RE: Very Long Deployment Time
Title: Message
it is
VERY slow to deploy using the ORMI commands, it takes
FOREVER.
it is
much faster to use ANT to deploy via coping or ftping the .ear or .war files to
orion directly.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Peter
DunnSent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:27 PMTo:
Orion-InterestSubject: RE: Very Long Deployment
Time
I've
used delegates for the implementation logic from the EJB classes and created
a batch file that re-packages the delegate classes into the .jar file. It
takes less than 5 seconds for redeployment, only when I've changed my
interface do I redeploy the EJB, I've also done something similiar on
the web side of things minus the delegate bit. So my deployment looks
something like this.
ejb
MyClassDelegate package-name
5
seconds
web
MyClassServlet package-name
2-4
seconds
were
ejb and web are the names of my batch files.
MyClassEJB
...
public void doSomething()
{
delegate.doSomething();
}
}
-Original Message-From: Gustavo Comba
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001
8:34 AMTo: Orion-InterestSubject: Very Long Deployment
Time
Hello,
I'm deploying a little
project with a Client Application Module and a EJB Module with several EJB
(about 30 Entity and 5 Session Beans). I'm using JDeveloper 9i Release
Cantidate to develop/deploy my project.
My project compiles very
fast, but when I do the deployment, it take a very long time (about 10
minutes). I'm debugging now, and I'm deploying continously, and it's very
anoying!
There is something I can do
to accelerate the deployment proccess? Can I copy the .ear file directly
into the "applications" directory and start the server again? Help me
please!
Thanks in
advance,
Gustavo
Comba
RE: MDB using iBus JMS provider
you have to write resource wrapper around the external jms implementions
factory.
see the mail archive for an example
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> udi h bauman
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 12:51 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: MDB using iBus JMS provider
>
>
> Hi
>
> Help please: I've configured iBus//MessageServer to run as
> Orion's JMS
> provider, & have no problem sending messages from my EJBs &
> clients, but
> none of them reach my MDB's.
>
> In my client, when accessing the topic from the iBus
> TopicConnectionFactory
> I specify only the topic name ("MyTopic"), & in the
> orion-ejb-jar.xml I
> specify the full location
> (destination-location="java:comp/resource/MessageServer/MyTopi
> c"). Is this
> correct?
>
> Any help much appreciated!
> udi
>
>
>
RE: Transactions across a cluster Orion GURUS - please advise.
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Manuel De Jesus > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:18 AM > To: Orion-Interest > Subject: Transactions across a cluster Orion GURUS - please advise. > > > Hi All > > Has anyone actually tested orion transactions over a cluster > ? I am looking > at developing a CMP Entity Bean that stores an account balance for a > customer. If this entity bean is deployed on a cluster of 4 > servers and I > have and admin person and the actual customer do > transactions, will they be > looking at the same object instance even if their requests > are being served > on different servers ? Simple answer is maybe but probably not. > Will ACID be supported in this scenario ? transaction integrety with entity beans is done thru synchronization of the data by ejbload and ejbstore. the database handles this. > > I would greatly appreciate any help/advice on this. > > Regards, > Manuel > > >
RE: question about ip allocation
this is incorrect, they is a port 80 for each IP address. As long as the clients can access each IP address, they can get to either port 80. Now Orion may be listening to ALL ip addresses on port 80 making it "look" like there is only one port 80. But each interface as a full compliment of ports. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Maximilian Eberl > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:27 AM > To: Orion-Interest > Subject: Re: question about ip allocation > > > Your machine has 2 IP-adresses but only one port 80 ! > > No 2 servers can listen on 1 port - no matter how many > network cards You > pull in. > > You have to bind the IPs to different ports. > I am doing this on Linux but don't know how this is done on Windows. > > Max > > -- > > Maximilian Eberl > - developer - > netzdenker.de > http://www.netzdenker.de mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ludwigstrasse 2 D-67346 Speyer / Germany tel: +49-6232-2602-02 fax: +49-6232-2602-05
RE: Specifying transaction.log location
Title: Message it is a argument when you start the server -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lee SmithSent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:17 AMTo: Orion-InterestSubject: Specifying transaction.log location Hi There, Just a nice easy question - I was wondering if somebody could tell me if there is a way to specify the location of the transaction.log file. By default this is placed at: /persistence/transaction.log I've have a look through all the configuration files, but the only piece of information I could find that appeared to be relevant was the tag in application.xml - this doesn't seem to effect where the transaction.log goes however. Thanks in advance for any help. Cheers, Lee
RE: modeling tool
Title: Message in my opinion, and I have been using modeling tools as part of every project since 1995! For Java projects there is only one tool, Together! -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Vinícius de Faria SilvaSent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 3:29 PMTo: Orion-InterestSubject: modeling tool Hey guys, i'd like to hear your comments about this situation. My team has a well defined development process, for developing j2ee web apps. This is a lightweight process based on uml diagrams. Our Java IDE is JDeveloper9i and we are happy about it. We need now to get a uml graphical modeling tool, which support the analisys/design phases of the development process. JDeveloper9i doesn't support all the uml diagrams we need. At the same time we don't want to spend a lot of money with a tool that will bring much more than we need(process development, java IDE and so on). I'm wondering to know what you guys think about it... thanks in advance, Vinícius
SQL Server JDBC driver from Microsoft
has anyone gotten this to work with Orion 1.5.4? If so are there any "gotchas" or anything that I should look out for, I want to use it to develop against.
Trying to get opensymphony transform tags to work with Orion 1.5.4
anyone use these custom tags, I am trying to get this installed and can not remember how I did it last time on 1.5.2?
RE: idea=$395.00USD was: RE: Java IDE?
At 12:18 AM 3/24/2002, you wrote: >You can't afford $400?!? where the hell are all you >cheap bastards working that you can't scrape up $400? >I think you all need to focus a little harder on >working and spending less time looking at porn; then >maybe you could get a job that would afford you a >salary that gives you disposable income I could >come up with $400 in two months just by bringing lunch >to work from home... > >IDEA has rediculously high ROI. And it's normally high >productivity is skyrocketed if you are refactoring >because of all the advanced refactoring features it >has. > >IDEA was written by people who apparently actually use >the editor they're selling. JBuilder is probably used >for JBuilder, too, but look at how long it takes >Borland to crank out new useless features; Intellij >does it every week. > >to sum it up: get a job that pays well you slackers! >(or at least cut down on the ammount you spend on porn >every month) > >Noah I have to agree Noah, I won't work for anyone that does not have the budget for tools, that means they don't have the budget to afford me. Then again I have been a Senior Systems Architect for 8 years now, and have worked on large enterprise scale projects for 10 years now. Personally having at least ONE license for Together from TogetherSoft is a requirement for me to take a job. I have not used IDEA because I have lots of custom modules I have created for Together and just have not seen the need, I may download it and try it out, even though I don't need " new useless features every week " once a year like Borland does is fine for me ;-) Personally I use LOTS of tools for different tasks. 1. SlickEdit can not be beat for pounding out quicky command line tools in any language, its support for "code insight" is un-matched in any IDE esp for Java. It is awesome for cranking out straight C/C++ that use a command line interface also. For projects with hundreds of classes in dozens of packages it does get a little cumbersome. That is when I use Together. IDEA looks like the closest competitor that SlickEdit has right now so I would probably say if you don't like SlickEdit then consider IDEA. 2. Together is a MUST for anything that is close to enterprise wide development and has multiple developers, code trees, or any kind of complexity, I only work on extemely large scale projects, that usually have legacy code that has to be dug thru to port to a J2EE container. The key to together is the SEEMLESS round trip engineering and code generation from diagram to code and back again, and seemless integrations with other external editors ( I tend to use SlickEdit as the editor for Together ). If you don't "GET" the value of a tool like Together you are not doing serious development. There is a FREE community edition for Together with no time limits and most of the "useless features" removed. If you try it and don't understand what it brings to the development cycle of real world enterprise development efforts you got a ways to go in your career. 3. JBuilder is great for "cowboy" programming for small shops where you and only you have to work on a code base ( ala Visual Basic ), the new 6 version has one of the prettiest UML diagram generators I have ever seen, but the it does have some things I don't like. I like to use it for GUI based applications and things that need a RAD style developement cycle ( ala VB again ). JBuilder support ANY JDK version unlike the uniformed want to say, all these tools support any JDK, I am using 1.4 in EVERY tool mentioned in this letter with NO PROBLEMS. In my experience people that complain about the price of tools or say that vi is all they need either aren't working on real world enterprise projects or are not real world programmers, ANYTHING that can increase my productivity is worth buying, simply because my TIME is worth MORE than anything else, it is priceless. If you worked on some of the projects I have in the last 6 years you would understand how silly all this vi and emacs and the jdk is all you need rehtoric is. Every minute I SAVE by using a tool gives me a minute to spend with my wife, family, riding my motorcycles, recording music, working on my movie, sleeping or anything else, you get the idea. To paraphrase a shampoo commerical "yeah Together is expensive, but I am worth it"! I mean if you suck at playing guitar you a crappy guitar will do, because no matter how much the guitar costs, you will still suck. If you don't have any good program design skills then the most expensive IDE will not make your program designs any better. But they will make someone that knows what they are doing work MUCH faster and be more effective. So anyone that chants the "FREE mantra" keep using Tomcat and Vi and all the other "free" crap because in the end it will cost you HUNDREDS TIMES more than buying a proper tool and saving money over the long haul. Then again if you are lowba
Re: idea=$395.00USD
At 07:28 PM 3/24/2002, you wrote: >On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Maximilian Eberl wrote: > > > You can't afford $400?!? where the hell are all you > > > cheap bastards working that you can't scrape up $400? > > > I think you all need to focus a little harder on > > > working and spending less time looking at porn; > > > > I really do not think that this is an appropriate discussion style for a > > mailing list of developers of whom - I suppose - the majority has an IQ of > > 90 points or even more. > >Pardon my elitism, but developers with an IQ of 90 aren't going to be very >good developers, and such people *really* want to invest their money in >the best tools possible, in order to eke out every last drop of >performance they can muster. After all, that's below average. > >On the other hand, maybe develoeprs with IQ of 90 are part of why our >industry has such a crappy success rate. now that is the truth!
Re: Orion EJB 2.0 final
At 12:17 PM 3/25/2002, you wrote: >Hi, >does anyone know when Orion will be 100% EJB 2.0 compatible including >local/remote inerfaces EJB-QL ... > >Michael I would just be happy with the JMS working correctly, have the JMS message types don't work at all! This includes most of the really neat stuff in the MDB spec, which is missing!
Re: is Orion dead?
At 03:41 PM 4/11/2002, you wrote: >Whats the current state of Ironflare and Orion? > >Nothing has changed in the 'stable release' of Orion for almost a year, even >though there are glaring bugs in http session clustering (not even fixed in >1.5.4) and some significantly lacking components. Ironflare was supposed >to be in the pavillion at JavaONE, but oddly they had no write up >(apparently they didn't submit one), and didn't actually show up (so their >booth was empty). There also seems to be a conspicuous infrequency to their >responses here. > >I know that Oracle 9iAS is evolving and expanding, and I believe that >IronFlare is doing a significant amount of work on the 9iAS code base (as >consultants?). But whats to become of Orion? It almost appears that Oracel >has consumed Orion completely and no development will happen on the old >Orion. looks like someone finally figured it out! this is what happens when you get one big "customer" with a guaranteed revenue stream, can't much blame them myself.
