PalmOS Developer Certification

2006-05-19 Thread Borszczuk

hi,

Anyone knows when (if ever) be the PalmOS Developer Certification event?
I recall someone here was asking about that some time ago. Any closer
information by any chance?

Regards,
-- 
Daddy, what Formatting drive C: means?...

 Marcin   http://wfmh.org.pl/carlos/

-- 
For information on using the PalmSource Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, 
please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification (modeless dialogs)

2003-02-25 Thread Tom Frauenhofer
I agree with this, but I discovered that 160*160 modal screens look ugly on 
the Alphasmart Dana (560*160 device, but it defaults most PalmOS apps to a 
160*160 area in the middle of the screen - you get a extra-thick border on 
the right and no border on the left, with a little bump to the bottom left 
corner, not a dot - looks really bad).

It's easier for me to clean up any/all screens than to get PalmSource to 
make 160*160 modal screens work the way I want them (or, of course, to take 
advantage of the full Dana screen - but that's more work...).

IMHO, as we get newer form factors from licensees, it's really to your 
advantage to pay attention to the UI guidelines, at the very least so that 
if you break them you will understand the consequences.

At 12:00 AM 2/24/2003 -0800, Stringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that the UI guidelines are incomplete on the subject of
modal screens, and that full screen 160*160 modal screens have
a valid place in UI design in Palm OS.

Tom Frauenhofer, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.beret.com 



--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-24 Thread Jason Freund

 Roger Stringer:
 Speaking for myself, I was always put off by the lack of sample exams
 and a primer.  The comment just read all the manuals and you'll pass
 was never motivating.


I took the sample a while ago, so I don't remember exactly, but I think
there wasn't much, if anything, from the Communications section (except
maybe IR), however there was a fair amount of conduit stuff.  Maybe if it
was their intention to exclude a few sections, they should mention it.

My biggest complaint, however, is that it's not clear how the tests are
scored.  I think there were about 30 questions on the sample, but many
required more than one correct answer.  How is the test scored, and what
score is needed to pass?  One time I was interested in taking it, but after
sending a couple emails I never got a response to that question.

Jason


-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-23 Thread Sean Charles
On Sunday, February 23, 2003, at 05:02 AM, Mark Wilden wrote:

From: Scott Gruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]

It is too bad that users tolerate this junk.
Maybe users just don't care as much about UI guidelines as some of us do?
 :)
I don't think they do to be honest. Most customers I have encountered are 
far more concerned with things like 'reliability' and 'integrity of data' 
over time. I have seen some real pigs in my time, I remember one system, a 
train describer, and I think the original UI designer was on a bad acid 
trip or something. Just about every different screen was differently 
coloured, used different fonts and just looked like somebody let loose 
eight pounds of semtex in a paint factorybutbecause it worked in a 
defined manner and worked reliably, day in day out, they were more than 
happy with it.

I don't think users even know what modal and modeless really mean. If you 
ask a Word user: 'Is that search dialog modal or modeless? they wouldn't 
have a clue. All they know is it just hangs there (in the way most of the 
time!) until the need it again or close it. That's all they care about and 
need to know.

The bottom line is I think, to quote Ripping Yarns, It's not the shorts 
lad, it's what' in 'em!. Okay, some level of consistency is required for 
a common LAF but I don't see what the beef is all about over a couple of 
pixels in the corners and I don't really think that you can infer the 
programmer is a dumb-ass from that. He might be a genius who's just too 
busy to worry about such things. Einstein had a wardrobe with seven 
identical suits so as he wouldn't have to waste mental effort deciding 
what to wear. How many people looked at him and thought He always wears 
the same clothes, how unimaginative he must be!

Sean Charles.

--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, 
please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/



--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-23 Thread Veronica Loell
Subject: Re: Developer Certification ?
From:Mark Wilden [EMAIL PROTECTED]

From: Scott Gruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 It is too bad that users tolerate this junk.

Maybe users just don't care as much about UI guidelines as some of us do? :)

-- 

Seriuosly have you seen any application with a good user interface be it
for palm sized computers or full sized? The fact that there are so many
really really bad user interfaces around and people accept it is in my mind
that most people have yet to understand that an application should be made
with the user in mind. The user should not have to be molded to fit the
application. The car analogy is often used in this setting. How would you
react when you bring your car back to the dealer because it backfires when
you hit turnsignal to the left and you are told that all you have to do
is make sure that you turn on the windshield wipers before you hit the
turnsignal. Of course, why didn't I think of that I must be really
stupid! That seems to be the standard customer reply in regards to
computer applications, however most people don't seem to think that it
applies to things like cars. Considering more and more administrative
things are done with the help of a computer theese days it is really
scary that it has yet to move out of the users thinks they are stupid
if they cant figure out how a computer program works phase. It is well
over due.

As far as guidlines go, they are extreemly important, if sometimes rather
limited. Of course, I do believe that the majority of developers out there
are not user interface designers, as is perfectly reasonable, and as such
perhaps it would be wise to stick to the guidlines. However, if one feels
that the guidlines are wrong in some point one should of course not follow
it. But to be able to deem something wrong one has first to understand
that thing totally.

The palm ui guidlines as I understand are deigned to make the user understan
the program more quickly as it will be similar to other palm programs as far
as the user interface goes. This might be good in some instances, but in
some other instances it is like using microsofts html-help just cause it is
handy and people recognize it.

Maybe guidlines can help people create better programs? I would rather create
a good one myself, but better is obviously better than the not better.

- Veronica

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification (modeless dialogs)

2003-02-23 Thread Stringer
Subject: Re: Developer Certification ?
From: Scott Gruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Scott wrote:
  What is PalmSource's stance on this technique? 
  According to the UI guidelines, it would appear 
  that this is not valid.
 
 156 * 156 (called full-sized) is indeed valid
 according to the UI Guidelines.
 


There's a difference; the poster that brought up full-sized dialogs 
was talking about 160x160. I use 156 x 156 all the time for preferences 
that need the room. The 160 x 160, I believe, is not valid according to 
the guidelines as you've pointed out. (The original part of the full 
sized dialogs was that there are dots in the corners when you use 160 x 
160 modal dialogs which you shouldn't do.)

BTW, I just went to PalmGear and took a look at some of the screen shots 
posted; of the 10 or so apps I looked at, ALL but 2 had UI issues on the 
one screen that was shown. It is too bad that users tolerate this junk.



Personally I use modal screens extensively for pop-up screens in
our PDE software.  Users are unconcerned and unaware of the 
underlying nature of these screens, except that the centered screen 
title indicates a pop-up screen and not one of the screens on the 
regular flow, which have the left justified title.  
This visual difference is very useful in orienting the user and, to us,
when doing phone support with unsophisticated users.

These screens often have lots of information and/or entry fields.

Now if the screen has a graffiti shift indicator in the bottom right hand 
corner, then that dot disappears.  So any of our pop-up screens with 
entry fields and (in our world) normal button placement do not have
a noticable dot problem.  However, I plead guilty to ignoring these
spurious dots in screens where the design doesn't automatically
hide or disguise them.

I believe that the UI guidelines are incomplete on the subject of
modal screens, and that full screen 160*160 modal screens have
a valid place in UI design in Palm OS.

Roger Stringer
Marietta Systems, Inc.   (www.RF-TP.com)


-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-23 Thread Aaron Ardiri
 I thought that the exam was quite reasonable. There were some things I 
 didn't know, but the week I spent studying before hand helped. However, 
 I have been doing Palm development for about 6 years now, so my 
 experience probably made it easier.

  i personally have not taken the exam - but, looking at the samples
  it did go against one of the principles about 'not being dependent
  on tool chains'; the question regarding the debugger was specific
  to palmdebugger. -- not everyone uses this/and or a debugger at 
  all (you dont need a debugger to write good programs, its all technique)

 As for benefits, my employer requested that I take the exam and become 
 certified. Since I just got listed on that page recently and am getting 
 our MobileCoders profile updated, I'm not sure if it will help us get 
 work. It has however, reaffirmed my skills to one of our large clients.
 
 Personally, if I was shopping for a developer and saw some of the awful 
 programs out there, I'd do whatever I could to ensure that whoever I 
 hired knew what he (or she) was doing. The certification is one gauge 
 that would help.

  certification doesn't really mean much. 

  i wasted time and effort getting Java certified, and, it made absolutely
  no difference to my employment opportunities. i dont blame that for
  the test itself, but, my experience with Java was high enough before i
  sat the test and i had appropriate 'demoable experience/knowledge'
  of the topic.

  i dont think many people have actually done the certification for 
  palmos, and, the majority of developers that actually do have it have
  it solely due to the fact that they helped write the tests themselves.
  for all you know, maybe they were not even capable of passing the 
  test :) its one thing we'll never know. 

  it is a serious pity the offer to help with the exams was only local
  to USA/california as well :( looking at the basic overview, there 
  are a few items that could have been covered (more advanced topics).

 I would also like to see the certification cover some aspects of user 
 interface as this has been one of my biggest complaints over the years 
 about Palm OS application. (Ever seen an app that centers buttons in a 
 dialog or puts the OK button on the right and cancel button on the 
 right?)

  when you write software for a platform; its best to adopt the standard
  of the os by looking at its built in applications. if you go against
  these, you normally should have a good reason to mess everything up.

  maybe one day i'll bother with the certification - but, in the mean
  time i have a pretty solid portfolio of public and private work to 
  back up any experience i have with the platform. its also known well
  that i may go against many rules set by palm just to get the job
  done (which, otherwise would be an impossible task) :) overtime, these
  do not become issues as the os is improved and version checks can be
  made to get around previous limitations (which, required a bit of
  hacking/tweaking) - the fun stuff.

---
Aaron Ardiri   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CEO - CTO  +46 70 656 1143
Mobile Wizardry http://www.mobilewizardry.com/

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-23 Thread Scott Gruby
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 Aaron Ardiri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I thought that the exam was quite reasonable. There were some things I 
  didn't know, but the week I spent studying before hand helped. However, 
  I have been doing Palm development for about 6 years now, so my 
  experience probably made it easier.
 
   i personally have not taken the exam - but, looking at the samples
   it did go against one of the principles about 'not being dependent
   on tool chains'; the question regarding the debugger was specific
   to palmdebugger. -- not everyone uses this/and or a debugger at 
   all (you dont need a debugger to write good programs, its all technique)

Very true; there were some questions that were even platform specific. I 
only had a chance at getting them right because I had read about them 
during my studying.

   when you write software for a platform; its best to adopt the standard
   of the os by looking at its built in applications. if you go against
   these, you normally should have a good reason to mess everything up.

I don't think laziness counts! There is some stuff that I've written 
that has gone against the UI guidelines because the client wanted it 
that way and they have a specific target audience. For general purpose 
software, I think that the guidelines (which are just guides and not 
law) are reasonable.

 
   maybe one day i'll bother with the certification - but, in the mean
   time i have a pretty solid portfolio of public and private work to 
   back up any experience i have with the platform. its also known well
   that i may go against many rules set by palm just to get the job
   done (which, otherwise would be an impossible task) :) overtime, these
   do not become issues as the os is improved and version checks can be
   made to get around previous limitations (which, required a bit of
   hacking/tweaking) - the fun stuff.


While I sort of agree that the certification may not mean much, it at 
least meant I went through the extra effort (I didn't help write the 
test). Some may see this as valuable. Like you, I have a fairly large 
portfolio of projects that demonstrates my abilities.


-- 
Scott Gruby
Palm OS Certified Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.notifymail.com/palm/

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-22 Thread Stringer
Subject: Developer Certification ?
From: Arrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]

...from this page: http://www.palmos.com/dev/certification/developers.html
only looks to be only 14 certified ? this would be:


Speaking for myself, I was always put off by the lack of sample exams 
and a primer.  The comment just read all the manuals and you'll pass
was never motivating.

Most programmers exist in a subset of the total functionality, and would
be lost when presented with questions outside of their normal subset.
I don't know what areas covered in the test are outside of the (large) 
subset that I routinely use, and hence I'm not clear what areas need to be
studied in order to pass the test, if any!

In addition, and again speaking for myself, the nastier parts of the API
set have been encapsulated in function calls and I haven't had to address
some of those issues for a very considerable time.  But that again goes
back to knowing what aspects to study.

Roger Stringer
Marietta Systems, Inc. (www.RF-TP.com)


-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-22 Thread Stringer
Subject: Re: Developer Certification ?
From: Chris Antos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 16:04:17 -0800
X-Message-Number: 39

Scott Gruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ... snip ...

 I would also like to see the certification cover some aspects of user
 interface as this has been one of my biggest complaints over the years
 about Palm OS application. (Ever seen an app that centers buttons in a
 dialog or puts the OK button on the right and cancel button on the
 right?)

How about modal forms located at 0,0 with extents 160,160?  It's wrong and
it looks bad (this is what causes forms to have tiny dots in the corners).
A full-screen modal form should be located at 2,2 with extents 156,156.
It's a small cosmetic thing, but to me it indicates the author is not aware
of some pretty basic things, and that makes me wonder what else is broken,
so I prefer to avoid using such apps.


As someone who often uses full screen modal forms, I consider the 'dot'
issue a minor OS bug.  The OS should be smart enough to recognize 
160x160 modal forms and not draw these annoying dots in the corners.

But you should not look down on programmers who use full screen 
modal forms!  It is, in my humble opinion, a perfectly valid technique.

Roger Stringer
Marietta Systems, Inc.  (www.RF-TP.com)


-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-22 Thread Chris Antos
 How about modal forms located at 0,0 with extents 160,160?  It's wrong
and
 it looks bad (this is what causes forms to have tiny dots in the
corners).
 A full-screen modal form should be located at 2,2 with extents 156,156.
 It's a small cosmetic thing, but to me it indicates the author is not
aware
 of some pretty basic things, and that makes me wonder what else is
broken,
 so I prefer to avoid using such apps.
 

 As someone who often uses full screen modal forms, I consider the 'dot'
 issue a minor OS bug.  The OS should be smart enough to recognize
 160x160 modal forms and not draw these annoying dots in the corners.

 But you should not look down on programmers who use full screen
 modal forms!  It is, in my humble opinion, a perfectly valid technique.

If an app considers it a valid technique, then I would expect the app to at
least employ a workaround to make the forms look nice.  For example, it's
easy enough to clear the corners.

Otherwise I wonder, did the author not notice, or did the author not care?
I'm not so comfortable with either.  Please don't take it personally that I
like to look out for the health of my device.  I've noticed a statistical
correlation between full screen modal forms (something the OS explicitly
does not support, btw -- doesn't disallow does not imply supports) and
newbie mistakes like using globals inside sysAppLaunchCmdSyncNotify or
sysAppLaunchCmdSystemReset, or worse not realizing about launch codes at
all.  ;-)  If it will help you understand where I'm coming from, please
think of my choice to avoid apps which put the modal form frame offscreen as
a little security blanket of mine.  I don't mean to question your
skills -- you may be a rock solid seasoned coder who like the majority of
coders is more concerned with functionality than looks -- in that case it's
my loss, but I enjoy the safety that I've found from this statistical
observation.

But anyway, the original point was that the UI looks bad, and the developer
didn't do anything about it.  It sounds like you agree the dots look bad, so
if you wouldn't mind, could you say why it is that you don't do anything
about them?



-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-22 Thread Scott Gruby
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Subject: Developer Certification ?
 From: Arrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ...from this page: http://www.palmos.com/dev/certification/developers.html
 only looks to be only 14 certified ? this would be:
 
 
 Speaking for myself, I was always put off by the lack of sample exams 
 and a primer.  The comment just read all the manuals and you'll pass
 was never motivating.


There are sample questions on the website (now) that I found quite 
helpful.

 Most programmers exist in a subset of the total functionality, and would
 be lost when presented with questions outside of their normal subset.
 I don't know what areas covered in the test are outside of the (large) 
 subset that I routinely use, and hence I'm not clear what areas need to be
 studied in order to pass the test, if any!

My technique was to read all the items (except for the API reference) 
that the certification website says to use (including the 2 books) and 
do the sample questions. That worked for me.
 
 In addition, and again speaking for myself, the nastier parts of the API
 set have been encapsulated in function calls and I haven't had to address
 some of those issues for a very considerable time.  But that again goes
 back to knowing what aspects to study.

While I do encapsulate a lot of functions of the APIs, I know the 
underlying structure which I believe is important. It is quite 
important, in my opinion, to know what is going on.


-- 
Scott Gruby
Palm OS Certified Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.notifymail.com/palm/

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-22 Thread Scott Gruby
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 
 As someone who often uses full screen modal forms, I consider the 'dot'
 issue a minor OS bug.  The OS should be smart enough to recognize 
 160x160 modal forms and not draw these annoying dots in the corners.


Should I take it that you've never looked at the user interface 
guidelines? Full screen modal dialogs are ugly, in my opinion, and 
should not be used. In my 6 years of Palm development, I have never 
found the need for one.
 
 But you should not look down on programmers who use full screen 
 modal forms!  It is, in my humble opinion, a perfectly valid technique.

What is PalmSource's stance on this technique? According to the UI 
guidelines, it would appear that this is not valid.

Just my opinion...


-- 
Scott Gruby
Palm OS Certified Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.notifymail.com/palm/

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-22 Thread Steve Jerrett
 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stringer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:


As someone who often uses full screen modal forms, I consider the 'dot'
issue a minor OS bug.  The OS should be smart enough to recognize 
160x160 modal forms and not draw these annoying dots in the corners.
I have never seen a need for using full screen modal forms in the almost 
20 years of programming in various languages on a variety of OSs. The 
portion of the UI still visible behind the form is a convention of GUI 
programming communicating to the user that a specific choice needs to be 
made before the app can continue or that an error has occurred 
preventing the app from performing a task or continuing to function.

--
Steve Jerrett
Systems Analyst
City of Columbia, MO
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-22 Thread Oliver
This is an interesting discussion and I agree with
those who have stated that too few developers pay
attention to good user interface design and user
interface design compliance with the published
standards.

I'd be curious to know how many people actually 
downloaded and read that document. If you don't
know what I am talking about, it's available from
this page:

http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/docs/

(search for Palm OS User Interface Guidelines).

To comment on some statements made:

Scott wrote:
 What is PalmSource's stance on this technique? 
 According to the UI guidelines, it would appear 
 that this is not valid.

156 * 156 (called full-sized) is indeed valid
according to the UI Guidelines.

p.54 Palm OS User Interface Guidelines

 begin quote -

Make Modal Forms as Short as Possible 

Although modal forms are always the width of the 
screen, they are not always the height of the screen.
It’s best to make the modal form shorter than the 
screen so that the main form, appearing below the
modal form, provides context. Try to make the modal 
form as short as possible. Allow at least 3 pixels 
of space between the main form’s title bar and the 
top of the modal form. If the modal form obscures
any portion of the main form’s title bar, make the 
modal form the full size of the screen.

 end quote -

(their definition of full sized is 156*156 to 
allow for the border).

Steve wrote:
 I have never seen a need for using full screen 
 modal forms in the almost  20 years of programming 
 in various languages on a variety of OSs. The 
 portion of the UI still visible behind the form 
 is a convention of GUI programming communicating 
 to the user that a specific choice needs to be 
 made before the app can continue or that an error 
 has occurred  preventing the app from performing 
 a task or continuing to function.

Given the size of the screen of most PalmOS devices,
I don't think it is necessarily valid to apply 
experience with other OSs (which, I assume, were 
mostly for larger-screen devices) to the design of
PalmOS applications.

Apparently the designers of PalmOS themselves saw the
need for full-sized dialogs here and there. 

Examples of full-size modal forms in the OS itself
are the calendar and the beam dialog of the launcher.

Oliver


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-22 Thread Scott Gruby
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This is an interesting discussion and I agree with
 those who have stated that too few developers pay
 attention to good user interface design and user
 interface design compliance with the published
 standards.
 
 I'd be curious to know how many people actually 
 downloaded and read that document. If you don't
 know what I am talking about, it's available from
 this page:
 
 http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/docs/
 
 (search for Palm OS User Interface Guidelines).


Apparently not enough. I could point to numerous applications that have 
UI defects. I'm not saying that my stuff is perfect, but I do my best 
to adhere to the guidelines. In a recent exchange I had with another 
developer, he wrote:

I have a cordial dislike for guidelines, although I think internal
consistency is necessary.

With that kind of attitude, no wonder developers haven't read the 
guidelines, let alone attempt to adhere to them.

 To comment on some statements made:
 
 Scott wrote:
  What is PalmSource's stance on this technique? 
  According to the UI guidelines, it would appear 
  that this is not valid.
 
 156 * 156 (called full-sized) is indeed valid
 according to the UI Guidelines.
 


There's a difference; the poster that brought up full-sized dialogs 
was talking about 160x160. I use 156 x 156 all the time for preferences 
that need the room. The 160 x 160, I believe, is not valid according to 
the guidelines as you've pointed out. (The original part of the full 
sized dialogs was that there are dots in the corners when you use 160 x 
160 modal dialogs which you shouldn't do.)

BTW, I just went to PalmGear and took a look at some of the screen shots 
posted; of the 10 or so apps I looked at, ALL but 2 had UI issues on the 
one screen that was shown. It is too bad that users tolerate this junk.


-- 
Scott Gruby
Palm OS Certified Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.notifymail.com/palm/

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-22 Thread Mark Wilden
From: Steve Jerrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 The
 portion of the UI still visible behind the form is a convention of GUI
 programming communicating to the user that a specific choice needs to be
 made before the app can continue or that an error has occurred
 preventing the app from performing a task or continuing to function.

That's certainly true, but isn't the same thing communicated when there is
no portion still visible? It's not very likely the user will think the
full-screen form is modeless.

That said, I agree with sticking with the UI guidelines in general.


-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-22 Thread Mark Wilden
From: Scott Gruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 It is too bad that users tolerate this junk.

Maybe users just don't care as much about UI guidelines as some of us do? :)

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-22 Thread Oliver
Scott wrote:
 There's a difference; the poster that brought 
 up full-sized dialogs was talking about 
 160x160. I use 156 x 156 all the time for 
 preferences that need the room. The 160 x 160, 
 I believe, is not valid according to the 
 guidelines as you've pointed out.

OK, I think I misunderstood you a bit: I somehow
thought you not only didn't like 160*160 screens
-- for good reason -- but also didn't see the need
for having full-screen modal forms in general (and
with full-screen I meant compliant-with-UI-standards
full-screen dialogs, i.e., 156*156).  Sorry about
that.

Like you, I have used 156*156 at times, and I think
if the extra four pixels would have been so 
important to squeeze in more stuff, the screen 
would have had other design problems, too.

 It is too bad that users tolerate this junk.

True.  Not only in the Palm world, of course.

Most of my work as a software developer is 
actually for non-Palm platforms, and it often
amazes me how otherwise skilled developers are so 
ignorant of design guidelines, and often just 
consider their work done when there are still
glaring UI problems to resolve (from simple 
typos to misaligned fields/prompts to 
wrong fonts to modal screens that shouldn't
be modal...).

Oliver




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Developer Certification ?

2003-02-21 Thread Arrow

...from this page: http://www.palmos.com/dev/certification/developers.html
only looks to be only 14 certified ? this would be:
a) i'm reading this wrong and there are thousands
b) developers out there don't think it's worth the time and $175us
c) elaborating on b) - not much benefit / customers don't care about this
certification
d) exam is too hard so, only few have passed
e) other reasons i've missed

...would also like to hear comments from those who have certification if
they feel it's worth it / help get work, etc...

Thanks



-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/



Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-21 Thread John Mitchell


Arrow wrote:
...from this page: http://www.palmos.com/dev/certification/developers.html
only looks to be only 14 certified ? this would be:
a) i'm reading this wrong and there are thousands
a) is the right answer here. If you go to 
http://palmsource.mobilecoders.com/search.asp you'll find a list of 501 
certified developers and firms with certified developers.

Regards

--
John Mitchell
Services Technology Office,
Advanced Development Group,
New Technology Researcher
Internal Tel: x74220
Tel: 303 272 4220   
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-21 Thread Arrow
 ...that page says Palm OS Certified (9) All (501)   ...only 9
companies out of the 501 listed
are certified, also if you click the Palm OS Certified (9) take the
1st company, Austin Lane, for example,
go back to page with the 14 certified developers listed, you will see Rob
Graber works
for this company, hence the certification.

John Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Arrow wrote:
  ...from this page:
http://www.palmos.com/dev/certification/developers.html
  only looks to be only 14 certified ? this would be:
  a) i'm reading this wrong and there are thousands

 a) is the right answer here. If you go to
 http://palmsource.mobilecoders.com/search.asp you'll find a list of 501
 certified developers and firms with certified developers.

 Regards

 --
 John Mitchell

 Services Technology Office,
 Advanced Development Group,
 New Technology Researcher

 Internal Tel: x74220
 Tel: 303 272 4220






-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-21 Thread Scott Gruby
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Arrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 ...from this page: http://www.palmos.com/dev/certification/developers.html
 only looks to be only 14 certified ? this would be:
 a) i'm reading this wrong and there are thousands
 b) developers out there don't think it's worth the time and $175us
 c) elaborating on b) - not much benefit / customers don't care about this
 certification
 d) exam is too hard so, only few have passed
 e) other reasons i've missed
 
 ...would also like to hear comments from those who have certification if
 they feel it's worth it / help get work, etc...
 
 Thanks
 
 
 
 


I thought that the exam was quite reasonable. There were some things I 
didn't know, but the week I spent studying before hand helped. However, 
I have been doing Palm development for about 6 years now, so my 
experience probably made it easier.

As for benefits, my employer requested that I take the exam and become 
certified. Since I just got listed on that page recently and am getting 
our MobileCoders profile updated, I'm not sure if it will help us get 
work. It has however, reaffirmed my skills to one of our large clients.

Personally, if I was shopping for a developer and saw some of the awful 
programs out there, I'd do whatever I could to ensure that whoever I 
hired knew what he (or she) was doing. The certification is one gauge 
that would help.

I would also like to see the certification cover some aspects of user 
interface as this has been one of my biggest complaints over the years 
about Palm OS application. (Ever seen an app that centers buttons in a 
dialog or puts the OK button on the right and cancel button on the 
right?)

-- 
Scott Gruby
Palm OS Certified Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.notifymail.com/palm/

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-21 Thread Henk Jonas


Scott Gruby wrote:
... 
about Palm OS application. (Ever seen an app that centers buttons in a 
dialog or puts the OK button on the right and cancel button on the 
right?)

nope, I never seen this ;-)

Henk



--
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.metaviewsoft.de
A HREF=http://www.handango.com/PlatformTopSoftware.jsp?authorId=95946;
IMG SRC=http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~jonash/werbung_palmos.jpg;/A
-
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-21 Thread Chris Antos
Scott Gruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ... snip ...

 I would also like to see the certification cover some aspects of user
 interface as this has been one of my biggest complaints over the years
 about Palm OS application. (Ever seen an app that centers buttons in a
 dialog or puts the OK button on the right and cancel button on the
 right?)

How about modal forms located at 0,0 with extents 160,160?  It's wrong and
it looks bad (this is what causes forms to have tiny dots in the corners).
A full-screen modal form should be located at 2,2 with extents 156,156.
It's a small cosmetic thing, but to me it indicates the author is not aware
of some pretty basic things, and that makes me wonder what else is broken,
so I prefer to avoid using such apps.



-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Re: Developer Certification ?

2003-02-21 Thread Scott Gruby
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 Chris Antos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Scott Gruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
 news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  ... snip ...
 
  I would also like to see the certification cover some aspects of user
  interface as this has been one of my biggest complaints over the years
  about Palm OS application. (Ever seen an app that centers buttons in a
  dialog or puts the OK button on the right and cancel button on the
  right?)
 
 How about modal forms located at 0,0 with extents 160,160?  It's wrong and
 it looks bad (this is what causes forms to have tiny dots in the corners).
 A full-screen modal form should be located at 2,2 with extents 156,156.
 It's a small cosmetic thing, but to me it indicates the author is not aware
 of some pretty basic things, and that makes me wonder what else is broken,
 so I prefer to avoid using such apps.
 
 
 
 


I'm glad I'm not the only one that has a problem with these minor UI 
items. I've seen a number of highly popular commercial applications that 
suffer from these issues.

(If anyone wants a UI review of your app, let me know...the first basic 
pass is free.)

-- 
Scott Gruby
Palm OS Certified Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.notifymail.com/palm/

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/


Palm Developer Certification Test?

2001-10-29 Thread Steve Palmen

has anyone taken the Certified Developer competency test?  if so, can you
describe the level of detail and the topics covered in the test?  i'm not
looking for the answers, it's just that Palm's description of the test is so
vague that i don't know what to brush up on or learn in order to ensure i
pass the test.  here's a snippet of Palm's description of the test: Writing
The Code; Debugging The Solution; Optimizing The Solution; Conduits.

i checked the ProMetric site - they administer the test - but could find no
prep materials or sample test.  my request to Palm for more info has gone,
as yet, unanswered.

again, i'm not looking to crib your notes from the test, i just want to know
more about what the test covers, and to what level of detail so that i am
prepared.

thanks.

steve







-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/



Re: Palm Developer Certification Test?

2001-10-29 Thread Bradly J. Barton

From: Steve Palmen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 has anyone taken the Certified Developer competency test?  if so, can you
 describe the level of detail and the topics covered in the test?  i'm not

I asked ProMetric about it and this is what I got from them.. still pretty
vague.. I would love to see a sample test as well:

 Thank you for your interest in the Palm Powered Certified Developer
program.
 Here is some more information regarding the program.  If you still have
 questions, please sent your questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Registration

 You can register online for certification exams through Prometric at
 http://www.2test.com/ www.2test.com.   Online registration is currently
 available in the United States, Canada, and in many European countries.
To
 locate a Prometric testing center in your area, visit
 http://www.2test.com/ www.2test.com or call 800-798-EXAM.  The price of
 this exam is $175.

 Exam Topics

 Questions in the exam are derived from the following areas of development:

 * Designing the solution
 * Prototyping the solution
 * Writing the code
 * Testing the solution
 * Debugging the solution
 * Optimizing the solution
 * Documenting the solution
 * Conduits

 Benefits of Certification

 After passing the certification exam, you'll receive a Palm Powered
 Certified Developer Welcome Kit in the mail including a diploma and a CD
 with the Palm Powered Certified Developer logo and usage guidelines.

 Obtaining Results

 Immediately following completion of the exam, you'll receive your score
 report and confirmation of your results.

 Retaking an Exam

  If candidate fails exam on first attempt they must wait 1 week before
 retaking the exam.  If candidate fails after second attempt they must wait
3
 months.  Any candidate who is requesting to take the exam a fourth time
must
 be approved by Palm.

--
Bradly J. Barton - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jenies Technologies Incorporated
(972) 602-1835
http://www.JTI.net
http://HandAble.com



-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/



Re: Palm Developer Certification Test?

2001-10-29 Thread David Fedor

The test covers most everything in Palm OS development world, and tries to
focus on Palm-specific stuff and not on C skills or on details you'd have
to cram.  Look at the documentation chapters for an overview of what the
questions cover!  (One wasn't taken from the other, but they're reasonably
similar, for obvious reasons.)

So for each of the sections they list on the test (designing, coding,
testing, debugging, etc.) make sure you know how to do that well for all
the major technology areas of Palm programming, and you should be pretty
well prepared :-)  Many things will come naturally for those who're
routinely doing Palm OS development, so perhaps the best way to prepare is
to write a few full-featured apps that do most everything, end-to-end,
conduits and UI and memory and comms and so forth.

I've suggested that some of the questions that didn't make the final cut of
the test could be released as samples, for example when we had too many
questions covering one specific area then releasing the unused question
shouldn't hurt as far as I can tell.  Writing to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be the way to request that.

-David Fedor
Palm, Inc.

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/



Re: Palm Developer Certification Test?

2001-10-29 Thread Max Bian

Do I have to know any specific comercial developent tools?  For example, do I
have to know anything about codewarrior at all?

If I stuck with GNU tools, will I be able to experience all the aspects of
palmos after coding some applications as you described?

Max
--- David Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The test covers most everything in Palm OS development world, and tries to
 focus on Palm-specific stuff and not on C skills or on details you'd have
 to cram.  Look at the documentation chapters for an overview of what the
 questions cover!  (One wasn't taken from the other, but they're reasonably
 similar, for obvious reasons.)
 
 So for each of the sections they list on the test (designing, coding,
 testing, debugging, etc.) make sure you know how to do that well for all
 the major technology areas of Palm programming, and you should be pretty
 well prepared :-)  Many things will come naturally for those who're
 routinely doing Palm OS development, so perhaps the best way to prepare is
 to write a few full-featured apps that do most everything, end-to-end,
 conduits and UI and memory and comms and so forth.
 
 I've suggested that some of the questions that didn't make the final cut of
 the test could be released as samples, for example when we had too many
 questions covering one specific area then releasing the unused question
 shouldn't hurt as far as I can tell.  Writing to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be the way to request that.
 
 -David Fedor
 Palm, Inc.
 
 -- 
 For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please
 see http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/



Re: Palm Developer Certification Test?

2001-10-29 Thread David Fedor

Do I have to know any specific comercial developent tools?  For example, do I
have to know anything about codewarrior at all?

If I stuck with GNU tools, will I be able to experience all the aspects of
palmos after coding some applications as you described?


This is a little too detailed for me to be able to respond.  Ask
[EMAIL PROTECTED] because I may or may not know, and if I do
know, I may or may not be able to answer.

Sorry :-)

-David Fedor
Palm, Inc.

-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/



Re: Palm Developer Certification Test?

2001-10-29 Thread Ezekiel Sanborndeasis

I know the goal was to make in non CodeWarrior specific and one criteria for
rejection of a possible question was if it was only applicable to a
programmer using CodeWarrior. I would NOT expect questions like what is the
difference between the different optimization levels in CodeWarrior? It is
a difficult task to decide what is expected knowledge for a palm programmer
and what not. For example, is a developer who only uses Appforge or
Satellite forms, but is very proficient with them, not a qualified Palm
programmer? For this test we do assume a C programmer but try and make no
assumption as to what IDE.

For the purposes of this test, as study material I would go over the
documentation (reference, companion, tools guide, conduit docs, web clipping
guide) and published books like the Palm OS Bible or Neil's Rhodes Developer
Guide (just examples, lots of good books out there). I don't think you need
to do a crash course on CodeWarrior in order to pass the test, but you might
want to look at some of the other tools that come with the SDK. An
understanding of how to use POSE, palm debugger, PRC2OVL, WCA Builder, etc.
is expected. Beyond that, a good knowledge of the APIs, compatibility issues
(backwards and forwards), common mistakes, palm programming principles, etc.
The test is a new test and because of that there is not an abundance of
study material specifically directed at the test or compilations of older
tests available. The questions are not based on obscure quirks that only
come out of detailed inspection of the source. Nor are we trying to trick
developers by swapping parameter order of APIs to see if you notice. If I
were a developer getting ready for the test I would try to review the areas
I do not use too much. The test does look for a large breadth of competency.
If you can make (and debug) an international application with lots of good
Zen of Palm UI, that beams and has wireless connectivity plus a conduit...
you are probably a good candidate for the certification.

-Ezekiel Sanborn de Asis
Palm Developer Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see 
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/