Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Vahis
houghi wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>   
>>> It should be a nice way to test online updates. Just to test the update
>>> process. Edit the Release Notes to include: Update worked or just change
>>> an icon. Just something to test the process.
>>>   
>> I have been planning this for regular online updates, but we did not (and
>> likely still don't) have resources to do so.
>> 
>
> I am not talking about doing actual online updates. I am talking about a
> directory to *test* online updates in Factory, Alpha, Beta and RC.
>
> e.g. just one file that will be updated and that is the "Release notes" or
> somthing else competely irrelevant to the working of the system itself.
> Perhaps just a test added to the realease notes that states that no real
> security updates are done.
>
> That way we have a directory to point to for our online updates during the
> pre-release period and see what goes right or wrong. So no real (security)
> updates, but a rocess to *test* the process.
>
> At this moment, I think there is no way we can test YOU or similar
> processes with zen. Such a directory would make it possible to test these
> processes.
>   
I have tried to test the following:

I have an install repo on a server. I put a newer package there and see
if it works.

I'll have some results soon. Like tomorrow, maybe.

Createrepo and stuff, you know...

Vahis

-- 
http://waxborg.servepics.com
http://waxborg.servepics.com/mobile/articles/vmware.html
http://waxborg.servepics.com/English/Linux/susemultimedia.en.html
http://waxborg.servepics.com/English/Bikes/Trackdays/index.html


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread houghi
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > It should be a nice way to test online updates. Just to test the update
> > process. Edit the Release Notes to include: Update worked or just change
> > an icon. Just something to test the process.
> 
> I have been planning this for regular online updates, but we did not (and
> likely still don't) have resources to do so.

I am not talking about doing actual online updates. I am talking about a
directory to *test* online updates in Factory, Alpha, Beta and RC.

e.g. just one file that will be updated and that is the "Release notes" or
somthing else competely irrelevant to the working of the system itself.
Perhaps just a test added to the realease notes that states that no real
security updates are done.

That way we have a directory to point to for our online updates during the
pre-release period and see what goes right or wrong. So no real (security)
updates, but a rocess to *test* the process.

At this moment, I think there is no way we can test YOU or similar
processes with zen. Such a directory would make it possible to test these
processes.
-- 
houghi  http://houghi.org   http://www.plainfaqs.org/linux/
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
>
>   Today I went outside. My pupils have never been tinier...

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 09:14:06PM +0200, houghi wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 08:11:58PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > Of course we can now do more such one-offs ;)
> 
> I believe that such a directory should be part of the Factory process all
> the time. If not for actual updates, then at least for testing purposes.
> 
> It should be a nice way to test online updates. Just to test the update
> process. Edit the Release Notes to include: Update worked or just change
> an icon. Just something to test the process.

I have been planning this for regular online updates, but we did not (and
likely still don't) have resources to do so.

Ciao, Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread houghi
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 08:11:58PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Of course we can now do more such one-offs ;)

I believe that such a directory should be part of the Factory process all
the time. If not for actual updates, then at least for testing purposes.

It should be a nice way to test online updates. Just to test the update
process. Edit the Release Notes to include: Update worked or just change
an icon. Just something to test the process.
-- 
houghi  http://houghi.org   http://www.plainfaqs.org/linux/
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
>
>   Today I went outside. My pupils have never been tinier...

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread jdd

Marcus Meissner wrote:


Of course we can now do more such one-offs ;)


I think this is very good; May be the kde discussion could 
be solved in a similar way.


Some things must be fixed even in stable version. sometime :-)

jdd


--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Vahis
Marcus Meissner wrote:
>> That page is cool!
>>
>> My understanding improved significantly. It's not hard to improve from
>> zero :)
>>
>> Is this update-test going to stay there for testing or is it a one-off?
>> Should it be kept?
>> 
>
> We will reissue this set of packages in there as regular online update
> once testing has finished.
>
> Of course we can now do more such one-offs ;)
>
> Ciao, marcus
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>   
OK. I'll keep it on my "factory machine"

I ran the stuff seemingly successfully and removed it from my desktop
machine.

Testing now with adding and removing sources and software with rug and
Updater/Installer.

Looking good so far...

Vahis

-- 
http://waxborg.servepics.com
http://waxborg.servepics.com/mobile/articles/vmware.html
http://waxborg.servepics.com/English/Linux/susemultimedia.en.html
http://waxborg.servepics.com/English/Bikes/Trackdays/index.html


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] updating yum repodata

2006-05-24 Thread Greg Edwards
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:07:20PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
| On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:03:33PM -0500, Greg Edwards wrote:
| > Is there a reason why the yum repodata (inst-source/suse/repodata) in
| > factory only updates every few days to a week?  It seems like this should
| > be getting updated at least nightly as new packages are added and updated.
| 
| It is only updated when new updates are released.

Ok, but it appears sometimes rpms are updated without a version/release
number bump?  I periodically see drpmsync pull over deltas with no
change to the repodata.  This can sometimes happen a couple days in a
row, then finally a big push comes and the repodata is updated.

A case in point, on my ia64 factory box, openssh-4.2p1-18 is installed.
It requires libopensc.so.1, but the openssh rpm in factory with the same
version/release number now requires libopensc.so.2.

# rpm -q openssh
openssh-4.2p1-18

# rpm -q --requires openssh | grep opensc
libopensc.so.1()(64bit)

# rpm -qp --requires openssh-4.2p1-18.ia64.rpm | grep opensc
libopensc.so.2()(64bit)

Why no version/release number change to the rpm, though the requirements
and what it was built against changed?  I would expect at least the
release number to get bumped if the contents of the build root changed.

Greg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Marcus Meissner
> That page is cool!
> 
> My understanding improved significantly. It's not hard to improve from
> zero :)
> 
> Is this update-test going to stay there for testing or is it a one-off?
> Should it be kept?

We will reissue this set of packages in there as regular online update
once testing has finished.

Of course we can now do more such one-offs ;)

Ciao, marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Vahis
Martin Schlander wrote:
> onsdag 24 maj 2006 17:22 skrev Marcus Meissner:
>   
>> Use
>>
>> rug sa --type=zypp
>> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/ 
>> update-test
>> 
>
> I've replaced Yum with Zypp in the examples on this page.
> http://en.opensuse.org/Examples_using_rug
>
> It seems that using zypp is generally the best approach.
>
> Martin / cb400f
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>   
That page is cool!

My understanding improved significantly. It's not hard to improve from
zero :)

Is this update-test going to stay there for testing or is it a one-off?
Should it be kept?

Vahis

-- 
http://waxborg.servepics.com
http://waxborg.servepics.com/mobile/articles/vmware.html
http://waxborg.servepics.com/English/Linux/susemultimedia.en.html
http://waxborg.servepics.com/English/Bikes/Trackdays/index.html


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Martin Schlander
onsdag 24 maj 2006 17:22 skrev Marcus Meissner:
> Use
>
> rug sa --type=zypp
> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/ 
> update-test

I've replaced Yum with Zypp in the examples on this page.
http://en.opensuse.org/Examples_using_rug

It seems that using zypp is generally the best approach.

Martin / cb400f

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Vahis
Vahis wrote:
> I wonder if I should now run them, this is my attempted-to-keep
> installation.
> I ran those already on my factory one but I don't know yet what they did.
>   

I ran them. After that the globe went orange again with:

Update Version: 1424-0
Installed Version:
Category: Recommended

Status: Applied

bugfix for dhcp (DHCLIENT_HOSTNAME_OPTION)

It saya Applied but because of the orange I attempted to run it with result:

21|/content (ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/suser-guru/rpm/10.1/)
23|389A563CC272A126|Andreas Jaeger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>|93A3365ECE47B889DF7FFED1389A563CC272A126
23|A84EDAE89C800ACA|SuSE Package Signing Key
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>|79C179B2E1C820C1890F9994A84EDAE89C800ACA
21|/repodata/repomd.xml (http://packman.iu-bremen.de/suse/10.1)

And the globe stays orange

Vahis

-- 
http://waxborg.servepics.com
http://waxborg.servepics.com/mobile/articles/vmware.html
http://waxborg.servepics.com/English/Linux/susemultimedia.en.html
http://waxborg.servepics.com/English/Bikes/Trackdays/index.html


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Vahis
Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 06:21:29PM +0300, Vahis wrote:
>   
>> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> 
>>> Vahis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>>   
>>>   
  # rug sa
 
 
>>> Add: --type=yum
>>> or: --type=zypp
>>>
>>> both should work.
>>>
>>>   
>>>   
 ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/
 ERROR: Could not add
 'ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/':
 No suitable service types could be found

 I added that with YaST and it worked.

 The stuff appeared as updates (the Globe went orange) in updater.

 Updates were then installed.

 At this stage I'm so mixed up with all these adding and removin that I'm
 not sure what those updates did or didn't.
 
 
>>> ;-)
>>>
>>> Restart zmd and zen-updater and you're current again,
>>>
>>> Andreas
>>>   
>>>   
>> # rug sa --type=yum
>> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/
>> ERROR: Please provide a name for the service
>>
>> # rug sa --type=zypp
>> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/
>> ERROR: Please provide a name for the service
>>
>> man rug is unclear to me here. Is written for people who can read or
>> what? :)
>>
>> What shoul I name it and how? Don't they have names, everybody naming
>> them themselves as they like might cause problems in remembering what
>> they are later?
>> 
>
> Use
>
> rug sa --type=zypp 
> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/  
> update-test
>
> You missed the actual name at the end of the commandline.
>
> Then:
>   rug sub update-test
>
> Ciao, Marcus
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>   

This worked, thank you. The globe went Orange, 17 updates.

Didn't last long either.

I wonder if I should now run them, this is my attempted-to-keep
installation.
I ran those already on my factory one but I don't know yet what they did.

Vahis

-- 
http://waxborg.servepics.com
http://waxborg.servepics.com/mobile/articles/vmware.html
http://waxborg.servepics.com/English/Linux/susemultimedia.en.html
http://waxborg.servepics.com/English/Bikes/Trackdays/index.html


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 06:21:29PM +0300, Vahis wrote:
> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > Vahis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >   
> >>  # rug sa
> >> 
> >
> > Add: --type=yum
> > or: --type=zypp
> >
> > both should work.
> >
> >   
> >> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/
> >> ERROR: Could not add
> >> 'ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/':
> >> No suitable service types could be found
> >>
> >> I added that with YaST and it worked.
> >>
> >> The stuff appeared as updates (the Globe went orange) in updater.
> >>
> >> Updates were then installed.
> >>
> >> At this stage I'm so mixed up with all these adding and removin that I'm
> >> not sure what those updates did or didn't.
> >> 
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> > Restart zmd and zen-updater and you're current again,
> >
> > Andreas
> >   
> # rug sa --type=yum
> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/
> ERROR: Please provide a name for the service
> 
> # rug sa --type=zypp
> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/
> ERROR: Please provide a name for the service
> 
> man rug is unclear to me here. Is written for people who can read or
> what? :)
> 
> What shoul I name it and how? Don't they have names, everybody naming
> them themselves as they like might cause problems in remembering what
> they are later?

Use

rug sa --type=zypp 
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/  
update-test

You missed the actual name at the end of the commandline.

Then:
rug sub update-test

Ciao, Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Vahis
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Vahis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>   
>>  # rug sa
>> 
>
> Add: --type=yum
> or: --type=zypp
>
> both should work.
>
>   
>> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/
>> ERROR: Could not add
>> 'ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/':
>> No suitable service types could be found
>>
>> I added that with YaST and it worked.
>>
>> The stuff appeared as updates (the Globe went orange) in updater.
>>
>> Updates were then installed.
>>
>> At this stage I'm so mixed up with all these adding and removin that I'm
>> not sure what those updates did or didn't.
>> 
>
> ;-)
>
> Restart zmd and zen-updater and you're current again,
>
> Andreas
>   
# rug sa --type=yum
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/
ERROR: Please provide a name for the service

# rug sa --type=zypp
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/
ERROR: Please provide a name for the service

man rug is unclear to me here. Is written for people who can read or
what? :)

What shoul I name it and how? Don't they have names, everybody naming
them themselves as they like might cause problems in remembering what
they are later?

Vahis

-- 
http://waxborg.servepics.com
http://waxborg.servepics.com/mobile/articles/vmware.html
http://waxborg.servepics.com/English/Linux/susemultimedia.en.html
http://waxborg.servepics.com/English/Bikes/Trackdays/index.html


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Andras Mantia
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 16:32, Andras Mantia wrote:
> How can I do it? I see no dups in GUI so if you suggest that I should
> use a command line tool, there is a problem for the regular end
> user...

After removing the duplicates, upgrading the rpm, restarting zmd and 
waiting a little:
time rug sl
Waking up ZMD...Done

# | Status | Type | Name  
| URI
--++--+---+
1 | Active | ZYPP | 20060516-193554   
| ftp://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/mirrors/ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/update/10.1
2 | Active | ZYPP | 
SUSE-Linux-10.1-CD-download-x86_64-10.1-0-20060517-172513 | 
dvd:///?alias=SUSE-Linux-10.1-CD-download-x86_64-10.1-0-20060517-172513
3 | Active | ZYPP | 20060517-180334   
| dir:///media/extra/data/data/opensuse/packman/10.1/


real3m13.341s
user0m0.484s
sys 0m0.008s


This is better, but I'm not sure if not the removal of duplicates 
helped. The new one seems to be slow as the old one.

Andras


Andras
-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org


pgp015vH3wYsg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Andreas Jaeger
Vahis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>  # rug sa

Add: --type=yum
or: --type=zypp

both should work.

> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/
> ERROR: Could not add
> 'ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/':
> No suitable service types could be found
>
> I added that with YaST and it worked.
>
> The stuff appeared as updates (the Globe went orange) in updater.
>
> Updates were then installed.
>
> At this stage I'm so mixed up with all these adding and removin that I'm
> not sure what those updates did or didn't.

;-)

Restart zmd and zen-updater and you're current again,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126


pgpaTbWGT7ope.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse-factory] Update stack test build

2006-05-24 Thread Ulrich Windl
On 24 May 2006 at 14:10, houghi wrote:

> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:12:38PM +0200, houghi wrote:
> > `rug sl` gave me a time of 1.086 seconds (previously 12 minutes)
> > Just to be sure that there was nothing left in a cache, I rebooted. Then 
> > it took about 2.4 seconds. I will leave the machine on for a few hours and
> > see if there is any change
> 
> Waited more then one hour. and ran rug sl again. parse-metadata took
> 85-95% of the CPU. zmd the rest till 99%. The time it took i just saw
> 'Waking up ZMD' and no real indication something was going on. The time it
> took now was 7.21 minutescrontab

Try this next time: Get the process id of the "hanging" process (using "ps"). 
Then 
try a "strace -p " and see what's going on. Maybe you should use "ltrace" 
instead if nothing shows up.

> 
> I will see what putting it in crontab every 20 minutes does.

Regards,
Ulrich


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Andras Mantia
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 17:04, Vahis wrote:
> # rug sa
> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/
> ERROR: Could not add
> 'ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/
>': No suitable service types could be found
>
> I added that with YaST and it worked.

I did with yast. It never finished, but rug sl showed the source as 
added.

> The stuff appeared as updates (the Globe went orange) in updater.

I don't have the update app running, so I tried the usual way: 
Yast->Software Manager-> show all packages->install new versions if 
available (non was available). 

Whatever, I downloaded the RPMs now. ;-)

Andras
-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org


pgpLqk14aSGtW.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse-factory] Problem with Sound and Suspend

2006-05-24 Thread Marcel Hilzinger
Am Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2006 16:21 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:19:16PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2006 16:17 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> > > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:15:57PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> > > > Am Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2006 16:13 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:12:42PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> > > > > > Shuttle XPC, SB Audigy LS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I make a Suspend-to-* and Resume, I have no sound as user,
> > > > > > only as root. After little work, I found out, that before Suspend
> > > > > > permissions under /dev/snd are set to
> > > > > >
> > > > > > crw-- 1 marcel audio 116
> > > > > >
> > > > > > After resume they are set to
> > > > > >
> > > > > > crw-rw--- 1 root audio 116
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Driver issue? Powersave problem?
> > > > > > Another problem is, that the output is alwasy set to the digital
> > > > > > out. How to tell the system, to use the analog output per
> > > > > > default?
> > > > >
> > > > > Aren't you using resmgr?
> > > > >
> > > > > resmgr should hand out ACLs accordingly.
> > > >
> > > > 10.1 default install
> > >
> > > Logged inv via either kdm or gdm?
> >
> > kdm
> >
> > > please run:
> > >   /sbin/resmgr list
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> /sbin/resmgr list
> > r--- /dev/console
> > rw-- /dev/snd/timer
> > rw-- /dev/snd/seq
> > rw-- /dev/input/event0
> > rw-- /dev/sg1
> > rw-- /dev/sr0
>
> Please open a bugreport :/ . Also ls -l /dev/snd ... are there
> more than timer and seq?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls -l /dev/snd/
insgesamt 0
crw-rw  1 root audio 116, 12 2006-05-24 16:14 controlC0
crw-rw  1 root audio 116,  3 2006-05-24 16:14 midiC0D0
crw-rw  1 root audio 116, 11 2006-05-24 16:14 pcmC0D0c
crw-rw  1 root audio 116, 10 2006-05-24 16:14 pcmC0D0p
crw-rw  1 root audio 116,  9 2006-05-24 16:14 pcmC0D1c
crw-rw  1 root audio 116,  8 2006-05-24 16:14 pcmC0D1p
crw-rw  1 root audio 116,  7 2006-05-24 16:14 pcmC0D2c
crw-rw  1 root audio 116,  6 2006-05-24 16:14 pcmC0D2p
crw-rw  1 root audio 116,  5 2006-05-24 16:14 pcmC0D3c
crw-rw  1 root audio 116,  4 2006-05-24 16:14 pcmC0D3p
crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116, 13 2006-05-24 16:14 seq
crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116,  2 2006-05-24 16:14 timer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> 

>
> That the permission changes is ok (udev magic), but it should still
> have ACLs.
Thanks for the explanations. I will open a bugreport then.

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Marcel Hilzinger

Linux New Media AG
Süskindstr. 4
D-81929 München
Tel: +49 (89) 99 34 11 0
Fax: +49 (89) 99 34 11 99

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Problem with Sound and Suspend

2006-05-24 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:19:16PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2006 16:17 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:15:57PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2006 16:13 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> > > > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:12:42PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> > > > > Shuttle XPC, SB Audigy LS
> > > > >
> > > > > If I make a Suspend-to-* and Resume, I have no sound as user, only as
> > > > > root. After little work, I found out, that before Suspend permissions
> > > > > under /dev/snd are set to
> > > > >
> > > > > crw-- 1 marcel audio 116
> > > > >
> > > > > After resume they are set to
> > > > >
> > > > > crw-rw--- 1 root audio 116
> > > > >
> > > > > Driver issue? Powersave problem?
> > > > > Another problem is, that the output is alwasy set to the digital out.
> > > > > How to tell the system, to use the analog output per default?
> > > >
> > > > Aren't you using resmgr?
> > > >
> > > > resmgr should hand out ACLs accordingly.
> > >
> > > 10.1 default install
> >
> > Logged inv via either kdm or gdm?
> kdm
> >
> > please run:
> > /sbin/resmgr list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> /sbin/resmgr list
> r--- /dev/console
> rw-- /dev/snd/timer
> rw-- /dev/snd/seq
> rw-- /dev/input/event0
> rw-- /dev/sg1
> rw-- /dev/sr0

Please open a bugreport :/ . Also ls -l /dev/snd ... are there
more than timer and seq?

That the permission changes is ok (udev magic), but it should still
have ACLs.

Ciao, Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Problem with Sound and Suspend

2006-05-24 Thread Marcel Hilzinger
Am Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2006 16:17 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:15:57PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2006 16:13 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> > > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:12:42PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> > > > Shuttle XPC, SB Audigy LS
> > > >
> > > > If I make a Suspend-to-* and Resume, I have no sound as user, only as
> > > > root. After little work, I found out, that before Suspend permissions
> > > > under /dev/snd are set to
> > > >
> > > > crw-- 1 marcel audio 116
> > > >
> > > > After resume they are set to
> > > >
> > > > crw-rw--- 1 root audio 116
> > > >
> > > > Driver issue? Powersave problem?
> > > > Another problem is, that the output is alwasy set to the digital out.
> > > > How to tell the system, to use the analog output per default?
> > >
> > > Aren't you using resmgr?
> > >
> > > resmgr should hand out ACLs accordingly.
> >
> > 10.1 default install
>
> Logged inv via either kdm or gdm?
kdm
>
> please run:
>   /sbin/resmgr list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> /sbin/resmgr list
r--- /dev/console
rw-- /dev/snd/timer
rw-- /dev/snd/seq
rw-- /dev/input/event0
rw-- /dev/sg1
rw-- /dev/sr0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Marcel Hilzinger

Linux New Media AG
Süskindstr. 4
D-81929 München
Tel: +49 (89) 99 34 11 0
Fax: +49 (89) 99 34 11 99

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Problem with Sound and Suspend

2006-05-24 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:15:57PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2006 16:13 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:12:42PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> > > Shuttle XPC, SB Audigy LS
> > >
> > > If I make a Suspend-to-* and Resume, I have no sound as user, only as
> > > root. After little work, I found out, that before Suspend permissions
> > > under /dev/snd are set to
> > >
> > > crw-- 1 marcel audio 116
> > >
> > > After resume they are set to
> > >
> > > crw-rw--- 1 root audio 116
> > >
> > > Driver issue? Powersave problem?
> > > Another problem is, that the output is alwasy set to the digital out. How
> > > to tell the system, to use the analog output per default?
> >
> > Aren't you using resmgr?
> >
> > resmgr should hand out ACLs accordingly.
> 10.1 default install

Logged inv via either kdm or gdm?

please run:
/sbin/resmgr list

Ciao, Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Problem with Sound and Suspend

2006-05-24 Thread Marcel Hilzinger
Am Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2006 16:13 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:12:42PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> > Shuttle XPC, SB Audigy LS
> >
> > If I make a Suspend-to-* and Resume, I have no sound as user, only as
> > root. After little work, I found out, that before Suspend permissions
> > under /dev/snd are set to
> >
> > crw-- 1 marcel audio 116
> >
> > After resume they are set to
> >
> > crw-rw--- 1 root audio 116
> >
> > Driver issue? Powersave problem?
> > Another problem is, that the output is alwasy set to the digital out. How
> > to tell the system, to use the analog output per default?
>
> Aren't you using resmgr?
>
> resmgr should hand out ACLs accordingly.
10.1 default install
-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Marcel Hilzinger

Linux New Media AG
Süskindstr. 4
D-81929 München
Tel: +49 (89) 99 34 11 0
Fax: +49 (89) 99 34 11 99

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Problem with Sound and Suspend

2006-05-24 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:12:42PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> Shuttle XPC, SB Audigy LS
> 
> If I make a Suspend-to-* and Resume, I have no sound as user, only as root. 
> After little work, I found out, that before Suspend permissions 
> under /dev/snd are set to
> 
> crw-- 1 marcel audio 116 
> 
> After resume they are set to
> 
> crw-rw--- 1 root audio 116 
> 
> Driver issue? Powersave problem?
> Another problem is, that the output is alwasy set to the digital out. How to 
> tell the system, to use the analog output per default?

Aren't you using resmgr?

resmgr should hand out ACLs accordingly.

Ciao, Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse-factory] Problem with Sound and Suspend

2006-05-24 Thread Marcel Hilzinger
Shuttle XPC, SB Audigy LS

If I make a Suspend-to-* and Resume, I have no sound as user, only as root. 
After little work, I found out, that before Suspend permissions 
under /dev/snd are set to

crw-- 1 marcel audio 116 

After resume they are set to

crw-rw--- 1 root audio 116 

Driver issue? Powersave problem?
Another problem is, that the output is alwasy set to the digital out. How to 
tell the system, to use the analog output per default?
-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Marcel Hilzinger

Linux New Media AG
Süskindstr. 4
D-81929 München
Tel: +49 (89) 99 34 11 0
Fax: +49 (89) 99 34 11 99

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] regedit for linux?

2006-05-24 Thread jdd

Ulrich Windl wrote:


typical applications. An XML line with a length some 10kB isn't really "human-
readable".


XML is _not_ human readable :-) can't use DTD :-)

jdd



--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug handling

2006-05-24 Thread Andras Mantia
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 17:04, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:57:55PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >  Can someone from SUSE tell me how bug handling is done there? I
> > mean, if there is a bug reported for some version and is not fixed
> > in that version, is it taken in account for upcoming versions or it
> > is just forgotten? An example:
> > - a bug (like #176249 and previously #148638) is reported for 10.0
> > - it was closed with WONTFIX as the change cannot be made to a
> > released product
>
> Should not have happened. In this case the bug should be assigned
> to the next product.
>
> > - the bug is still present in 10.1 (somebody reports again)
> > - the bug is closed again as "it's too late and risky to do it"
>
> Same as above.

I reopened in both cases. ;-)

> You can reassign it to the next product, right now if possible.
>
> If it is still in the codebase, say so, reopen it, move it to the
> next product.

Well, I cannot test the upcoming 10.2, so I cannot just reassign. ;-) 
But I make sure at least to keep the bugs open as still as it is 
present in versions that I test. 

Andras
-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org


pgpguy6buf3CI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Vahis
Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 May 2006 18:30, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>   
>> I'm just putting our current packages to ftp.suse.com and mirrors for
>> testing:
>>
>> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/
>>
>> If the test is successfull, those packages will go out next week as
>> online update.  I'll write release notes later on what has changed,
>> 
>
> I wanted to try this, but the first try is not successfull. When I tried 
> to add the above as install-source, first I refused to import your key. 
> It failed to add. Next I choose import, now the dialog is there after 
> several tens of minutes (I had my lunch meantime). I guess I have to 
> update the rpms by hand.
>
> Andras
>
>   


 # rug sa
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/
ERROR: Could not add
'ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/':
No suitable service types could be found

I added that with YaST and it worked.

The stuff appeared as updates (the Globe went orange) in updater.

Updates were then installed.

At this stage I'm so mixed up with all these adding and removin that I'm
not sure what those updates did or didn't.

Vahis

-- 
http://waxborg.servepics.com
http://waxborg.servepics.com/mobile/articles/vmware.html
http://waxborg.servepics.com/English/Linux/susemultimedia.en.html
http://waxborg.servepics.com/English/Bikes/Trackdays/index.html


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug handling

2006-05-24 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:57:55PM +0300, Andras Mantia wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  Can someone from SUSE tell me how bug handling is done there? I mean, 
> if there is a bug reported for some version and is not fixed in that 
> version, is it taken in account for upcoming versions or it is just 
> forgotten? An example:
> - a bug (like #176249 and previously #148638) is reported for 10.0
> - it was closed with WONTFIX as the change cannot be made to a released 
> product

Should not have happened. In this case the bug should be assigned
to the next product.

> - the bug is still present in 10.1 (somebody reports again)
> - the bug is closed again as "it's too late and risky to do it"

Same as above.

> - the bug is still present and will be possibly present in 10.2 (unless 
> it's "fixed" upstream)
> 
> (The upcoming possible scenario is:
> - somebody reports "still present in 10.2" in a new bug
> - it get's closed as "too late now for 10.2, maybe 10.3)
> 
> The problem I have is not the fact that is not fixed, but the fact that 
> the bug report is closed even if it is present (and gets forgotten).
> 
> In KDE we do the following: if a bug is reported for version X it is 
> considered to be present in all versions > X unless somebody says 
> otherwise, but in case of SUSE this doesn't seem to be the case.
> 
> Please enlighten me. ;-)

You can reassign it to the next product, right now if possible.

If it is still in the codebase, say so, reopen it, move it to the next
product.

Ciao, Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse-factory] Bug handling

2006-05-24 Thread Andras Mantia
Hi,

 Can someone from SUSE tell me how bug handling is done there? I mean, 
if there is a bug reported for some version and is not fixed in that 
version, is it taken in account for upcoming versions or it is just 
forgotten? An example:
- a bug (like #176249 and previously #148638) is reported for 10.0
- it was closed with WONTFIX as the change cannot be made to a released 
product
- the bug is still present in 10.1 (somebody reports again)
- the bug is closed again as "it's too late and risky to do it"
- the bug is still present and will be possibly present in 10.2 (unless 
it's "fixed" upstream)

(The upcoming possible scenario is:
- somebody reports "still present in 10.2" in a new bug
- it get's closed as "too late now for 10.2, maybe 10.3)

The problem I have is not the fact that is not fixed, but the fact that 
the bug report is closed even if it is present (and gets forgotten).

In KDE we do the following: if a bug is reported for version X it is 
considered to be present in all versions > X unless somebody says 
otherwise, but in case of SUSE this doesn't seem to be the case.

Please enlighten me. ;-)

Andras


-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org


pgpLCEQfcMBrr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread andreas . hanke
Hi,

> SUSE uses lib64 for default 64bit libraries, so on AMD64 "everything" is 
> is /usr/lib64.

parse-metadata is not a library.

> > Sounds like another bug...
> 
> I don't think so.

But I do.

I just had a quick look and it looks like zmd.exe is really compiled 
differently on i586 and x86_64.

It shouldn't be, and the executables shouldn't be in the lib64 directory.

But it's probably not worth a bug report because the zmd package as a whole 
(not zmd.exe) needs to be architecture specific anyway for other, unrelated 
reasons.

Andreas Hanke
-- 


Bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten sparen: GMX SmartSurfer!
  Kostenlos downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread houghi
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 03:05:56PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> zmd does not store everything, so for every wakeup we have to parse
> the xml data.  This still takes a long time :-(

Having a crontab every 20 minutes seems to do the trick Just keep it
awake. I do not know what the concequences are and it seems to be an
extremely ugly trick, I think.
-- 
houghi  http://houghi.org   http://www.plainfaqs.org/linux/
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
>
>   Today I went outside. My pupils have never been tinier...

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Andras Mantia
On Tuesday 23 May 2006 18:30, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> I'm just putting our current packages to ftp.suse.com and mirrors for
> testing:
>
> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/10.1-packagemanagement-update-test/
>
> If the test is successfull, those packages will go out next week as
> online update.  I'll write release notes later on what has changed,

I wanted to try this, but the first try is not successfull. When I tried 
to add the above as install-source, first I refused to import your key. 
It failed to add. Next I choose import, now the dialog is there after 
several tens of minutes (I had my lunch meantime). I guess I have to 
update the rpms by hand.

Andras

-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org


pgpBTHhxHZ4Js.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Andras Mantia
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 16:05, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
[...]
> > Before you tell me about the dups, in Yast Installation Sources
> > (which again takes quite some time to show up completely) I have
> > the following:
> > On Off SUSE Linux 10.1 dvd:///
> > Off On YUM
> > ftp://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/mirrors/ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/update/10.1
> > On On YUM dir:///media/extra/data/data/opensuse/packman/10.1
> > On On YUM ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/update/10.1
[...]
> So, remove the dups to speed up...

How can I do it? I see no dups in GUI so if you suggest that I should 
use a command line tool, there is a problem for the regular end user... 


-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org


pgpubdNpTxvCX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Andras Mantia
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 16:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > /usr/lib64/zmd/parse-metadata /var/lib/zmd/zmd.db zypp
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > /usr/lib64/zmd/parse-metadata /var/lib/zmd/zmd.db zypp
>
> Why does this executable live in /usr/lib64? How can zmd.exe find it
> there? Is it compiled differently on lib64 systems? But wasn't it
> supposed to be architecture independent?

SUSE uses lib64 for default 64bit libraries, so on AMD64 "everything" is 
is /usr/lib64.

> Sounds like another bug...

I don't think so.

Andras

-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org


pgpzILkjBpTC4.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread andreas . hanke
Hi,

> /usr/lib64/zmd/parse-metadata /var/lib/zmd/zmd.db zypp
>
> [...]
>
> /usr/lib64/zmd/parse-metadata /var/lib/zmd/zmd.db zypp

Why does this executable live in /usr/lib64? How can zmd.exe find it there? Is 
it compiled differently on lib64 systems? But wasn't it supposed to be 
architecture independent?

Sounds like another bug...

Andreas Hanke
-- 


Bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten sparen: GMX SmartSurfer!
  Kostenlos downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Andreas Jaeger
Andras Mantia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Tuesday 23 May 2006 12:24, Anders Norrbring wrote:
>> Apparently it's the wake-up of Zen that takes forever..
> Yeah: AMD64 3200+, 1GB RAM: 
>
> Waking up ZMD takes minutes (4 minutes ) and the top processes are 
> parse-metadata and gpg:
>
> - gpg something like:
> gpg --no-default-keyring --quiet --no-tty --no-greeting 
> --no-permission-warning --status-fd 1 --homedir /var/tmp/TmpDir.9ivB2c 
> --import /var/lib/zypp/cache/Source.aDBK1K/DATA/content.key
>
> - parse-metadata is:
>
>
> I *did not* used an FTP source and when I started "rlug sl" my internet 
> connection was down (dial-up...):

zmd does not store everything, so for every wakeup we have to parse
the xml data.  This still takes a long time :-(

> rug sl
> Waking up ZMD...Done
>
> # | Status | Type | Name  
> | URI
> --++--+---+---
> 1 | Active | ZYPP | SUSE-Linux-CD-OSS-x86_64-10.1-0-20060414-082827   
> | 
> cd:///?devices=/dev/hdc,/dev/hdd;alias=SUSE-Linux-CD-OSS-x86_64-10.1-0-20060414-082827
> 2 | Active | ZYPP | SUSE-Linux-add-on-CD-10.1-0-20060423-180936   
> | 
> cd:///?devices=/dev/hdc,/dev/hdd;alias=SUSE-Linux-add-on-CD-10.1-0-20060423-180936
> 3 | Active | ZYPP | 20060516-193554   
> | ftp://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/mirrors/ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/update/10.1 
> 4 | Active | ZYPP | SUSE-Linux-10.1-Updates   
> | ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/update/10.1/   
> 5 | Active | ZYPP | 
> SUSE-Linux-10.1-CD-download-x86_64-10.1-0-20060517-172513 | 
> dvd:///?alias=SUSE-Linux-10.1-CD-download-x86_64-10.1-0-20060517-172513
> 6 | Active | ZYPP | 20060517-180334
>
> Before you tell me about the dups, in Yast Installation Sources (which 
> again takes quite some time to show up completely) I have the 
> following:
> On Off SUSE Linux 10.1 dvd:///
> Off On YUM 
> ftp://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/mirrors/ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/update/10.1
> On On YUM dir:///media/extra/data/data/opensuse/packman/10.1
> On On YUM ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/update/10.1
>
> The first update was added manually, while during registration it added 
> the last one (it failed to detect a mirror for me). 
> So in this case it cannot be about downloading a huge XML file or 
> something like that.

So, remove the dups to speed up...
>
> The system is an update from 10.0 in several steps through some beta's 
> and RC's.

We have to handle that better,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126


pgpU5GAO5YV9E.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Andras Mantia
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 14:11, Andras Mantia wrote:
> - parse-metadata is:
This was not pasted in...

/usr/lib64/zmd/parse-metadata /var/lib/zmd/zmd.db zypp 
dir:///media/extra/data/data/opensuse/packman/10.1/ 
dir:///media/extra/data/data/opensuse/packman/10.1/ 
dir:///media/extra/data/data/opensuse/packman/10.1/

or

/usr/lib64/zmd/parse-metadata /var/lib/zmd/zmd.db zypp 
dvd:///?alias=SUSE-Linux-10.1-CD-download-x86_64-10.1-0-20060517-172513 
dvd:///?alias=SUSE-Linux-10.1-CD-download-x86_64-10.1-0-20060517-172513 
dvd:///?alias=SUSE-Linux-10.1-CD-download-x86_64-10.1-0-20060517-172513


Andras

-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org


pgpc4rfUQ6PN4.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse-factory] Update stack test build

2006-05-24 Thread houghi
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:12:38PM +0200, houghi wrote:
> `rug sl` gave me a time of 1.086 seconds (previously 12 minutes)
> Just to be sure that there was nothing left in a cache, I rebooted. Then 
> it took about 2.4 seconds. I will leave the machine on for a few hours and
> see if there is any change

Waited more then one hour. and ran rug sl again. parse-metadata took
85-95% of the CPU. zmd the rest till 99%. The time it took i just saw
'Waking up ZMD' and no real indication something was going on. The time it
took now was 7.21 minutescrontab

I will see what putting it in crontab every 20 minutes does.
-- 
houghi  http://houghi.org   http://www.plainfaqs.org/linux/
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
>
>   Today I went outside. My pupils have never been tinier...

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] regedit for linux?

2006-05-24 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi,

"Regedit for Linux" is called "PSGML for Emacs" I think ;-)
But XML is what ".ini" Files were for Windows 3.x: The larger the system, the 
larger the files, and the slower access. Furthermore there was a "locking for 
updates" problem. Seems we all have it back with XML.

I really wonder if there's any benefit of XML compared to ASN.1 BER for the 
typical applications. An XML line with a length some 10kB isn't really "human-
readable".

Ulrich


On 24 May 2006 at 10:13, Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:

> Maybe someone can help me out of some of my bad feelings I am having
> around putting config data into XML files. One of the striking
> advantages (and used in day-to-day work almost daily) of linux versus
> windows was the use of plain text files for basically anything
> concerning system or application configuration. Putting more and more
> config data into XML files makes me worry if we are not going the
> "registry way" where reading, interpreting and changing config data
> becomes more and more a programmers job. Not that I hate the idea to
> create more and more higher qualified jobs around linux and the creation
> of the LCE (Linux Certified Engineer) position for simple system
> administration tasks. It might just raise the hurdle to switch to linux
> if the thing gets as confusing in administration as windows.
> 
> Yes, XML is a "open" standard, compared to Windows registry. But in real
> life tasks it does not matter.
> 
> FMF
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread jdd

houghi wrote:

On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 05:55:18AM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:


Real problem is that during beta testing there were no [EMAIL PROTECTED] update
servers available for testing, just a new beta every week, so none
of the Zen stuff (practically the only reason for the 10.1 release)
ever got any testing.



It would be indeed helpfull if there would be an update directory
available on factory. This directory does not need to have any security
rpms, but to test updates, some RPM's and scripts and whatever would be
nice.

"Changes" can be done to just textfiles, like the 'Release Notes' and the
like. Just one of each type of update that is possible. (complete RPM,
delta RPM, script, ...)

That way we can test the concept and see what happens.


and updated any hour... (if small, not a problem)
jdd

--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] regedit for linux?

2006-05-24 Thread jdd

Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:


advantages (and used in day-to-day work almost daily) of linux versus
windows was the use of plain text files for basically anything
concerning system or application configuration. Putting more and more
config data into XML files makes me worry if we are not going the



jdd


--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Andras Mantia
On Tuesday 23 May 2006 12:24, Anders Norrbring wrote:
> Apparently it's the wake-up of Zen that takes forever..
Yeah: AMD64 3200+, 1GB RAM: 

Waking up ZMD takes minutes (4 minutes ) and the top processes are 
parse-metadata and gpg:

- gpg something like:
gpg --no-default-keyring --quiet --no-tty --no-greeting 
--no-permission-warning --status-fd 1 --homedir /var/tmp/TmpDir.9ivB2c 
--import /var/lib/zypp/cache/Source.aDBK1K/DATA/content.key

- parse-metadata is:


I *did not* used an FTP source and when I started "rlug sl" my internet 
connection was down (dial-up...):
rug sl
Waking up ZMD...Done

# | Status | Type | Name  
| URI
--++--+---+---
1 | Active | ZYPP | SUSE-Linux-CD-OSS-x86_64-10.1-0-20060414-082827   
| 
cd:///?devices=/dev/hdc,/dev/hdd;alias=SUSE-Linux-CD-OSS-x86_64-10.1-0-20060414-082827
2 | Active | ZYPP | SUSE-Linux-add-on-CD-10.1-0-20060423-180936   
| 
cd:///?devices=/dev/hdc,/dev/hdd;alias=SUSE-Linux-add-on-CD-10.1-0-20060423-180936
3 | Active | ZYPP | 20060516-193554   
| ftp://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/mirrors/ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/update/10.1 
4 | Active | ZYPP | SUSE-Linux-10.1-Updates   
| ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/update/10.1/   
5 | Active | ZYPP | 
SUSE-Linux-10.1-CD-download-x86_64-10.1-0-20060517-172513 | 
dvd:///?alias=SUSE-Linux-10.1-CD-download-x86_64-10.1-0-20060517-172513
6 | Active | ZYPP | 20060517-180334

Before you tell me about the dups, in Yast Installation Sources (which 
again takes quite some time to show up completely) I have the 
following:
On Off SUSE Linux 10.1 dvd:///
Off On YUM 
ftp://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/mirrors/ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/update/10.1
On On YUM dir:///media/extra/data/data/opensuse/packman/10.1
On On YUM ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/update/10.1

The first update was added manually, while during registration it added 
the last one (it failed to detect a mirror for me). 
So in this case it cannot be about downloading a huge XML file or 
something like that.

rug ca

Sub'd? | Name  | 
Service
---+---+--
   | SUSE-Linux-CD-OSS-x86_64-10.1-0-20060414-082827   | 
SUSE-Linux-CD-OSS-x86_64-10.1-0-20060414-082827
   | SUSE-Linux-add-on-CD-10.1-0-20060423-180936   | 
SUSE-Linux-add-on-CD-10.1-0-20060423-180936
Yes| 20060516-193554   | 
20060516-193554
Yes| 20060517-180334   | 
20060517-180334
Yes| SUSE-Linux-10.1-CD-download-x86_64-10.1-0-20060517-172513 | 
SUSE-Linux-10.1-CD-download-x86_64-10.1-0-20060517-172513
Yes| SUSE-Linux-10.1-Updates   | 
SUSE-Linux-10.1-Updates


The system is an update from 10.0 in several steps through some beta's 
and RC's.

Andras

-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org


pgpFEtNWmgA4S.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [opensuse-factory] Update stack test build

2006-05-24 Thread houghi
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 10:34:15AM +0100, Graham Anderson wrote:
> Morning folks,
> 
> Would this list be the best place to post feedback regarding the test build 
> of 
> the update stack packages you posted yesterday Andreas? Or is it better moved 
> to bugzilla...? If so I can move all this to bugzilla with logs etc.

Perhaps as not to clutter bugzilla first things here and if something
interesting comes up, people can ask to move that to bugzilla.

My experience:
This is how most likely an avarge user will see what is going on. I am not
a KDE user, nor do I have any real understanding of zen, as I always used
YaST and YOU. I hope that some steps I do are extremely stupid, as they 
will be the steps that Joe Sixpack will also do and perhaps come up with 
the same questions.

I did the update with the updater in the KDE taskbar. At the end I got
that zmd was not running. This took very long.

Next I noticed that the updater icon was gone. I did a `rczmd restart`
and still no icon in the taskbar. As I have no idea how (or if) the icon
should come back, I did a reboot. After the update the taskbar again
showed the icon.

I then added Packman and Guru with YaST as FTP. I then added the same as 
http with the Software updater icon in the KDE taskbar. I also tried to 
add the repo from Robert Schiele and that did not work. I will see the 
others later if they work or not.

`rug sl` gave me a time of 1.086 seconds (previously 12 minutes)
Just to be sure that there was nothing left in a cache, I rebooted. Then 
it took about 2.4 seconds. I will leave the machine on for a few hours and
see if there is any change

-- 
houghi  http://houghi.org   http://www.plainfaqs.org/linux/
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
>
>   Today I went outside. My pupils have never been tinier...

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Update stack test build

2006-05-24 Thread Frank-Michael Fischer
Graham Anderson wrote:
> This has the side effect of a full service refresh will run if my system is 
> booted outside of the hourly maintenance window, parse-metadata and 
> update-status hogging 100% CPU for a few minutes on boot. If i reboot my 
> system inside the hourly maintenance window this does not happen.
>   

viz bug 177758, a "few" minutes may turn into 30.

FMF


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse-factory] Update stack test build

2006-05-24 Thread Graham Anderson
Morning folks,

Would this list be the best place to post feedback regarding the test build of 
the update stack packages you posted yesterday Andreas? Or is it better moved 
to bugzilla...? If so I can move all this to bugzilla with logs etc.

Here are my observations so far anyway. 

1. 
The 10.1 release update stack successfully installed the test builds after I 
added the URL as a YUM service via zen-updater. However the whole upgrade 
took an extremely long time ( 15 minutes  approx ). I was unable to determine 
why it was taking so long, i dont *think* it was the downloading...

2. 
Adding services via rug is just fine, and as per the 10.1 release builds ZYPP 
services are synced with YaST, YUM services are not. Adding services via 
zen-updater, same as rug, it works and the synching is the same.

2. Adding a larger service such as main online installation from 
mirror( inst-sources ) is much smoother. The service itself was added to the 
list in yast inst_sources almost instantaneously and unlilke the 10.1 release 
the catalog was not immediately downloaded but was only fetched when the 
finish button was pressed. At a rough guess I would say the whole process of 
adding the main installation source is 50% quicker now.

3. 
ZMD scheduling seems to be a bit broken now. It appears that the service 
refresh happens at the same time as the hourly maintenance, even though it is 
scheduled for the next day. Once the full service refresh and maintenance has 
run ( hourly by default it seems ) the schedule is reset with an updated time 
for the service refresh 24 hours later and 1 hour later for the maintenance. 
Of course the service refresh still happens one hour later and another new 
time i scheduled for it.

This has the side effect of a full service refresh will run if my system is 
booted outside of the hourly maintenance window, parse-metadata and 
update-status hogging 100% CPU for a few minutes on boot. If i reboot my 
system inside the hourly maintenance window this does not happen.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread houghi
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 05:55:18AM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Real problem is that during beta testing there were no [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> update
> servers available for testing, just a new beta every week, so none
> of the Zen stuff (practically the only reason for the 10.1 release)
> ever got any testing.

It would be indeed helpfull if there would be an update directory
available on factory. This directory does not need to have any security
rpms, but to test updates, some RPM's and scripts and whatever would be
nice.

"Changes" can be done to just textfiles, like the 'Release Notes' and the
like. Just one of each type of update that is possible. (complete RPM,
delta RPM, script, ...)

That way we can test the concept and see what happens.
-- 
houghi  http://houghi.org   http://www.plainfaqs.org/linux/
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
>
>   Today I went outside. My pupils have never been tinier...

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[opensuse-factory] regedit for linux?

2006-05-24 Thread Frank-Michael Fischer
Maybe someone can help me out of some of my bad feelings I am having
around putting config data into XML files. One of the striking
advantages (and used in day-to-day work almost daily) of linux versus
windows was the use of plain text files for basically anything
concerning system or application configuration. Putting more and more
config data into XML files makes me worry if we are not going the
"registry way" where reading, interpreting and changing config data
becomes more and more a programmers job. Not that I hate the idea to
create more and more higher qualified jobs around linux and the creation
of the LCE (Linux Certified Engineer) position for simple system
administration tasks. It might just raise the hurdle to switch to linux
if the thing gets as confusing in administration as windows.

Yes, XML is a "open" standard, compared to Windows registry. But in real
life tasks it does not matter.

FMF


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Bug 177758

2006-05-24 Thread Ulrich Windl
On 23 May 2006 at 18:39, Andreas Jaeger wrote:

[...]
> > Would be interesting to do some profiling on parse-metadata.
> > Anything available for Mono ?
> 
> parse-metadata is in C++.
[...]

Hi,

some time ago I was reflecting on how to boost performance on a Pentium Pro 200 
MHz with 128MB RAM. I concluded that today's programming language and -style 
suffers from needless copying of data (not to talk about needless calling of 
code), making the relatively fast CPU cache quite useless. As a proof on 
concept I 
wrote a sample program that does very aggressive data sharing (kind of "copy on 
write"). The performance is really great (I did unpack MIME messages): It's 
about 
a factor of 1000 faster than PINE. However: Data inter-dependencies are 
terrible, 
and it's a maintenance pain.

Performance sample (on a P4 2.8GHz meanwhile): base64-decoding 9219kB (includes 
reading the source (most likely cached, however) and writing the output): 
0.161s 
(elapsed! time (wall time))

Now for XML... ;-)

Regards,
Ulrich


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]