[Bug 693200] Review Request: php-bartlett-PHP-Reflect - Adds the ability to reverse-engineer PHP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693200 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-30 01:08:19 EDT --- php-bartlett-PHP-Reflect-1.0.2-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-bartlett-PHP-Reflect-1.0.2-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737228] Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737228 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-30 00:05:56 EDT --- ghc-data-default-0.3.0-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-data-default-0.3.0-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737228] Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737228 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737228] Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737228 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-30 00:06:12 EDT --- ghc-data-default-0.3.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-data-default-0.3.0-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737228] Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737228 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-30 00:06:04 EDT --- ghc-data-default-0.3.0-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-data-default-0.3.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728826] Review Request: wadofstuff-django-serializers - Extended Django Serializer Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728826 --- Comment #8 from Yuguang Wang 2011-09-29 23:15:27 EDT --- Package updated: http://yuwang.fedorapeople.org/wadofstuff-django-serializers.spec http://yuwang.fedorapeople.org/wadofstuff-django-serializers-1.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm rpmlint wadofstuff-django-serializers-1.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728837] Review Request: python-xml2dict - Use attributes of dictionary to access xml elements.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728837 --- Comment #9 from Yuguang Wang 2011-09-29 23:10:25 EDT --- Source rpm updated: http://yuwang.fedorapeople.org/python-xml2dict.spec http://yuwang.fedorapeople.org/python-xml2dict-1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm I've renamed the package: http://xml2dict.googlecode.com/files/xml2dict-2008.6-tar.gz xml2dict-2008.6-tar.gz --> python-xml2dict-1.0.tar.gz Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739347] Review Request: haveged - A Linux entropy source using the HAVEGE algorithm. Feed entropy into random pool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739347 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-29 22:48:00 EDT --- haveged-1.2-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 718430] Review Request: unknown-horizons - a 2D RTS game written in python which uses the fife engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718430 Nelson Marques changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #12 from Nelson Marques 2011-09-29 22:24:45 EDT --- My apologies for the long reply. Regarding the fonts, those provided by upstream do have different version and in a 2 cases a different name, should I proceed with the linking ? Also when LinuxLibertine gets updated to 5, this will break and will require twiking again. I know upstream is preparing to improve the font engine, but it might not happen for a while. Right now, should I proceed with the font linking or can be slipped through until it gets fixed by upstream ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728823] Review Request: django-tinymce - TinyMCE form field editor for Django applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728823 --- Comment #7 from Yuguang Wang 2011-09-29 22:16:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Gotcha, thanks. srpm updated with spec file removed: http://yuwang.fedorapeople.org/django-tinymce.spec http://yuwang.fedorapeople.org/django-tinymce-1.5-1.fc13.src.rpm > You modified the tarball in the srpm, right? > You should just use the upstream source file without any modification. > The srpm already includes the spec file automatically there > is no need whatsoever to include it in the tarball. > Hope that makes it clearer. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739347] Review Request: haveged - A Linux entropy source using the HAVEGE algorithm. Feed entropy into random pool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739347 --- Comment #21 from Jiri Hladky 2011-09-29 20:26:07 EDT --- Hi Jussi, I have updated the package description. @GIT TEAM: thanks a lot! Jirka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739347] Review Request: haveged - A Linux entropy source using the HAVEGE algorithm. Feed entropy into random pool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739347 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739347] Review Request: haveged - A Linux entropy source using the HAVEGE algorithm. Feed entropy into random pool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739347 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-29 20:21:32 EDT --- haveged-1.2-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/haveged-1.2-3.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739347] Review Request: haveged - A Linux entropy source using the HAVEGE algorithm. Feed entropy into random pool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739347 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-29 20:23:42 EDT --- haveged-1.2-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/haveged-1.2-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 707002] Review Request: freemedforms - An open Electronic Medical Record Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707002 Michael Schwendt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mschwe...@gmail.com --- Comment #28 from Michael Schwendt 2011-09-29 19:47:03 EDT --- To the reviewer: please notice bug 742396 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652971] Review Request: code-editor - A text/code editor based on Qt Creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 --- Comment #34 from Michael Schwendt 2011-09-29 19:48:24 EDT --- > Do you suggest to modify to .spec file so that to avoid advertising > them as provided? For the versioned libraries that would be better. Not mandatory however with our current guidelines. Primarly I want you to be aware of this. Even if currently there are no other packages in the package collection, which share these library names, it is not nice to pollute the global namespace with versioned SONAME Provides. # repoquery --whatrequires libAggregation.so.1 freemedforms-devel-0:0.5.9-0.1.alpha1.fc16.i686 If we didn't had a base package dependency in the guidelines, this would break here already. [...] > Does it also mean that qt-creator and freemedforms should also be revised? freemedforms is mispackaged IMO: bug 742396 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739278] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen - Authentication plugin for HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739278 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-29 19:32:27 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen-0.04-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739278] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen - Authentication plugin for HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739278 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Aut ||hen-0.04-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-09-29 19:29:27 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739278] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen - Authentication plugin for HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739278 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Aut |perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Aut |hen-0.04-1.fc15 |hen-0.04-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739278] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen - Authentication plugin for HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739278 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-29 19:29:19 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen-0.04-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652971] Review Request: code-editor - A text/code editor based on Qt Creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 --- Comment #33 from Ilyes Gouta 2011-09-29 18:52:25 EDT --- Hi, Just to clarify a little bit more: Plugins/libraries providing the program's functionality: libBinEditor.so libCore.so libCppEditor.so libCppTools.so libFakeVim.so libFind.so libLocator.so libTextEditor.so Supporting libraries: libAggregation.so.1 libExtensionSystem.so.1 libLanguageUtils.so.1 libQtConcurrent.so.1 libUtils.so.1 libCPlusPlus.so.1 Both kind of libraries live in a private location (%_libdir/code-editor) and are internal and *exclusively* used by the program itself. No other program or library is meant to link against these. The build system (qmake based) indeed relies on RPATH to load these libraries at run-time: ilyes@whitebird ~/rpmbuild $ readelf -d /usr/bin/code-editor | grep RPATH 0x000f (RPATH) Library rpath: [$ORIGIN:$ORIGIN/..:$ORIGIN/../lib64/code-editor] Is this acceptable? Any suggestions? Thanks, -Ilyes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742389] New: Review Request: gtk-unico-engine - Unico Gtk+ theming engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gtk-unico-engine - Unico Gtk+ theming engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742389 Summary: Review Request: gtk-unico-engine - Unico Gtk+ theming engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/gtk-unico-engine/gtk-unico-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/gtk-unico-engine/gtk-unico-engine-1.0.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Unico is a Gtk+ engine that aims to be the more complete yet powerful theming engine for Gtk+ 3.0 and newer. It’s the first Gtk+ engine written with Gtk+ style context APIs in mind, using CSS as first class citizen. Notes: - build fine in mock - rpmlint: gtk-unico-engine.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) theming -> teeming, hemming, emitting gtk-unico-engine.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US theming -> teeming, hemming, emitting gtk-unico-engine.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) theming -> teeming, hemming, emitting gtk-unico-engine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US theming -> teeming, hemming, emitting 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742388] New: Review Request: polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742388 Summary: Review Request: polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loganje...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/polybori/polybori.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/polybori/polybori-0.8.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: PolyBoRi is a special purpose computer algebra system for computations in Boolean Rings. The core is a C++ library, which provides high-level data types for Boolean polynomials and related structures. As a unique approach, binary decision diagrams are used as internal storage type for polynomial structures. On top of this, we provide a Python interface for parsing of complex polynomial systems, as well as for sophisticated and extendable strategies for Gröbner base computation. This is a re-review for a name change. The original package name is python-polybori. The reason for the rename is that this package provides both C++ and python interfaces, and the new package structure enables consumers of the C++ interface to avoid pulling in python dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652971] Review Request: code-editor - A text/code editor based on Qt Creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 --- Comment #32 from Ilyes Gouta 2011-09-29 17:57:58 EDT --- Hi Michael, Yes, those are plug-ins loaded by the editor at run-time, where each one provide a bit of functionality so that the whole make up the entire program. This is Qt Creator's design. They're *private* to the program itself and shouldn't be loaded by any other party. Do you suggest to modify to .spec file so that to avoid advertising them as provided? > # repoquery --whatprovides libAggregation.so.1 > freemedforms-0:0.5.9-0.1.alpha1.fc16.i686 > qt-creator-0:2.3.0-0.0.beta.fc16.i686 Does it also mean that qt-creator and freemedforms should also be revised? Thanks, -Ilyes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652971] Review Request: code-editor - A text/code editor based on Qt Creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 --- Comment #31 from Michael Schwendt 2011-09-29 17:48:15 EDT --- $ rpm -qp --provides code-editor-2.3.0-9.fc16.i686.rpm|grep so libAggregation.so.1 libBinEditor.so libCPlusPlus.so.1 libCore.so libCppEditor.so libCppTools.so libExtensionSystem.so.1 libFakeVim.so libFind.so libLanguageUtils.so.1 libLocator.so libQtConcurrent.so.1 libTextEditor.so libUtils.so.1 The versioned ones in there are potentially dangerous as they bear a bigger risk of confusing depsolvers. These shared libs are stored in a private path in %_libdir/code-editor -- outside run-timer linker's search paths that is -- and hence the package should not "Provides" these library SONAMEs. # repoquery --whatprovides libAggregation.so.1 freemedforms-0:0.5.9-0.1.alpha1.fc16.i686 qt-creator-0:2.3.0-0.0.beta.fc16.i686 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652971] Review Request: code-editor - A text/code editor based on Qt Creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 --- Comment #30 from Rex Dieter 2011-09-29 17:44:39 EDT --- Correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652971] Review Request: code-editor - A text/code editor based on Qt Creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 --- Comment #29 from Ilyes Gouta 2011-09-29 17:37:10 EDT --- Hi, I imported code-editor into Fedora's SCM and successfully built it via fedpkg on Koji for f15, f16 and master branches. Following is the Koji's (simplified) log: Building code-editor-2.3.0-9.fc15 for f15-candidate Created task: 3389622 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3389622 3389622 build (f15-candidate, /code-editor:2a396b35baf31dc45c3dca35d72d636256a01508): open (ppc10.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3389622 build (f15-candidate, /code-editor:2a396b35baf31dc45c3dca35d72d636256a01508): open (ppc10.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 3389622 build (f15-candidate, /code-editor:2a396b35baf31dc45c3dca35d72d636256a01508) completed successfully Building code-editor-2.3.0-9.fc16 for f16-candidate Created task: 3389599 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3389599 3389599 build (f16-candidate, /code-editor:2a396b35baf31dc45c3dca35d72d636256a01508): open (ppc05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3389599 build (f16-candidate, /code-editor:2a396b35baf31dc45c3dca35d72d636256a01508): open (ppc05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 3389599 build (f16-candidate, /code-editor:2a396b35baf31dc45c3dca35d72d636256a01508) completed successfully Building code-editor-2.3.0-9.fc17 for dist-rawhide Created task: 3389554 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3389554 3389554 build (dist-rawhide, /code-editor:2a396b35baf31dc45c3dca35d72d636256a01508): free -> open (ppc05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3389554 build (dist-rawhide, /code-editor:2a396b35baf31dc45c3dca35d72d636256a01508): open (ppc05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 3389554 build (dist-rawhide, /code-editor:2a396b35baf31dc45c3dca35d72d636256a01508) completed successfully Next step would be pushing to Bodhi for testing, right? Thanks, :) -Ilyes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732552] Review Request: nodejs - Evented I/O for V8 JavaScript
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552 --- Comment #30 from Matěj Cepl 2011-09-29 16:42:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > Apologies, this patch was meant only to illustrate the issue, not propose a > solution. It looks like bug 741137 (which created the .o file rather than the > library) was closed as 'wontfix' so I'm not sure where this is all going now. If you create a patch for bug 741137, than I’ll make sure it will get applied and sent upstream. I think it was more desperation, that solution to that bug is not complete solution as well. I believe you are on the right track, and moreover I don't think randomly scattered .o files are a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652971] Review Request: code-editor - A text/code editor based on Qt Creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 --- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-29 15:59:35 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). f17==devel, should not be requested at present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652971] Review Request: code-editor - A text/code editor based on Qt Creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 --- Comment #28 from Ilyes Gouta 2011-09-29 16:11:44 EDT --- Hi Jon, Alright, thanks a lot! -Ilyes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652971] Review Request: code-editor - A text/code editor based on Qt Creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 Ilyes Gouta changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from Ilyes Gouta 2011-09-29 15:40:34 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: code-editor Short Description: A lightweight and cross-platform text and code editor based on Qt Creator Owners: ilyes Branches: f15 f16 f17 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652971] Review Request: code-editor - A text/code editor based on Qt Creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 --- Comment #25 from Ilyes Gouta 2011-09-29 15:39:36 EDT --- Thanks a lot Rex! I'll do my best contributing to Fedora! -Ilyes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732552] Review Request: nodejs - Evented I/O for V8 JavaScript
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552 --- Comment #29 from Eric Varsanyi 2011-09-29 15:22:24 EDT --- Apologies, this patch was meant only to illustrate the issue, not propose a solution. It looks like bug 741137 (which created the .o file rather than the library) was closed as 'wontfix' so I'm not sure where this is all going now. Putting the lib64 path in there directly is mostly definitely not The Right Thing, if it turns out 741137 is revived and the http parser lib stays a .o I will gladly figure out how to get the path via the correct variable in cmake and make a real patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732552] Review Request: nodejs - Evented I/O for V8 JavaScript
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552 --- Comment #28 from Matěj Cepl 2011-09-29 14:02:32 EDT --- Created attachment 525610 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=525610 reconstructed patch (In reply to comment #27) > The spec file in http-parser (from bug 741137) creates a .o file only rather > than a library. Below is a hack (to illustrate only) to the node js's cmake > input to link with this .o rather than the expected shared or static lib > (apologies for my lack of cmake foo): When applying the attached patch (please attach your patch, don't paste it, so as to avoid word-wrapping), I get this error: -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -rdynamic CPPFLAGS:-D__POSIX__=1 -DHAVE_FDATASYNC=1 -DPLATFORM="linux" -DX_STACKSIZE=65536 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DEV_MULTIPLICITY=1 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H=1 -DHAVE_OPENSSL=1 CMake Error: The following variables are used in this project, but they are set to NOTFOUND. Please set them or make sure they are set and tested correctly in the CMake files: HTTP_PARSER_OBJ linked by target "node" in directory /home/matej/build/BUILD/node-v0.4.11 Also, hardcoded /usr/lib64 is probably not The Right Thing™ to do, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740283] Review Request: ghc-attoparsec-enumerator - Haskell attoparsec to enumerator library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740283 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-29 13:12:32 EDT --- ghc-attoparsec-enumerator-0.2.0.4-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742309] New: Review Request: drupal6-imce_wysiwyg - Allows to use IMCE module with Wysiwyg module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-imce_wysiwyg - Allows to use IMCE module with Wysiwyg module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742309 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-imce_wysiwyg - Allows to use IMCE module with Wysiwyg module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-imce_wysiwyg.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-imce_wysiwyg-1.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Allows to use IMCE module with Wysiwyg module. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal6-imce_wysiwyg.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-imce_wysiwyg-1.1-1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal6-imce_wysiwyg-1.1-1.fc15.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388694 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3388694 build (dist-f15, drupal6-imce_wysiwyg-1.1-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc08.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388695 buildArch (drupal6-imce_wysiwyg-1.1-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-07.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388695 buildArch (drupal6-imce_wysiwyg-1.1-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-07.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3388694 build (dist-f15, drupal6-imce_wysiwyg-1.1-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc08.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3388694 build (dist-f15, drupal6-imce_wysiwyg-1.1-1.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742305] New: Review Request: drupal6-google_analytics - Adds the Google Analytics web statistics tracking system to your website
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-google_analytics - Adds the Google Analytics web statistics tracking system to your website https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742305 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-google_analytics - Adds the Google Analytics web statistics tracking system to your website Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-google_analytics.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-google_analytics-3.3-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Adds the Google Analytics web statistics tracking system to your website. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal6-google_analytics.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-google_analytics-3.3-1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal6-google_analytics-3.3-1.fc15.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388674 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3388674 build (dist-f15, drupal6-google_analytics-3.3-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388675 buildArch (drupal6-google_analytics-3.3-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free 3388675 buildArch (drupal6-google_analytics-3.3-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (x86-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388675 buildArch (drupal6-google_analytics-3.3-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3388674 build (dist-f15, drupal6-google_analytics-3.3-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3388674 build (dist-f15, drupal6-google_analytics-3.3-1.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742300] New: Review Request: drupal6-forum_access - This module allows you to set forums private
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-forum_access - This module allows you to set forums private https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742300 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-forum_access - This module allows you to set forums private Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-forum_access.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-forum_access-1.5-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module changes your forum administration page to allow you to set forums private. You can control what user roles can view, edit, delete, and post to each forum. You can also give each forum a list of users who have administrative access on that forum (AKA moderators) rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal6-forum_access.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-forum_access-1.5-1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal6-forum_access-1.5-1.fc15.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388656 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3388656 build (dist-f15, drupal6-forum_access-1.5-1.fc15.src.rpm): free 3388656 build (dist-f15, drupal6-forum_access-1.5-1.fc15.src.rpm): free -> open (ppc06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388657 buildArch (drupal6-forum_access-1.5-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free 3388657 buildArch (drupal6-forum_access-1.5-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (x86-17.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388657 buildArch (drupal6-forum_access-1.5-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-17.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3388656 build (dist-f15, drupal6-forum_access-1.5-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3388656 build (dist-f15, drupal6-forum_access-1.5-1.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742296] New: Review Request: drupal6-imce - IMCE is an image/file uploader and browser that supports personal directories and quota
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-imce - IMCE is an image/file uploader and browser that supports personal directories and quota https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742296 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-imce - IMCE is an image/file uploader and browser that supports personal directories and quota Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-imce.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-imce-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: IMCE is an image/file uploader and browser that supports personal directories and quota. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal6-imce.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-imce-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal6-imce-2.2-1.fc15.noarch.rpm drupal6-imce.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) uploader -> uploaded, up loader, up-loader drupal6-imce.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US uploader -> uploaded, up loader, up-loader drupal6-imce.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) uploader -> uploaded, up loader, up-loader drupal6-imce.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US uploader -> uploaded, up loader, up-loader 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388609 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3388609 build (dist-f15, drupal6-imce-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm): free 3388609 build (dist-f15, drupal6-imce-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm): free -> open (x86-16.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388612 buildArch (drupal6-imce-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free 3388612 buildArch (drupal6-imce-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (x86-14.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388612 buildArch (drupal6-imce-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-14.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3388609 build (dist-f15, drupal6-imce-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (x86-16.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3388609 build (dist-f15, drupal6-imce-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742221] Review Request: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts - Shorthand for common Moose attribute options
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742221 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-29 11:51:40 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742289] New: Review Request: drupal6-filefield_sources - The FileField module lets you upload files from your computer through a CCK field
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-filefield_sources - The FileField module lets you upload files from your computer through a CCK field https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742289 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-filefield_sources - The FileField module lets you upload files from your computer through a CCK field Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-filefield_sources.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-filefield_sources-1.4-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: FileField Sources is an extension to the FileField module. The FileField module lets you upload files from your computer through a CCK field. The FileField Sources module expands on this ability by allowing you to select new or existing files through additional means rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal6-filefield_sources.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-filefield_sources-1.4-1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal6-filefield_sources-1.4-1.fc15.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388595 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3388595 build (dist-f15, drupal6-filefield_sources-1.4-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (x86-12.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388597 buildArch (drupal6-filefield_sources-1.4-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-12.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388597 buildArch (drupal6-filefield_sources-1.4-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-12.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3388595 build (dist-f15, drupal6-filefield_sources-1.4-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (x86-12.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3388595 build (dist-f15, drupal6-filefield_sources-1.4-1.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742283] New: Review Request: drupal6-faq - FAQ module allows users, with appropriate permissions, to create question and answer pairs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-faq - FAQ module allows users, with appropriate permissions, to create question and answer pairs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742283 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-faq - FAQ module allows users, with appropriate permissions, to create question and answer pairs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-faq.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-faq-1.12-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: The Frequently Asked Questions (faq) module allows users, with appropriate permissions, to create question and answer pairs which they want displayed on the 'faq' page. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal6-faq.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-faq-1.12-1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal6-faq-1.12-1.fc15.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388548 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3388548 build (dist-f15, drupal6-faq-1.12-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (x86-18.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388549 buildArch (drupal6-faq-1.12-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free 3388549 buildArch (drupal6-faq-1.12-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (x86-18.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388549 buildArch (drupal6-faq-1.12-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-18.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3388548 build (dist-f15, drupal6-faq-1.12-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (x86-18.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3388548 build (dist-f15, drupal6-faq-1.12-1.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742272] New: Review Request: drupal6-dul - This module disables the language selector in the user profile form for all the users but the first user
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-dul - This module disables the language selector in the user profile form for all the users but the first user https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742272 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-dul - This module disables the language selector in the user profile form for all the users but the first user Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-dul.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-dul-1.6-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module disables the language selector in the user profile form for all the users but the first user. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal6-dul.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-dul-1.6-1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal6-dul-1.6-1.fc15.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388480 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3388480 build (dist-f15, drupal6-dul-1.6-1.fc15.src.rpm): free 3388480 build (dist-f15, drupal6-dul-1.6-1.fc15.src.rpm): free -> open (x86-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388481 buildArch (drupal6-dul-1.6-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-14.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388481 buildArch (drupal6-dul-1.6-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-14.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3388480 build (dist-f15, drupal6-dul-1.6-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (x86-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3388480 build (dist-f15, drupal6-dul-1.6-1.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742266] New: Review Request: drupal6-boost - Boost provides static page caching
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-boost - Boost provides static page caching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742266 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-boost - Boost provides static page caching Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-boost.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-boost-1.18-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Boost provides static page caching for Drupal enabling a very significant performance and scalability boost for sites that receive mostly anonymous traffic rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal6-boost.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-boost-1.18-1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal6-boost-1.18-1.fc15.noarch.rpm drupal6-boost.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalability -> implacability, sociability, capability drupal6-boost.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalability -> implacability, sociability, capability 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388392 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3388392 build (dist-f15, drupal6-boost-1.18-1.fc15.src.rpm): free 3388392 build (dist-f15, drupal6-boost-1.18-1.fc15.src.rpm): free -> open (ppc08.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388393 buildArch (drupal6-boost-1.18-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-03.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388393 buildArch (drupal6-boost-1.18-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-03.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3388392 build (dist-f15, drupal6-boost-1.18-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc08.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3388392 build (dist-f15, drupal6-boost-1.18-1.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945 Mo Morsi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Mo Morsi 2011-09-29 10:31:02 EDT --- Overall looks good, koji build is green http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388155 A few nits * BuildRoot is no longer needed and should be removed * same w/ the rm buildroot in the install and clean sections * Do we still need the exceptions for the older non-supported Fedora versions? I see these in the python guidelienss though so if they are required you can just ignore this note * is python-devel required as a build time dependency (again see this in the python guideliness, but this is my first python package review so I could be mistaken) >From what I can tell, everything else looks good, so APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742261] New: Review Request: drupal6-block_class - Block Class add classes to any block
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-block_class - Block Class add classes to any block https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742261 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-block_class - Block Class add classes to any block Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-block_class.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-block_class-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Block Class allows users to add classes to any block through the block's configuration interface. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal6-block_class.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-block_class-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal6-block_class-1.3-1.fc15.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388375 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3388375 build (dist-f15, drupal6-block_class-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm): free 3388375 build (dist-f15, drupal6-block_class-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm): free -> open (x86-06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388376 buildArch (drupal6-block_class-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free 3388376 buildArch (drupal6-block_class-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (x86-06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388376 buildArch (drupal6-block_class-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3388375 build (dist-f15, drupal6-block_class-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (x86-06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3388375 build (dist-f15, drupal6-block_class-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945 Mo Morsi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mmo...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mo Morsi 2011-09-29 10:26:26 EDT --- Taking this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742256] New: Review Request: drupal6-better_formats - Better formats is a module to add more flexibility to Drupal's core input format system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-better_formats - Better formats is a module to add more flexibility to Drupal's core input format system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742256 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-better_formats - Better formats is a module to add more flexibility to Drupal's core input format system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-better_formats.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-better_formats-1.2-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Better formats is a module to add more flexibility to Drupal's core input format system. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal6-better_formats.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-better_formats-1.2-1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal6-better_formats-1.2-1.fc15.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388344 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3388344 build (dist-f15, drupal6-better_formats-1.2-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc09.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388345 buildArch (drupal6-better_formats-1.2-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free 3388345 buildArch (drupal6-better_formats-1.2-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (x86-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388345 buildArch (drupal6-better_formats-1.2-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3388344 build (dist-f15, drupal6-better_formats-1.2-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc09.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3388344 build (dist-f15, drupal6-better_formats-1.2-1.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742221] Review Request: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts - Shorthand for common Moose attribute options
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742221 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar 2011-09-29 10:13:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Inform upstream about the incorrect FSF address. Done (https://github.com/RsrchBoy/moosex-attributeshortcuts/issues/3). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742221] Review Request: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts - Shorthand for common Moose attribute options
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742221 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar 2011-09-29 10:11:53 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts Short Description: Shorthand for common Moose attribute options Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742221] Review Request: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts - Shorthand for common Moose attribute options
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742221 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742253] New: Review Request: drupal6-autocomplete_widgets - This module adds 3 autocomplete widgets for CCK fields of type Text and Number
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-autocomplete_widgets - This module adds 3 autocomplete widgets for CCK fields of type Text and Number https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742253 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-autocomplete_widgets - This module adds 3 autocomplete widgets for CCK fields of type Text and Number Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-autocomplete_widgets.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-autocomplete_widgets-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module adds 3 autocomplete widgets for CCK fields of type Text and Number. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal6-autocomplete_widgets.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-autocomplete_widgets-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal6-autocomplete_widgets-1.3-1.fc15.noarch.rpm drupal6-autocomplete_widgets.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) autocomplete -> auto complete, auto-complete, complete drupal6-autocomplete_widgets.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autocomplete -> auto complete, auto-complete, complete drupal6-autocomplete_widgets.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) autocomplete -> auto complete, auto-complete, complete drupal6-autocomplete_widgets.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autocomplete -> auto complete, auto-complete, complete 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388321 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3388321 build (dist-f15, drupal6-autocomplete_widgets-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc07.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388322 buildArch (drupal6-autocomplete_widgets-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free 3388322 buildArch (drupal6-autocomplete_widgets-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388322 buildArch (drupal6-autocomplete_widgets-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3388321 build (dist-f15, drupal6-autocomplete_widgets-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc07.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3388321 build (dist-f15, drupal6-autocomplete_widgets-1.3-1.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742221] Review Request: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts - Shorthand for common Moose attribute options
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742221
Petr Sabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Petr Sabata 2011-09-29 10:00:39 EDT ---
Package: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts
Version: 0.005
Release: 1.fc17
Sources: MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.005.tar.gz
Patches:
--
Package successfully built in koji, dist-rawhide.
MUST items:
[ OK ] Package does NOT include pre-built binaries or libraries
[ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American english
[ OK ] Package successfully builds on at least one supported primary
architecture
[ -- ] All ExcludeArch tags valid, referencing proper bug reports
[ OK ] Package obeys FHS (with _libexecdir and /srv exceptions)
[ NOTE ] No errors reported by rpmlint
[ OK ] Changelog present and properly formatted
[ OK ] Package does NOT include Packager, Vendor, Copyright or PreReq tags
[ OK ] Source tags are working URLs and sources match upstream or justified
otherwise
[ OK ] Requires correct or justified otherwise
[ OK ] BuildRequires correct or justified otherwise
[ OK ] All file names are in proper UTF-8 encoding
[ OK ] All plain text failes are in proper UTF-8 encoding
[ -- ] Large documentation files are located in doc subpackage
[ OK ] All documentation prefixed with %doc
[ OK ] Documentation is NOT executable
[ OK ] No files in %doc are needed at run-time
[ -- ] Compiler flags honor Fedora defaults or are justified
[ -- ] Package uses hardened build (-fPIC, -fPIE) if appropriate
[ -- ] Package generates useful debuginfo packages
[ -- ] Header files are placed in devel subpackage
[ -- ] Unversioned shared libraries are placed in devel subpackage
[ -- ] Pkgconfig files are placed in devel subpackage
[ -- ] Full-versioned Requires of the base package in subpackages
[ -- ] Package calls ldconfig in post and postun sections for all
subpackages, if applicable
[ -- ] Static libraries are provided by static subpackage
[ OK ] Package contains no static executables unless approved by FESCo
[ OK ] Package does NOT bundle any system libraries
[ -- ] RPath not used for anything besides internal libraries
[ -- ] All config files are marked noreplace or justified otherwise
[ OK ] No config files are located under /usr
[ -- ] Package contains working systemd unit files and requires systemd-units
[ -- ] All systemd unit files are named according to the Guidelines
[ -- ] Package contains a SystemV-compatible initscript only as an optional
addition to systemd unit files
[ -- ] If package contains an initscript, it's placed in sysvinit subpackage
[ -- ] A GUI application installs a proper desktop file
[ -- ] All desktop files are installed by desktop-file-install or justified
otherwise
[ OK ] Package consistently uses macros
[ -- ] makeinstall macro is used only if make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
does NOT work
[ -- ] Macros in Summary and description are expandable at build-time
[ -- ] globals used in place of defines
[ -- ] Locales handled correctly -- package requires gettext and uses
find_lang, if applicable
[ -- ] Scriptlets are sane
[ OK ] Package is not relocatable unless justified
[ OK ] Package contains only acceptable code or content
[ OK ] Package owns all the files and directories it creates, installs and/or
uses unless those are already owned by another package
[ OK ] files sections do NOT contain duplicate files except for licenses
[ OK ] Package does NOT cause any conflicts
[ OK ] Package does NOT contain kernel modules
[ OK ] Package does NOT bundle fonts or other general purpose data
[ OK ] Final Requires and Provides are sane
SHOULD items:
[ OK ] The Summary does NOT end with a period
[ OK ] Package does NOT include BuildRoot tag, clean section or buildroot
removal in install section
[ OK ] Package should preserve files timestamps
[ OK ] Package does NOT explicitly BuildRequire bash, bzip2, coreutils, cpio,
diffutils, fedora-release, findutils, gawk, gcc, gcc-c++, grep, gzip, info,
make, patch, redhat-rpm-config, rpm-build, sed, shadow-utils, tar, unzip,
util-linux-ng, which or xz
[ OK ] Description does NOT consist of lines longer than 80 characters
[ OK ] Package uses parallel make
[ -- ] In case of a web application, package installs date into /usr/share
instead of /var/www
[ -- ] All patches have a comment or an upstream bug link
[ -- ] Package installs manpages for all executables
[ OK ] Package contains check section and all tests pass
[ ?? ] Package works as expected
NOTES:
--
Inform upstream about the incorrect FSF address.
Approving.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
[Bug 742247] New: Review Request: drupal6-author_pane - Author Pane is a block of information about a given user
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-author_pane - Author Pane is a block of information about a given user https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742247 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-author_pane - Author Pane is a block of information about a given user Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-author_pane.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-author_pane-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Author Pane is a block of information about a given user, like those typically found on a forum post, but can be used in other places as well. >From core, it collects the user picture, name, join date, online status, contact link, and profile information. In addition, any module or theme can feed it more information via the preprocess system. All of this information is then gathered and displayed using a template file. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal6-author_pane.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-author_pane-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal6-author_pane-2.2-1.fc15.noarch.rpm drupal6-author_pane.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US preprocess -> reprocess, p reprocess, processors drupal6-author_pane.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US preprocess -> reprocess, p reprocess, processors 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388287 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3388287 build (dist-f15, drupal6-author_pane-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm): free 3388287 build (dist-f15, drupal6-author_pane-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm): free -> open (ppc09.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388288 buildArch (drupal6-author_pane-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-09.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388288 buildArch (drupal6-author_pane-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-09.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3388287 build (dist-f15, drupal6-author_pane-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc09.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3388287 build (dist-f15, drupal6-author_pane-2.2-1.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742238] New: Review Request: drupal6-advanced_forum - Advanced Forum builds on and enhances Drupal's core forum module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-advanced_forum - Advanced Forum builds on and enhances Drupal's core forum module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742238 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-advanced_forum - Advanced Forum builds on and enhances Drupal's core forum module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-advanced_forum.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-advanced_forum-2.0-0.1.alpha4.fc15.src.rpm Description: Advanced Forum builds on and enhances Drupal's core forum module. When used in combination with other Drupal contributed modules, many of which are automatically used by Advanced Forum, you can achieve much of what stand alone software provides. Because it uses the core forum module, it uses the node and comment system built into Drupal and is completely integrated, not a bridge. While it doesn't have all of the features of stand alone forum applications, being completely integrated into your site provides advantages that they don't. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal6-advanced_forum.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-advanced_forum-2.0-0.1.alpha4.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal6-advanced_forum-2.0-0.1.alpha4.fc15.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388258 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3388258 build (dist-f15, drupal6-advanced_forum-2.0-0.1.alpha4.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc08.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388259 buildArch (drupal6-advanced_forum-2.0-0.1.alpha4.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free 3388259 buildArch (drupal6-advanced_forum-2.0-0.1.alpha4.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (x86-16.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388259 buildArch (drupal6-advanced_forum-2.0-0.1.alpha4.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-16.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3388258 build (dist-f15, drupal6-advanced_forum-2.0-0.1.alpha4.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc08.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3388258 build (dist-f15, drupal6-advanced_forum-2.0-0.1.alpha4.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742231] New: Review Request: drupal6-acl - API for other modules to create lists of users and give them access to nodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal6-acl - API for other modules to create lists of users and give them access to nodes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742231 Summary: Review Request: drupal6-acl - API for other modules to create lists of users and give them access to nodes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-acl.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal6-acl-1.4-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: The ACL module, short for Access Control Lists, is an API for other modules to create lists of users and give them access to nodes. It has no UI of its own and will not do anything by itself; install this module only if some other module tells you to. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal6-acl.spec ../SRPMS/drupal6-acl-1.4-1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal6-acl-1.4-1.fc15.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388229 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3388229 build (dist-f15, drupal6-acl-1.4-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc07.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388231 buildArch (drupal6-acl-1.4-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-10.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3388231 buildArch (drupal6-acl-1.4-1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-10.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3388229 build (dist-f15, drupal6-acl-1.4-1.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc07.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3388229 build (dist-f15, drupal6-acl-1.4-1.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728208] Review Request: jboss-threads - JBoss Threads
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728208 Tomas Radej changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||tra...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tra...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Tomas Radej 2011-09-29 09:12:43 EDT --- Taking this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 727323] Review Request: vios-proxy - Network proxy between a QEMU host and QEMU guests using virtioserial channels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727323 Nuno Santos changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-09-29 09:10:09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742221] Review Request: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts - Shorthand for common Moose attribute options
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742221 Petr Sabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728171] Review Request: jboss-logging-tools - JBoss Logging I18n Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728171
--- Comment #2 from Tomas Radej 2011-09-29 08:39:46 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output: jboss-logging-tools.noarch: W: no-documentation
jboss-logging-tools.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
jboss-logging-tools-1.0.0.Beta7.tar.xz
jboss-logging-tools-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Javadocs
-> Java docs, Java-docs, Avocados
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: LGPLv2+
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for
the
package is included in %doc.
[-] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[!] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks) <<
The folder copied is apidocs, should be apidocs/*
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses "-Dmaven.test.skip=true" explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap "-Dmaven.local.depmap.file=*" explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged. << Beta 8 is available, but I suppose it's
not a blocker
*** ISSUES ***
- Copied folder in javadoc is apidocs, should be apidocs/*
*** NOTES ***
- Version Beta 8 is available
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742221] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts - Shorthand for common Moose attribute options
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts - Shorthand for common Moose attribute options https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742221 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts - Shorthand for common Moose attribute options Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.005-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Ever find yourself repeatedly specifying writers and builders, because there's no good shortcut to specify them? Sometimes you want an attribute to have a read-only public interface, but a private writer. And wouldn't it be easier to just say "builder => 1" and have the attribute construct the canonical "_build_$name" builder name for you? This package causes an attribute trait to be applied to all attributes defined to the using class. This trait extends the attribute option processing to handle the above variations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742221] Review Request: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts - Shorthand for common Moose attribute options
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742221 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||742188 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737228] Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737228 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2011-09-29 08:11:54 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737228] Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737228 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737228] Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737228 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|Ready | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 731972] Review Request: cab - Haskell Cabal package maintenance program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731972 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2011-09-29 06:56:05 EDT --- Built for rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388004 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742189] New: Review Request: rubygem-webmock - Library for stubbing HTTP requests in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-webmock - Library for stubbing HTTP requests in Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742189 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-webmock - Library for stubbing HTTP requests in Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmo...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/rpms/rubygem-webmock.spec SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/rpms/rubygem-webmock-1.7.6-1.fc15.src.rpm Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388044 Description: WebMock allows stubbing HTTP requests and setting expectations on HTTP requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738034] Review Request: woodstox-core-asl - High-performance XML processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738034 --- Comment #4 from Jaromír Cápík 2011-09-29 06:17:35 EDT --- Unfortunately intentions of upstream are to have two separate JAR packages with separate licensing ... http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/woodstox/woodstox-core-lgpl/4.1.2/woodstox-core-lgpl-4.1.2.pom http://repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/woodstox/woodstox-core-asl/4.1.2/woodstox-core-asl-4.1.2.pom Let me check that with fedora-legal if it's possible to create just one package supplying both poms and artifacts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728171] Review Request: jboss-logging-tools - JBoss Logging I18n Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728171 Tomas Radej changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||tra...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tra...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Tomas Radej 2011-09-29 06:11:19 EDT --- Taking this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742166] New: Review Request: wmctrl - X Window Manager command-line tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wmctrl - X Window Manager command-line tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742166 Summary: Review Request: wmctrl - X Window Manager command-line tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/wmctrl/wmctrl.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/wmctrl/wmctrl-1.07-8.fc16.src.rpm Description: http://tomas.styblo.name/wmctrl This is a 'classical' X windows winmgr tool that was orphaned before F15 that I would like to revive since it is unique and rather useful. Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3387957 (AFAICT perl is broken right now in rawhide so I built for f16 instead.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728823] Review Request: django-tinymce - TinyMCE form field editor for Django applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728823 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2011-09-29 05:40:11 EDT --- You modified the tarball in the srpm, right? You should just use the upstream source file without any modification. The srpm already includes the spec file automatically there is no need whatsoever to include it in the tarball. Hope that makes it clearer. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740283] Review Request: ghc-attoparsec-enumerator - Haskell attoparsec to enumerator library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740283 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-29 05:35:10 EDT --- ghc-attoparsec-enumerator-0.2.0.4-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-attoparsec-enumerator-0.2.0.4-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740283] Review Request: ghc-attoparsec-enumerator - Haskell attoparsec to enumerator library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740283 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-29 05:35:20 EDT --- ghc-attoparsec-enumerator-0.2.0.4-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-attoparsec-enumerator-0.2.0.4-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740283] Review Request: ghc-attoparsec-enumerator - Haskell attoparsec to enumerator library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740283 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-09-29 05:35:00 EDT --- ghc-attoparsec-enumerator-0.2.0.4-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-attoparsec-enumerator-0.2.0.4-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740283] Review Request: ghc-attoparsec-enumerator - Haskell attoparsec to enumerator library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740283 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728823] Review Request: django-tinymce - TinyMCE form field editor for Django applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728823 --- Comment #5 from Yuguang Wang 2011-09-29 03:34:12 EDT --- hi Jens, What do you mean by 'There is no need to re-roll the upstream tarball'? Shouldn't I provide the src.rpm? Did I miss anything? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608574] Review Request: tinymce - Web based Javascript HTML WYSIWYG editor control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608574 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728823] Review Request: django-tinymce - TinyMCE form field editor for Django applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728823 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2011-09-29 03:14:08 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728826] Review Request: wadofstuff-django-serializers - Extended Django Serializer Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728826 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2011-09-29 03:13:43 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728837] Review Request: python-xml2dict - Use attributes of dictionary to access xml elements.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728837 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2011-09-29 03:13:19 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
