[osol-discuss] Suspend to RAM!!!
> The one big deterrent discouraging laptop users to > use OpenSolaris is the lack of the suspend-to-ram > feature. CORRECTION! THIS STATEMENT IS NO LONGER TRUE! SUSPEND-TO-RAM WORKS ON MY NOTEBOOK AS OF BUILD 98! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Suspend to RAM!!!
> The one big deterrent discouraging laptop users to > use OpenSolaris is the lack of the suspend-to-ram > feature. CORRECTION! THIS STATEMENT IS NO LONGER TRUE! SUSPEND-TO-RAM WORKS ON MY NOTEBOOK AS OF BUILD 98! > Ed.: I am doing this on an HP dv6928us notebook which > is an Intel core2duo system with 3GB/250GB memory. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Interesting => MAC addr reversing manually solved the problem !!
onkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi All , > I was not able to ping the router at my home from opensolaris box. > > see -> http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=77102&tstart=0 > > I did this => > > ifconfig nge0 ether < MAC addr reversed > > ifconfig nge0 dhcp start > > not I am able to ping 192.168.1.1 (router ) > > but , I am not able to ping www.google.com > > can anyone help me with this ? > > Please ! IIRC the mac address reversal bug was fixed long ago. b86 that you are running is quite old ( (99 - 86) * 2 ~= 26 weeks ). A fixed version would not require the ifconfig ether hack. Pinging remote hosts is likely a routing or firewall problem. Check your default router (netstat -rn and /etc/defaultrouter) and verify that the route in the reverse direction works. As a tip, I'd suggest that saying "I am not able to ping" is unhelpful. What actually happens? What error do you see, or is it none? Does it take a long time? etc. etc. http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#beprecise Boyd ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] network configuration problem
Ghee Teo wrote: > The new network admin GUI is all integrated to work to its full > functionality in snv 100 > as far as I heard. What exactly does that mean? The perfectly functional version in older releases was replaced with a new partially functional version? I am *so* sorry I upgrade to snv_98... ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] network configuration problem
James Carlson wrote: > Bill Shannon writes: >> I disabled svc:/network/physical:nwam and enabled >> svc:/network/physical:default. I went to System > Administration > >> Network. It doesn't show *any* interfaces. > > I'd recommend contacting the Desktop community. They're the ones who > support the GUI bits. > > I can't say I use them much myself. This was a problem 15 years ago when I left the OS group and I see it's still a problem today. You OS guys need to understand that most people experience desktop systems through the GUI. If the GUI for *your* feature doesn't work, it's the same as your feature not working. Let the flaming begin! >> I rebooted. No help. > > I suggest diagnosing the problem before going through repeated > reboots. The system is meant to be deterministic: if you've got a > problem now, you'll very likely still have that problem after a > reboot. Yes, most of the time that's true. But I learned long ago that it's better to reboot than to spend hours and hours trying to diagnose such problems. >> ifconfig -a looks fine, but there's no default route. > > What does "looks fine" mean? Please provide the command output. You know, UP, correct IP address, etc. It's working. Really. > What does "dladm show-link" say? $ dladm show-link LINKCLASSMTUSTATEOVER iprb0 phys 1500 up -- Normal, right? >> Ok, I can do "route add default 192.168.1.1" and now I have a default route. > > Do this: > > # echo 192.168.1.1 > /etc/defaultrouter Yes, I forgot to mention that I knew how to do that too. >> But I can't lookup internet addresses, so I copy nsswitch.dns to >> nsswitch.conf and that works. > > You'll also want to set up /etc/resolv.conf. It had already been set up, probably by NWAM. >> But I'm putting all this together by hand, and I never had to do this on >> any of the other OpenSolaris machines I've installed. Why isn't the >> Network admin GUI working to allow me to configure the network? > > No idea; contact the desktop group. Will do. > As for the complexity, this is why we strongly recommend using DHCP > for configuration. That's what it's designed to do, and it makes > things much simpler. Kind of sucks for an NFS server to change its IP address on every reboot. Yes, I know, with sufficient cleverness and control over the DHCP server, I can get it to hand out the same IP address every time. I find it's actually easier to configure the server itself. And it's worked on all previous OpenSolaris releases I've used. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] xfce 4.4.2 builds?
I'm using XFCE 4.4.2 on my SNV_98 box, the space rq. for the build system really isn't that much: Compiler: (torez:~/dtbld) houst0n > du -hs /opt/studio/SUNWspro11/ 384M /opt/studio/SUNWspro11 dtbld: (torez:~/dtbld) houst0n > du -hs /opt/dtbld 33M /opt/dtbld Then just the source + obj files and finally the pkgs, which can't be over 200mb, xfce is tiny. Delete staroffice? ;) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Help: How to install Java SE and use Java Web Start..
>Workaround would be to save the SDM starter somewhere to your local hard drive (i.e. on the Desktop which is Firefox default I assume) and invoke it from some terminal Or, alternatively, set Firefox to use javaws for that file type: http://blogs.sun.com/observatory/entry/java_web_start HTH, Gregg Kristian Rink wrote: Tai; Tai schrieb: I am newbie to Solaris and OpenSolaris. I hope someone can help me out or give me a insight on how it works. I install OpenSolaris through the LiveCD. It was great, most common tasks works. However, I need to run Sun Download Manager (SDM), and it requires Java SE. Java SE indeed should be installed on your system after using the OpenSolaris Live medium for installation. However as far as I know, starting Java Web Start applications (.jnlp files) from within Firefox browser doesn't so far work out of the box. Workaround would be to save the SDM starter somewhere to your local hard drive (i.e. on the Desktop which is Firefox default I assume) and invoke it from some terminal using javaws Desktop/.jnlp ; it should work this way... Cheers, Kristian ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [networking-discuss] please help => network configuration !!
> Thanks, Juergen. I'll give that a try on my MCP61 and MCP67 systems. It would > be > nice to put those Intel NICs back into the parts box. It surely did work. Thanks again! [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ifconfig nge0 nge0: flags=201000843 mtu 1500 index 2 inet 192.168.0.5 netmask ff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping yahoo.com yahoo.com is alive -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [networking-discuss] please help => network configuration !!
> On one box (ASUS M2N-VM DVI) I had to workaround bug 6678904 > ( http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6678904 ), > by manually setting the MAC address: Thanks, Juergen. I'll give that a try on my MCP61 and MCP67 systems. It would be nice to put those Intel NICs back into the parts box. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [networking-discuss] please help => network configuration !!
> If that is the built-in Ethernet controller on an nVidia MCP chipset you are > *never* > going to make it work with either OpenSolaris or Solaris Express. In 2 of 3 cases the built-in Ethernet controller on an nVidia MCP chipset works for me (ASUS M2N-SLI deluxe and M2NPV-VM). On one box (ASUS M2N-VM DVI) I had to workaround bug 6678904 ( http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6678904 ), by manually setting the MAC address: % cat /etc/hostname.nge0 192.168.1.23 ether 0:1d:60:b:18:1b -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] OpenSolaris Community Newsletter September 2008
The September 2008 Community Newsletter has moved back to opensolaris.org. After a few months of living on genunix, we decided to bring it back in house. Take a peek and enjoy! http://opensolaris.org/os/community/advocacy/newsletter/sept08/ -Linda ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Interesting => MAC addr reversing manually solved the problem !!
onkar writes: > ifconfig nge0 ether < MAC addr reversed > > ifconfig nge0 dhcp start > > not I am able to ping 192.168.1.1 (router ) That's pretty scary. You might want to update that software. > but , I am not able to ping www.google.com That sounds like a DNS configuration error. Do you have 'hosts' and 'ipnodes' set to 'files dns' in /etc/nsswitch.conf? If not, then do this: # cp /etc/nsswitch.dns /etc/nsswitch.conf Do you have DNS server addresses from your ISP configured in /etc/resolv.conf? If not, then you'll need to do that. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Interesting => MAC addr reversing manually solved the problem !!
Hi All , I was not able to ping the router at my home from opensolaris box. see -> http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=77102&tstart=0 I did this => ifconfig nge0 ether < MAC addr reversed > ifconfig nge0 dhcp start not I am able to ping 192.168.1.1 (router ) but , I am not able to ping www.google.com can anyone help me with this ? Please ! -Onkar -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [networking-discuss] please help => network configuration !!
onkar wrote: > sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? > 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for NLB_001[0], Success > sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? > 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for NLB_001[0], Success > sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? > 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for NLB_001[0], Success > 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for MP_001[1a], Success > sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? > 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for MP_001[1a], Success > sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? > 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for MP_001[1a], Success > sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? > 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for MP_001[0], Success > 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for MP_001[0], Success > sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? > 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for MP_001[0], Success > sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? > 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for MP_001[1a], Success Well, you're seeing broadcast traffic from 192.168.1.2, which is not you, so you must have a live connection to the network. You're not seeing ARP responses though so I'd say that 192.168.1.1 is simply not there. Paul ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] unix file encryption
> gpg : Will this work in windows and i am guessing there is a Sun and AIX > client you can install. Ill do a search on it. > gpg will definitely run on Windows and Solaris, not sure about AIX, but it'd imagine so. Cheers, Andrew. -- . __/_/_ w: http://darq.com/ . __/_/_ t: 020 7100 1447 . / / e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [networking-discuss] please help => network configuration !!
> nge0: flags=201000843 mtu 1500 index 2 > inet 192.168.1.17 netmask ff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 If that is the built-in Ethernet controller on an nVidia MCP chipset you are *never* going to make it work with either OpenSolaris or Solaris Express. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [networking-discuss] please help => network configuration !!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# snoop -d nge0 Using device nge0 (promiscuous mode) 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for SMS_SLP[1a], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for SMS_SLP[1a], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for SMS_SLP[1a], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for SMS_SLP[0], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for SMS_SLP[0], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for SMS_SLP[0], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for SMS_SLP[1a], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for SMS_SLP[1a], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for SMS_SLP[1a], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for SMS_SLP[0], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for SMS_SLP[0], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for SMS_SLP[0], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for NLB_001[1a], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for NLB_001[1a], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for NLB_001[1a], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for NLB_001[0], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for NLB_001[0], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for NLB_001[0], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for NLB_001[1a], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for NLB_001[1a], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for NLB_001[1a], Success sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for NLB_001[0], Success sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for NLB_001[0], Success sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for NLB_001[0], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for MP_001[1a], Success sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for MP_001[1a], Success sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for MP_001[1a], Success sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for MP_001[0], Success 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for MP_001[0], Success sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for MP_001[0], Success sol1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.1 ? 192.168.1.2 -> 192.168.1.255 NBT NS Query Request for MP_001[1a], Success -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [networking-discuss] please help => network configuration !!
onkar writes: > # cat /etc/defaultrouter > 192.168.1.1 > # cat /etc/hostname.nge0 > 192.168.1.17 > > still I am not able to ping to 192.168.1.1 > > Waht else might be going wrong ? Try "ping -sn 192.168.1.1". What does "netstat -narv" report? What do you see in "ifconfig nge0"? Are you sure you've got the right netmask set? It's common to use the default here (/24), but if the other system has a different mask configured, then it might not be able to respond. Are there any errors? Examine the output from "kstat nge" ... there'll be a lot of it, but it should show error counters increasing if there are low-level problems. How old is the software you're using? There were serious problems with 'nge' quite some time ago -- bad enough that I gave up and plugged in an old 3c509 card (elxl) to work around it -- but I haven't seen them since about build 90. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [networking-discuss] please help => network configuration !!
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 06:36:01AM -0700, onkar wrote: > # cat /etc/defaultrouter > 192.168.1.1 > # cat /etc/hostname.nge0 > 192.168.1.17 > > still I am not able to ping to 192.168.1.1 Since (according to your ifconfig sent previously) the 192.168.1.1 is on your local segment, you don't need to set up "/etc/defaultrouter". You need it only in case you want to communicate from 192.168.1.17 out of the local (192.168.1.0/24) segment. > > Waht else might be going wrong ? Bad day? /j. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] unix file encryption
gpg : Will this work in windows and i am guessing there is a Sun and AIX client you can install. Ill do a search on it. Thanx for the info Message was edited by: unix1adm -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] unix file encryption
pgp says it works with windows only from what i could find on their www site -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] LU snv_97 -> snv_99 & fs/dcfs ?
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Last night I was LUing snv_97 to snv_99 (x86) and faced the system crash in >>> luupgrade phase cau sed >> by >>> mod_hold_stub: Couldn't load stub module fs/dcfs >>> >>> Indeed, (my?) snv_97 doesn't have it, and I had to copy it over from snv_99 >>> distribution to get th >> ings work. >>> I have access only to snv_87 and snv_97, both without dcfs module. Is that >>> something to watch out >> when using LU to snv_98+? >> >> >> Whenever you upgrade you MUST for install the current liveupgrade package. >> Run: Solaris_11/Tools/Installers/liveupgrade20 >> >> from the new release. > >Yes, that's right, of course, I just forget this step sometimes :-( > >As soon as it's the only reason, it's OK, then. Thanks, Casper! It's not a nice failure; the dcfs support was added to SPARC (boot archive) and the module wasn't shipped with x86 but the UFS changes to use it are in Solaris/x86. Note that unpacking and looking at the files in the miniroot will cause the same panic. (So don't do that until you have installed build 99 or add the dcfs module. Casper ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] LU snv_97 -> snv_99 & fs/dcfs ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Last night I was LUing snv_97 to snv_99 (x86) and faced the system crash in >> luupgrade phase caused > by >> mod_hold_stub: Couldn't load stub module fs/dcfs >> >> Indeed, (my?) snv_97 doesn't have it, and I had to copy it over from snv_99 >> distribution to get th > ings work. >> I have access only to snv_87 and snv_97, both without dcfs module. Is that >> something to watch out > when using LU to snv_98+? > > > Whenever you upgrade you MUST for install the current liveupgrade package. > Run: Solaris_11/Tools/Installers/liveupgrade20 > > from the new release. Yes, that's right, of course, I just forget this step sometimes :-( As soon as it's the only reason, it's OK, then. Thanks, Casper! -- /ynp ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [networking-discuss] please help => network configuration !!
# cat /etc/defaultrouter 192.168.1.1 # cat /etc/hostname.nge0 192.168.1.17 still I am not able to ping to 192.168.1.1 Waht else might be going wrong ? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] unix file encryption
Hiya, > Is there a way to encrypt a flat file or a database file so it can be ftp or > sftp to a remote windows system? > > this is for solaris/AIX etc. > > or is there a 3 party sw that can be used Depends how strong encryption you need. An easy option is to use a symmetric cypher with gnupg. To encrypt: gpg -c filename To decrypt: gpg filename Hope this helps, Andrew. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] smbfs on Solaris 10 5/08?
James; James Carlson schrieb: >> maybe a stupid question, but are there binary packages of the OpenSolaris >> CIFS/SMB client (smbutil and friends) available to those using Solaris 10 >> 5/08? So far, at the very least trying the packages off opensolaris.org >> failed for me... > > No, that won't work. We don't support that kind of compatibility. Thanks at first for clarifying that. :) > Another option would be to upgrade to Solaris Express Community > Edition. Okay, so as we're into evaluating the Solaris platform for our productive environment, this is the way I will go first and see how far it will get me. Thanks for the hint on that. Cheers & all the best, Kristian -- Kristian Rink cell: +49 176 2447 2771 business: http://www.planconnect.de personal: http://pictorial.zimmer428.net "we command the system. calling all recievers. we are noisy people for a better living". (covenant - "monochrome") ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] unix file encryption
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Cj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to encrypt a flat file or a database file so it can be ftp or > sftp to a remote windows system? > > this is for solaris/AIX etc. > > or is there a 3 party sw that can be used? PGP? ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] unix file encryption
Is there a way to encrypt a flat file or a database file so it can be ftp or sftp to a remote windows system? this is for solaris/AIX etc. or is there a 3 party sw that can be used? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] LU snv_97 -> snv_99 & fs/dcfs ?
>Last night I was LUing snv_97 to snv_99 (x86) and faced the system crash in >luupgrade phase caused by > >mod_hold_stub: Couldn't load stub module fs/dcfs > >Indeed, (my?) snv_97 doesn't have it, and I had to copy it over from snv_99 >distribution to get th ings work. > >I have access only to snv_87 and snv_97, both without dcfs module. Is that >something to watch out when using LU to snv_98+? Whenever you upgrade you MUST for install the current liveupgrade package. Run: Solaris_11/Tools/Installers/liveupgrade20 from the new release. Casper ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] LU snv_97 -> snv_99 & fs/dcfs ?
Last night I was LUing snv_97 to snv_99 (x86) and faced the system crash in luupgrade phase caused by mod_hold_stub: Couldn't load stub module fs/dcfs Indeed, (my?) snv_97 doesn't have it, and I had to copy it over from snv_99 distribution to get things work. I have access only to snv_87 and snv_97, both without dcfs module. Is that something to watch out when using LU to snv_98+? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] smbfs on Solaris 10 5/08?
Kristian Rink writes: > maybe a stupid question, but are there binary packages of the OpenSolaris > CIFS/SMB client (smbutil and friends) available to those using Solaris 10 > 5/08? So far, at the very least trying the packages off opensolaris.org > failed for me... No, that won't work. We don't support that kind of compatibility. There are two rules here that work against what you're asking for: 1. We support only backward compatibility. This means that a binary compiled on an old system (and that follows the ABI) will run on a new system. Binaries compiled on a newer system (OpenSolaris is newer than _any_ S10) cannot be run reliably on any older system. 2. System packages (those supplied by Sun as part of a Solaris release) are special. System packages cannot be run on anything other than the release with which they were distributed, because they are not necessarily ABI-compliant. They can't run on any newer or older system, even across Update releases. Since you're using Solaris 10, your best bet would be to contact your support representative and ask when (or if) a backport might be available. Another option would be to upgrade to Solaris Express Community Edition. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] network configuration problem
Bill Shannon writes: > I disabled svc:/network/physical:nwam and enabled > svc:/network/physical:default. I went to System > Administration > > Network. It doesn't show *any* interfaces. I'd recommend contacting the Desktop community. They're the ones who support the GUI bits. I can't say I use them much myself. > I rebooted. No help. I suggest diagnosing the problem before going through repeated reboots. The system is meant to be deterministic: if you've got a problem now, you'll very likely still have that problem after a reboot. > ifconfig -a looks fine, but there's no default route. What does "looks fine" mean? Please provide the command output. What does "dladm show-link" say? > Ok, I can do "route add default 192.168.1.1" and now I have a default route. Do this: # echo 192.168.1.1 > /etc/defaultrouter That will make sure that (on your next reboot) the system retains the default route you've specified. The "route" command generally just affects the running system. (The exception to that is the "-p" option.) > But I can't lookup internet addresses, so I copy nsswitch.dns to > nsswitch.conf and that works. You'll also want to set up /etc/resolv.conf. > But I'm putting all this together by hand, and I never had to do this on > any of the other OpenSolaris machines I've installed. Why isn't the > Network admin GUI working to allow me to configure the network? No idea; contact the desktop group. As for the complexity, this is why we strongly recommend using DHCP for configuration. That's what it's designed to do, and it makes things much simpler. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris equivalents for GNU packages
Alan Coopersmith writes: > > readline-5.0,REV=2005.06.07-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > > I don't see a package with libreadline in nv_98 It's been in limbo for some time now -- see PSARC 2007/188. The short answer is that Sun's lawyers seem to assert that GPL libraries (unlike GPL other executables) "must" go in a different path to protect delicate sensibilities, and the ARC members just as strongly disagree that the file system hierarchy ought to be used to document one company's licensing concerns. We're stuck, and it'd be good to be unstuck. For now, most folks are told either to bury a private copy (ick!) or use libtecla instead. > > libnet-1.0.2,REV=2004.04.08_rev=a-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > > I don't know what this is and don't see anything obvious > in nv_98. PSARC 2008/409. It's presumably on its way. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris equivalents for GNU packages
Are you wanting a /usr/local root level sfw environment at export/home profile or something?? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] smbfs on Solaris 10 5/08?
Folks; maybe a stupid question, but are there binary packages of the OpenSolaris CIFS/SMB client (smbutil and friends) available to those using Solaris 10 5/08? So far, at the very least trying the packages off opensolaris.org failed for me... TIA and best regards, Kristian -- Dipl.-Ing.(BA) Kristian Rink * Software- und Systemingenieur planConnect GmbH * Könneritzstr. 33 * 01067 Dresden fon: 0351 215 203 71 * cell: 0176 2447 2771 * mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Amtsgericht Dresden HRB: 20 015 * St.-Nr. FA DD I 201 / 116 / 05360 Geschäftsführer: Stefan Voß, Karl Stierstorfer ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] network configuration problem
Bill Shannon escribió: > I installed 2008.05 on a new machine, upgraded to snv_98. > Now I'm trying to convert to static IP. > > I disabled svc:/network/physical:nwam and enabled > svc:/network/physical:default. I went to System > Administration > > Network. It doesn't show *any* interfaces. > > Sigh. > > I rebooted. No help. > > I created /etc/hostname.iprb0 with my IP address. > > I rebooted. No help. > > ifconfig -a looks fine, but there's no default route. > Ok, I can do "route add default 192.168.1.1" and now I have a default route. > > But I can't lookup internet addresses, so I copy nsswitch.dns to > nsswitch.conf and that works. > > But I'm putting all this together by hand, and I never had to do this on > any of the other OpenSolaris machines I've installed. Why isn't the > Network admin GUI working to allow me to configure the network? > > ___ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Create the /etc/defaultrouter file. In that, put the IP address of the default router for your network. I do not like to much the GUI interface (any of them, :) ) and using console is quite straight to configure the network. Greetings. -- Miguel Da Silva Unidad de Recursos Informáticos Facultad de Ingeniería - http://www.fing.edu.uy Universidad de la República - http://www.rau.edu.uy ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [networking-discuss] please help => network configuration !!
Try `snoop -r -d nge0 host 192.168.1.17 icmp` during the ping to check, if you get some responses from the host on local network. If yes, check the firewall rules (ipfstat). If no, check the physical/link layer (`dladm show-dev`, `dladm show-link`) or overally the physical wiring. /j. On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 03:10:26AM -0700, onkar wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# netstat -rn > > Routing Table: IPv4 > Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface > - - -- - > 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.17 U 1 0 nge0 > 127.0.0.1127.0.0.1UH1314 lo0 > > Routing Table: IPv6 > Destination/MaskGateway Flags Ref UseIf > > --- --- - --- --- > - > ::1 ::1 UH 1 0 lo0 > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ifconfig -a > lo0: flags=2001000849 mtu 8232 > index 1 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00 > nge0: flags=201000843 mtu 1500 index > 2 > inet 192.168.1.17 netmask ff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > ether 81:ea:66:a0:1a:0 > lo0: flags=2002000849 mtu 8252 > index 1 > inet6 ::1/128 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > ___ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [networking-discuss] please help => network configuration !!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# netstat -rn Routing Table: IPv4 Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface - - -- - 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.17 U 1 0 nge0 127.0.0.1127.0.0.1UH1314 lo0 Routing Table: IPv6 Destination/MaskGateway Flags Ref UseIf --- --- - --- --- - ::1 ::1 UH 1 0 lo0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849 mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00 nge0: flags=201000843 mtu 1500 index 2 inet 192.168.1.17 netmask ff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 81:ea:66:a0:1a:0 lo0: flags=2002000849 mtu 8252 index 1 inet6 ::1/128 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [networking-discuss] please help => network configuration !!
>sol1:~# netstat -rn > >Routing Table: IPv4 > Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface > - - -- - >127.0.0.1127.0.0.1UH1 8 lo0 > >Routing Table: IPv6 > Destination/MaskGateway Flags Ref UseIf > >--- --- - --- --- >- >::1 ::1 UH 1 0 lo0 > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ifconfig -a >lo0: flags=2001000849 mtu 8232 >index 1 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00 >nge0: flags=201000842 mtu 1500 index 2 > inet 192.168.1.17 netmask ff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > ether 81:ea:66:a0:1a:0 >lo0: flags=2002000849 mtu 8252 >index 1 > inet6 ::1/128 > The nge0 interface is not "up". Casper ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] network configuration problem
The new network admin GUI is all integrated to work to its full functionality in snv 100 as far as I heard. -Ghee Bill Shannon wrote: > I installed 2008.05 on a new machine, upgraded to snv_98. > Now I'm trying to convert to static IP. > > I disabled svc:/network/physical:nwam and enabled > svc:/network/physical:default. I went to System > Administration > > Network. It doesn't show *any* interfaces. > > Sigh. > > I rebooted. No help. > > I created /etc/hostname.iprb0 with my IP address. > > I rebooted. No help. > > ifconfig -a looks fine, but there's no default route. > Ok, I can do "route add default 192.168.1.1" and now I have a default route. > > But I can't lookup internet addresses, so I copy nsswitch.dns to > nsswitch.conf and that works. > > But I'm putting all this together by hand, and I never had to do this on > any of the other OpenSolaris machines I've installed. Why isn't the > Network admin GUI working to allow me to configure the network? > > ___ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Problem on crypto card v1.1
I can't to use pktool genkey on sun crypto card v1.1 When I input pin of keystore, it show error: keystore error: CKR_PIN_INCORRECT libkmf error: KMF_ERR_AUTH_FAILED format of my input is : : And if I need to downgrade to v1.0, how I can do that? I try to re-install driver 1.0 but it not work, it need to re-firmware too. But I don't know how to do that. Thanks -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
