Re: openEHR@ StackExchange - update
By the way, even if we don't get a private openEHR space we can always keep using stackoverflow with the correct tags, and that means creating a new openEHR tag. For creating a new tag, 1500 reputation is needed in stackoverflow (which is a lot). I suggest we create the openEHR tag and correct the already asked questions to change the hl7 to openEHR tag. Regards 2015-06-19 20:18 GMT+02:00 Thomas Beale thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com: To succeed with openehr.StackExchange.com, the committers phase needs 200 total. We particularly *need people who want to ask questions* to commit (do it here http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/87508/openehr). Secondly, 50% of those committers need 200+ reputation on any other StackExchange site. You can see all the sites here http://stackexchange.com/sites. - For IT devs and other techies, geek docs etc, I recommend you make sure you are always logged in when using StackOverflow, ServerFault etc which you probably already do - just be a bit more active in commenting, asking questions etc, and you'll get 20 rep in no time - For clinical people, and other non-IT, consider joining another StackExchange site (Physics, Homebrewing, Tor, Community Building, Lifehacks, ) and start posting questions and answers. I joined a few - it is actually worth it to learn how StackExchange works. Let's give it a proper go before giving in and looking elsewhere for a way to do openEHR QA! - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close
Getting closer still in our effort to establish an openEHR area in StackExchange. http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/87508/openehr We now have oodles of followers (96) and enough questions but do not have enough upvotes on 9 remaining questions to pass to the next stage. If you have not yet voted, please do so. Sort the list of questions by votes and scroll down until you hit those with zero or more votes - these are the ones that need yo be upvoted to get us over the finishing line. Don't worry if you are not actually that interested in the question - it is just the numbers that count at this point. We still need about 70 votes in total. If 15 people cast their 5 votes tactically we will make it!! Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: i...@freshehr.com twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation Management Board Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 11 June 2015 at 16:58, Seref Arikan serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com wrote: You're probably right. It is hard to find the acceptable level of strategic voting :) On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:54 PM, David Moner dam...@gmail.com wrote: I would not do so. This is not an automatic process, this first phase is just a way of filtering proposals. For sure the people in StackExchange will evaluate each proposal in detail, and if they find that votes and questions are clearly addressed or governed the proposal won't be accepted. 2015-06-11 17:41 GMT+02:00 Seref Arikan serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com: Thanks, can someone write a comment (shamelessly in capitals..) under the highest voted (16 the moment) question asking visitors to NOT to vote for questions with 10 votes? My user can't do it for some reason. There are ~19 wasted points that could have been used on other questions a.t.m and people will just arrive and keep upvoting the top 5 ones. (This is a weird design; if 10 votes do not help, why let users vote beyond 10 at that stage?) On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Cavero Barca, Carlos carlos.cav...@atos.net wrote: Done! 90 followers :) Regards. Carlos. -Original Message- From: openEHR-technical [mailto: openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Arild Faxvaag Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:46 PM To: For openEHR technical discussions Subject: Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close done signing up and upvoting. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener información confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente y pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electrónico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningún compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificación escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al máximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no será responsable de cualesquiera daños que puedan resultar de una transmisión de virus. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -- David Moner Cano Grupo de Informática Biomédica - IBIME Instituto ITACA http://www.ibime.upv.es http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV) Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3ª planta Valencia – 46022 (España) ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close
I think it could be also interesting to answer the questions we know the answer for, to show there are also experts and discussion out there ;D 2015-06-11 17:58 GMT+02:00 Seref Arikan serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com: You're probably right. It is hard to find the acceptable level of strategic voting :) On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:54 PM, David Moner dam...@gmail.com wrote: I would not do so. This is not an automatic process, this first phase is just a way of filtering proposals. For sure the people in StackExchange will evaluate each proposal in detail, and if they find that votes and questions are clearly addressed or governed the proposal won't be accepted. 2015-06-11 17:41 GMT+02:00 Seref Arikan serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com: Thanks, can someone write a comment (shamelessly in capitals..) under the highest voted (16 the moment) question asking visitors to NOT to vote for questions with 10 votes? My user can't do it for some reason. There are ~19 wasted points that could have been used on other questions a.t.m and people will just arrive and keep upvoting the top 5 ones. (This is a weird design; if 10 votes do not help, why let users vote beyond 10 at that stage?) On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Cavero Barca, Carlos carlos.cav...@atos.net wrote: Done! 90 followers :) Regards. Carlos. -Original Message- From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Arild Faxvaag Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:46 PM To: For openEHR technical discussions Subject: Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close done signing up and upvoting. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener información confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente y pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electrónico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningún compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificación escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al máximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no será responsable de cualesquiera daños que puedan resultar de una transmisión de virus. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -- David Moner Cano Grupo de Informática Biomédica - IBIME Instituto ITACA http://www.ibime.upv.es http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV) Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3ª planta Valencia – 46022 (España) ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close
On 12/06/2015 16:50, Diego Boscá wrote: I think it could be also interesting to answer the questions we know the answer for, to show there are also experts and discussion out there ;D I have not figured out whether that's what they want or not - but if we assume that the 'example' questions don't get deleted by the admins, you are probably right. Maybe we just start using it. - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close
On 12/06/2015 16:50, Diego Boscá wrote: I think it could be also interesting to answer the questions we know the answer for, to show there are also experts and discussion out there ;D If you look at 'hardware-recommendations', another new StackExchange area in the 'Commitment' phase (openEHR is in the 'initial' phase), the questions generally have no answers yet, and also they are 'locked', and it seems that all you can do is get enough 'committers' (people who sign up in some way to the specific area). It's a strange process to be sure, but I think the main thing we need to do is to get votes on those last 8 questions and see what happens next. - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close
Just tweeted for help. Feel free to do the same or RT On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Thomas Beale thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com wrote: We are getting closer http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/87508/openehrto the next step. We have 76 followers. We still need 17 questions with 10 votes. We have the requisite number of questions, it's just a case of people using their votes on them (don't worry if they don't really interest you, they are example questions - to get a stackexchange site, the community has to demonstrate interest). Many of the questions with 10 votes do have some votes, so we probably need a total of about 120 up-votes to get through this stage. I think each user gets 5 votes, so that's equivalent to 24 users. Remember, there is no value in up-voting a question that already has 10 or more votes. - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close
I sent support request to openehr-jp mailing list. Shinji 2015-06-11 7:56 GMT+09:00 Thomas Beale thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com: We are getting closer to the next step. We have 76 followers. We still need 17 questions with 10 votes. We have the requisite number of questions, it's just a case of people using their votes on them (don't worry if they don't really interest you, they are example questions - to get a stackexchange site, the community has to demonstrate interest). Many of the questions with 10 votes do have some votes, so we probably need a total of about 120 up-votes to get through this stage. I think each user gets 5 votes, so that's equivalent to 24 users. Remember, there is no value in up-voting a question that already has 10 or more votes. - thomas ___ openEHR-clinical mailing list openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close
Thanks Shinji, We are now up to 85 followers and only need 14 more of the current questions to be upvoted by 10 or more people and we are there. If you still have votes please use them and be tactical :) Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: i...@freshehr.com twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation Management Board Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 11 June 2015 at 13:42, Shinji KOBAYASHI sk...@moss.gr.jp wrote: I sent support request to openehr-jp mailing list. Shinji 2015-06-11 7:56 GMT+09:00 Thomas Beale thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com : We are getting closer to the next step. We have 76 followers. We still need 17 questions with 10 votes. We have the requisite number of questions, it's just a case of people using their votes on them (don't worry if they don't really interest you, they are example questions - to get a stackexchange site, the community has to demonstrate interest). Many of the questions with 10 votes do have some votes, so we probably need a total of about 120 up-votes to get through this stage. I think each user gets 5 votes, so that's equivalent to 24 users. Remember, there is no value in up-voting a question that already has 10 or more votes. - thomas ___ openEHR-clinical mailing list openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-clinical mailing list openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close
done signing up and upvoting. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close
How would we get more than the five provided votes per person? Would love to vote more..:-). == Regards, Jan-Marc Mobile 06 53785650 *MEDvision360 BV* www.MedVision360.com www.MedRecord.nl House of Vision Rouwkooplaan 5 te Voorschoten 2015-06-11 15:04 GMT+02:00 Ian McNicoll i...@freshehr.com: Thanks Shinji, We are now up to 85 followers and only need 14 more of the current questions to be upvoted by 10 or more people and we are there. If you still have votes please use them and be tactical :) Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: i...@freshehr.com twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation Management Board Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 11 June 2015 at 13:42, Shinji KOBAYASHI sk...@moss.gr.jp wrote: I sent support request to openehr-jp mailing list. Shinji 2015-06-11 7:56 GMT+09:00 Thomas Beale thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com : We are getting closer to the next step. We have 76 followers. We still need 17 questions with 10 votes. We have the requisite number of questions, it's just a case of people using their votes on them (don't worry if they don't really interest you, they are example questions - to get a stackexchange site, the community has to demonstrate interest). Many of the questions with 10 votes do have some votes, so we probably need a total of about 120 up-votes to get through this stage. I think each user gets 5 votes, so that's equivalent to 24 users. Remember, there is no value in up-voting a question that already has 10 or more votes. - thomas ___ openEHR-clinical mailing list openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-clinical mailing list openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -- This e-mail message is intended exclusively for the addressee(s). Please inform us immediately if you are not the addressee. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
RE: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close
Done! 90 followers :) Regards. Carlos. -Original Message- From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Arild Faxvaag Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:46 PM To: For openEHR technical discussions Subject: Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close done signing up and upvoting. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener información confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente y pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electrónico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningún compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificación escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al máximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no será responsable de cualesquiera daños que puedan resultar de una transmisión de virus. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close
Thanks, can someone write a comment (shamelessly in capitals..) under the highest voted (16 the moment) question asking visitors to NOT to vote for questions with 10 votes? My user can't do it for some reason. There are ~19 wasted points that could have been used on other questions a.t.m and people will just arrive and keep upvoting the top 5 ones. (This is a weird design; if 10 votes do not help, why let users vote beyond 10 at that stage?) On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Cavero Barca, Carlos carlos.cav...@atos.net wrote: Done! 90 followers :) Regards. Carlos. -Original Message- From: openEHR-technical [mailto: openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Arild Faxvaag Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:46 PM To: For openEHR technical discussions Subject: Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close done signing up and upvoting. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener información confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente y pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electrónico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningún compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificación escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al máximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no será responsable de cualesquiera daños que puedan resultar de una transmisión de virus. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close
I would not do so. This is not an automatic process, this first phase is just a way of filtering proposals. For sure the people in StackExchange will evaluate each proposal in detail, and if they find that votes and questions are clearly addressed or governed the proposal won't be accepted. 2015-06-11 17:41 GMT+02:00 Seref Arikan serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com: Thanks, can someone write a comment (shamelessly in capitals..) under the highest voted (16 the moment) question asking visitors to NOT to vote for questions with 10 votes? My user can't do it for some reason. There are ~19 wasted points that could have been used on other questions a.t.m and people will just arrive and keep upvoting the top 5 ones. (This is a weird design; if 10 votes do not help, why let users vote beyond 10 at that stage?) On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Cavero Barca, Carlos carlos.cav...@atos.net wrote: Done! 90 followers :) Regards. Carlos. -Original Message- From: openEHR-technical [mailto: openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Arild Faxvaag Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:46 PM To: For openEHR technical discussions Subject: Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close done signing up and upvoting. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener información confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente y pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electrónico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningún compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificación escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al máximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no será responsable de cualesquiera daños que puedan resultar de una transmisión de virus. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -- David Moner Cano Grupo de Informática Biomédica - IBIME Instituto ITACA http://www.ibime.upv.es http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV) Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3ª planta Valencia – 46022 (España) ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close
You're probably right. It is hard to find the acceptable level of strategic voting :) On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:54 PM, David Moner dam...@gmail.com wrote: I would not do so. This is not an automatic process, this first phase is just a way of filtering proposals. For sure the people in StackExchange will evaluate each proposal in detail, and if they find that votes and questions are clearly addressed or governed the proposal won't be accepted. 2015-06-11 17:41 GMT+02:00 Seref Arikan serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com : Thanks, can someone write a comment (shamelessly in capitals..) under the highest voted (16 the moment) question asking visitors to NOT to vote for questions with 10 votes? My user can't do it for some reason. There are ~19 wasted points that could have been used on other questions a.t.m and people will just arrive and keep upvoting the top 5 ones. (This is a weird design; if 10 votes do not help, why let users vote beyond 10 at that stage?) On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Cavero Barca, Carlos carlos.cav...@atos.net wrote: Done! 90 followers :) Regards. Carlos. -Original Message- From: openEHR-technical [mailto: openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Arild Faxvaag Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:46 PM To: For openEHR technical discussions Subject: Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close done signing up and upvoting. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener información confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente y pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electrónico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningún compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificación escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al máximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no será responsable de cualesquiera daños que puedan resultar de una transmisión de virus. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -- David Moner Cano Grupo de Informática Biomédica - IBIME Instituto ITACA http://www.ibime.upv.es http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV) Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3ª planta Valencia – 46022 (España) ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close
We are getting closer http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/87508/openehrto the next step. We have 76 followers. We still need 17 questions with 10 votes. We have the requisite number of questions, it's just a case of people using their votes on them (don't worry if they don't really interest you, they are example questions - to get a stackexchange site, the community has to demonstrate interest). Many of the questions with 10 votes do have some votes, so we probably need a total of about 120 up-votes to get through this stage. I think each user gets 5 votes, so that's equivalent to 24 users. Remember, there is no value in up-voting a question that already has 10 or more votes. - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - progress
Yes - please don't vote higher than 10. These questions are 'example' questions - this is the community testing phase of StackExchange. I'm not sure if the questions get trashed later on or not, but we have to assume for now that they are used solely for gauging community size and interest. We now have 64 followers total - that's what is needed; we still need 27 questions with a score of 10. We already have 13 with =10; and we have a total of 34 questions. So we need (at least): * 21 of the remaining questions to get a score of 10 * 6 new questions with 10 votes each We probably need a bit more than this, since as Seref says, a few questions may get removed by the StackExchange reviewers. *Voting for questions you would not personally be interested in is ok *- we just need to up the scores - please use all your votes! - thomas On 09/06/2015 08:32, Seref Arikan wrote: To all who are helping with this: there are questions with upvotes 10. I think this is a waste of your upvotes; we need to get as many as possible to 10, upvoting beyond 10 does not help with our goal of creating an openEHR area. Also, some of the questions do not comply with QA format; generic discussions can be problematic if someone reviews them. Again, these would be waste of upvotes. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - progress
Thanks Thomas, I would thoroughly endorse this effort and have added my full quota of questions and upvotes. e.g. How do I set a codedText default value in an .oet Template? and What are the key Ref Model attributes that a clinical modeller needs to understand? I am sure almost all of us here have asked or answered these kind of questions and I have found StackOverflow and StackExchange invaluable for this kind of use. Let's try to get this off the ground. Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: i...@freshehr.com twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation Management Board Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 8 June 2015 at 21:52, Thomas Beale thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com wrote: For all those who suffer from 'not enough expert resources for openEHR' you can make it happen - if we can create an openEHR StackExchange area. To get a StackExchange area, we still need to get 16 more followers and create 38 more example questions with a score of 10 or more http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/87508/openehr. We actually only need 10 new questions - we have 28, they just need more votes. To up the scores on the questions, just upvote them (but not beyond 10). Remember these are example questions - the idea is just to show that there are enough people interested to make it worthwhile. Please use all your possible upvotes to get more questions to a score of 10! Please forward to colleagues in your institution or company to get us over the line. thanks - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - progress
Thanks Thomas, I would throroughly endorse this effort and have added my full q Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: i...@freshehr.com twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation Management Board Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 8 June 2015 at 21:52, Thomas Beale thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com wrote: For all those who suffer from 'not enough expert resources for openEHR' you can make it happen - if we can create an openEHR StackExchange area. To get a StackExchange area, we still need to get 16 more followers and create 38 more example questions with a score of 10 or more http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/87508/openehr. We actually only need 10 new questions - we have 28, they just need more votes. To up the scores on the questions, just upvote them (but not beyond 10). Remember these are example questions - the idea is just to show that there are enough people interested to make it worthwhile. Please use all your possible upvotes to get more questions to a score of 10! Please forward to colleagues in your institution or company to get us over the line. thanks - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - progress
To all who are helping with this: there are questions with upvotes 10. I think this is a waste of your upvotes; we need to get as many as possible to 10, upvoting beyond 10 does not help with our goal of creating an openEHR area. Also, some of the questions do not comply with QA format; generic discussions can be problematic if someone reviews them. Again, these would be waste of upvotes. On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Thomas Beale thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com wrote: For all those who suffer from 'not enough expert resources for openEHR' you can make it happen - if we can create an openEHR StackExchange area. To get a StackExchange area, we still need to get 16 more followers and create 38 more example questions with a score of 10 or more http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/87508/openehr. We actually only need 10 new questions - we have 28, they just need more votes. To up the scores on the questions, just upvote them (but not beyond 10). Remember these are example questions - the idea is just to show that there are enough people interested to make it worthwhile. Please use all your possible upvotes to get more questions to a score of 10! Please forward to colleagues in your institution or company to get us over the line. thanks - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - progress
Done the same, still some more to go.. == Regards, Jan-Marc *MEDvision360 BV* 2015-06-09 8:26 GMT+02:00 Ian McNicoll i...@freshehr.com: Thanks Thomas, I would thoroughly endorse this effort and have added my full quota of questions and upvotes. e.g. How do I set a codedText default value in an .oet Template? and What are the key Ref Model attributes that a clinical modeller needs to understand? I am sure almost all of us here have asked or answered these kind of questions and I have found StackOverflow and StackExchange invaluable for this kind of use. Let's try to get this off the ground. Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: i...@freshehr.com twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation Management Board Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 8 June 2015 at 21:52, Thomas Beale thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com wrote: For all those who suffer from 'not enough expert resources for openEHR' you can make it happen - if we can create an openEHR StackExchange area. To get a StackExchange area, we still need to get 16 more followers and create 38 more example questions with a score of 10 or more http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/87508/openehr. We actually only need 10 new questions - we have 28, they just need more votes. To up the scores on the questions, just upvote them (but not beyond 10). Remember these are example questions - the idea is just to show that there are enough people interested to make it worthwhile. Please use all your possible upvotes to get more questions to a score of 10! Please forward to colleagues in your institution or company to get us over the line. thanks - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -- This e-mail message is intended exclusively for the addressee(s). Please inform us immediately if you are not the addressee. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
RE: openEHR @ StackExchange
@all please try to upvote answers by openEHR community members on openEHR/EHR/EMR/... related questions, that's a good way to increase reputation (just received two upvotes, so I guess someone here already started that, also I upvoted Koray and Erik's answers). -- Kind regards, Eng. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez http://cabolabs.com From: k.ata...@auckland.ac.nz To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org Subject: RE: openEHR @ StackExchange Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 04:08:30 + One needs at least 1500 reputations to introduce a new tag (obviously openEHR doesn't exist yet). Cheers, -koray -Original Message- From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale Sent: Monday, 25 May 2015 11:41 p.m. To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org; For openEHR clinical discussions Subject: Re: openEHR @ StackExchange On 25/05/2015 12:16, Diego Boscá wrote: I would assume it can be both: a question could be just about specs (just the openEHR tag) or about any specific implementation (e.g. openEHR and java) yep - that's how I think it would work. - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
RE: openEHR @ StackExchange
Could questions be about modelling, or implementation/specs only? Regards, Silje -Original Message- From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 1:41 PM To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org; For openEHR clinical discussions Subject: Re: openEHR @ StackExchange On 25/05/2015 12:16, Diego Boscá wrote: I would assume it can be both: a question could be just about specs (just the openEHR tag) or about any specific implementation (e.g. openEHR and java) yep - that's how I think it would work. - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange
I think we need both. Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: i...@freshehr.com twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation Management Board Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 26 May 2015 at 08:47, Bakke, Silje Ljosland silje.ljosland.ba...@helse-bergen.no wrote: Could questions be about modelling, or implementation/specs only? Regards, Silje -Original Message- From: openEHR-technical [mailto: openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 1:41 PM To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org; For openEHR clinical discussions Subject: Re: openEHR @ StackExchange On 25/05/2015 12:16, Diego Boscá wrote: I would assume it can be both: a question could be just about specs (just the openEHR tag) or about any specific implementation (e.g. openEHR and java) yep - that's how I think it would work. - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange
Hello everyone This is great news for openEHR but at the moment, the link between the specification and the implementation is not clear enough and the volume of questions might be low. The majority of questions in the technical list up until 2013 were regarding modelling and specification changes / clarifications. There are many more technical questions, concerning implementation, lately that could attract questions on which option works better than others in a specific setting. As a simplistic comparison, UML and modelling related questions are lumped under stack overflow currently. I think that hosting our own StackExchange type of website might work better at this point. By the way, I can add an openEHR tag to stack overflow if you think that would help things move forward (?) All the best Athanasios Anastasiou On 26/05/2015 08:00, Marcus Baw wrote: Good luck Thomas, I hope this works and I have added my support, although there was a move recently to create an umbrella Health IT StackExchange and it didn't attract enough support (despite being widely advertised) to trigger its promotion out of Area51 and into StackExchange. If your openEHR StackExchange doesn't get promoted however, there is an option to host your own StackExchangeClone site, I looked into this for a customer recently, one of the best clones is: https://github.com/ialbert/biostar-central M On 25 May 2015 at 11:58, Thomas Beale thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com mailto:thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com wrote: On 25/05/2015 11:00, Diego Boscá wrote: Agree with both. Probably we should go review the mailing lists to identify which kind of questions are usually asked by newcomers. Also, we should use stackoverflow more, with dedicated tags to openEHR. I created a new site proposal for openEHR on StackExchange http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/87508/openehr?referrer=w4Wq6VpjyxQPC4BojQudOA2- I'm not quite sure how this works, but I think if it gets visited by a lot of people, that helps it get created? So please visit the link! - thomas ___ openEHR-clinical mailing list openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org mailto:openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-clinical mailing list openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange
I think so! You can add tags to questions that are not yours? Probably the ideal should be to have openEHR tags in all the already asked questions. 2015-05-26 12:26 GMT+02:00 Athanasios Anastasiou a.anastas...@swansea.ac.uk: Hello everyone This is great news for openEHR but at the moment, the link between the specification and the implementation is not clear enough and the volume of questions might be low. The majority of questions in the technical list up until 2013 were regarding modelling and specification changes / clarifications. There are many more technical questions, concerning implementation, lately that could attract questions on which option works better than others in a specific setting. As a simplistic comparison, UML and modelling related questions are lumped under stack overflow currently. I think that hosting our own StackExchange type of website might work better at this point. By the way, I can add an openEHR tag to stack overflow if you think that would help things move forward (?) All the best Athanasios Anastasiou On 26/05/2015 08:00, Marcus Baw wrote: Good luck Thomas, I hope this works and I have added my support, although there was a move recently to create an umbrella Health IT StackExchange and it didn't attract enough support (despite being widely advertised) to trigger its promotion out of Area51 and into StackExchange. If your openEHR StackExchange doesn't get promoted however, there is an option to host your own StackExchangeClone site, I looked into this for a customer recently, one of the best clones is: https://github.com/ialbert/biostar-central M On 25 May 2015 at 11:58, Thomas Beale thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com mailto:thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com wrote: On 25/05/2015 11:00, Diego Boscá wrote: Agree with both. Probably we should go review the mailing lists to identify which kind of questions are usually asked by newcomers. Also, we should use stackoverflow more, with dedicated tags to openEHR. I created a new site proposal for openEHR on StackExchange http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/87508/openehr?referrer=w4Wq6VpjyxQPC4BojQudOA2- I'm not quite sure how this works, but I think if it gets visited by a lot of people, that helps it get created? So please visit the link! - thomas ___ openEHR-clinical mailing list openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org mailto:openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-clinical mailing list openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-clinical mailing list openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange
I would assume it can be both: a question could be just about specs (just the openEHR tag) or about any specific implementation (e.g. openEHR and java) 2015-05-25 13:13 GMT+02:00 Duarte Ferreira dferre...@fe.up.pt: Hi, It also needs questions to move to the commit phase. Is this tag also intended for questions related to implementations (java-libs) or just on abstract questions about the spec? Best, Duarte Ferreira From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale Sent: 25 May 2015 11:59 To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org; For openEHR clinical discussions Subject: openEHR @ StackExchange On 25/05/2015 11:00, Diego Boscá wrote: Agree with both. Probably we should go review the mailing lists to identify which kind of questions are usually asked by newcomers. Also, we should use stackoverflow more, with dedicated tags to openEHR. I created a new site proposal for openEHR on StackExchange - I'm not quite sure how this works, but I think if it gets visited by a lot of people, that helps it get created? So please visit the link! - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
RE: openEHR @ StackExchange
Hi, It also needs questions to move to the commit phase. Is this tag also intended for questions related to implementations (java-libs) or just on abstract questions about the spec? Best, Duarte Ferreira From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale Sent: 25 May 2015 11:59 To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org; For openEHR clinical discussions Subject: openEHR @ StackExchange On 25/05/2015 11:00, Diego Boscá wrote: Agree with both. Probably we should go review the mailing lists to identify which kind of questions are usually asked by newcomers. Also, we should use stackoverflow more, with dedicated tags to openEHR. I created a new site proposal for openEHR on StackExchange http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/87508/openehr?referrer=w4Wq6Vpjyx QPC4BojQudOA2 - I'm not quite sure how this works, but I think if it gets visited by a lot of people, that helps it get created? So please visit the link! - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: openEHR @ StackExchange
On 25/05/2015 12:16, Diego Boscá wrote: I would assume it can be both: a question could be just about specs (just the openEHR tag) or about any specific implementation (e.g. openEHR and java) yep - that's how I think it would work. - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
RE: openEHR @ StackExchange
One needs at least 1500 reputations to introduce a new tag (obviously openEHR doesn't exist yet). Cheers, -koray -Original Message- From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale Sent: Monday, 25 May 2015 11:41 p.m. To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org; For openEHR clinical discussions Subject: Re: openEHR @ StackExchange On 25/05/2015 12:16, Diego Boscá wrote: I would assume it can be both: a question could be just about specs (just the openEHR tag) or about any specific implementation (e.g. openEHR and java) yep - that's how I think it would work. - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
