Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

2016-05-04 Thread Monty Taylor 

On 05/04/2016 08:07 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:

On 05/04/2016 02:44 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:

Dmitry Tantsur wrote:

On 05/02/2016 08:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote:

When will we name the P release of OpenStack?  We named two releases
simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle.
This
gave us the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata)
releases.

If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the
location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with
the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P).  This
would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release
cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2.


Do we have locations for the summit announced? It's hard to name
anything without these..


Yes, was announced at the keynotes in Austin. May 2017 OpenStack Summit
will be held in Boston and the November 2017 OpenStack Summit will be
held in Sydney.

Source: https://twitter.com/OpenStack/status/724628774961074176



Thanks! Would be good to duplicate it to openstack-announce (or was it
done already?) for folks who were not on keynotes and don't follow twitter.


++

It should be continually noted that a non-zero number of our 
contributors do not use Twitter and are unlikely to start. So while 
tweets are great for the people who do use it, it should never be 
considered to have been communicated to our community if it was only 
tweeted.



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

2016-05-04 Thread Dmitry Tantsur 

On 05/04/2016 02:44 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:

Dmitry Tantsur wrote:

On 05/02/2016 08:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote:

When will we name the P release of OpenStack?  We named two releases
simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle.  This
gave us the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata)
releases.

If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the
location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with
the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P).  This
would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release
cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2.


Do we have locations for the summit announced? It's hard to name
anything without these..


Yes, was announced at the keynotes in Austin. May 2017 OpenStack Summit
will be held in Boston and the November 2017 OpenStack Summit will be
held in Sydney.

Source: https://twitter.com/OpenStack/status/724628774961074176



Thanks! Would be good to duplicate it to openstack-announce (or was it 
done already?) for folks who were not on keynotes and don't follow twitter.


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

2016-05-04 Thread Thierry Carrez 

Dmitry Tantsur wrote:

On 05/02/2016 08:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote:

When will we name the P release of OpenStack?  We named two releases
simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle.  This
gave us the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata)
releases.

If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the
location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with
the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P).  This
would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release
cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2.


Do we have locations for the summit announced? It's hard to name
anything without these..


Yes, was announced at the keynotes in Austin. May 2017 OpenStack Summit 
will be held in Boston and the November 2017 OpenStack Summit will be 
held in Sydney.


Source: https://twitter.com/OpenStack/status/724628774961074176

--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

2016-05-04 Thread Dmitry Tantsur 

On 05/02/2016 08:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote:

Hi everyone,

When will we name the P release of OpenStack?  We named two releases
simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle.  This
gave us the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata)
releases.

If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the
location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with
the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P).  This
would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release
cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2.


Do we have locations for the summit announced? It's hard to name 
anything without these..


Also do we base names on the main summit or the design summit locations?



--
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

2016-05-03 Thread Carol Bouchard (caboucha) 
Here are other ideas?  

Paul-Revere   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Revere
Peabody A town north east of Boston.  No special reason except 
saying the name personally makes me chuckle  
Patriots  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_England_Patriots


-Original Message-
From: Jonathan D. Proulx [mailto:j...@csail.mit.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 10:29 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:09:40AM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
:On 05/02/2016 08:07 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
:>But, the original spelling of the landing site is Plimoth Rock.  There were 
still highway signs up in the 70's directing folks to "Plimoth Rock"

There are trill signs with both spellings. Presumably for sligtly different 
contexts. Even having lived here basically my whole life I'm not sure if 
there's a consistent distinction except the legal entity that is the town is 
always with a y

:>
:>--Rocky
:>Who should know about rocks ;-)



:And Providnece is, I think close enough for inclusion as well.  And :that is 
just the towns.

:
:
:Plymouth is the only County in Mass with a P name, but Penobscott ME :used to 
be part of MA, and should probably be in the running as well.


I'd second Providnece and Penobscott as 'close enough'.  I'm actually partial 
to Providence...

-Jon

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

2016-05-03 Thread David_Paterson 
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
Providence

-Original Message-
From: Monty Taylor [mailto:mord...@inaugust.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 9:38 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

On 05/03/2016 09:29 AM, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:09:40AM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
> :On 05/02/2016 08:07 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
> :>But, the original spelling of the landing site is Plimoth Rock. There were 
> still highway signs up in the 70's directing folks to "Plimoth Rock"
>
> There are trill signs with both spellings. Presumably for sligtly
> different contexts. Even having lived here basically my whole life I'm
> not sure if there's a consistent distinction except the legal entity
> that is the town is always with a y
>
> :>
> :>--Rocky
> :>Who should know about rocks ;-)
>
>
>
> :And Providnece is, I think close enough for inclusion as well. And
> :that is just the towns.

If you think the geographic region should be "New England" instead of 
"Massachusetts", please leave a review comment on the review. I thought about 
suggesting New England since we already had one summit in Boston anyway. Input 
highly welcome.

> :
> :
> :Plymouth is the only County in Mass with a P name, but Penobscott ME
> :used to be part of MA, and should probably be in the running as well.
>
>
> I'd second Providnece and Penobscott as 'close enough'. I'm actually
> partial to Providence...


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

2016-05-03 Thread Monty Taylor 

On 05/03/2016 09:29 AM, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:09:40AM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
:On 05/02/2016 08:07 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
:>But, the original spelling of the landing site is Plimoth Rock.  There were still 
highway signs up in the 70's directing folks to "Plimoth Rock"

There are trill signs with both spellings. Presumably for sligtly
different contexts. Even having lived here basically my whole life I'm
not sure if there's a consistent distinction except the legal entity
that is the town is always with a y

:>
:>--Rocky
:>Who should know about rocks ;-)



:And Providnece is, I think close enough for inclusion as well.  And
:that is just the towns.


If you think the geographic region should be "New England" instead of 
"Massachusetts", please leave a review comment on the review. I thought 
about suggesting New England since we already had one summit in Boston 
anyway. Input highly welcome.



:
:
:Plymouth is the only County in Mass with a P name, but Penobscott ME
:used to be part of MA, and should probably be in the running as well.


I'd second Providnece and Penobscott as 'close enough'.  I'm actually
partial to Providence...



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

2016-05-03 Thread Jonathan D. Proulx 
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:09:40AM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
:On 05/02/2016 08:07 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
:>But, the original spelling of the landing site is Plimoth Rock.  There were 
still highway signs up in the 70's directing folks to "Plimoth Rock"

There are trill signs with both spellings. Presumably for sligtly
different contexts. Even having lived here basically my whole life I'm
not sure if there's a consistent distinction except the legal entity
that is the town is always with a y

:>
:>--Rocky
:>Who should know about rocks ;-)



:And Providnece is, I think close enough for inclusion as well.  And
:that is just the towns.

:
:
:Plymouth is the only County in Mass with a P name, but Penobscott ME
:used to be part of MA, and should probably be in the running as well.


I'd second Providnece and Penobscott as 'close enough'.  I'm actually
partial to Providence...

-Jon

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

2016-05-02 Thread Adam Young 

On 05/02/2016 08:07 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:

But, the original spelling of the landing site is Plimoth Rock.  There were still highway 
signs up in the 70's directing folks to "Plimoth Rock"

--Rocky
Who should know about rocks ;-)

-Original Message-
From: Brian Haley [mailto:brian.ha...@hpe.com]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 3:12 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
There seems to be some vaugaries about which aligns with which.  If the 
Q naming alignes with Boston, I think it could be fun.  The obvious one 
is Quincy, but Quabbin (Reservoir) and lots of other Algonquin names are 
in the running, too.


If it is P, there are many other options:

 * Palmer <http://www.townofpalmer.com/> <http://www.palmerschools.org/>
 * Paxton <http://townofpaxton.net/> <http://www.rmlpaxton.org/>
 * Peabody <http://www.peabody-ma.gov/> <http://www.peabody.k12.ma.us/>
 * Pembroke <http://www.townofpembrokemass.org>
   <http://www.pembrokepolice.org/>
 * Pepperell <http://www.town.pepperell.ma.us/>
   <http://www.lawrencelibrary.org/>
 * Peru <http://www.mass.gov/cc/peru.html> <http://perulibrary.selfip.com/>
 * Phillipston <http://www.northquabbinchamber.com/>
 * Pittsfield <http://www.pittsfield-ma.org/>
   <http://www.berkshire.net/PittsfieldLibrary/>
 * Plainville <http://www.plainville.ma.us> Schools
   <http://www.plainville.mec.edu/>
 * Plymouth <http://www.townofplymouth.org/>
   <http://www.plymouthschools.com/>
 * Plympton <http://town.plympton.ma.us/>
 * Princeton <http://town.princeton.ma.us/>
   <http://library.town.princeton.ma.us/>
 * Provincetown <http://www.provincetown-ma.gov/>

And Providnece is, I think cliose enough for inclusion as well.  And 
that is just the towns.



Plymouth is the only County in Mass with a P name, but Penobscott ME 
used to be part of MA, and should probably be in the running as well.








On 05/02/2016 02:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote:

Hi everyone,

When will we name the P release of OpenStack?  We named two releases
simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle.  This gave us
the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata) releases.

If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the location is now
known) we would be able to have names associated with the current release cycle
(Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P).  This would also allow us to get back to
only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently have names for N,
N+1, and N+2.

Is there really going to be an option besides Plymouth?  I remember something
important happened there in 1620 ;-)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth,_Massachusetts

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

2016-05-02 Thread Rochelle Grober 
But, the original spelling of the landing site is Plimoth Rock.  There were 
still highway signs up in the 70's directing folks to "Plimoth Rock"

--Rocky
Who should know about rocks ;-)

-Original Message-
From: Brian Haley [mailto:brian.ha...@hpe.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 3:12 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

On 05/02/2016 02:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> When will we name the P release of OpenStack?  We named two releases
> simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle.  This gave 
> us
> the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata) releases.
>
> If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the location is 
> now
> known) we would be able to have names associated with the current release 
> cycle
> (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P).  This would also allow us to get back to
> only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently have names for N,
> N+1, and N+2.

Is there really going to be an option besides Plymouth?  I remember something 
important happened there in 1620 ;-)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth,_Massachusetts

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

2016-05-02 Thread Brian Haley 

On 05/02/2016 02:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote:

Hi everyone,

When will we name the P release of OpenStack?  We named two releases
simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle.  This gave us
the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata) releases.

If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the location is now
known) we would be able to have names associated with the current release cycle
(Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P).  This would also allow us to get back to
only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently have names for N,
N+1, and N+2.


Is there really going to be an option besides Plymouth?  I remember something 
important happened there in 1620 ;-)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth,_Massachusetts

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

2016-05-02 Thread Shamail Tahir 
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Monty Taylor  wrote:

> On 05/02/2016 01:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> When will we name the P release of OpenStack?  We named two releases
>> simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle.  This
>> gave us the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata)
>> releases.
>>
>> If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the
>> location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with
>> the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P).  This
>> would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release
>> cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2.
>>
>
> Patches already up ...
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/310425/
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/310426/


Thanks Monty.  Shouldn't we just starting naming one release again?  This
will give the community the names of the next three releases
consistently... If we would for two of them at a time then we will have
some periods where four names will be known and others where we might only
know three (i.e. during Ocata).


>
> Monty
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

2016-05-02 Thread Monty Taylor 

On 05/02/2016 01:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote:

Hi everyone,

When will we name the P release of OpenStack?  We named two releases
simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle.  This
gave us the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata)
releases.

If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the
location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with
the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P).  This
would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release
cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2.


Patches already up ...

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/310425/

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/310426/

Monty

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev