Re: [nycwireless] New Yorker Article [was: Multichannel News -AnalystsQuestionBellInvestments]

2006-03-21 Thread Ruben Safir
Common carrier
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A common carrier is an organization that transports a product or service
using its facilities, or those of other carriers, and offers its
services to the general public.

Traditionally common carrier means a business that transports people or
physical goods. In the 20th century, the term came to refer also to
utilities (those transporting some service such as communications or
public utilities). The term differs from private carrier, which operates
solely for the benefit of one entity and does not offer services to the
general public



That should end the discussion on common carriers.  Any fair minded
individual can clearly understand that the sentence

Internet Service Providers generally wish to avoid being classified as
a common carrier and, so far, have managed to do so.

means that ISPs have managed enough political power to prevent their
rightful regularity definition as common carriers.  But that has nothing
to do with the clear fact that they are a common carrier, and if they
mess up network neutrality, they will be facing far more regulations to
protect the public from any gross violation of unfair business practice.

Ruben

On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 23:36 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Ruben Safir wrote:
 
 snip
  common carrier and, so far, have managed to do so. Before 1996, such
  classification could be helpful in defending a monopolistic position,
  but the main focus of policy has been on competition, so common
  carrier status has little value for ISPs, while carrying obligations
  they would rather avoid. The key FCC Order on this point is: IN RE
  FEDERAL-STATE JOINT BOARD ON UNIVERSAL SERVICE, 13 FCC Rcd. 11501
  (1998), which holds that ISP service (both retail and backbone) is an
  information service (not subject to common carrier obligations) rather
  than a telecommunications service (which might be classified as
  common carriage).
 So, which part of this is unclear to you, Ruben? ISPs are not common 
 carriers. Done and done. In the alternate reality, the one you wish you 
 lived in, they might be, but here on earth, we aren't. 
 
 That should end the discussion at least on this specific subject.
 
 --
 NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
 Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
 Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/

--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


Re: [nycwireless] New Yorker Article [was: Multichannel News -AnalystsQuestionBellInvestments]

2006-03-21 Thread Dylan Mcduffie

...This thread is growing old and is not worth the
amount of space it takes in my mailbox. 


--- Ruben Safir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 23:36 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  So, which part of this is unclear to you, Ruben?
 ISPs are not common 
  carriers. Done and done. In the alternate reality,
 the one you wish you 
  lived in, they might be, but here on earth, we
 aren't. 
  
 
 Why did you snip the part on the common definition
 of Common Carrier.
 
 Just because some business minded extremest like
 yourself have managed
 to so far keep ISP's exempt from regulatory
 constrainst of common
 carriers on the federal level (only on the federal
 level) in NO WAY
 changes the fact that ISP's are common carriers.
 
 And the government has, will, and will in the future
 regulate ISP's
 since they are OBVIOUSLY common carriers.
 
 Ruben
 
 --
 NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
 Un/Subscribe:

http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
 Archives:
 http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


Re: [nycwireless] New Yorker Article [was: Multichannel News -AnalystsQuestionBellInvestments]

2006-03-21 Thread Darrel O'Pry
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 08:50 -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
 Common carrier
 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Jump to: navigation, search
 A common carrier is an organization that transports a product or service
 using its facilities, or those of other carriers, and offers its
 services to the general public.
 
 Traditionally common carrier means a business that transports people or
 physical goods. In the 20th century, the term came to refer also to
 utilities (those transporting some service such as communications or
 public utilities). The term differs from private carrier, which operates
 solely for the benefit of one entity and does not offer services to the
 general public
 
 
 
 That should end the discussion on common carriers.  Any fair minded
 individual can clearly understand that the sentence
 
 Internet Service Providers generally wish to avoid being classified as
 a common carrier and, so far, have managed to do so.
 
 means that ISPs have managed enough political power to prevent their
 rightful regularity definition as common carriers.  But that has nothing
 to do with the clear fact that they are a common carrier, and if they
 mess up network neutrality, they will be facing far more regulations to
 protect the public from any gross violation of unfair business practice.
 
 Ruben


Ruben, 
  Wikipedia is not an authoritative reference. The FCC and the Federal
government make the rules.  An online, publicly editable application
does not make a strong supporting reference. While it can often provide
a good summary for people who won't take the time to hunt down the
original sources themselves. Its is still just job blow writing down his
interpretation.



--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


[nycwireless] User suspension from mailing list

2006-03-21 Thread Dana Spiegel
Rubin has been suspended from the list due to repeated inappropriate  
postings.


Dana Spiegel
Executive Director
NYCwireless
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.NYCwireless.net
+1 917 402 0422

Read the Wireless Community blog: http://www.wirelesscommunity.info


On Mar 21, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Dylan Mcduffie wrote:



...This thread is growing old and is not worth the
amount of space it takes in my mailbox.


--- Ruben Safir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 23:36 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:


So, which part of this is unclear to you, Ruben?

ISPs are not common

carriers. Done and done. In the alternate reality,

the one you wish you

lived in, they might be, but here on earth, we

aren't.




Why did you snip the part on the common definition
of Common Carrier.

Just because some business minded extremest like
yourself have managed
to so far keep ISP's exempt from regulatory
constrainst of common
carriers on the federal level (only on the federal
level) in NO WAY
changes the fact that ISP's are common carriers.

And the government has, will, and will in the future
regulate ISP's
since they are OBVIOUSLY common carriers.

Ruben

--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe:


http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/

Archives:
http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/




__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/ 
nycwireless/

Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/


Re: [nycwireless] New Yorker Article [was: Multichannel News -AnalystsQuestionBellInvestments]

2006-03-21 Thread Jim Henry
If Wikipedia is still editiable by anyone, then it's the LAST 
place I would look for a definition.



On Tue Mar 21 05:50:52 PST 2006, Ruben Safir [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Common carrier
 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Jump to: navigation, search
 A common carrier is an organization that transports a product or 
 service
 using its facilities, or those of other carriers, and offers its
 services to the general public.
 
snip
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/