[Bug 738162] Review request: rubygem-oauth-active-resource - An OAuth enabled ActiveResource wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738162 --- Comment #2 from Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2011-10-14 02:02:44 EDT --- Fixed few minorities (see changelog). SPEC: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/oauth-active-resource/rubygem-oauth-active-resource.spec SRPM: bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/oauth-active-resource/rubygem-oauth-active-resource-0.4.7-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745383] Review request: rubygem-shindo - Simple depth first Ruby testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745383 Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-10-14 02:04:47 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737550] Review Request: rubygem-mg - Minimal gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737550 Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bkab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2011-10-14 03:55:29 EDT --- I'm taking this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737550] Review Request: rubygem-mg - Minimal gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737550 Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737550] Review Request: rubygem-mg - Minimal gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737550
--- Comment #2 from Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2011-10-14 04:07:32
EDT ---
- Remove unused definitions (ruby_sitelib, ruby_sitearch)
- You don't need to specify the BuildRoot, see [1]
- Be a little more verbose in the description section (you can for example add
the line from README.mkd - Minimalist way to build and publish gems using
Rake. Also build tarballs.).
- Consider introducing doc subpackage and moving %doc
%{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version} into it.
- Next time, consider using gem2rpm, it saves a lot of work when packaging
rubygems.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720356] Review Request: rubygem-rack-ssl - Force SSL/TLS in your app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720356 Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||bkab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bkab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2011-10-14 04:24:06 EDT --- I'm taking this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720356] Review Request: rubygem-rack-ssl - Force SSL/TLS in your app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720356
Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2011-10-14 04:35:18
EDT ---
- License should be MIT, I don't see any references to GPLv2+ or Ruby in any of
the included files.
- Maybe you could alter the way you run tests by moving the
-I%{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/lib parameter to RUBYOPT. I think that once you use
RUBYOPT, you should place everything in it not to make mess of things.
So after you correct the License tag, this package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670209] Review Request: rubygem-rsolr - A Ruby client for Apache Solr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670209 Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||bkab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bkab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2011-10-14 04:52:02 EDT --- I'm taking this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670209] Review Request: rubygem-rsolr - A Ruby client for Apache Solr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670209 Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2011-10-14 05:00:44 EDT --- - The tests are compatible with RSpec 2, so I would recommend changing BR: rubygem(rspec) to rubygem(rspec-core). - Consider moving README.rdoc to doc subpackage. - The %defattr(-, root, root, -) lines can be omitted according to [1] So after you repair these few details, this package is APPROVED. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742759] Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - Perl interface to the GNU Aspell library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742759 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED Flag||needinfo?(tcallawa@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #9 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-10-14 05:36:13 EDT --- I'm sorry, but this package was orphaned for a reason. Major applications are now using hunspell instead of aspell (feature from F-9). All packages dependent on perl-Text-Aspell should be fixed to do not use it. You might didn't notice message on fedora-devel: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-April/150919.html And last git commit in old repo says: Retired in favor of perl-Text-Hunspell. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742759] Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - Perl interface to the GNU Aspell library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742759 --- Comment #10 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2011-10-14 06:11:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) All packages dependent on perl-Text-Aspell should be fixed to do not use it. I understood from the feature that applications would use hunspell but not that all other dictionaries would be removed from the distribution. Is this going to happen with OpenSSL once the Crypto Consolidation feature lands ? You might didn't notice message on fedora-devel: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-April/150919.html I can't speak for Tom but I missed this. I was convinced that perl-Text-Aspell had been orphaned with devel or perl-devel being warned. And last git commit in old repo says: Retired in favor of perl-Text-Hunspell. This is extremely bad form. We've had broken deps in the distribution since April because this package was retired prematurely. acheck should have first built without it as a dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745993] Review Request: rubygem-useragent - HTTP User Agent parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745993 Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||bkab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bkab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2011-10-14 06:22:52 EDT --- I'm taking this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745993] Review Request: rubygem-useragent - HTTP User Agent parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745993 --- Comment #2 from Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2011-10-14 06:36:01 EDT --- - You should run tests/specs it upstream has them. Download them from upstream (https://github.com/josh/useragent), make another source of them and use them. You can look at [1] for an example of how this can be done. - It is not necessary to include license both in the main package and in the doc subpackage, since the doc subpackage Requires the main one (and thus can only be present if the main one is). I would recommend leaving the LICENSE file just in the main package. [1] http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/bson_ext/rubygem-bson_ext.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683790] Review Request: rubygem-hoe-yard - A Hoe plug-in for generating YARD documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683790 Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||bkab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bkab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2011-10-14 07:37:13 EDT --- I'm taking this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746215] New: Review Request: perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth - RT Authentication using External Sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth - RT Authentication using External Sources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746215 Summary: Review Request: perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth - RT Authentication using External Sources Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: m...@v3.sk QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth.spec SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth-0.09-2.fc14.src.rpm Description: A complete package for adding external authentication mechanisms to RT. It currently supports LDAP via Net::LDAP and External Database authentication for any database with an installed DBI driver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 683790] Review Request: rubygem-hoe-yard - A Hoe plug-in for generating YARD documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683790
--- Comment #3 from Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2011-10-14 07:51:23
EDT ---
- License is MIT.
- The defined %ruby_sitelib macro is never used, so please remove it.
- You should use %global instead of %define, according to [1].
- You don't need to specify BuildRoot tag, see [2]
- Could you explain the Requires: rubygem(rubyforge) and Requires:
rubygem(gemcutter)? I don't see why the library wouldn't work without them.
- Simlarly, can you explain the BuildRequires: rubygem(yard)? I don't see what
you need yard for during the build.
- You don't need to use the %defattr(-, root, root, -) line, see [3]
- Consider moving documentation into a subpackage (except of README.rdoc, which
contains licensing info and therefore should be left in the main package).
- rpmbuild complains about History.rdoc and Manifest.txt listed twice. To solve
it:
** the package shouldn't own the whole %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/
directory (BTW you can use %{geminstdir} instead of it), but should rather own
%dir %{geminstdir}
** when you do that, you will need to add every subdirectory and file in
%{geminstdir} to %files, but you will be able to avoid the complaints about
files listed twice
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746215] Review Request: perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth - RT Authentication using External Sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746215 --- Comment #1 from Michal Ingeli m...@v3.sk 2011-10-14 08:02:40 EDT --- - builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3430712 - rpmlint silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744224] Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-Base - Base class SAX Drivers and Filters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744224 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-10-14 08:06:27 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711893] Review Request: rubygem-dnsruby - Ruby DNS(SEC) implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711893 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-14 08:12:23 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742559] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-REPL - Read-eval-print-loop for debugging your Catalyst application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742559 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-14 08:18:19 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 741142] znc-infobot PackageReview - Infobot plugin for ZNC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741142 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-14 08:14:41 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Nick, please take ownership of review BZs. Keiran, please leave InitialCC blank if nothing is needed. Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737550] Review Request: rubygem-mg - Minimal gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737550
--- Comment #3 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com 2011-10-14 08:30:10
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
- Remove unused definitions (ruby_sitelib, ruby_sitearch)
Done.
- You don't need to specify the BuildRoot, see [1]
Done.
- Be a little more verbose in the description section (you can for example add
the line from README.mkd - Minimalist way to build and publish gems using
Rake. Also build tarballs.).
Done
- Consider introducing doc subpackage and moving %doc
%{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version} into it.
Thanks for the suggestion. I've put that separation back into the spec.
- Next time, consider using gem2rpm, it saves a lot of work when packaging
rubygems.
This spec file -was- generated with gem2rpm.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
Here are the updated files:
SPEC: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-mg.spec
SRPM: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-mg-0.0.8-1.fc15.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740814] Review Request: Jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740814 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Group|support | CC Accessible|1 |0 CC||akurt...@redhat.com Reporter|1 |0 Accessible|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740814] Review Request: Jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740814 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-14 09:46:23 EDT --- Subject is Jena, SCM request is jena, please make them match so I know which you want. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740814] Review Request: jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740814 --- Comment #7 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com 2011-10-14 10:01:23 EDT --- It's jena. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740814] Review Request: jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740814 Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: Jena - Java |Review Request: jena - Java |framework for building |framework for building |Semantic Web Applications |Semantic Web Applications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745993] Review Request: rubygem-useragent - HTTP User Agent parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745993 James Laska jla...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||743402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746079] Review Request: rubygem-grit library for extracting info from a git repository in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746079 James Laska jla...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||743402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746031] Review Request: rubygem-aeolus-cli - Command-line interface for working with the Aeolus cloud suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746031 James Laska jla...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||743402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740814] Review Request: jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740814 Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745160] Review Request: apper - KDE interface for PackageKit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745160 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||apper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745160] Review Request: apper - KDE interface for PackageKit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745160 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-10-14 11:50:59 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3431324 rpmlint *.rpm apper.src:24: W: unversioned-explicit-provides PackageKit-session-service 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740814] Review Request: jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740814 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-14 12:10:36 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701801] Review Request: ast - A Library for Handling World Coordinate Systems in Astronomy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701801 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-10-14 14:04:34 EDT --- * Fri Oct 14 2011 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 5.7.2-1 - Update to 5.7-2 - Truncate description - Move documentation to subpackage I'm not sure how to get a usable URL. I put it in as a comment in the spec. http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ast.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ast-5.7.2-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744944] Review Request: humanity-icon-theme - Humanity icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744944 --- Comment #5 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com 2011-10-14 14:09:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Your way to generate the tarball isn't canonical. In my mind, you should use the original tarball and run your script in %build. This makes it easier to get the checksum for the tarball. I'm just following this page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code I can't embed the original tarball in the source RPM because it contains nonfree items (Ubuntu logo is copyrighted). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745510] Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510 Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dougsl...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dougsl...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697326] Review Request: libisoburn - Library to enable creation and expansion of ISO-9660 filesystems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697326 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-14 15:56:32 EDT --- libisoburn-1.1.6-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libisoburn-1.1.6-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697326] Review Request: libisoburn - Library to enable creation and expansion of ISO-9660 filesystems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697326 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-14 15:55:45 EDT --- libisoburn-1.1.6-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libisoburn-1.1.6-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697326] Review Request: libisoburn - Library to enable creation and expansion of ISO-9660 filesystems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697326 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697326] Review Request: libisoburn - Library to enable creation and expansion of ISO-9660 filesystems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697326 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-14 15:56:57 EDT --- libisoburn-1.1.6-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libisoburn-1.1.6-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676335] Review Request: dmtcp - Checkpoint/Restart functionality for Linux processes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335 Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tstcl...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tstcl...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730970] Review Request: jhdf5 - Java HDF5 Object Package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730970 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akurt...@redhat.com Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742729] Review Request: php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms - A replication and load balancing plugin for mysqlnd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742729 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2011-10-14 16:53:34 EDT --- Update to 1.1.1 https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/21f418970a4bd9f17655bcdd2f6ef4120b7c086a SRPM: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pecl-mysqlnd-ms-1.1.1-1.remi.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 687987] Review Request: plymouth-theme-hot-dog - Plymouth Happy Hot Dog Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687987 Robin R. Price II rpr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rpr...@redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Robin R. Price II rpr...@redhat.com 2011-10-14 17:14:06 EDT --- Do your enterprise install a favor or impress your friends with: http://people.redhat.com/rprice/hot-dog/plymouth-theme-hot-dog-0.4-2.el6.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/rprice/hot-dog/plymouth-theme-hot-dog.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 687987] Review Request: plymouth-theme-hot-dog - Plymouth Happy Hot Dog Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687987 David Nalley da...@gnsa.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2011-10-14 17:17:28 EDT --- APPROVED Thanks for working on this Will. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742388] Review Request: polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742388 --- Comment #5 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2011-10-14 17:50:43 EDT --- A problem with building the existing python-polybori package on secondary arches was discovered and patched by Dan Horák. I have updated this package to have the same fix, but did not bump the release number. The URLs have not changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746368] New: Review Request: dnssec-nodes - DNS Visualization Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-nodes - DNS Visualization Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746368 Summary: Review Request: dnssec-nodes - DNS Visualization Tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wjhns...@hardakers.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/temp/dnssec-nodes.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/temp/dnssec-nodes-1.11.p1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: A graphical DNS visualization application, specializing in DNSSEC. The DNSSEC-Nodes application is a graphical debugging utility that allows administrators to watch the data being logged into a libval or bind logging file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711895] Review Request: softhsm - Software version of a PKCS#11 Hardware Security Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711895 Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 711895] Review Request: softhsm - Software version of a PKCS#11 Hardware Security Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711895 Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||wjhns...@hardakers.net AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wjhns...@hardakers.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739856] Review Request: opendbx - abstraction library for database access in C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739856
--- Comment #11 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-10-14 22:49:35
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Taking it for review as I am a sponsor.
The %dir %{_libdir}/opendbx should be only in the base package and not
duplicated in all of the backend subpackages.
Why?
In cases, packages sharing directories depend upon each other in a strict
hierarchic dependency, having a base package own the shared-directory and the
backends/plugins not owning it is _one possible option_.
The alternative is to let _all_, base and backends/plugins packages, which
use this shared directory to let them own it.
It's up to the discretion of the packager to choose from these approaches.
In general, the second approach is much more flexible, general and superior
approach. It is the only applicable approach when there is no strict hierarchy
Classic example for such a case would be a plugin/backends system being used by
several, independent frontends - Then sharing ownership of directories is
mandatory.
Real world example for such a case in fedora is the perl-modules: Each
perl-module package m must own all directories it owns, because there is no
fixed, strict dependency between them.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567086] Review Request: VXL - C++ Libraries for Computer Vision Research and Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567086 --- Comment #32 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-10-15 00:52:53 EDT --- Richard, Please go ahead and take over the review if you'd like to. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716344] Review Request: elmer - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716344 Bug 716344 depends on bug 715618, which changed state. Bug 715618 Summary: Review Request: elmer-eio - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715618 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715620] Review Request: elmer-fem - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715620 Bug 715620 depends on bug 715618, which changed state. Bug 715618 Summary: Review Request: elmer-eio - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715618 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716344] Review Request: elmer - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716344 Bug 716344 depends on bug 715620, which changed state. Bug 715620 Summary: Review Request: elmer-fem - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715620 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715503] Review Request: elmer-meshgen2d - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715503 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-10-15 00:57:40 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-10-15 00:57:40 EDT --- Hi, I'm not working on -medical related packages anymore and will not be pursuing this review ticket. If someone else wishes to take up the review, please open a new ticket. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715620] Review Request: elmer-fem - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715620 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-10-15 00:58:17 --- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-10-15 00:58:17 EDT --- Hi, I'm not working on -medical related packages anymore and will not be pursuing this review ticket. If someone else wishes to take up the review, please open a new ticket. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720121] Review Request: GoFigure2 - a software for visualizing, processing and analysing of bioimages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720121 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-10-15 00:58:41 --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-10-15 00:58:41 EDT --- Hi, I'm not working on -medical related packages anymore and will not be pursuing this review ticket. If someone else wishes to take up the review, please open a new ticket. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715618] Review Request: elmer-eio - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715618 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-10-15 00:58:03 --- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-10-15 00:58:03 EDT --- Hi, I'm not working on -medical related packages anymore and will not be pursuing this review ticket. If someone else wishes to take up the review, please open a new ticket. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715620] Review Request: elmer-fem - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715620 Bug 715620 depends on bug 715498, which changed state. Bug 715498 Summary: Review Request: elmer-hutiter - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715498 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710212] Review Request: dcm4che - A DICOM implementation in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710212 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-10-15 00:58:58 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-10-15 00:58:58 EDT --- Hi, I'm not working on -medical related packages anymore and will not be pursuing this review ticket. If someone else wishes to take up the review, please open a new ticket. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716344] Review Request: elmer - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716344 Bug 716344 depends on bug 715619, which changed state. Bug 715619 Summary: Review Request: elmer-elmergrid - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715619 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715620] Review Request: elmer-fem - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715620 Bug 715620 depends on bug 715619, which changed state. Bug 715619 Summary: Review Request: elmer-elmergrid - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715619 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715619] Review Request: elmer-elmergrid - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715619 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-10-15 00:58:06 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-10-15 00:58:06 EDT --- Hi, I'm not working on -medical related packages anymore and will not be pursuing this review ticket. If someone else wishes to take up the review, please open a new ticket. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715496] Review Request: elmer-matc - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715496 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-10-15 00:57:39 --- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-10-15 00:57:39 EDT --- Hi, I'm not working on -medical related packages anymore and will not be pursuing this review ticket. If someone else wishes to take up the review, please open a new ticket. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715498] Review Request: elmer-hutiter - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715498 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-10-15 00:57:37 --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-10-15 00:57:37 EDT --- Hi, I'm not working on -medical related packages anymore and will not be pursuing this review ticket. If someone else wishes to take up the review, please open a new ticket. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716344] Review Request: elmer - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716344 Bug 716344 depends on bug 715498, which changed state. Bug 715498 Summary: Review Request: elmer-hutiter - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715498 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED Bug 716344 depends on bug 715496, which changed state. Bug 715496 Summary: Review Request: elmer-matc - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715496 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715620] Review Request: elmer-fem - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715620 Bug 715620 depends on bug 715496, which changed state. Bug 715496 Summary: Review Request: elmer-matc - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715496 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED Bug 715620 depends on bug 715503, which changed state. Bug 715503 Summary: Review Request: elmer-meshgen2d - Open Source Finite Element Software for Multiphysical Problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715503 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726201] Review Request: Ginkgo-CADx - An extensible multi-platform Open Source Medical Imaging software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726201 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-10-15 00:58:53 Bug 726201 depends on bug 720140, which changed state. Bug 720140 Summary: Modify FindDCMTK.cmake to enable us to use the fedora DCMTK package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720140 What|Old Value |New Value Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-10-15 00:58:53 EDT --- Hi, I'm not working on -medical related packages anymore and will not be pursuing this review ticket. If someone else wishes to take up the review, please open a new ticket. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732232] Review Request: ledgersmb - Financial accounting program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732232 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-10-15 01:00:40 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-10-15 01:00:40 EDT --- Hi, I'm not working on -medical related packages anymore and will not be pursuing this review ticket. If someone else wishes to take up the review, please open a new ticket. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710995] Review Request: kradview - An image viewer oriented to images obtained by X-Ray machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710995 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-10-15 00:59:45 --- Comment #14 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-10-15 00:59:45 EDT --- Hi, I'm not working on -medical related packages anymore and will not be pursuing this review ticket. If someone else wishes to take up the review, please open a new ticket. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730691] Review Request: openemr - Practice management, EMR, prescription writing and medical billing application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730691 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-10-15 01:00:02 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-10-15 01:00:02 EDT --- Hi, I'm not working on -medical related packages anymore and will not be pursuing this review ticket. If someone else wishes to take up the review, please open a new ticket. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715154] Review Request: o-palm - A coupler for all the applications built upon existing independent models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715154 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-10-15 00:59:46 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-10-15 00:59:46 EDT --- Hi, I'm not working on -medical related packages anymore and will not be pursuing this review ticket. If someone else wishes to take up the review, please open a new ticket. Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
