Re: [opensuse] 10.1 Multiple wireless routers 1 wireless card?

2007-09-15 Thread Adolph Sharon Weidanz
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
 On Sep 2 2007 17:37, Adolph Weidanz wrote:
 Now I found a couple of ideas on how to do it: I set the linksys to
 192.168.1.2, both the routers are on channel 1. One place I've run into
 problems is that the howtos I've found all say that the essid's have to
 be different. So say, the dlink's essid is route1, and linksys is
 route2. The problem with this is the network card setup requires an
 essid in order to use WEP. If I use route1 then it can't see route2.

 The easiest way to do it is to buy a second wireless card and set the
 linksys as 192.168.0.1, but I would rather get it to work without the
 this way.

 Any ideas be appreciated...
 
 
 I know of the rt2500 2.x driver which does provide a wmaster0 interface
 of which more interfaces can be cloned so as to log into multiple ESSIDs.
 Never tried it though.
 
 
   Jan
Well... I gave it up and just rearranged things so the printer hooked to
the main router...

-- 
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes

“To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that
we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only
unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American
public.” [Theodore Roosevelt] 1918

Adolph  Sharon Weidanz SuSE 10.1
'78 43' Endeavour Ketch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Team 45
S/V Time To Paws
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 10.1 Multiple wireless routers 1 wireless card?

2007-09-06 Thread Jan Engelhardt

On Sep 2 2007 17:37, Adolph Weidanz wrote:
Now I found a couple of ideas on how to do it: I set the linksys to
192.168.1.2, both the routers are on channel 1. One place I've run into
problems is that the howtos I've found all say that the essid's have to
be different. So say, the dlink's essid is route1, and linksys is
route2. The problem with this is the network card setup requires an
essid in order to use WEP. If I use route1 then it can't see route2.

The easiest way to do it is to buy a second wireless card and set the
linksys as 192.168.0.1, but I would rather get it to work without the
this way.

Any ideas be appreciated...


I know of the rt2500 2.x driver which does provide a wmaster0 interface
of which more interfaces can be cloned so as to log into multiple ESSIDs.
Never tried it though.


Jan
-- 
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 10.1 Multiple wireless routers 1 wireless card?

2007-09-03 Thread G T Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Adolph Weidanz wrote:
 Hey all...
 
 This might be one of those that just can't be done...
 
 Ok... I have a DLink 451 (HSDPA hotspot wireless router) that I have
 setup as 192.168.1.1 w/ DHCP off (all the computers have set IPs). I
 also have a ancient linksys befw11s4 wireless. In a perfect world I want
 to have the linksys act as an AP for the printer (yes it is networkable)
 and the dlink connect to the world. All of the computers would connect
 via the dlink, but be able to print by sending via cups to 192.168.1.1/2
 
 Now I found a couple of ideas on how to do it: I set the linksys to
 192.168.1.2, both the routers are on channel 1. One place I've run into
 problems is that the howtos I've found all say that the essid's have to
 be different. So say, the dlink's essid is route1, and linksys is
 route2. The problem with this is the network card setup requires an
 essid in order to use WEP. If I use route1 then it can't see route2.
 
 The easiest way to do it is to buy a second wireless card and set the
 linksys as 192.168.0.1, but I would rather get it to work without the
 this way.
 
 Any ideas be appreciated...
 

What I am not clear about is whether the other machines have wi-fi or
cable networking ...

Unfortunately AP are low level connection points and normal IP based
routing techniques cannot be used with the APs themselves.

If you choose to run two distinct wireless networks and you need one
machine to connect to both you will need two wi-fi cards on that
machine. To avoid the two interfering with each other you need them to
be on two channels at least 2 apart (i.e. 5 7 , 6 8) but preferably
further, it is definitely not a good idea to have them on the same
channel. BTW Check your countries wireless regulation a couple of EU
states have some restrictions on what channels can be used.

You do not state the make of printer or the distance between printer and
the box you wish to connect to. Some printer have Bluetooth support or
can be upgraded with a WiFi card this may provide an alternative option.

It is possibled to setup a wireless bridge but this is usually only
possible with two devices from the same manufacturer which have support
for that manufacturers bridging technology (I am running a netgear wifi
bridge based setup myself). You will probably be able to do this if one
or other of the manufacturers of your current APs supplies an AP with
bridge support that can be connected to by cable to the other
manufacturers router.

Finally, there are wireless print servers available.

- --
==
I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to use as my
telephone.
My wish has come true. I no longer know how to use my telephone.

Bjarne Stroustrup
==
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG28yvasN0sSnLmgIRArwlAKDfRidkHYyyiqUuJRuixNKnwn/rXgCgnrt/
HY4wWtRWX8cr28n+VC/OQqw=
=uN8U
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 10.1 Multiple wireless routers 1 wireless card?

2007-09-03 Thread G T Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Adolph  Sharon Weidanz wrote:
 G T Smith wrote:
 Adolph Weidanz wrote:
 Hey all...
 
 Any ideas be appreciated...

 What I am not clear about is whether the other machines have wi-fi or
 cable networking ...
 
 The other machines are all wi-fi, the only cable I wanted to use was the
 one between the linksys and the printer.
 
 Unfortunately AP are low level connection points and normal IP based
 routing techniques cannot be used with the APs themselves.
 
 Since the printer has it's own IP (192.168.1.15) then would the AP be
 transparent and the packet just hunt down where .15 is?
 

No.. been there, got the teeshirt.

What you will have is two separate networks that will not pass info
between each other and random connectivity to the APs that link to those
networks.. not only will you not get the result you desire you are
likely to prang the whole network (as routing will become chaotic). To
integrate the APs you need to bridge between them somehow so everything
is always connectable to everything else. APs do not function like
network cards they provide the equivalent of the wire to connect between
locations.

A possible alternative is a power cable network connection (via your
power cables, not a lot of bandwidth but do you really need it for a
printer?). I have never investigated using this technology with Linux
but it might worth considering in your situation.  .

 If you choose to run two distinct wireless networks and you need one
 machine to connect to both you will need two wi-fi cards on that
 machine. To avoid the two interfering with each other you need them to
 This is what I was hoping to avoid. I guess this is the way to go, the
 cards are fairly cheap...

With this you will have two approaches available (bridging or routing),
with the linux bridge support I have had problems with WiFi cards so
routing is probably the soundest option. BTW you may have further
problems if you use a laptop for routing, a desktop class machine is
probably preferable.

 
 You do not state the make of printer or the distance between printer and
 the box you wish to connect to. Some printer have Bluetooth support or
 can be upgraded with a WiFi card this may provide an alternative option.
 The printer is a Dell 1600N and the linksys router sits next to it. The
 dlink sits about 30ft away, but because of the location a wire can't be
 run from the printer to the dlink.
 
 Finally, there are wireless print servers available.

 But they are more then the wireless cards, and the goal of the setup was
 to make it work with existing equipment.

Actually if you have old knackered PC available you can put in a a WiFi
card in it and connect to the printer directly. (You only would only
need a monitor for the initial setup).
 


- --
==
I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to use as my
telephone.
My wish has come true. I no longer know how to use my telephone.

Bjarne Stroustrup
==
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG3BrFasN0sSnLmgIRAhu9AKDQsOAnjHEVeDZoGtRR9ocXl4DHmACgiZay
aksSbuX/7bdBIUuhjpCpJDs=
=leV3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] 10.1 Multiple wireless routers 1 wireless card?

2007-09-03 Thread ka1ifq
On Monday 03 September 2007 10:31, G T Smith wrote:
 Adolph  Sharon Weidanz wrote:
  G T Smith wrote:
  Adolph Weidanz wrote:
  Hey all...
 
  Any ideas be appreciated...
 
  What I am not clear about is whether the other machines have wi-fi or
  cable networking ...
 
  The other machines are all wi-fi, the only cable I wanted to use was the
  one between the linksys and the printer.
 
  Unfortunately AP are low level connection points and normal IP based
  routing techniques cannot be used with the APs themselves.
 
  Since the printer has it's own IP (192.168.1.15) then would the AP be
  transparent and the packet just hunt down where .15 is?

 No.. been there, got the teeshirt.

 What you will have is two separate networks that will not pass info
 between each other and random connectivity to the APs that link to those
 networks.. not only will you not get the result you desire you are
 likely to prang the whole network (as routing will become chaotic). To
 integrate the APs you need to bridge between them somehow so everything
 is always connectable to everything else. APs do not function like
 network cards they provide the equivalent of the wire to connect between
 locations.

 A possible alternative is a power cable network connection (via your
 power cables, not a lot of bandwidth but do you really need it for a
 printer?). I have never investigated using this technology with Linux
 but it might worth considering in your situation.  .

  If you choose to run two distinct wireless networks and you need one
  machine to connect to both you will need two wi-fi cards on that
  machine. To avoid the two interfering with each other you need them to
 
  This is what I was hoping to avoid. I guess this is the way to go, the
  cards are fairly cheap...

 With this you will have two approaches available (bridging or routing),
 with the linux bridge support I have had problems with WiFi cards so
 routing is probably the soundest option. BTW you may have further
 problems if you use a laptop for routing, a desktop class machine is
 probably preferable.

  You do not state the make of printer or the distance between printer and
  the box you wish to connect to. Some printer have Bluetooth support or
  can be upgraded with a WiFi card this may provide an alternative option.
 
  The printer is a Dell 1600N and the linksys router sits next to it. The
  dlink sits about 30ft away, but because of the location a wire can't be
  run from the printer to the dlink.
 
  Finally, there are wireless print servers available.
 
  But they are more then the wireless cards, and the goal of the setup was
  to make it work with existing equipment.

 Actually if you have old knackered PC available you can put in a a WiFi
 card in it and connect to the printer directly. (You only would only
 need a monitor for the initial setup).

 I musta missed the original post. It sounds like you want to connect a 
printer to a router / wap and use it on an existing wireless network.

 I have my computer connected that way right now!

 I had a Linksys WAP11 originally, there is a setting in one of the menu's 
that allows it to operate basiclly in reverse, after you set it up you can 
unplug a wired system and plug in the AP and the system knows no difference.

 I just upgraded to a Buffalo WHR-G54S and did the same thing, so it can be 
done, it's all in the setup! I bought the Buffalo because it was $50 with $25 
in rebates.

HTH, Good Luck.
Mike
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]