Re: Web Development

2011-08-11 Thread Stephen Price
I think it's pros and cons, not cons and pros.

come on, there's a standard here, pick up your game. ;)

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Arjang Assadi arjang.ass...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi Michael,

 I also used to think that webforms is the wrong way of doing web
 development, but have found that the two model have their own cons and
 pros.
 I would recomend doing MVC but without having anything against the Web
 Forms model,
 Web Forms Model is now the quick and dirty way for small apps that
 would never need to see the daylight beyound being prototype, like
 every other App that went from prototype to being exactly what
 customer wanted!

 Regards

 Arjang

 On 10 August 2011 15:11, Michael Ridland rid...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi
 
  Smart Employers look for someone who's smart, can learn and gets things
  done. I would take on someone based on that not what specific platform
  knowledge they had.
 
  It's great to learn MVC first. Learning WebForms will teach you the wrong
  way to do web development.
 
  ps, where are you based? can you send me your CV I might know someone
  interested?
 
  Thanks,
 
  Michael Ridland | ThinkSmart Digital
  Managing Director
  P. 0404 865 350
  E. mich...@thinksmartdigital.com.au
  W. www.thinksmartdigital.com.au
  T. www.twitter.com/rid00z
  L. au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland
 
  On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Simon Kuldin
  sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:
 
  Hi William,
 
 
 
  Thanks.. maybe I’ll have a go at the exam once I’ve done enough study
 via
  the pluralsight website.  That being said, I probably should have
 started
  with WebForms rather than MVC, but I’m already curious with MVC now.
 
 
 
  From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
  On Behalf Of William Luu
  Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 1:10 PM
 
  To: ozDotNet
  Subject: Re: Web Development
 
 
 
  Hi Simon, perhaps if you passed one of those MS ASP.NET exams it may
 help?
 
 
 
  Maybe this one? 70-515: Web Applications Development with Microsoft
 .NET
  Framework 4
 http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/exam.aspx?ID=70-515
 
  On 10 August 2011 13:02, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
  wrote:
 
  Cheers for the feedback… I guess I just have to continue on with my home
  attempts at building a website via ASP MVC 3…
 
 
 
  From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
  On Behalf Of William Luu
  Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:48 PM
  To: ozDotNet
  Subject: Re: Web Development
 
 
 
  Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does mean
 it
  may be a little more difficult to get through the door for the first
  interview compared with someone else who has the same amount of .NET
  experience as yourself, but as an ASP.NET dev.
 
 
 
  That said, it also depends on what the company that is hiring is after.
  I'm sure there are many companies out there that are actively searching
 for
  good .NET developers and would happily give you a go.
 
  On 10 August 2011 12:26, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
  wrote:
 
  I meant *un*employable
 
 
 
  From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
  On Behalf Of Simon Kuldin
  Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
  To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
  Subject: Web Development
 
 
 
  Hey there everyone,
 
 
 
  It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there,
  require a decent level of ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean I’m
 pretty
  much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET experience, despite
 my
  level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact Framework
 development?
 
 
 
  I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don’t have any real work
 experience
  with it yet.
 
 
 
  I feel like I’m fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a
 full-time
  Dot Net development role (I’m only doing Dot Net development as a
 portion of
  my job at the moment).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Re: Web Development

2011-08-11 Thread Michael Ridland
Hi

I was only talking in reference to learning web development, not into the
pros and cons for a seasoned web developer.

Thanks

*Michael Ridland | ThinkSmart Digital*
Managing Director
P. 0404 865 350
E. mich...@thinksmartdigital.com.au
W. www.thinksmartdigital.com.au
T. www.twitter.com/rid00z
L. au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland


On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Arjang Assadi arjang.ass...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi Michael,

 I also used to think that webforms is the wrong way of doing web
 development, but have found that the two model have their own cons and
 pros.
 I would recomend doing MVC but without having anything against the Web
 Forms model,
 Web Forms Model is now the quick and dirty way for small apps that
 would never need to see the daylight beyound being prototype, like
 every other App that went from prototype to being exactly what
 customer wanted!

 Regards

 Arjang

 On 10 August 2011 15:11, Michael Ridland rid...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi
 
  Smart Employers look for someone who's smart, can learn and gets things
  done. I would take on someone based on that not what specific platform
  knowledge they had.
 
  It's great to learn MVC first. Learning WebForms will teach you the wrong
  way to do web development.
 
  ps, where are you based? can you send me your CV I might know someone
  interested?
 
  Thanks,
 
  Michael Ridland | ThinkSmart Digital
  Managing Director
  P. 0404 865 350
  E. mich...@thinksmartdigital.com.au
  W. www.thinksmartdigital.com.au
  T. www.twitter.com/rid00z
  L. au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland
 
  On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Simon Kuldin
  sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:
 
  Hi William,
 
 
 
  Thanks.. maybe I’ll have a go at the exam once I’ve done enough study
 via
  the pluralsight website.  That being said, I probably should have
 started
  with WebForms rather than MVC, but I’m already curious with MVC now.
 
 
 
  From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
  On Behalf Of William Luu
  Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 1:10 PM
 
  To: ozDotNet
  Subject: Re: Web Development
 
 
 
  Hi Simon, perhaps if you passed one of those MS ASP.NET exams it may
 help?
 
 
 
  Maybe this one? 70-515: Web Applications Development with Microsoft
 .NET
  Framework 4
 http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/exam.aspx?ID=70-515
 
  On 10 August 2011 13:02, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
  wrote:
 
  Cheers for the feedback… I guess I just have to continue on with my home
  attempts at building a website via ASP MVC 3…
 
 
 
  From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
  On Behalf Of William Luu
  Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:48 PM
  To: ozDotNet
  Subject: Re: Web Development
 
 
 
  Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does mean
 it
  may be a little more difficult to get through the door for the first
  interview compared with someone else who has the same amount of .NET
  experience as yourself, but as an ASP.NET dev.
 
 
 
  That said, it also depends on what the company that is hiring is after.
  I'm sure there are many companies out there that are actively searching
 for
  good .NET developers and would happily give you a go.
 
  On 10 August 2011 12:26, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
  wrote:
 
  I meant *un*employable
 
 
 
  From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
  On Behalf Of Simon Kuldin
  Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
  To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
  Subject: Web Development
 
 
 
  Hey there everyone,
 
 
 
  It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there,
  require a decent level of ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean I’m
 pretty
  much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET experience, despite
 my
  level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact Framework
 development?
 
 
 
  I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don’t have any real work
 experience
  with it yet.
 
 
 
  I feel like I’m fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a
 full-time
  Dot Net development role (I’m only doing Dot Net development as a
 portion of
  my job at the moment).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






 http://au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland


Re: Web Development

2011-08-10 Thread DotNet Dude
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Michael Ridland rid...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi

 Smart Employers look for someone who's smart, can learn and gets things
 done. I would take on someone based on that not what specific platform
 knowledge they had.

Haven't run into any of those recently. Nailed the interview last
month but got turned down for doing vb the last 2 years and not c#.
Probably better i didn't go there anyways i guess but left a sour
taste in my mouth


 It's great to learn MVC first. Learning WebForms will teach you the wrong
 way to do web development.

 ps, where are you based? can you send me your CV I might know someone
 interested?

 Thanks,

 Michael Ridland | ThinkSmart Digital
 Managing Director
 P. 0404 865 350
 E. mich...@thinksmartdigital.com.au
 W. www.thinksmartdigital.com.au
 T. www.twitter.com/rid00z
 L. au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland

 On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Simon Kuldin
 sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:

 Hi William,



 Thanks.. maybe I’ll have a go at the exam once I’ve done enough study via
 the pluralsight website.  That being said, I probably should have started
 with WebForms rather than MVC, but I’m already curious with MVC now.



 From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
 On Behalf Of William Luu
 Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 1:10 PM

 To: ozDotNet
 Subject: Re: Web Development



 Hi Simon, perhaps if you passed one of those MS ASP.NET exams it may help?



 Maybe this one? 70-515: Web Applications Development with Microsoft .NET
 Framework 4 http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/exam.aspx?ID=70-515

 On 10 August 2011 13:02, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
 wrote:

 Cheers for the feedback… I guess I just have to continue on with my home
 attempts at building a website via ASP MVC 3…



 From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
 On Behalf Of William Luu
 Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:48 PM
 To: ozDotNet
 Subject: Re: Web Development



 Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does mean it
 may be a little more difficult to get through the door for the first
 interview compared with someone else who has the same amount of .NET
 experience as yourself, but as an ASP.NET dev.



 That said, it also depends on what the company that is hiring is after.
 I'm sure there are many companies out there that are actively searching for
 good .NET developers and would happily give you a go.

 On 10 August 2011 12:26, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
 wrote:

 I meant *un*employable



 From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
 On Behalf Of Simon Kuldin
 Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
 To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
 Subject: Web Development



 Hey there everyone,



 It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there,
 require a decent level of ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean I’m pretty
 much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET experience, despite my
 level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact Framework development?



 I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don’t have any real work experience
 with it yet.



 I feel like I’m fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a full-time
 Dot Net development role (I’m only doing Dot Net development as a portion of
 my job at the moment).












RE: Web Development

2011-08-10 Thread Paul Evrat
All,

A question from an amateur -  What would the split be roughly of
professional developers and larger developer organisations that use VB
compared to C# ?

Is one any better than the other for particular purposes?

Regards ... Paul Evrat ..



-Original Message-
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of DotNet Dude
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 4:28 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Web Development

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Michael Ridland rid...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi

 Smart Employers look for someone who's smart, can learn and gets things
 done. I would take on someone based on that not what specific platform
 knowledge they had.

Haven't run into any of those recently. Nailed the interview last
month but got turned down for doing vb the last 2 years and not c#.
Probably better i didn't go there anyways i guess but left a sour
taste in my mouth


 It's great to learn MVC first. Learning WebForms will teach you the wrong
 way to do web development.

 ps, where are you based? can you send me your CV I might know someone
 interested?

 Thanks,

 Michael Ridland | ThinkSmart Digital
 Managing Director
 P. 0404 865 350
 E. mich...@thinksmartdigital.com.au
 W. www.thinksmartdigital.com.au
 T. www.twitter.com/rid00z
 L. au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland

 On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Simon Kuldin
 sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:

 Hi William,



 Thanks.. maybe I’ll have a go at the exam once I’ve done enough study via
 the pluralsight website.  That being said, I probably should have started
 with WebForms rather than MVC, but I’m already curious with MVC now.



 From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
 On Behalf Of William Luu
 Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 1:10 PM

 To: ozDotNet
 Subject: Re: Web Development



 Hi Simon, perhaps if you passed one of those MS ASP.NET exams it may
help?



 Maybe this one? 70-515: Web Applications Development with Microsoft .NET
 Framework 4 http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/exam.aspx?ID=70-515

 On 10 August 2011 13:02, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
 wrote:

 Cheers for the feedback… I guess I just have to continue on with my home
 attempts at building a website via ASP MVC 3…



 From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
 On Behalf Of William Luu
 Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:48 PM
 To: ozDotNet
 Subject: Re: Web Development



 Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does mean
it
 may be a little more difficult to get through the door for the first
 interview compared with someone else who has the same amount of .NET
 experience as yourself, but as an ASP.NET dev.



 That said, it also depends on what the company that is hiring is after.
 I'm sure there are many companies out there that are actively searching
for
 good .NET developers and would happily give you a go.

 On 10 August 2011 12:26, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
 wrote:

 I meant *un*employable



 From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
 On Behalf Of Simon Kuldin
 Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
 To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
 Subject: Web Development



 Hey there everyone,



 It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there,
 require a decent level of ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean I’m pretty
 much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET experience, despite my
 level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact Framework
development?



 I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don’t have any real work experience
 with it yet.



 I feel like I’m fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a full-time
 Dot Net development role (I’m only doing Dot Net development as a portion
of
 my job at the moment).













RE: Web Development

2011-08-10 Thread Richard Blackman
Is one any better than the other for particular purposes?

The main difference as far I am concerned is C# is traditionally a strongly 
typed language and VB is not. So developing with C# you will have the overhead 
of having to specify the types of your variables eg string foo but the 
compiler will be able to let you know of some problems with your code earlier 
(at compile time before you run the app).

The rest really is a matter of whether you like the syntax of the language or 
not.

Disclaimer: C# programmer with limited exposure to vb6 (no vb.net).

-Original Message-
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of Paul Evrat
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 2:41 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: Web Development

All,

A question from an amateur -  What would the split be roughly of professional 
developers and larger developer organisations that use VB compared to C# ?

Is one any better than the other for particular purposes?

Regards ... Paul Evrat ..



-Original Message-
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of DotNet Dude
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 4:28 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Web Development

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Michael Ridland rid...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi

 Smart Employers look for someone who's smart, can learn and gets 
 things done. I would take on someone based on that not what specific 
 platform knowledge they had.

Haven't run into any of those recently. Nailed the interview last month but got 
turned down for doing vb the last 2 years and not c#.
Probably better i didn't go there anyways i guess but left a sour taste in my 
mouth


 It's great to learn MVC first. Learning WebForms will teach you the 
 wrong way to do web development.

 ps, where are you based? can you send me your CV I might know someone 
 interested?

 Thanks,

 Michael Ridland | ThinkSmart Digital
 Managing Director
 P. 0404 865 350
 E. mich...@thinksmartdigital.com.au
 W. www.thinksmartdigital.com.au
 T. www.twitter.com/rid00z
 L. au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland

 On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Simon Kuldin 
 sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:

 Hi William,



 Thanks.. maybe I'll have a go at the exam once I've done enough study 
 via the pluralsight website.  That being said, I probably should have 
 started with WebForms rather than MVC, but I'm already curious with MVC now.



 From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
 On Behalf Of William Luu
 Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 1:10 PM

 To: ozDotNet
 Subject: Re: Web Development



 Hi Simon, perhaps if you passed one of those MS ASP.NET exams it may
help?



 Maybe this one? 70-515: Web Applications Development with Microsoft 
 .NET Framework 4 
 http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/exam.aspx?ID=70-515

 On 10 August 2011 13:02, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
 wrote:

 Cheers for the feedback. I guess I just have to continue on with my 
 home attempts at building a website via ASP MVC 3.



 From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
 On Behalf Of William Luu
 Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:48 PM
 To: ozDotNet
 Subject: Re: Web Development



 Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does 
 mean
it
 may be a little more difficult to get through the door for the first 
 interview compared with someone else who has the same amount of .NET 
 experience as yourself, but as an ASP.NET dev.



 That said, it also depends on what the company that is hiring is after.
 I'm sure there are many companies out there that are actively 
 searching
for
 good .NET developers and would happily give you a go.

 On 10 August 2011 12:26, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
 wrote:

 I meant *un*employable



 From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
 On Behalf Of Simon Kuldin
 Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
 To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
 Subject: Web Development



 Hey there everyone,



 It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out 
 there, require a decent level of ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean 
 I'm pretty much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET 
 experience, despite my level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and 
 Compact Framework
development?



 I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don't have any real work 
 experience with it yet.



 I feel like I'm fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a 
 full-time Dot Net development role (I'm only doing Dot Net 
 development as a portion
of
 my job at the moment).













RE: Web Development

2011-08-10 Thread Bill McCarthy
Hi Richard,

That's incorrect. VB has strict typing: see Option Strict On, so it has the
same at compile time features as C# does in regards to strict typing. In
regard to dynamic typing , interop with COM, VB has some advantages, but as
of .NET 4, C# has tended to catch up there.

I'd say the main differences are:

VB has declarative event handling: this makes the code editor experience a
lot richer when using controls/components

VB has integrated XML: seriously it is the language of choice for XLINQ

C# has unsafe code

Other than that it's mainly style such as brace matching in C# (oh such fun
g)



|-Original Message-
|From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-
|boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Richard Blackman
|Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 5:14 PM
|To: ozDotNet
|Subject: RE: Web Development
|
|Is one any better than the other for particular purposes?
|
|The main difference as far I am concerned is C# is traditionally a strongly
typed
|language and VB is not. So developing with C# you will have the overhead of
|having to specify the types of your variables eg string foo but the
compiler will
|be able to let you know of some problems with your code earlier (at compile
time
|before you run the app).
|
|The rest really is a matter of whether you like the syntax of the language
or not.
|
|Disclaimer: C# programmer with limited exposure to vb6 (no vb.net).
|
|-Original Message-
|From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-
|boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Paul Evrat
|Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 2:41 PM
|To: 'ozDotNet'
|Subject: RE: Web Development
|
|All,
|
|A question from an amateur -  What would the split be roughly of
professional
|developers and larger developer organisations that use VB compared to C# ?
|
|Is one any better than the other for particular purposes?
|
|Regards ... Paul Evrat ..
|
|
|
|-Original Message-
|From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-
|boun...@ozdotnet.com]
|On Behalf Of DotNet Dude
|Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 4:28 PM
|To: ozDotNet
|Subject: Re: Web Development
|
|On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Michael Ridland rid...@gmail.com wrote:
| Hi
|
| Smart Employers look for someone who's smart, can learn and gets
| things done. I would take on someone based on that not what specific
| platform knowledge they had.
|
|Haven't run into any of those recently. Nailed the interview last month but
got
|turned down for doing vb the last 2 years and not c#.
|Probably better i didn't go there anyways i guess but left a sour taste in
my mouth
|
|
| It's great to learn MVC first. Learning WebForms will teach you the
| wrong way to do web development.
|
| ps, where are you based? can you send me your CV I might know someone
| interested?
|
| Thanks,
|
| Michael Ridland | ThinkSmart Digital
| Managing Director
| P. 0404 865 350
| E. mich...@thinksmartdigital.com.au
| W. www.thinksmartdigital.com.au
| T. www.twitter.com/rid00z
| L. au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland
|
| On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Simon Kuldin
| sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:
|
| Hi William,
|
|
|
| Thanks.. maybe I'll have a go at the exam once I've done enough study
| via the pluralsight website.  That being said, I probably should have
| started with WebForms rather than MVC, but I'm already curious with MVC
|now.
|
|
|
| From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
|[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
| On Behalf Of William Luu
| Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 1:10 PM
|
| To: ozDotNet
| Subject: Re: Web Development
|
|
|
| Hi Simon, perhaps if you passed one of those MS ASP.NET exams it may
|help?
|
|
|
| Maybe this one? 70-515: Web Applications Development with Microsoft
| .NET Framework 4
| http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/exam.aspx?ID=70-515
|
| On 10 August 2011 13:02, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
| wrote:
|
| Cheers for the feedback. I guess I just have to continue on with my
| home attempts at building a website via ASP MVC 3.
|
|
|
| From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
|[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
| On Behalf Of William Luu
| Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:48 PM
| To: ozDotNet
| Subject: Re: Web Development
|
|
|
| Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does
| mean
|it
| may be a little more difficult to get through the door for the first
| interview compared with someone else who has the same amount of .NET
| experience as yourself, but as an ASP.NET dev.
|
|
|
| That said, it also depends on what the company that is hiring is after.
| I'm sure there are many companies out there that are actively
| searching
|for
| good .NET developers and would happily give you a go.
|
| On 10 August 2011 12:26, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
| wrote:
|
| I meant *un*employable
|
|
|
| From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
|[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
| On Behalf Of Simon Kuldin
| Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
| To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
| Subject: Web Development

Re: Web Development

2011-08-10 Thread Michael Ridland
I'm a c# developer and to be honest I think VB is a underrated language, but
I still like C# because I'm more familiar with it.


*Michael Ridland | ThinkSmart Digital*
Managing Director
P. 0404 865 350
E. mich...@thinksmartdigital.com.au
W. www.thinksmartdigital.com.au
T. www.twitter.com/rid00z
L. au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland

http://au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland


 http://au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland


On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Bill McCarthy 
bill.mccarthy.li...@live.com.au wrote:

 Hi Richard,

 That's incorrect. VB has strict typing: see Option Strict On, so it has the
 same at compile time features as C# does in regards to strict typing. In
 regard to dynamic typing , interop with COM, VB has some advantages, but as
 of .NET 4, C# has tended to catch up there.

 I'd say the main differences are:

 VB has declarative event handling: this makes the code editor experience a
 lot richer when using controls/components

 VB has integrated XML: seriously it is the language of choice for XLINQ

 C# has unsafe code

 Other than that it's mainly style such as brace matching in C# (oh such fun
 g)



 |-Original Message-
 |From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-
 |boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Richard Blackman
 |Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 5:14 PM
 |To: ozDotNet
 |Subject: RE: Web Development
 |
 |Is one any better than the other for particular purposes?
 |
 |The main difference as far I am concerned is C# is traditionally a
 strongly
 typed
 |language and VB is not. So developing with C# you will have the overhead
 of
 |having to specify the types of your variables eg string foo but the
 compiler will
 |be able to let you know of some problems with your code earlier (at
 compile
 time
 |before you run the app).
 |
 |The rest really is a matter of whether you like the syntax of the language
 or not.
 |
 |Disclaimer: C# programmer with limited exposure to vb6 (no vb.net).
 |
 |-Original Message-
 |From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-
 |boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Paul Evrat
 |Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 2:41 PM
 |To: 'ozDotNet'
 |Subject: RE: Web Development
 |
 |All,
 |
 |A question from an amateur -  What would the split be roughly of
 professional
 |developers and larger developer organisations that use VB compared to C# ?
 |
 |Is one any better than the other for particular purposes?
 |
 |Regards ... Paul Evrat ..
 |
 |
 |
 |-Original Message-
 |From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-
 |boun...@ozdotnet.com]
 |On Behalf Of DotNet Dude
 |Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 4:28 PM
 |To: ozDotNet
 |Subject: Re: Web Development
 |
 |On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Michael Ridland rid...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 | Hi
 |
 | Smart Employers look for someone who's smart, can learn and gets
 | things done. I would take on someone based on that not what specific
 | platform knowledge they had.
 |
 |Haven't run into any of those recently. Nailed the interview last month
 but
 got
 |turned down for doing vb the last 2 years and not c#.
 |Probably better i didn't go there anyways i guess but left a sour taste in
 my mouth
 |
 |
 | It's great to learn MVC first. Learning WebForms will teach you the
 | wrong way to do web development.
 |
 | ps, where are you based? can you send me your CV I might know someone
 | interested?
 |
 | Thanks,
 |
 | Michael Ridland | ThinkSmart Digital
 | Managing Director
 | P. 0404 865 350
 | E. mich...@thinksmartdigital.com.au
 | W. www.thinksmartdigital.com.au
 | T. www.twitter.com/rid00z
 | L. au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland
 |
 | On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Simon Kuldin
 | sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:
 |
 | Hi William,
 |
 |
 |
 | Thanks.. maybe I'll have a go at the exam once I've done enough study
 | via the pluralsight website.  That being said, I probably should have
 | started with WebForms rather than MVC, but I'm already curious with MVC
 |now.
 |
 |
 |
 | From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
 |[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
 | On Behalf Of William Luu
 | Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 1:10 PM
 |
 | To: ozDotNet
 | Subject: Re: Web Development
 |
 |
 |
 | Hi Simon, perhaps if you passed one of those MS ASP.NET exams it may
 |help?
 |
 |
 |
 | Maybe this one? 70-515: Web Applications Development with Microsoft
 | .NET Framework 4
 | http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/exam.aspx?ID=70-515
 |
 | On 10 August 2011 13:02, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
 | wrote:
 |
 | Cheers for the feedback. I guess I just have to continue on with my
 | home attempts at building a website via ASP MVC 3.
 |
 |
 |
 | From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
 |[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
 | On Behalf Of William Luu
 | Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:48 PM
 | To: ozDotNet
 | Subject: Re: Web Development
 |
 |
 |
 | Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does
 | mean
 |it
 | may be a little more difficult to get through the door

RE: Web Development

2011-08-10 Thread David Kean
+1 on this. Come join Microsofthttp://careers.microsoft.com/, we don't care 
what language or technologies you've used. We've got lots of open positions on 
the .NET Framework and in the Developer Division if you're interested.

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of Michael Ridland
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 10:11 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Web Development

Hi

Smart Employers look for someone who's smart, can learn and gets things done. I 
would take on someone based on that not what specific platform knowledge they 
had.

It's great to learn MVC first. Learning WebForms will teach you the wrong way 
to do web development.

ps, where are you based? can you send me your CV I might know someone 
interested?

Thanks,

Michael Ridland | ThinkSmart Digital
Managing Director
P. 0404 865 350
E. mich...@thinksmartdigital.com.aumailto:mich...@thinksmartdigital.com.au
W. www.thinksmartdigital.com.auhttp://www.thinksmartdigital.com.au/
T. www.twitter.com/rid00zhttp://www.twitter.com/rid00z
L. au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridlandhttp://au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland



On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Simon Kuldin 
sim...@prism-solutions.com.aumailto:sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:
Hi William,

Thanks.. maybe I'll have a go at the exam once I've done enough study via the 
pluralsight website.  That being said, I probably should have started with 
WebForms rather than MVC, but I'm already curious with MVC now.

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.commailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com 
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.commailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of William Luu
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 1:10 PM

To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Web Development

Hi Simon, perhaps if you passed one of those MS ASP.NEThttp://ASP.NET exams 
it may help?

Maybe this one? 70-515: Web Applications Development with Microsoft .NET 
Framework 4 http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/exam.aspx?ID=70-515
On 10 August 2011 13:02, Simon Kuldin 
sim...@prism-solutions.com.aumailto:sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:
Cheers for the feedback... I guess I just have to continue on with my home 
attempts at building a website via ASP MVC 3...

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.commailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com 
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.commailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of William Luu
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:48 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Web Development

Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does mean it may 
be a little more difficult to get through the door for the first interview 
compared with someone else who has the same amount of .NET experience as 
yourself, but as an ASP.NEThttp://ASP.NET dev.

That said, it also depends on what the company that is hiring is after. I'm 
sure there are many companies out there that are actively searching for good 
.NET developers and would happily give you a go.
On 10 August 2011 12:26, Simon Kuldin 
sim...@prism-solutions.com.aumailto:sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:
I meant *un*employable

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.commailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com 
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.commailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of Simon Kuldin
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.commailto:ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
Subject: Web Development

Hey there everyone,

It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there, 
require a decent level of ASP.NEThttp://ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean 
I'm pretty much employable since I have little to no ASP.NEThttp://ASP.NET 
experience, despite my level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact 
Framework development?

I am studying ASP.NEThttp://ASP.NET when I can, but don't have any real work 
experience with it yet.

I feel like I'm fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a full-time Dot 
Net development role (I'm only doing Dot Net development as a portion of my job 
at the moment).






http://au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland



Re: Web Development

2011-08-10 Thread Arjang Assadi
Hi Michael,

I also used to think that webforms is the wrong way of doing web
development, but have found that the two model have their own cons and
pros.
I would recomend doing MVC but without having anything against the Web
Forms model,
Web Forms Model is now the quick and dirty way for small apps that
would never need to see the daylight beyound being prototype, like
every other App that went from prototype to being exactly what
customer wanted!

Regards

Arjang

On 10 August 2011 15:11, Michael Ridland rid...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi

 Smart Employers look for someone who's smart, can learn and gets things
 done. I would take on someone based on that not what specific platform
 knowledge they had.

 It's great to learn MVC first. Learning WebForms will teach you the wrong
 way to do web development.

 ps, where are you based? can you send me your CV I might know someone
 interested?

 Thanks,

 Michael Ridland | ThinkSmart Digital
 Managing Director
 P. 0404 865 350
 E. mich...@thinksmartdigital.com.au
 W. www.thinksmartdigital.com.au
 T. www.twitter.com/rid00z
 L. au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland

 On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Simon Kuldin
 sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:

 Hi William,



 Thanks.. maybe I’ll have a go at the exam once I’ve done enough study via
 the pluralsight website.  That being said, I probably should have started
 with WebForms rather than MVC, but I’m already curious with MVC now.



 From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
 On Behalf Of William Luu
 Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 1:10 PM

 To: ozDotNet
 Subject: Re: Web Development



 Hi Simon, perhaps if you passed one of those MS ASP.NET exams it may help?



 Maybe this one? 70-515: Web Applications Development with Microsoft .NET
 Framework 4 http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/exam.aspx?ID=70-515

 On 10 August 2011 13:02, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
 wrote:

 Cheers for the feedback… I guess I just have to continue on with my home
 attempts at building a website via ASP MVC 3…



 From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
 On Behalf Of William Luu
 Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:48 PM
 To: ozDotNet
 Subject: Re: Web Development



 Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does mean it
 may be a little more difficult to get through the door for the first
 interview compared with someone else who has the same amount of .NET
 experience as yourself, but as an ASP.NET dev.



 That said, it also depends on what the company that is hiring is after.
 I'm sure there are many companies out there that are actively searching for
 good .NET developers and would happily give you a go.

 On 10 August 2011 12:26, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
 wrote:

 I meant *un*employable



 From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
 On Behalf Of Simon Kuldin
 Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
 To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
 Subject: Web Development



 Hey there everyone,



 It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there,
 require a decent level of ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean I’m pretty
 much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET experience, despite my
 level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact Framework development?



 I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don’t have any real work experience
 with it yet.



 I feel like I’m fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a full-time
 Dot Net development role (I’m only doing Dot Net development as a portion of
 my job at the moment).












RE: Web Development

2011-08-09 Thread Simon Kuldin
I meant *un*employable

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Simon Kuldin
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
Subject: Web Development

 

Hey there everyone,

 

It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there,
require a decent level of ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean I'm pretty
much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET experience, despite my
level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact Framework development?

 

I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don't have any real work experience
with it yet.

 

I feel like I'm fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a full-time
Dot Net development role (I'm only doing Dot Net development as a portion of
my job at the moment).



Re: Web Development

2011-08-09 Thread Nathan Schultz
I would advocate doing your own project or an open source project in your
spare time - just so you have something to put on your CV.

While there are some aspects of development from winforms development that
can be transferred over (such as general .Net knowledge), it will still take
some time to become proficient in ASP.Net (and web development in general).

Years ago I started off doing purely WinForms, and my first couple of
ASP.Net projects were... well... not fantastic.


On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Simon Kuldin 
sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:

 I meant **un**employable

 ** **

 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Simon Kuldin
 *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
 *To:* ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
 *Subject:* Web Development

 ** **

 Hey there everyone,

 ** **

 It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there,
 require a decent level of ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean I’m pretty
 much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET experience, despite my
 level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact Framework development?
 

 ** **

 I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don’t have any real work experience
 with it yet.

 ** **

 I feel like I’m fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a full-time
 Dot Net development role (I’m only doing Dot Net development as a portion of
 my job at the moment).



Re: Web Development

2011-08-09 Thread William Luu
Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does mean it
may be a little more difficult to get through the door for the first
interview compared with someone else who has the same amount of .NET
experience as yourself, but as an ASP.NET dev.

That said, it also depends on what the company that is hiring is after. I'm
sure there are many companies out there that are actively searching for good
.NET developers and would happily give you a go.

On 10 August 2011 12:26, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:

 I meant **un**employable

 ** **

 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Simon Kuldin
 *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
 *To:* ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
 *Subject:* Web Development

 ** **

 Hey there everyone,

 ** **

 It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there,
 require a decent level of ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean I’m pretty
 much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET experience, despite my
 level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact Framework development?
 

 ** **

 I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don’t have any real work experience
 with it yet.

 ** **

 I feel like I’m fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a full-time
 Dot Net development role (I’m only doing Dot Net development as a portion of
 my job at the moment).



Re: Web Development

2011-08-09 Thread mike smith
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Nathan Schultz milish...@gmail.comwrote:

 I would advocate doing your own project or an open source project in your
 spare time - just so you have something to put on your CV.

 While there are some aspects of development from winforms development that
 can be transferred over (such as general .Net knowledge), it will still take
 some time to become proficient in ASP.Net (and web development in general).

 Years ago I started off doing purely WinForms, and my first couple of
 ASP.Net projects were... well... not fantastic.



You think you're alone in that?  :^)   Looking at my first projects, I wish
I'd included a facility to remotely upgrade them.


-- 
Meski

 http://courteous.ly/aAOZcv

Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure, you'll
get it, but it's going to be rough - Adam Hills


RE: Web Development

2011-08-09 Thread Simon Kuldin
Cheers for the feedback. I guess I just have to continue on with my home
attempts at building a website via ASP MVC 3. 

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of William Luu
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:48 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Web Development

 

Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does mean it
may be a little more difficult to get through the door for the first
interview compared with someone else who has the same amount of .NET
experience as yourself, but as an ASP.NET dev.

 

That said, it also depends on what the company that is hiring is after. I'm
sure there are many companies out there that are actively searching for good
.NET developers and would happily give you a go.

On 10 August 2011 12:26, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:

I meant *un*employable

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Simon Kuldin
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
Subject: Web Development

 

Hey there everyone,

 

It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there,
require a decent level of ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean I'm pretty
much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET experience, despite my
level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact Framework development?

 

I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don't have any real work experience
with it yet.

 

I feel like I'm fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a full-time
Dot Net development role (I'm only doing Dot Net development as a portion of
my job at the moment).

 



Re: Web Development

2011-08-09 Thread Winston Pang
Simon, as others said, it's not all doom and gloom, some employers might
push you down on salary, or some wouldn't mind, or you can go into another
company that does WinForms as a prime and ASP.NET in addition, so you can
learn as you go.

Do not feel pressured to rush and cram yourself with contents and tutorial,
like say, either join open source, or think of writing a web app that can
solve a problem or a need you may have, like managing your own data, etc, Or
look at building a web-app that's done to death, or maybe you can write a
blog in it, that will expose you to a lot of aspects, you can even think
about porting some WinForms apps you've written in the past to it as well as
a good learning exercise.

Ultimately, pace yourself, or you'll have information overload and feel
stressed and pressured.

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
 wrote:

 Cheers for the feedback… I guess I just have to continue on with my home
 attempts at building a website via ASP MVC 3… 

 ** **

 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *William Luu
 *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:48 PM
 *To:* ozDotNet
 *Subject:* Re: Web Development

 ** **

 Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does mean it
 may be a little more difficult to get through the door for the first
 interview compared with someone else who has the same amount of .NET
 experience as yourself, but as an ASP.NET dev.

 ** **

 That said, it also depends on what the company that is hiring is after. I'm
 sure there are many companies out there that are actively searching for good
 .NET developers and would happily give you a go.

 On 10 August 2011 12:26, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
 wrote:

 I meant **un**employable

  

 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Simon Kuldin
 *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
 *To:* ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
 *Subject:* Web Development

  

 Hey there everyone,

  

 It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there,
 require a decent level of ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean I’m pretty
 much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET experience, despite my
 level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact Framework development?
 

  

 I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don’t have any real work experience
 with it yet.

  

 I feel like I’m fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a full-time
 Dot Net development role (I’m only doing Dot Net development as a portion of
 my job at the moment).

 ** **



Re: Web Development

2011-08-09 Thread William Luu
Hi Simon, perhaps if you passed one of those MS ASP.NET exams it may help?

Maybe this one? 70-515: Web Applications Development with Microsoft .NET
Framework 4 http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/exam.aspx?ID=70-515

On 10 August 2011 13:02, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:

 Cheers for the feedback… I guess I just have to continue on with my home
 attempts at building a website via ASP MVC 3… 

 ** **

 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *William Luu
 *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:48 PM
 *To:* ozDotNet
 *Subject:* Re: Web Development

 ** **

 Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does mean it
 may be a little more difficult to get through the door for the first
 interview compared with someone else who has the same amount of .NET
 experience as yourself, but as an ASP.NET dev.

 ** **

 That said, it also depends on what the company that is hiring is after. I'm
 sure there are many companies out there that are actively searching for good
 .NET developers and would happily give you a go.

 On 10 August 2011 12:26, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
 wrote:

 I meant **un**employable

  

 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Simon Kuldin
 *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
 *To:* ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
 *Subject:* Web Development

  

 Hey there everyone,

  

 It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there,
 require a decent level of ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean I’m pretty
 much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET experience, despite my
 level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact Framework development?
 

  

 I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don’t have any real work experience
 with it yet.

  

 I feel like I’m fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a full-time
 Dot Net development role (I’m only doing Dot Net development as a portion of
 my job at the moment).

 ** **



RE: Web Development

2011-08-09 Thread Simon Kuldin
Hi William,

 

Thanks.. maybe I'll have a go at the exam once I've done enough study via
the pluralsight website.  That being said, I probably should have started
with WebForms rather than MVC, but I'm already curious with MVC now.

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of William Luu
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 1:10 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Web Development

 

Hi Simon, perhaps if you passed one of those MS ASP.NET exams it may help?

 

Maybe this one? 70-515: Web Applications Development with Microsoft .NET
Framework 4 http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/exam.aspx?ID=70-515

On 10 August 2011 13:02, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:

Cheers for the feedback. I guess I just have to continue on with my home
attempts at building a website via ASP MVC 3. 

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of William Luu
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:48 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Web Development

 

Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does mean it
may be a little more difficult to get through the door for the first
interview compared with someone else who has the same amount of .NET
experience as yourself, but as an ASP.NET dev.

 

That said, it also depends on what the company that is hiring is after. I'm
sure there are many companies out there that are actively searching for good
.NET developers and would happily give you a go.

On 10 August 2011 12:26, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:

I meant *un*employable

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Simon Kuldin
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
Subject: Web Development

 

Hey there everyone,

 

It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there,
require a decent level of ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean I'm pretty
much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET experience, despite my
level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact Framework development?

 

I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don't have any real work experience
with it yet.

 

I feel like I'm fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a full-time
Dot Net development role (I'm only doing Dot Net development as a portion of
my job at the moment).

 

 



RE: Web Development

2011-08-09 Thread Greg Low (GregLow.com)
Also, while doing that, make sure you spend quite a bit of time looking at
other people's code. The mindset needed is quite different.

 

Regards,

 

Greg

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Nathan Schultz
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:42 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Web Development

 

I would advocate doing your own project or an open source project in your
spare time - just so you have something to put on your CV. 

While there are some aspects of development from winforms development that
can be transferred over (such as general .Net knowledge), it will still take
some time to become proficient in ASP.Net (and web development in general).

Years ago I started off doing purely WinForms, and my first couple of
ASP.Net projects were... well... not fantastic.



On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Simon Kuldin
sim...@prism-solutions.com.au wrote:

I meant *un*employable

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Simon Kuldin
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
Subject: Web Development

 

Hey there everyone,

 

It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there,
require a decent level of ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean I'm pretty
much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET experience, despite my
level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact Framework development?

 

I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don't have any real work experience
with it yet.

 

I feel like I'm fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a full-time
Dot Net development role (I'm only doing Dot Net development as a portion of
my job at the moment).

 



Re: Web Development

2011-08-09 Thread Michael Ridland
Hi

Smart Employers look for someone who's smart, can learn and gets things
done. I would take on someone based on that not what specific platform
knowledge they had.

It's great to learn MVC first. Learning WebForms will teach you the wrong
way to do web development.

ps, where are you based? can you send me your CV I might know someone
interested?

Thanks,

*Michael Ridland | ThinkSmart Digital*
Managing Director
P. 0404 865 350
E. mich...@thinksmartdigital.com.au
W. www.thinksmartdigital.com.au
T. www.twitter.com/rid00z
L. au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland



On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
 wrote:

 Hi William,

 ** **

 Thanks.. maybe I’ll have a go at the exam once I’ve done enough study via
 the pluralsight website.  That being said, I probably should have started
 with WebForms rather than MVC, but I’m already curious with MVC now.

 ** **

 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *William Luu
 *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 August 2011 1:10 PM

 *To:* ozDotNet
 *Subject:* Re: Web Development

 ** **

 Hi Simon, perhaps if you passed one of those MS ASP.NET exams it may help?
 

 ** **

 Maybe this one? 70-515: Web Applications Development with Microsoft .NET
 Framework 4 http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/exam.aspx?ID=70-515**
 **

 On 10 August 2011 13:02, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
 wrote:

 Cheers for the feedback… I guess I just have to continue on with my home
 attempts at building a website via ASP MVC 3… 

  

 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *William Luu
 *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:48 PM
 *To:* ozDotNet
 *Subject:* Re: Web Development

  

 Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does mean it
 may be a little more difficult to get through the door for the first
 interview compared with someone else who has the same amount of .NET
 experience as yourself, but as an ASP.NET dev.

  

 That said, it also depends on what the company that is hiring is after. I'm
 sure there are many companies out there that are actively searching for good
 .NET developers and would happily give you a go.

 On 10 August 2011 12:26, Simon Kuldin sim...@prism-solutions.com.au
 wrote:

 I meant **un**employable

  

 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Simon Kuldin
 *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM
 *To:* ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
 *Subject:* Web Development

  

 Hey there everyone,

  

 It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there,
 require a decent level of ASP.NET experience.  Does that mean I’m pretty
 much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET experience, despite my
 level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact Framework development?
 

  

 I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don’t have any real work experience
 with it yet.

  

 I feel like I’m fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a full-time
 Dot Net development role (I’m only doing Dot Net development as a portion of
 my job at the moment).

  

 ** **






 http://au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland