of. If you find one, let me know, 'cause I got the same problem in different ways. Part of the problem is that not all parts of Windows have the same path/file name length limits. Reportedly NTFS itself and the innards of the NT kernel can handle names on the order of thousands of characters long, but that's mainly academic because the higher-level stuff falls apart much earlier. The Win32 subsystem (which practically everything uses) is limited to 255 characters, I believe. Vital system components -- like Windows Explorer and the shell libraries -- seem to have even shorter limits. One of my favorites is users creating files in their local profile that work just fine, but then the roaming profile sync code pukes trying to sync back to the server. (Though I haven't seen that in a while; it may have been fixed in XP SP2.) Another part of the problem is that path name lengths can vary depending on how the system is seeing a file. For example, if I have C:\Company\Shared\Quality\Public\QMSDocs on the server shared as QMSDocs, and the workstations map that share as drive Q:, and then there's Q:\some\really\absurdly\ridiculously\ludicrously\long\path\name\to\a\file.doc, then it may be okay for the mapped path on the workstation, but on the server it will be C:\Company\Shared\Quality\Public\QMSDocs\some\really\absurdly\ridiculously\ludicrously\long\path\name\to\a\file.doc which pushes Explorer over the limit. Result? You can access the files from Explorer on a workstation, but not Explorer on the server. The filesystems typically used on CDs and DVDs have their own limits which are different from all of the above. So one thing that may help the CD archive scenario is to put all the files into an archive format which handles really long file names, like 7-Zip's .7z format. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
You can run it for 30 days without activation... or a product key. Christopher J. Bosak wrote: Yeah, then good luck activating it. I'd rather have a legit copy. Eh, well, I guess I'll be up for a better part of the night then. -- Phil Brutsche p...@optimumdata.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
oh dear! Then how-ever will I frustrate myself with an unfinished beta product!? -- ME2 On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Christopher J. Bosak cbo...@vector-co.com wrote: Actually, they are only letting 2.5 million downloads for this. Once it's gone, it's gone. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 cbo...@vector-co.com You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 09:03 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Jon D rekcahp...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone have any inside info? Are we talking 12:01am tomorrow, or more like 4:00pm in the afternoon? Everybody lied, it'll be available the day after tomorrow. (In other words: Sheesh, does it matter that much? If you're that worried about the precise minute of release, wait another day and the question is moot. :) ) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Christopher J. Bosak cbo...@vector-co.com wrote: Yeah, then good luck activating it. I'd rather have a legit copy. Assuming it's an unmodified copy, then the bits are the same; as far as the computer is concerned, it's as legit as one from Microsoft's servers. It's only illegitimate from standpoint of copyright law, which the computer knows not of. As far as activation goes, you don't need to activate right away. And I wouldn't even be surprised if Microsoft doesn't actually cap the license activations by count (it would be messy due to leaks like this). -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Slmgr.vbs -rearm I think you get at least 120 days. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now My understanding is that they keys given out via MSDN are good for 10 activations. Dunno about TechNet. And yes, you have a 30 day grace period before a product key - or activation - is absolutely required... Ben Scott wrote: As far as activation goes, you don't need to activate right away. And I wouldn't even be surprised if Microsoft doesn't actually cap the license activations by count (it would be messy due to leaks like this). -- Phil Brutsche p...@optimumdata.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Well I downloaded this morning, and installed it on an older Dell Precision. Works like a champ so far. I notice that recommended system specs are actually decreased for this version...which must be a first. On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Michael Hoffman m...@drumbrae.net wrote: Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman Drum Brae Solutions Ltd ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Decreased compared to which OS? _ From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Well I downloaded this morning, and installed it on an older Dell Precision. Works like a champ so far. I notice that recommended system specs are actually decreased for this version...which must be a first. On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Michael Hoffman m...@drumbrae.net wrote: Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman Drum Brae Solutions Ltd No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1877 - Release Date: 1/8/2009 8:13 AM ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Vista... On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Gary Whitten li...@undiscoveredworlds.comwrote: Decreased compared to which OS? -- *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:40 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Well I downloaded this morning, and installed it on an older Dell Precision. Works like a champ so far. I notice that recommended system specs are actually decreased for this version...which must be a first. On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Michael Hoffman m...@drumbrae.net wrote: Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman Drum Brae Solutions Ltd No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1877 - Release Date: 1/8/2009 8:13 AM ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
My understanding is that they keys given out via MSDN are good for 10 activations. Dunno about TechNet. And yes, you have a 30 day grace period before a product key - or activation - is absolutely required... Ben Scott wrote: As far as activation goes, you don't need to activate right away. And I wouldn't even be surprised if Microsoft doesn't actually cap the license activations by count (it would be messy due to leaks like this). -- Phil Brutsche p...@optimumdata.com ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Win2003 DNS DNS CName issue
Existing CNames in my dns work, but when I add a new one I get this w/ nslookup: existing Server: localhost Address: 127.0.0.1 Name:foo.domain.local Address: 192.168.0.15 Aliases: existing.domain.local bar Server: localhost Address: 127.0.0.1 Name:bar.domain.local Anyone know WTH is going on? Thanks! jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Found Windows 7 loads on ESX like a champ. Has any one experienced issue's trying to load either the x32 or x64 version of Windows 7 on VMware Workstation 6.0.4. So far both disk's error out at the same point for me on different systems. Thank you, Fred Sawyer Sunbelt Software From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:55 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Vista... On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Gary Whitten li...@undiscoveredworlds.commailto:li...@undiscoveredworlds.com wrote: Decreased compared to which OS? From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.commailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Well I downloaded this morning, and installed it on an older Dell Precision. Works like a champ so far. I notice that recommended system specs are actually decreased for this version...which must be a first. On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Michael Hoffman m...@drumbrae.netmailto:m...@drumbrae.net wrote: Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman Drum Brae Solutions Ltd No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1877 - Release Date: 1/8/2009 8:13 AM ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
I've got it on an older ThinkPad that wasn't even designed for Vista, much less Win7. So far so good. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Well I downloaded this morning, and installed it on an older Dell Precision. Works like a champ so far. I notice that recommended system specs are actually decreased for this version...which must be a first. On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Michael Hoffman m...@drumbrae.netmailto:m...@drumbrae.net wrote: Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman Drum Brae Solutions Ltd ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
From what I've heard, Win7 isn't too frustrating--so I'm willing to give it a look. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now oh dear! Then how-ever will I frustrate myself with an unfinished beta product!? -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
So, is it available or not and what is the url? MMF -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now From what I've heard, Win7 isn't too frustrating--so I'm willing to give it a look. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now oh dear! Then how-ever will I frustrate myself with an unfinished beta product!? -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Since the other beta's are out... I really like the new task bar. I'm not sold on the new Start button. Otherwise - it's very much like Vista sp2. Except that it uses less memory. At idle, my Vista system uses about 850 MB. At idle (pretty much the same startup applications), Win7 uses 500 MB. Speed-wise - I don't detect any appreciable difference. But I've got pretty fast machines already. I have found a couple of pretty obvious bugs, so I don't consider it production-ready. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now From what I've heard, Win7 isn't too frustrating--so I'm willing to give it a look. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now oh dear! Then how-ever will I frustrate myself with an unfinished beta product!? -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
It's on Technet, MSDN, and Connect. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now So, is it available or not and what is the url? MMF -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now From what I've heard, Win7 isn't too frustrating--so I'm willing to give it a look. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now oh dear! Then how-ever will I frustrate myself with an unfinished beta product!? -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
WPAD Proxy Config
Anyone here doing wpad in their org for configuring a proxy for borwsers? jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Win2003 DNS DNS CName issue
Sounds like you have dns suffixes set in your NIC properties. See if this command fixes it in nslookup Set srchlist= That should eliminate adding on the suffixes. -troy -Original Message- From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 12:06 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Win2003 DNS DNS CName issue Existing CNames in my dns work, but when I add a new one I get this w/ nslookup: existing Server: localhost Address: 127.0.0.1 Name:foo.domain.local Address: 192.168.0.15 Aliases: existing.domain.local bar Server: localhost Address: 127.0.0.1 Name:bar.domain.local Anyone know WTH is going on? Thanks! jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Win2003 DNS DNS CName issue
Cripe sakes, I just recreated it and it worked? I did delete and recreate it the first time with no luck... Gotta love it... jlc -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Win2003 DNS DNS CName issue Sounds like you have dns suffixes set in your NIC properties. See if this command fixes it in nslookup Set srchlist= That should eliminate adding on the suffixes. -troy -Original Message- From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 12:06 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Win2003 DNS DNS CName issue Existing CNames in my dns work, but when I add a new one I get this w/ nslookup: existing Server: localhost Address: 127.0.0.1 Name:foo.domain.local Address: 192.168.0.15 Aliases: existing.domain.local bar Server: localhost Address: 127.0.0.1 Name:bar.domain.local Anyone know WTH is going on? Thanks! jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Which one are you all downloading? The Checked Build or Beta? Thomas -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:36 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now It's on Technet, MSDN, and Connect. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now So, is it available or not and what is the url? MMF -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now From what I've heard, Win7 isn't too frustrating--so I'm willing to give it a look. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now oh dear! Then how-ever will I frustrate myself with an unfinished beta product!? -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Unless you know how to use a debugger, then the checked build does you no good whatsoever (or if you are going to submit dumps to MSFT). Just do the beta build. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 4:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Which one are you all downloading? The Checked Build or Beta? Thomas -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:36 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now It's on Technet, MSDN, and Connect. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now So, is it available or not and what is the url? MMF -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now From what I've heard, Win7 isn't too frustrating--so I'm willing to give it a look. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now oh dear! Then how-ever will I frustrate myself with an unfinished beta product!? -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Beta... On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Thomas Gonzalez tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org wrote: Which one are you all downloading? The Checked Build or Beta? Thomas -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:36 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now It's on Technet, MSDN, and Connect. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now So, is it available or not and what is the url? MMF -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now From what I've heard, Win7 isn't too frustrating--so I'm willing to give it a look. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now oh dear! Then how-ever will I frustrate myself with an unfinished beta product!? -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
From: Fred Sawyer [mailto:fr...@sunbelt-software.com] Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Found Windows 7 loads on ESX like a champ. Has any one experienced issue's trying to load either the x32 or x64 version of Windows 7 on VMware Workstation 6.0.4. So far both disk's error out at the same point for me on different systems. Workstation 6.5 is what supports Vista and Server 2008. I'm downloading both x86 and x64 now to load. Webster ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Thank you all. Thomas From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:22 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Beta... On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Thomas Gonzalez tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org wrote: Which one are you all downloading? The Checked Build or Beta? Thomas -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:36 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now It's on Technet, MSDN, and Connect. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now So, is it available or not and what is the url? MMF -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now From what I've heard, Win7 isn't too frustrating--so I'm willing to give it a look. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now oh dear! Then how-ever will I frustrate myself with an unfinished beta product!? -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Carl, What's up with your replies, they are rather hard to read? Is that an OL way of formatting a reply? Someone should shoot that dev at MS :) jlc From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now From: Fred Sawyer [mailto:fr...@sunbelt-software.com] Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Found Windows 7 loads on ESX like a champ. Has any one experienced issue's trying to load either the x32 or x64 version of Windows 7 on VMware Workstation 6.0.4. So far both disk's error out at the same point for me on different systems. Workstation 6.5 is what supports Vista and Server 2008. I'm downloading both x86 and x64 now to load. Webster ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: WPAD Proxy Config
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: Anyone here doing wpad in their org for configuring a proxy for borwsers? Yes. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: WPAD Proxy Config
Well, my firefox clients pick up the settings but not ie7. I am using the dns (cname) / dhcp option 252 method. How are you doing it, and do you have it working with ie7? Thanks! jlc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:38 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: WPAD Proxy Config On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: Anyone here doing wpad in their org for configuring a proxy for borwsers? Yes. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Win2003 DNS DNS CName issue
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: Cripe sakes, I just recreated it and it worked? I did delete and recreate it the first time with no luck... You may want to grab a copy of ISC BIND. ISC provides official Windows builds these days. The dig tool that comes with it is much more useful than NSLOOKUP. NSLOOKUP has always been a little flaky, frequently gives wrong/misleading/no diagnostics, doesn't use a consistent output format, doesn't provide all information by default, etc., etc. I'm wondering if the DNS answer actually had more information, but NSLOOKUP didn't give it for some reason. https://www.isc.org/ -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
I've tried several builds on a Dell Mini 9 netbook, and it's entirely usable. Even Aero works. Cheers Ken From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Friday, 9 January 2009 7:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now I've got it on an older ThinkPad that wasn't even designed for Vista, much less Win7. So far so good. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Well I downloaded this morning, and installed it on an older Dell Precision. Works like a champ so far. I notice that recommended system specs are actually decreased for this version...which must be a first. On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Michael Hoffman m...@drumbrae.netmailto:m...@drumbrae.net wrote: Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Win2003 DNS DNS CName issue
Should have thought of that :) I have many Linux servers here and use dig on them, I could have just checked that way, sigh... So there is an ISC Dig.exe for windows? Cool, I'll grab that for sure! Thanks for the tip! jlc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:11 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Win2003 DNS DNS CName issue On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: Cripe sakes, I just recreated it and it worked? I did delete and recreate it the first time with no luck... You may want to grab a copy of ISC BIND. ISC provides official Windows builds these days. The dig tool that comes with it is much more useful than NSLOOKUP. NSLOOKUP has always been a little flaky, frequently gives wrong/misleading/no diagnostics, doesn't use a consistent output format, doesn't provide all information by default, etc., etc. I'm wondering if the DNS answer actually had more information, but NSLOOKUP didn't give it for some reason. https://www.isc.org/ -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Ok, since we are on the subject... This has been irking me lately, I need to get it off my chest! I have been highly skeptical of all the rave reviews of 7 so far. There seems to be this wonderful wave of hope around 7 in the blogosphere, touting 7 is better than Vista. But Vista kinda of had terrible press, and everyone was convinced it was the next ME. In actually, it wasn't. Vista is great. It had it SP0 bumps for sure, but Vista in general was much better that I think the press made it out to be. Everyone is jumping in joy that 7 boots faster than Vista, more stable, etc, etc. Big Whoop. IMO, IT BETTER be faster and more stable! This is not a feature, this is a EXPECTATION. Better stability? Again, not a bonus feature, it's an expectation. New versions should NEVER be slower, especially with the crazy pace of hardware advancements. All in all, I think Vista's bad rep is just paving the way for good reviews of 7. It's like when Steve Jobs put the 'improved' Audio Jack in his slide show for the Gen 2 iPhone. No, Steve, you can't do that. You *^cked up with Gen1 with the audio port, and you fixed it in Gen2. You cannot market it as a new feature. The fact that he had to market that and throw it in his slid show, just goes to show that there weren't enough other new features introduced to talk about. I don't no much about 7, I haven't tried it, I'm sure I will download it on Friday, and buy a copy on release. I just hope MS knows what they are doing forcing an OS out the door so quickly. -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Since the other beta's are out... I really like the new task bar. I'm not sold on the new Start button. Otherwise - it's very much like Vista sp2. Except that it uses less memory. At idle, my Vista system uses about 850 MB. At idle (pretty much the same startup applications), Win7 uses 500 MB. Speed-wise - I don't detect any appreciable difference. But I've got pretty fast machines already. I have found a couple of pretty obvious bugs, so I don't consider it production-ready. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now From what I've heard, Win7 isn't too frustrating--so I'm willing to give it a look. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now oh dear! Then how-ever will I frustrate myself with an unfinished beta product!? -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
I like Vista. But there are some things that continue to irk me from a user perspective. Stuff like: a) explorer windows keep forgetting which columns they should be displaying for file properties b) booting is way to slow Both of the above two appear to be fixed in Win 7 betas. There is no way I could run Vista usably on a 1.6GHz netbook, but Win 7 works fine. That's good IMHO Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Sent: Friday, 9 January 2009 9:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Ok, since we are on the subject... This has been irking me lately, I need to get it off my chest! I have been highly skeptical of all the rave reviews of 7 so far. There seems to be this wonderful wave of hope around 7 in the blogosphere, touting 7 is better than Vista. But Vista kinda of had terrible press, and everyone was convinced it was the next ME. In actually, it wasn't. Vista is great. It had it SP0 bumps for sure, but Vista in general was much better that I think the press made it out to be. Everyone is jumping in joy that 7 boots faster than Vista, more stable, etc, etc. Big Whoop. IMO, IT BETTER be faster and more stable! This is not a feature, this is a EXPECTATION. Better stability? Again, not a bonus feature, it's an expectation. New versions should NEVER be slower, especially with the crazy pace of hardware advancements. All in all, I think Vista's bad rep is just paving the way for good reviews of 7. It's like when Steve Jobs put the 'improved' Audio Jack in his slide show for the Gen 2 iPhone. No, Steve, you can't do that. You *^cked up with Gen1 with the audio port, and you fixed it in Gen2. You cannot market it as a new feature. The fact that he had to market that and throw it in his slid show, just goes to show that there weren't enough other new features introduced to talk about. I don't no much about 7, I haven't tried it, I'm sure I will download it on Friday, and buy a copy on release. I just hope MS knows what they are doing forcing an OS out the door so quickly. -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Since the other beta's are out... I really like the new task bar. I'm not sold on the new Start button. Otherwise - it's very much like Vista sp2. Except that it uses less memory. At idle, my Vista system uses about 850 MB. At idle (pretty much the same startup applications), Win7 uses 500 MB. Speed-wise - I don't detect any appreciable difference. But I've got pretty fast machines already. I have found a couple of pretty obvious bugs, so I don't consider it production-ready. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now From what I've heard, Win7 isn't too frustrating--so I'm willing to give it a look. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now oh dear! Then how-ever will I frustrate myself with an unfinished beta product!? -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Trust me, I like Vista too. A lot. How is the folder browsing on 7? (non network) Like opening a folder with 100 or so pictures? That was the main slow down I noticed on Vista compared to XP. Take forever now... Might have to actually use a photo manager to manage my My Pictures folder. As for a), thought I was the only one. I always find myself adding the 'Modified Date' back to the column list! And I really don't care who the Composer and what Genre my word docs are in :) Ha! B) Vista boots my laptop much faster than XP ever did. Desktop... Not so sure. Slower hardware. -Original Message- From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 4:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now I like Vista. But there are some things that continue to irk me from a user perspective. Stuff like: a) explorer windows keep forgetting which columns they should be displaying for file properties b) booting is way to slow Both of the above two appear to be fixed in Win 7 betas. There is no way I could run Vista usably on a 1.6GHz netbook, but Win 7 works fine. That's good IMHO Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Sent: Friday, 9 January 2009 9:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Ok, since we are on the subject... This has been irking me lately, I need to get it off my chest! I have been highly skeptical of all the rave reviews of 7 so far. There seems to be this wonderful wave of hope around 7 in the blogosphere, touting 7 is better than Vista. But Vista kinda of had terrible press, and everyone was convinced it was the next ME. In actually, it wasn't. Vista is great. It had it SP0 bumps for sure, but Vista in general was much better that I think the press made it out to be. Everyone is jumping in joy that 7 boots faster than Vista, more stable, etc, etc. Big Whoop. IMO, IT BETTER be faster and more stable! This is not a feature, this is a EXPECTATION. Better stability? Again, not a bonus feature, it's an expectation. New versions should NEVER be slower, especially with the crazy pace of hardware advancements. All in all, I think Vista's bad rep is just paving the way for good reviews of 7. It's like when Steve Jobs put the 'improved' Audio Jack in his slide show for the Gen 2 iPhone. No, Steve, you can't do that. You *^cked up with Gen1 with the audio port, and you fixed it in Gen2. You cannot market it as a new feature. The fact that he had to market that and throw it in his slid show, just goes to show that there weren't enough other new features introduced to talk about. I don't no much about 7, I haven't tried it, I'm sure I will download it on Friday, and buy a copy on release. I just hope MS knows what they are doing forcing an OS out the door so quickly. -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Since the other beta's are out... I really like the new task bar. I'm not sold on the new Start button. Otherwise - it's very much like Vista sp2. Except that it uses less memory. At idle, my Vista system uses about 850 MB. At idle (pretty much the same startup applications), Win7 uses 500 MB. Speed-wise - I don't detect any appreciable difference. But I've got pretty fast machines already. I have found a couple of pretty obvious bugs, so I don't consider it production-ready. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now From what I've heard, Win7 isn't too frustrating--so I'm willing to give it a look. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now oh dear! Then how-ever will I frustrate myself with an unfinished beta product!? -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/
Re: WPAD Proxy Config
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: Well, my firefox clients pick up the settings but not ie7. I am using the dns (cname) / dhcp option 252 method. How are you doing it, and do you have it working with ie7? We haven't deployed MSIE 7 here yet. I'll see if I can get a sandbox VM running with it to test. MSIE 6 and Firefox 3.x on Win XP Pro SP2 both work fine. Here's what we did: We implemented the DNS method of WPAD. We didn't even bother with DHCP; the DNS method has worked fine for us for everything. I seem to recall reading that the DHCP method isn't as widely implemented in clients, but I could be wrong on that. We created a CNAME record named wpad.corp.example.com., where corp.example.com. is our Active Directory domain name, and the default DNS suffix for our LAN. Thus, clients attempting to do WPAD via DNS end up requesting http://wpad.corp.example.com/wpad.dat. The right-hand-side of the CNAME record specifies foo.corp.example.com., where foo is our proxy server. Our proxy server also runs an Apache web server, which is configured with an alias such that /wpad.dat redirects to /proxy.pac. That's our proxy auto-config script. Apache also knows that a *.pac file is of MIME type application/x-ns-proxy-autoconfig. To do that, the following was added to the Apache config file: AddType application/x-ns-proxy-autoconfig .pac Redirect /wpad.dat http://foo/proxy.pac Our proxy auto-config script looks like this: function FindProxyForURL(url, host) { if (isPlainHostName(host) || dnsDomainIs(host, .corp.example.com) || shExpMatch(url, http://10.*;) || shExpMatch(url, http://127.*;) ) return DIRECT; else return PROXY proxy:8080; } We also have a CNAME proxy.corp.example.com. that yields our proxy server. (I'm big on using generic aliases for specific hosts, so when things change you don't have to reconfigure a bunch of things, just the alias.) The script causes browsers to bypass our proxy for internal systems, and use our proxy for everything else. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Apparently not as I just logged in to my Technet plus account and no download available. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of NTSysAdmin Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now It is available now on MSDN Technet. It is available to the public 12:00am your time Friday. S -Original Message- From: Jon D [mailto:rekcahp...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:25 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Anyone have any inside info? Are we talking 12:01am tomorrow, or more like 4:00pm in the afternoon? On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Christopher J. Bosak cbo...@vector-co.com wrote: Public beta tomorrow. I'll have to wait as I don't have MSDN. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 cbo...@vector-co.com You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:m...@drumbrae.net] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 08:17 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman Drum Brae Solutions Ltd ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
That's why I asked. I guess I'll try tomorrow! MMF -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 4:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Apparently not as I just logged in to my Technet plus account and no download available. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of NTSysAdmin Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now It is available now on MSDN Technet. It is available to the public 12:00am your time Friday. S -Original Message- From: Jon D [mailto:rekcahp...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:25 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Anyone have any inside info? Are we talking 12:01am tomorrow, or more like 4:00pm in the afternoon? On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Christopher J. Bosak cbo...@vector-co.com wrote: Public beta tomorrow. I'll have to wait as I don't have MSDN. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 cbo...@vector-co.com You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:m...@drumbrae.net] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 08:17 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman Drum Brae Solutions Ltd ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
I used technet plus this morning...works fine... On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:37 PM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote: Apparently not as I just logged in to my Technet plus account and no download available. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
I just checked, it's there, downloading now SJ -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: January-08-09 5:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now That's why I asked. I guess I'll try tomorrow! MMF -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 4:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Apparently not as I just logged in to my Technet plus account and no download available. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of NTSysAdmin Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now It is available now on MSDN Technet. It is available to the public 12:00am your time Friday. S -Original Message- From: Jon D [mailto:rekcahp...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:25 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Anyone have any inside info? Are we talking 12:01am tomorrow, or more like 4:00pm in the afternoon? On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Christopher J. Bosak cbo...@vector-co.com wrote: Public beta tomorrow. I'll have to wait as I don't have MSDN. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 cbo...@vector-co.com You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:m...@drumbrae.net] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 08:17 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman Drum Brae Solutions Ltd ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Faster than Vista or XP? On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Martin Blackstone mblackst...@gmail.comwrote: Indeed. I personally don't think there is much of anything GREAT about Vista. But I don't think it's bad either. To me it's just not that much bang for the buck as far as upgrade costs go. Performance really isn't anything to write home about. I would take a new PC with it on there today. I wouldn't really be willing to spend any money to upgrade anything with it though. I've always found the whole thing to be very eh, I can take it or leave it. Which to me isn't good enough for upgrading. I've been playing with 7 a little bit and the first thing I noticed was the performance. I'm stoked. -Original Message- From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now I like Vista. But there are some things that continue to irk me from a user perspective. Stuff like: a) explorer windows keep forgetting which columns they should be displaying for file properties b) booting is way to slow Both of the above two appear to be fixed in Win 7 betas. There is no way I could run Vista usably on a 1.6GHz netbook, but Win 7 works fine. That's good IMHO Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Sent: Friday, 9 January 2009 9:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Ok, since we are on the subject... This has been irking me lately, I need to get it off my chest! I have been highly skeptical of all the rave reviews of 7 so far. There seems to be this wonderful wave of hope around 7 in the blogosphere, touting 7 is better than Vista. But Vista kinda of had terrible press, and everyone was convinced it was the next ME. In actually, it wasn't. Vista is great. It had it SP0 bumps for sure, but Vista in general was much better that I think the press made it out to be. Everyone is jumping in joy that 7 boots faster than Vista, more stable, etc, etc. Big Whoop. IMO, IT BETTER be faster and more stable! This is not a feature, this is a EXPECTATION. Better stability? Again, not a bonus feature, it's an expectation. New versions should NEVER be slower, especially with the crazy pace of hardware advancements. All in all, I think Vista's bad rep is just paving the way for good reviews of 7. It's like when Steve Jobs put the 'improved' Audio Jack in his slide show for the Gen 2 iPhone. No, Steve, you can't do that. You *^cked up with Gen1 with the audio port, and you fixed it in Gen2. You cannot market it as a new feature. The fact that he had to market that and throw it in his slid show, just goes to show that there weren't enough other new features introduced to talk about. I don't no much about 7, I haven't tried it, I'm sure I will download it on Friday, and buy a copy on release. I just hope MS knows what they are doing forcing an OS out the door so quickly. -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Since the other beta's are out... I really like the new task bar. I'm not sold on the new Start button. Otherwise - it's very much like Vista sp2. Except that it uses less memory. At idle, my Vista system uses about 850 MB. At idle (pretty much the same startup applications), Win7 uses 500 MB. Speed-wise - I don't detect any appreciable difference. But I've got pretty fast machines already. I have found a couple of pretty obvious bugs, so I don't consider it production-ready. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now From what I've heard, Win7 isn't too frustrating--so I'm willing to give it a look. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now oh dear! Then how-ever will I frustrate myself with an unfinished beta product!? -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a
RE: WPAD Proxy Config
Ok, Theoretically I have covered both since my dns has the cname wpad redirecting to my webserver which dishes out wpad.dat from its root and my dhcp server has option 252 referencing that complete url.:) My wpad file looks similar to yours as well. I see some issues searching the net on ie7 though, I just found that the GPO setting for it is rather flaky, sigh... Thanks! jlc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: WPAD Proxy Config On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: Well, my firefox clients pick up the settings but not ie7. I am using the dns (cname) / dhcp option 252 method. How are you doing it, and do you have it working with ie7? We haven't deployed MSIE 7 here yet. I'll see if I can get a sandbox VM running with it to test. MSIE 6 and Firefox 3.x on Win XP Pro SP2 both work fine. Here's what we did: We implemented the DNS method of WPAD. We didn't even bother with DHCP; the DNS method has worked fine for us for everything. I seem to recall reading that the DHCP method isn't as widely implemented in clients, but I could be wrong on that. We created a CNAME record named wpad.corp.example.com., where corp.example.com. is our Active Directory domain name, and the default DNS suffix for our LAN. Thus, clients attempting to do WPAD via DNS end up requesting http://wpad.corp.example.com/wpad.dat. The right-hand-side of the CNAME record specifies foo.corp.example.com., where foo is our proxy server. Our proxy server also runs an Apache web server, which is configured with an alias such that /wpad.dat redirects to /proxy.pac. That's our proxy auto-config script. Apache also knows that a *.pac file is of MIME type application/x-ns-proxy-autoconfig. To do that, the following was added to the Apache config file: AddType application/x-ns-proxy-autoconfig .pac Redirect /wpad.dat http://foo/proxy.pac Our proxy auto-config script looks like this: function FindProxyForURL(url, host) { if (isPlainHostName(host) || dnsDomainIs(host, .corp.example.com) || shExpMatch(url, http://10.*;) || shExpMatch(url, http://127.*;) ) return DIRECT; else return PROXY proxy:8080; } We also have a CNAME proxy.corp.example.com. that yields our proxy server. (I'm big on using generic aliases for specific hosts, so when things change you don't have to reconfigure a bunch of things, just the alias.) The script causes browsers to bypass our proxy for internal systems, and use our proxy for everything else. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Key not available yet, asks to check back in a few days. SJ -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:sj...@amico.com] Sent: January-08-09 5:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now I just checked, it's there, downloading now SJ -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: January-08-09 5:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now That's why I asked. I guess I'll try tomorrow! MMF -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 4:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Apparently not as I just logged in to my Technet plus account and no download available. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of NTSysAdmin Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now It is available now on MSDN Technet. It is available to the public 12:00am your time Friday. S -Original Message- From: Jon D [mailto:rekcahp...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:25 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Anyone have any inside info? Are we talking 12:01am tomorrow, or more like 4:00pm in the afternoon? On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Christopher J. Bosak cbo...@vector-co.com wrote: Public beta tomorrow. I'll have to wait as I don't have MSDN. Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 cbo...@vector-co.com You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:m...@drumbrae.net] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 08:17 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Enjoy Mike Mike Hoffman Drum Brae Solutions Ltd ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
Right now I'm comparing to Vista. Vista takes about 55 seconds to boot. W7 about 41. That's from power on to logon screen. From: Lee Douglas [mailto:lee.doug...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:50 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Faster than Vista or XP? On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Martin Blackstone mblackst...@gmail.com wrote: Indeed. I personally don't think there is much of anything GREAT about Vista. But I don't think it's bad either. To me it's just not that much bang for the buck as far as upgrade costs go. Performance really isn't anything to write home about. I would take a new PC with it on there today. I wouldn't really be willing to spend any money to upgrade anything with it though. I've always found the whole thing to be very eh, I can take it or leave it. Which to me isn't good enough for upgrading. I've been playing with 7 a little bit and the first thing I noticed was the performance. I'm stoked. -Original Message- From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now I like Vista. But there are some things that continue to irk me from a user perspective. Stuff like: a) explorer windows keep forgetting which columns they should be displaying for file properties b) booting is way to slow Both of the above two appear to be fixed in Win 7 betas. There is no way I could run Vista usably on a 1.6GHz netbook, but Win 7 works fine. That's good IMHO Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Sent: Friday, 9 January 2009 9:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Ok, since we are on the subject... This has been irking me lately, I need to get it off my chest! I have been highly skeptical of all the rave reviews of 7 so far. There seems to be this wonderful wave of hope around 7 in the blogosphere, touting 7 is better than Vista. But Vista kinda of had terrible press, and everyone was convinced it was the next ME. In actually, it wasn't. Vista is great. It had it SP0 bumps for sure, but Vista in general was much better that I think the press made it out to be. Everyone is jumping in joy that 7 boots faster than Vista, more stable, etc, etc. Big Whoop. IMO, IT BETTER be faster and more stable! This is not a feature, this is a EXPECTATION. Better stability? Again, not a bonus feature, it's an expectation. New versions should NEVER be slower, especially with the crazy pace of hardware advancements. All in all, I think Vista's bad rep is just paving the way for good reviews of 7. It's like when Steve Jobs put the 'improved' Audio Jack in his slide show for the Gen 2 iPhone. No, Steve, you can't do that. You *^cked up with Gen1 with the audio port, and you fixed it in Gen2. You cannot market it as a new feature. The fact that he had to market that and throw it in his slid show, just goes to show that there weren't enough other new features introduced to talk about. I don't no much about 7, I haven't tried it, I'm sure I will download it on Friday, and buy a copy on release. I just hope MS knows what they are doing forcing an OS out the door so quickly. -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Since the other beta's are out... I really like the new task bar. I'm not sold on the new Start button. Otherwise - it's very much like Vista sp2. Except that it uses less memory. At idle, my Vista system uses about 850 MB. At idle (pretty much the same startup applications), Win7 uses 500 MB. Speed-wise - I don't detect any appreciable difference. But I've got pretty fast machines already. I have found a couple of pretty obvious bugs, so I don't consider it production-ready. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now From what I've heard, Win7 isn't too frustrating--so I'm willing to give it a look. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now oh dear! Then how-ever will I frustrate myself with an unfinished beta product!? -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
RE: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
a) explorer windows keep forgetting which columns they should be displaying for file properties THANK YOU!!! This gives me the.. grrr -Original Message- From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Sent: Friday, 9 January 2009 9:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now I like Vista. But there are some things that continue to irk me from a user perspective. Stuff like: a) explorer windows keep forgetting which columns they should be displaying for file properties b) booting is way to slow Both of the above two appear to be fixed in Win 7 betas. There is no way I could run Vista usably on a 1.6GHz netbook, but Win 7 works fine. That's good IMHO Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Sent: Friday, 9 January 2009 9:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Ok, since we are on the subject... This has been irking me lately, I need to get it off my chest! I have been highly skeptical of all the rave reviews of 7 so far. There seems to be this wonderful wave of hope around 7 in the blogosphere, touting 7 is better than Vista. But Vista kinda of had terrible press, and everyone was convinced it was the next ME. In actually, it wasn't. Vista is great. It had it SP0 bumps for sure, but Vista in general was much better that I think the press made it out to be. Everyone is jumping in joy that 7 boots faster than Vista, more stable, etc, etc. Big Whoop. IMO, IT BETTER be faster and more stable! This is not a feature, this is a EXPECTATION. Better stability? Again, not a bonus feature, it's an expectation. New versions should NEVER be slower, especially with the crazy pace of hardware advancements. All in all, I think Vista's bad rep is just paving the way for good reviews of 7. It's like when Steve Jobs put the 'improved' Audio Jack in his slide show for the Gen 2 iPhone. No, Steve, you can't do that. You *^cked up with Gen1 with the audio port, and you fixed it in Gen2. You cannot market it as a new feature. The fact that he had to market that and throw it in his slid show, just goes to show that there weren't enough other new features introduced to talk about. I don't no much about 7, I haven't tried it, I'm sure I will download it on Friday, and buy a copy on release. I just hope MS knows what they are doing forcing an OS out the door so quickly. -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Since the other beta's are out... I really like the new task bar. I'm not sold on the new Start button. Otherwise - it's very much like Vista sp2. Except that it uses less memory. At idle, my Vista system uses about 850 MB. At idle (pretty much the same startup applications), Win7 uses 500 MB. Speed-wise - I don't detect any appreciable difference. But I've got pretty fast machines already. I have found a couple of pretty obvious bugs, so I don't consider it production-ready. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now From what I've heard, Win7 isn't too frustrating--so I'm willing to give it a look. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 On TechNet Now oh dear! Then how-ever will I frustrate myself with an unfinished beta product!? -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now
+1 on the Vista comments. I have it on my main machine at home and I don't mind it, but it's not worth it to upgrade any XP systems to Vista. For what I do (95% business stuff) it's XP with another interface and a million additional pieces to manage via GPO. And cuss because a file search seems to give inconsistent results, but that's probably because I haven't RTFM'd for Vista yet. David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:36 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Indeed. I personally don't think there is much of anything GREAT about Vista. But I don't think it's bad either. To me it's just not that much bang for the buck as far as upgrade costs go. Performance really isn't anything to write home about. I would take a new PC with it on there today. I wouldn't really be willing to spend any money to upgrade anything with it though. I've always found the whole thing to be very eh, I can take it or leave it. Which to me isn't good enough for upgrading. I've been playing with 7 a little bit and the first thing I noticed was the performance. I'm stoked. -Original Message- From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now I like Vista. But there are some things that continue to irk me from a user perspective. Stuff like: a) explorer windows keep forgetting which columns they should be displaying for file properties b) booting is way to slow Both of the above two appear to be fixed in Win 7 betas. There is no way I could run Vista usably on a 1.6GHz netbook, but Win 7 works fine. That's good IMHO Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Sent: Friday, 9 January 2009 9:19 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Gone way OT: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Ok, since we are on the subject... This has been irking me lately, I need to get it off my chest! I have been highly skeptical of all the rave reviews of 7 so far. There seems to be this wonderful wave of hope around 7 in the blogosphere, touting 7 is better than Vista. But Vista kinda of had terrible press, and everyone was convinced it was the next ME. In actually, it wasn't. Vista is great. It had it SP0 bumps for sure, but Vista in general was much better that I think the press made it out to be. Everyone is jumping in joy that 7 boots faster than Vista, more stable, etc, etc. Big Whoop. IMO, IT BETTER be faster and more stable! This is not a feature, this is a EXPECTATION. Better stability? Again, not a bonus feature, it's an expectation. New versions should NEVER be slower, especially with the crazy pace of hardware advancements. All in all, I think Vista's bad rep is just paving the way for good reviews of 7. It's like when Steve Jobs put the 'improved' Audio Jack in his slide show for the Gen 2 iPhone. No, Steve, you can't do that. You *^cked up with Gen1 with the audio port, and you fixed it in Gen2. You cannot market it as a new feature. The fact that he had to market that and throw it in his slid show, just goes to show that there weren't enough other new features introduced to talk about. I don't no much about 7, I haven't tried it, I'm sure I will download it on Friday, and buy a copy on release. I just hope MS knows what they are doing forcing an OS out the door so quickly. -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now Since the other beta's are out... I really like the new task bar. I'm not sold on the new Start button. Otherwise - it's very much like Vista sp2. Except that it uses less memory. At idle, my Vista system uses about 850 MB. At idle (pretty much the same startup applications), Win7 uses 500 MB. Speed-wise - I don't detect any appreciable difference. But I've got pretty fast machines already. I have found a couple of pretty obvious bugs, so I don't consider it production-ready. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 On TechNet Now From what I've heard, Win7 isn't too frustrating--so I'm willing to give it a look. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January
RE: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Andy: Until you can figure out what is going on this query for ADUC is easier than having someone search for locked out accounts... http://www.windowsnetworking.com/kbase/WindowsTips/Windows2003/AdminTip s/ActiveDirectory/FindAllLocked-OutAccounts.html http://www.windowsnetworking.com/kbase/WindowsTips/Windows2003/AdminTips /ActiveDirectory/FindAllLocked-OutAccounts.html As for determining the source of the lockout (someone sorta already mentioned this) http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc738772.aspx http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc738772.aspx Larry _ From: Andy Crellin [mailto:andy.crel...@lcdisability.org] Sent: 2009-01-08 11:29 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: All AD Accounts getting gradually locked out OK, here's a teaser... All of our AD accounts are gradually being locked out. I have one guy searching for locked out accounts and unlocking them (and they do not get re-locked out) but with 2500 accounts this is more than a PITA. Now, this stinks of a brute force attack on an enumerated list of accounts on the network (we allow 10 attempts then lockout for 30mins), but we can't find _anything_ that looks like this. To compound matters, we have also had a small outbreak of WORM_DOWNAD.AD which has been contained and managed well, but I think this is a red herring as that worm's symptoms are nothing like what we are seeing (and there is no correlation). Does anyone know of a way to find out what processes are attempting to make a logon attempt (we have about 10 DCs spread about the place) to an account - bearing in mind it could be any one of 2500 accounts? Also, is it possible to find out where the logon attempt that caused an account lock came from? Cheers, and TIA, Andy. Andy Crellin Technical Services Manager Leonard Cheshire Disability Telephone: 01904 479200 Email: andy.crel...@lcdisability.org Change the way you see disability. Find out more at www.CreatureDiscomforts.org http://www.creaturediscomforts.org/ Our London Marathon places are almost sold out! Call 020 3242 0376 now to reserve one of the last few places available, or e-mail eve...@lcdisability.org Internet communications are not secure and therefore Leonard Cheshire Disability does not accept any liability for the content of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Leonard Cheshire Disability. If you have received this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete it immediately. Leonard Cheshire Disability is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no: 552847, and a registered charity no: 218186 (England Wales) and no: SC005117 (Scotland) VAT no: 899 3223 75. Registered office: 66 South Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1RL. Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~