[ozmidwifery] routine vag exams

2006-09-15 Thread Mary Murphy








I did google this and cut and paste a heap of quotes.  Then
I lost it!.  You could google it yourself and see what comes up. You could also
follow up on Mary Stewarts research.  MM

 

hsc.uwe.ac.uk/net/research/Default.aspx?pageindex=7&pageid=259

Vaginal
examination in labour: power, control and decision making 







Funding
body: Faculty of Health & Social Care

Contact:
Mary Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Vaginal
examination is a common procedure, undertaken by midwives and obstetricians in
order to assess progress in labour. Despite its routine nature, little
attention has been paid to the experiences of those undergoing or performing
the vaginal examination. In particular, no research has been carried out to
explore who has power and control over decision-making about the procedure.
There are three research questions that will be addressed. These are:

1. Who
has power and control over decision-making about vaginal examination in labour?
2. In what ways does current practice reflect issues of power, control and
decision-making?
3. What influences midwives’ and obstetricians’ decision-making
regarding vaginal examination

An
ethnographic approach is being used, integrating narrative enquiry. The
research design will be underpinned by feminist principles in that the research
attempts to map and explore women’s experiences and address issues of
power, autonomy and control. Data are being collected through the use of
observation in the field, and interviews with midwives, obstetricians and women
whose labours have been observed. In addition, field diary and reflexive
diaries are being used. Analysis of data will include thematic content,
analytical memos and the use of computer software. A narrative approach is
being used for data analysis, identifying narrative sequences within the text
and using the method of analysis put forward by Catherine Riessman. 

Data
collection began in June 2003 and
will continue for several more months. However, several themes are already
emerging. One of these involves the decisions midwives make about whether a
vaginal examination will be overt, in which case it is documented in the
clinical records, or whether it is ‘hidden’ and never formally
acknowledged. Further themes are being developed using concept of mapping and
this will continue throughout the research process. 

 








RE: [ozmidwifery] VBAC after more than one c-sec in the perinatal data?

2006-09-15 Thread Mary Murphy








Same as the WA form.  Contact the state
Health statistics dept.  they have all the data.  MM

 









From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of brendamanning
Sent: Saturday, 16 September 2006
1:12 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC
after more than one c-sec in the perinatal data?



 



Hi Janet,





 On the Victorian perinatal data
collection unit form which should be filled out & returned
by all midwives to the above unit for every birth (home or otherwise)
there is a section which asks:





No 41:"was the last birth a CS
?





No  42: Total no of previous CS?





 





Is this what you mean ?





 





I have recently been midwife at 
VBAC after 3CS and a VBAC following 2 CS.





So they are happening. Just need more of
them.





 





AS 1 OB
colleague states:





 "if we could just prevent the
first CS happening she wouldn't be faced with this awful dilemma now ie to
VBAC or not.





 





With kind regards
Brenda Manning 
www.themidwife.com.au







- Original Message - 





From: Janet
Fraser 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Saturday,
September 16, 2006 1:30 PM





Subject: [ozmidwifery] VBAC
after more than one c-sec in the perinatal data?





 





Hi all,





is there some
way in which the perinatal data for each state records vb after multiple c-secs
in the hospy system? I wonder if it's too statistically insignificant or is
there a part of the data I haven't noticed. I know they're different in each
state as well. How about hospy's own data? Are people recording how many c-secs
women have before a vb? We really need MIPPs to be recording HBACs so we can
contrast that with the truly appalling national average. I've only seen
blanket VBAC figures, not how many surgeries prior. Anyone know?





J





For home birth
information go to:
Joyous Birth 
Australian home birth network and forums.
http://www.joyousbirth.info/
Or email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]












Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC after more than one c-sec in the perinatal data?

2006-09-15 Thread Mike & Lindsay Kennedy
Pretty simple for QLD as a women is not offered a Vbac if she has had more than 1 C/S even if she has had a successful vaginal birth between the c/s's. Don't know about the private system but they appear do more c/s and less vbac than the public system so probably less than no chance with them.
On 9/16/06, Janet Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:







Hi all,
is there some way in which the 
perinatal data for each state records vb after multiple c-secs in the hospy 
system? I wonder if it's too statistically insignificant or is there a part of 
the data I haven't noticed. I know they're different in each state as well. How 
about hospy's own data? Are people recording how many c-secs women have before a 
vb? We really need MIPPs to be recording HBACs so we can contrast that with the 
truly appalling national average. I've only seen blanket VBAC figures, not 
how many surgeries prior. Anyone know?
J
For home birth information go 
to:Joyous Birth Australian home birth network and forums.http://www.joyousbirth.info/Or 
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nzMy Group online @ 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_PhotographersNew Photo site@Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.comLindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com
"Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is as safe as it gets." Unknown


[ozmidwifery] Hear Pinky podcast

2006-09-15 Thread Barbara Glare & Chris Bright



Hi,
 
Hear Pinky McKay podcast at http://www.lrc.asn.au/podcast/podcast.html
 
ABA's first venture into the world of 
podcast!
 
Barb
Barb GlareMum of Zac, 12, Daniel, 10, Cassie 7 
& Guan 3Counsellor, Warrnambool Vic[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
**
 
Ph (03) 5565 8602Director, Australian 
Breastfeeding AssociationMothers Directwww.mothersdirect.com.au


[ozmidwifery] MSNBC.com Article: More infant deaths with elective C-sections

2006-09-15 Thread Heartlogic



 More infant deaths with elective C-sectionsA new study has 
found a higher risk of infant deaths among infants born by Caesarean section to 
mothers who have no medical need for the procedure.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14838765/from/ET/


RE: [ozmidwifery] mec staining

2006-09-15 Thread Tania Smallwood








I’ve been at two births at home
where it has become clear close to the time of birth that there is thick mec. 
Both babies born with no problems at all, neither had a dicky heartrate at any
time.  The two emerg transfers to hospital I’ve done in 4 ½ years, have
been with a baby with severe and sudden onset of deep decels, neither had any
mec at all.  I think the stats say that up to 40% (correct me if I’m
wrong) of all post term babies have mec stained liquor, that’s not the
case in my experience, both the babies with mec were either a bit early or on
time…and of all the post-dates pregnancies, including my own, it hasn’t
been a feature.  I agree with Sally, that the timing and type of mec is
important to note, and also I think it pays to see it is one of many cues that
may mean something, and to be on the alert for any other signs of distress, or
it may mean nothing sinister at all…just that the baby has a patent anus!

 

Tania

 

 









From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Sally @ home
Sent: Friday, 15 September 2006
5:24 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] mec
staining



 



The research now states that suctioning of babies with mec
stained liquor actually makes no difference to outcome. Mec stained liquor
really is quite common...the most important aspect I think is whether it is
fresh/thick/particulate. Or old/thin. This can happen with/without fetal
distress.





 





Sally







- Original Message - 





From: Kristin
Beckedahl 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Friday, September
15, 2006 4:21 PM





Subject: [ozmidwifery] mec
staining





 





Hi
all,

Are
all cases of mec liquor staining considered serious or treated as an
emergency?  Can you have staining and fetal heart rate be OK?

Thanks,

Kristin



-- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit to
subscribe or unsubscribe. 







No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.0.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.4/448 - Release Date: 14/09/2006










--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.4/448 - Release Date: 14/09/2006
 

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.4/448 - Release Date: 14/09/2006
 


Re: [ozmidwifery] mec staining

2006-09-15 Thread Andrea Quanchi
Meconium staining of the liquor in itself is not an emergency. It is an indication that at some time the baby may not have been happy.  Spontaneous emptying of the bowel contents happens in babies for two reasons, one when they are stressed or upset (hence where the saying  sh*tt*ng themselves comes from) and the other because the bowel is simply too full and overflows so to speak. The latter is quite common in babies who have stayed in utero past the estimated day of birth.Meconium is a concern if there are fresh lumps of it floating around and they get into the airway prior to birth and the baby inhales them when it tries to breathe. The presence of fresh meconium is an indication for suctining of the airways ASAP. Meconium staining on the other hand indicates that the baby has passed meconium some time ago and we often have no way of knowing what the incident was that caused it to do so.  If the liquor is uniformly stained then it happened long enough ago that the meconium has 'disolved' in the liquor.  Meconium liquor is just one part of a bigger picture that needs to be considered and is no longer considered to be a reason for routine suctioning at birth.I fully realise that this is not the impression that parents get by the reaction of many of those looking after them that make out as if it is a dire emergency. AndreaOn 15/09/2006, at 4:21 PM, Kristin Beckedahl wrote:Hi all,Are all cases of mec liquor staining considered serious or treated as an emergency?  Can you have staining and fetal heart rate be OK?Thanks,Kristin -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit  to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Re: [ozmidwifery] mec staining

2006-09-15 Thread Sally @ home



The research now states that suctioning of babies 
with mec stained liquor actually makes no difference to outcome. Mec stained 
liquor really is quite common...the most important aspect I think is whether it 
is fresh/thick/particulate. Or old/thin. This can happen with/without fetal 
distress.
 
Sally

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kristin 
  Beckedahl 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 4:21 
  PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] mec staining
  
  
  Hi all,
  Are all cases of mec liquor staining 
  considered serious or treated as an emergency?  Can you have staining and 
  fetal heart rate be OK?
  Thanks,
  Kristin-- 
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit to subscribe or unsubscribe.
  
  

  No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free 
  Edition.Version: 7.0.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.4/448 - Release Date: 
  14/09/2006