[Bug 912816] Review Request: kyua-testers - Scriptable tester interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912816 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|cicku...@gmail.com | --- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Julio Merino from comment #7) Yes, it's more like a warning now for packagers. Hope will Mario will do the review soon. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033800] Review Request: rubygem-pkgwat - Check your gems against Fedora/EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033800 --- Comment #4 from Achilleas Pipinellis axill...@archlinux.gr --- (In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #3) (In reply to Achilleas Pipinellis from comment #2) Looks good, APPROVED. One minor detail: removal of Gemfile/Rakefile could go in %prep but that's not a stopper, do as you wish. Well, it's happening in %prep already :) See https://github.com/axilleas/fedora/commit/ fff1092a5a6261b751a565fb3c8089e7ebe86ff2 Oops, you're right! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033413] Review Request: smuxi - An user-friendly IRC client based on GNOME/GTK+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033413 --- Comment #3 from Mirco Bauer mmmba...@gnome.org --- The needed Mono version is lower (= 2.6) if you disable the JabbR engine. In the Debian source package I detect if Mono is current enough and enable/disable the JabbR version, e.g.: https://github.com/meebey/smuxi/blob/master/debian/rules#L9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033413] Review Request: smuxi - An user-friendly IRC client based on GNOME/GTK+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033413 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Mirco Bauer from comment #3) The needed Mono version is lower (= 2.6) if you disable the JabbR engine. In the Debian source package I detect if Mono is current enough and enable/disable the JabbR version, e.g.: https://github.com/meebey/smuxi/blob/master/debian/rules#L9 I want to bring more functions to users, and in fact, Fedora mono will be updated to 3.2.3 soon(Yes, we are only waiting for arm hfp support ready). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033413] Review Request: smuxi - An user-friendly IRC client based on GNOME/GTK+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033413 --- Comment #5 from Mirco Bauer mmmba...@gnome.org --- I understand, but I didn't mean to disable JabbR always, only if the Mono version is too old. Which Mono version is in fedora currently? Maybe I can supply a patch that allows to build it on that version then... With Mono 3.2 on armhf, oh yes that will make smuxi-server on raspberry pi awesome :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033413] Review Request: smuxi - An user-friendly IRC client based on GNOME/GTK+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033413 --- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Mirco Bauer from comment #5) I understand, but I didn't mean to disable JabbR always, only if the Mono version is too old. Which Mono version is in fedora currently? Maybe I can supply a patch that allows to build it on that version then... With Mono 3.2 on armhf, oh yes that will make smuxi-server on raspberry pi awesome :-) You can search mono-devel in http://pkgs.org to get the information. This website is very helpful for comparing pkg version in different distros. Very old now: [rpmaker@fab dev]$ rpm -qa |grep mono-devel mono-devel-2.10.8-5.fc20.i686 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033413] Review Request: smuxi - An user-friendly IRC client based on GNOME/GTK+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033413 Mirco Bauer mmmba...@gnome.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|mmmba...@gnome.org | CC||mmmba...@gnome.org --- Comment #7 from Mirco Bauer mmmba...@gnome.org --- I am not aware of any build issues with Smuxi 0.9 on Mono 2.10.8, that is what Debian Stable and Testing contains and successfully compiled Smuxi 0.9. So do you have a compile issue? (because of your comment it needs a newer version to compile) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821406] Review Request: eiskaltdcpp - QT Direct Connect client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821406 --- Comment #22 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- Sources use various licenses (BSD, GPLv2+ and GPLv3+). You must clarify this in spec. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source_Licensing_Scenario Also EiskaltDC++ uses bunlded miniupnpc and jsoncpp. These packages allready is in Fedora. You must explicity remove them in %prep stage https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Treatment_Of_Bundled_Libraries#Packages_with_Bundled_Libraries https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033413] Review Request: smuxi - An user-friendly IRC client based on GNOME/GTK+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033413 --- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Just had the dinner. Well build is aborted: + ./configure --build=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --host=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --disable-dependency-tracking --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/var/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-frontend-stfl checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /usr/bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether make supports nested variables... yes checking whether UID '1000' is supported by ustar format... yes checking whether GID '1000' is supported by ustar format... yes checking how to create a ustar tar archive... gnutar checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking build system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnu checking host system type... i686-redhat-linux-gnu checking how to print strings... printf checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-gcc... no checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking for suffix of executables... checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking dependency style of gcc... none checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E checking for fgrep... /usr/bin/grep -F checking for ld used by gcc... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for BSD- or MS-compatible name lister (nm)... /usr/bin/nm -B checking the name lister (/usr/bin/nm -B) interface... BSD nm checking whether ln -s works... yes checking the maximum length of command line arguments... 1572864 checking whether the shell understands some XSI constructs... yes checking whether the shell understands +=... yes checking how to convert i686-redhat-linux-gnu file names to i686-redhat-linux-gnu format... func_convert_file_noop checking how to convert i686-redhat-linux-gnu file names to toolchain format... func_convert_file_noop checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-objdump... no checking for objdump... objdump checking how to recognize dependent libraries... pass_all checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-dlltool... no checking for dlltool... no checking how to associate runtime and link libraries... printf %s\n checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-ar... no checking for ar... ar checking for archiver @FILE support... @ checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-strip... no checking for strip... strip checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-ranlib... no checking for ranlib... ranlib checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from gcc object... ok checking for sysroot... no checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-mt... no checking for mt... no checking if : is a manifest tool... no checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking for dlfcn.h... yes checking for objdir... .libs checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC -DPIC checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes checking if gcc static flag -static works... no checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes checking whether the gcc linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... no checking whether NLS is requested... yes checking for intltool = 0.25... 0.50.2 found checking for intltool-update... /usr/bin/intltool-update checking for intltool-merge... /usr/bin/intltool-merge checking for intltool-extract... /usr/bin/intltool-extract checking
[Bug 1033413] Review Request: smuxi - An user-friendly IRC client based on GNOME/GTK+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033413 --- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Ignore the last comment. If I set build without jabbr support, the build process is perfect. So I just need a 4.0 compiler now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033848] Review Request: greenisland - Compositor and shell for the Hawaii desktop environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033848 Marek Mahut mma...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mma...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mma...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905240] Review Request: rubygem-log4r - Comprehensive and flexible logging library for ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905240 --- Comment #7 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org --- New activity on this bug ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033413] Review Request: smuxi - An user-friendly IRC client based on GNOME/GTK+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033413 --- Comment #10 from Mirco Bauer mmmba...@gnome.org --- You can override the compiler with: ./configure MCS=/usr/bin/dmcs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033848] Review Request: greenisland - Compositor and shell for the Hawaii desktop environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033848 --- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut mma...@redhat.com --- Scratch build evaluted http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6219031 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 970896] Review Request: sugar-paths - A sliding tile game to create closed paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970896 --- Comment #16 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com --- SPEC file: http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-paths/sugar-paths.spec SRPM file: http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-paths/sugar-paths-19-3.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033848] Review Request: greenisland - Compositor and shell for the Hawaii desktop environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033848 Marek Mahut mma...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Marek Mahut mma...@redhat.com --- This package looks sane, thank you for your review request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894482] Review Request: rubygem-openshift-origin-auth-kerberos - OpenShift plugin for kerberos auth service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894482
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(m...@zarb.org)|
--- Comment #21 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
A few issue to fix, once they are fixed, i will approve the package.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly. This part couldn't be tested because
of a bug in openshift-broker rpm, see #1033928
- mocha is not really used or needed, so it should be dropped from Requires
- same goes for json, not used anywhere in the code, should be dropped in
gemspec
and Requires
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
licenses manually.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Ruby:
[x]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform
independent under %{gem_dir}.
[x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage
[x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated.
[x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name}
[x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel.
[x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro.
[x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch
[x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi).
[x]: Package contains Requires: ruby(release).
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary
[Bug 1033848] Review Request: greenisland - Compositor and shell for the Hawaii desktop environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033848 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk --- Thank you Marek! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: greenisland Short Description: Compositor and shell for the Hawaii desktop environment Owners: lkundrak cicku plfiorini Branches: f18 f19 f20 el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894482] Review Request: rubygem-openshift-origin-auth-kerberos - OpenShift plugin for kerberos auth service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894482 --- Comment #22 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org --- See https://github.com/openshift/origin-server/pull/4242 also, not sure if we want to keep in sync the spec file, and how -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 564537] Review Request: grc - simple python logfile colouriser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564537 --- Comment #10 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no --- Hi Carl, still interest in this package? There is 1.5 release available upstream. Are you sponsored? @Buland, are you going to start the review any time soon? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 981707] Review Request: bmon - bandwidth monitor and rate estimator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981707 --- Comment #13 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no --- Thomas, can you please push bmon to stable? Or any reason to keep it in testing for many weeks? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 761063] Review Request: cover_grabber - Download album cover art
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761063 --- Comment #13 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no --- Still any interest or should this request be closed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766932] Review Request: icfg - utiltiy for scriptable editing of network interface files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766932 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-11-24 08:43:00 --- Comment #22 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no --- Package seems to imported and available in repos, closing ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 970896] Review Request: sugar-paths - A sliding tile game to create closed paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970896 --- Comment #17 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- [!]: Final provides and requires are sane. [rpmaker@fab Paths-19]$ grep env * -R genpieces.py:#!/usr/bin/env python path.py:#!/usr/bin/env python [?]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/locale/quz, /usr/share/locale/mvo/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/tzm/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/ayc/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/fa_AF, /usr/share/locale/hus, /usr/share/locale/quz/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/tzo, /usr/share/locale/tzm, /usr/share/locale/fa_AF/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/hus/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/ayc, /usr/share/locale/tzo/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/mvo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 997679] Rename Request: sfml - Simple and Fast Multimedia Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997679 --- Comment #39 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- If there's still interest in moving forward with this rename request, the remaining item from comment 31 and comment 23 is to present an updated spec and src.rpm for review based on the latest http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/SFML.git/tree/ with proper Obsoletes/Provides pairs - possibly considering bug 1033924 (SFML 2.1 upgrade request). This is the only hurdle left for the renaming. ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 977128] Review Request: nodejs-grunt - The JavaScript Task Runner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977128 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #8 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org --- It seems this package is reviewed. Could it please added to the repositories too? :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912816] Review Request: kyua-testers - Scriptable tester interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912816 --- Comment #9 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- Scratch build fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6219513 It is due to an unresolvable dependency in Rawhide: DEBUG util.py:266: Error: Package: kyua-cli-0.5-3.fc19.i686 (build) DEBUG util.py:266: Requires: liblutok.so.0 New attempt for f20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6219521 Same dependency problem there. The current lutok-0.3 package has liblutok.so.2, the mentioned liblutok.so.0 is in the f19 package only. Seems to be a problem in kyua-cli, which pulls lutok. It has to be resolved before we can continue on this review. There are still f19 packages for kyua-cli in Rawhide, so I assume it has build problems. And last but not least an issue from build.log: »warning: bogus date in %changelog: Mon Feb 19 2013 Julio Merino ju...@meroh.net 0.1-1« -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518317] Review Request: perdition - Mail Retrieval Proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518317 --- Comment #37 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info --- Ok, let it be Changes: https://github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/commit/d107557be9dd7ff14936e9946ce7563d2d12340e Spec: https://raw.github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/d107557be9dd7ff14936e9946ce7563d2d12340e/SPECS/perdition.spec Srpm: http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora20/perdition/perdition-2.0-4.fc20.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6219551 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1027187] Review Request: rubygem-coercible - Powerful, flexible and configurable coercion library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027187 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- Rubygem-backports has been build for f20 and imported in Bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21697/rubygem-backports-3.3.4-1.fc20 So I assume we can set the ON_QA status for this ticket now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912816] Review Request: kyua-testers - Scriptable tester interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912816 --- Comment #10 from Julio Merino julio+red...@meroh.net --- So the issue with kyua-cli is that somebody attempted to upgrade it to 0.6, committed the results, but I guess didn't even try to build the package. kyua-cli-0.6 requires kyua-testers, so no new versions can be built against the right version of liblutok at the moment. Question: Is it an OK procedure if I revert the bogus update of kyua-cli to 0.5 and rebuild a working version? Because no binaries have been built for 0.6 yet, I suppose this is fine. Alternatively I'd tweak the initial addition of kyua-testers to not require kyua-cli. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 954074] Review Request: RemoteBox - Open Source VirtualBox Client with Remote Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|RemoteBox-1.6-2.fc20|RemoteBox-1.1-1.el6 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- RemoteBox-1.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912816] Review Request: kyua-testers - Scriptable tester interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912816 --- Comment #11 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- Don't understand completely. The kyua-testers package is needed for updating kyua to 0.6, but we require kyua-cli. This is an unresolvable ping-pong dependency, as far as I can evaluate. As you see in the scratch builds, they fail already with kyua-cli-0.5. I'm a bit confused about this situation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033961] New: Review Request: powerline - The ultimate statusline/prompt utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033961 Bug ID: 1033961 Summary: Review Request: powerline - The ultimate statusline/prompt utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: a...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/powerline/powerline.spec SRPM URL: http://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/powerline/powerline-0.0.1.20131123gitdb80fc-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Powerline is a statusline plugin for vim, and provides statuslines and prompts for several other applications, including zsh, bash, tmux, IPython, Awesome and Qtile. https://github.com/Lokaltog/powerline Fedora Account System Username: asn -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1031342] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-freedreno - xorg ddx driver for snapdragon/adreno arm SoC's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031342 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|hdego...@redhat.com --- Comment #20 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com --- Hi, (In reply to Xavier Bachelot from comment #19) I know the perfect reviewer for this package. Hans, I hope you don't mind me dropping some (more) work on your shoulders ;-) Ok, I'll bite, I'm now yum distro-syncing my trimslice to F-20, when that is done I'll review this (likely tomorrow). Regards, Hans -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912816] Review Request: kyua-testers - Scriptable tester interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912816 --- Comment #12 from Julio Merino julio+red...@meroh.net --- kyua-testers _only_ needs kyua-cli because of the %check target in the spec file. Getting rid of that would also let us kill the BuildRequires stanza on kyua-cli and not introduce any cycles. But doing so means we lose the execution of the tests for kyua-testers during the build of a package; not a huge deal given that these can be run later via the -tests subpackage. The reason I sent it this way is because I thought that this could be OK as long as at least one build for kyua-cli existed in the tree. (This build could exist with kyua-cli-0.5 if fixed.) What do you suggest? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912816] Review Request: kyua-testers - Scriptable tester interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912816 --- Comment #13 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- I suggest to disable the %check section for the time being so that I can do a proper scratch build and approve your package, unless some other blocker issues come up. This way we get the package at least into Rawhide and you might re-enable the tests once kyua-cli has the right version. Well, we would have a ping-pong-scenario similar to that one I already mentioned, but it would work as long as both packages are available from the repos. Currently, with one repo package and one which has to be scratch-built it wouldn't work. Is this imagineable for you to do so? BTW, instead of disabling the checks you could add a condition which makes it more simple to switch them on and off: %global with_checks 1 Then, in the %check section itself, you use the if/then constructs to enable/disable it. Moreover, you are using the %define macro. In most cases, %global is the better choice. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033961] Review Request: powerline - The ultimate statusline/prompt utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033961
Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sso...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com ---
rpmlint complaints
| powerline.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US zsh - sh, ssh, ash
| powerline.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
powerline-0.0.1.20131123gitdb80fc.tar.gz
| 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
1 is obviously bogus
however 2 indicates some errors:
- Source0 is supposed to be the URL where to find the package, I suppose the
git tree when it is a checkout ?
- you should use %{checkout} in Version and set Checkout: 20131123gitdb80fc,
see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033961] Review Request: powerline - The ultimate statusline/prompt utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033961 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schneider a...@redhat.com --- * Sun Nov 24 2013 - Andreas Schneider a...@redhat.com - 0.0.1.20131123gitdb80fc-2 - Set checkout. - Set source url - Fix default configuration path. The spelling error is no error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033967] New: Review Request: SchellCheck - Tool for checking common errors in shell scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033967 Bug ID: 1033967 Summary: Review Request: SchellCheck - Tool for checking common errors in shell scripts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://bitbucket.org/dridi/fedora_packages/downloads/ShellCheck.spec SRPM URL: https://bitbucket.org/dridi/fedora_packages/downloads/ShellCheck-0.2.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: The goals of ShellCheck are: - To point out and clarify typical beginner's syntax issues, that causes a shell to give cryptic error messages. - To point out and clarify typical intermediate level semantic problems, that causes a shell to behave strangely and counter-intuitively. - To point out subtle caveats, corner cases and pitfalls, that may cause an advanced user's otherwise working script to fail under future circumstances. Fedora Account System Username: dridi Successful builds from f18 to f21: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6220156 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6220140 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6220101 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6220047 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033967] Review Request: SchellCheck - Tool for checking common errors in shell scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033967 Dridi Boukelmoune dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||SchellCheck -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033961] Review Request: powerline - The ultimate statusline/prompt utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033961 Michele Baldessari mich...@acksyn.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mich...@acksyn.org --- Comment #3 from Michele Baldessari mich...@acksyn.org --- Thanks for this package ;) Just a drive-by comment as a happy powerline user. You need to add python2-devel or python3-devel in the BuildRequires: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033961] Review Request: powerline - The ultimate statusline/prompt utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033961 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schneider a...@redhat.com --- I don't see why python-devel is needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033961] Review Request: powerline - The ultimate statusline/prompt utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033961 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com --- Here is a koji build with latest Andreas' package: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6220268 The only thing in the specfile that might need changing is that subpackages (vim-plugin-powerline and tmux-powerline) should require the main package with full NVR. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033961] Review Request: powerline - The ultimate statusline/prompt utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033961 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com --- python-devel is not needed, powerline is written entirely in Python, python-devel is normally needed for python bindings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 947640] Review Request: snappy-player - An open-source Gnome media player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947640 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- snappy-player-0.3.7-2.20131121git0bd0c0c3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snappy-player-0.3.7-2.20131121git0bd0c0c3.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 947640] Review Request: snappy-player - An open-source Gnome media player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947640 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- snappy-player-0.3.7-2.20131121git0bd0c0c3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snappy-player-0.3.7-2.20131121git0bd0c0c3.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1026376] Review Request: fontawesome-fonts - Iconic font set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026376 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org Blocks||1006575 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006575 [Bug 1006575] ipython: please package new upstream version (1.1) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033961] Review Request: powerline - The ultimate statusline/prompt utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033961 --- Comment #7 from Michele Baldessari mich...@acksyn.org --- Well I guess the Python guidelines need an update or fedora-review needs fixing then -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033970] New: Review Request: d52 - Disassemblers for 8051, 8048, and Z80 families
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033970 Bug ID: 1033970 Summary: Review Request: d52 - Disassemblers for 8051, 8048, and Z80 families Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: space...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/d52/d52.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/d52/d52-3.4.1-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: D52 is collection of disassemblers for the 8051, 8048, and Z80 families of microcontrollers and microprocessors. Fedora Account System Username: brouhaha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033975] New: Review Request: python-enum34 - Backport of Python 3.4 Enum
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033975 Bug ID: 1033975 Summary: Review Request: python-enum34 - Backport of Python 3.4 Enum Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: space...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/python-enum34/python-enum34.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/python-enum34/python-enum34-0.9.19-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Python 3.4 introduced official support for enumerations. This is a backport of that feature to Python 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 2.7, 2.5, 2.5, and 2.4. Fedora Account System Username: brouhaha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 970418] Review Request: mingw-flac - Free Lossless Audio Codec Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970418 František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||val...@civ.zcu.cz --- Comment #1 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz --- Hello, my observations of the packaging: 1) there were many changes in native package (source URL, descriptions, new version - currently 1.3.0, patches, build flags, ...). MinGW packages should follow the native packages as closely as possible. With the new version and different patches, it will probably need a lot changes... 2) I guess the macros mingw_build_win32 and mingw_build_win64 are not needed? 3) having just two static subpackages mingw32-flac-static and mingw64-flac-static would simplify the packaging (= merging C and C++ static subpackages), but that's mere suggestion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957529] Review Request: solaar - Device manager for Logitech Unifying Receiver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957529 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- solaar-0.9.2-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/solaar-0.9.2-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015765] Review Request: islamic-menus - Islamic menus for desktops conforming with xdg standards
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015765 --- Comment #16 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com --- Yes, This program (OTHMAN) needs islamic-menus: http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/sourceforge/o/oj/oji/repo/othman-0.2.7-1.oj5.noarch.html http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/sourceforge/o/oj/oji/repo/python-othman-0.2.7-1.oj5.noarch.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001028] Review Request: python-bna - Battle.net Authenticator routines in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001028 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-bna-3.2-2.fc20 |python-bna-3.2-2.fc19 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-bna-3.2-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033967] Review Request: SchellCheck - Tool for checking common errors in shell scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033967 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cicku...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033986] New: Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable - Routine for estimating syllable count in words
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033986 Bug ID: 1033986 Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable - Routine for estimating syllable count in words Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: r.landm...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable.spec SRPM URL: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable-0.251-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Lingua::EN::Syllable::syllable() estimates the number of syllables in the word passed to it. Fedora Account System Username: rlandmann rpmlint output: $ rpmlint SPECS/perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable.spec SRPMS/perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable-0.251-1.fc19.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable-0.251-1.fc19.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6220559 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033987] New: Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom - Measure readability of English text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033987 Bug ID: 1033987 Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom - Measure readability of English text Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: r.landm...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom.spec SRPM URL: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.15-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: This module analyses English text in either a string or file. Totals are then calculated for the number of characters, words, sentences, blank and non blank (text) lines and paragraphs. Fedora Account System Username: rlandmann rpmlint output: $ rpmlint SPECS/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom.spec SRPMS/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.15-1.fc19.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.15-1.fc19.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033987] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom - Measure readability of English text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033987 Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1033986 Whiteboard||NotReady Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033986 [Bug 1033986] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable - Routine for estimating syllable count in words -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033986] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable - Routine for estimating syllable count in words
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033986 Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1033987 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033987 [Bug 1033987] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom - Measure readability of English text -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 991689] Review Request: dislocker - Utility to access BitLocker encrypted volumes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991689 Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1033989 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033989 [Bug 1033989] Please build polarssl for EPEL 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 991689] Review Request: dislocker - Utility to access BitLocker encrypted volumes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991689 Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla@l | |inuxnetz.de)| --- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de --- Regarding the build issue on Rawhide: Since the initial review submission the newer PolarSSL 1.3 (including API changes) entered Fedora, however this is now fixed (to support both). The building for EL-5 is fixed as well, however there is no polarssl package for EL-5 so far; I filed bug #1033989 for that. Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/dislocker.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/dislocker-0.2.3-2.20130131git.src.rpm I guess the missing EL-5 dependency is not a real show stopper for the overall review so far? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 991689] Review Request: dislocker - Utility to access BitLocker encrypted volumes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991689 --- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- No. The blocker is that you must package the latest stable 0.3 OR checkout from git again. https://github.com/Aorimn/dislocker/releases -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912816] Review Request: kyua-testers - Scriptable tester interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912816 --- Comment #14 from Julio Merino julio+red...@meroh.net --- Alright, so: - Changed %define with %global. - Added a %_with_checks global, defaulting to 0 for now. - Updated the changelog entry, which apparently also fixes the date. Because of the new %_with_checks, it is not worth attempting to fix the current kyua-cli package. It's just easier and better to finish this package and properly update kyua-cli to 0.7 which should just work. New URLs (because of the SRPM name change): Spec URL: http://www.NetBSD.org/~jmmv/kyua-testers.spec SRPM URL: http://www.NetBSD.org/~jmmv/kyua-testers-0.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 991689] Review Request: dislocker - Utility to access BitLocker encrypted volumes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991689 --- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de --- Right, so here we go with an updated package. And I obviously did not yet run extensive tests with this new dislocker like it happened with 0.2.3 for 6+ months now. But my daily future usage will of course be done using this updated package: Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/dislocker.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/dislocker-0.3.1-1.20131102git.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819687] Review Request: python-rtkit - Python Api for Request Tracker's REST interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819687 --- Comment #28 from Tomas Dabašinskas tdaba...@redhat.com --- Hi Christopher, many thanks for the review and catching the %check I'm not in dire need to get the package out, but I agree let's get this package out and start working on packaging %check deps. I haven't bumped the spec version, just extended last rev message, the updated rpm: Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~tdabasin/python-rtkit/python-rtkit.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~tdabasin/python-rtkit/python-rtkit-0.6.0-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025012] Review Request: libetonyek - a library for import of Apple Keynote presentations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025012 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|dtar...@redhat.com |mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1020456] Review Request: vagrant - an automation tool used to manage development environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456 Stephen Gordon sgor...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sgor...@redhat.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1020456] Review Request: vagrant - an automation tool used to manage development environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456 Stephen Gordon sgor...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | --- Comment #6 from Stephen Gordon sgor...@redhat.com --- I've removed the review flag and set a block on the FE-NEEDSPONSOR bug as the specified FAS user 'adrahon' does not appear to be in the 'packager' group. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1020456] Review Request: vagrant - an automation tool used to manage development environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456 Stephen Gordon sgor...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|saga...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518317] Review Request: perdition - Mail Retrieval Proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518317 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #38 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- A belated approval. PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033986] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable - Routine for estimating syllable count in words
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033986 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cicku...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Question before review, do you want to support EL5? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033986] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable - Routine for estimating syllable count in words
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033986 --- Comment #2 from Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com --- Yeah, I'd like to make this available for EPEL5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015765] Review Request: islamic-menus - Islamic menus for desktops conforming with xdg standards
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015765 --- Comment #17 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033961] Review Request: powerline - The ultimate statusline/prompt utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033961
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
1. Please sort your spec for readability:
Move:
BuildRequires: python-setuptools python-sphinx fdupes fontconfig tmux
vim-minimal
BuildArch: noarch
after
Url:https://github.com/Lokaltog/powerline
2.
%define checkout 20131123gitdb80fc
--
%global checkout 20131123gitdb80fc
And ask upstream to tag the project.
3. %build
Add a note like
#nothing to build.
4. install with -p option to preserve the timestamp.
5. %fdupes %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}
What's this crap?
6. Just one line in %files:
%{_datadir}/%{name}
No need to
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/%{name}/fontpatcher-symbols.sfd
7. python setup.py install --prefix=%{_prefix} --root=%{buildroot} --optimize=1
Use:
%{__python2} setup.py install --prefix=%{_prefix} --root=%{buildroot}
--optimize=1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033986] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable - Routine for estimating syllable count in words
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033986
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 2 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck:
Unknown or generated
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/Lingua-EN-Syllable-0.251/Syllable.pm
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/Lingua-EN-Syllable-0.251/test.pl
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Lingua(perl-Lingua-Preferred, perl-Lingua-
Stem-Ru, perl-Lingua-Identify, perl-Lingua-Stem-It, perl-Lingua-EN-
Inflect, perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers-Ordinate, perl-Snowball-Norwegian, perl-
Snowball-Swedish, perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase, perl-Lingua-Stem-Fr,
perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers-Easy, perl-Lingua-EN-Alphabet-Shaw, perl-Lingua-
Flags, perl-Lingua-Stem, perl-Lingua-PT-Stemmer, perl-Lingua-StopWords,
perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball-Da, perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers),
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Lingua/EN(perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect, perl-
Lingua-EN-Numbers-Ordinate, perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers, perl-Lingua-EN-
Alphabet-Shaw, perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Phrase, perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers-
Easy)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Perl:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
[x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
[x]: If the source package does not
[Bug 564537] Review Request: grc - simple python logfile colouriser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564537 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- WARNING! https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/grc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1034017] Review Request: perl-Test-Name-FromLine - Auto fill test names from caller line
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034017 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1033481 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033481 [Bug 1033481] Review Request: perl-Test-Time - Overrides the time() and sleep() core functions for testing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033481] Review Request: perl-Test-Time - Overrides the time() and sleep() core functions for testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033481 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1034017 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034017 [Bug 1034017] Review Request: perl-Test-Name-FromLine - Auto fill test names from caller line -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1034017] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Name-FromLine - Auto fill test names from caller line
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034017 Bug ID: 1034017 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Name-FromLine - Auto fill test names from caller line Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: boche...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Name-FromLine.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Name-FromLine-0.11-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Test::Name::FromLine is test utility that fills test names from its file. Just use this module in test and this module fill test names to all test except named one. Fedora Account System Username: bochecha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033481] Review Request: perl-Test-Time - Overrides the time() and sleep() core functions for testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033481 --- Comment #2 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org --- Thanks for the feedback Petr. I've opened a new review request for Test::Name::FromLine. And here's a new package with the fixes. :) Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Time.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Time-0.04-2.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033967] Review Request: SchellCheck - Tool for checking common errors in shell scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033967 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|cicku...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1027512] Review Request: rubygem-tiltout - Tilt templates with layouts and helpers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027512 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Okay, no issue found. * Builds successfully on koji. * Spec file clean * Can be installed * At least the following works: $ ruby -e require 'tiltout' ; puts Tiltout::VERSION 1.4.0 - This package (rubygem-tiltout) is APPROVED by mtasaka - -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033961] Review Request: powerline - The ultimate statusline/prompt utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033961 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schneider a...@redhat.com --- Thanks for your comment. 1. Moved BuildArch, prefer BuildRequires on top! 2. done 3. done 4. -a now 5. no crap (man fdupes) 6. wont change, I prefer two or more 7. done -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1018090] Review Request: python-argcomplete - Bash tab completion for argparse
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018090 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-11-25 02:47:30 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1018092] Review Request: barman - Backup and Recovery Manager for PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018092 Bug 1018092 depends on bug 1018090, which changed state. Bug 1018090 Summary: Review Request: python-argcomplete - Bash tab completion for argparse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018090 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 991689] Review Request: dislocker - Utility to access BitLocker encrypted volumes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991689 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- 1. You can use tarball downloaded from tag and don't need to write down git in the release tag. 2. https://github.com/Aorimn/dislocker#readme just https://github.com/Aorimn/dislocker will be fine. I will review it formally later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
