Re: [RELEASE]: release preparation

2012-08-17 Thread Roberto Galoppini
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Rob Weir  wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Dave Fisher 
> wrote:
> >
> > On Aug 17, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Dave Fisher 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> >>>
>  Hi Jürgen,
> 
>  On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:35:34PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as you have probably noticed I have started a VOTE for our AOO 3.4.1
> > release. We should prepare everything for next week to have it in
> place
> > if the 2 VOTEs (PPMC + IPMC) will pass successful.
> >
> > ToDo's
> > 1. Release Notes, already available. Potentially some updates or
> > improvements have to be integrated
> > 2. upload of the binaries on dist -> prepared and ready to start
> > 3. changing the download page, adapt download logic -> ???
> > 3.1 changed logic for the former 3.4 download -> they move to
> > archive.apache.org -> do we need to change something, we download
> via
> > Sourceforge?
> > 4. prepare announcement for the announcement list and the various
> social
> > medias
> > 5. ... what else?
> 
> 
>  We should upload the three official extensions to the extensions
>  repository:
> 
>  1) Presentation Minimizer
>  2) Presenter Console
>  3) MediaWiki Publisher
> >>>
> >>> These are in the source package, but we did not have an opportunity to
> VOTE on and inspect these binaries did we?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Some extensions were included in the binaries, installed automatically
> >> as part of the main product install.  They look like integrated parts
> >> of the UI.  You can see Presentation Manager in Impress, under
> >> Tools/Minimize Presentation.  I'm pretty sure the Presenter Console
> >> requires two displays, so I can't see it.
> >>
> >> The question is how we take the extensions in standalone form and put
> >> them in other common repositories?
> >>
> >> Would this be analogous to what Java-based projects do with Maven?
> >> They build and release a larger source and binary distribution for
> >> their release, and that release distribution might contain several
> >> related libraries.  And after the release is made a volunteer uploads
> >> the individual libraries to the central maven repository,
> >>
> >> How is that done with Maven central repository?  Does the project do
> >> that officially?  Or someone just does that individually?
> >
> > We do it officially in Apache POI. See
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/maven/.
> >
> > We've voted on these artifacts as well.
> >
> > I think that if we have Extensions that are packaged separately they can
> be distributed in similar manner to the source, sdk, and binary distros.
> They do need a VOTE thread and then verifiable.
> >
>
> I don't think they are packaged separately, at least not at the source
> level.  In other words, we don't have a source package for them that
> is separate from the full AOO 3.4.1. source packages.   And I doubt
> that in binary form they are self-contained release artifacts, each
> with their own LICENSE and NOTICE files.
>
> Although this could technically be done, to turn these into real
> release artifacts, I'm not sure it would be worth the effort of doing
> this, especially if anyone one of us can just upload the extensions to
> the repository without further effort.


Just in case, that's what is needed to be done.

Chose an account name, to be associated to an email address (not shown)
here:
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/user/register

Let us know on ooo-dev the account name, we'll associate the following
extensions to that account.

http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/PresentationMinimizer
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/presenter-screen
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/wikipublisher

Doing so those extensions won't be associated to Oracle nor Sun, as of
today.

Roberto


> In any case, for these
> extensions I think the plan is to more fully integrate them into the
> product in the future.
>
> > We can follow the AOO341 release with an Extensions Release.
> >
>
> Certainly not objections if someone wants to do that.
>
> -Rob
>
> > Regards,
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >>
> >> -Rob
> >>
> >>> In addition to being on the extensions site they'll need to be on
> Apache Mirrors as part of the release.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Dave
> >>>
> >>>
> 
> 
>  I guess they shouldn't be uploaded by an individual: they are
> officially
>  supported; so would it be possible to create an "Apache OO i Project"
>  user?
> >>>
> >>>
> 
> 
>  Regards
>  --
>  Ariel Constenla-Haile
>  La Plata, Argentina
> >>>
> >
>

-- 

This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It 
may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disse

Re: [RELEASE]: release preparation

2012-08-17 Thread Dave Fisher

On Aug 17, 2012, at 12:09 PM, Rob Weir wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
>> 
>> On Aug 17, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
 
 On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
 
> Hi Jürgen,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:35:34PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> as you have probably noticed I have started a VOTE for our AOO 3.4.1
>> release. We should prepare everything for next week to have it in place
>> if the 2 VOTEs (PPMC + IPMC) will pass successful.
>> 
>> ToDo's
>> 1. Release Notes, already available. Potentially some updates or
>> improvements have to be integrated
>> 2. upload of the binaries on dist -> prepared and ready to start
>> 3. changing the download page, adapt download logic -> ???
>> 3.1 changed logic for the former 3.4 download -> they move to
>> archive.apache.org -> do we need to change something, we download via
>> Sourceforge?
>> 4. prepare announcement for the announcement list and the various social
>> medias
>> 5. ... what else?
> 
> 
> We should upload the three official extensions to the extensions
> repository:
> 
> 1) Presentation Minimizer
> 2) Presenter Console
> 3) MediaWiki Publisher
 
 These are in the source package, but we did not have an opportunity to 
 VOTE on and inspect these binaries did we?
 
>>> 
>>> Some extensions were included in the binaries, installed automatically
>>> as part of the main product install.  They look like integrated parts
>>> of the UI.  You can see Presentation Manager in Impress, under
>>> Tools/Minimize Presentation.  I'm pretty sure the Presenter Console
>>> requires two displays, so I can't see it.
>>> 
>>> The question is how we take the extensions in standalone form and put
>>> them in other common repositories?
>>> 
>>> Would this be analogous to what Java-based projects do with Maven?
>>> They build and release a larger source and binary distribution for
>>> their release, and that release distribution might contain several
>>> related libraries.  And after the release is made a volunteer uploads
>>> the individual libraries to the central maven repository,
>>> 
>>> How is that done with Maven central repository?  Does the project do
>>> that officially?  Or someone just does that individually?
>> 
>> We do it officially in Apache POI. See 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/maven/.
>> 
>> We've voted on these artifacts as well.
>> 
>> I think that if we have Extensions that are packaged separately they can be 
>> distributed in similar manner to the source, sdk, and binary distros. They 
>> do need a VOTE thread and then verifiable.
>> 
> 
> I don't think they are packaged separately, at least not at the source
> level.  In other words, we don't have a source package for them that
> is separate from the full AOO 3.4.1. source packages.   And I doubt
> that in binary form they are self-contained release artifacts, each
> with their own LICENSE and NOTICE files.
> 
> Although this could technically be done, to turn these into real
> release artifacts, I'm not sure it would be worth the effort of doing
> this, especially if anyone one of us can just upload the extensions to
> the repository without further effort.   In any case, for these
> extensions I think the plan is to more fully integrate them into the
> product in the future.

Since the extensions can get separated out of the build then those artifacts 
should be exposed as three more binary artifacts with hashes for verification 
and VOTE.


> 
>> We can follow the AOO341 release with an Extensions Release.
>> 
> 
> Certainly not objections if someone wants to do that.

None here - just that we'll need to agree to release.

Regards,
Dave

> 
> -Rob
> 
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> -Rob
>>> 
 In addition to being on the extensions site they'll need to be on Apache 
 Mirrors as part of the release.
 
 Regards,
 Dave
 
 
> 
> 
> I guess they shouldn't be uploaded by an individual: they are officially
> supported; so would it be possible to create an "Apache OO i Project"
> user?
 
 
> 
> 
> Regards
> --
> Ariel Constenla-Haile
> La Plata, Argentina
 
>> 



Re: [RELEASE]: release preparation

2012-08-17 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
>
> On Aug 17, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>>>
 Hi Jürgen,

 On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:35:34PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as you have probably noticed I have started a VOTE for our AOO 3.4.1
> release. We should prepare everything for next week to have it in place
> if the 2 VOTEs (PPMC + IPMC) will pass successful.
>
> ToDo's
> 1. Release Notes, already available. Potentially some updates or
> improvements have to be integrated
> 2. upload of the binaries on dist -> prepared and ready to start
> 3. changing the download page, adapt download logic -> ???
> 3.1 changed logic for the former 3.4 download -> they move to
> archive.apache.org -> do we need to change something, we download via
> Sourceforge?
> 4. prepare announcement for the announcement list and the various social
> medias
> 5. ... what else?


 We should upload the three official extensions to the extensions
 repository:

 1) Presentation Minimizer
 2) Presenter Console
 3) MediaWiki Publisher
>>>
>>> These are in the source package, but we did not have an opportunity to VOTE 
>>> on and inspect these binaries did we?
>>>
>>
>> Some extensions were included in the binaries, installed automatically
>> as part of the main product install.  They look like integrated parts
>> of the UI.  You can see Presentation Manager in Impress, under
>> Tools/Minimize Presentation.  I'm pretty sure the Presenter Console
>> requires two displays, so I can't see it.
>>
>> The question is how we take the extensions in standalone form and put
>> them in other common repositories?
>>
>> Would this be analogous to what Java-based projects do with Maven?
>> They build and release a larger source and binary distribution for
>> their release, and that release distribution might contain several
>> related libraries.  And after the release is made a volunteer uploads
>> the individual libraries to the central maven repository,
>>
>> How is that done with Maven central repository?  Does the project do
>> that officially?  Or someone just does that individually?
>
> We do it officially in Apache POI. See 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/maven/.
>
> We've voted on these artifacts as well.
>
> I think that if we have Extensions that are packaged separately they can be 
> distributed in similar manner to the source, sdk, and binary distros. They do 
> need a VOTE thread and then verifiable.
>

I don't think they are packaged separately, at least not at the source
level.  In other words, we don't have a source package for them that
is separate from the full AOO 3.4.1. source packages.   And I doubt
that in binary form they are self-contained release artifacts, each
with their own LICENSE and NOTICE files.

Although this could technically be done, to turn these into real
release artifacts, I'm not sure it would be worth the effort of doing
this, especially if anyone one of us can just upload the extensions to
the repository without further effort.   In any case, for these
extensions I think the plan is to more fully integrate them into the
product in the future.

> We can follow the AOO341 release with an Extensions Release.
>

Certainly not objections if someone wants to do that.

-Rob

> Regards,
> Dave
>
>
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>>> In addition to being on the extensions site they'll need to be on Apache 
>>> Mirrors as part of the release.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>


 I guess they shouldn't be uploaded by an individual: they are officially
 supported; so would it be possible to create an "Apache OO i Project"
 user?
>>>
>>>


 Regards
 --
 Ariel Constenla-Haile
 La Plata, Argentina
>>>
>


Re: [RELEASE]: release preparation

2012-08-17 Thread Dave Fisher

On Aug 17, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
>> 
>> On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Jürgen,
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:35:34PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
 Hi,
 
 as you have probably noticed I have started a VOTE for our AOO 3.4.1
 release. We should prepare everything for next week to have it in place
 if the 2 VOTEs (PPMC + IPMC) will pass successful.
 
 ToDo's
 1. Release Notes, already available. Potentially some updates or
 improvements have to be integrated
 2. upload of the binaries on dist -> prepared and ready to start
 3. changing the download page, adapt download logic -> ???
 3.1 changed logic for the former 3.4 download -> they move to
 archive.apache.org -> do we need to change something, we download via
 Sourceforge?
 4. prepare announcement for the announcement list and the various social
 medias
 5. ... what else?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> We should upload the three official extensions to the extensions
>>> repository:
>>> 
>>> 1) Presentation Minimizer
>>> 2) Presenter Console
>>> 3) MediaWiki Publisher
>> 
>> These are in the source package, but we did not have an opportunity to VOTE 
>> on and inspect these binaries did we?
>> 
> 
> Some extensions were included in the binaries, installed automatically
> as part of the main product install.  They look like integrated parts
> of the UI.  You can see Presentation Manager in Impress, under
> Tools/Minimize Presentation.  I'm pretty sure the Presenter Console
> requires two displays, so I can't see it.
> 
> The question is how we take the extensions in standalone form and put
> them in other common repositories?
> 
> Would this be analogous to what Java-based projects do with Maven?
> They build and release a larger source and binary distribution for
> their release, and that release distribution might contain several
> related libraries.  And after the release is made a volunteer uploads
> the individual libraries to the central maven repository,
> 
> How is that done with Maven central repository?  Does the project do
> that officially?  Or someone just does that individually?

We do it officially in Apache POI. See 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/maven/.

We've voted on these artifacts as well.

I think that if we have Extensions that are packaged separately they can be 
distributed in similar manner to the source, sdk, and binary distros. They do 
need a VOTE thread and then verifiable.

We can follow the AOO341 release with an Extensions Release.

Regards,
Dave


> 
> -Rob
> 
>> In addition to being on the extensions site they'll need to be on Apache 
>> Mirrors as part of the release.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I guess they shouldn't be uploaded by an individual: they are officially
>>> supported; so would it be possible to create an "Apache OO i Project"
>>> user?
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> --
>>> Ariel Constenla-Haile
>>> La Plata, Argentina
>> 



Re: [RELEASE]: release preparation

2012-08-17 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
>
> On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>
>> Hi Jürgen,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:35:34PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> as you have probably noticed I have started a VOTE for our AOO 3.4.1
>>> release. We should prepare everything for next week to have it in place
>>> if the 2 VOTEs (PPMC + IPMC) will pass successful.
>>>
>>> ToDo's
>>> 1. Release Notes, already available. Potentially some updates or
>>> improvements have to be integrated
>>> 2. upload of the binaries on dist -> prepared and ready to start
>>> 3. changing the download page, adapt download logic -> ???
>>> 3.1 changed logic for the former 3.4 download -> they move to
>>> archive.apache.org -> do we need to change something, we download via
>>> Sourceforge?
>>> 4. prepare announcement for the announcement list and the various social
>>> medias
>>> 5. ... what else?
>>
>>
>> We should upload the three official extensions to the extensions
>> repository:
>>
>> 1) Presentation Minimizer
>> 2) Presenter Console
>> 3) MediaWiki Publisher
>
> These are in the source package, but we did not have an opportunity to VOTE 
> on and inspect these binaries did we?
>

Some extensions were included in the binaries, installed automatically
as part of the main product install.  They look like integrated parts
of the UI.  You can see Presentation Manager in Impress, under
Tools/Minimize Presentation.  I'm pretty sure the Presenter Console
requires two displays, so I can't see it.

The question is how we take the extensions in standalone form and put
them in other common repositories?

Would this be analogous to what Java-based projects do with Maven?
They build and release a larger source and binary distribution for
their release, and that release distribution might contain several
related libraries.  And after the release is made a volunteer uploads
the individual libraries to the central maven repository,

How is that done with Maven central repository?  Does the project do
that officially?  Or someone just does that individually?

-Rob

> In addition to being on the extensions site they'll need to be on Apache 
> Mirrors as part of the release.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
>
>>
>>
>> I guess they shouldn't be uploaded by an individual: they are officially
>> supported; so would it be possible to create an "Apache OO i Project"
>> user?
>
>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> --
>> Ariel Constenla-Haile
>> La Plata, Argentina
>


Re: [RELEASE]: release preparation

2012-08-17 Thread Dave Fisher

On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:

> Hi Jürgen,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:35:34PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> as you have probably noticed I have started a VOTE for our AOO 3.4.1
>> release. We should prepare everything for next week to have it in place
>> if the 2 VOTEs (PPMC + IPMC) will pass successful.
>> 
>> ToDo's
>> 1. Release Notes, already available. Potentially some updates or
>> improvements have to be integrated
>> 2. upload of the binaries on dist -> prepared and ready to start
>> 3. changing the download page, adapt download logic -> ???
>> 3.1 changed logic for the former 3.4 download -> they move to
>> archive.apache.org -> do we need to change something, we download via
>> Sourceforge?
>> 4. prepare announcement for the announcement list and the various social
>> medias
>> 5. ... what else?
> 
> 
> We should upload the three official extensions to the extensions
> repository:
> 
> 1) Presentation Minimizer
> 2) Presenter Console
> 3) MediaWiki Publisher

These are in the source package, but we did not have an opportunity to VOTE on 
and inspect these binaries did we?

In addition to being on the extensions site they'll need to be on Apache 
Mirrors as part of the release.

Regards,
Dave


> 
> 
> I guess they shouldn't be uploaded by an individual: they are officially
> supported; so would it be possible to create an "Apache OO i Project"
> user?


> 
> 
> Regards
> -- 
> Ariel Constenla-Haile
> La Plata, Argentina



Re: [RELEASE]: release preparation

2012-08-17 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Jürgen,

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:35:34PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> as you have probably noticed I have started a VOTE for our AOO 3.4.1
> release. We should prepare everything for next week to have it in place
> if the 2 VOTEs (PPMC + IPMC) will pass successful.
> 
> ToDo's
> 1. Release Notes, already available. Potentially some updates or
> improvements have to be integrated
> 2. upload of the binaries on dist -> prepared and ready to start
> 3. changing the download page, adapt download logic -> ???
> 3.1 changed logic for the former 3.4 download -> they move to
> archive.apache.org -> do we need to change something, we download via
> Sourceforge?
> 4. prepare announcement for the announcement list and the various social
> medias
> 5. ... what else?


We should upload the three official extensions to the extensions
repository:

1) Presentation Minimizer
2) Presenter Console
3) MediaWiki Publisher


I guess they shouldn't be uploaded by an individual: they are officially
supported; so would it be possible to create an "Apache OO i Project"
user?


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina


pgpebVuP7HO1g.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [RELEASE]: release preparation

2012-08-16 Thread Marcus (OOo)

Am 08/16/2012 06:28 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Jürgen Schmidtwrote:


Hi,

as you have probably noticed I have started a VOTE for our AOO 3.4.1
release. We should prepare everything for next week to have it in place
if the 2 VOTEs (PPMC + IPMC) will pass successful.

ToDo's
1. Release Notes, already available. Potentially some updates or
improvements have to be integrated
2. upload of the binaries on dist ->  prepared and ready to start
3. changing the download page, adapt download logic ->  ???
3.1 changed logic for the former 3.4 download ->  they move to
archive.apache.org ->  do we need to change something, we download via
Sourceforge?
4. prepare announcement for the announcement list and the various social
medias
5. ... what else?
6. be happy

Juergen



I think we're good with all this. I can take care of additional mods to the
release notes, and I'm pretty sure Marcus was already dealing with 3. and
3.1 items here.


Right, as it's documented here ...

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS
/AOO+3.4.1+Distribution+Tasks

... the very most parts affecting the download section are ready locally 
on my PC. Now waiting for the binaries for some final tests.


Marcus


Re: [RELEASE]: release preparation

2012-08-16 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Jürgen Schmidt  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as you have probably noticed I have started a VOTE for our AOO 3.4.1
> release. We should prepare everything for next week to have it in place
> if the 2 VOTEs (PPMC + IPMC) will pass successful.
>
> ToDo's
> 1. Release Notes, already available. Potentially some updates or
> improvements have to be integrated
> 2. upload of the binaries on dist -> prepared and ready to start
> 3. changing the download page, adapt download logic -> ???
> 3.1 changed logic for the former 3.4 download -> they move to
> archive.apache.org -> do we need to change something, we download via
> Sourceforge?
> 4. prepare announcement for the announcement list and the various social
> medias

I have a draft sitting in Roller right now.  I'll send out a link to
it in a separate thread.

> 5. ... what else?

I started this list on the wiki, based on what things we did for AOO 3.4.0:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4.1+Distribution+Tasks



> 6. be happy
>

+1.

> Juergen
>


Re: [RELEASE]: release preparation

2012-08-16 Thread Kay Schenk
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:

> Hi,
>
> as you have probably noticed I have started a VOTE for our AOO 3.4.1
> release. We should prepare everything for next week to have it in place
> if the 2 VOTEs (PPMC + IPMC) will pass successful.
>
> ToDo's
> 1. Release Notes, already available. Potentially some updates or
> improvements have to be integrated
> 2. upload of the binaries on dist -> prepared and ready to start
> 3. changing the download page, adapt download logic -> ???
> 3.1 changed logic for the former 3.4 download -> they move to
> archive.apache.org -> do we need to change something, we download via
> Sourceforge?
> 4. prepare announcement for the announcement list and the various social
> medias
> 5. ... what else?
> 6. be happy
>
> Juergen
>
>
I think we're good with all this. I can take care of additional mods to the
release notes, and I'm pretty sure Marcus was already dealing with 3. and
3.1 items here.




-- 

MzK

"Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think."
--
Niels Bohr