Re: [ozmidwifery] belly dancing midwives:)

2006-01-03 Thread Meaghan Moon

Hi Julie,
I have been doing Pilates for a couple of years now and really find it 
makes a difference in my abilities to sustain midwifery work.  I had lots 
of SI problems resulting from having kids and carrying them around on my 
hip (they were little fatties).  I have far fewer problems now and most of 
all I just love doing a healthy activity that is for ME.  Once you hit 
intermediate level you will find it to be a workout that gets you 
sweating.  I have done a little bit of belly dancing previously and now 
have the opportunity to do  it the same night as Pilates class.  It will be 
my Monday Hard Core night!  I find the Pilates work  relates very well to 
childbearing as well.  You will strengthen your pelvic floor and be able to 
encourage Mums to learn and do simple exercises to help them in pregnancy 
and after.  Pilates is worth it I think.


Meaghan


At 05:58 PM 1/3/06, you wrote:

Hi all,
I've just started work as a midwife and I think I need some exercise to 
strengthen my back, feeling a bit stiff after catching babies in the 
shower, bath, floor, birth stool ect. I think it is a sustainability issue 
of practice, a good strong back. I don't ever want my physical ability to 
dictate how a woman wants to birth. Anyone tried pilates or belly dancing? 
Any other good suggestions?

Ta Julie:)



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] 3rd degree tears

2005-08-30 Thread Meaghan Moon
Funny you should ask that right now.  We have two mum's in care with 
previous 4th degree tears.
( One of these happened a couple of years ago while under my care - as 
prime with large baby but no other concerns, just happened. I had two in 
one week and am hoping I will never see another.  She also  broke her 
coccyx  during that birth.  What a loud crack it made!!!)


Anyway, both mum's in care now are having some fecal incontinence, which 
has started during third trimester : (.  The one that happened under my 
care was referred for physio after the birth which she went to for 6 weeks 
but has not been religious about doing exercises since.  Physio says she 
has some muscle strength there.  Mum is working hard at her diet to reduce 
excess sugars/carbs to keep babe handleable size, which seems to be working.


We (midwives) have had some hemming and hawing about the possibility of 
episiotomies with repairs at the time of birth, but seem to have decided 
against this.  The midwives would like to see them both attempt vaginal 
birth without epis (haven't seen any evidence that epis would be 
beneficial), see how they recover after birth and refer to  an appropriate 
surgeon (not obs/gyne) in a larger centre for assessment and subsequent 
repair if necessary. Of course, if a 4th happens again they will need to be 
repaired on site and then referred later.  Discussions with mums about this 
as potential plan is to occur yet.  Both have requested consult to obs 
(different docs) and we are waiting for responses - mums and midwives will 
be unhappy if cesarean is suggested.


 In the research I have done so far, it seems it is not just previously 
torn muscles that contribute to incontinence.  Pudendal nerve damage could 
be the etiology.  This would require different treatment than surgical 
reconstruction, so assuming that one could cut and then fix at next birth 
does not seem logical or humane.  I am hoping both mums will have faith in 
their bodies abilities to have healed well and that they will have less 
trouble this time.  Any other ideas out there?


Meaghan, in Canada


At 06:18 PM 8/29/05, you wrote:
Out of curiosity.. does anyone have any experiences of vaginal birth 
following previous 4th degree tear?  I've just recently met a woman who 
wants to give vaginal birth a go - has new partner (says old one was 
huge!).  She is smallish person - 60kg, last babe 10lbs (1st baby).  What 
do you think.  She will be birthing in hospital.  I've asked her to get a 
copy of her obstetric records from previous hospital.  Still in early 
pregnancy so can't gauge size yet.  Is a later ultrasound a good idea for 
a gestimate on the weight?  I know they can be so inaccurate.


Kiwi Kim,

---Original Message---

From: mailto:ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Date: 29/08/2005 11:10:23 a.m.
To: mailto:ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] 3rd degree tears

Hi,
I've just returned from a clinical placement in SA where I spent a 
mindblowing three hours in an incontinence clinic in an outpatients unit 
at a major hospital.
The mindblowing element was the following statistics (copied from one of 
the handouts):

   * 39-49% women tear or have an episiotomy needing sutures
   * 0.5 - 2.5% have a 3rd or 4th degree tear after vaginal childbirth 
that is visible
   * 25-35% after first vaginal delivery have a concealed or closed 3rd 
degree tear, not visible

Listed as contributing factors were:
   * 1st vaginal birth
   * forceps/instrumental delivery
   * long second stage  1 hour
   * big baby4kgs
   * tissue type, short perineum, epidural, uncontrolled pushing, rapid 
delivery, midline tear or episiotomy


The nurse practitioner stated this was all evidence-based information and 
recommended c/sections to women who had had previous 3rd degree repairs - 
these were the ones who knew about their tears obviously.
The handouts do not give references and as yet I have not had time to 
begin researching.


Are you all as mindblown as I am??
What do you think - are 1/4 - 1/3 of us walking around with damaged anal 
sphincters and not aware of it??
Where does this sort of information lead us - if our bodies are so inept 
at giving birth then all first babies and subsequently all babies should 
be born by c/section.


Sue

http://www.incredimail.com/index.asp?id=54475
Add FUN to your email - CLICK HERE!




--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] pelvic floor / incontinence

2005-08-29 Thread Meaghan Moon
Pilates is great for ab/back and pelvic floor strengthening!  Have any of 
you been to a Feldenkrais Pelvic Power workshop?  I highly recommend 
it.  You may be able to find more info by searching the internet for either 
Pelvic Power or Feldenkrais.  I have a friend in Brisbane who teaches 
it.  It should be compulsory for all women!!!


Meaghan


At 07:24 AM 8/29/05, you wrote:
Hi - I have recently returned to the list after several years absence.  I 
am interested in the discussion sparked by Sue following her visit to the 
incontinence clinic.  I have had some conversations recently with a physio 
who specialises in pilates and has a specific interest in pelvic floor 
function.  I had assumed that the increase in incontinence pad advertising 
was aimed at an older or elderly age group but apparently she is seeing a 
significant portion of her practice being young (seemingly) fit women 
after their first babies who are suffering from incontinence. She feels 
that this is a problem that has been hidden or taken as normal by women 
and perhaps as a normal consequence of childbirth.  I bought a booklet 
called Women's Waterworks by Dr Pauline Chiarelli which quotes that36% of 
women over 45 suffer incontinence and apparently 60%of all nursing home 
admissions are due to incontinence.  This little booklet is aimed at 
teaching women how to regain bladder control and goes  into detail about 
the role of hormones and various muscle groups in the contraction of the 
bladder and pelvic floor.  I found it well written and informative.
Anyway my take on the whole issue is that the majority of people are now 
very sedentary compared to our previous history and also use furniture and 
sitting toilets.  I don't think these things can be good for your pelvic 
floor.  I don't believe forceps or epidurals or instructed pushing can be 
good either.  I think it probably takes much more effort to keep this part 
of our body healthy in this age of TV and couches than most of us realise 
and so the consequence is that it becomes weak following the physical, 
hormonal and neurological changes following childbirth.  I am thinking now 
that perhaps are you doing your pelvic floor exercises? needs to be an 
issue that I spend a lot more time on in education and follow-up.

Maxine



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] sounds during labour/birth

2005-08-14 Thread Meaghan Moon
I am very late in on this thread and haven't read all of the e-mails on the 
topic.  I like mooing.  In Canada, I talk to mums about bellowing like a 
moose.  Roaring is also good.  Had a mum recently who was a real roarer, 
and in fact explained to her 5 year old that she was having a good time 
roaring just like a lion, so it was all O.K.  He seemed to be reassured by 
this, even though we had heard him fall out of bed when he was woken by her 
belly roars!


Meaghan

At 10:21 PM 8/13/05, you wrote:

Dear Andrea and Miriam

I love your emails and am mooing myself happily
Again it shows the wonderfull instintcs women have

I have not been with women who have mooed but from my time with homebirth 
midwives and then clients and also in my singing for non singers course


I learnt that deep noises rather than high pitch ones (screams0  are the 
ones to encourage as they send the energy down into your abdomen and then 
to the uterus and baby


whereas the high pitched  looses energy out of the body through the head

Mooing is a low pitch noise!!

Where I did my mid in the UK the maternity unit was out the back of the 
hospital and overlooked pastures with cows and I remember saying to the 
women we humans need to reconnenct with nature to nurture and now birth 
our young!!


Denise Hynd

Let us support one another, not just in philosophy but in action, for the 
sake of freedom for all women to choose exactly how and by whom, if by 
anyone, our bodies will be handled.


- Linda Hes

- Original Message - From: Tania Smallwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 3:03 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] sounds during labour/birth



Sorry for the late input on this, have been cruising the South Pacific with
my family, but am catching up on many emails now...don't feel too sorry for
me!

Ah Miriam, you have such a way with words!  I too was beckoned as a student
midwife only a few years ago to join in and feel the love with a woman who
could only be described as mooing, and it was a very connecting experience
for us both.  It also meant that the supervising midwife, who was obviously
not at all comfortable with birthing noises (funny that, how she was very
comfortable with cleaning noises, people barging in to look at charts
noises...) kept her distance and just let 'us'go for it!

I myself moaned and groaned and then growled my way through 18 hours of
labour first time around, and there are shadows of the school kids walking
past the bathroom window on the video just before Sam is born! I still
wonder why no-one knocked on the front door to see what was going on in
there!

A friend who has recently had her first homebirth after several hospital
births has commented on how she thought she was a quiet birther, but then
after birthing at home, realized that she did indeed feel restricted in the
hospital, and that she now thinks that she was aware of feeling like her
midwives would judge her if she was too vocal in the hospital. Interesting
stuff.

Tania
x



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.8/71 - Release Date: 12/08/2005



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.




--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Problems With new Models

2005-06-14 Thread Meaghan Moon
I agree with Mary that 60 women per month is not feasible as a caseload.  I 
am also experienced working in this model.  Here in Manitoba we are 
expected to carry at least 30 women per year.  This lower number was set to 
compensate for the fact that we are to target women who might most 
benefit from care.  These women often have higher psychosocial needs.  I 
too much prefer knowing women and feel less stressed about being called out 
for known women who I expect to follow through the whole childbearing 
experience.  However, in our situation as primary care providers, we may be 
called out more than just for births.  We are often paged to respond to 
decreased fetal movement, bleeding, abdominal pain - the list goes on and 
on.  So it is important to remember that you may not just be called for 
births but for a myriad of other issues that need to be triaged or  dealt 
with right away.


Meaghan in Canada

At 04:07 AM 6/14/05, you wrote:
60 women is not feasible at all!  As an experienced caseloader that 
would take an enormous effort and would not be sustainable. A midwife on 
another list who has also been discussing this theme wrote:
  Part of the reason for burn out however, is due to hospital 
managements putting undue institutional requirements on the midwives - 
making them come in to do shift work when they do not have a birth due, 
etc. Because of the nature of the work midwives need to be able to 
schedule their own appointments and take care of their own work in their 
own time if caseload is to be effective and successful. Therefore it 
requires full cooperation and support of administration and management.
This freedom to work at ones own pace and to schedule work when it suits 
the midwife is imperative to the success of the model.  If one has 4 women 
per month, then one can only be called out  4 times/month. If one month 
has 5, then the other month will only have 3.  Caroline Flints work is 
brilliant in explaining this.  She advises to schedule all ones own 
important dates in and then work around that.  It works for many of 
us.  Cheers, MM


I am wondering how feasible a caseload is 60 women? This seems like a 
large number and may be one of the reasons why staff are not feeling up to 
the task. Would 40 primary women and 40 shared women not be a more doable 
workload? I know this has financial implications but down-sizing the model 
may increase its longevity. Additionally UK literature states that greater 
autonomy leads to greater job satisfaction. So I agree with Andrea's 
posting - which basically translates to midwives having greater control 
over their practice and time allocation.





--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC and todays thought

2005-02-19 Thread Meaghan Moon
Great thought, Mary.
I just helped a mum through birth with a VBAC.  She is 4'11'', very 
increased BMI (225lbs). First baby 6lb 5oz, cesarean for FTP as babe 
posterior with head deflexed. She was rehospitalized postpartum for 
infection at the incision site which I felt was likely superficial due to 
her size.

 I consulted as required by our hospital admitting privileges, and she was 
advised not to attempt TOL.  Another physician actually laughed at her 
when she to her of her plan to birth vaginally with the physician asking 
who is the brave soul that is going to let you do that?  She spent many 
visits in my ofice in tears.  Even my midwifery colleagues were doubtful 
about the wisdom of letting her try.  I lost my temper with them over it 
in the week before her birth, accusing them of being fatphobic.

She went into labour spontaneously, walking into the clinic at 7 cms asking 
if she was really in labour.  Went on to birth a 7lb 1oz baby 5 hours later 
with only about 40 mins of pushing.  No problems, great recovery.  I am 
going to pass on this quote to her, although we have discussed the concept 
already.

Meaghan (in Canada)
At 02:49 AM 2/15/05, you wrote:
Thought for the Day: Do just once what others say you can't do, and you 
will never pay attention to their limitations again.  James R. Cook

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] helpful tip

2005-01-08 Thread Meaghan Moon
The position sounds a lot like exaggerated Sims, with some 
pressure/manipulation used to exaggerate it even more.  I have used this 
and had a 10 and half pound persistant direct posterior born almost 
immediately after using it. with the same look of surprise (on 
everyone's faces!) described in the tip.

Meaghan Moon
At 06:38 PM 1/7/05, you wrote:
I read this too in the Midwifery Today forum.  For the
life of me, I can't get a picture in my head of what
this manipulation might look like!  Have any of you
tried this or somethingsimilar before?
Jen
 --- Mary Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The Art of Midwifery
 To turn a posterior baby: Have the woman lie on her
 left side with her left leg straight down and in
 line with her body and her right leg raised and
 brought up toward her face, head curled down toward
 knee. [I am short so having her place her knee on my
 shoulder is the right height and position.] During a
 contraction, push down and back on bottom leg and up
 and abducted with top leg. That seems to open pelvis
 and allows baby to turn with the contraction. I
 usually see a funny look on mom's face, and baby is
 on perineum immediately.

 - Claudia Toms
 Midwifery Today Forums
 www.midwiferytoday.com/forums/

Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
http://au.movies.yahoo.com
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] thanks

2004-05-29 Thread Meaghan Moon
Hi Sheena,
I am a midwife practicing in Canada.  I always chart cord around the neck 
as nuchal cord.  Nuchal means pertaining to the neck.  I had an 
interesting tight nuchal cord the other day.  I used the somersault 
maneuver to get the baby out without cutting the cord.  This is described 
in Varney's Midwifery. I  have used it a few times and find that it works 
great.  Babies don't seem to be so stunned  or need resuscitation, the 
way they do if the cord is cut on the perineum.

Here is how to do it.  If you have checked for cord and you asses that it 
is tight and impeding the birth, wait for restitution then flex baby's head 
tightly toward the (mum's) thigh that it is facing (think tucking chin/head 
to do somersault).  Babe will generally come with next push and literally 
somersault out so that head stays at perineum with body flipping 
over.  Unravel cord from neck and stimulate babe if needed.  I find they 
often do need added (gentl) stimulation with a tight cord, and maybe a bit 
more encouragement to cry well. When the cord is tight the natural 
expulsion of fluid that usually occurs as the head is born is 
restricted  because of the tight cord.  They tend to be a bit more gurgly 
and may need a good cry to clear the lungs well.

The babe I somersaulted the other day (Apgars 7 and 9), had the cord tight 
around the neck under the arms and around the body.  He never did really 
cry and pinked up well in mum's arms.  He still doesn't cry much and slept 
through the Guthrie heel poke today.  He is feeding well, gaining weight 
and just mellow.

Meaghan Moon
At 08:00 AM 5/28/04, you wrote:
Thank you to all who replied about the cord around the neck query of mine. 
Now I have another question, why is it sometimes called the nuchal cord? I 
have heard of the nuchal fold, but only very occasionally is  the term 
nuchal cord used.

Sheena Johnson

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] blood glucose testing

2002-09-21 Thread Meaghan Moon

Hi Jo,
Have you seen the WHO paper Hypoglycemia of the Newborn ? (I think that 
is the name of it and I think can be found on the WHO website). Very 
helpful for establishing guidelines around blood glucose testing and treatment.

Meaghan Moon
Brandon, Manitoba, Canada

At 11:54 AM 9/18/02 +1000, you wrote:
I'm sure you guys will be sick of me by now, but bad stuff just keeps 
happening when I'm around...

A large baby was born: 4.590kg.  Policy says the baby should have a BSL 
done because he was 'at risk' due to his size.

BSL came back at 1.7mmol.  Anything under 2.5 is unacceptable, and must be 
follwed by a TBG (True Blood Glucose) which is sent to the pathology lab 
for an accurate result.  This often requires the baby to be pricked twice, 
as the BSL machine is just the same as those adult finger prick ones, and 
not enough blood for a TBG can usually be extracted.  So if the BSL result 
comes back too low, a larger lancet (same as for a NST) is used to get a 
small vial of blood.

  Policy also says that you are not to wait for the TBG result before 
 acting on the BSL result.  So, this exclusively breast fed baby was given 
 formula.  Mum was consulted (after I told the midwife from SCN that of 
 course you have to ask her first!) and reluctantly said, If he has to 
 then I guess he has to... but can I still breast feed him?  So the baby 
 was given formula.  (NO idea why not breast... I think because 'he is 
 such a big boy and colostrum isn't enough for him'.)

A little while after the formula was given, the result of the TBG came 
back as 3.6mmol.  I couldn't believe it... this baby was given formula FOR 
NOTHING.  The BSL is known to be inaccurate, especially when results come 
back under 3.0, which is why the TBGs are done.

What I didn't get is why the TBG isn't done in the first place, skipping 
the BSL all together?

My answer was that the TBG result takes too long to come back from the 
lab, and if the sugar is too low and the baby needs feeding now, there 
could be a bad outcome (brain damage, etc).  I understand this, but this 
baby was showing NO sign of hypoglycaemia (and he wasn't hypo... he had a 
TBG of 3.6) and he could have quite safely waited for the TBG result...

So, I put this to the manager of the SCN... She agrees that too many 
babies recieve formula unnecessarily, and agrees that a TBG should be the 
first line of glucose testing (especially for these once-off 'at risk' 
baby testing), but the response time for results need to be looked at.  So 
that is what she is working out now, finding out if the TBG results, when 
marked URGENT can be returned sooner, so that there is not a too long 
waiting time.  Hopefully this can happen and a known inaccurate peice of 
machinery can be removed!

I hope this works out :)

Jo

Babies are Born... Pizzas are Delivered.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



Re: [ozmidwifery] Vaginal ultrasounds and dating

2002-09-08 Thread Meaghan Moon


Hi Jo,
I agree that professionals (often docs) don't listen to mothers enough 
about dates of conception, instead relying on u/s dates.  And this is the 
beginning of negating the mother's experience and knowledge of her pregancy 
as far as I'm concerned.  Where I work an LMP date almost seems superfluous 
to the docs. However, I always feel like my job is easier when mothers are 
certain about their LMP dates and when they had intercourse.  Just a 
reminder though that the date of intercourse in not necessarily the date of 
conception.  Remember sperm can live up to seven days in the reproductive 
tract so there is still window of seven days where conception could 
occur.  That said, if a mother is certain of dates that is what I use for 
dating pregnancy over u/s. Just had to get in my .02 cents worth of 
biological info...

Meaghan Moon
Manitoba, Canada

At 11:57 AM 9/8/02 +0930, you wrote:
With my last child the doctor whom I was seeing to get into the bc for a 
vbac (yeah right!) asked me when my LNMP was and I was able to tell him 
the date we conceived.  He questioned that and said I think you are a 
couple of weeks out there.  Now my hubby had gone to Sydney for a few 
weeks and we only has sex once before he left and due the limited 
opportunity allowed by our other children, the time before was a long and 
distant memory(imposed celibacy or sibling contraception don't you 
love it!  I am sure it is just a survival technique to ensure no more rivals!)
ANYWAY..this doctor would not take the fact that I knew when I 
conceived so I ended up asking him if he was hiding under the bed when 
Dean and I had sex?  He went red and promptly went on to tell me that I 
didn't look good on paper to be in the birth centre
WHAT IS IT WITH PROFESSIONALS NOT ACCEPTING THAT SOMETIMES THEY CAN BE 
WRONG?
on the topic of Vag US, there is a private OB here who has an astronomical 
cs rate and surprise surprise she gives vag US every visit...
Jo Bainbridge
founding member CARES SA
email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: 08 8388 6918
birth with trust, faith  love...
- Original Message -
From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Justine Caines
To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]OzMid List
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Vaginal ultrasounds

They are routine where I work too... the obs use them to get more accurate 
dating.  Eventhough most women know pretty much exactly the date of their 
LNMP... he still does it, to make sure.
Ack.
Jo
Hi Jo and all

Another furphy I suggest, as a vaginal US would be able to estimate the 
size of the foetus better I assume but still only place it against the 
averages of gestational sizes that US is based on, hence the +/- 2 weeks 
stuff.  The routine totally unnecessary use of US is the catalyst to the 
induction craze.  Women must be told their due date, hang knowing their 
own body, just throw it into the computer of averages!!

As a consumer I get so sick of women needing to be told  everything, 
totally discounting their role as the maker and birther of a baby!!  At 
the same time I m branded as a lunatic for taking responsibility of my 
body and baby.  Funny thing is that after this total abdication of 
responsibility in pregnancy and birth women are meant to fit back into 
society as normal citizens taking responsibility for themselves and baby 
(is this why we have so many post natal problems, women are lulled into a 
false sense of security and then on Day 6 postnatally whammo!). The notion 
of personal responsibility totally consistent with health policy for the 
last 10 years, but policy makers and governments refuse to hold obstetrics 
to account.

I sincerely hope we are at the edge with the current PI crisis and NMAP 
helping to transform maternity services in this country.

A little rattled this morning

Justine
Mum and responsible for Ruby nearly 3, Clancy 18 months and Will 2 months


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



Re: FHM

2002-05-25 Thread Meaghan Moon

Anne,
Regarding frequency of auscultation of FH:

I have read (I think in the  in the AWHONN (Association of Women's Health, 
Obstetrical and Neonatal Nursing guidelines)) that the optimal frequency of 
auscultation during labour has not been established by research.  In normal 
labour, once every 15-30 minutes in active labour and every 5-15 minutes or 
after every contraction in second stage are the commonly accepted 
frequencies (community standard) of auscultation, with extra auscultation 
with things like ROM, change in maternal status etc. There are ethical 
problems with conducting research to see if this frequency could be reduced 
which is kind of a bummer as I do find that sometimes it is disruptive to 
the flow of labour to be bugging the mum to listen when babe has been fine 
all along

Regards,
Meaghan Moon




At 02:33 PM 5/25/02 +1000, you wrote:
Dear All,

Two things,

1. does anyone have the homepage address for Michel Odent?

and

2. I cannot find any references for fetal heart monitoring (non 
electronic) and the frequency i.e. how often one should listen to the 
fetal heart.  The WHO 'Care in Normal Birth: a practical guide' recommends 
15min to half hourly during first stage then after every contraction 
during 2nd stage.  However, it gives no reference that I can find 'why' 
that this time is recommended or how they came by this recommendation.

I have searched Cochrane etc and of no use.

I would appreciate anyone who can give me some references.

With thanks,
Anne Clarke


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



Re: viruses

2002-05-03 Thread Meaghan Moon

Sally,
Yes, I understand most people don't do it knowingly (except for those who 
create them.)  If people are using virus checkers they are less likely to 
spread them.  We are having a disproportional number of them coming from 
the oz mid list, over a dozen since January.  We are on several other lists 
in this household and we have never had a problem with viruses from them.
I'm sorry if you took my request the wrong way.  I didn't mean to sound 
attacking to anyone.  It is just a plea.  Just as it is a responsibility of 
those sexually active to practice safe sex, it is the responsibility of the 
computer user to practice safe computer use and regularly update their 
virus software.  May be the list administrators can monitor the number of 
viruses passing through?

Wanting to stay connected,

Meaghan

It isAt 03:26 PM 5/3/02 +1000, you wrote:
I don't think anybody knowingly spreads viruses, more often they spread
silently and unbeknownst to the 'sender'. Sorry that you feel this way.
Sally
- Original Message -
From: Meaghan Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:00 AM
Subject: viruses


  Hello,
  Is any one else having problems with frequent viruses coming from this
  list?  We have Norton antivirus but have still had problems with the
  occasional one getting through and causing serious (and costly) damage.
I
  am feeling like I will have to uns*bscribe soon if this doesn't change.  I
  will be sorry to lose my connection to Australian midwives.  This is a
plea
  to be careful about spreading things around ...
 
  Thank You,
  Meaghan Moon
 
 
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



moxibustion

2002-04-09 Thread Meaghan Moon

Hello Oz midders,
I have been following the thread of turning breeches with moxibustion with 
interest.  Recently we had a woman in our practice with a frank breech at 
33 weeks.  I tried moxibustion at 36 weeks.  Baby didn't turn and she had a 
c-section.  This was the first time I had tried moxibustion.  I was not 
prepared for how much smoke these sticks gave off.  I gave the first 
treatment our clinic and it stunk the place up for days.  It was a strange 
one to explain to clients coming in after the event.  One client became 
very ill shortly after her exposure to the smoke.  The parents took the 
moxa home with them and did it in the bathroom with the exhaust fan on but 
it was so smokey that it discouraged them from using it.  Anyway, in Canada 
where we cannot open doors and windows at any time of year or expose bare 
toes in the outdoors this presents a problem.  Anyone got a creative solution?

Meaghan


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



Re: prenatal group

2002-02-14 Thread Meaghan Moon

Joy,
How do you pronounce this word?  I want to make sure I say it 
correctly.  It also looks like a good one to use when you have one of those 
awful all vowel scrabble hands!

Meaghan,



This is the sense of
the word 'maieutic', which means 'pertaining to the midwife'.  It's a word
we all need to learn and use frequently.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



Re: scoliosis VBAC v/s vaginal birth

2002-02-01 Thread Meaghan Moon

Hi Jan,
I have helped a woman with severe scoliosis.  Her curvature was in the 
upper back. She underwent surgery for it when she was young but she still 
has a very obvious curvature.  She doesn't have a rod in her back as far as 
I know.  In our discussions around her history she did not verbalize this 
to me.  She came to me after having had two babies (in another province) so 
I did not anticipate any problems with her.  She had all her babies 
vaginally.  Her first baby was in hospital with the familiar chain of 
intervention, second at home with midwives, third at home with me.
It would seem to me that what is relevent here is where in the back the 
curvature is.  Does it affect the pelvis at all?  The other relevent thing 
is what you have already stated regarding her lack of candidacy for an 
epidural.  (Sometimes I wish I had more clients who fell into this 
category!!)  Too bad in this case now she has the added black mark of two 
previous sections.  It is so unfair how women get labelled like this when 
they weren't given an honest fair shake in the beginning.  For us 
caregivers, it really underscores how important it is to facilitate normal 
birth for that first baby.  It may be hard work, but it is not as difficult 
as witnessing and assisting with the grief that comes when women realize 
they have been misled and wounded unnecessarily.

Meaghan

At 07:00 PM 2/1/02 +1100, you wrote:
Dear list,

Does anyone out there have any experience in caring for women who have had
scoliosis in childhood, which has led to surgery (involving insertion of a
rod down the length of the spine to correct/stabilise the situation).

I ask, as I have a friend who has experienced the above, having had surgery
at the age of 14 due to severe scoliosis.  She has since had two children,
both born my caesarean under GA (now aged 5 and 8 years).  On both
occasions, she ruptured her membranes at 38 weeks, and was wisked into
theatre there and then.  She tells me she did experience some contractions
after rupturing her membranes, and whilst in transit to hospital and waiting
to go to theatre.

She is planning to have another baby in the future, and has recently
verbalised her concern, that maybe the caesareans were performed more out of
ignorance or convenience in her situation.  She accepts that an epidural may
certainly have been out of the question given the rod in her back, however,
she was never given an opportunity to discuss this further with
doctors/anaesthetists during either pregnancy.

She was never really told why she wasn't allowed to labour on both
occasions, and now wonders if this was done out of fear or ignorance on the
subject.  She asked me as her friend and a midwife, what knowledge and
experience I have regarding this sort of situation.  I thought I would share
this with the list to get other's views in the hope that maybe someone else
out there has had a similar experience.  I

I presume the rod has some degree of flexibility, as this friend of mine has
played netball over many years, and has also attended gyms in the past. She
can sit, lie, knee, stretch, etc.  She experienced absolutely no back
problems during or following the previous pregnancies and births.

I welcome your comments, thoughts, experiences!


Jan




--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



exercise in pregnancy

2002-01-10 Thread Meaghan Moon

Hi Judy,
Although exercise in pregnancy means way more than pelvic floor exercises
I felt I had to let you know about a great workshop I went to last
weekend. It is highly likely you Ozzies know about it already as it
was developed in Brisbane. It was taught by a friend of mine who
now lives in Brisbane. We have been very lucky in Canada to have
her here to teach it. 

The workshop was called Pelvic Power. The Feldenkrais method is
used to increase awareness of, and ability to use, the muscles of the
pelvic floor. Emphasis is on integration of these movements into other
every day movements of the body. I highly recommend this
workshop for child bearing women and any woman who wants/needs to
strengthen and have a new awareness of her pelvic floor. I just
wish I had access to a Feldy here in the middle of the prairies who could
teach all my mums this fantastic method. Apparently it is popular
in Australia so maybe you are aware of it already.

Meaghan


At 09:01 AM 1/10/02 +1000, you wrote: 

Hi All,

I am interested in running a women's info session on exercise in
pregnancy and would appreciate any references/ resources you can help me
with.


Judy Chapman 


Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com.




Re: moving to Oz

2001-12-02 Thread Meaghan Moon

Hi Marilyn,
Great that you are off to Sydney soon.  I am so longing to do the same.  Do
you have midwifery work lined up there?  I am interested to hear how things
unfold for you when you arrive.  Is this a return to home for you or an
adventure in a new land?

To all you oz midders... I am wanting to move back down under sooner rather
than later - possibly in October 2002 but if not then it will be July 2003
(which seems so far away).  I have been on the list for a year now but
still don't feel like I have any more sense of how or where I might be able
to work in Oz. Your insurance troubles confound the issue.  I have worked
as a home birth midwife for eighteen years in Canada with a small but
committted mostly rural practice.

  I have been registered in Manitoba for a year and a half which is how
long we have had legal status here.  Now I have hospital admitting
privileges and some prescribing rights.  As well I have been working as the
first midwife registrar of the College of Midwives of Manitoba for the past
year.  With this job I have been involved in regulatory duties -
registering midwives, interpreting legislation and standards, supporting
midwives as they integrate as a new profession, organizing and
facilitating committees, developing policy etc.  

I am registered with a job search agency which keeps me informed of
midwifery postings in Australia and New Zealand but I know that word from
ground level is what will get me truly connected into the scene.  Any tips?
Anybody looking for a midwife who loves home birth practice?  I am worried
about finances as your cities seem very expensive to live in but that is
where I'd like to be.  I will be leaving a good salary here...

Meaghan



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.