[Bug 1103554] Review Request: CppCMS - a Free High Performance Web Development Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103554 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- This package has lot of issues. I do not want to sound too negative, but I fear it'll be a long and tiresome process to get this package into Fedora. Let start with pointing out a few selected issues. 1. Packaging: Please properly split the package into main and *-devel subpackages: - *.so.* belong into *-devel unless they are dlopened by name. - man3/ are devel doc and therefore belong into *-devel. - *.a are not supposed to be shipped in Fedora at all. - Please be more selective in %files sections. The way you have written them is very sensitive to accidentially picking up files a package is not supposed to contain (cf. *devel vs. main). 2. Contents: - Most of the man3/* manpages are junk and are likely to conflict with other packages. - The *-doc package contains a lot of files which are not supposed to be shipped. 3. Bundled libraries: This package bundles quite a number of sources from other origins (boost, json2*.js, sha1, etc.). Please modify the package to use external versions whenever possible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103545] Review Request: granite - GTK extensions for the elementary desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103545 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||i...@cicku.me Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i...@cicku.me Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060989] Review Request: ghc-io-streams - Simple, composable, easy-to-use stream I/O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060989 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Thanks for reviewing! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-io-streams Short Description: Simple composable stream I/O Upstream URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/io-streams Owners: petersen codeblock Branches: f20 f19 epel7 el6 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1064352] Review Request: rubygem-deep_merge - Merges deep hashes in ruby.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064352 --- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch --- Thanks for the pointer: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/rubygem-deep_merge/rubygem-deep_merge-1.0.1-3.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093095] Review Request: rubygem-sys-proctable - An interface for providing process table information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093095 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch --- http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/rubygem-sys-proctable/rubygem-sys-proctable-0.9.4_universal_linux-2.fc20.src.rpm update for latest ruby guidelines. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100926] Review Request: php-guzzlehttp-streams - Provides a simple abstraction over streams of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100926 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||fed...@famillecollet.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Created attachment 901382 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=901382action=edit phpci.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100926] Review Request: php-guzzlehttp-streams - Provides a simple abstraction over streams of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100926 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Created attachment 901383 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=901383action=edit review.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092431] Review Request: nanodesigner - 3D molecular editor and simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092431 --- Comment #4 from Florian Tani floriant...@gmail.com --- New URLs Spec URL: http://openlabs.cc/nanodesigner/Nanodesigner.spec SRPM URL: http://openlabs.cc/nanodesigner/Nanodesigner-O.1.2-1.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100926] Review Request: php-guzzlehttp-streams - Provides a simple abstraction over streams of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100926 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Match php-vendor-lib [x]: URL: https://github.com/guzzle/http Could use http://guzzlephp.org/ (from composer.json homepage) Both are fine for me. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Could drop the anchor from the link. No blockers. == APPROVED == -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102723] Review Request: kf5-kdnssd - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 1 integration module for DNS-SD services (Zeroconf)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102723 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-06-02 05:05:36 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087956] Review Request: ghc-wl-pprint - The Wadler/Leijen Pretty Printer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087956 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-wl-pprint-1.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-wl-pprint-1.1-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087956] Review Request: ghc-wl-pprint - The Wadler/Leijen Pretty Printer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087956 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-wl-pprint-1.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-wl-pprint-1.1-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087956] Review Request: ghc-wl-pprint - The Wadler/Leijen Pretty Printer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087956 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103034] Review Request: python-django-stopforumspam - Django middleware for blocking IPs listed in stopforumspam.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103034 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103034] Review Request: python-django-stopforumspam - Django middleware for blocking IPs listed in stopforumspam.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103034 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-django-stopforumspam-1.4.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-stopforumspam-1.4.1-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1075605] Review Request: ghc-distributive - Haskell 98 Distributive functors -- Dual to Traversable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075605 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #1) I can update this I am happy to review. :) Sorry: If you can update this, I am happy to review... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1096704] Review Request: python-bintrees - Binary-, RedBlack- and AVL-Trees in Python and Cython
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096704 Robert Kuska rku...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Robert Kuska rku...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-bintrees Short Description: Binary-, RedBlack- and AVL-Trees in Python and Cython Upstream URL: http://bitbucket.org/mozman/bintrees Owners: rkuska Branches: f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 542416] Review Request: yagtd - Yet Another Getting Things Done
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542416 --- Comment #20 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- any progress here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103226] Review Request: antlr32 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103226
--- Comment #3 from Mat Booth mat.bo...@redhat.com ---
Thanks for the review.
(In reply to Pete MacKinnon from comment #2)
MUST:
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/java/antlr32
Hmm, I'm not sure why this is reported, the java subpackage should own this. In
the spec file, you should see this:
%files java -f .mfiles-java
%doc tool/LICENSE.txt
%dir %{_datadir}/java/%{name}
The %dir line should expand to /usr/share/java/antlr32
Do you have any thoughts about what is wrong here?
SHOULD:
[!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
It would be nice to have a link to the JIRA where Java 8 patch originated.
Good point, I will add a link to the upstream commit.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 923959] Review Request: JOrtho - A spell checker for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923959 Christian von Behren vonbehre...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vonbehre...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Christian von Behren vonbehre...@gmail.com --- I hope someone will track this down for me... The updated package version is missing some dictionaries! /usr/share/java/jortho.jar references SIX languages in dictionaries.cnf: extension=.ortho languages=de,en,it,fr,es,ru The dictionaries shipped with this package is just ONE: dictionary_en.ortho! When I open Freemind I get an error: java.io.FileNotFoundException: JAR entry dictionary_de.ortho not found in /usr/share/java/jortho.jar Any ideas how to fix that? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103554] Review Request: CppCMS - a Free High Performance Web Development Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103554 Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103420] Review Request: autowrap - Generates Python Extension modules from [Cython] PXD files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103420 --- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Björn besser82 Esser from comment #3) Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: Unknown or generated. 47 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/besser82/shared/fedora/review/1103420-python- autowrap/licensecheck.txt --- please ask upstream to prepend the actual license to the source-files. did you even read the LICENSE-file *BEFORE* packaging?!? License: GPLv3+ (spec) vs. License: BSD (LICENSE-file in src) Please refer to the process mentioned in: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification I had not checked License file; it was a my mistake. https://github.com/uweschmitt/autowrap/issues/6 SPEC: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/python-autowrap/autowrap.spec SRPM: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/python-autowrap/autowrap-0.4.0-3.20140321git26e901.fc20.src.rpm - Removed conditional macros for EPEL - Fixed Source0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103420] Review Request: autowrap - Generates Python Extension modules from [Cython] PXD files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103420 --- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com --- Koji build in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6917582 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 173040] Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=173040 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 173040] Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=173040 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1054394] Review Request: python-django-admin-bootstrapped - Bootstrap support for Django projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054394 Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|mru...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 229417] Review Request: python-qpid - qpid's python implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229417 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Added you to commiters but am unable to unorphan, investigating. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 229417] Review Request: python-qpid - qpid's python implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229417 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060989] Review Request: ghc-io-streams - Simple, composable, easy-to-use stream I/O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060989 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060989] Review Request: ghc-io-streams - Simple, composable, easy-to-use stream I/O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060989 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1096704] Review Request: python-bintrees - Binary-, RedBlack- and AVL-Trees in Python and Cython
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096704 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1096704] Review Request: python-bintrees - Binary-, RedBlack- and AVL-Trees in Python and Cython
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096704 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100899] Review Request: ratools - Framework for IPv6 Router Advertisements
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100899 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103543] Review Request: python-pyramid-chameleon - Bindings for the Chameleon templating system in the Pyramid web framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103543 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103543] Review Request: python-pyramid-chameleon - Bindings for the Chameleon templating system in the Pyramid web framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103543 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100899] Review Request: ratools - Framework for IPv6 Router Advertisements
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100899 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103226] Review Request: antlr32 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103226 Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com --- $ rpm -qf /usr/share/java/antlr32 antlr32-java-3.2-1.fc20.noarch Hmm, false positive from fedora-review 0.5.1 for some reason. Sorry about that... APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102941] Review Request: php-pclzip - Compression and extraction functions for Zip formatted archives
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102941 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||fed...@famillecollet.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Created attachment 901455 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=901455action=edit phpci.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102941] Review Request: php-pclzip - Compression and extraction functions for Zip formatted archives
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102941 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Created attachment 901456 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=901456action=edit review.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102941] Review Request: php-pclzip - Compression and extraction functions for Zip formatted archives
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102941
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
[!]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
Use %{?dist} instead of %{dist}
[!] rpmlint
php-pclzip.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/php-pclzip/gnu-lgpl.txt
Should be reported to upstream
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
Ok, but this version was released 5 years ago
This project seems dead.
You should understand you will probably have to maintain it in case of bug
Please fix %{?dist} on import
No blocker
== APPROVED ==
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103226] Review Request: antlr32 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103226 Mat Booth mat.bo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Mat Booth mat.bo...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: antlr32 Short Description: ANother Tool for Language Recognition Upstream URL: http://www.antlr3.org/ Owners: mbooth Branches: f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103226] Review Request: antlr32 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103226 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103226] Review Request: antlr32 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103226 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103466] Review Request: perl-Net-Statsd - Sends statistics to the stats daemon over UDP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103466 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086445] Review Request: dbusmenu-qt5 - A Qt 5 implementation of the DBusMenu protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086445 Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jgrul...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103466] Review Request: perl-Net-Statsd - Sends statistics to the stats daemon over UDP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103466 --- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- You're missing the usual perl BR. Also, Time::HiRes isn't needed for anything. It's only mentioned in POD. The rest looks okay to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 692733] Review Request: openvas-cli - Command-line tool to drive OpenVAS Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692733 Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(re...@seznam.cz) | --- Comment #10 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz --- Thanks Fabian, here is update to OpenVAS7 openvas-cli version 1.3.0 SPEC: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~rebus/SPECS/openvas-cli.spec SRPM: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~rebus/SRPMS/openvas-cli-1.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Best regards Michal Ambroz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1098778] Review Request: perl-Redis - Perl binding for Redis database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098778 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103543] Review Request: python-pyramid-chameleon - Bindings for the Chameleon templating system in the Pyramid web framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103543 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-06-02 11:03:52 --- Comment #7 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org --- Thanks for the review Kevin, and thank you for the git Jon! Package built, closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103226] Review Request: antlr32 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103226 Mat Booth mat.bo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||antlr32-3.2-3.fc21 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-06-02 11:28:22 --- Comment #7 from Mat Booth mat.bo...@redhat.com --- Successfully built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=520948 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092431] Review Request: nanodesigner - 3D molecular editor and simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092431 --- Comment #5 from Florian Tani floriant...@gmail.com --- Thank you for your feedback. Actually i have to packaged as Java application so i will revised in depth .spec file . i will test,build in Mock and Koji before i update the package. (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #3) http://openlabs.cc/nanodesigner/Nanodesigner.spec That spec file is very unusual, because it builds a package that only includes two %doc files: | %files | %doc README COPYING Have you done a test-build of this packge yet? With Mock or in koji (by following the Join process: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers ). Also consider pointing the fedora-review tool at this ticket. Run fedora-review -b 1092431 and let it perform many helpful checks on your package(s). Keep the Spec URL: and SRPM URL: lines accurate, since the fedora-review tool downloads the files from those URLs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103420] Review Request: autowrap - Generates Python Extension modules from [Cython] PXD files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103420 --- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com --- New commit; fixed license headers. SPEC: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/python-autowrap/autowrap.spec SRPM: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/python-autowrap/autowrap-0.4.0-4.20140602gitebde9f.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877096] Review Request: perl-Fsdb - A set of commands for manipulating flat-text databases from the shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877096 John Heidemann jo...@isi.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055366] Review Request: snapraid - Disk array backup for many large rarely-changed files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055366 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|snapraid-6.1-3.fc20 |snapraid-6.1-3.el6 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- snapraid-6.1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1078364] Review Request: js-sizzle - A pure-JavaScript CSS selector engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078364 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t...@compton.nu Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1078364] Review Request: js-sizzle - A pure-JavaScript CSS selector engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078364
--- Comment #7 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[?]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
---
Checking: js-sizzle-1.10.19-2.fc21.noarch.rpm
[Bug 1103852] New: Review Request: drupal7-site_map - This module provides a site map that gives visitors an overview of your site
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103852 Bug ID: 1103852 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-site_map - This module provides a site map that gives visitors an overview of your site Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: peter.bo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal7-site_map.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal7-site_map-1.2-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: This module provides a site map that gives visitors an overview of your site. Fedora Account System Username: asrob -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1078364] Review Request: js-sizzle - A pure-JavaScript CSS selector engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078364 --- Comment #8 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu --- I haven't managed to run the tests, but other than that this generally looks good. I think the only problem I can see is that the source URL does not comply with the rules at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github for packaging from github. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 928841] Review Request: drupal7-theme-zen - Zen is a powerful, yet simple, HTML5 starting theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928841 Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter.bo...@gmail.com --- Comment #23 from Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com --- *** Bug 1103453 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103453] Review Request: drupal7-zen - Zen is a powerful, yet simple, HTML5 starting theme with a responsive, mobile-first grid design
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103453 Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2014-06-02 14:40:06 --- Comment #1 from Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 928841 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 908088] Review Request: ascend - ASCEND modelling environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908088 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #24 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- OK, looks like we have a winner, APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103875] New: Review Request: openstack-tempest - set of integration tests to be run against a live OpenStack cluster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103875 Bug ID: 1103875 Summary: Review Request: openstack-tempest - set of integration tests to be run against a live OpenStack cluster Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: slina...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://file.rdu.redhat.com/~slinaber/openstack-tempest.spec SRPM URL: http://file.rdu.redhat.com/~slinaber/openstack-tempest-0.0.1-ee7ce47.fc20.src.rpm Description: This is a set of integration tests to be run against a live OpenStack cluster. Tempest has batteries of tests for OpenStack API validation, Scenarios, and other specific tests useful in validating an OpenStack deployment. Fedora Account System Username: slinabery -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103875] Review Request: openstack-tempest - set of integration tests to be run against a live OpenStack cluster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103875 --- Comment #1 from Steve Linabery slina...@redhat.com --- scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6919027 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 908088] Review Request: ascend - ASCEND modelling environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908088 Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com --- Thank you very much Rex. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ascend Short Description: ASCEND modelling environment Upstream URL: http://ascend4.org/ Owners: sagitter Branches: f20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 928609] Review Request: xpra - screen for X
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|kwiz...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | --- Comment #40 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com --- Ok, sorry but I was not the right person for review swap. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1030755] Review Request: python-livereload - LiveReload server in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030755 Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #3 from Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com --- Releasing, feel free to ping me if you want to continue review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103897] New: Review Request: python-rxjson - JSON RX Schema validation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103897 Bug ID: 1103897 Summary: Review Request: python-rxjson - JSON RX Schema validation tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: boche...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-rxjson.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-rxjson-0.2-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: JSON RX Schema validation tool. Fedora Account System Username: bochecha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103543] Review Request: python-pyramid-chameleon - Bindings for the Chameleon templating system in the Pyramid web framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103543 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1103898 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103898 [Bug 1103898] Package Bodhi 2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103897] Review Request: python-rxjson - JSON RX Schema validation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103897 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1103898 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103898 [Bug 1103898] Package Bodhi 2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1082656] Review Request: python-diff-cover - Automatically find diff lines that need test coverage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082656 --- Comment #2 from David Shea ds...@redhat.com --- Updated to latest upstream version. Spec URL: http://dshea.fedorapeople.org/python-diff-cover/v1/python-diff-cover.spec SRPM URL: http://dshea.fedorapeople.org/python-diff-cover/v1/python-diff-cover-0.4.1-1.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102858] Review Request: python-repoze-sphinx-autointerface - Auto-generate Sphinx API docs from Zope interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102858 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com --- Thank you very much for the review, Björn. (In reply to Björn besser82 Esser from comment #1) --- It might be nice to ask upstream for adding copyright / license headers atop the source-files I will make the attempt. = Additional Information = * Please conditionalize the build of the py3-pkg, so this can be easily ported to other releases (EPEL7), which don't offer support for py3, yet. Done. * The %%clean-section is unneccessary and will override the default %%clean in rpm-macros. Please drop it. This is not true. With the %clean section as is, rpmbuild --clean removes both repoze.sphinx.autointerface-0.7.1 and python3-python-repoze-sphinx-autointerface-0.7.1-1.fc21 from BUILD. If I remove the %clean section, then rpmbuild --clean removes the former but leaves the latter behind. * For a quick fix-up, I attached you a patch. Thank you, I appreciate the patch. I have modified your suggested patch a little due to differences in taste. New URLs: Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-repoze-sphinx-autointerface/python-repoze-sphinx-autointerface.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-repoze-sphinx-autointerface/python-repoze-sphinx-autointerface-0.7.1-2.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103917] New: Review Request: python-cornice - Define Web Services in Pyramid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103917 Bug ID: 1103917 Summary: Review Request: python-cornice - Define Web Services in Pyramid Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: boche...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-cornice.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-cornice-0.16.2-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Define Web Services in Pyramid Fedora Account System Username: bochecha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103917] Review Request: python-cornice - Define Web Services in Pyramid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103917 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1103898 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103898 [Bug 1103898] Package Bodhi 2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103897] Review Request: python-rxjson - JSON RX Schema validation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103897 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1103898 |1103917 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103898 [Bug 1103898] Package Bodhi 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103917 [Bug 1103917] Review Request: python-cornice - Define Web Services in Pyramid -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103917] Review Request: python-cornice - Define Web Services in Pyramid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103917 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1103897 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103897 [Bug 1103897] Review Request: python-rxjson - JSON RX Schema validation tool -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103897] Review Request: python-rxjson - JSON RX Schema validation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103897 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||karlthe...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|karlthe...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103917] Review Request: python-cornice - Define Web Services in Pyramid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103917 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||karlthe...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|karlthe...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102858] Review Request: python-repoze-sphinx-autointerface - Auto-generate Sphinx API docs from Zope interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102858 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- the %clean section Not the full story. The default %clean section removes the BUILDROOT. It doesn't remove the BUILD directory. rpmbuild --clean removes the BUILD dir in addition to %clean. If you override %clean the way you do so far, you don't remove the %buildroot. But if you added rm -rf %buildroot, that would result in different behaviour compared with what %clean does by default. I've filed https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/435 about this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103897] Review Request: python-rxjson - JSON RX Schema validation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103897
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com ---
I hereby approve of this package into Fedora Packages Collection.
Formal review here:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 4 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/haikel/1103897-python-rxjson/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
python3-rxjson
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests
[Bug 1101043] Review Request: ming - A library for generating Macromedia Flash files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101043 --- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net --- Thanks for the thorough review, Ralf. Here's an updated package. Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/ming/ming.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/ming/ming-0.4.5-2.fc20.src.rpm * Tue May 27 2014 Dominik Mierzejewski r...@greysector.net - 0.4.5-2 - fix ming-config to be multilib-compatible - enable testsuite - disable silent rules in configure call - drop defattr - build perl, php, python and tcl bindings - don't change ChangeLog timestamp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103927] New: Review Request: imaptest - A generic IMAP server compliancy tester
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103927 Bug ID: 1103927 Summary: Review Request: imaptest - A generic IMAP server compliancy tester Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/imaptest.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/imaptest-20140528-1.src.rpm Description: ImapTest is a generic IMAP server compliancy tester that works with all IMAP servers. It supports stress testing with state tracking, scripted testing and benchmarking. When stress testing with state tracking ImapTest sends random commands to the server and verifies that server's output looks correct. Using the scripted testing ImapTest runs a list of predefined scripted tests and verifies that server returns expected output. Examples and details are provided online at: http://www.imapwiki.org/ImapTest -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825 --- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net --- Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mozilla-lightbeam/mozilla-lightbeam.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mozilla-lightbeam/mozilla-lightbeam-1.0.10.1-1.fc20.src.rpm * Mon Jun 02 2014 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski r...@greysector.net - 1.0.10.1-1 - updated to 1.0.10.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087956] Review Request: ghc-wl-pprint - The Wadler/Leijen Pretty Printer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087956 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-wl-pprint-1.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070510] Review Request: getdns - Modern asynchronous API to the DNS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070510 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||getdns-0.1.1-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-06-02 18:56:58 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- getdns-0.1.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103034] Review Request: python-django-stopforumspam - Django middleware for blocking IPs listed in stopforumspam.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103034 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-django-stopforumspam-1.4.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086444] Review Request: ghc-optparse-applicative - Utilities and combinators for parsing command line options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086444 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-optparse-applicative-0. |ghc-optparse-applicative-0. |8.0.1-2.fc20|8.0.1-2.fc19 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-optparse-applicative-0.8.0.1-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103897] Review Request: python-rxjson - JSON RX Schema validation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103897 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org --- Thanks Haikel! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-rxjson Short Description: JSON RX Schema validation tool Upstream URL: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/rxjson/ Owners: bochecha lmacken Branches: devel el6 el7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1064352] Review Request: rubygem-deep_merge - Merges deep hashes in ruby.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064352
--- Comment #7 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package must contain a full copy of the MIT license. The good news is that
upstream has a LICENSE file in Git. The bad news is that they are not
shipping the file in the gem from rubygems.org. I've filed an issue for this
at https://github.com/danielsdeleo/deep_merge/pull/14, and in the mean time,
you can add a SOURCE1 pointing to
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/danielsdeleo/deep_merge/master/LICENSE
and ship the file in the main rubygem-deep_merge package.
- This is a minor thing that doesn't block approval: the URL field can be
updated to use HTTPS for github.com. (Reported upstream at
https://github.com/danielsdeleo/deep_merge/pull/15).
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
See issue listed above.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Ruby:
[x]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform
independent under %{gem_dir}.
[x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage
[x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated.
[x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name}
[x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel.
[x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro.
[x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch
[x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi).
[x]: Package contains Requires: ruby(release).
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include
[Bug 1091659] Review Request: iwyu - #include analysis tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091659 --- Comment #5 from Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com --- I added running of the tests to the check section and fixed the description because the 3rd line was incorrectly being viewed as a comment (is there a way to escape the # other than putting it later on the line like I did?). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060989] Review Request: ghc-io-streams - Simple, composable, easy-to-use stream I/O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060989 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-io-streams-1.1.4.5-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-io-streams-1.1.4.5-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060989] Review Request: ghc-io-streams - Simple, composable, easy-to-use stream I/O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060989 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-io-streams-1.1.4.5-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-io-streams-1.1.4.5-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060989] Review Request: ghc-io-streams - Simple, composable, easy-to-use stream I/O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060989 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076463] Review Request: playitagainsam - Record and replay interactive terminal sessions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076463 Praveen Kumar prku...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||prku...@redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Praveen Kumar prku...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Clint Savage from comment #9) I've updated the spec and srpm with these changes. Can you provide latest spec and srpm location if you replaced older one please mention same and paste url's. Thanks, herlo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1045963] Review Request: ghc-gtk3 - Binding to the Gtk+ graphical user interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045963 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Latest release is now 0.12.5.7 but releases 0.12.5.2 need newer glib, pango, cairo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
