[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846



--- Comment #14 from mreyno...@redhat.com ---

> Command for testing considers downloading of 'python-krbV' that is already
> provided in Fedora. 'setup.py' must use that one in Fedora. 

I will remove the requirement for python-krbV

> 
> + /usr/bin/python2 setup.py test
> running test
> Searching for python-krbV
> Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/python-krbV/
> Best match: python-krbV 1.0.90
> Downloading
> https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/python-krbV/python-krbV-1.0.90.tar.
> bz2#md5=77758e1bed2387636ca1989f1d122693
> Processing python-krbV-1.0.90.tar.bz2
> Writing /tmp/easy_install-2QLVGE/python-krbV-1.0.90/setup.cfg
> Running python-krbV-1.0.90/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir
> /tmp/easy_install-2QLVGE/python-krbV-1.0.90/egg-dist-tmp-6Ueu61
> krb5module.c: In function 'Context_cc_default':
> ...
> 
> Also, tests are not run:
> 
> > Ran 0 tests in 0.000s

I'm not sure what this is.  I do not see this in my rpmbuild or mock output.  I
know that the %check section is being performed.  Is there something else?

> 
> - Sources used to build the package does not match the upstream source, as
> provided in the spec URL.
> 
> Source checksums
> 
> http://port389.org/binaries/lib389-1.0.1-1.tar.bz2 :
>   CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
> 96c0648135fd795e3de286d2095af01ac6462556cc1f6dc5ded29b782155b0cf
>   CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
> a9e65e0c788e7b2c8f0331c51f9fdc7df0b3459c70c80bde99750d14cbff0403

I noticed this before when running rpmlint - but the sources were the same.  I
wonder if its an issue with port389.org?  I will investigate...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256393] Review Request: kf5-syndication - The Syndication Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256393

Jan Grulich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-12-04 09:46:14



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256391] Review Request: kf5-kpimtextedit - The KPimTextEdit Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256391

Jan Grulich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-12-04 09:45:20



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256338] Review Request: kf5-akonadi - The Akonadi client libraries

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256338

Jan Grulich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-12-04 09:46:44



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256389] Review Request: kf5-kontactinterface - The KontactInterface Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256389

Jan Grulich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-12-04 09:45:09



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287756] Review Request: copy-jdk-configs - JDK config files copier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287756



--- Comment #11 from jiri vanek  ---
TYVM!

(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #10)
> - you should use %license macro for license instead of %doc. Also, it would
> be better if you didn't install the license manually and let rpmbuild handle
> it (copying it into build dir in %prep and then having just `%license
> LICENSE` in %files).

Thanx for this hint. I utterly forgot it exists. Fixed.

> Just FYI, you should have replaced  with
> "Red Hat" in the license.

fixed in upstrea and new tag added.

> - is there any specific reason to have it installed in /usr/share? If it's
> supposed to be executed by the user, it should go to /usr/bin, otherwise to
> /usr/libexec.

My reason was that /usr/share was the only place where I found soem other lua
scripts.
On contrary, libexec is full of perl or so I moved it there.

It is not expected to be launched by user.. hopefully...
I'm half inclined to put it more public and in /usr/bin (with man page and
so...) But not now. Maybe later. (once people startto ask why openjdk update
requires lua...)

> - you should try to preserve timestamps of the files by using -p argument of
> cp

fixed (via -a)

> - is there some documentation for it? it would be nice if it had a manpage

Not yet:( If it will ever go to path, then I will surely create man page.
Right now -h/--help is working!
And for testing.. feel free to get inspired by:
/usr/libexec/copy_jdk_configs.lua--currentjvm
"java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.66-3.b17.fc22.x86_64" --jvmdir "/usr/lib/jvm"
--origname "java-1.8.0-openjdk" --origjavaver "1.8.0" --arch "x86_64" --debug
true  --jvmDestdir /tmp

> 
> Package Review
> ==
...
> [?]: Package functions as described.

Example usage(s) posted.

> [x]: Latest version is packaged.
> [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
> [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
>  translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
> [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
>  architectures.
> [-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
> [!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
>  files.

Should be fixed

> [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
> [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
...
> 
> 
> Source checksums
> 
> https://hg.fedorahosted.org/hg/copy_jdk_configs/raw-file/copy_jdk_configs-1.
> 0/copy_jdk_configs.lua :
>   CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
> 4ce4d594897b9f099c03302943042cc46460198b858064439ce7d33be97e0b24
>   CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
> 4ce4d594897b9f099c03302943042cc46460198b858064439ce7d33be97e0b24
> https://hg.fedorahosted.org/hg/copy_jdk_configs/raw-file/copy_jdk_configs-1.
> 0/LICENSE :
>   CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
> 44925e9dc7359ec6e978e6e7b4662785415825854f2c828f1a17694684340ecb
>   CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
> 44925e9dc7359ec6e978e6e7b4662785415825854f2c828f1a17694684340ecb


Sources changes. I will post URLs in next comment.

TY!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287435] Review Request: vagrant-hostmanager - Vagrant plugin to manage /etc/hosts

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287435



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/vagrant-hostmanager

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287756] Review Request: copy-jdk-configs - JDK config files copier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287756

Michael Simacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #13 from Michael Simacek  ---
Looks ok to me now, APPROVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288246] Review Request: nodejs-buffer-writer - Read binary packets...

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288246



--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-buffer-writer

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 820660] Review Request: FEniCS - tracker bug

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820660

Jonathan Underwood  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(jonathan.underwoo |
   |d...@gmail.com)|



--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Underwood  ---
Well, the various blocking bugs have been closed as noone continued to work on
the packaging work. So, it's find to close this as DEADREVIEW or somesuch as
far as I am concerned.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287794] Review Request: archaius - Library for configuration management API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287794



--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/archaius

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287837] Review Request: python-borgbackup - A deduplicating backup program

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287837



--- Comment #5 from Benjamin Pereto  ---
Spec URL: https://data.sandchaschte.ch/pub/fedora/python3-borgbackup.spec
SRPM URL:
https://data.sandchaschte.ch/pub/fedora/python3-borgbackup-0.28.2-5.fc23.src.rpm

Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12052822


> - SPEC file name does not match package's name
Sure, now its a python3 only rpm

> - Remove pre-built egg-info files
is beeing removed in %pre stage

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288100] Review Request: ConsoleImageViewer - Terminal image viewer

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288100

Omair Majid  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287775] Review Request: perl-SVN-Look - Caching wrapper around the svnlook command

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287775

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1288541




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288541
[Bug 1288541] Review Request: perl-Code-TidyAll - Engine for tidyall, your
all-in-one code tidier and validator
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288541] Review Request: perl-Code-TidyAll - Engine for tidyall, your all-in-one code tidier and validator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288541

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1287121, 1287775, 1288065




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287121
[Bug 1287121] Review Request: perl-Mason-Tidy - Tidy HTML::Mason/Mason
components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287775
[Bug 1287775] Review Request: perl-SVN-Look - Caching wrapper around the
svnlook command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288065
[Bug 1288065] Review Request: perl-Pod-Tidy - Reformatting Pod Processor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288065] Review Request: perl-Pod-Tidy - Reformatting Pod Processor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288065

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1288541




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288541
[Bug 1288541] Review Request: perl-Code-TidyAll - Engine for tidyall, your
all-in-one code tidier and validator
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846



--- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt  ---
Created attachment 1102297
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1102297=edit
simplify topdir usage in spec file

> %setup -qc
> mv %{name}-%{version}-1 src_root

> %build
> pushd src_root

> %license src_root/LICENSE
> %doc src_root/README

This is overly complicated. What's the reason for doing it like this and moving
the source topdir to a custom src_root?

Note that rpmbuild enters the topdir _automatically_ for every spec section,
provided that it knows what the dir's name is.

What's the reason for appending -1 to the upstream version anyway? It can be
made to work with rpmbuild, see the attached patch, but as this dubious -1 will
never match the package %release, it isn't helpful.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846



--- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt  ---
Btw, all Python modules in Fedora's package collection are named python-foo,
following the %parent-%child naming guidelines for Python add-ons:

  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines

There used to be an exception for Python modules that contain "py" in the name
somewhere, but that exception has been dropped a few years ago.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256347] Review Request: kf5-akonadi-search - The Akonadi Search library and indexing agent

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256347

Jan Grulich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-12-04 09:47:05



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256341] Review Request: kf5-akonadi-calendar - The Akonadi Calendar client library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256341

Jan Grulich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-12-04 09:46:51



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256359] Review Request: kf5-kalarmcal - The KAlarmCal Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256359

Jan Grulich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-12-04 09:47:13



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1281876] Review Request: enki - Extensible text editor for programmers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281876



--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/enki

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287756] Review Request: copy-jdk-configs - JDK config files copier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287756



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
copy-jdk-configs-1.1-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dba945af4a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287756] Review Request: copy-jdk-configs - JDK config files copier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287756

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287756] Review Request: copy-jdk-configs - JDK config files copier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287756



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
copy-jdk-configs-1.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-c13fd741f6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287756] Review Request: copy-jdk-configs - JDK config files copier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287756



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
copy-jdk-configs-1.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2f6c7508b7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1276625] Review Request: geronimo-jcache - Apache Geronimo JCache Spec 1.0

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276625



--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/geronimo-jcache

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287121] Review Request: perl-Mason-Tidy - Tidy HTML::Mason/Mason components

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287121

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1288541




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288541
[Bug 1288541] Review Request: perl-Code-TidyAll - Engine for tidyall, your
all-in-one code tidier and validator
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256386] Review Request: kf5-kmbox - The KMbox library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256386

Jan Grulich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-12-04 09:45:02



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256380] Review Request: kf5-kldap - The KLDAP Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256380

Jan Grulich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-12-04 09:44:46



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287756] Review Request: copy-jdk-configs - JDK config files copier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287756



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
copy-jdk-configs-1.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update copy-jdk-configs'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2f6c7508b7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287193] Review Request: letsencrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193



--- Comment #18 from James Hogarth  ---
Spec URL: https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/letsencrypt/letsencrypt-0.1.0-2.fc23.src.rpm


As discussed no python3 as it's not supported by upstream and fails to build.
This will be added once upstream supports it (it is on there roadmap post GA).

A docs subpackage has been added (recommended by python2-letsencrypt) as well
with the API docs and the man pages added (even though they are just --help
output) to the packages.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277397] Review Request: php-nette-di - Nette Dependency Injection Component

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277397



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-di-2.3.7-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-nette-di'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-762f8c75bb

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277474] Review Request: php-nette-database - Nette Database Component

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277474



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-database-2.3.8-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-nette-database'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-03167b8e07

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287837] Review Request: python-borgbackup - A deduplicating backup program

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287837



--- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande  ---
- >rm -rf %{buildroot}/%{srcname}.egg-info

This command does not work in %prep, %{buildroot} does not exist yet.
Use

rm -rf %{srcname}.egg-info

-  >%attr(0755, root, root) %{python3_sitearch}/borg/*.so 

Why ?

- >%{__python3} setup.py check

No tests seem performed; please check.

- >%files -n python3-%{srcname}

Specify package name is useless.

- >%{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{srcname}}

'python_provide' macro is not necessary in this case.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: python-lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846



--- Comment #18 from Antonio Trande  ---
(In reply to mreynolds from comment #14)
> > Command for testing considers downloading of 'python-krbV' that is already
> > provided in Fedora. 'setup.py' must use that one in Fedora. 
> 
> I will remove the requirement for python-krbV
> 
> > 
> > + /usr/bin/python2 setup.py test
> > running test
> > Searching for python-krbV
> > Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/python-krbV/
> > Best match: python-krbV 1.0.90
> > Downloading
> > https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/python-krbV/python-krbV-1.0.90.tar.
> > bz2#md5=77758e1bed2387636ca1989f1d122693
> > Processing python-krbV-1.0.90.tar.bz2
> > Writing /tmp/easy_install-2QLVGE/python-krbV-1.0.90/setup.cfg
> > Running python-krbV-1.0.90/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir
> > /tmp/easy_install-2QLVGE/python-krbV-1.0.90/egg-dist-tmp-6Ueu61
> > krb5module.c: In function 'Context_cc_default':
> > ...
> > 
> > Also, tests are not run:
> > 
> > > Ran 0 tests in 0.000s
> 
> I'm not sure what this is.  I do not see this in my rpmbuild or mock output.
> I know that the %check section is being performed.  Is there something else?
> 

See build log here:
http://fpaste.org/297491/

At line #283 --> usr/bin/python2 setup.py test
#288, python-krbV is downloaded
#354, pytest is downloaded
#364, py is downloaded
#381, Ran 0 tests in 0.000s

No tests performed and 3 package downloded but already provided for building.

> > 
> > - Sources used to build the package does not match the upstream source, as
> > provided in the spec URL.
> > 
> > Source checksums
> > 
> > http://port389.org/binaries/lib389-1.0.1-1.tar.bz2 :
> >   CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
> > 96c0648135fd795e3de286d2095af01ac6462556cc1f6dc5ded29b782155b0cf
> >   CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
> > a9e65e0c788e7b2c8f0331c51f9fdc7df0b3459c70c80bde99750d14cbff0403
> 
> I noticed this before when running rpmlint - but the sources were the same. 
> I wonder if its an issue with port389.org?  I will investigate...

How did you created your src-rpm?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638



--- Comment #5 from Richard Shaw  ---
Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv.spec
SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv-1.1-2.fc21.src.rpm

* Fri Dec  4 2015 Richard Shaw  - 1.1-2
- Move to bundled sox to work around now private function in sox 14.4.2.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638



--- Comment #6 from Richard Shaw  ---
Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv.spec
SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv-1.1-2.fc22.src.rpm

Fixed dist tag in the link since I've upgraded Fedora releases since this was
posted.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1093500] Review Request: clasp - A conflict-driven nogood learning answer set solver

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500

James Hogarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||james.hoga...@gmail.com
  Flags||needinfo?(i...@cicku.me)



--- Comment #7 from James Hogarth  ---
Christopher are you interested in progressing the review of this package?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288610] New: Review Request: python-lazy-object-proxy - A fast and thorough lazy object proxy

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288610

Bug ID: 1288610
   Summary: Review Request: python-lazy-object-proxy - A fast and
thorough lazy object proxy
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: b...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://bcl.fedorapeople.org/python-lazy-object-proxy/python-lazy-object-proxy.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bcl.fedorapeople.org/python-lazy-object-proxy/python-lazy-object-proxy-1.2.1-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: A fast and thorough lazy object proxy
Fedora Account System Username: bcl

This new package is a requirement for the update to pylint-1.5.1 and
python-astroid-1.4.3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277434] Review Request: php-nette-mail - Nette Mail: Sending E-mails

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277434
Bug 1277434 depends on bug 1277397, which changed state.

Bug 1277397 Summary: Review Request: php-nette-di  - Nette Dependency Injection 
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277397

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277413] Review Request: php-nette-reflection - Nette PHP Reflection Component

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277413
Bug 1277413 depends on bug 1277397, which changed state.

Bug 1277397 Summary: Review Request: php-nette-di  - Nette Dependency Injection 
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277397

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277415] Review Request: php-nette-http - Nette HTTP Component

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277415
Bug 1277415 depends on bug 1277397, which changed state.

Bug 1277397 Summary: Review Request: php-nette-di  - Nette Dependency Injection 
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277397

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277397] Review Request: php-nette-di - Nette Dependency Injection Component

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277397

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-di-2.3.7-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-nette-di'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-d5b4979626

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277409] Review Request: php-nette-caching - Nette Caching Component

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277409
Bug 1277409 depends on bug 1277397, which changed state.

Bug 1277397 Summary: Review Request: php-nette-di  - Nette Dependency Injection 
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277397

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288007] Review Request: perl-Pod-Wrap - Wrap pod paragraphs, leaving verbatim text and code alone

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288007



--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Pod-Wrap

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288100] Review Request: console-image-viewer - Terminal image viewer

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288100



--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/console-image-viewer

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 532554] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-moh-opsound - Music on hold sound files for Asterisk

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532554

Jeffrey C. Ollie  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
  Flags|needinfo?(j...@ocjtech.us)  |
Last Closed||2015-12-04 11:15:09



--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey C. Ollie  ---
I'm no longer interested in packaging this...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: python-lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846

Antonio Trande  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: lib389 -|Review Request:
   |python module to access the |python-lib389 - python
   |389 DIrectory Server|module to access the 389
   ||DIrectory Server



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277418] Review Request: php-nette-security - Nette Security: Access Control Component

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277418
Bug 1277418 depends on bug 1277397, which changed state.

Bug 1277397 Summary: Review Request: php-nette-di  - Nette Dependency Injection 
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277397

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277493] Review Request: php-kdyby-events - Events for Nette Framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277493
Bug 1277493 depends on bug 1277397, which changed state.

Bug 1277397 Summary: Review Request: php-nette-di  - Nette Dependency Injection 
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277397

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277474] Review Request: php-nette-database - Nette Database Component

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277474

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-database-2.3.8-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-nette-database'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-665336d022

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277476] Review Request: php-nette-bootstrap - Nette Bootstrap

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277476
Bug 1277476 depends on bug 1277397, which changed state.

Bug 1277397 Summary: Review Request: php-nette-di  - Nette Dependency Injection 
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277397

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277470] Review Request: php-nette-application - Nette Application MVC Component

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277470
Bug 1277470 depends on bug 1277397, which changed state.

Bug 1277397 Summary: Review Request: php-nette-di  - Nette Dependency Injection 
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277397

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277504] Review Request: apigen - PHP source code API generator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277504
Bug 1277504 depends on bug 1277397, which changed state.

Bug 1277397 Summary: Review Request: php-nette-di  - Nette Dependency Injection 
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277397

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277400] Review Request: php-tracy - Tracy: useful PHP debugger

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277400
Bug 1277400 depends on bug 1277397, which changed state.

Bug 1277397 Summary: Review Request: php-nette-di  - Nette Dependency Injection 
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277397

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277474] Review Request: php-nette-database - Nette Database Component

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277474
Bug 1277474 depends on bug 1277397, which changed state.

Bug 1277397 Summary: Review Request: php-nette-di  - Nette Dependency Injection 
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277397

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277484] Review Request: php-nette - Nette Framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277484
Bug 1277484 depends on bug 1277397, which changed state.

Bug 1277397 Summary: Review Request: php-nette-di  - Nette Dependency Injection 
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277397

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277465] Review Request: php-nette-forms - Nette Forms: greatly facilitates web forms

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277465
Bug 1277465 depends on bug 1277397, which changed state.

Bug 1277397 Summary: Review Request: php-nette-di  - Nette Dependency Injection 
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277397

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287183] Review Request: mathicgb - Groebner basis computations

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287183

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
mathicgb-1.0-2.20131006.gitc72c945.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update mathicgb'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-c461ef7cfe

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287756] Review Request: copy-jdk-configs - JDK config files copier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287756

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
copy-jdk-configs-1.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update copy-jdk-configs'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-c13fd741f6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287775] Review Request: perl-SVN-Look - Caching wrapper around the svnlook command

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287775



--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-SVN-Look

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638



--- Comment #4 from Richard Shaw  ---
Darn, I forgot about that. With the sox 14.4.2 release they made a bunch of
previously public functions private. The only workaround for now is bundling
sox which I don't want to do but it's currently acceptable. I'll update the
package and add the Provides for bundled sox.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1159703] Review Request: Java persistence API implementation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159703

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it



--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo  ---
Package already available:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/geronimo-jpa.git/
Please, close this bug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1144865] Review Request: glite-lb-doc - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping documentation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144865



--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
pbrobinson's scratch build of
glite-px-proxyrenewal?#4338269af302c9682fd1b8dd2852e8f05589b8e7 for
epel7-archbootstrap and
git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/glite-px-proxyrenewal?#4338269af302c9682fd1b8dd2852e8f05589b8e7
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12056238

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1162000] Review Request:jonathan-core - Distributed Object Platform (DOP) written entirely in Java

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162000

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it



--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo  ---
The spec file should be cleanup.
Please, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302#c1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1279786] Review Request: python-dbf - Pure python package for reading/writing dBase, FoxPro, and Visual FoxPro .dbf

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279786



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-dbf-0.96.005-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-ba1f02a453

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288643] New: Review Request: dlib

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643

Bug ID: 1288643
   Summary: Review Request: dlib
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: mikhi...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/bizdelnick/neuro/dlib.git/plain/dlib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/bizdelnick/neuro/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00144844-dlib/dlib-18.18-1.fc24.src.rpm

Description:

Dlib is a modern C++ toolkit containing machine learning algorithms and tools
for creating complex software in C++ to solve real world problems. It is open
source software and licensed under the Boost Software License.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1282063] Review Request: xxhsum - Extremely fast hash algorithm

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it



--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo  ---
HI
could you build libxxhash? is a BuildRequires for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317

can you add this part in your spec file?

# Use ${LIB_INSTALL_DIR} instead of hardcoded lib in cmake file
sed -i 's|DESTINATION lib|DESTINATION ${LIB_INSTALL_DIR}|'
cmake_unofficial/CMakeLists.txt

%build

CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-%optflags}"
#CPPFLAGS="CPPFLAGS"
export CFLAGS
(
 cd cmake_unofficial
 %{__cmake} -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=%{_prefix}
-DLIB_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=%{_libdir}
)



%install
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} -C cmake_unofficial
find %{buildroot} -name '*.a' -delete
find %{buildroot} -name '*.la' -delete

Thanks in advance

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1282063] Review Request: xxhsum - Extremely fast hash algorithm

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1270317




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317
[Bug 1270317] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1269844] Review Request: jcuber - CUBE reader for Java

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269844

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1286002] Package Review: jfontchooser - Swing-based java component for font selection

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286002

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1269813] Review Request: golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go - Golang implementation of JSON Web Tokens (JWT)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269813



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go-2.2.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288651] Review Request: OpenIGTLink

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288651

Dmitry Mikhirev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)



--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Mikhirev  ---
I'm sorry, forgot to paste URLs:

Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/bizdelnick/neuro/OpenIGTLink.git/plain/OpenIGTLink.spec?id=dcd4b2f058890e46f74a31d47661e4ddeecb97b3
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/bizdelnick/neuro/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00143768-OpenIGTLink/OpenIGTLink-0-0.1.20151015gitccb2438.fc24.src.rpm


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1273877] Review Request: nodejs-path-is-absolute - Node.js 0.12 path.isAbsolute() ponyfill

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273877



--- Comment #4 from Jared Smith  ---
Sorry for the delay -- I've been traveling this week and haven't been as
attentive to packages as I usually am.  I've pushed this to the master branch
and am building for rawhide now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1284255] Review Request: wayland-protocols - Wayland protocols that adds functionality not available in the Wayland core protocol

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284255



--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember  ---
Fedora review wayland-protocols-1.0-1.fc24.src.rpm 2015-12-04

$ rpmlint wayland-protocols-1.0-1.fc24.src.rpm \
  wayland-protocols-devel
wayland-protocols.src: E: summary-too-long C Wayland protocols that adds
functionality not available in the Wayland core protocol
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.

+ OK
! needs attention

! rpmlint warnings:

  Would be good to fix up the summary-tool-long warning. I'd suggest "Wayland
protocol files" as the new summary.

+ The package is named according to Fedora packaging guidelines
+ The spec file name matches the base package name.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
  Licensing Guidelines.
+ The license field in the spec file matches the actual license
+ The license text (COPYING) is included in %license
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match the sources in the srpm
  1ee04fc828cffaf278fdc684a13981eb  wayland-protocols-1.0.tar.xz
  1ee04fc828cffaf278fdc684a13981eb  Download/wayland-protocols-1.0.tar.xz
+ The package builds in koji
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires look sane

  We don't usually specify 'make' explicitly, but it's fine to have it too if
you want to list that.

n/a locale handling
n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
n/a Package isn't relocatable
+ Package owns all the directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ Permissions are properly set
+ Consistent use of macros
+ The package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect the runtime of application
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
+ Development files should be in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ Packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a Proper .desktop file handling
+ Doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages
+ Filenames are valid UTF-8


Some other nitpicks I noticed:

> Requires:   pkgconfig

rpmbuild autogenerates a dep on /usr/bin/pkg-config and there's no need to
manually list "Requires: pkgconfig"

> %make_build

Like Jonas says above, this isn't really needed for this package as it's not
building anything.


Another thing I noticed is that now that you are only building a
wayland-protocols-devel and there's no wayland-protocols package, all the
nicely written summaries are essentially not used in the actual user visible
package -- the -devel subpackage only has a copy-pasted one line blurb. It's
also somewhat misleading to say "Development files for %{name}" because there's
no '%{name}' package.


None of these are blocking issues for the review, but please feel free to
address them before importing.

APPROVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1284255] Review Request: wayland-protocols - Wayland protocols that adds functionality not available in the Wayland core protocol

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284255

Kalev Lember  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288231] Review Request: nodejs-postgres-array - Parse postgres array columns

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288231

John Dulaney  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard||NEEDSWORK



--- Comment #1 from John Dulaney  ---
mock failed with:

DEBUG util.py:399:  No matching package to install: 'npm(ap)'
DEBUG util.py:399:  Not all dependencies satisfied
DEBUG util.py:399:  Error: Some packages could not be found.
DEBUG util.py:521:  Child return code was: 1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1279786] Review Request: python-dbf - Pure python package for reading/writing dBase, FoxPro, and Visual FoxPro .dbf

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279786

Julien Enselme  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #2 from Julien Enselme  ---
Thanks for the review. I'll correct the line ending of the README and contact
upstream for the license before importing the package into pkgdb.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288231] Review Request: nodejs-postgres-array - Parse postgres array columns

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288231



--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes  ---
The nodejs-ap package was only reviewed this morning, so it's it rawhide but
won't have reach most of the mirrors yet.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1159226] Review Request: JavaBeans Activation Framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159226

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it



--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo  ---
The JAF apis are part of JRE (since JAVA >= 1.6). Please, close this bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288231] Review Request: nodejs-postgres-array - Parse postgres array columns

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288231



--- Comment #3 from John Dulaney  ---
Okay, I'll rerun tomorrow, unless you have a pressing need for it to be done
today.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1279786] Review Request: python-dbf - Pure python package for reading/writing dBase, FoxPro, and Visual FoxPro .dbf

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279786



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-dbf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1157302] Review Request: oldkilim - A generic configuration framework for Java

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it



--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo  ---
The spec file should be cleanup, please remove:

Group:Development/Libraries/Java
#Vendor:JPackage Project
#Distribution:JPackage

BuildRoot:  %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-buildroot

Group: Development/Documentation

rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install section

%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

%post javadoc

%postun javadoc

%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)

* jar and javadoc must be without version, e.g.

# jars
install -d -m 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}
install -pm 644 distrib/kilim.jar $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}.jar
install -pm 644 distrib/kilim-tools.jar
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-tools.jar

# javadoc
install -p -d -m 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadocdir}/%{name}
cp -pr doc/apis/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadocdir}/%{name}

%files javadoc
%{_javadocdir}/%{name}

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1159217] Review Request: J2EE(tm) Connector Architecture

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159217

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it



--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo  ---
Please, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Pre-built_dependencies
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1159223] Review Request: ow2-jta-1.1-spec - "ow2-jta-1.1-spec" spec file

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159223

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it



--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo  ---
The spec file should be cleanup.
Please, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302#c1
and BuildRequires: java-1.7.0-openjdk no more exist in Fedora

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1144865] Review Request: glite-lb-doc - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping documentation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144865



--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
pbrobinson's scratch build of
glite-lb-logger?#5d888cd26b591dd49ddcd86339543ad5a7682c98 for
epel7-archbootstrap and
git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/glite-lb-logger?#5d888cd26b591dd49ddcd86339543ad5a7682c98
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12056221

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288643] Review Request: dlib

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643

Dmitry Mikhirev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288645] New: Review Request: teem

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288645

Bug ID: 1288645
   Summary: Review Request: teem
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: mikhi...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/bizdelnick/neuro/teem.git/plain/teem.spec?id=c4062dcf9a54cb7f3d50e3a5c5aaf047dc2557fe
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/bizdelnick/neuro/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00143767-teem/teem-1.11.0-1.fc24.src.rpm

Description:

Teem is a coordinated group of libraries for representing, processing, and
visualizing scientific raster data. Teem includes command-line tools that
permit the library functions to be quickly applied to files and streams,
without having to write any code. The most important and useful libraries in
Teem are:

- Nrrd (and the unu command-line tool on top of it) supports a range of
operations for transforming N-dimensional raster data (resample, crop, slice,
project, histogram, etc.), as well as the NRRD file format for storing arrays
and their meta-information.
- Gage: fast convolution-based measurements at arbitrary point locations in
volume datasets (scalar, vector, tensor, etc.)
- Mite: a multi-threaded ray-casting volume render with transfer functions
based on any quantity Gage can measure
- Ten: for estimating, processing, and visualizing diffusion tensor fields,
including fiber tractography methods.

This library is required to build 3D-Slicer that I'm going to package.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288651] New: Review Request: OpenIGTLink

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288651

Bug ID: 1288651
   Summary: Review Request: OpenIGTLink
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: mikhi...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
SRPM URL:

Description:

The OpenIGTLink Library is a reference implementation of OpenIGTLink protocol.
It is required to build 3D-Slicer that I'm going to package.

OpenIGTLink is a network communication protocol specifically designed and
developed for research on image-guided and computer-assisted interventions. It
provides a standardized mechanism for communications among computers and
devices in operating rooms (OR) for a wide variety of image-guided therapy
(IGT) applications. Examples of such applications include:

- Stereotactic surgical guidance using optical position sensor and medical
image visualization software
- Intraoperative image guidance using real-time MRI and medical image
visualization software
- Robot-assisted interventions using robotic devices and surgical planning
software

OpenIGTLink is a set of messaging formats and rules (protocol) used for data
exchange on a local area network (LAN).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288649] New: Review Request: -

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288649

Bug ID: 1288649
   Summary: Review Request:  - 
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jdula...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://rpms.jdulaney.com/review/cmark.spec
SRPM URL: http://rpms.jdulaney.com/review/cmark-0.22.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: 
cmark is the C reference implementation of CommonMark,
a rationalized version of Markdown syntax with a spec.
(For the JavaScript reference implementation, see commonmark.js.)

It provides a shared library (libcmark) with functions for
parsing CommonMark documents to an abstract syntax tree
(AST), manipulating the AST, and rendering the document to
HTML, groff man, LaTeX, CommonMark, or an XML representation
of the AST. It also provides a command-line program (cmark) for
parsing and rendering CommonMark documents.
Fedora Account System Username:  jdulaney

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1270317] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1282063




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063
[Bug 1282063] Review Request: xxhsum - Extremely fast hash algorithm
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288649] Review Request: cmark - cmark is the C reference implementation of CommonMark

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288649

John Dulaney  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request:  -|implementation of
   ||CommonMark



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 769958] Review Request: eqp - Automated theorem prover for first-order equational logic

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769958

John C Peterson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(j...@eskimo.com)   |



--- Comment #10 from John C Peterson  ---
Hello James,

The short answer is no.

As I noted in my post dated 2012-11-01, I did get into contact with the
organization at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), where the (now deceased) EQP
author was employed when the original work was performed.

There wasn't any formal procedure at ANL for the licensing or distribution of
software when the code was first released. Consequently, the EQP software is
not even in their own database of ANL developed software. They pretty much just
gave me pointers to the "license" that is shown on the project home page (links
below). I can forward those emails from ANL to anyone who is interested. 

http://www.mcs.anl.gov/research/projects/AR/eqp/
http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mccune/eqp/

If that "license" is not adequate, then the matter should be considered closed.
My feeling is that it's highly unlikely ANL will be inclined to provide any
further clarification above and beyond that.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1284255] Review Request: wayland-protocols - Wayland protocols that adds functionality not available in the Wayland core protocol

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284255



--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
kalev's scratch build of wayland-protocols-1.0-1.fc24.src.rpm for f24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12058568

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1144865] Review Request: glite-lb-doc - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping documentation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144865



--- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
pbrobinson's scratch build of
glite-lb-server?#0b7eec393509758e03e4d2d437cb7f2a5f6136e6 for
epel7-archbootstrap and
git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/glite-lb-server?#0b7eec393509758e03e4d2d437cb7f2a5f6136e6
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12056226

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277505] Review Request: jssc - Java Simple Serial Connector

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277505



--- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo  ---
(In reply to Damian Wrobel from comment #13)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #10)
> > instead of maven-local you should use javapackages-local
> > 
> Gil, thanks for your hints, I started to look at them and compare with
> packaging guidelines [1] and I found that e.g. [1] clearly states the
> following:
> 
> "Java packages MUST BuildRequire their respective build system:
> 
> BuildRequires: maven-local for packages built with Maven"
> 
> and there is no single reference that javapackages-local can be used as a
> substitute for maven-local in this case.

Only if the package provide a pom.xml file and use that for build the package
in this case you use only java-devel. javapackages-local is enough

> So is there any specification on top of it which overwrites this or I
> misunderstood or missed something?
> 
> [1]. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires
see also
https://fedorahosted.org/released/javapackages/doc/#_generic_java_builds
regards

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1144865] Review Request: glite-lb-doc - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping documentation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144865



--- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
pbrobinson's scratch build of
glite-lb-utils?#a5f7629036a2c87266412d58a2365dd4d9236f30 for
epel7-archbootstrap and
git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/glite-lb-utils?#a5f7629036a2c87266412d58a2365dd4d9236f30
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12056233

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1162011] Review Request: qname - This is the javax.transaction's spec file

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162011

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it



--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo  ---
The spec file should be cleanup.
Please, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302#c1
and (how wrote Quan Xu) BuildRequires: java-1.7.0-openjdk no more exist in
Fedora

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 804125] Review Request: rdkit - A toolkit for cheminformatics and machine learning

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125



--- Comment #40 from Gianluca Sforna  ---
Updated package and spec, the tests are now fixed:

https://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2015.09.2-2.fc23.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review