Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss][C-RAN] The discussion for the detailed work plan

[renrong...@chinamobile.com]

Dear all,

Thank for all your response. For the meeting time, I make a survey to collect 
our suggestion. The link as below,
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/FZLPYHH 
We can make a decision for our meeting. Thank you so much.

Best wishes,
Ren Rongwei


renrong...@chinamobile.com
 
From: Ulas Kozat
Date: 2018-07-03 21:56
To: Azhar Sayeed; renrong...@chinamobile.com
CC: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Vaananen; pvaan...@redhat.com; 
tapio.tallg...@nokia.com; xiaohua.zhang; baoqian.li; niweic...@chinamobile.com; 
wangyaoguang (A)
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss][C-RAN] The discussion for the detailed work 
plan
I prefer Tuesday slot. I will not be able to join next week as I am on vacation.

Regards,

Ulas

From: Azhar Sayeed 
Date: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 6:49 AM
To: "renrong...@chinamobile.com" 
Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" , 
Vaananen , "pvaan...@redhat.com" 
, "tapio.tallg...@nokia.com" , 
"xiaohua.zhang" , Ulas Kozat 
, "baoqian.li" , 
"niweic...@chinamobile.com" , "wangyaoguang (A)" 

Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss][C-RAN] The discussion for the detailed work 
plan

Hello Ren Rongwei, 

Thank you for restarting this work.. I had heard that Bai Changming had left .. 
You should also join the OPNFV demo planing calls organized by Brandon 
Wick..This week many people are off due to US holiday. However if you have 
other participants please go ahead.. Either of these times work for me next 
week onwards

Regards,
Azhar

On Jul 2, 2018, at 10:41 PM, renrong...@chinamobile.com wrote:

Dear all，
  After our last discussion, 3 months has passed. I am so sorry for long time 
no news. We may choose one time slot to discuss the work plan.
   I list these choice:
   Tuesday UTC 13:00-14:00
   Wednesday UTC 3:00-4:00
  Looking forward for your reply.  I will make a draft this week. If everything 
is ok, we can meet next week.
Best wishes,
Ren Rongwei



renrong...@chinamobile.com



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#21519): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21519
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23008905/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] CANCELLED: VSPERF weekly meeting - 04 July 2018

[Sridhar K. N. Rao]

This week's meeting is cancelled. Happy Independence Day to all Americans!

Regards,
Sridhar






Spirent Communications e-mail confidentiality.

This e-mail contains confidential and / or privileged information belonging to 
Spirent Communications plc, its affiliates and / or subsidiaries. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution and / or the taking of any action based upon reliance on 
the contents of this transmission is strictly forbidden. If you have received 
this message in error please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete it 
from your system.

Spirent Communications plc
Northwood Park, Gatwick Road, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9XN, United Kingdom.
Tel No. +44 (0) 1293 767676
Fax No. +44 (0) 1293 767677

Registered in England Number 470893
Registered at Northwood Park, Gatwick Road, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9XN, 
United Kingdom.

Or if within the US,

Spirent Communications,
27349 Agoura Road, Calabasas, CA, 91301, USA.
Tel No. 1-818-676- 2300

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#21518): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21518
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23036251/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Yardstick][Storperf] support availability_zone and volume_type

[Mark Beierl]

Hello, Ameed.

Availability zone is already supported.  I have STORPERF-217 [1] open to be 
able to support volume metadata, which would allow for specifying the volume 
type.  I had started a patch for it [2], but ended up abandoning it.  Are you 
already an OPNFV contributor?  If so, I can assign this JIRA to you and I can 
help you get started.  If not, let's start the process of getting you set up as 
a contributor.

Or, if you are not actually wanting to write code, I can restart this and put 
it as the next highest priority item and get it in done over the next week.

[1] https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/STORPERF-217
[2] https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/44453

Regards,
Mark

Mark Beierl
SW System Sr Principal Developer
Dell EMC | Cloud & Communication Service Provider Solution
mark.bei...@dell.com

On Jul 3, 2018, at 06:55, Ameed Ashour 
mailto:ameed.ash...@exalt.ps>> wrote:

Hi

I am looking forward to supporting "availability_zone" and "volume_type" for 
storperf stack resources.

how can I start the contributions?

Best Regards
Ameed





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#21517): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21517
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23023699/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project

[Cedric OLLIVIER]

Hello Trevor,

I don't see the point about development.
As already explained during Release meetings and Weekly Technical
meetings (+mail Tue, 19 Jun 2018), Functest team wants to introduce
Functional Gating which is mandatory for our development.

We do stop linking the test frameworks gating and the installers one
(see the Releng model). It's also the first step towards a possible
rolling release 

We are fine to share it with other test projects as long as we don't
get false results (Workflow).

This topic is even more crucial at the beginning of the release because
of the Installer updates and then the lack of results even if MS3.1 is
reached.

Cédric

On lun., 2018-07-02 at 14:13 -0700, Trevor Bramwell wrote:
> Hi Alec,
> 
> Thanks for clarifying the use of POD 19. From what I know, most of
> the
> PODs at Intel are being used for development work.
> 
> Regards,
> Trevor Bramwell
> 
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +, Alec Hothan (ahothan)
> wrote:
> > please do not divert pod19, it is planned to be used for testing
> > projects. We can certainly share it with Auto when not in use.
> > The main requirement for pod19 is that we can rely on having a
> > stable bare metal installer/openstack on it so we can regress on
> > test projects – i.e. pod19 should not be used for testing
> > installers or for running installer CI jobs. I’m not sure what
> > “Auto CI” means exactly, if that relies on a stable openstack
> > running, it might work (assuming it does not trash openstack after
> > each run).
> > 
> > Have you looked at other Intel pods? I only know of 2 that are used
> > (12 and 19) and it seems there are more than 2 pods…
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> >   Alec
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > From:  on behalf of Trevor
> > Bramwell 
> > Date: Monday, July 2, 2018 at 8:40 AM
> > To: 
> > Cc: , ,  > oo...@intel.com>, 
> > Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project
> > 
> > Hi Intel and Huawei Lab Owners,
> > 
> > The Auto project is looking for an x86 POD for running CI jobs on
> > and
> > I'm reaching out to see if you have any available resources they
> > could
> > use.
> > 
> > I see Intel POD 19 may be available (now that plugtest is over),
> > and
> > Huawei POD 6 says it's IDLE. Could either of these or any other
> > PODs be
> > made available for Auto's CI jobs?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Trevor Bramwell
> > 
> > P.S. Trevor Cooper, I just remembered we discussed possibly using
> > POD 19
> > for test projects, though I don't recall if we reached a decision
> > on
> > that.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#21516): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21516
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23003662/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss][C-RAN] The discussion for the detailed work plan

[Ulas Kozat]

I prefer Tuesday slot. I will not be able to join next week as I am on vacation.

Regards,

Ulas

From: Azhar Sayeed mailto:asay...@redhat.com>>
Date: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 6:49 AM
To: "renrong...@chinamobile.com" 
mailto:renrong...@chinamobile.com>>
Cc: 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>,
 Vaananen mailto:opnfv.pasiv...@gmail.com>>, 
"pvaan...@redhat.com" 
mailto:pvaan...@redhat.com>>, 
"tapio.tallg...@nokia.com" 
mailto:tapio.tallg...@nokia.com>>, "xiaohua.zhang" 
mailto:xiaohua.zh...@windriver.com>>, Ulas Kozat 
mailto:ulas.ko...@huawei.com>>, "baoqian.li" 
mailto:baoqian...@intel.com>>, 
"niweic...@chinamobile.com" 
mailto:niweic...@chinamobile.com>>, "wangyaoguang 
(A)" mailto:sunshine.w...@huawei.com>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss][C-RAN] The discussion for the detailed work 
plan

Hello Ren Rongwei,

Thank you for restarting this work.. I had heard that Bai Changming had left .. 
You should also join the OPNFV demo planing calls organized by Brandon 
Wick..This week many people are off due to US holiday. However if you have 
other participants please go ahead.. Either of these times work for me next 
week onwards

Regards,
Azhar

On Jul 2, 2018, at 10:41 PM, 
renrong...@chinamobile.com wrote:

Dear all，
  After our last discussion, 3 months has passed. I am so sorry for long time 
no news. We may choose one time slot to discuss the work plan.
   I list these choice:
   Tuesday UTC 13:00-14:00
   Wednesday UTC 3:00-4:00
  Looking forward for your reply.  I will make a draft this week. If everything 
is ok, we can meet next week.
Best wishes,
Ren Rongwei


renrong...@chinamobile.com


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#21515): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21515
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23008905/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Yardstick][Storperf] support availability_zone and volume_type

[Ameed Ashour]

Hi

I am looking forward to supporting "availability_zone" and "volume_type"
for storperf stack resources.

how can I start the contributions?

Best Regards
Ameed

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#21514): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21514
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23023699/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[opnfv-tech-discuss][dovetail] Tomorrow's Dovetail meeting

[Georg Kunz]

Hi Dovetailers,

Due to Independence Day in the US, I don't expect any project members from the 
US to join tomorrow's Dovetail call. Because of this, I'll move the meeting to 
an earlier time to allow better participation from China.

The new meeting time is 9am UTC. Please let me know if that doesn't work for 
you or if this collides with another OPNFV meeting.

Preliminary agenda

  *   Test case status
  *   Documentation status
  *   Web portal status

Best regards
Georg

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#21513): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21513
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23022738/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project

[wutianwei]

Hi Cristina,

I will contact with joid team. If they don’t use huawei-pod12 anymore, Auto 
project can run on huawei-pod12

Thanks
Tianwei Wu


发件人: Cristina Pauna [mailto:cristina.pa...@enea.com]
发送时间: 2018年7月3日 16:31
收件人: Joe Kidder ; wutianwei 
抄送: Alec Hothan (ahothan) ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; timothy.gres...@intel.com; 
trevor.coo...@intel.com; tina.t...@arm.com; Trevor Bramwell 

主题: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project

What about intel-pod18 or huawei-pod12. They currently run Joid jobs, but with 
Fraser release done and development for Joid stopped, maybe one of these can be 
repurposed.

Cristina

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> 
On Behalf Of Joe Kidder
Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 5:05 AM
To: wutianw...@huawei.com
Cc: Alec Hothan (ahothan) mailto:ahot...@cisco.com>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; 
timothy.gres...@intel.com; 
trevor.coo...@intel.com; 
tina.t...@arm.com; Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project

Wutianwei,
  Would a Huawei x86 pod be available for use by the Auto project for CI 
purposes?

Thank you,
Joe Kidder
Auto Project

On Jul 2, 2018, at 5:13 PM, Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:

Hi Alec,

Thanks for clarifying the use of POD 19. From what I know, most of the
PODs at Intel are being used for development work.

Regards,
Trevor Bramwell

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote:
please do not divert pod19, it is planned to be used for testing projects. We 
can certainly share it with Auto when not in use.
The main requirement for pod19 is that we can rely on having a stable bare 
metal installer/openstack on it so we can regress on test projects – i.e. pod19 
should not be used for testing installers or for running installer CI jobs. I’m 
not sure what “Auto CI” means exactly, if that relies on a stable openstack 
running, it might work (assuming it does not trash openstack after each run).

Have you looked at other Intel pods? I only know of 2 that are used (12 and 19) 
and it seems there are more than 2 pods…

Thanks

 Alec



From: 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> 
on behalf of Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Date: Monday, July 2, 2018 at 8:40 AM
To: 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Cc: mailto:wutianw...@huawei.com>>, 
mailto:timothy.gres...@intel.com>>, 
mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>, 
mailto:tina.t...@arm.com>>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project

Hi Intel and Huawei Lab Owners,

The Auto project is looking for an x86 POD for running CI jobs on and
I'm reaching out to see if you have any available resources they could
use.

I see Intel POD 19 may be available (now that plugtest is over), and
Huawei POD 6 says it's IDLE. Could either of these or any other PODs be
made available for Auto's CI jobs?

Regards,
Trevor Bramwell

P.S. Trevor Cooper, I just remembered we discussed possibly using POD 19
for test projects, though I don't recall if we reached a decision on
that.






This message, including attachments, is CONFIDENTIAL. It may also be privileged 
or otherwise protected by law. If you received this email by mistake please let 
us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy it or 
disclose its contents to anyone. All messages sent to and from Enea may be 
monitored to ensure compliance with internal policies and to protect our 
business. Emails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as 
they can be intercepted, a mended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. The 
sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the 
contents of this message, which arise as a result of email transmission. Anyone 
who communicates with us by email accepts these risks.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#21512): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21512
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23022389/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project

[Cristina Pauna]

What about intel-pod18 or huawei-pod12. They currently run Joid jobs, but with 
Fraser release done and development for Joid stopped, maybe one of these can be 
repurposed.

Cristina

From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org  
On Behalf Of Joe Kidder
Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 5:05 AM
To: wutianw...@huawei.com
Cc: Alec Hothan (ahothan) ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; timothy.gres...@intel.com; 
trevor.coo...@intel.com; tina.t...@arm.com; Trevor Bramwell 

Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project

Wutianwei,
  Would a Huawei x86 pod be available for use by the Auto project for CI 
purposes?

Thank you,
Joe Kidder
Auto Project


On Jul 2, 2018, at 5:13 PM, Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:

Hi Alec,

Thanks for clarifying the use of POD 19. From what I know, most of the
PODs at Intel are being used for development work.

Regards,
Trevor Bramwell

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote:

please do not divert pod19, it is planned to be used for testing projects. We 
can certainly share it with Auto when not in use.
The main requirement for pod19 is that we can rely on having a stable bare 
metal installer/openstack on it so we can regress on test projects – i.e. pod19 
should not be used for testing installers or for running installer CI jobs. I’m 
not sure what “Auto CI” means exactly, if that relies on a stable openstack 
running, it might work (assuming it does not trash openstack after each run).

Have you looked at other Intel pods? I only know of 2 that are used (12 and 19) 
and it seems there are more than 2 pods…

Thanks

 Alec



From: 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> 
on behalf of Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Date: Monday, July 2, 2018 at 8:40 AM
To: 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Cc: mailto:wutianw...@huawei.com>>, 
mailto:timothy.gres...@intel.com>>, 
mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>, 
mailto:tina.t...@arm.com>>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] x86 POD for Auto Project

Hi Intel and Huawei Lab Owners,

The Auto project is looking for an x86 POD for running CI jobs on and
I'm reaching out to see if you have any available resources they could
use.

I see Intel POD 19 may be available (now that plugtest is over), and
Huawei POD 6 says it's IDLE. Could either of these or any other PODs be
made available for Auto's CI jobs?

Regards,
Trevor Bramwell

P.S. Trevor Cooper, I just remembered we discussed possibly using POD 19
for test projects, though I don't recall if we reached a decision on
that.








This message, including attachments, is CONFIDENTIAL. It may also be privileged 
or otherwise protected by law. If you received this email by mistake please let 
us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy it or 
disclose its contents to anyone. All messages sent to and from Enea may be 
monitored to ensure compliance with internal policies and to protect our 
business. Emails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as 
they can be intercepted, a mended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. The 
sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the 
contents of this message, which arise as a result of email transmission. Anyone 
who communicates with us by email accepts these risks.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#21511): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21511
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23003662/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[opnfv-tech-discuss][C-RAN] Call for PTL election

[bcm]

Hi  all,


This is Changming Bai. Due to the job transfer, I will not be the PTL of C-RAN 
project. We need to elect a new C-RAN PTL.
I would like to nominate Rongwei Ren, my colleague, for the new PTL that she 
has a clear understanding for the future work direction.


Voting period is open for one week. Project committers are allowed to vote.
Committers please respond with the name of the candidate for PTL you support. 
Thanks for  all your support.
Now I am in a new company but also focus on the edge cloud technical 
development. Looking forward for future cooperation. 
Best wishes.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#21510): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21510
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/23021807/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-