Re: [opensc-devel] state of the project?
Le 17/11/2012 17:40, Ludovic Rousseau a écrit : > 2012/11/17 Ludovic Rousseau : >> 2012/11/17 Andreas Jellinghaus >>> SF is sourceforge.net I guess? it still has the opensc project (that >>> was used many, many years ago). >>> Owners are juha and olaf - if you can reach them, you can re-activate it. >> I just sent a email to Olaf and Juha. I hope they still read the >> emails sent to their SF.net contact address. > That was fast. > Juha added me as admin. > > It would be best if other active people are also added as admin. > Viktor, do you have a SourceForge account? Have created one: 'tarvik' > BYe > ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
Re: [opensc-devel] state of the project?
Le 16/11/2012 22:46, Peter Stuge a écrit : > Viktor Tarasov wrote: >> Do you mean that with sources on github it would be more useful to >> use the bug system and wiki on github, as Ludovic proposed, >> and not the Trac installed on someone's platform ? > I don't know how well github issues and wiki integrate with repos - > what I've seen isn't too convincing. :\ Ok, thanks. > Trac somewhere else will not automatically know what happens in > repositories on github. I don't know if github can be told to push > out events to somewhere else. Worst case it is of course possible to > poll github for changes, but that's not really nice. Github has system of hooks. For example, currently in OpenSC/OpenSC github project there is the hook to run the Jenkins builds -- no need to poll repository on the Jenkins's side. There is also a 'Trac' dedicated github service hook. As for me, we have to migrate as much as possible to the 'public' services. Sources are already there, wiki can be easily (?) migrated to the github, mailing list will go (without archive ?) to SourceForge, or, in case of the last minute obstacles, to groups.google.com. The resting are CI and Trac. CI is already running on the dedicated platform, Trac could also be placed there. > //Peter Kind wishes, Viktor. ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
Re: [opensc-devel] state of the project?
Le 17/11/2012 22:57, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit : > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Ludovic Rousseau > wrote: >> 2012/11/17 Alon Bar-Lev : >>> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Ludovic Rousseau >>> wrote: 2012/11/17 Alon Bar-Lev : > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Ludovic Rousseau > wrote: >> 2012/11/16 Alon Bar-Lev >>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Alon Bar-Lev >>> wrote: On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > > 2012/11/14 Ludovic Rousseau >> I could not migrate: >> - pkcs11-help. Something fails in the authors names conversion > > I forked the github repository of Alon. pkcs11-helper is now available > under the OpenSC organization. > https://github.com/OpenSC/pkcs11-helper > >> I have not tried to migrate: >> - OpenCT >> - OpenSC-Java >> Aren't these projects obsolete now? > > I tried to convert OpenCT. > But I could not get the author correspondence. Some SVN revisions have > no author and confuse svn2git. I will prepare github for you to use. >>> Ready: >>> https://github.com/alonbl/openct >> >> Forked at https://github.com/OpenSC/openct > No... it should not be forked it should be entire clone. > From this one I should fork mine if I work on openct. > Same for other projects opensc repos should be the master as they > are formal upstream. OK. I deleted openct and pkcs11-helper to recreate them. You can now fork them on your side. >>> Thanks. >>> It would be lovely if you give me admin access to both of these. >> I don't think I can give you admin access to only these 2 projects. >> I can add you as a member of the OpenSC organisation and you would >> have access to all the repositories. > Yes you can, there are teams, each team can have admin/write/read > access to specific repositories. >> The idea of git is to _not_ have to give access. Just send pull >> requests and I (or another admin) will pull your code. > We return to the original question: what is the difference between > people who previously had commit access and you. Two current members will no be able consciously coordinate all OpenSC github projects. We need largely expand the number of organization members. IMHO, it has to be automatic for those who have had previously the commit access. As far as I see only 'Organization Owner' can do it. Martin, can you do it or add a one/couple of 'owners' that will be able to add a new 'members' ? Kind regards, Viktor. ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
Re: [opensc-devel] state of the project?
2012/11/18 Viktor Tarasov : > mailing list will go (without archive ?) to SourceForge, or, in case of the > last minute obstacles, to groups.google.com. The numbers of members to the 3 lists hosted at opensc-project.org are: 546 opensc-devel_members.txt 129 opensc-announce_members.txt 39 opensc-commits_members.txt I created 3 mailing lists at SourceForge OpenSC project https://sourceforge.net/p/opensc/mailman/ It looks like it is possible to mass subscribe to a mailman list [1]. But I could not find how using the SourceForge list interface. Maybe the only (and good) solution is to ask people to subscribe at SourceForge. Bye [1] http://wiki.list.org/display/DOC/How+can+I+Mass+Subscribe+a+list+with+real+names -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
Re: [opensc-devel] state of the project?
Am 17.11.2012 22:54, schrieb Ludovic Rousseau: > 2012/11/17 Alon Bar-Lev : >> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Ludovic Rousseau >> wrote: >>> 2012/11/17 Alon Bar-Lev : On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > 2012/11/16 Alon Bar-Lev >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Alon Bar-Lev >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Ludovic Rousseau >>> wrote: 2012/11/14 Ludovic Rousseau > I could not migrate: > - pkcs11-help. Something fails in the authors names conversion I forked the github repository of Alon. pkcs11-helper is now available under the OpenSC organization. https://github.com/OpenSC/pkcs11-helper > I have not tried to migrate: > - OpenCT > - OpenSC-Java > Aren't these projects obsolete now? I tried to convert OpenCT. But I could not get the author correspondence. Some SVN revisions have no author and confuse svn2git. >>> I will prepare github for you to use. >> Ready: >> https://github.com/alonbl/openct > > Forked at https://github.com/OpenSC/openct No... it should not be forked it should be entire clone. From this one I should fork mine if I work on openct. Same for other projects opensc repos should be the master as they are formal upstream. >>> OK. I deleted openct and pkcs11-helper to recreate them. >>> You can now fork them on your side. >> Thanks. >> It would be lovely if you give me admin access to both of these. > I don't think I can give you admin access to only these 2 projects. > I can add you as a member of the OpenSC organisation and you would > have access to all the repositories. > > The idea of git is to _not_ have to give access. Just send pull > requests and I (or another admin) will pull your code. > > Same remark for Andreas and the OpenSC-java repository. > > Or am I wrong? > > Bye > O.K. So I notify you of new pull requests ? My point is, that I offer to do the integration on opensc-java (as I already had commit rights to the old repository). Andreas -- -CardContact Software & System Consulting |.##> <##.| Andreas Schwier |# #| Schülerweg 38 |# #| 32429 Minden, Germany |'##> <##'| Phone +49 571 56149 -http://www.cardcontact.de http://www.tscons.de http://www.openscdp.org ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
