Re: ISA Server 2006 SP1

2008-05-27 Thread Clayton Doige
LOL, erm no, but I do use group policy to disable the user's ability to make
my life miserable...

2008/5/26 Greg Mulholland [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder. What's good for the goose is not
 good for the gander and such...

 We use it, we love it, do you run your workstations on a 'cut down' linux
 kernel as well?

 G

 -Original Message-
 From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, 27 May 2008 5:35 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

 I am not sure if ISA is the firewall of choice for a pure Microsoft
 environment Tom. There are plenty of other boxes I would trust more, maybe
 I
 am being old skool and need edukatin, but it's still a software firewall.
 Don't get me wrong, I use the product, but that's to secure things like
 Windows Mobile etc, and even then I plop in the DMZ behind another hardware
 box.

 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 26 May 2008 20:22
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

 I don't think that's fair.

 If you have an all UNIX or Linx environment, there are plenty of good
 firewalls out there.

 ISA is the firewall of choice only when you're running mostly Windows
 clients and servers. If you're running mostly *IX clients and servers,
 you might be happy with another firewall.

 HTH,
 Tom

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 10:50 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

 If it's not ISA, it's crap!


 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 8:23 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: FW: ISA Server 2006 SP1

 From another list

 http://blogs.technet.com/isablog/archive/2008/05/23/isa-server-2006-serv
 ice-
 pack-1-features.aspx




 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~




-- 
Regards,

Clayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://alsipius.com

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

2008-05-26 Thread NTSysAdmin
There is another type of firewall that doesn't use software?

:)

-Original Message-
From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 4:35 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

I am not sure if ISA is the firewall of choice for a pure Microsoft
environment Tom. There are plenty of other boxes I would trust more, maybe I
am being old skool and need edukatin, but it's still a software firewall.
Don't get me wrong, I use the product, but that's to secure things like
Windows Mobile etc, and even then I plop in the DMZ behind another hardware
box.

-Original Message-
From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 May 2008 20:22
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

I don't think that's fair.

If you have an all UNIX or Linx environment, there are plenty of good
firewalls out there.

ISA is the firewall of choice only when you're running mostly Windows
clients and servers. If you're running mostly *IX clients and servers,
you might be happy with another firewall.

HTH,
Tom

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 10:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

If it's not ISA, it's crap!


-Original Message-
From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 8:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: FW: ISA Server 2006 SP1

From another list

http://blogs.technet.com/isablog/archive/2008/05/23/isa-server-2006-serv
ice-
pack-1-features.aspx




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

2008-05-26 Thread Clayton Doige
I am not sure if ISA is the firewall of choice for a pure Microsoft
environment Tom. There are plenty of other boxes I would trust more, maybe I
am being old skool and need edukatin, but it's still a software firewall.
Don't get me wrong, I use the product, but that's to secure things like
Windows Mobile etc, and even then I plop in the DMZ behind another hardware
box.

-Original Message-
From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 26 May 2008 20:22
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

I don't think that's fair.

If you have an all UNIX or Linx environment, there are plenty of good
firewalls out there.

ISA is the firewall of choice only when you're running mostly Windows
clients and servers. If you're running mostly *IX clients and servers,
you might be happy with another firewall.

HTH,
Tom

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 10:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

If it's not ISA, it's crap!


-Original Message-
From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 8:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: FW: ISA Server 2006 SP1

From another list

http://blogs.technet.com/isablog/archive/2008/05/23/isa-server-2006-serv
ice-
pack-1-features.aspx




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

2008-05-26 Thread Clayton Doige
Lol :P you know what I mean, dedicated box, not one based on a standard
windows OS (yes I know loads of others use a linux kernel, but it's cut
down)

-Original Message-
From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NTSysAdmin
Sent: 26 May 2008 20:40
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

There is another type of firewall that doesn't use software?

:)

-Original Message-
From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 4:35 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

I am not sure if ISA is the firewall of choice for a pure Microsoft
environment Tom. There are plenty of other boxes I would trust more, maybe I
am being old skool and need edukatin, but it's still a software firewall.
Don't get me wrong, I use the product, but that's to secure things like
Windows Mobile etc, and even then I plop in the DMZ behind another hardware
box.

-Original Message-
From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 May 2008 20:22
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

I don't think that's fair.

If you have an all UNIX or Linx environment, there are plenty of good
firewalls out there.

ISA is the firewall of choice only when you're running mostly Windows
clients and servers. If you're running mostly *IX clients and servers,
you might be happy with another firewall.

HTH,
Tom

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 10:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

If it's not ISA, it's crap!


-Original Message-
From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 8:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: FW: ISA Server 2006 SP1

From another list

http://blogs.technet.com/isablog/archive/2008/05/23/isa-server-2006-serv
ice-
pack-1-features.aspx




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

2008-05-26 Thread Greg Mulholland
Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder. What's good for the goose is not good 
for the gander and such...

We use it, we love it, do you run your workstations on a 'cut down' linux 
kernel as well?

G

-Original Message-
From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 27 May 2008 5:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

I am not sure if ISA is the firewall of choice for a pure Microsoft
environment Tom. There are plenty of other boxes I would trust more, maybe I
am being old skool and need edukatin, but it's still a software firewall.
Don't get me wrong, I use the product, but that's to secure things like
Windows Mobile etc, and even then I plop in the DMZ behind another hardware
box.

-Original Message-
From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 May 2008 20:22
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

I don't think that's fair.

If you have an all UNIX or Linx environment, there are plenty of good
firewalls out there.

ISA is the firewall of choice only when you're running mostly Windows
clients and servers. If you're running mostly *IX clients and servers,
you might be happy with another firewall.

HTH,
Tom

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 10:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

If it's not ISA, it's crap!


-Original Message-
From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 8:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: FW: ISA Server 2006 SP1

From another list

http://blogs.technet.com/isablog/archive/2008/05/23/isa-server-2006-serv
ice-
pack-1-features.aspx




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

2008-05-26 Thread Ken Schaefer
I don't think this is really a valid argument anymore. There have been bugger 
all vulnerabilities in ISA Server. It installs its own hardened TCP/IP stack. 
And provided you have rock-solid drivers for whatever hardware you are using, 
then it's a stable system.

Cheers
Ken

 -Original Message-
 From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, 27 May 2008 6:00 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

 Lol :P you know what I mean, dedicated box, not one based on a standard
 windows OS (yes I know loads of others use a linux kernel, but it's cut
 down)

 -Original Message-
 From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NTSysAdmin
 Sent: 26 May 2008 20:40
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

 There is another type of firewall that doesn't use software?

 :)

 -Original Message-
 From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 4:35 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

 I am not sure if ISA is the firewall of choice for a pure Microsoft
 environment Tom. There are plenty of other boxes I would trust more,
 maybe I
 am being old skool and need edukatin, but it's still a software
 firewall.
 Don't get me wrong, I use the product, but that's to secure things like
 Windows Mobile etc, and even then I plop in the DMZ behind another
 hardware
 box.

 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 26 May 2008 20:22
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

 I don't think that's fair.

 If you have an all UNIX or Linx environment, there are plenty of good
 firewalls out there.

 ISA is the firewall of choice only when you're running mostly Windows
 clients and servers. If you're running mostly *IX clients and servers,
 you might be happy with another firewall.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

2008-05-26 Thread Webster
-1


Webster

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1
 
 If it's not ISA, it's crap!
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: FW: ISA Server 2006 SP1
 
 From another list
 
 http://blogs.technet.com/isablog/archive/2008/05/23/isa-server-2006-
 service-
 pack-1-features.aspx


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

2008-05-26 Thread NTSysAdmin
I wouldn't go that far, but I will say that there have been no documented 
vulnerabilities...:)

-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 9:51 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

I don't think this is really a valid argument anymore. There have been bugger 
all vulnerabilities in ISA Server. It installs its own hardened TCP/IP stack. 
And provided you have rock-solid drivers for whatever hardware you are using, 
then it's a stable system.

Cheers
Ken

 -Original Message-
 From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, 27 May 2008 6:00 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

 Lol :P you know what I mean, dedicated box, not one based on a standard
 windows OS (yes I know loads of others use a linux kernel, but it's cut
 down)

 -Original Message-
 From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NTSysAdmin
 Sent: 26 May 2008 20:40
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

 There is another type of firewall that doesn't use software?

 :)

 -Original Message-
 From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 4:35 PM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

 I am not sure if ISA is the firewall of choice for a pure Microsoft
 environment Tom. There are plenty of other boxes I would trust more,
 maybe I
 am being old skool and need edukatin, but it's still a software
 firewall.
 Don't get me wrong, I use the product, but that's to secure things like
 Windows Mobile etc, and even then I plop in the DMZ behind another
 hardware
 box.

 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 26 May 2008 20:22
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

 I don't think that's fair.

 If you have an all UNIX or Linx environment, there are plenty of good
 firewalls out there.

 ISA is the firewall of choice only when you're running mostly Windows
 clients and servers. If you're running mostly *IX clients and servers,
 you might be happy with another firewall.

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: ISA Server 2006 SP1

2008-05-25 Thread Martin Blackstone
If it's not ISA, it's crap!


-Original Message-
From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 8:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: FW: ISA Server 2006 SP1

From another list

http://blogs.technet.com/isablog/archive/2008/05/23/isa-server-2006-service-
pack-1-features.aspx




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~