[Paraview] ParaView 4.4 ??

2015-06-10 Thread Mickael Philit

Dear all,

I just came across this interesting webpage: 
http://www.paraview.org/ParaView/index.php/ParaView_4.4_Deliverables

and I would like to know if there is a release schedule for ParaView 4.4.

Best regards

Mickael
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Issue with structured grids and extraction of boundaries with cell data

2015-03-25 Thread Mickael Philit

Hello,

my previous mail was wrong. The present problem is not related to those 
other bugs.
Here, when using ExtractSubset the extent for cell data in miscalculated 
if i==imax or j==jmax or k == kmax.
in vtkExtractGrid.cxx: we have the call 
this-Internal-CopyCellData(inExt,outExt,cd,outCD); that use point extent
and then in vtkExtractStructuredGridHelper.cxx  the extent is computed 
for cells 
vtkStructuredData::GetCellExtentFromPointExtent(outExt,outCellExt);
but this later function does not know about the whole extent of cell 
data. Thus you need to pass down a valid extent for cells before calling it.
If you have inExt = {0, 30, 0, 20, 0, 10} and you pass outExt = 
{0,30,0,20, 10,10} the result outCellExt will be {0,29,0,19,*10,10*} and 
then the copy of cell data will be done outside of the array leading to 
segfault.
The outExt extent should have been corrected to be {0,30,0,20,9,10} or 
{0,30,0,20,9,9}...

I hope it is clearer now.

Best Regards

Mickael

On 20/03/2015 16:26, Etienne Tang wrote:

Hello,

I'm working with a 3D structured dataset containing cell data. I tried
to extract a 2D boundary of this dataset corresponding to the maximum
index of a dimension with the Extract Subset filter and ParaView 4.3.1,
and I found an issue: the resulting dataset is incorrect. It holds cell
data from the opposite boundary (eg. if I try to extract the i = imax
boundary, I get values from i = 0 boundary), and these values are
shifted of one index in the other dimensions.

This case worked with ParaView 4.1.0, maybe it is related to this other
bug about structured data :
http://markmail.org/message/fvatgidqbvnufgi6#query:+page:1+mid:fvatgidqbvnufgi6+state:results
?

Here are some pictures showing the problem on a simple dataset which can
be used to reproduce it:
   - The simple .vts file : http://z1.gb2n.org/pv/test.vts
   - The original dataset : http://z1.gb2n.org/pv/original_dataset.png
   - The result of the ExtractSubset filter to extract the i = imax
boundary : http://z1.gb2n.org/pv/extract_subset.png

Best regards,


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Issue with structured grids and extraction of boundaries with cell data

2015-03-24 Thread Mickael Philit

Hello,

I managed to reproduce the problem. The difference between ParaView 
4.3.1 and previous version

comes to the removal of vtkPVTrivialExtentTranslator in the pipeline.
Thus, the update extent requested by the extract filter may not be 
updated correctly anymore.

It is a similar problem to this other bug:
http://marc.info/?l=paraviewm=142168609529307w=2

Best Regards

Mickael

On 20/03/2015 16:26, Etienne Tang wrote:

Hello,

I'm working with a 3D structured dataset containing cell data. I tried
to extract a 2D boundary of this dataset corresponding to the maximum
index of a dimension with the Extract Subset filter and ParaView 4.3.1,
and I found an issue: the resulting dataset is incorrect. It holds cell
data from the opposite boundary (eg. if I try to extract the i = imax
boundary, I get values from i = 0 boundary), and these values are
shifted of one index in the other dimensions.

This case worked with ParaView 4.1.0, maybe it is related to this other
bug about structured data :
http://markmail.org/message/fvatgidqbvnufgi6#query:+page:1+mid:fvatgidqbvnufgi6+state:results
?

Here are some pictures showing the problem on a simple dataset which can
be used to reproduce it:
   - The simple .vts file : http://z1.gb2n.org/pv/test.vts
   - The original dataset : http://z1.gb2n.org/pv/original_dataset.png
   - The result of the ExtractSubset filter to extract the i = imax
boundary : http://z1.gb2n.org/pv/extract_subset.png

Best regards,


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Fwd: Gradient of Unstructed dataset

2015-03-17 Thread Mickael Philit

Hello,

sorry to intrude,
I think the problem may come from the CGNS loader of ParaView.
When using the CGNS plugin from ParaView development version, you get 
the same picture as Ensight.

My two cents

Mickael

On 17/03/2015 05:04, Masaaki SHOJIMA wrote:

Hi Berk,

I appreciate your kindness

Here, I attaches the data.
Compare Gradient.pdf (252KB)

A calculated field by SC/Tetra solver is uploaded in Dropbox. (Calc.zip)
Please download the data. It contains FLD format for SC/Tetra post and 
CGNS format for Ensight and Paraview.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/5fpeu1qwhyzjn5u/Calc.zip?dl=0

(1) I calculated the flow and the pressure in a simple cylinder for a 
test ( diameter 0.005m, length 0.01m). Plug flow at inlet with 0.03 m/s.


(2) Data were transfered to Ensight and Paraview in CGNS format.

(3) Pressure was mapped on the surface and compared between SC/Tetra 
post, Ensight and Paraview. All application provided same results.


(4) Gradient (pressure) was calculated in each post and z-component of 
Gradient (pressure) was visualized with same colored contour. Only 
paraview provided a different image because the computed gradients in 
paraview had half values compared to SC/Tetra post and Ensight.


(5) Gradient (velocity-X) was also calculated in each post and the 
X-component of Grad (velocity-X) was visualized. Same results as shown 
in 4.



Thanks a lot.

Masaaki




___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] cgns - Paraview loader

2015-02-09 Thread Mickael Philit

The CGNS plugin is not present in nighty builds.
You may have an unrelated problem. Have you check your cgns file with 
the /cgnscheck/ utility ?

Can you provide more information about the error output from ParaView ?

Mickael

On 09/02/2015 15:18, Manuel Gageik wrote:

Hi Mickael,

I downloaded the nightly build 
ParaView-Linux-64bit-glibc-2.3.6-NIGHTLY.tar.gz since it is not easy 
for me to compile paraview on my computer. This build causes error 
while loading cgns-files. Do you have any recent informations about 
the status of the implementation of your patch to paraview?


Kind regards
Manuel


Am 03.12.2014 um 19:13 schrieb Mickael Philit:

Hello,

right now there is no binary available.
The plugin is in the master development branch of Paraview. Thus, the 
plugin should be released in the next ParaView  but I am not sure 
that it will be there by default (You should ask on the ParaView user 
mainling list for confirmation by kitware guys).
So, if you really need it now, your best option is to download 
ParaView sources through git and compile your own ParaView binary.


Regards

Mickael




On 03/12/2014 11:33, Dipl.-Ing. Manuel Gageik wrote:

Hello,

I have read in the forum Paraview-developers that you have develeoped
a ParaView reader for CGNS file format. I am very interested in it 
since
I have large cgns-files to load. How do I get this plugin? Do you 
have a

binary to download. Will it be released in ParaView 4.3 ?

Kind regards
Manuel Gageik







___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Performance of the CGNS Reader

2013-08-29 Thread Mickael Philit


Hello,

First, the CGNS reader coming through the VisItBridge is not working in 
parallel, it's a plain serial reader.
Second, there are limitations to the current cgns reader way of doing 
thing, since :
  - At the beginning, it parses the whole file (this takes a lot of 
time) to get variable names, blocks and so on, before actually reading 
the data.  [ I think that tecplot is cleaner because it seems to read 
the whole CGNS file in one pass ]
 - meshes are read in a temporary array and converted to a VTK vector 
of coordinates (thus memory manipulation)
 - for unstructured meshes, convertion from 'integer' to 'long' of 
cells connectivity eats memory.
The CGNS reader can improve but at the cost of redesining some parts to 
fit better in paraview and go for parallel.


Mickael


On 29/08/2013 16:50, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY ARL (US) wrote:

As a followup to this that may be related - does the CGNS reader through the 
VisItBridge work in parallel?I've loaded up a couple of different CGNS 
datasets and then applied the ProcessIDScalars filter and it doesn't appear to 
be distributing the data - even multi-block CGNS files.



Rick Angelini

USArmy Research Laboratory
CISD/HPC Architectures Team
Building 120 Cube 315
Phone:  410-278-6266


From: paraview-boun...@paraview.org [paraview-boun...@paraview.org] on behalf 
of Richard GRENON [richard.gre...@onera.fr]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 10:38 AM
To: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: [Paraview]  Performance of the CGNS Reader

Hello.

I am testing the CGNS reader of Paraview 4.0.1 64 bits running on a
Linux Workstation having 4 CPUs and 5.8 Gbytes of memory. Paraview was
installed from the binaries available on the download page.

I am trying to load a 1.36 Gbytes CGNS file that is available through
the network.

While loading this file, the Paraview Windows is frozen and cannot be
refreshed, and I must check with the ps command on a terminal window
or with a system monitor if PV  is still running or if it is really
frozen. A progress bar for all readers would be welcome in a next release.

Finally, the file can be loaded, but it always takes about 15 mn (+ or -
1 mn depending of the load of the network), while Tecplot always loads
the same file within less that 1 mn !

How do you explain this poor performance of the CGNS reader ? Can it be
improved, or am I missing something ? Is there some Paraview option that
could reduce loading time of large files ?

Best regards

--
   Richard GRENON
   ONERA
   Departement d'Aerodynamique Appliquee - DAAP/ACI
   8 rue des Vertugadins
   92190 MEUDON - FRANCE
   phone : +33 1 46 73 42 17
   fax   : +33 1 46 73 41 46
   mailto:richard.gre...@onera.fr
   http://www.onera.fr

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


[Paraview] GL2PSExporter and python

2013-01-14 Thread Mickael PHILIT

Hello,

I am testing GL2PSExporter in paraview 3.98 from python shell.
Thus, I do:
 exporters = servermanager.createModule('exporters')
 svgExport = exporters.GL2PSExporterSVG()
 svgExport.SetRenderWindow( view1 )
 svgExport.FileName = /home/mickael/test.svg
 svgExport.Write()

Unfortunately, it crashes paraview.
It seems that SetRenderWindow and Write methods are not available in python.
Did I do something wrong or is it a bug in python wrapping ??

Best Regards

Mickael PHILIT



___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview