Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated
Hi On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Marcelo Santana wrote: > > [1]http://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian Very good Marcelo, congratulation! Albino
Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 15:48 -0300, Albino B Neto wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Marcelo Santana > wrote: > > > > [1]http://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian > > Very good Marcelo, congratulation! Howdy, It is - I had one question though. Looking at the information at the SF pages it says "The Debian packages in this repository are the same as provided by the Apache Foundation on its web page [1]." So, are these actual copies of files downloaded from AOO? Thanks, //drew
Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated
On 2012/08/25 03:09, drew said: > On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 15:48 -0300, Albino B Neto wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Marcelo Santana >> wrote: >>> >>> [1]http://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian >> >> Very good Marcelo, congratulation! > > Howdy, > > It is - I had one question though. > > Looking at the information at the SF pages it says > > "The Debian packages in this repository are the same as provided by the > Apache Foundation on its web page [1]." > > So, are these actual copies of files downloaded from AOO? Hmm... in that case, shouldn't these package files work on Squeeze, too? Why is Wheezy? Wheezy is not released yet. > > Thanks, > > //drew > -- Best regards, imacat ^_*' PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc <> News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/ Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/ Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/ Apache OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/ EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 at 12:09:57 -0700, drew wrote: [...] > Howdy, Hi there, > It is - I had one question though. > > Looking at the information at the SF pages it says > > "The Debian packages in this repository are the same as provided by > the Apache Foundation on its web page [1]." > > So, are these actual copies of files downloaded from AOO? Yes. As you can see on the README file, our intention is: | to provide a easier way for installation of the Apache OpenOffice | (AOO) on Debian and derivatives desktops while it is not available on | the official repositories, and make necessary adjustments (still at | the beginning) so that it is according the Debian policy and DFSG. *PS: Please reply with "CC" to me because I don't subscribe this list. Regards, -- Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778 http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6 3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 03:45:38 +0800, imacat wrote: [...] Hi there, > Hmm... in that case, shouldn't these package files work on > Squeeze, too? Why is Wheezy? Wheezy is not released yet. I'm not sure, but probably yes because there is no package dependency which prevent it to be installed on the squeeze. But I've not tested yet. Regards, -- Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778 http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6 3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467
Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated
Sounds like it might not take too much effort to get it to work in Ubuntu. Wolf Halton http://sourcefreedom.com Apache developer: wolfhal...@apache.org On Aug 24, 2012 4:37 PM, "Marcelo Santana" wrote: > On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 03:45:38 +0800, imacat > wrote: > > [...] > > Hi there, > > > Hmm... in that case, shouldn't these package files work on > > Squeeze, too? Why is Wheezy? Wheezy is not released yet. > > I'm not sure, but probably yes because there is no package dependency > which prevent it to be installed on the squeeze. But I've not tested > yet. > > > Regards, > > -- > Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778 > http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana > http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org > GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6 3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467 >
Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Wolf Halton wrote: > Sounds like it might not take too much effort to get it to work in Ubuntu. > > Wolf Halton > http://sourcefreedom.com > Apache developer: > wolfhal...@apache.org > On Aug 24, 2012 4:37 PM, "Marcelo Santana" wrote: > >> On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 03:45:38 +0800, imacat >> wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> Hi there, >> >> > Hmm... in that case, shouldn't these package files work on >> > Squeeze, too? Why is Wheezy? Wheezy is not released yet. >> >> I'm not sure, but probably yes because there is no package dependency >> which prevent it to be installed on the squeeze. But I've not tested >> yet. I am a Debian user. I switched to AOO a while back because of a regression in LO that affects my work. I have been using the dev builds, works greatthanks. I am testing Wheezy in a VM , tried the sourceforge Debian repo's. The issue I am seeing is Debian still uses 'openoffice' in their package management systems. Trying to find/install openoffice results in links to libreoffice. While this is probable an issue to discuss with Debian, I am wondering how this repo is working for others. What is the package name to install AOO ? -- Peace Greg Madden
Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Greg Madden wrote: > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Wolf Halton wrote: >> Sounds like it might not take too much effort to get it to work in Ubuntu. >> >> Wolf Halton >> http://sourcefreedom.com >> Apache developer: >> wolfhal...@apache.org >> On Aug 24, 2012 4:37 PM, "Marcelo Santana" wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 03:45:38 +0800, imacat >>> wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> Hi there, >>> >>> > Hmm... in that case, shouldn't these package files work on >>> > Squeeze, too? Why is Wheezy? Wheezy is not released yet. >>> >>> I'm not sure, but probably yes because there is no package dependency >>> which prevent it to be installed on the squeeze. But I've not tested >>> yet. > > I am a Debian user. I switched to AOO a while back because of a > regression in LO that affects my work. I have been using the dev > builds, works greatthanks. > > I am testing Wheezy in a VM , tried the sourceforge Debian repo's. The > issue I am seeing is Debian still uses 'openoffice' in their package > management systems. Trying to find/install openoffice results in > links to libreoffice. My mistake, wrong sources.list entry. > > While this is probable an issue to discuss with Debian, I am wondering > how this repo is working for others. What is the package name to > install AOO ? I now see it is openoffice.org3. Debian, Wheezy , does use 'openoffice.org though. -- Peace Greg Madden
Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Am 26.08.2012 23:42, schrieb Greg Madden: > > I am testing Wheezy in a VM , tried the sourceforge Debian repo's. > The issue I am seeing is Debian still uses 'openoffice' in their > package management systems. Trying to find/install openoffice > results in links to libreoffice. > > While this is probable an issue to discuss with Debian, I am > wondering how this repo is working for others. What is the package > name to install AOO ? > That is a problem. There is no META-Package to manage the high numbers of packages you have to install. I didn't find a short description which packages you have to install for a working installation. Kind regards Mechtilde -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlA7H2MACgkQucZfh1OziSssqwCfbt5KPLxJQJIs2nf++ED/7IY3 V3MAnA4Las9K3GvV0hSgEYDCTFPHOdhb =/GHq -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:47:23 -0400, Wolf Halton wrote: Hi there, > Sounds like it might not take too much effort to get it to work in > Ubuntu. As the packages are the same provided by Apache Foundation, if you can install Apache OO running "dpkg -i *.deb" you also can install using this repository with bonus to may use any package manager that you prefer. -- Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778 http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6 3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467
Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:18:59 +0200, Mechtilde wrote: [...] > That is a problem. There is no META-Package to manage the high numbers > of packages you have to install. I agree with you. I intend to create META-packages for each language but for while I preferred to release closely to AOO's release to have a feedback from all as soon as possible. > I didn't find a short description which packages you have to install > for a working installation. As you can see in README file[1], e.g. for Deutsch version you need to run: $ gpg --recv-keys 90127F5B && gpg --export --armor 90127F5B|sudo apt-key add - and $ sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install openoffice.org3-de ooobasis3.4-de-binfilter openoffice.org3-writer openoffice.org3-calc openoffice.org3-impress openoffice.org3-base openoffice.org3-draw openoffice.org3-math ooobasis3.4-pyuno ooobasis3.4-ooofonts ooobasis3.4-ooolinguistic openoffice.org-debian-menus [1]http://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian/ Kind regards, -- Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778 http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6 3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467
