Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated

2012-08-27 Thread Marcelo Santana
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:18:59 +0200, Mechtilde  wrote:

[...]
 
> That is a problem. There is no META-Package to manage the high numbers
> of packages you have to install.

I agree with you. I intend to create META-packages for each language
but for while I preferred to release closely to AOO's release to have a
feedback from all as soon as possible.
 
> I didn't find a short description which packages you have to install
> for a working installation.

As you can see in README file[1], e.g. for Deutsch version you need to
run:

$ gpg --recv-keys 90127F5B && gpg --export --armor 90127F5B|sudo
apt-key add -

and

$ sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install openoffice.org3-de
ooobasis3.4-de-binfilter openoffice.org3-writer openoffice.org3-calc
openoffice.org3-impress openoffice.org3-base openoffice.org3-draw
openoffice.org3-math ooobasis3.4-pyuno ooobasis3.4-ooofonts
ooobasis3.4-ooolinguistic openoffice.org-debian-menus

[1]http://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian/


Kind regards,

--
Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778
  http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana
  http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org
 GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6  3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467


Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated

2012-08-27 Thread Marcelo Santana
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:47:23 -0400, Wolf Halton 
wrote:

Hi there,

> Sounds like it might not take too much effort to get it to work in
> Ubuntu.

As the packages are the same provided by Apache Foundation, if you can
install Apache OO running "dpkg -i *.deb" you also can install using
this repository with bonus to may use any package manager that you
prefer.

--
Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778
  http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana
  http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org
 GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6  3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467


Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated

2012-08-27 Thread Mechtilde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

Am 26.08.2012 23:42, schrieb Greg Madden:

> 
> I am testing Wheezy in a VM , tried the sourceforge Debian repo's.
> The issue I am seeing is Debian still uses 'openoffice'  in their
> package management systems. Trying to find/install  openoffice
> results in links to libreoffice.
> 
> While this is probable an issue to discuss with Debian, I am
> wondering how this repo is working for others.  What is the package
> name to install AOO ?
> 

That is a problem. There is no META-Package to manage the high numbers
of packages you have to install.

I didn't find a short description which packages you have to install
for a working installation.

Kind regards

Mechtilde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlA7H2MACgkQucZfh1OziSssqwCfbt5KPLxJQJIs2nf++ED/7IY3
V3MAnA4Las9K3GvV0hSgEYDCTFPHOdhb
=/GHq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated

2012-08-26 Thread Greg Madden
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Greg Madden  wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Wolf Halton  wrote:
>> Sounds like it might not take too much effort to get it to work in Ubuntu.
>>
>> Wolf Halton
>> http://sourcefreedom.com
>> Apache developer:
>> wolfhal...@apache.org
>> On Aug 24, 2012 4:37 PM, "Marcelo Santana"  wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 03:45:38 +0800, imacat 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> > Hmm... in that case, shouldn't these package files work on
>>> > Squeeze, too?  Why is Wheezy?  Wheezy is not released yet.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure, but probably yes because there is no package dependency
>>> which prevent it to be installed on the squeeze. But I've not tested
>>> yet.
>
> I am a Debian user. I switched to AOO a while back because of a
> regression in LO that affects my work. I have been using the dev
> builds, works greatthanks.
>
> I am testing Wheezy in a VM , tried the sourceforge Debian repo's. The
> issue I am seeing is Debian still uses 'openoffice'  in their package
> management systems. Trying to find/install  openoffice results in
> links to libreoffice.

My mistake, wrong sources.list entry.

>
> While this is probable an issue to discuss with Debian, I am wondering
> how this repo is working for others.  What is the package name to
> install AOO ?

I now see it is openoffice.org3.

Debian, Wheezy , does use 'openoffice.org though.

-- 
Peace

Greg Madden


Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated

2012-08-26 Thread Greg Madden
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Wolf Halton  wrote:
> Sounds like it might not take too much effort to get it to work in Ubuntu.
>
> Wolf Halton
> http://sourcefreedom.com
> Apache developer:
> wolfhal...@apache.org
> On Aug 24, 2012 4:37 PM, "Marcelo Santana"  wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 03:45:38 +0800, imacat 
>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> > Hmm... in that case, shouldn't these package files work on
>> > Squeeze, too?  Why is Wheezy?  Wheezy is not released yet.
>>
>> I'm not sure, but probably yes because there is no package dependency
>> which prevent it to be installed on the squeeze. But I've not tested
>> yet.

I am a Debian user. I switched to AOO a while back because of a
regression in LO that affects my work. I have been using the dev
builds, works greatthanks.

I am testing Wheezy in a VM , tried the sourceforge Debian repo's. The
issue I am seeing is Debian still uses 'openoffice'  in their package
management systems. Trying to find/install  openoffice results in
links to libreoffice.

While this is probable an issue to discuss with Debian, I am wondering
how this repo is working for others.  What is the package name to
install AOO ?

-- 
Peace

Greg Madden


Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated

2012-08-26 Thread Wolf Halton
Sounds like it might not take too much effort to get it to work in Ubuntu.

Wolf Halton
http://sourcefreedom.com
Apache developer:
wolfhal...@apache.org
On Aug 24, 2012 4:37 PM, "Marcelo Santana"  wrote:

> On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 03:45:38 +0800, imacat 
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Hi there,
>
> > Hmm... in that case, shouldn't these package files work on
> > Squeeze, too?  Why is Wheezy?  Wheezy is not released yet.
>
> I'm not sure, but probably yes because there is no package dependency
> which prevent it to be installed on the squeeze. But I've not tested
> yet.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778
>   http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana
>   http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org
>  GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6  3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467
>


Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated

2012-08-24 Thread Marcelo Santana
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 03:45:38 +0800, imacat 
wrote:

[...]

Hi there,

> Hmm... in that case, shouldn't these package files work on
> Squeeze, too?  Why is Wheezy?  Wheezy is not released yet.

I'm not sure, but probably yes because there is no package dependency
which prevent it to be installed on the squeeze. But I've not tested
yet.


Regards,
 
--
Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778
  http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana
  http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org   
 GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6  3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467


Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated

2012-08-24 Thread Marcelo Santana
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 at 12:09:57 -0700, drew wrote:

[...]

> Howdy,

Hi there,

> It is - I had one question though.
> 
> Looking at the information at the SF pages it says 
> 
> "The Debian packages in this repository are the same as provided by
> the Apache Foundation on its web page [1]."
>
> So, are these actual copies of files downloaded from AOO?

Yes. As you can see on the README file, our intention is:

| to provide a easier way for installation of the Apache OpenOffice
| (AOO) on Debian and derivatives desktops while it is not available on
| the official repositories, and make necessary adjustments (still at
| the beginning) so that it is according the Debian policy and DFSG.


*PS: Please reply with "CC" to me because I don't subscribe this list.

Regards,
 
--
Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778
  http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana
  http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org   
 GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6  3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated

2012-08-24 Thread imacat
On 2012/08/25 03:09, drew said:
> On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 15:48 -0300, Albino B Neto wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Marcelo Santana
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> [1]http://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian
>>
>> Very good Marcelo, congratulation!
> 
> Howdy,
> 
> It is - I had one question though.
> 
> Looking at the information at the SF pages it says 
> 
> "The Debian packages in this repository are the same as provided by the
> Apache Foundation on its web page [1]."
> 
> So, are these actual copies of files downloaded from AOO?

Hmm... in that case, shouldn't these package files work on Squeeze,
too?  Why is Wheezy?  Wheezy is not released yet.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> //drew
> 


-- 
Best regards,
imacat ^_*' 
PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc

<> News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/
Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/
Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/
Apache OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/
EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated

2012-08-24 Thread drew
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 15:48 -0300, Albino B Neto wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Marcelo Santana
>  wrote:
> >
> > [1]http://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian
> 
> Very good Marcelo, congratulation!

Howdy,

It is - I had one question though.

Looking at the information at the SF pages it says 

"The Debian packages in this repository are the same as provided by the
Apache Foundation on its web page [1]."

So, are these actual copies of files downloaded from AOO?

Thanks,

//drew



Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated

2012-08-24 Thread Albino B Neto
Hi

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Marcelo Santana
 wrote:
>
> [1]http://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian

Very good Marcelo, congratulation!

Albino


Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated

2012-08-24 Thread Marcelo Santana
Hi all,

The unofficial Apache OO Debian repository[1] was updated and now it is
providing last version of Apache Openoffice with all available
languages.

[1]http://sourceforge.net/projects/apacheoo-deb/files/debian

Again thanks to the Sourceforge's support!

Regards,

--
Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778
  http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana
  http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org   
 GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6  3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature