[Bug 620112] Review Request: udpxy - UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620112 Ivan Afonichev ivan.afonic...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #26 from Ivan Afonichev ivan.afonic...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 02:17:42 EDT --- Ok I think it's time to make an SCM admin request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 721179] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721179 --- Comment #20 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-07-29 02:27:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) for #3, do we still need ruby subpackages from rubygems anymore? What is the policy on this? We can ditch it if not needed, I certainly don't. It is opposite, the ruby- subpackage requires the rubygem- package. The ruby- subpackage was never mandatory. The idea was to use libraries provided as rubygem without rubygems, but the design was wrong from begin IMO. For the rest, I will fix accordingly, for the BuildRoot can be dropped, but if this .spec wants to be shared with EPEL we'll still need it then? Yes, you need BuildRoot for EPEL5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707132] Review Request: java-service-wrapper - Java service wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707132 --- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2011-07-29 02:52:54 EDT --- Updated: SRC.RPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/java-service-wrapper/java-service-wrapper-3.2.5-2.fc15.src.rpm SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/java-service-wrapper/java-service-wrapper.spec Sorry that it took me so long time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725837] Review Request: hexglass - Block falling puzzle game based on a hexagonal grid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725837 --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-07-29 03:01:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/hexglass/hexglass.spec SRPM URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/hexglass/hexglass-1.2.1-2.fc15.src.rpm A few minor changes: - added Group field - changed GenericName in .desktop file to Block falling game -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724878] Review Request: TexStudio - A feature-rich editor for LaTeX documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724878 --- Comment #7 from hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com 2011-07-29 03:09:50 EDT --- Alright filed [1] SPEC-URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/texstudio.spec SRPM-URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/texstudio-2.2-3.fc15.src.rpm Fixed all your notes. Thanks a lot for your helpful comments! [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/100 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725888] Review Request: drupal6-strongarm - Strongarm gives a way to override the default variable values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725888 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-29 03:45:03 EDT --- drupal6-strongarm-2.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-strongarm-2.0-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725888] Review Request: drupal6-strongarm - Strongarm gives a way to override the default variable values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725888 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-29 03:47:37 EDT --- drupal6-strongarm-2.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-strongarm-2.0-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725888] Review Request: drupal6-strongarm - Strongarm gives a way to override the default variable values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725888 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705363] Review Request: spacewalk-web - Spacewalk Web site packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705363 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-07-29 03:52:09 EDT --- TODO: spacewalk-html subpackage contains MIT licensed code (html/javascript/controls.js, http://madrobby.github.com/scriptaculous/license/). Add proper value to License tag for this subpackage. Actually the javascript code is in separate files. The MIT code does not combine with GPL code until it reaches client web browser, so the MIT code is not infected by GPL code in source nor binary RPM package. Thus I conclude adding `MIT' to package license tag is a must. Thus: FIX: Add MIT to license tag of spacewalk-html sub-package. And yet another problem. The Perl modules are installed into global Perl vendor directory, thus they are accessible by any other Perl programs. Also your Perl modules contain tests and other Perl infrastructure that is not utilized by your spec file. In other words the Perl modules seem to be bundled to spacewalk-web source tar ball and thus should be packaged as standalone RPM packages (with running tests) by standalone SPEC files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725888] Review Request: drupal6-strongarm - Strongarm gives a way to override the default variable values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725888 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-29 03:53:54 EDT --- drupal6-strongarm-2.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-strongarm-2.0-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725888] Review Request: drupal6-strongarm - Strongarm gives a way to override the default variable values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725888 Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-07-29 03:57:20 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702103] Review Request: python-osmgpsmap - Python bindings for osm-gps-map GTK+ widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702103 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726486] Review Request: verne-backgrounds - Verne desktop backgrounds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726486 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-29 04:06:35 EDT --- desktop-backgrounds-16.0.0-1.fc16,verne-backgrounds-15.91.0-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/desktop-backgrounds-16.0.0-1.fc16,verne-backgrounds-15.91.0-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724924] Review Request: cookcc - Lexer and Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724924 Bug 724924 depends on bug 724914, which changed state. Bug 724914 Summary: Review Request: cookxml - Dynamic XML data binding tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724914 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724914] Review Request: cookxml - Dynamic XML data binding tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724914 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-07-29 04:08:02 --- Comment #8 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2011-07-29 04:08:02 EDT --- Thank you, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726486] Review Request: verne-backgrounds - Verne desktop backgrounds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726486 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711848] Review Request: kmetronome - KDE MIDI Metronome using ALSA Sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711848 --- Comment #7 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 04:18:30 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/kmetronome.spec SRPM URL: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/kmetronome-0.10.0-2.fc15.src.rpm Changes: - Add kde4-macros(api) requirement - BR: gettext and desktop-file-utils added, alsa-lib-devel removed - Check the desktop entry file - Drop explicit %%doc tag from the manpage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720807] Review Request: askbot-plugin-authfas - Askbot plugin to facilitate FAS authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720807 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-07-29 05:14:12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 724924] Review Request: cookcc - Lexer and Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724924 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-07-29 05:15:59 EDT --- Please add a javadoc subpackage before the review. It should be a fairly easy ant target and you might send it upstream too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656186] Review Request: drupal6-mimedetect - MimeDetect provides an API for consistent server side mime detection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656186 --- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2011-07-29 06:14:33 EDT --- Are you still interested in this package? You haven't requested SCM so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570862] Review Request: drupal6-securepages - Redirect the required pages to a SSL version of the page
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570862 --- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2011-07-29 06:17:23 EDT --- Are you still interested in this package? If not, we should probably label the review stalled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726044] Review Request: jboss-logmanager - JBoss Log Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726044
Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-07-29
06:43:13 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
jboss-logmanager-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Javadocs -
Java docs, Java-docs, Avocados
./jboss-logmanager.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
jboss-logmanager-1.2.0.GA.tar.xz
OK
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type:LGPLv2+
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[x] If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven.local.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608319] Review Request: memaker - An avatar creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608319 --- Comment #13 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 06:45:19 EDT --- Thank you for the review Mario! I'll remove the %defattr etc when I push it to scm. Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608319] Review Request: memaker - An avatar creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608319 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 06:53:30 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: memaker Short Description: An avatar creator Owners: ankursinha Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680666] Review Request: rssdler - A utility to automatically download enclosures and other objects linked to from various types of RSS feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680666 --- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 06:55:18 EDT --- Thanks for the review :D I'll make these minor tweaks when I push to scm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680666] Review Request: rssdler - A utility to automatically download enclosures and other objects linked to from various types of RSS feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680666 --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 06:56:17 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rssdler Short Description: A utility to automatically download enclosures and other objects linked to from various types of RSS feeds Owners: ankursinha Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656186] Review Request: drupal6-mimedetect - MimeDetect provides an API for consistent server side mime detection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656186 --- Comment #6 from Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 07:10:31 EDT --- It seems, yes, I am, just we're working on our basic features and this is not part of that. I think we'll use this one when we'll be working on the podcast ideas. Thank you for the reminder. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705363] Review Request: spacewalk-web - Spacewalk Web site packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705363 --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2011-07-29 07:30:14 EDT --- SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-web/spacewalk-web.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-web/spacewalk-web-1.6.6-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705363] Review Request: spacewalk-web - Spacewalk Web site packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705363
--- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2011-07-29 07:26:12 EDT
---
TODO: I think `Spacewalk web site' or `Spacewalk web interface' would be
enough. The word (Spacewalk) `packages' interfere with RPM packages.
fixed
TODO: spacewalk-html subpackage contains MIT licensed code
fixed
TODO: spacewalk-base-minimal summary is too cryptic. Replace .pm's with
`Perl
modules' or make it more human-friendly in other way.
fixed
TODO: spacewalk-web package summary contains lower-case `rpm' abbreviation.
Use
upper case.
fixed
TODO: Some package descriptions do not end with full stop.
fixed
TODO: Remove BuildRoot definition and it's cleaning as it's default behavior
of
rpmbuild.
Negative sir. We still care about EPEL4, where we need it.
FIX: Add Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version)) too all subpackages with Perl modules
fixed
TODO: Add %{?_smp_mflags} to make arguments to utilize all CPU's while
`compiling'.
fixed
TODO: Remove %defattr macro from %files sections as this is implicit.
fixed
FIX: Escape percentage symbol in changelog, otherwise it's subject of
SPEC-macro expansion.
fixed
Notice: Is /var/www/html/network/software/channels/keys/BETA-RPM-GPG-KEY a GPG
key stored along web pages? Should it be a %config file? I don't like it.
Dead files. Removed.
Also your Perl modules contain tests and other Perl infrastructure that is
not utilized by your spec file.
That is because that those tests are not maintained for ages and very probably
do not work.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726044] Review Request: jboss-logmanager - JBoss Log Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726044 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608319] Review Request: memaker - An avatar creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608319 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-29 07:57:51 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 430603] Review Request: clex - A free file manager with a full-screen user interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430603 --- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-29 07:57:09 EDT --- Unretired, take ownership in pkgdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708842] Review Request: jansi - Jansi is a java library for generating and interpreting ANSI escape sequences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708842 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||akurt...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-07-29 07:55:43 EDT --- I would do this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620112] Review Request: udpxy - UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620112 --- Comment #28 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-29 07:59:08 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725200] Review Request: raptor2 - RDF Parser Toolkit for Redland
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725200 --- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-29 08:02:41 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675009] Review Request: c3p0 - JDBC DataSources/Resource Pools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675009 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@jcomserv.net, ||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-29 08:02:06 EDT --- Is this name ok from a legal perspective? CCing Spot, can you have a look, please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 708842] Review Request: jansi - Jansi is a java library for generating and interpreting ANSI escape sequences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708842
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-07-29
08:05:39 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
jansi.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Jansi is a java library for
generating and interpreting ANSI escape sequences.
Please fix
jansi.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Jansi
Just skipping Jansi is a from the beginning
jansi-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Javadocs - Java docs,
Java-docs, Avocados
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: ASL 2.0
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[!] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
Javadoc is missing it
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[-] Package uses %global not %define
[x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[!] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven.local.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[!] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[!] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[!] Latest version is packaged.
1.6 is out
=== Issues ===
1. Rpmlint warnings
2. Missing license in the javadoc subpackage
3. Use the new add_maven_depmap macro
4. Remove update_maven_depmap and Requires(post|postun) on jpackage=utils
5. Update to version 1.6.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680666] Review Request: rssdler - A utility to automatically download enclosures and other objects linked to from various types of RSS feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680666 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 680666] Review Request: rssdler - A utility to automatically download enclosures and other objects linked to from various types of RSS feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680666 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-29 08:29:13 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707199] Review Request: openstack-nova - OpenStack Compute (nova)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707199 Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mar...@redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com 2011-07-29 08:33:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Created attachment 510531 [details] spec file patch My suggestions for how to fix many of the items in the above review. Matt, I took the liberty of splitting your patch up: https://github.com/markmc/openstack-fedora-specs Perhaps that'll make it easier for Oleg and co to accept the changes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693231] Review Request: gedit-collaboration - collaboration plugin for gedit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693231 Bug 693231 depends on bug 693199, which changed state. Bug 693199 Summary: Please update libinfinity to 0.5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693199 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705363] Review Request: spacewalk-web - Spacewalk Web site packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705363 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|ppi...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-07-29 08:47:24 EDT --- Thanks for quick response, but this is rebase and I'm leaving in one hour for two-week vacations. Ask mmasl...@redhat.com or psab...@redhat.com to finish this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707199] Review Request: openstack-nova - OpenStack Compute (nova)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707199 --- Comment #12 from Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com 2011-07-29 08:49:15 EDT --- Some of the things Matt listed that still need sorting: - correct the version to reflect this is a bzr snapshot - DB migration shouldn't be in %post Some other things that need sorting: - does the nova user/group need registering? I've forgotten the policy - there shouldn't be a warning about SELinux being enabled in %post - shouldn't be modifying sudoers in %post - the package requires openstack-glance and openstack-client, neither of which are packaged AFAICS - the cc-config and compute-config packages are used to package two different versions of nova.conf. I think the base nova package needs a nova.conf and further configuration should be left to the admin - the initscripts use start-stop-daemon, whereas we'd use the daemon function in Fedora. We should fix that rather than packaging start-stop-daemon. Also, perhaps we'd be better jumping straight to systemd rather than using sysvinit - nitpicky perhaps, but someone else could take over this spec and submit it, if we got confirmation from the mirantis and griddynamics that they are happy for their work to be contributed under the FPCA (e.g. they could license the spec under MIT) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711848] Review Request: kmetronome - KDE MIDI Metronome using ALSA Sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711848
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|martin.giesek...@uos.de
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-07-29
08:53:46 EDT ---
The package looks almost fine. There are just two things left to be fixed:
- correct the typo in %prep: drumstikc/ - drumstick/
- add the missing scriptlets to update the icon cache:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
$ rpmlint kmetronome-*.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
- GPLv2+ according to source file headers
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum kmetronome-0.10.0.tar.bz2*
af52c1179f4c27496bb67e965be3931e kmetronome-0.10.0.tar.bz2
af52c1179f4c27496bb67e965be3931e kmetronome-0.10.0.tar.bz2.1
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[+] MUST: When compiling C, C++, or Fortran files, %{optflags} must be applied.
[+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[X] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file.
[+] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
EPEL = 5 only:
[X] MUST: The spec file must contain a valid BuildRoot field.
[X] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot}.
[X] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot}.
[.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[+] SHOULD: All patches should be commented in the spec file
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
[.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
[.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg.
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring
[Bug 711547] Review Request: sketch - Free Graphics Software for the TeX, LaTeX, and PSTricks Community
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547 --- Comment #24 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 09:23:12 EDT --- We'll all I can tell you is to be patient... I had to learn that the hard way as well :) It can be frustrating when you're excited about becoming a contributor and things seem to be moving at a snail's pace. Richard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726690] New: Review Request: compat-rubygem-rails - rails 2 alongside rails 3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: compat-rubygem-rails - rails 2 alongside rails 3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726690 Summary: Review Request: compat-rubygem-rails - rails 2 alongside rails 3 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: codehot...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://xls01.freecult.org/SPECS/ SRPM URL: http://xls01.freecult.org/SRPMS/ A dependency of rails 2.3.12 is rubygem-rdoc which is in Fedora 16. I tested with the following (S)RPM and experienced no problems: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=254306 Details: Although Rails 3 was released, there are still rails projects working with rails 2.3 series. Rails 3 is not backwards compatible and some key features are not yet working in Rails 3. One notable project still on rails 2.3 is the issue tracker redmine http://www.redmine.org Since rails 2 and rails 3 are perfectly parallel installable, I would like to maintain rails 2.3 series in Fedora until it really becomes obsolete. This is my first package for Fedora and I've probably made a lot of silly mistakes. I'm welcoming feedback! Thank you for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726690] Review Request: compat-rubygem-rails - rails 2 alongside rails 3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726690 Emanuel Rietveld codehot...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675009] Review Request: c3p0 - JDBC DataSources/Resource Pools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675009 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #21 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2011-07-29 10:14:03 EDT --- Looks okay, I don't see any trademarks in the same field. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675009] Review Request: c3p0 - JDBC DataSources/Resource Pools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675009 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-29 10:25:33 EDT --- Thanks, better safe than sorry. I'm setting the cvs flag again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620112] Review Request: udpxy - UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620112 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-29 10:26:47 EDT --- udpxy-1.0.20-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/udpxy-1.0.20-1.fc15 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-29 10:26:47 EDT --- udpxy-1.0.20-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/udpxy-1.0.20-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620112] Review Request: udpxy - UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620112 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675009] Review Request: c3p0 - JDBC DataSources/Resource Pools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675009 --- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-29 10:26:34 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620112] Review Request: udpxy - UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620112 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-29 10:26:47 EDT --- udpxy-1.0.20-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/udpxy-1.0.20-1.fc15 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-29 10:26:47 EDT --- udpxy-1.0.20-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/udpxy-1.0.20-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711848] Review Request: kmetronome - KDE MIDI Metronome using ALSA Sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711848 --- Comment #9 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 10:59:19 EDT --- Thanks! Spec URL: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/kmetronome.spec SRPM URL: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/kmetronome-0.10.0-3.fc15.src.rpm Changes: - Fix a typo - Add scriptlets to update the icon cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711848] Review Request: kmetronome - KDE MIDI Metronome using ALSA Sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711848 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-07-29 11:12:44 EDT --- OK, the package is ready now. Package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711848] Review Request: kmetronome - KDE MIDI Metronome using ALSA Sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711848 Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 11:27:40 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kmetronome Short Description: KDE MIDI Metronome using ALSA Sequencer Owners: cheeselee Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711848] Review Request: kmetronome - KDE MIDI Metronome using ALSA Sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711848 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-29 11:34:22 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725905] Review Request: p11-kit - Library for loading and sharing PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905 --- Comment #10 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 11:43:10 EDT --- * Fri Jul 29 2011 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com - 0.3-1 - Update to 0.3 - Upstream rewrote the ASL 2.0 bits, which makes the whole package BSD-licensed Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/p11-kit.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/p11-kit-0.3-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711848] Review Request: kmetronome - KDE MIDI Metronome using ALSA Sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711848 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-29 12:10:10 EDT --- kmetronome-0.10.0-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kmetronome-0.10.0-3.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711848] Review Request: kmetronome - KDE MIDI Metronome using ALSA Sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711848 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725552] Review Request: python-confparser - A KISS parse to *nix config files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725552 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-29 12:13:59 EDT --- python-confparser-1.0.0-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-confparser-1.0.0-3.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725552] Review Request: python-confparser - A KISS parse to *nix config files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725552 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-29 12:23:08 EDT --- python-confparser-1.0.0-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-confparser-1.0.0-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725552] Review Request: python-confparser - A KISS parse to *nix config files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725552 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-29 12:23:50 EDT --- python-confparser-1.0.0-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-confparser-1.0.0-3.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726080] Review Request: Xnee - X11 environment recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726080 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-07-29 12:45:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Yes, my SPEC file is for xnee. I will package libxnee, cnee and gnee from the tarball... If you agree. Yes, that would be fine. However, you don't need create a separate spec for that. Just build everything from the spec file of xnee (shared libxnee, cnee, and gnee,...) and put the various files into different subpackages, e.g.: xnee (base package): main applications + corresponding data (image files, etc.) libxnee: shared library files libxnee.so.* libxnee-devel: header files and libxnee.so The static libxnee library should not be built, linked and packaged except there are good reasons for it. Fedora usually provides shared libraries only. You can drop the scriptlets again, because - you only have to update the icon cache if something is installed below /usr/share/icons. - there's no MimeType entry in the .desktop file = no need to run update-desktop-database - the package doesn't install a mimeinfo file = no need to run update-mime-database -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 570862] Review Request: drupal6-securepages - Redirect the required pages to a SSL version of the page
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570862 --- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-07-29 12:47:26 EDT --- Sorry, fell off the radar. http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/drupal6-securepages.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/drupal6-securepages-1.9-1.fc15.src.rpm * Fri Jul 29 2011 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com - 1.9-1 - Update to 1.9 - Change license to GPLv2+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675009] Review Request: c3p0 - JDBC DataSources/Resource Pools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675009 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-29 12:52:22 EDT --- c3p0-0.9.2-0.5.pre1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/c3p0-0.9.2-0.5.pre1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675009] Review Request: c3p0 - JDBC DataSources/Resource Pools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675009 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688499] Review Request: cabal-dev - Haskell package sandboxing tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688499
--- Comment #8 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-07-29
14:17:36 EDT ---
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
cabal-dev.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) sandboxing - sand boxing,
sand-boxing, sandbagging
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
cabal-dev.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sandboxed - sandboxes,
sand boxed, sand-boxed
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
cabal-dev.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ghc - chg
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
cabal-dev.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) sandboxing - sand boxing,
sand-boxing, sandbagging
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
cabal-dev.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sandboxed -
sandboxes, sand boxed, sand-boxed
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
cabal-dev.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ghc - chg
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
cabal-dev.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cabal-dev
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
cabal-dev.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fake-ghc-cabal-dev
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.
[+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Naming-Yes
Version-release - Matches
License - OK
No prebuilt external bits - OK
Spec legibity - OK
Package template - OK
Arch support - OK
Libexecdir - OK
rpmlint - yes
changelogs - OK
Source url tag - OK, validated.
Build Requires list - OK
Summary and description - OK
API documentation - OK
[+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
[+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
LICENSE file is included.
[+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
md5sum cabal-dev-0.8-2.fc15.src/cabal-dev-0.8.tar.gz
d6f39a18cb7427089f9d3e704c440409 cabal-dev-0.8-2.fc15.src/cabal-dev-0.8.tar.gz
md5sum ~/Downloads/cabal-dev-0.8.tar.gz
d6f39a18cb7427089f9d3e704c440409
/home/narasimhan/Downloads/cabal-dev-0.8.tar.gz
[+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Built on x86_64.
[+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[NA]MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly using the %find_lang macro
[NA]MUST: Packages stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun.
[+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
Checked with rpmquery --list.
[NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review.
[+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides
[+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
Checked with ls -lR
[+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
Contains 00index.tar. However the tar seems to be empty.
[+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+]MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[NA]MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[NA]MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix
(e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must
go in a -devel package.
[NA]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release}
[NA]MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la
[Bug 700427] Review Request: jopt-simple - A Java command line parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700427
--- Comment #9 from Karel Klíč kk...@redhat.com 2011-07-29 15:21:04 EDT ---
Yes, I am, thanks. I have checked that this version can be built in Rawhide and
F-15.
Spec URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/jopt-simple.spec
SRPM URL: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/jopt-simple-3.3-2.fc15.src.rpm
* Fri Jul 29 2011 Karel Klíč kk...@redhat.com - 3.3-2
- Use %%{_mavenpomdir} instead of %%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
- Removed %%post(un) %%update_maven_depmap calls, not needed in F-15+
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725837] Review Request: hexglass - Block falling puzzle game based on a hexagonal grid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725837
Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-07-29 15:24:48
EDT ---
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3237950
$ rpmlint -i -v *
hexglass.i686: I: checking
hexglass.i686: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/hexglass (timeout 10
seconds)
hexglass.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary hexglass
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
hexglass.src: I: checking
hexglass.src: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/hexglass (timeout 10
seconds)
hexglass.src: I: checking-url
http://hexglass.googlecode.com/files/hexglass-1.2.1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds)
hexglass.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://hexglass.googlecode.com/files/hexglass-1.2.1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not
Found
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
hexglass.x86_64: I: checking
hexglass.x86_64: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/hexglass (timeout 10
seconds)
hexglass.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary hexglass
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
hexglass-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
hexglass-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/hexglass
(timeout 10 seconds)
hexglass-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
hexglass-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/hexglass
(timeout 10 seconds)
hexglass.spec: I: checking-url
http://hexglass.googlecode.com/files/hexglass-1.2.1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds)
hexglass.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://hexglass.googlecode.com/files/hexglass-1.2.1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not
Found
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
Googlecode fails again with the download. No problem, the source package is
available, though.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
GPLv3+
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum *
408148e6b05065d12edd7066b929465b hexglass-1.2.1.tar.gz
408148e6b05065d12edd7066b929465b hexglass-1.2.1.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- See Koji build above.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[+] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[+] MUST: .desktop files must be
[Bug 725837] Review Request: hexglass - Block falling puzzle game based on a hexagonal grid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725837 --- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-07-29 15:32:26 EDT --- BTW, what about to add a German summary and description? Summary(de):Puzzlespiel mit fallenden Blöcken in einem sechseckigen Raster %description -l de HexGlass ist ein Tetris-ähnliches Puzzlespiel. Zehn verschiedene Blocktypen fallen fortwährend nach unten und müssen so angeordnet werden, dass horizontale Zeilen aus sechseckigen Elementen gebildet werden. Durch Vervollständigen einer Zeile verschwinden die Blöcke, wodurch die übrigen nach unten verschoben werden. Mit steigendem Schwierigkeitsgrad fallen die Blöcke schneller. Das Spiel ist vorbei, sobald das Spielfeld vollständig gefüllt ist und keine Blöcke mehr fallen können. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 723427] Review Request: jinput - Java Game Controller API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723427 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||loganje...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 15:32:37 EDT --- This package suffers from this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633501 I see the same compiler warning and the same undefined symbol when building in Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725837] Review Request: hexglass - Block falling puzzle game based on a hexagonal grid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725837 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-07-29 16:08:39 EDT --- Mario, thank you for the review and the German translations. I'll add them before checking in the package. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: hexglass Short Description: Block falling puzzle game based on a hexagonal grid Owners: mgieseki Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652085] Review Request: SFML - A simple and fast multimedia library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085 --- Comment #10 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 17:21:23 EDT --- sorry i have miss your message, currently i works on ldc 2 so i think is better wait ldc 2 (D2) is done and after continuing D packaging -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725200] Review Request: raptor2 - RDF Parser Toolkit for Redland
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725200 --- Comment #23 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-07-29 17:52:08 EDT --- imported -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725200] Review Request: raptor2 - RDF Parser Toolkit for Redland
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725200 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|726507 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591428] Review Request: R-tweedie - Tweedie exponential family models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591428 Bug 591428 depends on bug 591424, which changed state. Bug 591424 Summary: Review Request: R-statmod - Statistical modeling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591424 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|NEW |CLOSED Bug 591428 depends on bug 591421, which changed state. Bug 591421 Summary: Review Request: R-fBasics - Rmetrics - markets and basic statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591421 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591421] Review Request: R-fBasics - Rmetrics - markets and basic statistics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591421 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-07-29 18:10:57 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-07-29 18:10:57 EDT --- Pretty sure this (and everything further down in the dependency tree) needs to be closed since one of the dependencies was closed due to non-response (and still has legal issues in any case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591421] Review Request: R-fBasics - Rmetrics - markets and basic statistics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591421 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591428] Review Request: R-tweedie - Tweedie exponential family models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591428 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-07-29 18:11:30 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-07-29 18:11:30 EDT --- Closing due to closure of dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726841] Re-Review Request for Rename: python-mx - renaming mx
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726841 Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=497471 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725200] Review Request: raptor2 - RDF Parser Toolkit for Redland
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725200 Dave Beckett d...@dajobe.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@dajobe.org --- Comment #24 from Dave Beckett d...@dajobe.org 2011-07-29 19:34:43 EDT --- Hey folks - upstream author here. Just to note raptor2 2.0.4 was released with the curl header fix. Let me know anything I need to do/merge upstream. Cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725200] Review Request: raptor2 - RDF Parser Toolkit for Redland
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725200 --- Comment #25 from Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 20:20:52 EDT --- Hi Dave, there is only this patch Rex made to make raptor2 docs paralelly installable with raptor(1) docs: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=raptor2.git;a=blob_plain;f=raptor2-2.0.3-raptor2_doc.patch;hb=c4984f6edd0ee2eb82ae7d6e07d8edfaa6f4ed75 Dave, you can always find our patches at http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=raptor2.git or http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=redland.git etc. But we'll try to let you know in advance when we do something nontrivial. Also, thank you Rex for taking care of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726841] Re-Review Request for Rename: python-mx - renaming mx
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726841
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi
QAContact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |jussi.leht...@iki.fi
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2011-07-29 20:41:09
EDT ---
$ rpmlint python-mx-*
python-mx.src: W: strange-permission egenix-mx-base-3.2.0.tar.gz 0444L
python-mx.src: E: invalid-spec-name
python-mx.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-provides mx
python-mx.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes mx
python-mx.src:32: W: unversioned-explicit-provides mx-devel
python-mx.src:33: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes mx-devel
python-mx.src:82: W: macro-in-comment %{_bindir}
python-mx.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion mx obsoletes mx
python-mx.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion mx2 = 3.2.0-2.fc15 obsoletes mx2 =
3.2.0-2.fc15
python-mx.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/Proxy/mxProxy/mxProxy.so
mxProxy.so()(64bit)
python-mx.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/Queue/mxQueue/mxQueue.so
mxQueue.so()(64bit)
python-mx.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/TextTools/mxTextTools/mxTextTools.so
mxTextTools.so()(64bit)
python-mx.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/UID/mxUID/mxUID.so mxUID.so()(64bit)
python-mx.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/URL/mxURL/mxURL.so mxURL.so()(64bit)
python-mx.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/BeeBase/mxBeeBase/mxBeeBase.so
mxBeeBase.so()(64bit)
python-mx.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/DateTime/mxDateTime/mxDateTime.so
mxDateTime.so()(64bit)
python-mx.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/Stack/mxStack/mxStack.so
mxStack.so()(64bit)
python-mx.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/Tools/mxTools/mxTools.so
mxTools.so()(64bit)
python-mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/Proxy/mxProxy/mxProxy.so 0775L
python-mx.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/BeeBase/showBeeDict.pyo
python-mx.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/BeeBase/showBeeDict.pyc
python-mx.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/TextTools/mxTextTools/testkj.pyc
python-mx.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/TextTools/mxTextTools/testkj.pyo
python-mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/Queue/mxQueue/mxQueue.so 0775L
python-mx.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/BeeBase/mxBeeBase/testernesto.py
/usr/local/bin/python
python-mx.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/BeeBase/mxBeeBase/testernesto.py 0644L
/usr/local/bin/python
python-mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/TextTools/mxTextTools/mxTextTools.so
0775L
python-mx.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/Misc/Daemon.py 0644L /usr/bin/env
python-mx.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/Stack/stackbench.pyc
python-mx.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/Stack/stackbench.pyo
python-mx.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/DateTime/mxDateTime/test.pyc
python-mx.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/DateTime/mxDateTime/test.pyo
python-mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/UID/mxUID/mxUID.so 0775L
python-mx.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/Queue/queuebench.pyc
python-mx.x86_64: W: python-bytecode-without-source
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/Queue/queuebench.pyo
python-mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/URL/mxURL/mxURL.so 0775L
python-mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/BeeBase/mxBeeBase/mxBeeBase.so 0775L
python-mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/DateTime/mxDateTime/mxDateTime.so 0775L
python-mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/mx/Stack/mxStack/mxStack.so 0775L
[Bug 537687] Review Request: mediawiki-SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi - MediaWiki syntax highlighter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537687 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-07-29 21:42:49 --- Comment #5 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2011-07-29 21:42:49 EDT --- I would recommend somebody else attempt to submit this package as I have zero spare cycles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564518] Review Request: monodevelop-python - Python bindings for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564518 --- Comment #6 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2011-07-29 21:47:51 EDT --- What's the status on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670035] Tracker: mediawiki116 extensions for Fedora Infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670035 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-07-29 21:50:02 --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2011-07-29 21:50:02 EDT --- 1.16 has been on Fedora Infra for a while. Closing tracker ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 --- Comment #15 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2011-07-29 21:52:16 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 718798] Review Request: rpbar - A Ratpoison taskbar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718798 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-07-29 21:49:09 --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2011-07-29 21:49:09 EDT --- I no longer have an interest in maintaining this package. Someone may use this specfile as a starting point if they wish to package rpbar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 430603] Review Request: clex - A free file manager with a full-screen user interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430603 Nathan Owe ndowen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #27 from Nathan Owe ndowen...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 21:54:49 EDT --- I am unable to push changes to f15 and f14, says that I am denied and ACL page of the package says orphaned. So it seems I am the owner of the master but not f14 and f15. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530910] Review Request: hyena - Hyena is a library of GUI and non-GUI C# code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530910 --- Comment #9 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2011-07-29 21:55:31 EDT --- Sorry, I've totally dropped off the face of the planet for this bug. Claudio, do you wish to maintain this package? If so, and Ryan doesn't object, add FE-NEEDSPONSOR to the blocker list above since you need a sponsor for the packager group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710917] Review Request: vmpk - Virtual MIDI Piano Keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710917 --- Comment #6 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 22:00:54 EDT --- License specified to GPLv3+ and MIT and (LGPLv2 with exceptions or GPLv3) Spec URL: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/vmpk.spec SRPM URL: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/vmpk-0.4.0-3.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 430603] Review Request: clex - A free file manager with a full-screen user interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430603 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #28 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-07-29 22:21:31 EDT --- I unretired the f14 and f15 branches for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 430603] Review Request: clex - A free file manager with a full-screen user interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430603 --- Comment #29 from Nathan Owe ndowen...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 22:24:20 EDT --- Thank you :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725752] Review Request: gazebo - 3D multiple robot simulator with dynamics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725752 Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richmat...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com 2011-07-29 22:55:40 EDT --- I have a couple of comments for you. I'm not a sponsor, so I can't formally review this package, but I would like to help you along. 1) Gazebo bundles assimp, which is against the packaging guidelines at [1]. You'll have to remove assimp and use a system version, which is under review as bug 635511. 2) Fedora packages can't depend on packages from external sources. The ffmpeg-devel requirement cannot be satisfied by any Fedora packages. You'll have to build gazebo without ffmpeg support, somehow make ffmpeg a runtime requirement as opposed to a build time requirement, or submit gazebo to a third-party repository for consideration. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 725552] Review Request: python-confparser - A KISS parse to *nix config files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725552 Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-07-29 23:01:30 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||package-review@lists.fedora ||project.org Component|0x |Package Review AssignedTo|lemen...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||package-review@lists.fedora ||project.org Component|0x |Package Review AssignedTo|lemen...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #59 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-07-30 00:17:09 EDT --- What is being requested of the SCM admins here? Someone just set the fedora-cvs flag but I don't see any request to process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #59 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-07-30 00:17:09 EDT --- What is being requested of the SCM admins here? Someone just set the fedora-cvs flag but I don't see any request to process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
