[Bug 561466] Review Request: jnr-constants - Java Native Runtime constants
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561466 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-28 01:50:40 EDT --- jnr-constants-0.7-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532819] Review Request: gdouros-symbola-fonts - A symbol font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532819 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-28 01:50:25 EDT --- gdouros-symbola-fonts-2.54-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561466] Review Request: jnr-constants - Java Native Runtime constants
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561466 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|jnr-constants-0.7-2.fc13|jnr-constants-0.7-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631874] Review Request: liboauth - OAuth library functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631874 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|bti-028-1.fc12 |bti-028-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 631874] Review Request: liboauth - OAuth library functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631874 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-28 01:51:24 EDT --- bti-028-1.fc14, liboauth-0.9.0-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634388] Review Request: python-chameleon - XML-based template compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634388 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-chameleon-1.2.12-4.f ||c14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-09-28 01:49:10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633089] Review Request: rubygem-fakeweb - A tool for faking responses to HTTP requests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633089 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-fakeweb-1.3.0-3.fc1 ||4 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-09-28 01:48:14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532819] Review Request: gdouros-symbola-fonts - A symbol font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532819 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|gdouros-symbola-fonts-2.54- |gdouros-symbola-fonts-2.54- |1.fc13 |1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-28 02:35:40 EDT --- perl-IPC-Signal-1.00-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IPC-Signal-1.00-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574531] Review Request: python26-nose - The nose testing package for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574531 --- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-09-28 05:11:24 EDT --- Hi Dave, This is all reviewed and approved can we (you) proceed? Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606551] Review Request: python26-nose - A discovery-based unittest extension for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606551 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-09-28 05:13:49 EDT --- Just realised there are two of these , second one bug #574531 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636819] Review Request: gnome-exe-thumbnailer - gnome thumbnailer for exe files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636819 --- Comment #10 from elad el...@doom.co.il 2010-09-28 05:50:40 EDT --- fixed a typo: http://elad.fedorapeople.org/gnome-exe-thumbnailer-0.6-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630932] Review Request: ibus-table-others- Various tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630932 --- Comment #4 from Naveen Kumar nku...@redhat.com 2010-09-28 06:09:58 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://nkumar.fedorapeople.org/ibus-table-others/1.3.0.20100907-2/ibus-table-others.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://nkumar.fedorapeople.org/ibus-table-others/1.3.0.20100907-2/ibus-table-others-1.3.0.20100907-2.fc13.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2493776 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638126] New: Review Request: motoya-lcedar-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface TrueType fonts by MOTOYA Co,LTD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: motoya-lcedar-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface TrueType fonts by MOTOYA Co,LTD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638126 Summary: Review Request: motoya-lcedar-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface TrueType fonts by MOTOYA Co,LTD Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ta...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/motoya-lcedar-fonts/motoya-lcedar-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/motoya-lcedar-fonts/motoya-lcedar-fonts-1.00-0.1.20100928git.fc13.src.rpm Description: Motoya font was created in 1950s, it aims beauty and readability. MotoyaLCedar W3 mono, Gothic-typeface font was contributed by MOTOYA Co,LTD. for Android platform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638127] New: Review Request: motoya-lmaru-fonts - Japanese Round Gothic-typeface TrueType fonts by MOTOYA Co,LTD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: motoya-lmaru-fonts - Japanese Round Gothic-typeface TrueType fonts by MOTOYA Co,LTD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638127 Summary: Review Request: motoya-lmaru-fonts - Japanese Round Gothic-typeface TrueType fonts by MOTOYA Co,LTD Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ta...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com, fonts-b...@lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-b...@lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/motoya-lmaru-fonts/motoya-lmaru-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/motoya-lmaru-fonts/motoya-lmaru-fonts-1.00-0.1.20100928git.fc13.src.rpm Description: Motoya font was created in 1950s, it aims beauty and readability. MotoyaLMaru W3 mono, Round Gothic-typeface font was contributed by MOTOYA Co,LTD. for Android platform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 --- Comment #34 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-09-28 06:41:11 EDT --- Next step is to do the SCM admin request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630204] Review Request: ghc-mtlparse - Haskell mtlparse library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630204 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-09-28 07:07:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) * Seems https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Haskell is out of date. Yes - I have started revising them: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell but not finished yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 426990] Review Request: mytop - A top clone for MySQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426990 --- Comment #15 from Michal Ingeli m...@v3.sk 2010-09-28 08:17:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) Are you interested in doing mytop for EPEL 4? If not I can take care of EPEL 4. Not particularly, but after changing source from xz to gzip it builds fine under EL4. I don't have EL4 anywhere around, so if you can test this [1] scratch build, I will request branch for EL4. Feel free to ask about ACLs after you get sponsored. [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2493885 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(lakshminaras2002@ |fedora-cvs+ |gmail.com) | --- Comment #35 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2010-09-28 08:21:31 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-hslogger Short Description: A logging framework for Haskell Owners: narasim Branches: f14 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615692] Review Request: ghc-gtk - Haskell gtk binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615692 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630222] Review Request: ghc-colour - A model for human colour/color perception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630222 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630222] Review Request: ghc-colour - A model for human colour/color perception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630222 --- Comment #6 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2010-09-28 09:24:19 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225681] Merge Review: desktop-file-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225681 --- Comment #17 from Ray Strode [halfline] rstr...@redhat.com 2010-09-28 09:32:24 EDT --- looks fine, feel free to commit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629247] Rename Request: meego-panel-myzone - MeeGo Panel for display of current social information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629247 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-09-28 09:53:54 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2010-09-28 09:53:54 EDT --- Built and headed to rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630782] Rename request: meego-panel-applications - MeeGo Panel for launching Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630782 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2010-09-28 10:00:36 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2010-09-28 10:00:36 EDT --- Built and headed to rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226203] Merge Review: nss_db
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226203 Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2010-09-28 10:40:50 --- Comment #2 from Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com 2010-09-28 10:40:50 EDT --- http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nss_db/ gives me Firefox can't find the server at cvs.fedora.redhat.com and https://pkgdb.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/pkg/packages/srpm/4000/ refers to SRPM details for nss-3.12.3.99.3-9.el6. We are at 3.12.7 and those questions where already answered. I'm closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 605413] Review Request: pymongo - Python driver for MongoDB
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605413 Silas Sewell si...@sewell.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||si...@sewell.ch --- Comment #6 from Silas Sewell si...@sewell.ch 2010-09-28 11:10:07 EDT --- Here is my personal spec that addresses some things mentioned above (as you can see I prefer lowercase names, something Debian gets right). http://github.com/silas/rpms/raw/master/pymongo/pymongo.spec Ian Weller if you update your spec I'd be happy to review it, otherwise I'd also be happy to take the request over if you're not interested anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629326] Review Request: mysql-workbench - A MySQL visual database modeling, administration and querying tool.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629326 --- Comment #24 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2010-09-28 11:56:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) But F-11 branch on Koji has been turned off for a long time. I think uuid-devel can be removed. Yes, but i prefer to keep conditional stuff to be able to rebuild it for f11, even if this is not for official repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226203] Merge Review: nss_db
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226203 --- Comment #3 from Nalin Dahyabhai na...@redhat.com 2010-09-28 12:10:00 EDT --- Not sure why I missed your original question, but nss and nss_db are different package, and fwiw I'm still interested in having a merge review done. Since Fedora moved to git for storing packaging data, the current .spec file can be found here: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=nss_db.git;a=blob;f=nss_db.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226332] Merge Review: pygobject2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226332 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2010-09-28 12:16:57 EDT --- rpmlint reported ect2.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/gtk-2.0/glib/_glib.so _glib.so()(64bit) pygobject2.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gio/unix.so unix.so()(64bit) pygobject2.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gobject/_gobject.so _gobject.so()(64bit) pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyExc_ImportError pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyExc_ValueError pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 _Py_NoneStruct pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyCObject_Type pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyString_AsString pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyGILState_Release pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 _PyObject_CallFunction_SizeT pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyObject_IsTrue pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyErr_GivenExceptionMatches pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyErr_Format pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyFloat_FromDouble pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyErr_Occurred pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyEval_InitThreads pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyErr_SetObject pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyString_FromString pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyInt_FromLong pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyDict_GetItem pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyErr_Restore pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyInt_AsLong pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyCObject_AsVoidPtr pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyObject_Init pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyGILState_Ensure pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyErr_NormalizeException pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyObject_CallObject pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyObject_Malloc pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyErr_Fetch pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyObject_GetAttrString pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyObject_SetAttrString pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyErr_NewException pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyErr_Print pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyImport_ImportModule pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyThread_create_key pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyTuple_GetItem pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyErr_SetString pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyDict_SetItem pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyObject_Repr pygobject2.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 PyDict_New pygobject2.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 pygobject2.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 /lib64/librt.so.1 pygobject2.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libpyglib-2.0-python.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libffi.so.5 pygobject2.x86_64: W:
[Bug 226203] Merge Review: nss_db
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226203 Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #4 from Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com 2010-09-28 12:20:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) In that case I will reopen it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574531] Review Request: python26-nose - The nose testing package for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574531 --- Comment #9 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2010-09-28 12:25:07 EDT --- *** Bug 606551 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606551] Review Request: python26-nose - A discovery-based unittest extension for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606551 BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Last Closed||2010-09-28 12:25:07 --- Comment #3 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2010-09-28 12:25:07 EDT --- Closing, since the other review has made better progress (574531). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 574531 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574531] Review Request: python26-nose - The nose testing package for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574531 BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wdier...@rackspace.com --- Comment #8 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2010-09-28 12:24:03 EDT --- I'll close the other review (606551), as this one actually has some traction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636947] Review Request: ding-libs - Ding is not Glib assorted utility libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636947 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(jhro...@redhat.co ||m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632189] Review Request: erlang-misultin - Erlang library for building fast lightweight HTTP(S) servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632189 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-28 13:30:27 EDT --- erlang-misultin-0.6.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update erlang-misultin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-misultin-0.6.1-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632186] Review Request: erlang-log4erl - A logger for erlang in the spirit of Log4J
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632186 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-28 13:32:30 EDT --- erlang-log4erl-0.9.0-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update erlang-log4erl'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-log4erl-0.9.0-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632190] Review Request: erlang-amf - Erlang Action Message Format Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632190 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-28 13:31:07 EDT --- erlang-amf-0-0.2.20100908git27329144.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update erlang-amf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-amf-0-0.2.20100908git27329144.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 628524] Review Request: festival-freebsoft-utils - A collection of utilities that enhance Festival with some useful features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628524 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-28 13:30:32 EDT --- festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update festival-freebsoft-utils'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 516287] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-Itself - Model editor for Config::Model
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516287 --- Comment #6 from David Hannequin david.hanneq...@gmail.com 2010-09-28 14:01:50 EDT --- Hi, The file was present on my machine but forgot to put it on bugzilla. Sorry for the delay Spec URL: http://hvad.fedorapeople.org/fedora/perl-Config-Model-Itself/perl-Config-Model-Itself.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.fedorapeople.org/fedora/perl-Config-Model-Itself/perl-Config-Model-Itself-1.215-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Config::Itself and its model files provide a model of Config:Model. Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 --- Comment #29 from David Hannequin david.hanneq...@gmail.com 2010-09-28 14:20:30 EDT --- Hi Michael, I fix it. Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606557] Review Request: python26-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python26
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606557 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|steve.tray...@cern.ch Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574531] Review Request: python26-nose - The nose testing package for the python26 EPEL5 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574531 Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2010-09-28 14:30:49 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python26-nose Short Description: The nose testing package for the python26 EPEL package Owners: dmalcolm Branches: el5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626605] Review Request: perl-MIME-Base32 - Encode data similar way like MIME::Base64 does
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626605 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-28 14:34:48 EDT --- perl-MIME-Base32-1.02a-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 626605] Review Request: perl-MIME-Base32 - Encode data similar way like MIME::Base64 does
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626605 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-MIME-Base32-1.02a-1.fc |perl-MIME-Base32-1.02a-1.el |12 |5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606557] Review Request: python26-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python26
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606557 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-09-28 14:50:55 EDT --- Review of python26-sqlalchemy. PASS: specfiles match: In fact no but python-sqlalchemy has set the precedent. PASS: source files match upstream: $ curl -s http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/S/SQLAlchemy/SQLAlchemy-0.5.8.tar.gz | md5sum - 11292211f2634151d240025d58791210 - [st...@bottom SPECS]$ md5sum ../SOURCES/SQLAlchemy-0.5.8.tar.gz 11292211f2634151d240025d58791210 ../SOURCES/SQLAlchemy-0.5.8.tar.gz PASS: package meets naming and versioning guidelines. PASS: spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently. PASS: dist tag is present. PASS: build root is correct. PASS: license field matches the actual license. MIT. Very clearly PASS: license is open source-compatible. PASS: license text included in package. FAIL: latest version is being packaged. PASS: BuildRequires are proper. PASS: compiler flags are appropriate. PASS: %clean is present. PASS: package builds in mock. epel5. PASS: package installs properly. IGNORE: debuginfo package looks complete. FAIL: rpmlint is silent. python26-sqlalchemy.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5.84- ['0.5.8-4.el5', '0.5.8-4'] FAIL: final provides and requires are sane $ rpm -qp --provides python26-sqlalchemy-0.5.8-4.el5.noarch.rpm python26-sqlalchemy = 0.5.8-4.el5 $ rpm -qp --requires python26-sqlalchemy-0.5.8-4.el5.noarch.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 In particular python(abi) = 2.6 is not present. PASS: %check is present and all tests pass: Hopefully we can get the python-nose tests in before release. Probably worth waiting if possible. PASS: no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. PASS: owns the directories it creates. PASS: doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. PASS: no duplicates in %files. PASS: file permissions are appropriate. PASS: scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page. PASS: code, not content. PASS: documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. PASS: %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. IGNORE: no headers. IGNORE: no pkgconfig files. NONE: no libtool .la droppings. IGNORE: desktop files valid and installed properly. FAILS: 1) 0.6.4 has been released recently is this a better choice. 2) The release number is missing from the changelog comment. 3) I think a python(abi) = 2.6 should be in the requires. COMMENTS: CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS is irrelevant on a noarch package and should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606557] Review Request: python26-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python26
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606557 --- Comment #2 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2010-09-28 15:41:45 EDT --- Thank you. I've made the requested changes: SPEC: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/python26-sqlalchemy.spec SRPMS: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/python26-sqlalchemy-0.6.4-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606557] Review Request: python26-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python26
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606557 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-09-28 15:52:16 EDT --- All seems pretty perfect to me. Approved. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574545] Review Request: python26-mysqldb : Interface to MySQL for python26 on EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574545 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|steve.tray...@cern.ch Flag||fedora-review? Bug 574545 depends on bug 574506, which changed state. Bug 574506 Summary: Review Request: python26-distribute - the Distribute fork of setuptools for the python26 EPEL5 package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574506 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574545] Review Request: python26-mysqldb : Interface to MySQL for python26 on EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574545 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636947] Review Request: ding-libs - Ding is not Glib assorted utility libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636947 Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(jhro...@redhat.co |fedora-review+ |m) | --- Comment #4 from Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com 2010-09-28 16:02:08 EDT --- Thank you, approved. Just one thing, which I'm sure you're aware of - this update needs to be coordinated with SSSD update as (for example) libcollection version in ding-libs is 0.6 and sssd currently requires 0.5.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606557] Review Request: python26-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python26
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606557 BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 606557] Review Request: python26-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python26
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606557 --- Comment #4 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2010-09-28 16:30:51 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python26-sqlalchemy Short Description: Modular and flexible ORM library for python26 Owners: derks Branches: el5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630179] Review Request: cloud - Cloud.com CloudStack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630179 --- Comment #4 from Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com 2010-09-28 16:51:42 EDT --- Our package also requires XMLRPC3-3.1 to work. I am updating the XMLRPC3 RPM in Fedora with the 3.1.3 sources and will post it here shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630179] Review Request: cloud - Cloud.com CloudStack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630179 --- Comment #5 from Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com 2010-09-28 16:52:50 EDT --- Done: http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/foss/fedora/proposed/xmlrpc3-3.1.3-1.src.rpm http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/foss/fedora/proposed/xmlrpc3.spec Updated specfiles for cloud package will follow soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638362] New: Review Request: mod_python26 - An embedded Python interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mod_python26 - An embedded Python interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638362 Summary: Review Request: mod_python26 - An embedded Python interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wdier...@rackspace.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mod_python26.spec SRPM URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mod_python26-3.3.1-11.fc13.src.rpm Description: Mod_python is a module that embeds the Python language interpreter within the server, allowing Apache handlers to be written in Python. Mod_python brings together the versatility of Python and the power of the Apache Web server for a considerable boost in flexibility and performance over the traditional CGI approach. This package is built against 'python26'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574545] Review Request: python26-mysqldb : Interface to MySQL for python26 on EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574545
--- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-09-28 17:20:16
EDT ---
Date:28th September 2010.
Package: python26-mysqldb-1.2.3c1-2.el5.src.rpm.
Review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574545
Koji:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2495183
[QUERY] specfiles match:
[PASS] source files match upstream:
$ md5sum MySQL-python-1.2.3c1.tar.gz ../SOURCES/MySQL-python-1.2.3c1.tar.gz
310dd856e439d070b59ece6dd7a0734d MySQL-python-1.2.3c1.tar.gz
310dd856e439d070b59ece6dd7a0734d ../SOURCES/MySQL-python-1.2.3c1.tar.gz
[FAIL] package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
I thing 1.2.3c inicates a 1.2.3 candidate so the release should be
a 0.N. However 1.2.3 is released now anyway.
[PASS] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently.
[PASS] dist tag is present.
[PASS] build root is correct.
[PASS] license field matches the actual license.
GPLv2
[PASS] license is open source-compatible.
[FAIL] license text included in package.
[FAIL] latest version is being packaged.
[FAIL] BuildRequires are proper.
[PASS] compiler flags are appropriate.
CFLAGS set correctly for a python package.
[PASS] %clean is present.
[PASS] package builds in mock.
[FAIL] rpmlint is silent.
[FAIL] final provides and requires are sane
[IGNORE] %check is present and all tests pass:
[PASS] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
[PASS] owns the directories it creates.
[PASS] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
[PASS] no duplicates in %files.
[FAIL] file permissions are appropriate.
See rpmlint messages.
[IGNORE] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page.
[PASS] code, not content.
[PASS] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
[PASS] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
[PASS] no headers.
[PASS] no pkgconfig files.
[PASS] no libtool .la droppings.
[INGORE] desktop files valid and installed properly.
RPMLINT:
+ python26-mysqldb.src: W: unexpanded-macro dependency
python26-devel = %{pyver} %{pyver}
This is just odd because of how pyver is defined above. Change
this and all the other %defines to be %global might hopefully fix this.
+ python26-mysqldb.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/_mysql.so _mysql.so()(64bit)
It provides '_mysql.so()(64bit)' This can be filtered out. I've
only recently started doing this and I think it is the correct thing
to do but nobody seems to do it.
+ python26-mysqldb.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/_mysql.so 0775L
Can this be fixed?
QUERY:
The tar ball is called MySQL-python*.tar.gz and the existing 2.4 package
is MySQL-python. For me it makes sense to make it obvious within
a OS release that this corresponds to the 2.4 package MySQL-python.
i.e can we consider renamaing the package as MySQL-python26?
FAIL:
+The file GPL has not been included as a doc file.
+There looks to be a 1.2.3 rather than 1.2.3c release can we update to that.
+The Requires explictly mention mysql as needed but this is pulled in any
anyway by the autogenerated libmysqlclient_r.so.15()(64bit) requirement
so can be removed. Can you check for mx as well if it is needed.
+ gcc nor Distutils is needed in BuildRequires since they will always
be there.
COMMENTS:
+ Use the %global for the defines.
+ The Source0 contain prdownloads, can the 'pr' be dropped.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net
+ You don't set a
%{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib(1)))}
and then make use of that in %files which is the more normall thing
to do rather than the /usr/%{_lib}. The prefix of '/usr/' certainly
should go somehow ideally.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630179] Review Request: cloud - Cloud.com CloudStack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630179 --- Comment #6 from Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com 2010-09-28 17:23:17 EDT --- Updated cloud.spec (same URI as posted in first comment) and cloud SRPM (new URI:) http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/foss/fedora/proposed/cloud-2.1.3-3.src.rpm http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/foss/fedora/proposed/cloud-2.1.3.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633215] Review Request: SimplyHTML - Application and a java component for rich text processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633215 --- Comment #2 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2010-09-28 17:22:20 EDT --- This fails to build in mock: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2495313 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633215] Review Request: SimplyHTML - Application and a java component for rich text processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633215 --- Comment #3 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2010-09-28 17:24:15 EDT --- Probably BuildRequires: ant missing, at least. I like to test my build requirements by issuing koji scratch builds: koji build --scratch dist-f14 /path/to/your/src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638362] Review Request: mod_python26 - An embedded Python interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638362 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|steve.tray...@cern.ch Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638362] Review Request: mod_python26 - An embedded Python interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638362
--- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-09-28 17:39:23
EDT ---
Hi,
Just some questions before proceeding more.
Why the Conflict with mod_python? At least it needs to documented
why it conflicts in the .spec file if it actually does.
But can it be made to not conflict?
/var/www/manual/mod/mod_python can presumably be moved with some
corresponding edits in the mod_python26.conf.
It looks like this file already does not enable mod_python26 , or if
installing along side mod_python causes problems then is it possible
to put all the mod_python26 httpd configuration inside a conditional
that checks if mod_python(24) has already been loaded.
And also:
Requires: httpd-mmn = %(cat %{_includedir}/httpd/.mmn || echo missing)
Seems a bit odd, can you explain?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638362] Review Request: mod_python26 - An embedded Python interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638362
--- Comment #2 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2010-09-28 17:58:13 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #1)
Why the Conflict with mod_python? At least it needs to documented
why it conflicts in the .spec file if it actually does.
This may have been an assumed conflict, and is how most packages are handled in
IUS (where this is porting from). I've removed it, and will test
mod_python/mod_python26 together.
/var/www/manual/mod/mod_python can presumably be moved with some
corresponding edits in the mod_python26.conf.
This is actually already being done in the spec/config.
And also:
Requires: httpd-mmn = %(cat %{_includedir}/httpd/.mmn || echo missing)
Seems a bit odd, can you explain?
This was inherited from the Fedora packages which do the same thing. It makes
the package require the version of http-mmn that it is built against (httpd
provides httpd-mmn). I.e.:
$ rpm -q --provides httpd | grep -i mmn
httpd-mmn = 20051115
Updated spec/srpm (I'll need to test mod_python/mod_python26 together though):
Spec URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mod_python26.spec
SRPM URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mod_python26-3.3.1-12.fc13.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638362] Review Request: mod_python26 - An embedded Python interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638362
--- Comment #3 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2010-09-28 18:11:59 EDT
---
Ah, right... the reason the 'Conflicts: mod_python' was added previously was
because the actual symbol itself is named the same ('python_module'). With
mod_python/mod_python26 installed:
# httpd -t
[Tue Sep 28 17:04:14 2010] [warn] module python_module is already loaded,
skipping
Syntax OK
Changing the name would require patching the source. Changing the name in
mod_python26.conf produces:
# httpd -t
httpd: Syntax error on line 210 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: Syntax error on
line 9 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/mod_python26.conf: Can't locate API module
structure `python26_module' in file /etc/httpd/modules/mod_python26.so:
/etc/httpd/modules/mod_python26.so: undefined symbol: python26_module
I'm not sure how involved it would be to patch mod_python26 sources to define
the symbol 'python26_module', but I will look into it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638362] Review Request: mod_python26 - An embedded Python interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638362 --- Comment #4 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2010-09-28 18:17:00 EDT --- It looks like it might not be that difficult to change the symbol name: $ grep -ri 'python_module' ./* | wc -l 45 That said, I would imagine the Apache directives would still conflict. For example, calling 'PythonOption' or other Apache directives provided by 'mod_python' and 'mod_python26' both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578024] Review Request: ingres - Relational DBMS Server and Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578024 --- Comment #30 from Jay Hankinson jeremy.hankin...@ingres.com 2010-09-28 18:35:06 EDT --- Matthias, Thanks for the update, I'm actually just about to update the build, addressing the issues you mentioned above. It's caused by building against Xerces 3.x. I very much appreciated the review offer, it would help even if it isn't official. RE: Getting sponsored, I do indeed need to post comments on other reviews, I was wanting to feel I understood things a little better first though. Mainly by getting this submission in reasonable shape first. I'm back on this now after a rather long absence so hopefully I can get things moving again. Thanks, Jay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638402] New: Review Request: haildb - A relational database in shared library form
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: haildb - A relational database in shared library form https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638402 Summary: Review Request: haildb - A relational database in shared library form Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wdier...@rackspace.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/haildb.spec SRPM URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/haildb-2.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: A relational database in shared library form. Not a SQL database, although you can use this library as the storage backend for a SQL database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638402] Review Request: haildb - A relational database in shared library form
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638402 --- Comment #2 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2010-09-28 18:52:39 EDT --- Correction, the bug reported upstream is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/haildb/+bug/612982 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638402] Review Request: haildb - A relational database in shared library form
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638402 --- Comment #1 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2010-09-28 18:50:36 EDT --- NOTE: The following rpmlint warning has been reported upstream: https://bugs.launchpad.net/haildb/+bug/649068 haildb.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libhaildb.so.2.1.0 e...@glibc_2.2.5 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459125] Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 Diogo Lima diogo@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||diogo@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Diogo Lima diogo@gmail.com 2010-09-28 19:00:35 EDT --- The OCC license is still the same except it is now find at http://www.opencascade.org/getocc/license/ , while the fedoraproject explanation (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Open_CASCADE_Technology_Public_License) points that the license is no longer available. I read the licensing and I don't see the problem, OCC license actually only requests that the modifications get sent back to original developers and that they get notified if you're making use of it for commercial purpose. Except for that you are free to use and share the OCC code. Using external repositories for OCC will not allow FreeCAD to be added to fedora and might not allow FC to be added to the external repository either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638419] New: Review Request: gnu-crypto (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnu-crypto (for cloud package in bug #630179) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638419 Summary: Review Request: gnu-crypto (for cloud package in bug #630179) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rud...@rudd-o.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Cloud.com CloudStack dependency -- FIRST PACKAGE, SEEKING SPONSOR http://download.cloud.com/foss/fedora/proposed/gnu-crypto-2.1.0-3.src.rpm http://download.cloud.com/foss/fedora/proposed/gnu-crypto.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638421] New: Review Request: log4j-extras (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: log4j-extras (for cloud package in bug #630179) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638421 Summary: Review Request: log4j-extras (for cloud package in bug #630179) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rud...@rudd-o.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Cloud.com CloudStack dependency -- FIRST PACKAGE, SEEKING SPONSOR http://download.cloud.com/foss/fedora/proposed/log4j-extras-1.0-2.src.rpm http://download.cloud.com/foss/fedora/proposed/log4j-extras.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638418] New: Review Request: ehcache (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ehcache (for cloud package in bug #630179) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638418 Summary: Review Request: ehcache (for cloud package in bug #630179) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rud...@rudd-o.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Cloud.com CloudStack dependency -- FIRST PACKAGE, SEEKING SPONSOR http://download.cloud.com/foss/fedora/proposed/ehcache-1.2.0.3-3.src.rpm http://download.cloud.com/foss/fedora/proposed/ehcache.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638419] Review Request: gnu-crypto (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638419 Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||630179 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638418] Review Request: ehcache (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638418 Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||630179 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638421] Review Request: log4j-extras (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638421 Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||630179 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638420] Review Request: google-gson (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638420 Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||630179 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638422] Review Request: xmlrpc3 update to 3.1.3 (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638422 Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||630179 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630179] Review Request: cloud - Cloud.com CloudStack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630179 Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||638418, 638419, 638420, ||638421, 638422 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638420] New: Review Request: google-gson (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: google-gson (for cloud package in bug #630179) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638420 Summary: Review Request: google-gson (for cloud package in bug #630179) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rud...@rudd-o.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Cloud.com CloudStack dependency -- FIRST PACKAGE, SEEKING SPONSOR http://download.cloud.com/foss/fedora/proposed/google-gson-1.5-1.src.rpm http://download.cloud.com/foss/fedora/proposed/google-gson.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638422] New: Review Request: xmlrpc3 update to 3.1.3 (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc3 update to 3.1.3 (for cloud package in bug #630179) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638422 Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc3 update to 3.1.3 (for cloud package in bug #630179) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rud...@rudd-o.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Cloud.com CloudStack dependency -- UPDATE TO DISTRO PACKAGE, SEEKING SPONSOR http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/foss/fedora/proposed/xmlrpc3-3.1.3-1.src.rpm http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/foss/fedora/proposed/xmlrpc3.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630179] Review Request: cloud - Cloud.com CloudStack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630179 --- Comment #7 from Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com 2010-09-28 19:43:28 EDT --- I've split the newly-packaged dependencies into five dependent bugs as requested by hicham in freenode/#fedora-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638418] Review Request: ehcache (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638418 Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638421] Review Request: log4j-extras (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638421 Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638419] Review Request: gnu-crypto (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638419 Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638420] Review Request: google-gson (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638420 Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638425] New: Review Request: nawk - The one true awk descended from UNIX V7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nawk - The one true awk descended from UNIX V7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638425 Summary: Review Request: nawk - The one true awk descended from UNIX V7 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmcki...@nexcess.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/nawk/nawk.spec SRPM URL: http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/nawk/nawk-20100523-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This is the version of awk described in The AWK Programming Language, by Al Aho, Brian Kernighan, and Peter Weinberger. (Addison-Wesley, 1988, ISBN 0-201-07981-X). [mmcki...@fedora13 SRPMS]$ rpmlint nawk-20100523-1.fc13.src.rpm nawk.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) awk - AK, awl, aw nawk.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US awk - AK, awl, aw 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [mmcki...@fedora13 SRPMS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595603] Review Request: ghc-hslogger - Haskell logging framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595603
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||needinfo?(lakshminaras2002@
||gmail.com)
--- Comment #36 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-09-28 20:19:46
EDT ---
Lakshmi, you need to set the fedora_cvs fedora to '?' when requesting.
('+' means it is done/ok.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615692] Review Request: ghc-gtk - Haskell gtk binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615692 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2010-09-28 20:24:03 EDT --- Thanks New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-gtk Short Description: Haskell gtk binding Owners: petersen Branches: f14 f13 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 578024] Review Request: ingres - Relational DBMS Server and Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578024 --- Comment #31 from Jay Hankinson jeremy.hankin...@ingres.com 2010-09-28 20:36:00 EDT --- New build uploaded SPEC: ftp://ftp.ingres.com/outgoing/hanje04/srpms/ingres.spec 8c980ce88268711e58e47660fb0a0700 SRPM: ftp://ftp.ingres.com/outgoing/hanje04/srpms/ingres-10.1.0-1.20100920svn3608.fc14.src.rpm 81d4f42048f76dedfb8f0671bc210083 Change Log * Mon Sep 20 2010 Jay Hankinson jeremy.hankin...@ingres.com 10.1.0-1 - Update source and version info for Ingres 10.1 @ svnrev 3608 - Add patch for building aginst Xerces 3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 636947] Review Request: ding-libs - Ding is not Glib assorted utility libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636947 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com 2010-09-28 20:34:07 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ding-libs Short Description: Ding is not Glib assorted utility libraries Owners: sgallagh dpal Branches: f13 f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571458] Review Request: sqlite36 - Library that implements an embeddable SQL database engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571458 BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||wdier...@rackspace.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wdier...@rackspace.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571458] Review Request: sqlite36 - Library that implements an embeddable SQL database engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571458
--- Comment #1 from BJ Dierkes wdier...@rackspace.com 2010-09-28 20:58:36 EDT
---
PASS: rpmlint run on every package:
$ rpmlint -i SPECS/sqlite36.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint -i
/var/lib/mock/epel-5-x86_64/result/sqlite36-3.6.22-2.el5.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint -i
/var/lib/mock/epel-5-x86_64/result/sqlite36-devel-3.6.22-2.el5.x86_64.rpm
sqlite36-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
---
PASS: package is named according to guidelines (exception, multi-version pkg)
PASS: spec file name matches base name (sqlite36.spec)
---
FAIL: package does not fully meet guidelines reqarding Tcl extensions:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Tcl
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Tcl#Naming_Conventions
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Tcl#arch-specific_packages
---
PASS: package is licensed with an approved license (Public Domain)
PASS: spec file is written in American English
PASS: spec file is legible
---
PASS: sources match upstream:
Source0: http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite-%{version}.tar.gz
Source1: http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite_docs_%{docver}.zip
$ curl -s http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite-3.6.22.tar.gz | md5sum ; md5sum
SOURCES/sqlite-3.6.22.tar.gz
a17bd53f1fde11f84adf79c6a1510ce5 -
a17bd53f1fde11f84adf79c6a1510ce5 SOURCES/sqlite-3.6.22.tar.gz
$ curl -s http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite_docs_3_6_22.zip | md5sum ; md5sum
SOURCES/sqlite_docs_3_6_22.zip
665889e9de50136514aa267173066e96 -
665889e9de50136514aa267173066e96 SOURCES/sqlite_docs_3_6_22.zip
---
PASS: package successfully compiles on atleast one primary arch (el5-x86_64)
PASS: all build dependencies are listed
PASS: spec file handles locales properly (no locale files)
PASS: ldconfig is called in %post/%postun
PASS: package does not bundle copes of system libraries
PASS: package owns all directories it creates (none)
PASS: files are not listed more than once
PASS: permissions on files are set properly
PASS: header files are in -devel
PASS: doc files are in -doc
PASS: no static files to package in -static
PASS: library files are packages under base, .so without suffix under -devel
PASS: -devel package requires base package
PASS: package does not include any .la/.a files
PASS: package does not own files/directories already owned by other packages
PASS: all file names are UTF-8
---
: license file not included in source, should request upstream include it.
PASS: the package builds in mock
PASS: software functions as expected (calling sqlite36)
: -doc sub package does not require base package
PASS: pkgconfig files are packages under -devel
---
Summary: Looks mostly good:
FAIL: package does not fully meet guidelines reqarding Tcl extensions. See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Tcl
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Tcl#Naming_Conventions
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Tcl#arch-specific_packages
: License file is not included in source... SHOULD request that upstream
includes it.
: The -doc subpackage doesn't require the base package. Up to you if you
want to change that, its not a MUST.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638418] Review Request: ehcache (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638418 --- Comment #1 from Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com 2010-09-28 21:00:05 EDT --- Fixed rpmlint warnings: (the source URL cannot be fixed because the... not so clever release managers at ehcache decided not to include any build system in the sources they release. so I basically ship with the same source as the JPP project) http://download.cloud.com/foss/fedora/proposed/ehcache-1.2.0.3-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638422] Feature Request: xmlrpc3 update to 3.1.3 (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638422 Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: xmlrpc3 |Feature Request: xmlrpc3 |update to 3.1.3 (for cloud |update to 3.1.3 (for cloud |package in bug #630179) |package in bug #630179) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638419] Review Request: gnu-crypto (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638419 --- Comment #1 from Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com 2010-09-28 21:22:18 EDT --- Fixed rpmlint warnings http://download.cloud.com/foss/fedora/proposed/gnu-crypto-2.1.0-4.src.rpm http://download.cloud.com/foss/fedora/proposed/gnu-crypto.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 490940] Review Request: mod_pubcookie - A solution for single sign-on authentication to websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490940 Gabriel Somlo so...@cmu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: pubcookie - |Review Request: |Open-source software for|mod_pubcookie - A solution |intra-institutional web |for single sign-on |authentication |authentication to websites Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638421] Review Request: log4j-extras (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638421 --- Comment #1 from Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com 2010-09-28 21:24:44 EDT --- Fixed rpmlint warnings: http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/foss/fedora/proposed/log4j-extras-1.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638422] Feature Request: xmlrpc3 update to 3.1.3 (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638422 --- Comment #1 from Rudd-O DragonFear rud...@rudd-o.com 2010-09-28 21:27:26 EDT --- This bug ought to be closed and superseded by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638439 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
