Re: [OS-webwork] whens the next beta release?
Sure thing -- so far beta2 has had 45 issues resolves -- if I moved the remaining 25 to beta3 that'd be 42 open issues to resolve in beta3. I think we're at a good point to release beta2 tonight. So i'll try to resolve anything I can in the next few minutes and then cut a build. -Pat - Original Message - From: Robert Douglass [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:18 PM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] whens the next beta release? +1 for another beta. That guarantees that people can grab a .jar of the latest changes, instead of having to build it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Francisco Hernandez Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OS-webwork] whens the next beta release? just wondering if theres an eta on the next beta release? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] whens the next beta release?
I'll buy the champaign! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pat Lightbody Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 8:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] whens the next beta release? Sure thing -- so far beta2 has had 45 issues resolves -- if I moved the remaining 25 to beta3 that'd be 42 open issues to resolve in beta3. I think we're at a good point to release beta2 tonight. So i'll try to resolve anything I can in the next few minutes and then cut a build. -Pat - Original Message - From: Robert Douglass [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:18 PM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] whens the next beta release? +1 for another beta. That guarantees that people can grab a .jar of the latest changes, instead of having to build it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Francisco Hernandez Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OS-webwork] whens the next beta release? just wondering if theres an eta on the next beta release? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Type conversion
Title: Message Thanks for all the support on WW! I always get very helpful responses from this group. - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 2:50 PM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Type conversion -Original Message-From: John Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:42 AMTo: WebworkSubject: [OS-webwork] Type conversion What is happening with the type conversion functionality? I need to be able to override the conversion both to and from string easily. xwork-conversion.properties only allows me to specify one way. If you specify a converter for the one direction and itis trying to convert from your type TO aString, it will also try to use that same converter (so make them bidirectional) Is there any plans to allow you to configure a converter seperatly for each property? For example, I have several dates which appear on a page in different formats. It would be great to be able to specify in xwork.xml the format to be used for each property. Or would this be best handled in a tag lib (to presentation specific)? This canbe done now. You would have aMyAction-conversion.properties which specifies the conversions for this specific class (by field name).I'm not sure if Pat has fully documented this? Maybe if the PropertyTag had a format attribute which was somehow passed to the TypeConverter... ww:property value="startDate" format="dd MMM "/ ...or something like that. John. Also on the type conversion front... I checked in yesterday a change to make type conversion problems add field errors to your Action... let me know if it's working for you. Jason
[OS-webwork] Flash Blogs
http://www.gregburch.com/blog/ http://www.danieldura.com http://www.flogspot.com http://www.gskinner.com/blog/ http://www.illogicz.com/blog/ http://radio.weblogs.com/0113297/ http://www.joshdura.com http://www.markme.com/techsales/ http://www.markme.com/mesh/ http://www.swfoo.com/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
[OS-webwork] Re: Flash Blogs - SORRY for the spam
I wasn't written this mail for the webwork mailing list. I've simply made a mistake with my mail client. Sorry. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository
I need to look into the code but the date picker component works fine with IE, its just Mozilla thats crapping out with it Pat Lightbody wrote: Looks like a problem with the absolute/relative paths -- should be trivial to fix. - Original Message - From: Francisco Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:18 PM Subject: Re: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository im using the latest firdbird myself too, when i click on the arrows to goto the next/previous month/year I get this: 404 Not Found Resource /cart/templates/xhtml/calendar/templates/xhtml/calendar/calendar.html not found on this server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really?! I expected the other way around, as I developed/tested this using Mozilla Firebird 0.6! :) What does the JavaScript console shows? -Mensagem original- De: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: terça-feira, 30 de setembro de 2003 15:51 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: Re: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository uh oh, I tried it in Mozilla, and it fails, but works great in IE! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, the date picker is here: http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-329 Have fun, and if there are any suggestions, feel free to add them. Peace, -cv -Mensagem original- *De:* Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Enviada em:* terça-feira, 30 de setembro de 2003 10:19 *Para:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Assunto:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository If people add them to Jira issues, we'll put them in CVS to go into the distribution... -Original Message- *From:* Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:01 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository Sure, JIRA is fine, or you can email me at drew (at) lowerunit dot com (trying to avoid getting more spam). I've been looking for one of these for a long time. It's especially helpful to have a ww component. Any idea on if a component repository will be created, and if so, where it will go on CVS? A great component repository would really help sell webwork to a lot of people, hitting a nice sweet spot between tapestry and struts. Thanks, Drew -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, September 29, 2003 5:30 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository Hi Drew! I just finished mine, and it's working quite well with european (dd/mm/) dates. Should be a breeze to modify them for the american/british format (mm/dd/). How should I send it to you? Maybe create an issue in JIRA and attach it? -cv -Mensagem original- *De:* Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Enviada em:* sábado, 27 de setembro de 2003 14:51 *Para:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Assunto:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository If someone has a datepicker component available, I would love to get access to it right away. -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Jason Carreira *Sent:* Friday, September 26, 2003 11:46 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository I think they should go right into WW2 CVS... Sounds like a great idea. -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Friday, September 26, 2003 10:47 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* [OS-webwork] Component repository Hi all, Do you think it would be a good idea to set up a component repository somewhere? I'm creating some components here, and I started feeling that creating a date picker or tree component would be reinventing the wheel somehow. IMHO, I think having a good component repository would be a huge plus for WW2 users, as they could just slap them together and create wicked cool forms with dynamic behaviour in minutes. I'm sure this was already discussed at some point, but as I couldn't find any references to it on the mailing list archives, it sounded like a good idea to bring this subject back again. If you're interested, I'd suggest having a look at http://webfx.eae.net - there are some awesome components
Re: [OS-webwork] WW2 Tags in SiteMesh decorators
There is no need to make the ActionTag keep the ActionContext around -- that's really unhealthy. However -- what we could do is put the ActionContext in a request attribute and then use that in all our tags -- that would solve it perfectly. Here's a visual of the problem that I quickly put together in fireworks (be amazed by my awesome graphics ability): http://www.lightbody.net/webwork_flow.png So I suppose we could make all our tags get the AC from the request rather than the ThreadLocal. Hehe, I recall this is one of the reasons I opted for not having ActionContext a ThreadLocal, but I was voted down ;) (no, I don't really want to debate this again, it's staying as a TL for the foreseeable future) -Pat - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 6:16 AM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WW2 Tags in SiteMesh decorators What are you trying to do in your decorators? If you access things in the request, where the Action will be bound with its id, you can push this action onto the ValueStack using the ww:push tag and use all of the other tags as normal. I don't think we're going to make the ActionTag leave its ActionContext out there. It needs to be returned to the original. -Original Message- From: Frederick N. Brier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WW2 Tags in SiteMesh decorators This is exactly what I got working this weekend with my change to the ww:action tag. I am using Webwork2 with SItemesh. My Action class is populated via the interceptors and an IoC component and populates the header.jsp referenced in my Sitemesh decorator default.jsp with a ww:property from the Action. The reason it didn't work originally was the ActionTag wipes out own ActionContext issue, now in Jira. Fred. At 03:38 PM 9/29/2003, you wrote: SiteMesh parses the HTML from WW and extract the meta tags, the title and the content of the page. It then decorates the page using a template. Jérôme. Jason Carreira wrote: Well, I'm not really familiar with Sitemesh's internals, but the filter could be processing before and/or after the request reaches the Servlet... -Original Message- From: Jerome BERNARD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WW2 Tags in SiteMesh decorators I think this is the other way around: SiteMesh wraps the output from WW into a decorated HTML page. Regards, Jérôme. Jason Carreira wrote: The problem is that Sitemesh is a filter, so it operates before any WebWork code, so nothing is set up. I'm not sure of a solution... Jason -Original Message- From: Vincent Faidherbe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 4:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OS-webwork] WW2 Tags in SiteMesh decorators It seems that it isn't possible to use WW2 tags in SiteMesh decorators because tags suchs ww:property or ww:iterator fail to rerieve the ValueStack from the ActionContext. I had a the same issue in a home-made tag but I fixed the problem by replacing the call ActionContext.getContext().getValueStack() by (OgnlValueStack)request.getAttribute(webwork.valueStack ). I think it should be an issue related to the fact that the ActionContext is thread-local variable. Any idea? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Hi Cameron,
The more I think about the CoolURIServletDispatcher, the more I think it is too
much limited. For example I changed the abbreviation syntax from:
http://myhost.com/article/paramValue1 to
http://myhost.com/article/articleID/paramValue1 instead of
http://myhost.com/article/article/paramValue1 .
Why?
Simply because most of the time your action are written that way:
public class LoadArticleAction extends ActionSupport {
long articleID;
Article article;
// getter setter for the above members
// other methods omitted...
}
If you use a parameter named article (by using the same parameter name as the
one from the action) then you will need to use weird method names in order to
retreive the real object linked to this id.
Anyway, I think we should write a custom ServletDispatcher that reads advanced
mapping configuration from another xml file (or perhaps extends webwork.xml?).
This file could allow to use the sheme explained above but also deal with URL
including dates (like http://myhost.com/2003/10/02).
What do you think about this?
Jérôme.
Selon Cameron Braid [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have madea patch to the servlet dispatcher to allow for extensability
:
the methods that can be overriden are
protected void sendError(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse
response, int code, Exception e)
protected Map getParameterMap(HttpServletRequest request)
protected Map getSessionMap(HttpServletRequest request)
protected Map getApplicationMap()
protected String getActionName(HttpServletRequest request)
protected String getNameSpace(HttpServletRequest request)
this will allow for the core logic in the service method to be re-used
from custom servlet based dispatchers, allowing a custom URL and
parameter mapping scheme to be implemented.
Pat / Jason / Others : do we want to include the
CoolUriServletDispatcher in the core ?
If so, I will modify it to extend the new ServletDispatcher.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerome BERNARD
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 4:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Hum... I should have a closer look at IDEA then :-)
Jérôme.
Cameron Braid wrote:
What IDE do you use ?
Eclispe can automatically create delegator calls for you,
which makes
tasks like that a piece of cake.
Cam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerome BERNARD
Sent: Monday, 29 September 2003 7:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Cameron Braid wrote:
Cool idea :)
Though, for the implementaion, wouldn't you have been better
to use the
wrapper pattern, rather than dynamic proxies :)
Sure. I thought about it, but it's quite painful: you have to
override
so many methods :-(
I'll do it tomorrow and update the attachment in the JIRA issue.
Jérôme.
Cam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jérôme BERNARD
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 1:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
I have created a new issue in JIRA
(http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-326
) and submitted a new servlet that extends ServletDispatcher
and provides such a functionality. I also provided a way to
shorten even more the URL by assuming that if the first
parameter name is not specified then it is supposed to be the
name of the action.
This allows to replace the following URL
http://myhost.com/article/article/123
with this URL http://myhost.com/article/123.
Any code review welcomed! :-p
Jérôme.
Robert Douglass [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think this is the relevant code, from
org.apache.turbine.util.parser.DefaultParameterParser. As I
understand
it, Turbine folks avoid URLs like foo/bar?id=1812 in favor of
foo/bar/id/1812. I've never used this, and I can't remember
right off
exactly how the servlet container knows which part is the
path info,
but essentially, they assume that the path info follows
the pattern
name_1/value_1/...name_n/value_n. The advantage is
supposed to be
search-engine friendly URLs from completely dynamic
applications. This
gets touted by the Turbine community as a great feature
(and it may
be). I'd love to have this available, but as you can see
below, it is
easy enough to implement that anyone can do it as soon
Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
does the CoolUriDispatcher handle passing arrays like when using
multiple checkboxes or multiple selected select tags?
also whats going to happen if you have a textfield that its value is
03/17/1990
also I think a CoolUrlTag would make sense to have aswell to write out
the Urls just like ww:url does now but in the new Cool format
Jérôme BERNARD wrote:
Hi Cameron,
The more I think about the CoolURIServletDispatcher, the more I think it is too
much limited. For example I changed the abbreviation syntax from:
http://myhost.com/article/paramValue1 to
http://myhost.com/article/articleID/paramValue1 instead of
http://myhost.com/article/article/paramValue1 .
Why?
Simply because most of the time your action are written that way:
public class LoadArticleAction extends ActionSupport {
long articleID;
Article article;
// getter setter for the above members
// other methods omitted...
}
If you use a parameter named article (by using the same parameter name as the
one from the action) then you will need to use weird method names in order to
retreive the real object linked to this id.
Anyway, I think we should write a custom ServletDispatcher that reads advanced
mapping configuration from another xml file (or perhaps extends webwork.xml?).
This file could allow to use the sheme explained above but also deal with URL
including dates (like http://myhost.com/2003/10/02).
What do you think about this?
Jérôme.
Selon Cameron Braid [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have madea patch to the servlet dispatcher to allow for extensability
:
the methods that can be overriden are
protected void sendError(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse
response, int code, Exception e)
protected Map getParameterMap(HttpServletRequest request)
protected Map getSessionMap(HttpServletRequest request)
protected Map getApplicationMap()
protected String getActionName(HttpServletRequest request)
protected String getNameSpace(HttpServletRequest request)
this will allow for the core logic in the service method to be re-used
from custom servlet based dispatchers, allowing a custom URL and
parameter mapping scheme to be implemented.
Pat / Jason / Others : do we want to include the
CoolUriServletDispatcher in the core ?
If so, I will modify it to extend the new ServletDispatcher.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerome BERNARD
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 4:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Hum... I should have a closer look at IDEA then :-)
Jérôme.
Cameron Braid wrote:
What IDE do you use ?
Eclispe can automatically create delegator calls for you,
which makes
tasks like that a piece of cake.
Cam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerome BERNARD
Sent: Monday, 29 September 2003 7:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Cameron Braid wrote:
Cool idea :)
Though, for the implementaion, wouldn't you have been better
to use the
wrapper pattern, rather than dynamic proxies :)
Sure. I thought about it, but it's quite painful: you have to
override
so many methods :-(
I'll do it tomorrow and update the attachment in the JIRA issue.
Jérôme.
Cam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jérôme BERNARD
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 1:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
I have created a new issue in JIRA
(http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-326
) and submitted a new servlet that extends ServletDispatcher
and provides such a functionality. I also provided a way to
shorten even more the URL by assuming that if the first
parameter name is not specified then it is supposed to be the
name of the action.
This allows to replace the following URL
http://myhost.com/article/article/123
with this URL http://myhost.com/article/123.
Any code review welcomed! :-p
Jérôme.
Robert Douglass [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think this is the relevant code, from
org.apache.turbine.util.parser.DefaultParameterParser. As I
understand
it, Turbine folks avoid URLs like foo/bar?id=1812 in favor of
foo/bar/id/1812. I've never used this, and I can't remember
right off
exactly how the servlet container knows which part is the
path info,
but essentially, they assume that the path info follows
the pattern
name_1/value_1/...name_n/value_n. The advantage is
supposed to be
search-engine friendly URLs from completely dynamic
applications. This
gets touted by the Turbine community as a great feature
(and it may
be). I'd love to have this available, but as you can see
below, it is
easy enough to implement that anyone can do it as soon
as they want
it. I don't
Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Selon Francisco Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
does the CoolUriDispatcher handle passing arrays like when using
multiple checkboxes or multiple selected select tags?
Nope.
It splits the URL on '/' delimiters. It then decides whether the token is the
name of the action to execute, the parameter name or the parameter value.
also whats going to happen if you have a textfield that its value is
03/17/1990
This will clearly fail! I am wondering though if the CoolURIServletDispatcher
should be used with such a kind of parameter values. For example if you would
like to display articles published on 03/17/1990, you should instead stick to
this kind of URL: http://myhost.com/1990/03/17 . Why? Simply because one would
expect http://myhost.com/1990/03 to display the articles from this months and so
on...
also I think a CoolUrlTag would make sense to have aswell to write out
the Urls just like ww:url does now but in the new Cool format
As I said, I am not sure this is really needed. After all, Cool URIs are meant
to be at least URIs that would stay and not change when the site
organization/content/technology change. So why would you like to dynamically
build those URLs? I mean what would you expect the CoolUrlTag to do that you
can't do with the ww:url one?
Jérôme.
Jérôme BERNARD wrote:
Hi Cameron,
The more I think about the CoolURIServletDispatcher, the more I think it is
too
much limited. For example I changed the abbreviation syntax from:
http://myhost.com/article/paramValue1 to
http://myhost.com/article/articleID/paramValue1 instead of
http://myhost.com/article/article/paramValue1 .
Why?
Simply because most of the time your action are written that way:
public class LoadArticleAction extends ActionSupport {
long articleID;
Article article;
// getter setter for the above members
// other methods omitted...
}
If you use a parameter named article (by using the same parameter name as
the
one from the action) then you will need to use weird method names in order
to
retreive the real object linked to this id.
Anyway, I think we should write a custom ServletDispatcher that reads
advanced
mapping configuration from another xml file (or perhaps extends
webwork.xml?).
This file could allow to use the sheme explained above but also deal with
URL
including dates (like http://myhost.com/2003/10/02).
What do you think about this?
Jérôme.
Selon Cameron Braid [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have madea patch to the servlet dispatcher to allow for extensability
:
the methods that can be overriden are
protected void sendError(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse
response, int code, Exception e)
protected Map getParameterMap(HttpServletRequest request)
protected Map getSessionMap(HttpServletRequest request)
protected Map getApplicationMap()
protected String getActionName(HttpServletRequest request)
protected String getNameSpace(HttpServletRequest request)
this will allow for the core logic in the service method to be re-used
from custom servlet based dispatchers, allowing a custom URL and
parameter mapping scheme to be implemented.
Pat / Jason / Others : do we want to include the
CoolUriServletDispatcher in the core ?
If so, I will modify it to extend the new ServletDispatcher.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerome BERNARD
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 4:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Hum... I should have a closer look at IDEA then :-)
Jérôme.
Cameron Braid wrote:
What IDE do you use ?
Eclispe can automatically create delegator calls for you,
which makes
tasks like that a piece of cake.
Cam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerome BERNARD
Sent: Monday, 29 September 2003 7:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Cameron Braid wrote:
Cool idea :)
Though, for the implementaion, wouldn't you have been better
to use the
wrapper pattern, rather than dynamic proxies :)
Sure. I thought about it, but it's quite painful: you have to
override
so many methods :-(
I'll do it tomorrow and update the attachment in the JIRA issue.
Jérôme.
Cam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jérôme BERNARD
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 1:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
I have created a new issue in JIRA
(http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-326
) and submitted a new servlet that extends ServletDispatcher
and provides such a functionality. I also provided a way to
shorten even more the URL by assuming that if the first
parameter name is
Re: [OS-webwork] Application Components
Hi, No, the application-scoped resource won't be loaded until it's needed (lazy) Ouch! But is there some way to get my object instanciated BEFORE I need it? explaining ... my application-scoped resource does a lot of initializations that turns the first action execution into a big pacience test. thanks + Samuel G. Mota + [EMAIL PROTECTED] + 55 (11) 4417 7093 + Business Application Dpt. + Netset Serviços em Tecnologia + a Hypercom Company + http://www.hypercom.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Type conversion
Indeed this seems to be the best solution to the common text formatting problem... ww:property value=formateDate(startDate,'dd MMM ')/ Thanks. But it does point out that the current type conversion scheme is very limited as a text formatting mechanism. Property based format configuration is adequate for text input (ie from html forms) but an approach similar to the code above is necessary for output (ie into the view). Maybe it would be better to not use this TypeConverter functionality for the textual output of to views. The TypeConverter approach does not allow for the different types of formatting that may be required in a view. For example, to output a date as both a time part and a date part or to shorten a long description String into an short abstract. For these types of formatting issues maybe a new formatting API should be created that can be controlled at the view level directly with tags. But for now I will roll my own text formatting like the above. John - Original Message - From: Francisco Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 8:10 PM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Type conversion I would probably just put a formatDate() method in my BaseAction class and use something like: ww:property value=formateDate(startDate,'dd MMM ')/ John Patterson wrote: What is happening with the type conversion functionality? I need to be able to override the conversion both to and from string easily. xwork-conversion.properties only allows me to specify one way. Is there any plans to allow you to configure a converter seperatly for each property? For example, I have several dates which appear on a page in different formats. It would be great to be able to specify in xwork.xml the format to be used for each property. Or would this be best handled in a tag lib (to presentation specific)? Maybe if the PropertyTag had a format attribute which was somehow passed to the TypeConverter... ww:property value=startDate format=dd MMM / ...or something like that. John. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Application Components
Having not read the whole thread, would it be possible for you to make that component implement ServletContextListener as well? Then do the initializations in contextInitialized? Mathias has something like this, in that it uses ww2's IoC, but the class isn't a component in any of the different scopes. The example is here: http://blogs.atlassian.com/scuttlebutt/java/OptimizeIndexListener.java Or, just write a servletContextListener that calls the required methods on the component. Just an some ideas. If anyone sees something wrong with this, let me know... :) /rick Samuel Mota wrote: Hi, No, the application-scoped resource won't be loaded until it's needed (lazy) Ouch! But is there some way to get my object instanciated BEFORE I need it? explaining ... my application-scoped resource does a lot of initializations that turns the first action execution into a big pacience test. thanks + Samuel G. Mota + [EMAIL PROTECTED] + 55 (11) 4417 7093 + Business Application Dpt. + Netset Servios em Tecnologia + a Hypercom Company + http://www.hypercom.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
[OS-webwork] Checkbox grouping?
Title: Checkbox grouping? Hi all, I gotta create a form like this: [ ] Foo [ ] Bar [ ] Baz [ ] Other: [ ] Being kind of a WW2 newbie, what would be the best way to do that? It'd be better if I could keep the other text filled in the textbox in the same place on the model (and thus, the model has a String property). Any ideas gladly appreciated! :) []'s -cv
RE: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
I have used cocoon before and they provide a cool url mapping techinque
using matchers.
I will have a think about how we can integrate something like that.
For example,
Syntax aside, I would like to be able to specify a match pattern of :
/action/year/month/day
to parse /article/2003/10/02
and get a map {action=article,year=2003,month=10,day=02}
Since we are trying to achive a permalink style URL, why are the
parameter names required in the URL ?
Also, for your original idea
/article/id/10 would probably be better written as /article/10 with a
matcher /(action)/(id)
This type of pattern will also allow for action namespaces
/namespace/action/id
Then /customer/sale/10 - namespace=customer, action=sale, id=10
Then /admin/vendor/sale/10 - namespace=/admin/vendor, action=sale,
id=10
Before we implement these ideas, what other types of URL's do we want to
try and map ?
Cameron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jérôme BERNARD
Sent: Thursday, 2 October 2003 7:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Hi Cameron,
The more I think about the CoolURIServletDispatcher, the more
I think it is too much limited. For example I changed the
abbreviation syntax from:
http://myhost.com/article/paramValue1 to
http://myhost.com/article/articleID/paramValue1 instead of
http://myhost.com/article/article/paramValue1 .
Why?
Simply because most of the time your action are written that way:
public class LoadArticleAction extends ActionSupport {
long articleID;
Article article;
// getter setter for the above members
// other methods omitted...
}
If you use a parameter named article (by using the same
parameter name as the one from the action) then you will need
to use weird method names in order to retreive the real
object linked to this id.
Anyway, I think we should write a custom ServletDispatcher
that reads advanced mapping configuration from another xml
file (or perhaps extends webwork.xml?).
This file could allow to use the sheme explained above but
also deal with URL including dates (like
http://myhost.com/2003/10/02).
What do you think about this?
Jérôme.
Selon Cameron Braid [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have madea patch to the servlet dispatcher to allow for
extensability
:
the methods that can be overriden are
protected void sendError(HttpServletRequest request,
HttpServletResponse response, int code, Exception e) protected Map
getParameterMap(HttpServletRequest request) protected Map
getSessionMap(HttpServletRequest request) protected Map
getApplicationMap() protected String
getActionName(HttpServletRequest
request) protected String getNameSpace(HttpServletRequest request)
this will allow for the core logic in the service method to
be re-used
from custom servlet based dispatchers, allowing a custom URL and
parameter mapping scheme to be implemented.
Pat / Jason / Others : do we want to include the
CoolUriServletDispatcher in the core ?
If so, I will modify it to extend the new ServletDispatcher.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerome BERNARD
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 4:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Hum... I should have a closer look at IDEA then :-)
Jérôme.
Cameron Braid wrote:
What IDE do you use ?
Eclispe can automatically create delegator calls for you,
which makes
tasks like that a piece of cake.
Cam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerome BERNARD
Sent: Monday, 29 September 2003 7:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Cameron Braid wrote:
Cool idea :)
Though, for the implementaion, wouldn't you have been better
to use the
wrapper pattern, rather than dynamic proxies :)
Sure. I thought about it, but it's quite painful: you have to
override so many methods :-(
I'll do it tomorrow and update the attachment in the JIRA issue.
Jérôme.
Cam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jérôme BERNARD
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 1:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
I have created a new issue in JIRA
(http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-326
) and submitted a new servlet that extends
ServletDispatcher and
provides such a functionality. I also provided a way
to shorten
even more the URL by assuming that if the first
parameter name
is not specified then it is
RE: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Selon Cameron Braid [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have used cocoon before and they provide a cool url mapping techinque
using matchers.
Yep. This is somehow the kind of thing WW should provide, but at a WW level,
meaning that we are not really dealing with pipeline but instead actions (or
action chains).
I will have a think about how we can integrate something like that.
For example,
Syntax aside, I would like to be able to specify a match pattern of :
/action/year/month/day
to parse /article/2003/10/02
and get a map {action=article,year=2003,month=10,day=02}
Since we are trying to achive a permalink style URL, why are the
parameter names required in the URL ?
Also, for your original idea
/article/id/10 would probably be better written as /article/10 with a
matcher /(action)/(id)
This type of pattern will also allow for action namespaces
/namespace/action/id
Then /customer/sale/10 - namespace=customer, action=sale, id=10
Then /admin/vendor/sale/10 - namespace=/admin/vendor, action=sale,
id=10
Before we implement these ideas, what other types of URL's do we want to
try and map ?
Have a look at the proposal I sent.
BTW, I do not know why but mails sent are delivered a few hours late...
Regards,
Jérôme.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
[OS-webwork] Testing actions
Hi,
I'm building a test case with JUnit, I'm trying to use the hole WW/XW engine ...
while trying to put an object into the session map I'm getting a NPE ...
At my action the code:
ActionContext.getContext().put(
ActionContext.SESSION,
ActionContext.getContext().
getSession().put(Static.USER_SESSION_KEY, user)
);
The setUp method from the test case:
protected void setUp() throws Exception {
super.setUp();
Static.setEnvironment();
XmlConfigurationProvider configurationProvider = new
XmlConfigurationProvider(
xwork.xml);
ConfigurationManager.clearConfigurationProviders();
ConfigurationManager.addConfigurationProvider(configurationProvider);
ConfigurationManager.getConfiguration().reload();
proxy = ActionProxyFactory.getFactory().createActionProxy(,login,null);
userLogin = (UserLogin) proxy.getAction();
}
One test method:
public void testInvalidLogin() throws Exception {
proxy.setExecuteResult(false);
userLogin.setCelulaTecnica(new Integer(1));
userLogin.setPassword(0);
assertEquals(Action.ERROR,proxy.execute());
assertTrue(userLogin.hasErrors());
}
How can I achive this?
thanks
+ Samuel G. Mota
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ 55 (11) 4417 7093
+ Business Application Dpt.
+ Netset Serviços em Tecnologia
+ a Hypercom Company
+ http://www.hypercom.com
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork2 newbie biting off more than I can chew...
Title: Message Sorry, I kept meaning to answer this email... -Original Message-From: Peter White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 10:11 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [OS-webwork] WebWork2 newbie biting off more than I can chew... Hi Gang! I'm still fairly new to WW2 and am using it for a contract project I'm working on. What I'm trying to do is pretty complex so I'm hoping to verify whether or not the framework has the built-in capability to support what I'm trying to do. If so, any pointers in the right direction would be greatly appreciated. I'll try to explain what I need to accomplish as clearly as possible without putting it in the application's context (sorry, I'm under NDA). Description of process: A dynamically generated web page is being submitted. This page contains groups of fields that are represented by different Java classes (All derived from the same Abstract base class). When my WW Action is called, my Action's execute() method will load the instance of the object that represents the form being submitted and it contains a List of AbstractBaseClass containing the classes that were represented on the form. I'm using Hibernate as my persistence layer and will have all the info I'll need to retrieve the form instance from the DB in a hidden field in the form being submitted. The 2 challenges, based on the above process, that I'm facing are as follows: 1) I'm used to extending ActionSupport and having WW2 "automagically" set all my attributes for me. This won't work since the attributes which need to be set will be the attributes contained in the List collection that will be retrieved from the DB via Hibernate. My thought on this is that each class contained in the List will have it's own implementation of a "getFormFields" method which would extract the field values from the request, and then I'd iterate through the list calling "getFormFields" on each object in the list - I'm assuming WW2 can't do anything automatically for me at this level. If that's not the case, I'd love to hear and better ways to implement this. If that's the only way to do what I need, which WW2 is the best class to extend for this purpose? 2) Validation - rather than using a validation interceptor, I'd still like to be able to use the Validation framework with a separate validation.xml file for each of the classes that could possibly be contained in the above mentioned list. However, I'm pretty sure the validationStack won't work for me here since the form being validated has a non-static structure. Once "getFormFields" from step #1 has been called, then I'd call something like "doValidate()" which would use XWork's validation framework to validate that populated object using it's class-specific validation rules. You can use theVisitorFieldValidator to havethe framework automatically validate all of the items in the list for you. I figure #1 is possible, worst case, by passing around the request object and extracting what I need from it. Unfortunately, I'm not so sure about #2. I'm going to take a look at com.opensymphony.xwork.validator.ValidationInterceptor when I get a chance to see how it's working it magic but I thought I'd fire this off in case anyone's done something similar. Thanks in advance! Peter
RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork2 newbie biting off more than I can chew...
Title: Message Which validators throw exceptions for null Strings? We have the RequiredFieldValidator which checks for null values, and the RequiredStringValidator also checks for empty Strings... The range validators are built to not check fields which are null (assuming you'll have a RequiredFieldValidator if you want to make it required). If you're getting exceptions, it's a bug and we need to fix it. -Original Message-From: Peter White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:37 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork2 newbie biting off more than I can chew... Hi Pat, My partner in crime on this project has been experimenting with the validation framework all day. He says it looks like we can do what we want with it with one minor exception (sorry, no pun intended here...) - the validation framework throws an exception if String attributes it's validatingare null. It sounds like this might be a bugbut we can workaround this by wrapping the String attributes so they return an empty String if they have null values before having them validated. Thanks for the ParameterAware tip, this would definitely be preferable to passing around and working with the request object directly. Regards, Peter
RE: [OS-webwork] Converters need to be unified
Title: Message Cool... now we need i18n localized validators if we switched from using the property files directly to using ResourceBundle's we could do this pretty easily... We also need to work on getting conversion to add field messages if it fails... -Original Message-From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:31 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Converters need to be unified Well -- there is xwork-default-conversion.properties and xwork-conversion.properties. So xwork-default-conversion.properties is in xwork.jar and then you can write your own xwork-conversion.properties that can override that. -Pat - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 11:25 AM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Converters need to be unified The xwork-default-conversion.properties does this, to some extent... Pat, it might be nice to be able to register other default conversion properties files (app specific)... -Original Message-From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 3:33 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [OS-webwork] Converters need to be unified I think WW2should give the ability to use converters (default and user-defined) easily from actions and views, from aunified entry point. It would be nice. Richard.
RE: [OS-webwork] Checkbox grouping?
Title: Message If the checkboxes are not selected, nothing will be sent for them You could name the check boxes and text field the same thing and you'd get a String[] with either 1 or 2 things in it (1 if no checkbox)... At least I think so... -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:07 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [OS-webwork] Checkbox grouping? Hi all, I gotta create a form like this: [ ] Foo [ ] Bar [ ] Baz [ ] Other: [ ] Being kind of a WW2 newbie, what would be the best way to do that? It'd be better if I could keep the "other" text filled in the textbox in the same place on the model (and thus, the model has a String property). Any ideas gladly appreciated! :) []'s -cv
Re: [OS-webwork] Application Components
Yeah -- any class, not just actions, can use the
IoC framework. I think the best bet would be to write a ServletContextListener
that implements FooAware (Foo is your resource you want to load up) and then
pulls out the application-scoped ComponentManager by doing:
context.getAttribute("DefaultComponentManager") and then calls init(this) on
it.
-Pat
- Original Message -
From:
Rick Salsa
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 7:00
AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Application
Components
Having not read the
whole thread, would it be possible for you to make that component implement
ServletContextListener as well? Then do the initializations in
contextInitialized? Mathias
has something like this, in that it uses ww2's IoC, but the class isn't a
component in any of the different scopes. The example is here:http://blogs.atlassian.com/scuttlebutt/java/OptimizeIndexListener.javaOr,
just write a servletContextListener that calls the required methods on the
component. Just an some ideas. If anyone sees something wrong with this, let
me know... :)/rickSamuel Mota wrote:
Hi,
No, the application-scoped resource won't be loaded until it's needed (lazy)
Ouch! But is there some way to get my object instanciated BEFORE I need it?
explaining ... my application-scoped resource does a lot of initializations that turns the first
action execution into a big pacience test.
thanks
+ Samuel G. Mota
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ 55 (11) 4417 7093
+ Business Application Dpt.
+ Netset Serviços em Tecnologia
+ a Hypercom Company
+ http://www.hypercom.com
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
[OS-webwork] Another quickie
Title: Another quickie
Hi all :)
First, thanks a lot to Jason for answering the previous question (checkbox grouping) so fast. Really helpful! :)
Now I'm creating one more component, a select box for gender, which should render something like this:
Gender: [Choose one... ][v]
In my Velocity template, I tried:
#tag(Select
label=gender name=gender value=gender
listKey={' ', 'M', 'F'}
listValue={'Choose one...', 'Male, 'Female'}
)
But, so far, no-no. I'm almost certain there's something wrong with the OGNL expressions, but reading the OGNL user's guide I couldn't find any evidence proving it. Any ideas? :)
[]'s
-cv
[OS-webwork] Accessing request parameters
Hi, I'm still looking for a way to access request parameters from WW2-tags, like in WW1 ww:property value=$foo/. The only thread about this issue in the mailing list is from june and unfortunatly it doesn't provide an answer. Is there any progress made in this area ? Thanks, Nils --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository
Here's another useful idea. How about a rich text editor component, to take the place of a textarea control? I've seen things like this on PHP message boards. It includes a formatting toolbar as well as the textarea itself, and works just like a miniature wordpad. I don't know how hard this would be to do as a component, but it would certainly be useful. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francisco Hernandez Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository I need to look into the code but the date picker component works fine with IE, its just Mozilla thats crapping out with it Pat Lightbody wrote: Looks like a problem with the absolute/relative paths -- should be trivial to fix. - Original Message - From: Francisco Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:18 PM Subject: Re: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository im using the latest firdbird myself too, when i click on the arrows to goto the next/previous month/year I get this: 404 Not Found Resource /cart/templates/xhtml/calendar/templates/xhtml/calendar/calendar.html not found on this server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really?! I expected the other way around, as I developed/tested this using Mozilla Firebird 0.6! :) What does the JavaScript console shows? -Mensagem original- De: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: terça-feira, 30 de setembro de 2003 15:51 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: Re: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository uh oh, I tried it in Mozilla, and it fails, but works great in IE! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, the date picker is here: http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-329 Have fun, and if there are any suggestions, feel free to add them. Peace, -cv -Mensagem original- *De:* Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Enviada em:* terça-feira, 30 de setembro de 2003 10:19 *Para:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Assunto:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository If people add them to Jira issues, we'll put them in CVS to go into the distribution... -Original Message- *From:* Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:01 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository Sure, JIRA is fine, or you can email me at drew (at) lowerunit dot com (trying to avoid getting more spam). I've been looking for one of these for a long time. It's especially helpful to have a ww component. Any idea on if a component repository will be created, and if so, where it will go on CVS? A great component repository would really help sell webwork to a lot of people, hitting a nice sweet spot between tapestry and struts. Thanks, Drew -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, September 29, 2003 5:30 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository Hi Drew! I just finished mine, and it's working quite well with european (dd/mm/) dates. Should be a breeze to modify them for the american/british format (mm/dd/). How should I send it to you? Maybe create an issue in JIRA and attach it? -cv -Mensagem original- *De:* Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Enviada em:* sábado, 27 de setembro de 2003 14:51 *Para:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Assunto:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository If someone has a datepicker component available, I would love to get access to it right away. -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Jason Carreira *Sent:* Friday, September 26, 2003 11:46 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository I think they should go right into WW2 CVS... Sounds like a great idea. -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Friday, September 26, 2003 10:47 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* [OS-webwork] Component repository Hi all, Do you think it would be a good idea to set up a component repository somewhere? I'm creating some components here, and I started feeling that creating a date picker or tree
Re: [OS-webwork] Accessing request parameters
The request parameters are in the valuestack, so I believe the syntax to search the stack is #foo. /rick Nils Hartmann wrote: Hi, I'm still looking for a way to access request parameters from WW2-tags, like in WW1 ww:property value="$foo"/. The only thread about this issue in the mailing list is from june and unfortunatly it doesn't provide an answer. Is there any progress made in this area ? Thanks, Nils --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
[OS-webwork] WW2 Tags vs. WW1.x Tags
Title: WW2 Tags vs. WW1.x Tags In general can one state that most if not all of the WW1.x tags work in WW2 or has there been a major overhaul? Thanks Kris Thompson
Re: [OS-webwork] Accessing request parameters
The request parameters are in the valuestack, so I believe the syntax to search the stack is #foo. It doesn't work for me. I call a jsp with http://myhost.com?foo=bla but ww:property value=#foo/ doesn't return the value. (Regardless whether the jsp is invoked directly or used as an action's result). The same in included pages. nils --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RES: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository
Title: RES: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository Hi Drew! Great idea, indeed, and I think it's kinda easy to do - I just need to have a look at Roller's source and grab its HTML editor components, and rework them to be WW2 components. Now, I just gotta find me some time to implement that :) []'s -cv -Mensagem original- De: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviada em: quinta-feira, 2 de outubro de 2003 13:58 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: RE: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository Here's another useful idea. How about a rich text editor component, to take the place of a textarea control? I've seen things like this on PHP message boards. It includes a formatting toolbar as well as the textarea itself, and works just like a miniature wordpad. I don't know how hard this would be to do as a component, but it would certainly be useful. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Francisco Hernandez Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository I need to look into the code but the date picker component works fine with IE, its just Mozilla thats crapping out with it Pat Lightbody wrote: Looks like a problem with the absolute/relative paths -- should be trivial to fix. - Original Message - From: Francisco Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:18 PM Subject: Re: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository im using the latest firdbird myself too, when i click on the arrows to goto the next/previous month/year I get this: 404 Not Found Resource /cart/templates/xhtml/calendar/templates/xhtml/calendar/calendar.html not found on this server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really?! I expected the other way around, as I developed/tested this using Mozilla Firebird 0.6! :) What does the _javascript_ console shows? -Mensagem original- De: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviada em: terça-feira, 30 de setembro de 2003 15:51 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: Re: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository uh oh, I tried it in Mozilla, and it fails, but works great in IE! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, the date picker is here: http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-329 Have fun, and if there are any suggestions, feel free to add them. Peace, -cv -Mensagem original- *De:* Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *Enviada em:* terça-feira, 30 de setembro de 2003 10:19 *Para:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Assunto:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository If people add them to Jira issues, we'll put them in CVS to go into the distribution... -Original Message- *From:* Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:01 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository Sure, JIRA is fine, or you can email me at drew (at) lowerunit dot com (trying to avoid getting more spam). I've been looking for one of these for a long time. It's especially helpful to have a ww component. Any idea on if a component repository will be created, and if so, where it will go on CVS? A great component repository would really help sell webwork to a lot of people, hitting a nice sweet spot between tapestry and struts. Thanks, Drew -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, September 29, 2003 5:30 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository Hi Drew! I just finished mine, and it's working quite well with european (dd/mm/) dates. Should be a breeze to modify them for the american/british format (mm/dd/). How should I send it to you? Maybe create an issue in JIRA and attach it? -cv -Mensagem original- *De:* Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *Enviada em:* sábado, 27 de setembro de 2003 14:51 *Para:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Assunto:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository If someone has a datepicker component available, I would love to get access to it right away. -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *On Behalf Of *Jason Carreira *Sent:* Friday, September 26, 2003 11:46 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository I think they should go right into WW2 CVS... Sounds like a great idea. -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *Sent:* Friday, September 26, 2003 10:47 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* [OS-webwork] Component repository Hi all, Do you think it would be a good idea to set up a component repository somewhere? I'm creating some components here, and I
Re: [OS-webwork] Accessing request parameters
#foo grabs from the ActionContext (OgnlContext is what it really is), so that won't work I recently added support for doing #reqeuest['foo'], (as well as session and application), but those are for _attributes_ not parameters. This is an easy fix though -- I just have to add another Map (parameter map). What's a good now? How about just params? -Pat - Original Message - From: Nils Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:17 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Accessing request parameters The request parameters are in the valuestack, so I believe the syntax to search the stack is #foo. It doesn't work for me. I call a jsp with http://myhost.com?foo=bla but ww:property value=#foo/ doesn't return the value. (Regardless whether the jsp is invoked directly or used as an action's result). The same in included pages. nils --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
[OS-webwork] List of products using WebWork
I've added a section on the WebWork page which lists products using WebWork http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork Feel free to add yours... Jason -- Jason Carreira Technical Architect, Notiva Corp. phone: 585.240.2793 fax: 585.272.8118 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] NPE thrown when view location returned is not found for an action
Did you create a Jira issue for this? -Original Message- From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 8:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OS-webwork] NPE thrown when view location returned is not found for an action im getting the NPE below thrown when a views location returned in not found i have the result defined but the file (a jsp) does not exist in the file system. just need a prettier error i guess.. 500 Internal Server Error java.lang.NullPointerException at com.opensymphony.webwork.dispatcher.ServletDispatcherResult.ex ecute(ServletDispatcherResult.java:67) at com.opensymphony.xwork.DefaultActionInvocation.executeResult(D efaultActionInvocation.java:235) at com.opensymphony.xwork.DefaultActionInvocation.invoke(DefaultA ctionInvocation.java:161) at com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.DefaultWorkflowInterceptor. intercept(DefaultWorkflowInterceptor.java:58) at com.opensymphony.xwork.DefaultActionInvocation.invoke(DefaultA ctionInvocation.java:149) at com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.AroundInterceptor.intercept (AroundInterceptor.java:37) at com.opensymphony.xwork.DefaultActionInvocation.invoke(DefaultA ctionInvocation.java:149) at com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.AroundInterceptor.intercept (AroundInterceptor.java:37) at com.opensymphony.xwork.DefaultActionInvocation.invoke(DefaultA ctionInvocation.java:149) at com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.AroundInterceptor.intercept (AroundInterceptor.java:37) at com.opensymphony.xwork.DefaultActionInvocation.invoke(DefaultA ctionInvocation.java:149) at com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.AroundInterceptor.intercept (AroundInterceptor.java:37) at com.opensymphony.xwork.DefaultActionInvocation.invoke(DefaultA ctionInvocation.java:149) at com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.TimerInterceptor.intercept( TimerInterceptor.java:66) at com.opensymphony.xwork.DefaultActionInvocation.invoke(DefaultA ctionInvocation.java:149) at com.opensymphony.xwork.DefaultActionProxy.execute(DefaultActio nProxy.java:121) at com.opensymphony.webwork.dispatcher.ServletDispatcher.service( ServletDispatcher.java:169) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:336) at com.evermind[Orion/2.0.2 (build 11157)]._hb.doFilter(.:59) at com.opensymphony.webwork.lifecycle.RequestLifecycleFilter.doFi lter(RequestLifecycleFilter.java:62) at com.evermind[Orion/2.0.2 (build 11157)]._cub._pod(.:387) at com.evermind[Orion/2.0.2 (build 11157)]._cub._bmc(.:177) at com.evermind[Orion/2.0.2 (build 11157)]._ax._ltc(.:666) at com.evermind[Orion/2.0.2 (build 11157)]._ax._uab(.:191) at com.evermind[Orion/2.0.2 (build 11157)]._bf.run(.:62) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Testing actions
See below...
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 11:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Testing actions
Hi,
I'm building a test case with JUnit, I'm trying to use the
hole WW/XW engine ...
while trying to put an object into the session map I'm
getting a NPE ... At my action the code:
ActionContext.getContext().put(
ActionContext.SESSION,
ActionContext.getContext().
getSession().put(Static.USER_SESSION_KEY, user) );
Try getting the Session first, then setting something into it... Why are you trying to
set something into the ActionContext to replace the Session?
ActionContext context = ActionContext.getContext();
Map session = context.getSession();
session.put(Static.USER_SESSION_KEY, user);
The setUp method from the test case:
protected void setUp() throws Exception {
super.setUp();
Static.setEnvironment();
XmlConfigurationProvider configurationProvider =
new XmlConfigurationProvider( xwork.xml);
ConfigurationManager.clearConfigurationProviders();
ConfigurationManager.addConfigurationProvider(configurationProvider);
ConfigurationManager.getConfiguration().reload();
proxy =
ActionProxyFactory.getFactory().createActionProxy(,login,null);
userLogin = (UserLogin) proxy.getAction();
}
One test method:
public void testInvalidLogin() throws Exception {
proxy.setExecuteResult(false);
userLogin.setCelulaTecnica(new Integer(1));
userLogin.setPassword(0);
assertEquals(Action.ERROR,proxy.execute());
assertTrue(userLogin.hasErrors());
}
How can I achive this?
thanks
+ Samuel G. Mota
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ 55 (11) 4417 7093
+ Business Application Dpt.
+ Netset Serviços em Tecnologia
+ a Hypercom Company
+ http://www.hypercom.com
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] List of products using WebWork
Jason I'd be very interested in a list of sites SPECIFICALLY using Webwork 2 when they come on-line. Scott Smith Technical Specialist II TSG HLIS E-Commerce Solution Delivery Washington Mutual Bank 17901 Von Karman, 5th floor 7124MICA Irvine, CA 92614 Office: 949-838-1418 Cell: 949-413-6485 -Original Message- From: Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OS-webwork] List of products using WebWork I've added a section on the WebWork page which lists products using WebWork http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork Feel free to add yours... Jason -- Jason Carreira Technical Architect, Notiva Corp. phone: 585.240.2793 fax: 585.272.8118 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Accessing request parameters
I recently added support for doing #reqeuest['foo'], (as well as session and application), but those are for _attributes_ not parameters. This is an easy fix though -- I just have to add another Map (parameter map). What's a good now? How about just params? Who cares about names, it's the result that counts ;-) For me params is ok. Would be great If you add this feature. Thanks a lot, Nils --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Escaping
Pat Lightbody wrote: There are a few open issues with regards to escaping -- none of which all agree how it should be handled. Some want UI tags to escape, some want them not to. Some want the URL tag to escape, others don't. I am leaning towards this: * UI tags, property, iterate, text, etc should all _escape_ by default * URL tag should NOT escape by default * All tags should have an escape attribute (true/false) * Possibly have global params in webwork.properties to override the two defaults (UI URL) What do you guys think? -Pat I think there is some mistake here. The property tag AND the iterate tags can't escape. That will create the following issue: ww:iterate value=foo this is escaped ww:property value=thisPropertyIsEscapedTwice/ /ww:iterate etcetc. It seems that either you haven't thought this through or you put it strangely. +1 on all tags having escape attribute though. I do think that it might be an issue that there's really two kinds of escaping: escaping the body of the tag and escaping the text the tag prints. This is rather confusing, and unwanted. Anders Hovmöller --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] List of products using WebWork
Jason Carreira wrote: I've added a section on the WebWork page which lists products using WebWork http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork Feel free to add yours... I added Jive Forums to the list. Regards, Bruce Ritchie smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[OS-webwork] Localized text messages - with parameters?
Is there some way to get the localized text messages receiving parameters to replace? Shoud be nice to have a message like this: myMsg=Your (?) last login was on ? And them call: List params = new ArrayList(2); params.add(username); params.add(logindate); addActionError(myMsg,params) + Samuel G. Mota + [EMAIL PROTECTED] + 55 (11) 4417 7093 + Business Application Dpt. + Netset Serviços em Tecnologia + a Hypercom Company + http://www.hypercom.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] WW2 Tags vs. WW1.x Tags
Title: Message The major changes are: 1) the ww:property tag does not do 3 things anymore :-) We now have a ww:push tag as well as the ww:property tag 2) a few of the tags haven't been ported over or completely finished up -Original Message-From: Thompson, Kris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:11 PMTo: Opensymphony-Webwork (E-mail)Subject: [OS-webwork] WW2 Tags vs. WW1.x Tags In general can one state that most if not all of the WW1.x tags work in WW2 or has there been a major overhaul? Thanks Kris Thompson
RE: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository
There's also this: http://displaytag.sourceforge.net/ Which is very cool... Mathias Bogaert is on the project team (and works with WebWork)... This would be cool to use with WW2 and be able to use Ognl, if possible... -Original Message- From: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository Here's another useful idea. How about a rich text editor component, to take the place of a textarea control? I've seen things like this on PHP message boards. It includes a formatting toolbar as well as the textarea itself, and works just like a miniature wordpad. I don't know how hard this would be to do as a component, but it would certainly be useful. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francisco Hernandez Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository I need to look into the code but the date picker component works fine with IE, its just Mozilla thats crapping out with it Pat Lightbody wrote: Looks like a problem with the absolute/relative paths -- should be trivial to fix. - Original Message - From: Francisco Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:18 PM Subject: Re: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository im using the latest firdbird myself too, when i click on the arrows to goto the next/previous month/year I get this: 404 Not Found Resource /cart/templates/xhtml/calendar/templates/xhtml/calendar/cale ndar.html not found on this server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really?! I expected the other way around, as I developed/tested this using Mozilla Firebird 0.6! :) What does the JavaScript console shows? -Mensagem original- De: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: terça-feira, 30 de setembro de 2003 15:51 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: Re: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository uh oh, I tried it in Mozilla, and it fails, but works great in IE! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, the date picker is here: http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-329 Have fun, and if there are any suggestions, feel free to add them. Peace, -cv -Mensagem original- *De:* Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Enviada em:* terça-feira, 30 de setembro de 2003 10:19 *Para:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Assunto:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository If people add them to Jira issues, we'll put them in CVS to go into the distribution... -Original Message- *From:* Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:01 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository Sure, JIRA is fine, or you can email me at drew (at) lowerunit dot com (trying to avoid getting more spam). I've been looking for one of these for a long time. It's especially helpful to have a ww component. Any idea on if a component repository will be created, and if so, where it will go on CVS? A great component repository would really help sell webwork to a lot of people, hitting a nice sweet spot between tapestry and struts. Thanks, Drew -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, September 29, 2003 5:30 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository Hi Drew! I just finished mine, and it's working quite well with european (dd/mm/) dates. Should be a breeze to modify them for the american/british format (mm/dd/). How should I send it to you? Maybe create an issue in JIRA and attach it? -cv -Mensagem original- *De:* Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Enviada em:* sábado, 27 de setembro de 2003 14:51 *Para:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Assunto:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository If someone has a datepicker component available, I would love to get access to it right away. -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Jason Carreira *Sent:* Friday, September 26, 2003 11:46 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository I think they should go right into WW2 CVS... Sounds like a
RE: [OS-webwork] Localized text messages - with parameters?
Check out: com.opensymphony.xwork.util.LocalizedTextUtil#findText(Class aClass, String aTextName, Locale locale, String defaultMessage, Object[] args) You can use this to get a parameterized message and then add that... If you think we need another method or two on the ValidationAware Interface, then create a Jira issue... Jason -Original Message- From: Samuel Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 2:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OS-webwork] Localized text messages - with parameters? Is there some way to get the localized text messages receiving parameters to replace? Shoud be nice to have a message like this: myMsg=Your (?) last login was on ? And them call: List params = new ArrayList(2); params.add(username); params.add(logindate); addActionError(myMsg,params) + Samuel G. Mota + [EMAIL PROTECTED] + 55 (11) 4417 7093 + Business Application Dpt. + Netset Serviços em Tecnologia + a Hypercom Company + http://www.hypercom.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] List of products using WebWork
Jason Carreira wrote: I've added a section on the WebWork page which lists products using WebWork http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork Feel free to add yours... I've added our CMS/portal/doc mgmt tool SiteVision to the list. /Rickard --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Escaping
That was a typo -- I'd only escape things that didn't have bodies to avoid that very confusion. What say you? - Original Message - From: boxed [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:54 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Escaping Pat Lightbody wrote: There are a few open issues with regards to escaping -- none of which all agree how it should be handled. Some want UI tags to escape, some want them not to. Some want the URL tag to escape, others don't. I am leaning towards this: * UI tags, property, iterate, text, etc should all _escape_ by default * URL tag should NOT escape by default * All tags should have an escape attribute (true/false) * Possibly have global params in webwork.properties to override the two defaults (UI URL) What do you guys think? -Pat I think there is some mistake here. The property tag AND the iterate tags can't escape. That will create the following issue: ww:iterate value=foo this is escaped ww:property value=thisPropertyIsEscapedTwice/ /ww:iterate etcetc. It seems that either you haven't thought this through or you put it strangely. +1 on all tags having escape attribute though. I do think that it might be an issue that there's really two kinds of escaping: escaping the body of the tag and escaping the text the tag prints. This is rather confusing, and unwanted. Anders Hovmöller --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Localized text messages - with parameters?
+1 on this. I think there's something like this working for messages coming from the validation framework, but I'd definitely like to see it work with normal error messages. Should be pretty simple, using java.text stuff (though I don't know how it impacts performance). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Samuel Mota Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 11:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OS-webwork] Localized text messages - with parameters? Is there some way to get the localized text messages receiving parameters to replace? Shoud be nice to have a message like this: myMsg=Your (?) last login was on ? And them call: List params = new ArrayList(2); params.add(username); params.add(logindate); addActionError(myMsg,params) + Samuel G. Mota + [EMAIL PROTECTED] + 55 (11) 4417 7093 + Business Application Dpt. + Netset Serviços em Tecnologia + a Hypercom Company + http://www.hypercom.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository
Title: Message Excellent, I already have something I can use this for. Also, what about some sort of tree component? I have part of an application that I'd like to display using a tree view but haven't had time to investigate it further. Does anyone else have any experience with something like this? I noticed that InfoGlue (on the projects using webwork page) has some kind of tree view, and it looks like it can switch between an applet and html tree view. That would be killer as a ww component. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:26 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RES: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository Hi Drew! Great idea, indeed, and I think it's kinda easy to do - I just need to have a look at Roller's source and grab its HTML editor components, and rework them to be WW2 components. Now, I just gotta find me some time to implement that :) []'s -cv -Mensagem original- De: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviada em: quinta-feira, 2 de outubro de 2003 13:58 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: RE: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository Here's another useful idea. How about a rich text editor component, to take the place of a textarea control? I've seen things like this on PHP message boards. It includes a formatting toolbar as well as the textarea itself, and works just like a miniature wordpad. I don't know how hard this would be to do as a component, but it would certainly be useful. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Francisco Hernandez Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository I need to look into the code but the date picker component works fine with IE, its just Mozilla thats crapping out with it Pat Lightbody wrote: Looks like a problem with the absolute/relative paths -- should be trivial to fix. - Original Message - From: "Francisco Hernandez" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:18 PM Subject: Re: RES: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository im using the latest firdbird myself too, when i click on the arrows to goto the next/previous month/year I get this: 404 Not Found Resource /cart/templates/xhtml/calendar/templates/xhtml/calendar/calendar.html not found on this server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really?! I expected the other way around, as I developed/tested this using Mozilla Firebird 0.6! :) What does the _javascript_ console shows? -Mensagem original- De: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviada em: terça-feira, 30 de setembro de 2003 15:51 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: Re: RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository uh oh, I tried it in Mozilla, and it fails, but works great in IE! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, the date picker is here: http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-329 Have fun, and if there are any suggestions, feel free to add them. Peace, -cv -Mensagem original- *De:* Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *Enviada em:* terça-feira, 30 de setembro de 2003 10:19 *Para:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Assunto:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository If people add them to Jira issues, we'll put them in CVS to go into the distribution... -Original Message- *From:* Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:01 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository Sure, JIRA is fine, or you can email me at drew (at) lowerunit dotcom (trying to avoid getting more spam). I've been looking for oneof these for a long time. It's especially helpful to have a ww component. Any idea on if a component repository will be created, and if so, where it will go on CVS? A great component repository would really help sell webwork to a lot of people, hitting a nice sweet spot between tapestry and struts. Thanks, Drew -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, September 29, 2003 5:30 AM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* RES: [OS-webwork] Component repository Hi Drew! I just finished mine, and it's working quite well with european (dd/mm/) dates. Should be a breeze to modify them for the american/british format (mm/dd/). How should I send it to you? Maybe create an issue in JIRA and attach it? -cv -Mensagem
RE: [OS-webwork] Localized text messages - with parameters?
If you use getText() from LocaleAware (and you extend ActionSupport or use LocaleAwareSupport) then it will use LocalizedTextUtil which does the parsing of the variables in the String... -Original Message- From: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 2:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Localized text messages - with parameters? +1 on this. I think there's something like this working for messages coming from the validation framework, but I'd definitely like to see it work with normal error messages. Should be pretty simple, using java.text stuff (though I don't know how it impacts performance). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Samuel Mota Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 11:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OS-webwork] Localized text messages - with parameters? Is there some way to get the localized text messages receiving parameters to replace? Shoud be nice to have a message like this: myMsg=Your (?) last login was on ? And them call: List params = new ArrayList(2); params.add(username); params.add(logindate); addActionError(myMsg,params) + Samuel G. Mota + [EMAIL PROTECTED] + 55 (11) 4417 7093 + Business Application Dpt. + Netset Serviços em Tecnologia + a Hypercom Company + http://www.hypercom.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
[OS-webwork] Same property, 3 textfields
Title: Same property, 3 textfields
Hi everyone! :)
I've got a form like this:
E-mail: [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Type: [Personal ][v]
E-mail: [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Type: [Business ][v]
E-mail: [ ] Type: [Other ][v]
, an Email object:
public class Email {
private String address;
private int type;
// getters and setters
}
, and a List of Email objects in my Action:
public class AddEmailsAction extends ActionSupport {
private List emails = new ArrayList();
// getters and setters
}
How can I make WW2 add a new Email object for each row filled in the form? Is it even possible? :)
Peace,
-cv
RE: [OS-webwork] Same property, 3 textfields
Title: Message
Hmm...
what is that syntax for indexed properties... try field names email(1).address
and email(1).type, etc...
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:24 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [OS-webwork]
Same property, 3 textfields
Hi everyone! :)
I've got a form like this:
E-mail: [
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Type:
[Personal ][v] E-mail: [
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Type:
[Business ][v] E-mail:
[
] Type: [Other ][v]
, an Email object:
public class Email { private
String address; private int type;
// getters and setters }
, and a List of Email objects in my Action:
public class AddEmailsAction extends ActionSupport {
private List emails = new ArrayList();
// getters and setters }
How can I make WW2 add a new Email object for each row filled
in the form? Is it even possible? :)
Peace, -cv
RE: [OS-webwork] Same property, 3 textfields
Title: Message
Hmm...I think you'll need to pre-populate your List with empty objects...
then it might work.
Or,
you could have a method, like:
getEmail(int index)
and
setEmail(int index, Email email)
and
use that to create a new one for an index out of bounds
Not
sure...
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:52 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RES:
[OS-webwork] Same property, 3 textfields
Hi Jason!
I tried this:
#bodytag(Form "action="" "method=post")
#tag(TextField "label='E-mail'"
"name=emails[0].address") #tag(TextField
"label='E-mail'" "name=emails[1].address") #tag(TextField "label='E-mail'" "name=emails[2].address")
#tag(Submit "value='Continue'"); #end
And it rightly throws an IndexOutOfBounds excecption trying to
call AddEmailsAction.getEmails().get(0), .get(1), and get(2) even before
letting me set the fields. So, I'm pretty sure this implementation won't work
well, but I'm out of ideas... do you have any? I'm free to implement anything
that might be needed, my only requirements are to have a List of Email objects
when the action finishes execute().
Again, thanks for the help! :)
-cv
-Mensagem original- De: Jason
Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 2 de outubro de 2003 16:27
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: RE: [OS-webwork] Same property, 3 textfields
Hmm... what is that syntax for indexed properties... try field
names email(1).address and email(1).type, etc... -Original Message- From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Same property, 3 textfields
Hi everyone! :) I've got a form like
this: E-mail: [
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Type:
[Personal ][v] E-mail: [
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Type:
[Business ][v] E-mail:
[
] Type: [Other ][v] , an Email
object: public class Email { private String address; private
int type; // getters and setters
} , and a List of Email
objects in my Action: public class AddEmailsAction
extends ActionSupport { private List emails =
new ArrayList(); // getters and setters
} How can I make WW2 add a new
Email object for each row filled in the form? Is it even possible? :)
Peace, -cv
Re: [OS-webwork] List of products using WebWork
Jason Carreira wrote: I've added a section on the WebWork page which lists products using WebWork http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork Feel free to add yours... Jason Added SK Forum. Anders Hovmöller --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Checkbox grouping?
I would have the checkbox list as one name, then the textfield as a different name, then check whtere Other was selected in the checkboxes and if it was just the value from the textfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I gotta create a form like this: [ ] Foo [ ] Bar [ ] Baz [ ] Other: [ ] Being kind of a WW2 newbie, what would be the best way to do that? It'd be better if I could keep the other text filled in the textbox in the same place on the model (and thus, the model has a String property). Any ideas gladly appreciated! :) []'s -cv --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Another quickie
Title: Another quickie
I don't think you can use the tag that way. The
listKey param specifies the name of the property of the objects in the list
specified by the list param... see the webwork/docs/tag-doc.htm
For some reason that document is not on wiki, at
least I have not found it.
Jonas
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 6:42
PM
Subject: [OS-webwork] Another
quickie
Hi all :)
First, thanks a lot to Jason for answering the
previous question (checkbox grouping) so fast. Really helpful! :)
Now I'm creating one more component, a select box
for gender, which should render something like this:
Gender: [Choose
one... ][v]
In my Velocity template, I tried:
#tag(Select "label=gender" "name=gender"
"value=gender" "listKey={' ', 'M', 'F'}" "listValue={'Choose
one...', 'Male,
'Female'}" )
But, so far, no-no. I'm almost certain
there's something wrong with the OGNL expressions, but reading the OGNL user's
guide I couldn't find any evidence proving it. Any ideas? :)
[]'s -cv
Re: [OS-webwork] WW2 Tags vs. WW1.x Tags
Jason Carreira wrote: The major changes are: 1) the ww:property tag does not do 3 things anymore :-) We now have a ww:push tag as well as the ww:property tag Don't scare me here.. please tell me the property tag only does one thing and that there's a tag for that elusive third use! Anders Hovmöller --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: RES: [OS-webwork] Same property, 3 textfields
how about iterating through the collection instead of calling the indexes
ww:iterator value=emails
ww:textfield label='E-Mail' name=address
/ww:iterator
just convert that to velocity :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jason!
I tried this:
#bodytag(Form action=emails.action method=post)
#tag(TextField label='E-mail' name=emails[0].address)
#tag(TextField label='E-mail' name=emails[1].address)
#tag(TextField label='E-mail' name=emails[2].address)
#tag(Submit value='Continue');
#end
And it rightly throws an IndexOutOfBounds excecption trying to call
AddEmailsAction.getEmails().get(0), .get(1), and get(2) even before
letting me set the fields. So, I'm pretty sure this implementation won't
work well, but I'm out of ideas... do you have any? I'm free to
implement anything that might be needed, my only requirements are to
have a List of Email objects when the action finishes execute().
Again, thanks for the help! :)
-cv
-Mensagem original-
De: Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 2 de outubro de 2003 16:27
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: RE: [OS-webwork] Same property, 3 textfields
Hmm... what is that syntax for indexed properties... try field names
email(1).address and email(1).type, etc...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Same property, 3 textfields
Hi everyone! :)
I've got a form like this:
E-mail: [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Type: [Personal ][v]
E-mail: [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Type: [Business ][v]
E-mail: [ ] Type: [Other ][v]
, an Email object:
public class Email {
private String address;
private int type;
// getters and setters
}
, and a List of Email objects in my Action:
public class AddEmailsAction extends ActionSupport {
private List emails = new ArrayList();
// getters and setters
}
How can I make WW2 add a new Email object for each row filled in the
form? Is it even possible? :)
Peace,
-cv
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Accessing request parameters
how about 'parameters' Pat Lightbody wrote: #foo grabs from the ActionContext (OgnlContext is what it really is), so that won't work I recently added support for doing #reqeuest['foo'], (as well as session and application), but those are for _attributes_ not parameters. This is an easy fix though -- I just have to add another Map (parameter map). What's a good now? How about just params? -Pat - Original Message - From: Nils Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:17 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Accessing request parameters The request parameters are in the valuestack, so I believe the syntax to search the stack is #foo. It doesn't work for me. I call a jsp with http://myhost.com?foo=bla but ww:property value=#foo/ doesn't return the value. (Regardless whether the jsp is invoked directly or used as an action's result). The same in included pages. nils --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] WW2 Tags vs. WW1.x Tags
Yes, it only does one thing... I couldn't remember what the third thing the old property tag used to do was... :-) -Original Message- From: boxed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 4:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WW2 Tags vs. WW1.x Tags Jason Carreira wrote: The major changes are: 1) the ww:property tag does not do 3 things anymore :-) We now have a ww:push tag as well as the ww:property tag Don't scare me here.. please tell me the property tag only does one thing and that there's a tag for that elusive third use! Anders Hovmöller --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Value Stack Magic
Hello, What Adam probably means is that he wants the class instance, instead of some field value. I have been puzzling at this too. Suppose you are iterating over a List and you want to pass the _whole_ top stack object to an action (maybe inside an URL), how do you do that? What I have found thus far is that Ognl 'translates' everything to a string (or String[]???). It would be nice to know if there is a way to cast, or specify the class of the object you want to pass to the action. Something like: a href=ww:url value=editoption.actionww:param name=entry value=(EntryClass) that //ww:urledit3/a Where 'that' is the object at the top of the stack (aka [0] aka that ;-) ). Is something like this possible? How does Ognl handle type casting? If it doesn't how do others handle data objects (Beans)? greets, Hendrik On donderdag, okt 2, 2003, at 00:53 Europe/Amsterdam, Matt Ho wrote: If you're trying to toString() [EMAIL PROTECTED], then call ww:property value=[1].toString()/ A value stack is essentially a List. Calling [1] on the stack, returns a substack beginning with the element at index 1. It's only when you call methods on the stack that your actual objects will be called. Said another way, let's say I have a value stack that consists of a model and an action as follows: [ model, action ] here's how the following ognl would resolve: [0] - a CompoundRoot object that contains our stack, [model, action] [1] - another CompoundRoot that contains only [action] [0].toString() - calls toString() on the first object in the value stack (excluding the CompoundRoot) that supports the toString() method [1].foo - call getFoo() on the first object in the value stack starting from [action] and excluding the CompoundRoot that supports a getFoo() method I hope this doesn't sound too confusing :\ If you're using Velocity, this can most easily be written as: $stack.findValue([0]).peek() Unfortunately, ww:property value=[0].peek()/ won't work as this would translate into starting at the top of the value stack (and excluding the CompoundRoot), find the first object that has a method called peek() Cheers! M Adam Fleming wrote: I'm trying to get something on the Value Stack from withing a ww:iterator tag, i use this: ww:property value=[1] and get something like: [ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] What is the OGNL to get theClassIwant? I'm not looking for some property of the class, but the class itself. thanks! --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Value Stack Magic
Yup... that does the trick. - Original Message - From: Hendrik van der Linde [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 4:28 PM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Value Stack Magic Hello, What Adam probably means is that he wants the class instance, instead of some field value. I have been puzzling at this too. Suppose you are iterating over a List and you want to pass the _whole_ top stack object to an action (maybe inside an URL), how do you do that? What I have found thus far is that Ognl 'translates' everything to a string (or String[]???). It would be nice to know if there is a way to cast, or specify the class of the object you want to pass to the action. Something like: a href=ww:url value=editoption.actionww:param name=entry value=(EntryClass) that //ww:urledit3/a Where 'that' is the object at the top of the stack (aka [0] aka that ;-) ). Is something like this possible? How does Ognl handle type casting? If it doesn't how do others handle data objects (Beans)? greets, Hendrik On donderdag, okt 2, 2003, at 00:53 Europe/Amsterdam, Matt Ho wrote: If you're trying to toString() [EMAIL PROTECTED], then call ww:property value=[1].toString()/ A value stack is essentially a List. Calling [1] on the stack, returns a substack beginning with the element at index 1. It's only when you call methods on the stack that your actual objects will be called. Said another way, let's say I have a value stack that consists of a model and an action as follows: [ model, action ] here's how the following ognl would resolve: [0] - a CompoundRoot object that contains our stack, [model, action] [1] - another CompoundRoot that contains only [action] [0].toString() - calls toString() on the first object in the value stack (excluding the CompoundRoot) that supports the toString() method [1].foo - call getFoo() on the first object in the value stack starting from [action] and excluding the CompoundRoot that supports a getFoo() method I hope this doesn't sound too confusing :\ If you're using Velocity, this can most easily be written as: $stack.findValue([0]).peek() Unfortunately, ww:property value=[0].peek()/ won't work as this would translate into starting at the top of the value stack (and excluding the CompoundRoot), find the first object that has a method called peek() Cheers! M Adam Fleming wrote: I'm trying to get something on the Value Stack from withing a ww:iterator tag, i use this: ww:property value=[1] and get something like: [ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] What is the OGNL to get theClassIwant? I'm not looking for some property of the class, but the class itself. thanks! --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Accessing request parameters
Done in CVS. - Original Message - From: Francisco Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:39 PM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Accessing request parameters how about 'parameters' Pat Lightbody wrote: #foo grabs from the ActionContext (OgnlContext is what it really is), so that won't work I recently added support for doing #reqeuest['foo'], (as well as session and application), but those are for _attributes_ not parameters. This is an easy fix though -- I just have to add another Map (parameter map). What's a good now? How about just params? -Pat - Original Message - From: Nils Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:17 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Accessing request parameters The request parameters are in the valuestack, so I believe the syntax to search the stack is #foo. It doesn't work for me. I call a jsp with http://myhost.com?foo=bla but ww:property value=#foo/ doesn't return the value. (Regardless whether the jsp is invoked directly or used as an action's result). The same in included pages. nils --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Can I just say that all of this advanced cool URL mapping shouldn't be in
WebWork core? It's an extension or addition, that should be shipped
separately?
(Or more likely just written up in a Wiki document for those who want to use
it?)
M
On 3/10/03 12:22 AM, Cameron Braid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the
words:
I have used cocoon before and they provide a cool url mapping techinque
using matchers.
I will have a think about how we can integrate something like that.
For example,
Syntax aside, I would like to be able to specify a match pattern of :
/action/year/month/day
to parse /article/2003/10/02
and get a map {action=article,year=2003,month=10,day=02}
Since we are trying to achive a permalink style URL, why are the
parameter names required in the URL ?
Also, for your original idea
/article/id/10 would probably be better written as /article/10 with a
matcher /(action)/(id)
This type of pattern will also allow for action namespaces
/namespace/action/id
Then /customer/sale/10 - namespace=customer, action=sale, id=10
Then /admin/vendor/sale/10 - namespace=/admin/vendor, action=sale,
id=10
Before we implement these ideas, what other types of URL's do we want to
try and map ?
Cameron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jérôme BERNARD
Sent: Thursday, 2 October 2003 7:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Hi Cameron,
The more I think about the CoolURIServletDispatcher, the more
I think it is too much limited. For example I changed the
abbreviation syntax from:
http://myhost.com/article/paramValue1 to
http://myhost.com/article/articleID/paramValue1 instead of
http://myhost.com/article/article/paramValue1 .
Why?
Simply because most of the time your action are written that way:
public class LoadArticleAction extends ActionSupport {
long articleID;
Article article;
// getter setter for the above members
// other methods omitted...
}
If you use a parameter named article (by using the same
parameter name as the one from the action) then you will need
to use weird method names in order to retreive the real
object linked to this id.
Anyway, I think we should write a custom ServletDispatcher
that reads advanced mapping configuration from another xml
file (or perhaps extends webwork.xml?).
This file could allow to use the sheme explained above but
also deal with URL including dates (like
http://myhost.com/2003/10/02).
What do you think about this?
Jérôme.
Selon Cameron Braid [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have madea patch to the servlet dispatcher to allow for
extensability
:
the methods that can be overriden are
protected void sendError(HttpServletRequest request,
HttpServletResponse response, int code, Exception e) protected Map
getParameterMap(HttpServletRequest request) protected Map
getSessionMap(HttpServletRequest request) protected Map
getApplicationMap() protected String
getActionName(HttpServletRequest
request) protected String getNameSpace(HttpServletRequest request)
this will allow for the core logic in the service method to
be re-used
from custom servlet based dispatchers, allowing a custom URL and
parameter mapping scheme to be implemented.
Pat / Jason / Others : do we want to include the
CoolUriServletDispatcher in the core ?
If so, I will modify it to extend the new ServletDispatcher.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerome BERNARD
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 4:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Hum... I should have a closer look at IDEA then :-)
Jérôme.
Cameron Braid wrote:
What IDE do you use ?
Eclispe can automatically create delegator calls for you,
which makes
tasks like that a piece of cake.
Cam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerome BERNARD
Sent: Monday, 29 September 2003 7:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Cameron Braid wrote:
Cool idea :)
Though, for the implementaion, wouldn't you have been better
to use the
wrapper pattern, rather than dynamic proxies :)
Sure. I thought about it, but it's quite painful: you have to
override so many methods :-(
I'll do it tomorrow and update the attachment in the JIRA issue.
Jérôme.
Cam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jérôme BERNARD
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 1:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
I have created a new issue in JIRA
(http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-326
) and submitted a new servlet that extends
ServletDispatcher and
provides such a functionality. I
RE: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
I don't mind where it goes.
I can remove the CoolUriServletDispatcher if you want.
Should we setup a WebWork2-extensions project on java.net ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Cannon-Brookes
Sent: Friday, 3 October 2003 11:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Can I just say that all of this advanced cool URL mapping
shouldn't be in WebWork core? It's an extension or addition,
that should be shipped separately?
(Or more likely just written up in a Wiki document for those
who want to use
it?)
M
On 3/10/03 12:22 AM, Cameron Braid ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
penned the
words:
I have used cocoon before and they provide a cool url mapping
techinque using matchers.
I will have a think about how we can integrate something like that.
For example,
Syntax aside, I would like to be able to specify a match
pattern of :
/action/year/month/day
to parse /article/2003/10/02
and get a map {action=article,year=2003,month=10,day=02}
Since we are trying to achive a permalink style URL, why are the
parameter names required in the URL ?
Also, for your original idea
/article/id/10 would probably be better written as
/article/10 with a
matcher /(action)/(id)
This type of pattern will also allow for action namespaces
/namespace/action/id
Then /customer/sale/10 - namespace=customer, action=sale,
id=10 Then
/admin/vendor/sale/10 - namespace=/admin/vendor, action=sale, id=10
Before we implement these ideas, what other types of URL's
do we want
to try and map ?
Cameron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
Of Jérôme BERNARD
Sent: Thursday, 2 October 2003 7:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Hi Cameron,
The more I think about the CoolURIServletDispatcher, the
more I think
it is too much limited. For example I changed the
abbreviation syntax
from: http://myhost.com/article/paramValue1 to
http://myhost.com/article/articleID/paramValue1 instead of
http://myhost.com/article/article/paramValue1 .
Why?
Simply because most of the time your action are written that way:
public class LoadArticleAction extends ActionSupport {
long articleID;
Article article;
// getter setter for the above members
// other methods omitted...
}
If you use a parameter named article (by using the same
parameter
name as the one from the action) then you will need to use weird
method names in order to retreive the real object linked
to this id.
Anyway, I think we should write a custom ServletDispatcher
that reads
advanced mapping configuration from another xml file (or perhaps
extends webwork.xml?).
This file could allow to use the sheme explained above but
also deal
with URL including dates (like http://myhost.com/2003/10/02).
What do you think about this?
Jérôme.
Selon Cameron Braid [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have madea patch to the servlet dispatcher to allow for
extensability
:
the methods that can be overriden are
protected void sendError(HttpServletRequest request,
HttpServletResponse response, int code, Exception e)
protected Map
getParameterMap(HttpServletRequest request) protected Map
getSessionMap(HttpServletRequest request) protected Map
getApplicationMap() protected String
getActionName(HttpServletRequest
request) protected String getNameSpace(HttpServletRequest request)
this will allow for the core logic in the service method to
be re-used
from custom servlet based dispatchers, allowing a custom URL and
parameter mapping scheme to be implemented.
Pat / Jason / Others : do we want to include the
CoolUriServletDispatcher in the core ?
If so, I will modify it to extend the new ServletDispatcher.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jerome BERNARD
Sent: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 4:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Hum... I should have a closer look at IDEA then :-) Jérôme.
Cameron Braid wrote:
What IDE do you use ?
Eclispe can automatically create delegator calls for you,
which makes
tasks like that a piece of cake.
Cam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerome BERNARD
Sent: Monday, 29 September 2003 7:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Advanced URL mapping?
Cameron Braid wrote:
Cool idea :)
Though, for the implementaion, wouldn't you have been better
to use the
wrapper pattern, rather than dynamic proxies :)
Sure. I thought about it, but it's
RE: [OS-webwork] Value Stack Magic
Suppose you are iterating over a List and you want to pass the _whole_ top stack object to an action (maybe inside an URL), how do you do that? a href=ww:url value=editoption.actionww:param name=entry value=(EntryClass) that //ww:urledit3/a I may be completely wrong, but I think you have to start by imagining what this should look like in the final HTML: a href=editoption.action?entry=ognl_paramvalue_hereedit3/a I suspect it isn't a feature of ognl that ww:params inside ww:urls are strings, but rather the logic of WebWork. This is still a GET request, after all, which doesn't support passing persisted objects unless you create your own hack. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
