Re: [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration
Good morning Yang, I have reviewed your Committer promotion requests for Integration ·Brian Freeman – Ok ·Mariusz Wagner – I am unsure – only 1 contribution to the Integration project over the last 90 days; 9 over the last 6 months. His contribution has drastically decreased. Are you sure he is still committed to contribute to the ONAP? Let’s review within the next 90 days. Best regards Catherine -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4649): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4649 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29747106/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration
Hi, Thanks for following up and clarifying Phil and Jim. BR, Steve From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of Jim Baker Sent: Wednesday 20 February 2019 19:51 To: Phil Robb Cc: onap-tsc ; Kenny Paul Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration Thanks Phil for re-energizing the discussion... I got focused on other tasks and failed to keep up my end of the conversation. Your summary is accurate - I'm investigating a method to change the workflow for committer changes that removes a bottleneck. Once I determine that the process is feasible, I'll take it to the TSC for review/approval. In the meantime, the process flow remains as documented with additions receiving existing committer approval and TSC notification prior to submission ti LFN-IT for implementation. Best regards, Jim On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 10:56 AM Phil Robb mailto:pr...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: Hi Steve: I think you and Jim are talking past each other a bit... I expect partly because Jim is new. As Steve notes in the community charter, the TSC has/had responsibility for final approval of all new-committer requests, and the PTLs are responsible for documenting a) the new committer's worthiness, and b) that existing committers approve of the promotion. The TSC has never been tasked with executing any of the mechanics of providing committer-rights or documentation of such rights anywhere. So Steve's original question was in regard to the TSC's delegation of that final approval to the Release Engineer, given that it had been given to Gildas, was everyone comfortable with giving that same responsibility to Jim. Note that the delegation is only for committer requests that have clear worthiness and voting documentation complete. If any questions or concerns arise in the Release Manager's review, the request goes to the TSC for a full review. Jim is talking about something different. Namely, that apparently Gildas maintained an INFO.yaml file in each of ONAP's ~150 repos with each committer's name/LFID, and Gildas also took on the responsibility of submitting the request to LF-IT to add the commit-rights for that/those repos to the newly promoted individual. Jim is noting that having one person (him) do that work is a bottleneck in the process and is costing him over 1 hour per day which is not a good use of his time. Instead, there is a new process whereby each P'TL takes on the responsibility of updating the INFO.yaml file for their project and submitting the request to LF-IT to have the commit-right added to the newly promoted individual. Steve's point of TSC delegation does indeed speed up the process for committer promotions. Jim's point of having one person do something that can easily be spread across project PTLs also speeds up the process and properly scales the work, removing a bottleneck. Best, Phil. On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 1:13 PM Stephen Terrill mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>> wrote: Hi Jim, I may have missed something here. The community charter states: 3.2.2.1 Adding Committers •Initial Committers for a project will be specified at project creation •Committer rights for a project are earned via contribution and community trust. Committers for a project select and vote for new Committers for that project, subject to TSC approval. •New Committers for a project should have a demonstrable established history of meritocratic contributions. The TSC delegated vetting the requests to the release manager. The PTLs cannot just modify these according to our current governance. BR, Steve. From: Jim Baker mailto:jba...@linuxfoundation.org>> Sent: Friday 15 February 2019 01:19 To: Stephen Terrill mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>> Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>; Kenny Paul mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>> Subject: Re: Committer promotion requests for Integration Delays these days are running in the weeks time frames as the PTLs haven't embraced the responsibility of modifying their own INFO.yaml files. These files are the user readable source of truth for the committers and rel_eng requests the gerritt merge be completed and the gerritt link to be produced to prove the LDAP that they control (the real SoT) is in alignment with the INFO.yaml. I'd LOVE to see the community take over this task as I really fail to see how LFN adds value here. Thoughts? Jim On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 5:06 PM Stephen Terrill mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>> wrote: Hi Jim, Thanks for the reply. I appreciate that you taking the role. Earlier the committer approval process was delegate to the release responsible and I don’t recall a decision to change this, though that can be re-evaluated and done. My view is that the value added is speed in the case of normal approval as a voting process takes time. BR, Steve From: Jim Baker mailto:jba...@linuxfoundation.org>> S
Re: [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration
the role. Earlier >> the committer approval process was delegate to the release responsible and >> I don’t recall a decision to change this, though that can be re-evaluated >> and done. My view is that the value added is speed in the case of normal >> approval as a voting process takes time. >> >> >> >> BR, >> >> >> >> Steve >> >> >> >> *From:* Jim Baker >> *Sent:* Thursday 14 February 2019 22:50 >> *To:* Stephen Terrill >> *Cc:* onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; Kenny Paul >> *Subject:* Re: Committer promotion requests for Integration >> >> >> >> Hey Steve, >> There was a TSC discussion about release manager and infrastructure >> manager roles - but apparently no vote on the matter as I found the issue >> still open: >> >> (TSC) Finalize discussions about the Infrastructure Role >> >> I have been acting as a proxy for the TSC in committer adds/deletes, repo >> creation (acting infrastructure manager), and coordinating other >> infrastructure topics. >> Today @TSCmeeting I announced that myself et.al. would be coming forward >> with a roadmap of LF infrastructure plans for the coming few months. >> >> In terms of the committer approval process did you want to propose a >> change? I'd love to hear your thoughts. >> I weigh all the tasks the LFN staff does with the simple "do we create >> value by performing this action"? >> Committer management needs a control point - but it's hard to say we >> create value by being that control point... >> What do you think? >> Jim >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:30 PM Stephen Terrill < >> stephen.terr...@ericsson.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I just wanted to check the process on this now. Originally for each the >> committer promotion and new repository requests, the TSC held a vote. Then >> this was streamlined we decided to have the release responsible, and if it >> was all OK (voted by PTLs, history of Metacritic contribution, a reasonable >> and small number of committers; then release manager OKd and the TSC was >> informed, otherwise it was raised to the TSC by the release manager for >> further discussion and final decision. We have had a change of guard but >> no decision to re-evaluate the process. I assume then that we continue to >> follow the same. With this email I wanted to check that we have a common >> assumption regarding this. >> >> >> >> BR, >> >> >> >> Steve >> >> >> >> *From:* onap-tsc@lists.onap.org *On Behalf Of *Yang >> Xu >> *Sent:* Tuesday 12 February 2019 06:48 >> *To:* onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; Jim Baker ; >> 'Kenny Paul' >> *Subject:* [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration >> >> >> >> Dear TSC, >> >> >> >> Integration team has voted to promote Brian Freeman (5/5 votes) and >> Mariusz Wagner(4/5 votes) to Integration committers. Please see their >> promotion requests here: >> >> >> >> *https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Brian+Freemam >> <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Brian+Freemam>* >> >> *https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Mariusz+Wagner >> <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Mariusz+Wagner>* >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> >> -Yang Xu >> >> Integration PTL >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jim Baker >> >> Linux Foundation Networking - Technical Program Manager >> >> mobile: +1 970 227 6007 >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jim Baker >> >> Linux Foundation Networking - Technical Program Manager >> >> mobile: +1 970 227 6007 >> >> >> > > -- > Phil Robb > VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation > (O) 970-229-5949 > (M) 970-420-4292 > Skype: Phil.Robb > -- Jim Baker Linux Foundation Networking - Technical Program Manager mobile: +1 970 227 6007 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4645): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4645 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29747106/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration
rd > with a roadmap of LF infrastructure plans for the coming few months. > > In terms of the committer approval process did you want to propose a > change? I'd love to hear your thoughts. > I weigh all the tasks the LFN staff does with the simple "do we create > value by performing this action"? > Committer management needs a control point - but it's hard to say we > create value by being that control point... > What do you think? > Jim > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:30 PM Stephen Terrill < > stephen.terr...@ericsson.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just wanted to check the process on this now. Originally for each the > committer promotion and new repository requests, the TSC held a vote. Then > this was streamlined we decided to have the release responsible, and if it > was all OK (voted by PTLs, history of Metacritic contribution, a reasonable > and small number of committers; then release manager OKd and the TSC was > informed, otherwise it was raised to the TSC by the release manager for > further discussion and final decision. We have had a change of guard but > no decision to re-evaluate the process. I assume then that we continue to > follow the same. With this email I wanted to check that we have a common > assumption regarding this. > > > > BR, > > > > Steve > > > > *From:* onap-tsc@lists.onap.org *On Behalf Of *Yang > Xu > *Sent:* Tuesday 12 February 2019 06:48 > *To:* onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; Jim Baker ; > 'Kenny Paul' > *Subject:* [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration > > > > Dear TSC, > > > > Integration team has voted to promote Brian Freeman (5/5 votes) and > Mariusz Wagner(4/5 votes) to Integration committers. Please see their > promotion requests here: > > > > *https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Brian+Freemam > <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Brian+Freemam>* > > *https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Mariusz+Wagner > <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Mariusz+Wagner>* > > > > Best regards, > > > > -Yang Xu > > Integration PTL > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jim Baker > > Linux Foundation Networking - Technical Program Manager > > mobile: +1 970 227 6007 > > > > > -- > > Jim Baker > > Linux Foundation Networking - Technical Program Manager > > mobile: +1 970 227 6007 > > > -- Phil Robb VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation (O) 970-229-5949 (M) 970-420-4292 Skype: Phil.Robb -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4644): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4644 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29747106/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration
Hi Jim, I may have missed something here. The community charter states: 3.2.2.1 Adding Committers •Initial Committers for a project will be specified at project creation •Committer rights for a project are earned via contribution and community trust. Committers for a project select and vote for new Committers for that project, subject to TSC approval. •New Committers for a project should have a demonstrable established history of meritocratic contributions. The TSC delegated vetting the requests to the release manager. The PTLs cannot just modify these according to our current governance. BR, Steve. From: Jim Baker Sent: Friday 15 February 2019 01:19 To: Stephen Terrill Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; Kenny Paul Subject: Re: Committer promotion requests for Integration Delays these days are running in the weeks time frames as the PTLs haven't embraced the responsibility of modifying their own INFO.yaml files. These files are the user readable source of truth for the committers and rel_eng requests the gerritt merge be completed and the gerritt link to be produced to prove the LDAP that they control (the real SoT) is in alignment with the INFO.yaml. I'd LOVE to see the community take over this task as I really fail to see how LFN adds value here. Thoughts? Jim On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 5:06 PM Stephen Terrill mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>> wrote: Hi Jim, Thanks for the reply. I appreciate that you taking the role. Earlier the committer approval process was delegate to the release responsible and I don’t recall a decision to change this, though that can be re-evaluated and done. My view is that the value added is speed in the case of normal approval as a voting process takes time. BR, Steve From: Jim Baker mailto:jba...@linuxfoundation.org>> Sent: Thursday 14 February 2019 22:50 To: Stephen Terrill mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>> Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>; Kenny Paul mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>> Subject: Re: Committer promotion requests for Integration Hey Steve, There was a TSC discussion about release manager and infrastructure manager roles - but apparently no vote on the matter as I found the issue still open: (TSC) Finalize discussions about the Infrastructure Role I have been acting as a proxy for the TSC in committer adds/deletes, repo creation (acting infrastructure manager), and coordinating other infrastructure topics. Today @TSCmeeting I announced that myself et.al<http://et.al>. would be coming forward with a roadmap of LF infrastructure plans for the coming few months. In terms of the committer approval process did you want to propose a change? I'd love to hear your thoughts. I weigh all the tasks the LFN staff does with the simple "do we create value by performing this action"? Committer management needs a control point - but it's hard to say we create value by being that control point... What do you think? Jim On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:30 PM Stephen Terrill mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>> wrote: Hi, I just wanted to check the process on this now. Originally for each the committer promotion and new repository requests, the TSC held a vote. Then this was streamlined we decided to have the release responsible, and if it was all OK (voted by PTLs, history of Metacritic contribution, a reasonable and small number of committers; then release manager OKd and the TSC was informed, otherwise it was raised to the TSC by the release manager for further discussion and final decision. We have had a change of guard but no decision to re-evaluate the process. I assume then that we continue to follow the same. With this email I wanted to check that we have a common assumption regarding this. BR, Steve From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of Yang Xu Sent: Tuesday 12 February 2019 06:48 To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>; Jim Baker mailto:jba...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 'Kenny Paul' mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>> Subject: [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration Dear TSC, Integration team has voted to promote Brian Freeman (5/5 votes) and Mariusz Wagner(4/5 votes) to Integration committers. Please see their promotion requests here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Brian+Freemam https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Mariusz+Wagner Best regards, -Yang Xu Integration PTL -- Jim Baker Linux Foundation Networking - Technical Program Manager mobile: +1 970 227 6007 -- Jim Baker Linux Foundation Networking - Technical Program Manager mobile: +1 970 227 6007 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4630): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/46
Re: [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration
Delays these days are running in the weeks time frames as the PTLs haven't embraced the responsibility of modifying their own INFO.yaml files. These files are the user readable source of truth for the committers and rel_eng requests the gerritt merge be completed and the gerritt link to be produced to prove the LDAP that they control (the real SoT) is in alignment with the INFO.yaml. I'd* LOVE *to see the community take over this task as I really fail to see how LFN adds value here. Thoughts? Jim On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 5:06 PM Stephen Terrill < stephen.terr...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > > > Thanks for the reply. I appreciate that you taking the role. Earlier the > committer approval process was delegate to the release responsible and I > don’t recall a decision to change this, though that can be re-evaluated and > done. My view is that the value added is speed in the case of normal > approval as a voting process takes time. > > > > BR, > > > > Steve > > > > *From:* Jim Baker > *Sent:* Thursday 14 February 2019 22:50 > *To:* Stephen Terrill > *Cc:* onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; Kenny Paul > *Subject:* Re: Committer promotion requests for Integration > > > > Hey Steve, > There was a TSC discussion about release manager and infrastructure > manager roles - but apparently no vote on the matter as I found the issue > still open: > > (TSC) Finalize discussions about the Infrastructure Role > > I have been acting as a proxy for the TSC in committer adds/deletes, repo > creation (acting infrastructure manager), and coordinating other > infrastructure topics. > Today @TSCmeeting I announced that myself et.al. would be coming forward > with a roadmap of LF infrastructure plans for the coming few months. > > In terms of the committer approval process did you want to propose a > change? I'd love to hear your thoughts. > I weigh all the tasks the LFN staff does with the simple "do we create > value by performing this action"? > Committer management needs a control point - but it's hard to say we > create value by being that control point... > What do you think? > Jim > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:30 PM Stephen Terrill < > stephen.terr...@ericsson.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just wanted to check the process on this now. Originally for each the > committer promotion and new repository requests, the TSC held a vote. Then > this was streamlined we decided to have the release responsible, and if it > was all OK (voted by PTLs, history of Metacritic contribution, a reasonable > and small number of committers; then release manager OKd and the TSC was > informed, otherwise it was raised to the TSC by the release manager for > further discussion and final decision. We have had a change of guard but > no decision to re-evaluate the process. I assume then that we continue to > follow the same. With this email I wanted to check that we have a common > assumption regarding this. > > > > BR, > > > > Steve > > > > *From:* onap-tsc@lists.onap.org *On Behalf Of *Yang > Xu > *Sent:* Tuesday 12 February 2019 06:48 > *To:* onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; Jim Baker ; > 'Kenny Paul' > *Subject:* [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration > > > > Dear TSC, > > > > Integration team has voted to promote Brian Freeman (5/5 votes) and > Mariusz Wagner(4/5 votes) to Integration committers. Please see their > promotion requests here: > > > > *https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Brian+Freemam > <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Brian+Freemam>* > > *https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Mariusz+Wagner > <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Mariusz+Wagner>* > > > > Best regards, > > > > -Yang Xu > > Integration PTL > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jim Baker > > Linux Foundation Networking - Technical Program Manager > > mobile: +1 970 227 6007 > -- Jim Baker Linux Foundation Networking - Technical Program Manager mobile: +1 970 227 6007 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4628): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4628 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29747106/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration
Hi Jim, Thanks for the reply. I appreciate that you taking the role. Earlier the committer approval process was delegate to the release responsible and I don’t recall a decision to change this, though that can be re-evaluated and done. My view is that the value added is speed in the case of normal approval as a voting process takes time. BR, Steve From: Jim Baker Sent: Thursday 14 February 2019 22:50 To: Stephen Terrill Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; Kenny Paul Subject: Re: Committer promotion requests for Integration Hey Steve, There was a TSC discussion about release manager and infrastructure manager roles - but apparently no vote on the matter as I found the issue still open: (TSC) Finalize discussions about the Infrastructure Role I have been acting as a proxy for the TSC in committer adds/deletes, repo creation (acting infrastructure manager), and coordinating other infrastructure topics. Today @TSCmeeting I announced that myself et.al<http://et.al>. would be coming forward with a roadmap of LF infrastructure plans for the coming few months. In terms of the committer approval process did you want to propose a change? I'd love to hear your thoughts. I weigh all the tasks the LFN staff does with the simple "do we create value by performing this action"? Committer management needs a control point - but it's hard to say we create value by being that control point... What do you think? Jim On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:30 PM Stephen Terrill mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>> wrote: Hi, I just wanted to check the process on this now. Originally for each the committer promotion and new repository requests, the TSC held a vote. Then this was streamlined we decided to have the release responsible, and if it was all OK (voted by PTLs, history of Metacritic contribution, a reasonable and small number of committers; then release manager OKd and the TSC was informed, otherwise it was raised to the TSC by the release manager for further discussion and final decision. We have had a change of guard but no decision to re-evaluate the process. I assume then that we continue to follow the same. With this email I wanted to check that we have a common assumption regarding this. BR, Steve From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of Yang Xu Sent: Tuesday 12 February 2019 06:48 To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>; Jim Baker mailto:jba...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 'Kenny Paul' mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>> Subject: [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration Dear TSC, Integration team has voted to promote Brian Freeman (5/5 votes) and Mariusz Wagner(4/5 votes) to Integration committers. Please see their promotion requests here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Brian+Freemam https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Mariusz+Wagner Best regards, -Yang Xu Integration PTL -- Jim Baker Linux Foundation Networking - Technical Program Manager mobile: +1 970 227 6007 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4627): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4627 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29747106/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration
Hey Steve, There was a TSC discussion about release manager and infrastructure manager roles - but apparently no vote on the matter as I found the issue still open: (TSC) Finalize discussions about the Infrastructure Role I have been acting as a proxy for the TSC in committer adds/deletes, repo creation (acting infrastructure manager), and coordinating other infrastructure topics. Today @TSCmeeting I announced that myself et.al. would be coming forward with a roadmap of LF infrastructure plans for the coming few months. In terms of the committer approval process did you want to propose a change? I'd love to hear your thoughts. I weigh all the tasks the LFN staff does with the simple "do we create value by performing this action"? Committer management needs a control point - but it's hard to say we create value by being that control point... What do you think? Jim On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:30 PM Stephen Terrill < stephen.terr...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I just wanted to check the process on this now. Originally for each the > committer promotion and new repository requests, the TSC held a vote. Then > this was streamlined we decided to have the release responsible, and if it > was all OK (voted by PTLs, history of Metacritic contribution, a reasonable > and small number of committers; then release manager OKd and the TSC was > informed, otherwise it was raised to the TSC by the release manager for > further discussion and final decision. We have had a change of guard but > no decision to re-evaluate the process. I assume then that we continue to > follow the same. With this email I wanted to check that we have a common > assumption regarding this. > > > > BR, > > > > Steve > > > > *From:* onap-tsc@lists.onap.org *On Behalf Of *Yang > Xu > *Sent:* Tuesday 12 February 2019 06:48 > *To:* onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; Jim Baker ; > 'Kenny Paul' > *Subject:* [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration > > > > Dear TSC, > > > > Integration team has voted to promote Brian Freeman (5/5 votes) and > Mariusz Wagner(4/5 votes) to Integration committers. Please see their > promotion requests here: > > > > *https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Brian+Freemam > <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Brian+Freemam>* > > *https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Mariusz+Wagner > <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Mariusz+Wagner>* > > > > Best regards, > > > > -Yang Xu > > Integration PTL > > > > > > > -- Jim Baker Linux Foundation Networking - Technical Program Manager mobile: +1 970 227 6007 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4625): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4625 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29747106/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration
Hi, I just wanted to check the process on this now. Originally for each the committer promotion and new repository requests, the TSC held a vote. Then this was streamlined we decided to have the release responsible, and if it was all OK (voted by PTLs, history of Metacritic contribution, a reasonable and small number of committers; then release manager OKd and the TSC was informed, otherwise it was raised to the TSC by the release manager for further discussion and final decision. We have had a change of guard but no decision to re-evaluate the process. I assume then that we continue to follow the same. With this email I wanted to check that we have a common assumption regarding this. BR, Steve From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of Yang Xu Sent: Tuesday 12 February 2019 06:48 To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; Jim Baker ; 'Kenny Paul' Subject: [onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration Dear TSC, Integration team has voted to promote Brian Freeman (5/5 votes) and Mariusz Wagner(4/5 votes) to Integration committers. Please see their promotion requests here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Brian+Freemam https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Mariusz+Wagner Best regards, -Yang Xu Integration PTL -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4623): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4623 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29747106/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[onap-tsc] Committer promotion requests for Integration
Dear TSC, Integration team has voted to promote Brian Freeman (5/5 votes) and Mariusz Wagner(4/5 votes) to Integration committers. Please see their promotion requests here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Brian+Freemam https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Committer+Promotion+Requests+for+Mariusz+Wagner Best regards, -Yang Xu Integration PTL -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4614): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4614 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29747106/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
