Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
On 08/03/2012 07:19 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Radu Moisan, In message 1343997523-4117-1-git-send-email-radu.moi...@intel.com you wrote: Building u-boot requires UBOOT_MACHINE. In the u-boot README file building u-boot is achieved with make NAME_config and then make all. I assumend UBOOT_MACHINE to be the NAME part and thus, Actually a plain make NAME does the same as make NAME_config make all. You might also consider running ./MAKEALL NAME instead, which aut-adjusts to te number of available cores on the build host, so you get somewhat reduced build times. I've tried to build this way but got into some errors and did not pursued further in debugging them. However, because UBOOT_MACHINE is already used as NAME_config, would be difficult to change it to NAME and ask everyone who use it, to switch. I will go with current configuration make NAME_config make all radu ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
Dear Radu, In message 501f63ff.1070...@intel.com you wrote: Actually a plain make NAME does the same as make NAME_config make all. You might also consider running ./MAKEALL NAME instead, which aut-adjusts to te number of available cores on the build host, so you get somewhat reduced build times. I've tried to build this way but got into some errors and did not pursued further in debugging them. However, because UBOOT_MACHINE is Could you please tell me exactly what these errors were? Log files etc. highly appreciated... Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de If programming was easy, they wouldn't need something as complicated as a human being to do it, now would they? - L. Wall R. L. Schwartz, _Programming Perl_ ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
I may be recipe configuration, however, here are my steps: bitbake u-boot -c cleanall bitbake u-boot -c fetch bitbake -c devshell u-boot in the new shell make coreboot-x86 (without _config) The output I got is as follows: Configuring for coreboot-x86 - Board: coreboot, Options: SYS_TEXT_BASE=0xFC make /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found basename: missing operand Try `basename --help' for more information. make[1]: Entering directory `/home/radu/Documents/Development/yocto/build/tmp/work/qemux86-poky-linux/u-boot-2012.07-r0/git' /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found basename: missing operand Try `basename --help' for more information. /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found basename: missing operand Try `basename --help' for more information. Generating include/autoconf.mk /bin/bash: line 3: i386-linux-gcc: command not found /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found basename: missing operand Try `basename --help' for more information. /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found basename: missing operand Try `basename --help' for more information. Generating include/autoconf.mk.dep /bin/bash: line 3: i386-linux-gcc: command not found make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/radu/Documents/Development/yocto/build/tmp/work/qemux86-poky-linux/u-boot-2012.07-r0/git' /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found basename: missing operand Try `basename --help' for more information. make[1]: Entering directory `/home/radu/Documents/Development/yocto/build/tmp/work/qemux86-poky-linux/u-boot-2012.07-r0/git' /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found basename: missing operand Try `basename --help' for more information. /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found basename: missing operand Try `basename --help' for more information. /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found /bin/bash: i386-linux-ld: command not found /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found basename: missing operand Try `basename --help' for more information. /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found basename: missing operand Try `basename --help' for more information. /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found basename: missing operand Try `basename --help' for more information. /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found basename: missing operand Try `basename --help' for more information. i386-linux-gcc -DDO_DEPS_ONLY \ -g -Os -ffunction-sections -fvisibility=hidden -D__KERNEL__ -I/home/radu/Documents/Development/yocto/build/tmp/work/qemux86-poky-linux/u-boot-2012.07-r0/git/include -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -nostdinc -isystem -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wstrict-prototypes -mregparm=3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffreestanding -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-stack-protector -fno-dwarf2-cfi-asm -DREALMODE_BASE=0x7c0 -DCONFIG_X86 -D__I386__ -march=i386 -Werror -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fno-stack-protector \ -o lib/asm-offsets.s lib/asm-offsets.c -c -S /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found make[1]: *** [lib/asm-offsets.s] Error 127 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/radu/Documents/Development/yocto/build/tmp/work/qemux86-poky-linux/u-boot-2012.07-r0/git' make: *** [coreboot-x86] Error 2 However this is the same out as when I do make coreboot-x86_config make all This happens only when I'm trying to build inside the devshell, which lead me to believe that maybe the environment is not set completely, until at do_compile. radu On 08/06/2012 10:45 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Radu, In message 501f63ff.1070...@intel.com you wrote: Actually a plain make NAME does the same as make NAME_config make all. You might also consider running ./MAKEALL NAME instead, which aut-adjusts to te number of available cores on the build host, so you get somewhat reduced build times. I've tried to build this way but got into some errors and did not pursued further in debugging them. However, because UBOOT_MACHINE is Could you please tell me exactly what these errors were? Log files etc. highly appreciated... Best regards, Wolfgang Denk ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
Dear Radu, In message 501fc96a.8000...@intel.com you wrote: in the new shell make coreboot-x86 (without _config) The output I got is as follows: Configuring for coreboot-x86 - Board: coreboot, Options: SYS_TEXT_BASE=0xFC make /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found It seems CROSS_COMPILE is set to i386-linux-, but i386-linux-gcc is not anywhere in your PATH. Please check your PATH and fix it. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Advice is seldom welcome; and those who want it the most always like it the least. -- Philip Earl of Chesterfield ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
CROSS_COMPILE is set in EXTRA_OEMAKE which is used in oe-runmake() within do_compile() Running devshell is achieved in do_devshell() which is run after do_patch() but before do_compile(), that's why in devshell CROSS_COMPILE is not (yet) set. I think this is the intended way for things to work, devshell usage, as I see it, is mainly for pre-compile debugging purposes. radu On 08/06/2012 04:46 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Radu, In message 501fc96a.8000...@intel.com you wrote: in the new shell make coreboot-x86 (without _config) The output I got is as follows: Configuring for coreboot-x86 - Board: coreboot, Options: SYS_TEXT_BASE=0xFC make /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found /bin/bash: i386-linux-gcc: command not found It seems CROSS_COMPILE is set to i386-linux-, but i386-linux-gcc is not anywhere in your PATH. Please check your PATH and fix it. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
Dear Radu, In message 501fd013.5040...@intel.com you wrote: CROSS_COMPILE is set in EXTRA_OEMAKE which is used in oe-runmake() within do_compile() Running devshell is achieved in do_devshell() which is run after do_patch() but before do_compile(), that's why in devshell CROSS_COMPILE is not (yet) set. But CROSS_COMPILE _is_ set (and apparently has the value i386-linux-. The problem is that PATH is not set such that it contains any such file as i386-linux-gcc. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. - Donald Knuth ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote: Dear Radu, In message 501fd013.5040...@intel.com you wrote: CROSS_COMPILE is set in EXTRA_OEMAKE which is used in oe-runmake() within do_compile() Running devshell is achieved in do_devshell() which is run after do_patch() but before do_compile(), that's why in devshell CROSS_COMPILE is not (yet) set. But CROSS_COMPILE _is_ set (and apparently has the value i386-linux-. The problem is that PATH is not set such that it contains any such file as i386-linux-gcc. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. - Donald Knuth ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core Hi Wolfgang If the fix proposed here http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-August/129828.html is accepted into u-boot then we wont need these glues. ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
I meant, set with the correct value. i386-linux- is preloaded into CROSS_COMPILE and then at do_compile() gcc is appended to it. Is there in interest, to actually build u-boot in devshell? Radu On 08/06/2012 05:13 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Radu, In message 501fd013.5040...@intel.com you wrote: CROSS_COMPILE is set in EXTRA_OEMAKE which is used in oe-runmake() within do_compile() Running devshell is achieved in do_devshell() which is run after do_patch() but before do_compile(), that's why in devshell CROSS_COMPILE is not (yet) set. But CROSS_COMPILE _is_ set (and apparently has the value i386-linux-. The problem is that PATH is not set such that it contains any such file as i386-linux-gcc. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 03:38:42PM +0300, Radu Moisan wrote:
Building u-boot requires UBOOT_MACHINE. In the u-boot README file
building u-boot is achieved with make NAME_config and then
make all. I assumend UBOOT_MACHINE to be the NAME part and thus,
the _config addition in u-boot.inc
NAME is the machine name, and choices area vailable in boards.conf,
I used for testing coreboot-x86.
From this description I don't see why _config is now appended when
probably all BSPs had it included in UBOOT_MACHINE variable before
meta-nokia/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_git.bb:UBOOT_MACHINE_nokia900 =
nokia_rx51_config
meta-openmoko/conf/machine/om-gta04.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = omap3_gta04_config
meta-openmoko/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_git.bb:UBOOT_MACHINE_om-gta04 =
omap3_gta04_config
conf/machine/am180x-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = da850evm_config
conf/machine/am335x-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = am335x_evm_config
conf/machine/am3517-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = am3517_evm_config
conf/machine/am37x-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = omap3_evm_config
conf/machine/beagleboard.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = omap3_beagle_config
conf/machine/beaglebone.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = am335x_evm_config
conf/machine/hawkboard.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = da850_omapl138_evm_config
conf/machine/include/davinci.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE = davinci_dvevm_config
conf/machine/include/ti814x.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE = ti8148_evm_config_nand
conf/machine/include/ti816x.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE = ti8168_evm_config
conf/machine/omap3-touchbook.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = omap3_beagle_config
conf/machine/omap3evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = omap3_evm_config
conf/machine/pandaboard.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = omap4_panda_config
And any sensible is to append it to *MACHINE* variable as default:
recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE ?= ${MACHINE}_config
Cheers,
For u-boot-fw-utils fw_enc.c was changed and it requires a header
file config.h which is autogenerated at config so it requires a
make NAME_config.
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
...ls_2012.04.01.bb = u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb} |7 ---
...age_2012.04.01.bb = u-boot-mkimage_2012.07.bb} |6 +++---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc |2 +-
.../{u-boot_2012.04.01.bb = u-boot_2012.07.bb}|8
4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2012.04.01.bb =
u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb} (83%)
rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2012.04.01.bb =
u-boot-mkimage_2012.07.bb} (84%)
rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2012.04.01.bb = u-boot_2012.07.bb}
(82%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.04.01.bb
b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb
similarity index 83%
rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.04.01.bb
rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb
index fe3422a..2fa3b71 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.04.01.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb
@@ -9,12 +9,12 @@ DEPENDS = mtd-utils
# make it default
DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = -1
-# This revision corresponds to the tag v2012.04.01
+# This revision corresponds to the tag v2012.07
# We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the
# repo during parse
-SRCREV = 415d386877df49eb051b85ef74fa59a16dc17c7d
+SRCREV = 190649fb4309d1bc0fe7732fd0f951cb6440f935
-PV = v2012.04.01+git${SRCPV}
+PV = 2012.07
SRC_URI = git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git;branch=master;protocol=git
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ S = ${WORKDIR}/git
EXTRA_OEMAKE = 'HOSTCC=${CC}'
do_compile () {
+ oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MACHINE}_config
oe_runmake env
}
diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.04.01.bb
b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.07.bb
similarity index 84%
rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.04.01.bb
rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.07.bb
index aa107fe..752efcb 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.04.01.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2012.07.bb
@@ -7,12 +7,12 @@ SECTION = bootloader
# make it default
DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = -1
-# This revision corresponds to the tag v2012.04.01
+# This revision corresponds to the tag v2012.07
# We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the
# repo during parse
-SRCREV = 415d386877df49eb051b85ef74fa59a16dc17c7d
+SRCREV = 190649fb4309d1bc0fe7732fd0f951cb6440f935
-PV = v2012.04.01+git${SRCPV}
+PV = 2012.07
SRC_URI = git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git;branch=master;protocol=git
diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
index 42bdde9..58a8192 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ do_compile () {
unset LDFLAGS
unset CFLAGS
unset CPPFLAGS
- oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MACHINE}
+ oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MACHINE}_config
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
On 08/03/2012 03:46 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 03:38:42PM +0300, Radu Moisan wrote:
Building u-boot requires UBOOT_MACHINE. In the u-boot README file
building u-boot is achieved with make NAME_config and then
make all. I assumend UBOOT_MACHINE to be the NAME part and thus,
the _config addition in u-boot.inc
NAME is the machine name, and choices area vailable in boards.conf,
I used for testing coreboot-x86.
From this description I don't see why _config is now appended when
probably all BSPs had it included in UBOOT_MACHINE variable before
meta-nokia/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_git.bb:UBOOT_MACHINE_nokia900 =
nokia_rx51_config
meta-openmoko/conf/machine/om-gta04.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = omap3_gta04_config
meta-openmoko/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_git.bb:UBOOT_MACHINE_om-gta04 =
omap3_gta04_config
conf/machine/am180x-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = da850evm_config
conf/machine/am335x-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = am335x_evm_config
conf/machine/am3517-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = am3517_evm_config
conf/machine/am37x-evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = omap3_evm_config
conf/machine/beagleboard.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = omap3_beagle_config
conf/machine/beaglebone.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = am335x_evm_config
conf/machine/hawkboard.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = da850_omapl138_evm_config
conf/machine/include/davinci.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE = davinci_dvevm_config
conf/machine/include/ti814x.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE = ti8148_evm_config_nand
conf/machine/include/ti816x.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE = ti8168_evm_config
conf/machine/omap3-touchbook.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = omap3_beagle_config
conf/machine/omap3evm.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = omap3_evm_config
conf/machine/pandaboard.conf:UBOOT_MACHINE = omap4_panda_config
And any sensible is to append it to *MACHINE* variable as default:
recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc:UBOOT_MACHINE ?= ${MACHINE}_config
Cheers,
Ok, missed that, I'll fix it.
radu
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] u-boot: Upgrade to upstream stable 2012.07
Dear Radu Moisan, In message 1343997523-4117-1-git-send-email-radu.moi...@intel.com you wrote: Building u-boot requires UBOOT_MACHINE. In the u-boot README file building u-boot is achieved with make NAME_config and then make all. I assumend UBOOT_MACHINE to be the NAME part and thus, Actually a plain make NAME does the same as make NAME_config make all. You might also consider running ./MAKEALL NAME instead, which aut-adjusts to te number of available cores on the build host, so you get somewhat reduced build times. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de An Elephant is a mouse with an Operating System. - Knuth ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
