Re: [onap-tsc] Projects status on wiki.

2017-07-01 Thread Lingli Deng 
Chengli,

 

Thanks for the clarifications.

For others to track the progress and latest status, would you mind updating the 
original proposal wiki page for openlabs as a project 
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Open+Lab) to 

 

1, tag it as obsolete; and 

2, add a reference to point to the approved open labs subcommittee wiki page.

 

Thanks,

Lingli

 

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of Chengli Wang
Sent: 2017年7月2日 6:25
To: Stephen Terrill <stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>
Cc: onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Projects status on wiki.

 

Hi Stephen,

 

Open Lab was approved as a subcommittee. 

The page is under TSC with other subcommittees.


On 2 Jul 2017, at 1:38 AM, Stephen Terrill <stephen.terr...@ericsson.com 
<mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com> > wrote:

Hi All,

 

I was looking over the project (approved, proposed, etc) and had a few 
observations.

 

In the approved projects:

*   We have approved the openlab project 
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Open+Lab), but I couldn’t see that in the 
approved project list.

I assume that should be added (approved in the TSC on June 22)

 

In draft projects:

*   I believe Reference VNF project can be approved as it is part of 
integration now.  I assume it could be considered withdrawn???
*   ONAP operations manager/ONAP on containers is a project that lacks 
clarity to me.  It was proposed as a sub-project under ONAP OOM, however is it 
something that we should assume directly or need to discuss??
*   We need to discuss Common Frameworks, I believe from comments that it 
is considered withdrawn, however it would be good if the authors clarified that.
*   The application authorization framework is still there (and in the 
approved projects).  I assume its just part of the backlog to clean up as this 
was recent.

 

BR,

 

Steve

 

 

 

 

 <http://www.ericsson.com/> 




STEPHEN TERRILL 
Technology Specialist 
DUIC, Systems and Technology 
Development Unit IP & Cloud

Business Unit, IT & Cloud Products


Ericsson
Ericsson R Center, via de los Poblados 13
28033, Madrid, Spain
Phone +34 339 3005
Mobile +34 609 168 515
stephen.terr...@ericsson.com <mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com> 
www.ericsson.com <http://www.ericsson.com>  



 <http://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign> 

 

Legal entity: Ericsson España S.A, compay registration number ESA288568603. 
This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis 
of the terms set out at www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer 
<http://www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer>  

 

___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org <mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org> 
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] Projects status on wiki.

2017-07-01 Thread Lingli Deng 
Hi Alla,

 

Since all the sub-projects are either withdrawn or promoted to be stand-alone 
projects, could we suggest that we tag the original proposal at 
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6589597 for Common 
Frameworks as obsolete and add references to approved projects to clarify the 
status for others to track?

 

Thanks,

Lingli

 

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of Alla Goldner
Sent: 2017年7月2日 1:50
To: Stephen Terrill <stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>; onap-tsc 
<onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Projects status on wiki.

 

Hi Steve, all,

 

Common Frameworks status: it is clarified under the project definition 
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6589597 that:

 

The project will include the following infrastructure:

1.
<https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3247130=contextnavpagetreemode>
 DmaaP (project promoted to stand-alone)

2.
<https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=5734935=contextnavpagetreemode>
 Extensibility (project withdrawn)

3.
<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Logging+Enhancements+Project+Proposal> 
Logging (project promoted to stand-alone)

4.
<https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3247151=contextnavpagetreemode>
 Authorization and Authentication Framework (project promoted to stand-alone)

Thus, each one of these sub-projects has its own status and that status is 
clarified. I think it would be better to keep as is, as Common Frameworks can’t 
be considered rejected, approved, or withdrawn. 

 

Best regards, 

 

Alla Goldner

 

Open Network Division 

Amdocs Technology

 

 



 

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org <mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>  
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Terrill
Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2017 8:39 PM
To: onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org <mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> >
Subject: [onap-tsc] Projects status on wiki.

 

Hi All,

 

I was looking over the project (approved, proposed, etc) and had a few 
observations.

 

In the approved projects:

*   We have approved the openlab project 
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Open+Lab), but I couldn’t see that in the 
approved project list.

I assume that should be added (approved in the TSC on June 22)

 

In draft projects:

*   I believe Reference VNF project can be approved as it is part of 
integration now.  I assume it could be considered withdrawn???
*   ONAP operations manager/ONAP on containers is a project that lacks 
clarity to me.  It was proposed as a sub-project under ONAP OOM, however is it 
something that we should assume directly or need to discuss??
*   We need to discuss Common Frameworks, I believe from comments that it 
is considered withdrawn, however it would be good if the authors clarified that.
*   The application authorization framework is still there (and in the 
approved projects).  I assume its just part of the backlog to clean up as this 
was recent.

 

BR,

 

Steve

 

 

 

 

 <http://www.ericsson.com/> 

STEPHEN TERRILL 
Technology Specialist 
DUIC, Systems and Technology 
Development Unit IP & Cloud

Business Unit, IT & Cloud Products


Ericsson
Ericsson R Center, via de los Poblados 13
28033, Madrid, Spain
Phone +34 339 3005
Mobile +34 609 168 515
stephen.terr...@ericsson.com <mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com> 
www.ericsson.com <http://www.ericsson.com>  



 <http://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign> 

 

Legal entity: Ericsson España S.A, compay registration number ESA288568603. 
This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis 
of the terms set out at www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer 
<http://www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer>  

 

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, 

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer

___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Re: [onap-tsc] Projects status on wiki.

2017-07-01 Thread Alla Goldner 
Hi Steve, all,

Common Frameworks status: it is clarified under the project definition 
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6589597 that:

The project will include the following infrastructure:
1.
DmaaP
 (project promoted to stand-alone)
2.
Extensibility
 (project withdrawn)
3.
Logging 
(project promoted to stand-alone)
4.Authorization and Authentication 
Framework
 (project promoted to stand-alone)
Thus, each one of these sub-projects has its own status and that status is 
clarified. I think it would be better to keep as is, as Common Frameworks can't 
be considered rejected, approved, or withdrawn.

Best regards,

Alla Goldner

Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology


[cid:image001.png@01D2F2AB.A19F3260]

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of Stephen Terrill
Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2017 8:39 PM
To: onap-tsc 
Subject: [onap-tsc] Projects status on wiki.

Hi All,

I was looking over the project (approved, proposed, etc) and had a few 
observations.

In the approved projects:
-  We have approved the openlab project 
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Open+Lab), but I couldn't see that in the 
approved project list.
I assume that should be added (approved in the TSC on June 22)

In draft projects:
-  I believe Reference VNF project can be approved as it is part of 
integration now.  I assume it could be considered withdrawn???
-  ONAP operations manager/ONAP on containers is a project that lacks 
clarity to me.  It was proposed as a sub-project under ONAP OOM, however is it 
something that we should assume directly or need to discuss??
-  We need to discuss Common Frameworks, I believe from comments that 
it is considered withdrawn, however it would be good if the authors clarified 
that.
-  The application authorization framework is still there (and in the 
approved projects).  I assume its just part of the backlog to clean up as this 
was recent.

BR,

Steve




[Ericsson]
STEPHEN TERRILL
Technology Specialist
DUIC, Systems and Technology
Development Unit IP & Cloud
Business Unit, IT & Cloud Products

Ericsson
Ericsson R Center, via de los Poblados 13
28033, Madrid, Spain
Phone +34 339 3005
Mobile +34 609 168 515
stephen.terr...@ericsson.com
www.ericsson.com


[http://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign]

Legal entity: Ericsson España S.A, compay registration number ESA288568603. 
This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis 
of the terms set out at 
www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 

___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc