Re: Tor 0.2.2.18-alpha is out

2010-11-17 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:11:44 -0500
Justin Aplin jmap...@ufl.edu wrote:
 I agree that dropping the expert packages might be a good idea, but
 I don't see a reason that the Vidalia bundles should fall behind.

The reason for the delay in packages is the powerpc build machine died
a melting death when the internal fan died over a weekend.  A donor gave
us a powerpc mac mini for a build machine running 10.5.  It's in
process of being turned into the powerpc build machine.  Alternatively,
building from source is very easy once the dependencies are installed.

I'm not sure how well 10.5 binaries work on 10.3 and 10.4 (even with
osx compiles set for 10.3 and 10.4 compatibility).  I guess we'll find
out.

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x31B0974B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: Scalability and fairness [was: P2P over Tor [was: Anomos - anonBT]]

2010-11-17 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:03:58 -0500
grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:

 Wish the mbox or maildir archives were available/mirrored for easy
 search, reading, reference and reply using native mail clients :)

...I wish people would stop cross-posting between -dev and -talk...;)

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x31B0974B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: Tor-node failed

2010-12-02 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:29:58 +
Orionjur Tor-admin tor-ad...@orionjurinform.com wrote:

 Last time my tor-node regularry fails. How can I debug causes of it?

https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#MyTorkeepscrashing.
The text at that url is a fine start.

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: Tor 0.2.2.19-alpha is out

2010-12-02 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:25:25 +
Matthew pump...@cotse.net wrote:
 In System / Administration / Software Sources / Authentication there
 is an deb.torproject.org archive signing key dated 2009-09-04 with
 the value 886DDD89.

This is correct.

 Am I correct to think that this key sufficient to verify updates when
 using sources.list. 

This is correct.

 Also, who exactly owns 886DDD89?  Is it a specific person or for 
 torproject.org as a whole?

If you gpg --list-sigs 0x886DDD89  You can see who signed the key.  It
is a role key that the packagers use to sign the builds, rather than
using their own personal keys.  It is up to you if you trust the key
and those who signed it implying validity.

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: Tor Email?

2010-12-29 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:02:34 -0500
grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:

  We've generally suggested gmail because their bulk account creation
  process was good. It seems this is not the case any more.
 
 What is this bulk account creation you speak of?

Gmail used to have the ability to stop bots from creating accounts en
masse.  gmail doesn't have this ability any more.

  This is false. I just created a gmail account via tor without
  needing a phone number or any other information.
 
 Hmm, you mean just, as in today? What exit were you using?
 Want to sell the account for bitcoins? Kidding :-)

As in around 08:45 AM EST. I didn't look to see which exit, it just
worked, just a captcha required.


-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: Tor and google groups

2011-01-05 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:18:09 +
Orionjur Tor-admin tor-ad...@orionjurinform.com wrote:
 Is it very difficult to buy a SIM without showing ID in the USA or
 countries of Western Europe? Sorry for such off topic but it is very
 interesting to know are there any countries in Western Europe or
 states of the USA when it is possible to buy a SIM without showing
 your ID with accordance to local law?

My $0.02 from buying SIM cards all over the world, I show them my
CostCo Club photo id.  In Hong Kong they wrote down my first/last name
as cost co.  No one has photocopied the ID yet.  Many shops ask for
it and then do nothing with it.  As explained to me in Belgium, the law
says they have to see an ID, not record, write down, and register the
sim in your name. Maybe I just found a cool shop by accident.

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: Home Internet with Anonymity Built In

2011-01-06 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 00:55:32 +0800
Trystero Lot lo...@callout.me wrote:

 will this work with linksys ata specially 3102?

We're just adding a correct tor configuration to openwrt.  If openwrt
supports your device, then our tor mods should as well.

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: Index of hidden services?

2011-01-07 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:22:58 -0600
Peter McCann mc...@freeovernetfoundation.org wrote:

 On the website describing how to set up a hidden service
 I saw a mention of a (hypothetical?) Hidden Services Wiki
 where pointers to hidden services are stored.  Does such a wiki exist?
 If so, where can I find it?

Years ago, there was a popular place called The hidden wiki which was
the only one in existence, that anyone knew about.  It was then
beseiged by child porn links and images and went away.  Since then,
many different services claiming to be the hidden wiki have
come and gone.

Someone also tried to setup a google search appliance to crawl all
of .onion space.  It didn't get very far for the obvious reason of
most hidden service sites don't want to be found by the general
population. The services don't link to each other, and they may be on
random ports.  It's possible one could create a search engine that
crawls every possible .onion hostname on common tcp ports (80, 443,
8080, 8443).  Over long periods of time, this may find many hidden
services.

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: geeez...

2011-01-11 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 02:29:49 +0100
Dirk noi...@gmx.net wrote:
 But I wan't a legally binding statement from a lawyer or an official
 (BSI) that running TOR exit nodes in germany is legal.

Ask the CCC for a start.  They have defended many Germans already.


-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: polipo-tor deb/ubuntu native package

2011-01-17 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:21:56 -0800
travis+ml-tor-t...@subspacefield.org wrote:
  The real answer is to fix firefox so it doesn't need a proxy
  between it and Tor.  We patch firefox to do just this in the osx
  and linux tor browser bundles.  Polipo was a fine kludge until
  either we started patching firefox or mozilla fixed their
  many-years-old socks bug.
 
 Hmm, I had no idea this was even available for Linux.
 
 It looks like a tarball - it's unclear how this will interact with a
 package manager, which likes to know which packages installed which
 files, and updates them automatically, etc.

Tor Browser Bundle isn't something to install, you extract and run.
I've seen a few linux users just double click the tar.gz file and run
from inside their archive extractor.

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


or-talk list migration Feb 19, 2011

2011-01-24 Thread Andrew Lewman
Hello or-talk subscribers,

On February 19, 2011, we are migrating or-talk from or-t...@seul.org to
tor-t...@lists.torproject.org.  We will migrate your e-mail address's
subscription to the new list. You will receive a confirmation from the
new mailing list software on the 19th.

Current or-talk archives will be migrated.  Roger plans to leave the
current archives in place at seul.org as well.

We're using this migration to spread administration out to Tor's
sysadmin team rather than making Roger do everything himself.  The
secondary benefits of having the lists on the torproject.org domain
include SSL-enabled login, archives, and easier account management.

You can subscribe to the new list at
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

I will send out a reminder on the day of the migration.

Please e-mail tor-assista...@torproject.org with any questions.

Thank you.  

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Tor exits in .edu space

2011-01-28 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:51:56 -0500
Flamsmark flamsm...@gmail.com wrote:
 I run a Tor exit node because I support the ubiquitous availability
 of strong anonymity for anyone who wants it. Tor is one of the
 strongest, best- researched, and most widely-used online anonymity
 system, and I want to help keep it running at maximum capacity.

First and foremost, thank you.  

 The support that I received from the project was somewhat limited,
 but I can't really imagine receiving that much more. I spoke with
 arma on the IRC channel, and he provided me with moral support, and
 offered to get me in touch with Ed Felten at Princeton's CITP. 

We're trying to figure this out ourselves.  I've personally been the
introduction point between exit relay operators and a lawyer in their
country to help them when something goes wrong.  I've spoken to a number
of organizations, such as law enforcement, Internet providers, and
schools about what Tor is, who uses it, and how we can help when
criminals use tor.  In some cases, I've travelled to meet people to
spend time with them and help them as best I can.  

Law enforcement organizations are generally surprised when we show up
to talk to them, to educate them, and explain that real people use tor
for real reasons.  If all you see all day are criminals using a hammer,
then clearly hammers are only for criminals.  It's the same with Tor.
It's frequently the case that their own investigators are using Tor to
hide their tracks online too, and are willing to show up to support us
and talk about how they use it.  I hope this helps stop SWAT teams from
kicking down doors when someone exits traffic for a jerk.

I've talked to people on the steps of their local police station just
after they were released from jail the night before.  I've talked to
people looking at academic suspension and huge fines because of a DMCA
notice.  This is why I started contacting law firms in various
countries to find resources for people,
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/start-tor-legal-support-directory.  It
needs more work, it needs someone with more legal background to write
up a case guide for other lawyers/solicitors/judge advocates.

I am always impressed that 95% of those accused of something due to
their exit node fight harder to keep running a Tor exit node.  It's
people like this that help keep your liberties around the world.  Once
again, thank you.

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: Is gatereloaded a Bad Exit?

2011-01-29 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:46:20 +0100
Jan Weiher j...@buksy.de wrote:
 This node looks suspicious to me, because there is no contact info
 given and the exit policy allows only unencrypted traffic:

It hasn't shown up in any of the exit scans as suspicious.  Lack of
contact info isn't a concern.  The exit policy is odd, yes.  However,
arguably those are also very popular ports as well.  

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: Question and Confirmation.

2011-01-30 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:15:17 +
Matthew pump...@cotse.net wrote:
 I'm still not getting this.  My understanding is that you have the
 data and the header when using TCP.  If only the data is encrypted
 then what happens to the headers?

Does this image help at all?

https://svn.torproject.org/svn/projects/presentations/images/tor-keys.svg

Your original data is tunnelled through tor.  Your original packets are
wrapped in onionskins and moved about the globe.  

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: Polipo bug reporting

2011-01-31 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:20:10 +
Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net wrote:
  Thank you Juliusz, I appreciate your efforts.
 Clearly Tor needs to ship with a working Polipo, so if this is a real
 fault would the bundle developers please revert to the version which
 was in the Vidalia 0.2.9 bundle, which is still working.

The difference is that the PPC bundle with vidalia 0.2.9 was built on a
10.3.9 ppc mac.  However, the 10.3.9 machine died a smelly, melty
death during a build a few months ago. The current bundles are built on
a 10.5 ppc mac with backwards compatibility for 10.3.9 (at least
according to xcode/gcc).  

Clearly Apple's backwards compatibility options don't work.

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: Is gatereloaded a Bad Exit?

2011-01-31 Thread Andrew Lewman
In my opinion, judging a relay based on exit policy is a slippery slope
we don't want to go down.  We never claim to make using Tor alone safer
than using the Internet at large.  Whether the creep is at Starbucks
sniffing the wifi or running a relay is irrelevant to me.  Encouraging
people to use encrypted communications, the https everywhere firefox
extension, and learn to be more secure online are some of our goals.
The Tor Browser Bundle, while still a work in progress, is the best way
to protect novice users and get them safer than they are without Tor.

I personally run encrypted services on unencrypted ports, like 25, 80,
143, 110, etc.  It's just a port number and only convention says port
80 has to be for http only.  

If people start doing deep packet inspection to enforce 80 is really
http or running filters in some misguided attempt to block bad
things through Tor, then those are reasons to 'badexit' relays.  There
are some obvious ways we can detect traffic manipulation through Tor
relays.  Today, we do detect them and badexit those relays.

If we're going to start censoring Tor exits based on impressions, we
might as well start blocking Tor relays that are rumoured to be run by
national intelligence agencies, criminal organizations, martians, and
other people we might not like.  In fact, we might as well go back to
the original model of every Tor relay operator has met and gained
Roger's trust. 

I want a diverse set of Tor relays. If people don't want to trust
relays based on whatever heuristics they want to use, great, use
ExcludeNodes in your torrc.  Don't punish everyone based on rumors and
impressions.

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: Scroogle and Tor

2011-02-13 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:09:56 -0500 (EST)
scroo...@lavabit.com wrote:

 I've been fighting two different Tor users for a week. Each is
 apparently having a good time trying to see how quickly they
 can get results from Scroogle searches via Tor exit nodes.

I've talked to a few services that do one of the following:

- Run a Tor exit enclave, which would only allow exit through Tor to
  your webservers.  There are a few services that run a tor client and
  simply block every IP in the consensus, except their exit enclave.

- Run a hidden service.  Due to the current state of hidden services,
  it'll slow down everything.

- Run a tor exit enclave against one, non-load balanced server for tor
  users. If someone abuses it, the reality of slower response times is a
  self-enforcing feedback loop. Of course, this sucks for the
  non-abusers.

- Rate limiting queries in the application.  The Google solution of
  CAPTCHA. The Yahoo/Bing solution of throwing up a temporary error
  page when queries cross some threshold per IP address.

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: or-talk list migration Feb 19, 2011

2011-02-13 Thread Andrew Lewman
A reminder that this migration occurs this week.

On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:05:03 -0500
Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org wrote:

 Hello or-talk subscribers,
 
 On February 19, 2011, we are migrating or-talk from or-t...@seul.org
 to tor-t...@lists.torproject.org.  We will migrate your e-mail
 address's subscription to the new list. You will receive a
 confirmation from the new mailing list software on the 19th.
 
 Current or-talk archives will be migrated.  Roger plans to leave the
 current archives in place at seul.org as well.
 
 We're using this migration to spread administration out to Tor's
 sysadmin team rather than making Roger do everything himself.  The
 secondary benefits of having the lists on the torproject.org domain
 include SSL-enabled login, archives, and easier account management.
 
 You can subscribe to the new list at
 https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
 
 I will send out a reminder on the day of the migration.
 
 Please e-mail tor-assista...@torproject.org with any questions.
 
 Thank you.  
 



-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


Re: or-talk list migration Feb 19, 2011

2011-02-19 Thread Andrew Lewman
A final reminder that this migration occurs today.

On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:35:14 -0500
Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org wrote:

 A reminder that this migration occurs this week.
 
 On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:05:03 -0500
 Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org wrote:
 
  Hello or-talk subscribers,
  
  On February 19, 2011, we are migrating or-talk from or-t...@seul.org
  to tor-t...@lists.torproject.org.  We will migrate your e-mail
  address's subscription to the new list. You will receive a
  confirmation from the new mailing list software on the 19th.
  
  Current or-talk archives will be migrated.  Roger plans to leave the
  current archives in place at seul.org as well.
  
  We're using this migration to spread administration out to Tor's
  sysadmin team rather than making Roger do everything himself.  The
  secondary benefits of having the lists on the torproject.org domain
  include SSL-enabled login, archives, and easier account management.
  
  You can subscribe to the new list at
  https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
  
  I will send out a reminder on the day of the migration.
  
  Please e-mail tor-assista...@torproject.org with any questions.
  
  Thank you.  
  
 
 
 



-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x74ED336B
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/


<    1   2   3