RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
No, that would be Shookie didn’t release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out…jerk! (THAT’s added emphasis ☺ ) Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Is that “added emphasis”? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server…is a server… is a server Shook From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families From: David Lum To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment – do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
Refers to self in third person…”adds emphasis” to others… h… -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn’t release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out…jerk! (THAT’s added emphasis J ) Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Is that “added emphasis”? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server…is a server… is a server Shook From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families From: David Lum To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment – do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical
Just one question.please define OK? ;) On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah I used to be schizophrenic but we're OK now. Shook *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:06 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Refers to self in third person…adds emphasis to others… h… -sc *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:01 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn't release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out…jerk! (THAT's added emphasis J ) Shook *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Is that added emphasis? -sc *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server…is a server… is a server Shook *From:* John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families -- *From*: David Lum *To*: NT System Admin Issues *Sent*: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 *Subject*: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment – do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? *David Lum** **// *SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 *// *(Cell) 503.267.9764 -- CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
I think you missed it Sherry, there's even a shirt for Shook: http://www.zazzle.com/schizophrenic_shirt-235083872260949235 OK to Shook is not the same as it is to the rest of him. Dave From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Just one question.please define OK? ;) On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah I used to be schizophrenic but we're OK now. Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Refers to self in third person...adds emphasis to others... h... -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn't release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out...jerk! (THAT's added emphasis :) ) Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Is that added emphasis? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server...is a server... is a server Shook From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families From: David Lum To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment - do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical
Oh, I got it Dave, I'm just taking a shot at Shook. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:50 AM, David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you missed it Sherry, there's even a shirt for Shook: http://www.zazzle.com/schizophrenic_shirt-235083872260949235 OK to Shook is not the same as it is to the rest of him. Dave *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:24 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Just one question.please define OK? ;) On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah I used to be schizophrenic but we're OK now. Shook *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:06 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Refers to self in third person…adds emphasis to others… h… -sc *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:01 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn't release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out…jerk! (THAT's added emphasis J ) Shook *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Is that added emphasis? -sc *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server…is a server… is a server Shook *From:* John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families -- *From*: David Lum *To*: NT System Admin Issues *Sent*: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 *Subject*: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment – do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? *David Lum** **// *SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 *// *(Cell) 503.267.9764 -- CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
Sherry, I'm shot to the heart and you're to blame. You give love a bad name. Shook From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Oh, I got it Dave, I'm just taking a shot at Shook. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:50 AM, David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you missed it Sherry, there's even a shirt for Shook: http://www.zazzle.com/schizophrenic_shirt-235083872260949235 OK to Shook is not the same as it is to the rest of him. Dave From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Just one question.please define OK? ;) On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah I used to be schizophrenic but we're OK now. Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Refers to self in third person...adds emphasis to others... h... -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn't release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out...jerk! (THAT's added emphasis :) ) Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Is that added emphasis? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server...is a server... is a server Shook From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families From: David Lum To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment - do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
I'll be there for you; These five words I pledge to you. When you breath, I want to be the air for you. I'll be there for you. Shook From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical I play my part and you play your game... On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sherry, I'm shot to the heart and you're to blame. You give love a bad name. Shook From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Oh, I got it Dave, I'm just taking a shot at Shook. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:50 AM, David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you missed it Sherry, there's even a shirt for Shook: http://www.zazzle.com/schizophrenic_shirt-235083872260949235 OK to Shook is not the same as it is to the rest of him. Dave From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Just one question.please define OK? ;) On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah I used to be schizophrenic but we're OK now. Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Refers to self in third person...adds emphasis to others... h... -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn't release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out...jerk! (THAT's added emphasis :) ) Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Is that added emphasis? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server...is a server... is a server Shook From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families From: David Lum To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment - do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
These five words I SWEAR to you. Sorry. Had to fix it. _ From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical I'll be there for you; These five words I pledge to you. When you breath, I want to be the air for you. I'll be there for you. Shook From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical I play my part and you play your game... On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sherry, I'm shot to the heart and you're to blame. You give love a bad name. Shook From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Oh, I got it Dave, I'm just taking a shot at Shook. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:50 AM, David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you missed it Sherry, there's even a shirt for Shook: http://www.zazzle.com/schizophrenic_shirt-235083872260949235 http://www.zazzle.com/schizophrenic_shirt-235083872260949235 OK to Shook is not the same as it is to the rest of him. Dave From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Just one question.please define OK? ;) On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah I used to be schizophrenic but we're OK now. Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Refers to self in third person...adds emphasis to others... h... -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn't release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out...jerk! (THAT's added emphasis :-) ) Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Is that added emphasis? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server...is a server... is a server Shook From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families _ From: David Lum To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment - do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 _ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology
Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical
Cause you're wanteddead or alive. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These five words I SWEAR to you. Sorry. Had to fix it. -- *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:29 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical I'll be there for you; These five words I pledge to you. When you breath, I want to be the air for you. I'll be there for you. Shook *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:21 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical I play my part and you play your game... On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sherry, I'm shot to the heart and you're to blame. You give love a bad name. Shook *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:06 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Oh, I got it Dave, I'm just taking a shot at Shook. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:50 AM, David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you missed it Sherry, there's even a shirt for Shook: http://www.zazzle.com/schizophrenic_shirt-235083872260949235 OK to Shook is not the same as it is to the rest of him. Dave *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:24 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Just one question.please define OK? ;) On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah I used to be schizophrenic but we're OK now. Shook *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:06 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Refers to self in third person...adds emphasis to others... h... -sc *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:01 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn't release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out...jerk! (THAT's added emphasis J ) Shook *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Is that added emphasis? -sc *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server...is a server... is a server Shook *From:* John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families -- *From*: David Lum *To*: NT System Admin Issues *Sent*: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 *Subject*: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment - do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? *David Lum** **// *SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 *// *(Cell) 503.267.9764 -- CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally
Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical
I play my part and you play your game... On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sherry, I'm shot to the heart and you're to blame. You give love a bad name. Shook *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:06 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Oh, I got it Dave, I'm just taking a shot at Shook. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:50 AM, David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you missed it Sherry, there's even a shirt for Shook: http://www.zazzle.com/schizophrenic_shirt-235083872260949235 OK to Shook is not the same as it is to the rest of him. Dave *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:24 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Just one question.please define OK? ;) On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah I used to be schizophrenic but we're OK now. Shook *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:06 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Refers to self in third person…adds emphasis to others… h… -sc *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:01 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn't release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out…jerk! (THAT's added emphasis J ) Shook *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Is that added emphasis? -sc *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server…is a server… is a server Shook *From:* John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families -- *From*: David Lum *To*: NT System Admin Issues *Sent*: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 *Subject*: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment – do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? *David Lum** **// *SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 *// *(Cell) 503.267.9764 -- CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
All right, who put the Karaoke machine by the open bar again? Christopher J. Bosak Vector Company c. 847.603.4673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to install an RTFM Interface, due to an LBNC issue. - B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 09:29 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical I'll be there for you; These five words I pledge to you. When you breath, I want to be the air for you. I'll be there for you. Shook From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical I play my part and you play your game... On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sherry, I'm shot to the heart and you're to blame. You give love a bad name. Shook From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Oh, I got it Dave, I'm just taking a shot at Shook. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:50 AM, David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you missed it Sherry, there's even a shirt for Shook: http://www.zazzle.com/schizophrenic_shirt-235083872260949235 OK to Shook is not the same as it is to the rest of him. Dave From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Just one question.please define OK? ;) On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah I used to be schizophrenic but we're OK now. Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Refers to self in third person.adds emphasis to others. h. -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn't release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out.jerk! (THAT's added emphasis J ) Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Is that added emphasis? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server.is a server. is a server Shook From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families _ From: David Lum To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment - do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 _ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical
Looks like I'm headin' for a heartbreak sigh... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
/me having flashbacks of Donnie and Marie, Captain and Tennille, Sonny and Cher... From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical It's a heartache Nothing but a heartache Hits you when it's too late Hits you when your down. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like I'm headin' for a heartbreak sigh... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical
Hmmm, you're flashing back to the wrong decade I think...last time I checked those names were from the 70's, not the 80's On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Richards, Brian D [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: /me having flashbacks of Donnie and Marie, Captain and Tennille, Sonny and Cher... -- *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:42 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical It's a heartache Nothing but a heartache Hits you when it's too late Hits you when your down. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Looks like I'm headin' for a heartbreak sigh... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical
TVK not returning your calls? On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like I'm headin' for a heartbreak sigh... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- ME2 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
Yeah I used to be schizophrenic but we’re OK now. Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Refers to self in third person…”adds emphasis” to others… h… -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn’t release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out…jerk! (THAT’s added emphasis ☺ ) Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Is that “added emphasis”? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server…is a server… is a server Shook From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families From: David Lum To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment – do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
scratches head realizes that Shookie is a hunt-n-peck typist laughs head off moves on Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn’t release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out…jerk! (THAT’s added emphasis J ) Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Is that “added emphasis”? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server…is a server… is a server Shook From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families _ From: David Lum To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment – do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 _ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
I think you're livin' on a prayer, Shookster... From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 7:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Sherry, I'm shot to the heart and you're to blame. You give love a bad name. Shook From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Oh, I got it Dave, I'm just taking a shot at Shook. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:50 AM, David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you missed it Sherry, there's even a shirt for Shook: http://www.zazzle.com/schizophrenic_shirt-235083872260949235 OK to Shook is not the same as it is to the rest of him. Dave From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Just one question.please define OK? ;) On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah I used to be schizophrenic but we're OK now. Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Refers to self in third person...adds emphasis to others... h... -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn't release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out...jerk! (THAT's added emphasis :) ) Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Is that added emphasis? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server...is a server... is a server Shook From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families From: David Lum To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment - do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical
It's a heartache Nothing but a heartache Hits you when it's too late Hits you when your down. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like I'm headin' for a heartbreak sigh... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical
No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families From: David Lum To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment – do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
David: Our naming convention allows for us to differentiate between types of server, so yes, we do. XXX = Business Unit XX = Type of Device (WS, SV, RT, etc...) XX = Department (Two digit letter for department, TS = Technical Support, etc...) XX = Number within department (digit number 01, 02, 03, etc...) XXX = Identifier, if it's a virtual machine it would be VSX for Linux, VSW for Windows XX = Location (Two digit abbreviation for city where the device is located) HTH, Jim From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 08:20 To: ML: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment - do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
Asset tags or serial numbers. From: Axcess Internet (Listserv) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 10:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical David: Our naming convention allows for us to differentiate between types of server, so yes, we do. XXX = Business Unit XX = Type of Device (WS, SV, RT, etc...) XX = Department (Two digit letter for department, TS = Technical Support, etc...) XX = Number within department (digit number 01, 02, 03, etc...) XXX = Identifier, if it's a virtual machine it would be VSX for Linux, VSW for Windows XX = Location (Two digit abbreviation for city where the device is located) HTH, Jim From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 08:20 To: ML: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment - do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical
I tend not to make virtuals or physicals any different (after all they are invisible to end users and a lot of support teams) - but seeing as though all the physical servers we have run ESX anyway, the 'ESX' bit makes them pretty identifiable from all the others :-) 2008/10/13 David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment – do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? *David Lum** **// *SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 *// *(Cell) 503.267.9764 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +! A server...is a server... is a server Mostly, unless you're involved with asset tracking and warranties...and thanks for the answers. If you have 500 servers and are asked to list only the physical ones (for warranty and asset tracking), how do you guys handle that? AD dump with a compare of a VM list? Dave From: Stephan Barr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of lists Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:38 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Asset tags or serial numbers. From: Axcess Internet (Listserv) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 10:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical David: Our naming convention allows for us to differentiate between types of server, so yes, we do. XXX = Business Unit XX = Type of Device (WS, SV, RT, etc...) XX = Department (Two digit letter for department, TS = Technical Support, etc...) XX = Number within department (digit number 01, 02, 03, etc...) XXX = Identifier, if it's a virtual machine it would be VSX for Linux, VSW for Windows XX = Location (Two digit abbreviation for city where the device is located) HTH, Jim From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 08:20 To: ML: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment - do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
Internal Asset Tracking DB, very easy to pull a report filtered on type. Regards, Jim From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 08:53 To: ML: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +! A server...is a server... is a server Mostly, unless you're involved with asset tracking and warranties...and thanks for the answers. If you have 500 servers and are asked to list only the physical ones (for warranty and asset tracking), how do you guys handle that? AD dump with a compare of a VM list? Dave From: Stephan Barr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of lists Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:38 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Asset tags or serial numbers. From: Axcess Internet (Listserv) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 10:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical David: Our naming convention allows for us to differentiate between types of server, so yes, we do. XXX = Business Unit XX = Type of Device (WS, SV, RT, etc...) XX = Department (Two digit letter for department, TS = Technical Support, etc...) XX = Number within department (digit number 01, 02, 03, etc...) XXX = Identifier, if it's a virtual machine it would be VSX for Linux, VSW for Windows XX = Location (Two digit abbreviation for city where the device is located) HTH, Jim From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 08:20 To: ML: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment - do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
I know this isn't specific help - but there is a flag in either AD or in WMI that defines the server as being virtual. I'm in the throes of authoring or I'd go track it down for you - perhaps that'll give you the lead you need to find it on technet. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +! A server.is a server. is a server Mostly, unless you're involved with asset tracking and warranties.and thanks for the answers. If you have 500 servers and are asked to list only the physical ones (for warranty and asset tracking), how do you guys handle that? AD dump with a compare of a VM list? Dave From: Stephan Barr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of lists Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:38 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Asset tags or serial numbers. From: Axcess Internet (Listserv) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 10:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical David: Our naming convention allows for us to differentiate between types of server, so yes, we do. XXX = Business Unit XX = Type of Device (WS, SV, RT, etc.) XX = Department (Two digit letter for department, TS = Technical Support, etc.) XX = Number within department (digit number 01, 02, 03, etc.) XXX = Identifier, if it's a virtual machine it would be VSX for Linux, VSW for Windows XX = Location (Two digit abbreviation for city where the device is located) HTH, Jim From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 08:20 To: ML: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment - do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/tip/0,,sid94_gci1264524 ,00.html Although I just skimmed the article, part 3 goes into extending the schema and creating an attribute to ID the virtual machines. HTH, Don Guyer Systems Engineer Information Services Department Prudential Fox Roach/ Trident 431 W. Lancaster Avenue Devon, PA 19333 Ph: (610) 993-3299 Fax: (610) 650-5306 www.prufoxroach.com blocked::blocked::http://www.prufoxroach.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 1:26 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical I know this isn't specific help - but there is a flag in either AD or in WMI that defines the server as being virtual. I'm in the throes of authoring or I'd go track it down for you - perhaps that'll give you the lead you need to find it on technet... Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +! A server...is a server... is a server Mostly, unless you're involved with asset tracking and warranties...and thanks for the answers. If you have 500 servers and are asked to list only the physical ones (for warranty and asset tracking), how do you guys handle that? AD dump with a compare of a VM list? Dave From: Stephan Barr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of lists Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:38 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Asset tags or serial numbers. From: Axcess Internet (Listserv) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 10:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical David: Our naming convention allows for us to differentiate between types of server, so yes, we do. XXX = Business Unit XX = Type of Device (WS, SV, RT, etc...) XX = Department (Two digit letter for department, TS = Technical Support, etc...) XX = Number within department (digit number 01, 02, 03, etc...) XXX = Identifier, if it's a virtual machine it would be VSX for Linux, VSW for Windows XX = Location (Two digit abbreviation for city where the device is located) HTH, Jim From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 08:20 To: ML: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment - do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 /pre table width=100%trtd class=body This email and any files transmitted with it are confidentialbr and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity tobr whom they are addressed. It may contain information protected by br state and federal privacy and intellectual property laws.br If you have received this email in error pleasebr notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail frombr your system. If you are not the named addressee you shouldbr not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail, and you arebr notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking anybr action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.br /td/tr/table ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical
WMI will do it. This article will help (beware of line wrap): http://windowsitpro.com/article/articleid/97188/how-can-i-create-a-wmi-filter-for-only-certain-computer-makes.html Servers running on VMware will list the computer manufacturer as VMware, Inc.. David Lum wrote: Mostly, unless you’re involved with asset tracking and warranties…and thanks for the answers. If you have 500 servers and are asked to list only the physical ones (for warranty and asset tracking), how do you guys handle that? AD dump with a compare of a VM list? -- Phil Brutsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
Nice find Phil, I have never considered that VMware would be listed there. -Troy -Original Message- From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical WMI will do it. This article will help (beware of line wrap): http://windowsitpro.com/article/articleid/97188/how-can-i-create-a-wmi-filter-for-only-certain-computer-makes.html Servers running on VMware will list the computer manufacturer as VMware, Inc.. David Lum wrote: Mostly, unless you're involved with asset tracking and warranties...and thanks for the answers. If you have 500 servers and are asked to list only the physical ones (for warranty and asset tracking), how do you guys handle that? AD dump with a compare of a VM list? -- Phil Brutsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical
It's something I noticed with the VMware guests registered in WSUS ;) Troy Meyer wrote: Nice find Phil, I have never considered that VMware would be listed there. -- Phil Brutsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
No. Server name is based on unit/function. We didn't differentiate HP's from Dell's, so we don't differentiate physical from virtual. -sc From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment - do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
Is that “added emphasis”? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server…is a server… is a server Shook From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families From: David Lum To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment – do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical
same here From: Steven M. Caesare [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 14 October 2008 10:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No. Server name is based on unit/function. We didn’t differentiate HP’s from Dell’s, so we don’t differentiate physical from virtual. -sc From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment – do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
