[Bug 542990] Review Request: root - Numerical data analysis framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542990 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2010-02-19 02:57:28 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > Hi Mattias, > I make a scrutiny into your spec file, it's so sophisticated ^_^. > I have some problems about your spec. > 1.Did html.C generate all documention removed by patch10 to patch15? The patches removes pieces of the documentation markup that causes errors during documentation generation. They cause errors like: *** Interpreter error recovered *** Error in : Error processing macro MAC RO_TGraph2D_3! or: Error: illegal pointer to class object para 0x0 1367 MACRO_TParallelCoord_1.Cex ec:7: Error: illegal pointer to class object grade 0x0 1368 MACRO_TParallelCoord_1.Ce xec:8: Error: illegal pointer to class object para 0x0 1367 MACRO_TParallelCoord_1.Cex ec:9: Error: illegal pointer to class object para 0x0 1367 MACRO_TParallelCoord_1.Cex ec:10: Error: illegal pointer to class object para 0x0 1367 MACRO_TParallelCoord_1.Cex ec:11: Error: illegal pointer to class object age 0x0 1368 MACRO_TParallelCoord_1.Cexe c:12: > 2.What is the purpose of list libPyROOT.so twice? python binding normally can > only be used in python program, thus only need to be included in > python_sitearch. No, the Python interface in libPyROOT.so works both ways. You can load in Python to call root from Python, but you can also load it in root to call Python from root. > 3.There seems some dynamic libraries are plugins actually, they don't have > devel files. > See http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/root-system Most of roots libraries do double duty as plugins and dynamic libraries. It is difficult to distinguish if one of them is a plugin only. And some library that in one version of root is only a plugin can in the next version suddenly start being used as a dynamic library too. And a library that inside root is only a plugin can be used as a dynamic library by someone that develop their own software against the root libraries. Also, since root uses the C++ interpreter CINT it needs access to it's headers at runtime. So the headers can not be split off to devel packages without making the runtime and devel packages depend on each other - and then what is the use of doing the split. So in my mind there are no devel files at all, and hence I have not split off any devel packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225698] Merge Review: dmidecode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225698 --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2010-02-19 02:53:10 EST --- ping? any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226075] Merge Review: libXinerama
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226075 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2010-02-19 02:51:58 EST --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529441] Review Request: pdfbox - Java PDF library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529441 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2010-02-19 02:44:53 EST --- ping? any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558228] Review Request: perl-Tk-DirSelect - Cross-platform directory selection widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558228
--- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman
2010-02-19 00:52:24 EST ---
We're almost there.
David, you need to add perl(Test::More) to the BuildRequires of your spec file
(and in the future, please test your package with mock or koji before
submitting a .src.rpm).
>From the spec file:
>
> sed -i 's/\r//' Changes
> sed -i 's/\r//' README
Nitpick.
I'ld write this: sed -i 's/\r//' Changes README
and this really belongs in the prep section of the spec file more than the
install one.
Please consider adding "%{?perl_default_filter}" to your spec before the
%description block.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561448] Review Request: jffi - Java Foreign Function Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561448
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-02-19
00:44:15 EST ---
For 0.6.5-1:
* Compilation issue
A First of all, now build fails:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1996972
This is because -Werror.
B Even after -Werror is removed, build fails on ppc64:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1997040
The failing command is:
[exec] cc -m32 -o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/libjffi-0.6.so -shared
-mimpure-text -static-libgcc -Wl,-soname,libjffi-0.6.so -Wl,-O1
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/Array.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/Closure.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/Exception.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/FastIntInvoke.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/FastLongInvoke.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/Foreign.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/Function.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/Internals.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/Invoke.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/LastError.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/Library.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/Memory.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/MemoryIO.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/Struct.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/Type.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/jffi/deprecated.o -lffi
[exec] /usr/bin/ld: crti.o: No such file: No such file or directory
[exec] collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
[exec] make: ***
[/builddir/build/BUILD/wmeissner-jffi-bbb81f1/build/jni/libjffi-0.6.so] Error 1
---
Well, -m32 is wrong for ppc64. This is because {jni/libtest}/GNUmakefile
does not check if the arch is ppc64 or not however
this check is anyway not needed anyway.
* Test
- Forgot to mention this, however please check if some test programs
are available or not (as this package contains test/ directory)
* Empty debuginfo
---
jffi-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources
---
- Well, I don't know how Java packages treat this by default,
however generally to create debuginfo rpm corretly, libjffi-0.6.so
should not be stripped in build process itself and should
be handled by find-debuginfo.sh and so on.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306
--- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-02-19
00:02:20 EST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > (In reply to comment #15)
> > > - See my comment 9
> > >
> >
> > I don't see how rake test in rubygem-ruby-debug can succeed, when executed
> > from
> > the %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{geminstdir}, without the ext/
> > directory
> > from rubygem-ruby-debug-base in /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/ruby-debug-0.10.3/
> >
>
> This should have said:
>
> I don't see how rake test in rubygem-ruby-debug can succeed, when executed
> from
> the %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{geminstdir}, without the ext/ directory
> from rubygem-ruby-debug-base in /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/ruby-debug-0.10.3/ or
> %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{geminstdir}
- So please see my comment 9. Already patch attached.
(In reply to comment #16)
> > > 2) I see no use for two separate packages
> > - It makes maintenanse much easier.
>
> Actually it doesn't, as we have seen with the rails packages as well.
- No. It is just on Fedora chain-build cannot be used for rails
related packages other than rawhide branch. It is just Fedora's
builder issue.
Seperating srpm is always preferable, for example when security
issue is found on actionpack, we just apply a patch against actionpack
only and only release new actionpack. Recompiling rails releated
packages all is just silly in such case.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560894] Review Request: perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod - Allow a module's pod to contain Pod::Coverage hints
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560894 Bug 560894 depends on bug 555248, which changed state. Bug 555248 Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Eventual - Read a POD document as a series of trivial events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555248 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 23:10:28 EST --- perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-0.092830-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-0.092830-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560894] Review Request: perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod - Allow a module's pod to contain Pod::Coverage hints
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560894 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 23:10:32 EST --- perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-0.092830-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-0.092830-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566342] Review Request: dogtag-pki: Meta-package for Dogtag PKI Suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566342 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) 2010-02-18 22:14:19 EST --- Can we have correct srpm link please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563844] Review Request: pyzim - Python reimplementation of Zim by the author
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563844 --- Comment #3 from Cheese Lee 2010-02-18 21:50:50 EST --- update to 0.44 Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/612778/pyzim.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/612778/pyzim-0.44-1.fc12.src.rpm Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/612778/zim.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/612778/zim-0.44-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 W. Michael Petullo changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #28 from W. Michael Petullo 2010-02-18 21:28:28 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: dmapd Short Description: A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares Owners: mikep Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562470] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||huzai...@redhat.com,
||xav...@bachelot.org
--- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2010-02-18 19:12:08
EST ---
Few comments :
- -b 0 in %setup is useless
- %{_sysconfdir}/openvas/openvas-client_log.conf should be marked as
%config(noreplace)
- manfiles should end with .* rather than .gz in case the compression format
ever changes.
- Missing BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop
- You must not add a vendor tag to the desktop file.
Adding Huzaifa to the CC list.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566290] Review Request: goddard-backgrounds - Goddard desktop backgrounds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566290
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2010-02-18
18:58:00 EST ---
Further review:
+ $ md5sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/goddard-backgrounds-12.91.0.tar.lzma
Download/goddard-backgrounds-12.91.0.tar.lzma
6db2255dbaf9e5d8609a1fe06b1629ee
rpmbuild/SOURCES/goddard-backgrounds-12.91.0.tar.lzma
6db2255dbaf9e5d8609a1fe06b1629ee Download/goddard-backgrounds-12.91.0.tar.lzma
+ md5sum extracted from srpm files matches md5sum the upstream source
+ Package succesfully compiled and built into binary rpms with noarch BuildArc
+ BuidRequires and requires are provided on spec file
+ No bundled copies of system libraires
+ Package owns all directories that it created
+ Files from %file are listed once in spec files
+ Permission on files are properly set.
+ Package is a clean section which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Consistent use of macros
+ Contents are wallpapers under CC-BY-SA created by Fedora Design team
+ Package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install
+ Filename in rm packages is valid UTF-8
+ Source package include license text as separate file
+ no scriptlets used
After thoroughly reviewed both srpm and spec file, goddard-backgrounds fully
complies to Fedora Packaging Guideline and set to accept.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562469] Review Request: openvas-scanner - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Scanner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562469
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||huzai...@redhat.com,
||xav...@bachelot.org
--- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot 2010-02-18 18:59:54
EST ---
Few comments :
- -b 0 in %setup is useless
- $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_sysconfdir}/openvas is created twice
- you can save some lines by using "install -Dp ..." rather than "mkdir ...;
install -p ..."
- some file are packaged twice due to %{_sysconfdir}/openvas in %file. Should
be %dir %{_sysconfdir}/openvas.
- the logrotate file should be marked as %config(noreplace)
- manfiles should end with .* rather than .gz in case the compression format
ever changes.
Adding Huzaifa to the CC list.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560 --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2010-02-18 18:57:57 EST --- > Version: 290409 Their scheme appears to be %d-%m-%y, which looks fragile. What would happen if they released the next update on 7th of October? 071009 < 290409 > -shared -Wl,-soname,libaesgm.so.0.0 Is the double-zero intentional? $ rpmls -p libaesgm-290409-1.fc12.i686.rpm |grep /usr/lib lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib/libaesgm.so.0 lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib/libaesgm.so.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/libaesgm.so.0.0.0 * There is no default %clean section yet to "rm -rf %buildroot". * A proper namespace for the header files would be better than generic names such as /usr/include/aes.h, e.g. installing into %_includedir/aesgm or %_includedir/libaesgm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 562467] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562467
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||huzai...@redhat.com,
||xav...@bachelot.org
--- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2010-02-18 18:43:07
EST ---
The spec file looks generally clean, with a few nitpicks :
- the -b 0 argument to %setup is useless.
- Why no parallel build ? ("make" rather than "make %{?_smp_mflags}"). If it's
failing then that should be added as a comment into the spec.
- the .gz at the end of the manfiles lines in %file should be changed to .* in
case the compression format ever change.
Actually, my biggest concern about this review request is it should not be a
review request in the first place as openvas-libraries is already packaged. I
suggest you submit a patch against the devel branch to Huzaifa, and also that
you apply for co-maintainership on openvas-libraries. I'm adding him to the CC
list.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508750] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line interface to the freedesktop.org trashcan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508750
--- Comment #15 from David A. Wheeler 2010-02-18
18:20:56 EST ---
Sigh - there's a small problem. This new spec's Release number doesn't match
the Changelog. It says:
Release:1%{?dist}
but the Changelog says:
* Thu Feb 18 2010 Rahul Sundaram - 0.11.2-2
(note the -2 at the end.)
I doubt upstream will update their man page. It's this *Fedora* package that
is renaming "trash" into "trash-put". Since the rename is a Fedora-local
change, it'd be nice if the installed Fedora docs matched what's installed (at
least in the Name, Synopsis, and Examples sections for trash-put). Since man
pages aren't REQUIRED, I guess I can't REQUIRE that change, but I think I
should note that.
Note to others reading this review request: This spec depends on more-modern
rpm, so this spec would need to be changed for older RPM-based systems like
EPEL 5 or less:
* %install does not start with "rm -rf %{buildroot}".
This violates the guidelines of:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines
* No "BuildRoot" value set. This violates the *old* review guidelines.
I view these as both okay, since the Fedora guidelines now specifically permit
this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
I thought it'd be important to document that.
So please fix the release, consider the man page change, and repost. You're
almost there!!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 --- Comment #12 from Till Maas 2010-02-18 17:50:19 EST --- (In reply to comment #11) > I took the package review guidelines > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines as guide for the > reviews. Did you take a look at other completed reviews? Usually a template like https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ReviewTemplate or http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/Review_Template or http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BernardJohnson/ReviewTemplate is used to show, what has been checked and to help not to forget to check something. Doing this is not required, but it might help you. > Do you need a list of reviews? Thanks, but I guess they are all included in this query: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&bug_status=POST&bug_status=CLOSED&component=Package%20Review&email1=mrunge%40fedoraproject.org&emailcc1=1&emaillongdesc1=1&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=exact&product=Fedora&query_format=advanced I will try to look through these and review this package soon, but you would be the first person I sponsor, and therefore I might be a little to careful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560289] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-MessageStack - Message stack for your CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560289 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:43:16 EST --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-MessageStack-0.34-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Net-Google-AuthSub-0.5 |perl-Net-Google-AuthSub-0.5 |-1.fc12 |-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561761] Review Request: perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered - Conversion of numbered HTML entities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561761 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:43:38 EST --- perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered-0.04-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-1394 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561761] Review Request: perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered - Conversion of numbered HTML entities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561761 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:40:22 EST --- perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered-0.04-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTML-Entities-Numbered'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1435 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564557] Review Request: gfs-goschen-fonts - A 19th century Greek typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564557 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||gfs-goschen-fonts-20100203- ||1.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560289] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-MessageStack - Message stack for your CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560289 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CGI-Application-Plugin |perl-CGI-Application-Plugin |-MessageStack-0.34-1.fc11 |-MessageStack-0.34-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 541535] Review Request: raul - Realtime Audio Utility Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541535 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||raul-0.6.0-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555653] Review Request: ghc-haskeline - Haskell command-line interface for user input
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555653 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:41:12 EST --- ghc-haskeline-0.6.2.1-2.1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564557] Review Request: gfs-goschen-fonts - A 19th century Greek typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564557 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:40:40 EST --- gfs-goschen-fonts-20100203-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 541535] Review Request: raul - Realtime Audio Utility Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541535 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|raul-0.6.0-2.fc11 |raul-0.6.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:43:04 EST --- perl-Net-Google-AuthSub-0.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555983] Review Request: perl-Email-Sender - A library for sending email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555983 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:42:39 EST --- perl-Email-Sender-0.100110-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560289] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-MessageStack - Message stack for your CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560289 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:42:52 EST --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-MessageStack-0.34-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555983] Review Request: perl-Email-Sender - A library for sending email
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555983 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Email-Sender-0.100110- ||1.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560289] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-MessageStack - Message stack for your CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560289 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-CGI-Application-Plugin ||-MessageStack-0.34-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 541535] Review Request: raul - Realtime Audio Utility Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541535 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:40:27 EST --- raul-0.6.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 541535] Review Request: raul - Realtime Audio Utility Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541535 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:42:07 EST --- raul-0.6.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523650] Review Request: qmpdclient - A Qt4 based MPD client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||qmpdclient-1.1.2-4.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556308] Review Request: paratype-pt-sans-fonts - A pan-Cyrillic typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556308 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:37:43 EST --- paratype-pt-sans-fonts-20100112-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555248] Review Request: perl-Pod-Eventual - Read a POD document as a series of trivial events
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555248 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:38:22 EST --- perl-Pod-Eventual-0.093330-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561225] Review Request: caribou - a simplified in-place on-screen keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561225 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||caribou-0.0.2-1.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555248] Review Request: perl-Pod-Eventual - Read a POD document as a series of trivial events
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555248 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Pod-Eventual-0.093330- |perl-Pod-Eventual-0.093330- |1.fc12 |1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 509160] Review Request: mine_detector – a mine-finding game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509160 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mine_detector-6.0-3.fc11|mine_detector-6.0-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 546445] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check-updates - A Nagios plugin to check if Red Hat or Fedora system is up-to-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546445 --- Comment #2 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2010-02-18 17:34:14 EST --- New upstream version: http://um-pe09-2.di.uminho.pt./fedora/nagios-plugins-check-updates-1.4.7-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566598] Review Request: cover-thumbnailer - Display music cover and more in nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566598 FLOZz changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 509160] Review Request: mine_detector – a mine-finding game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509160 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:35:47 EST --- mine_detector-6.0-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566598] Review Request: cover-thumbnailer - Display music cover and more in nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566598 --- Comment #1 from FLOZz 2010-02-18 17:37:23 EST --- rmplint output : cover-thumbnailer.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/cover-thumbnailer.schemas 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. build successfully with mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523650] Review Request: qmpdclient - A Qt4 based MPD client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:36:57 EST --- qmpdclient-1.1.2-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561225] Review Request: caribou - a simplified in-place on-screen keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561225 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:34:09 EST --- caribou-0.0.2-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556308] Review Request: paratype-pt-sans-fonts - A pan-Cyrillic typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556308 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|paratype-pt-sans-fonts-2010 |paratype-pt-sans-fonts-2010 |0112-2.fc11 |0112-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555248] Review Request: perl-Pod-Eventual - Read a POD document as a series of trivial events
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555248 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Pod-Eventual-0.093330- ||1.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 509160] Review Request: mine_detector – a mine-finding game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509160 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||mine_detector-6.0-3.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 509160] Review Request: mine_detector – a mine-finding game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509160 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:33:24 EST --- mine_detector-6.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556489] Review Request: erlang-esasl - Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) support for Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556489 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:29:26 EST --- erlang-esasl-0.1-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update erlang-esasl'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-1250 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556308] Review Request: paratype-pt-sans-fonts - A pan-Cyrillic typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556308 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:28:28 EST --- paratype-pt-sans-fonts-20100112-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555248] Review Request: perl-Pod-Eventual - Read a POD document as a series of trivial events
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555248 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:28:39 EST --- perl-Pod-Eventual-0.093330-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556308] Review Request: paratype-pt-sans-fonts - A pan-Cyrillic typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556308 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||paratype-pt-sans-fonts-2010 ||0112-2.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550138] Review Request: xcftools - Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550138 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|xcftools-1.0.7-1.fc12 |xcftools-1.0.7-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550138] Review Request: xcftools - Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550138 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:23:41 EST --- xcftools-1.0.7-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556308] Review Request: paratype-pt-sans-fonts - A pan-Cyrillic typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556308 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|paratype-pt-sans-fonts-2010 |paratype-pt-sans-fonts-2010 |0112-2.fc13 |0112-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566598] New: Review Request: cover-thumbnailer - Display music cover and more in nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cover-thumbnailer - Display music cover and more in nautilus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566598 Summary: Review Request: cover-thumbnailer - Display music cover and more in nautilus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: f...@flogisoft.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tmp.fgsp.org/fedora/rpm/cover-thumbnailer.spec SRPM URL: http://tmp.fgsp.org/fedora/rpm/cover-thumbnailer-0.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Cover thumbnailer is a small Python script which displays music album covers in nautilus, preview of pictures which are in a folder and more. The script fits in nautilus like any other thumbnailer of the GNOME thumbnail factory; so you don't have to run it manually to generate thumbnails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532523] Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532523 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:24:58 EST --- jarjar-0.9-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jarjar'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-1722 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556840] Review Request: apache-commons-exec - Java library to reliably execute external processes from within the JVM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556840 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||apache-commons-exec-1.0.1-2 ||.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563821] Review Request: globus-xio-pipe-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus Pipe Driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563821 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:23:34 EST --- globus-core-5.15-8.fc12, globus-openssl-4.0-1.fc12, globus-common-11.2-1.fc12, globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-6.fc12, globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-2.0-1.fc12, globus-openssl-module-1.1-1.fc12, globus-gsi-cert-utils-6.4-1.fc12, globus-gsi-sysconfig-3.0-1.fc12, globus-gsi-callback-2.5-1.fc12, globus-gsi-credential-3.2-1.fc12, globus-gsi-proxy-core-4.3-1.fc12, globus-callout-0.7-6.fc12, globus-gssapi-gsi-7.0-2.fc12, globus-gss-assist-5.5-1.fc12, globus-proxy-utils-3.5-1.fc12, globus-xio-2.8-2.fc12, globus-gssapi-error-2.5-5.fc12, globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-4.fc12, globus-xio-popen-driver-0.7-1.fc12, globus-xio-pipe-driver-0.1-1.fc12, globus-io-6.3-4.fc12, globus-ftp-control-2.11-1.fc12, globus-ftp-client-5.2-1.fc12, globus-gass-transfer-4.3-1.fc12, globus-gass-copy-5.3-1.fc12, globus-rsl-7.1-1.fc12, globus-rsl-assist-2.1-4.fc12, globus-usage-1.1-1.fc12, globus-rls-client-5.2-1.fc12, globus-rls-server-4.9-1.fc12, globus-authz-callout-error-0.4-2.fc12, globus-authz-0.7-2.fc12, globus-gfork-0.2-4.fc12, globus-gridftp-server-control-0.40-1.fc12, globus-gridftp-server-3.19-1.fc12, globus-gram-protocol-9.3-1.fc12, globus-gram-client-9.1-1.fc12, globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-2.fc12, globus-gass-cache-5.4-2.fc12, globus-gass-cache-program-2.8-1.fc12, globus-scheduler-event-generator-2.1-2.fc12, globus-gatekeeper-5.3-1.fc12, globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-0.2-2.fc12, globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-2.4-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update globus-core globus-openssl globus-common globus-gsi-openssl-error globus-gsi-proxy-ssl globus-openssl-module globus-gsi-cert-utils globus-gsi-sysconfig globus-gsi-callback globus-gsi-credential globus-gsi-proxy-core globus-callout globus-gssapi-gsi globus-gss-assist globus-proxy-utils globus-xio globus-gssapi-error globus-xio-gsi-driver globus-xio-popen-driver globus-xio-pipe-driver globus-io globus-ftp-control globus-ftp-client globus-gass-transfer globus-gass-copy globus-rsl globus-rsl-assist globus-usage globus-rls-client globus-rls-server globus-authz-callout-error globus-authz globus-gfork globus-gridftp-server-control globus-gridftp-server globus-gram-protocol globus-gram-client globus-gass-server-ez globus-gass-cache globus-gass-cache-program globus-scheduler-event-generator globus-gatekeeper globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error globus-gram-job-manager-scripts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1513 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551265] Review Request: gnome-xcf-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for XCF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551265 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:24:35 EST --- gnome-xcf-thumbnailer-1.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:25:36 EST --- pidgin-sipe-1.8.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pidgin-sipe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-1585 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556308] Review Request: paratype-pt-sans-fonts - A pan-Cyrillic typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556308 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:26:06 EST --- paratype-pt-sans-fonts-20100112-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551265] Review Request: gnome-xcf-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for XCF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551265 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|gnome-xcf-thumbnailer-1.0-2 |gnome-xcf-thumbnailer-1.0-2 |.fc11 |.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556840] Review Request: apache-commons-exec - Java library to reliably execute external processes from within the JVM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556840 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:24:13 EST --- apache-commons-exec-1.0.1-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 563821] Review Request: globus-xio-pipe-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus Pipe Driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563821 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:22:04 EST --- globus-core-5.15-8.fc11, globus-openssl-4.0-1.fc11, globus-common-11.2-1.fc11, globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-6.fc11, globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-2.0-1.fc11, globus-openssl-module-1.1-1.fc11, globus-gsi-cert-utils-6.4-1.fc11, globus-gsi-sysconfig-3.0-1.fc11, globus-gsi-callback-2.5-1.fc11, globus-gsi-credential-3.2-1.fc11, globus-gsi-proxy-core-4.3-1.fc11, globus-callout-0.7-6.fc11, globus-gssapi-gsi-7.0-2.fc11, globus-gss-assist-5.5-1.fc11, globus-proxy-utils-3.5-1.fc11, globus-xio-2.8-2.fc11, globus-gssapi-error-2.5-5.fc11, globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-4.fc11, globus-xio-popen-driver-0.7-1.fc11, globus-xio-pipe-driver-0.1-1.fc11, globus-io-6.3-4.fc11, globus-ftp-control-2.11-1.fc11, globus-ftp-client-5.2-1.fc11, globus-gass-transfer-4.3-1.fc11, globus-gass-copy-5.3-1.fc11, globus-rsl-7.1-1.fc11, globus-rsl-assist-2.1-4.fc11, globus-usage-1.1-1.fc11, globus-rls-client-5.2-1.fc11, globus-rls-server-4.9-1.fc11, globus-authz-callout-error-0.4-2.fc11, globus-authz-0.7-2.fc11, globus-gfork-0.2-4.fc11, globus-gridftp-server-control-0.40-1.fc11, globus-gridftp-server-3.19-1.fc11, globus-gram-protocol-9.3-1.fc11, globus-gram-client-9.1-1.fc11, globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-2.fc11, globus-gass-cache-5.4-2.fc11, globus-gass-cache-program-2.8-1.fc11, globus-scheduler-event-generator-2.1-2.fc11, globus-gatekeeper-5.3-1.fc11, globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-0.2-2.fc11, globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-2.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update globus-core globus-openssl globus-common globus-gsi-openssl-error globus-gsi-proxy-ssl globus-openssl-module globus-gsi-cert-utils globus-gsi-sysconfig globus-gsi-callback globus-gsi-credential globus-gsi-proxy-core globus-callout globus-gssapi-gsi globus-gss-assist globus-proxy-utils globus-xio globus-gssapi-error globus-xio-gsi-driver globus-xio-popen-driver globus-xio-pipe-driver globus-io globus-ftp-control globus-ftp-client globus-gass-transfer globus-gass-copy globus-rsl globus-rsl-assist globus-usage globus-rls-client globus-rls-server globus-authz-callout-error globus-authz globus-gfork globus-gridftp-server-control globus-gridftp-server globus-gram-protocol globus-gram-client globus-gass-server-ez globus-gass-cache globus-gass-cache-program globus-scheduler-event-generator globus-gatekeeper globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error globus-gram-job-manager-scripts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-1328 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 556489] Review Request: erlang-esasl - Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) support for Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556489 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:21:50 EST --- erlang-esasl-0.1-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update erlang-esasl'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1675 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:20:36 EST --- pidgin-sipe-1.8.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pidgin-sipe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1593 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550138] Review Request: xcftools - Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550138 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||xcftools-1.0.7-1.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:20:59 EST --- perl-Net-Google-AuthSub-0.5-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Net-Google-AuthSub-0.5 ||-1.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532523] Review request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532523 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:20:45 EST --- jarjar-0.9-5.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jarjar'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1945 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554714] Review Request: python-psutil - A process utilities module for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554714 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Spura 2010-02-18 17:19:25 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) > Sorry for the delay, I was waiting for Python 3 guidelines validation ^^. > > Since these guidelines doesn't recommand to package Python 3 modules without > upstream support, and since there is no plan yet for psutil to support Python > 3, I leave my .spec... For the moment ;) That's a reason to push upstream to get a plan :-P See: http://code.google.com/p/psutil/issues/detail?id=75 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551265] Review Request: gnome-xcf-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for XCF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551265 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||gnome-xcf-thumbnailer-1.0-2 ||.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551265] Review Request: gnome-xcf-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for XCF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551265 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:21:12 EST --- gnome-xcf-thumbnailer-1.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 550138] Review Request: xcftools - Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550138 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 17:22:44 EST --- xcftools-1.0.7-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 Christian Krause changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #27 from Christian Krause 2010-02-18 17:00:38 EST --- Thanks for the new package. Please don't forget to upload the 0.0.23 tarball to http://www.flyn.org/projects/dmapd/ too. All show-stoppers were solved. -> APPROVED Here are a couple of items I still don't like but which don't block the review: - although the spec file is technically correct it would be better for further "maintainability" (also by other maintainers), if the standard order of the sections would by 100% followed - the same applies for squeezing the scriptlets into a single line (opposite to Fedora's templates) - all debug, warning and error messages should be written into a log file rather to stdout/stderr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554714] Review Request: python-psutil - A process utilities module for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554714 --- Comment #6 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2010-02-18 16:45:30 EST --- Sorry for the delay, I was waiting for Python 3 guidelines validation ^^. Since these guidelines doesn't recommand to package Python 3 modules without upstream support, and since there is no plan yet for psutil to support Python 3, I leave my .spec... For the moment ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553769] Review Request: euca2ools - Tools for Eucalyptus EC2-compatible Computation Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553769 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 16:22:12 EST --- euca2ools-1.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/euca2ools-1.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553769] Review Request: euca2ools - Tools for Eucalyptus EC2-compatible Computation Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553769 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 16:22:38 EST --- euca2ools-1.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/euca2ools-1.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553769] Review Request: euca2ools - Tools for Eucalyptus EC2-compatible Computation Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553769 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-18 16:20:35 EST --- euca2ools-1.2-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/euca2ools-1.2-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566560] Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560 --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-02-18 15:06:34 EST --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1997477 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566560] New: Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566560 Summary: Review Request: libaesgm - Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcall...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/libaesgm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/libaesgm-290409-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Library implementation of AES (Rijndael) cryptographic methods -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523715] Review Request: logiweb - a system for electronic distribution of mathematics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523715 --- Comment #27 from Klaus Grue 2010-02-18 14:45:32 EST --- Version 0.2.8-3 is out. The new version is here: Spec URL: http://logiweb.eu/1.0/doc/download/logiweb.spec SRPM URL: http://logiweb.eu/1.0/doc/download/logiweb-0.2.8-3.fc11.src.rpm HTML URL: http://logiweb.eu/1.0/doc/download/rpm.html Mirror: http://logiweb.imm.dtu.dk/1.0/doc/download/rpm.html Mirror: http://topps.diku.dk/logiweb/1.0/doc/download/rpm.html Version 0.2.8-3 is a temporary version which prints debugging information at each garbage collection. Furthermore, the build error I made when compiling 0.2.8-2 should be corrected so that ulimit is called. Hopefully, that prevents this build failure: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1980267 ulimit problem Furthermore, it may narrow down the cause of http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1995837 Heap too small -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566171] Review Request: libhid - A userspace USB HID acess library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566171 Manuel F Martinez changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||libhid --- Comment #1 from Manuel F Martinez 2010-02-18 14:40:26 EST --- Further information: Following the Packaging guidlines, I also have build on koji and it builds fine for F12 and F13 in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=closed&owner=manpaz Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225916] Merge Review: isdn4k-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225916 --- Comment #2 from Ngo Than 2010-02-18 14:24:03 EST --- all above report issues is fixed in http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1997412 >isdn4k-utils.src: W: strange-permission capi.init 0775 >isdn4k-utils.src: W: strange-permission isdn.init 0775 it can only fixed on the server side, please ignore >isdn4k-utils.i686: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information >>/usr/lib/pppd/2.4.4/userpass.so it's plugin and statically linked. It's a issue in rpmlint. Please ignore >isdn4k-utils.i686: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/peers/isdn/avm-ml 0600 >isdn4k-utils.i686: E: non-readable /etc/vbox/vboxd.conf 0640 >isdn4k-utils.i686: E: non-readable /etc/vbox/vboxgetty.conf 0640 >isdn4k-utils.i686: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/peers/isdn/leased 0600 >isdn4k-utils.i686: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/peers/isdn/arcor 0600 >isdn4k-utils.i686: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/peers/isdn/otelo 0600 >isdn4k-utils.i686: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/peers/isdn/avm 0600 >isdn4k-utils.i686: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/peers/isdn/talkline 0600 the files contains sensitive datas like passwords, the permission is correct >isdn4k-utils.i686: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/vbox >isdn4k-utils.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger chmod >isdn4k-utils.i686: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/capi >isdn4k-utils.i686: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/capi >isdn4k-utils.i686: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn it's not needed to be fixed, please ignore >isdn4k-utils.i686: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isapnp_isdn >isdn4k-utils.i686: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isapnp_isdn >isdn4k-utils.i686: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isapnp_isdn >isdn4k-utils.i686: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isdnlog >isdn4k-utils.i686: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isdnlog >isdn4k-utils.i686: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn isdnlog it's a bug in rpmlint, please ignore. This bug is already reported to rpmlint maintainer >package version: Release tag should be in form 0.67.20091020cvs but as it's >already out... NEED COMMENT i don't think it's a must to fix it.. we can ignore it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508441] Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508441 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(lkund...@v3.sk) | --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-02-18 14:27:22 EST --- Sorry for the delay. I'm happy with this now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508441] Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508441 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? |needinfo?(lkund...@v3.sk) --- Comment #6 from Sebastian Dziallas 2010-02-18 14:11:29 EST --- Ping? I won't be able to take it on this weekend anyway since I'll be travelling. Probably the weekend after, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566407] Review Request: perl-Number-Bytes-Human - Convert byte count to human readable format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566407 Nikolay Ulyanitsky changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||566410 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566410] Review Request: snmpcheck - An utility to get information via SNMP protocols
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410 Nikolay Ulyanitsky changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||566407 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566536] Review Request: rubygem-construct - A DSL for creating temporary files and directories during testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566536 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||553898 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566536] New: Review Request: rubygem-construct - A DSL for creating temporary files and directories during testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-construct - A DSL for creating temporary files and directories during testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566536 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-construct - A DSL for creating temporary files and directories during testing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kana...@kanarip.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-construct.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-construct-1.1.0-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: A DSL for creating temporary files and directories during testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306
--- Comment #17 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-02-18
13:49:42 EST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > - See my comment 9
> >
>
> I don't see how rake test in rubygem-ruby-debug can succeed, when executed
> from
> the %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{geminstdir}, without the ext/ directory
> from rubygem-ruby-debug-base in /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/ruby-debug-0.10.3/
>
This should have said:
I don't see how rake test in rubygem-ruby-debug can succeed, when executed from
the %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{geminstdir}, without the ext/ directory
from rubygem-ruby-debug-base in /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/ruby-debug-0.10.3/ or
%{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{geminstdir}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 566536] Review Request: rubygem-construct - A DSL for creating temporary files and directories during testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566536 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||532306 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||566536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553898] Review Request: rubygem-jeweler - Craft the perfect RubyGem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553898 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||566536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306
--- Comment #16 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-02-18
13:48:14 EST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > 1) I cannot get this:
> > - http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ruby-debug.spec
> > http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby-debug-0.10.3-4.fc12.src.rpm
> > to work with this:
> > - http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ruby-debug-base.spec
> > http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby-debug-base-0.10.3-5.fc12.src.rpm
>
> - See my comment 9
>
I don't see how rake test in rubygem-ruby-debug can succeed, when executed from
the %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{geminstdir}, without the ext/ directory
from rubygem-ruby-debug-base in /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/ruby-debug-0.10.3/
> > 2) I see no use for two separate packages
> - It makes maintenanse much easier.
Actually it doesn't, as we have seen with the rails packages as well.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
