Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?

2010-08-20 Thread chris hallsworth
Hi I wear digital hearing aids and always will. So much better quality; 
it's as if I'm listening to a CD or MP3 all the time! Also I've noticed 
the latest digital hearing aids simulate surround sound! Anyone else 
noticed this?


Sent using Thunderbird

On 19/08/2010 23:33, Gary Schindler wrote:

Chris, that is what I do, put the headphones over the hearing aides. do
you have analog or digital aides, for that makes all the difference in
the world. my digital aides are natural sounding like hearing should be!
I have an old pair of analog aides which are sometimes on the sharp side.
- Original Message - From: chris hallsworth
christopher...@googlemail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?



Hello all,
I tell you something, but audio sounds brilliant with my headphones
sitting on top of my hearing aids, which is how I am listening to the
computer right now!
So I will put it down to my laptop speakers rather than hearing aids.
Thanks all for the help.

Sent using Thunderbird

On 19/08/2010 14:53, Dane Trethowan wrote:

Ignore that, the whole purpose of VBR is to encode every sample at a
bit rate, you don't want encoding of say silent samples done at 128k
as that's just wasting band width.


On 19/08/2010, at 11:47 PM, richard claypool wrote:


I'd not set the min quality for as low as posible because that's too
low. i'd set maybe 128 as your lowest point, and then whatever you
want as your highest point. If you can't hear above 192, and won't
be shairng the files, then maybe set it to 192.

msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://last.fm/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - From: Dane
Trethowangrtd...@internode.on.net
To: PC Audio Discussion Listpc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?



Well really this is a very strange questions, I've been wearing
digital hearing aids for 15 years and I'n now asking myself, why
should encoding of sound be any different to those wearing hearing
aids than for those who are not? By that I mean you encode the way
you want and the way you like but one thing I do know when wearing
good hearing instruments is that you want the best quality sound
you can get. An audio engineer once recommended me use VBR quality
and I did post instructions on how to set this up with LAME and
what all the settings meant quite some time ago so I'm sure you'll
find it if you look in the archives. Basically what you need to do
is set the minimum bit rate to as low as possible and the maximum
bit rate to as high as possible. There are 2 quality bit rates, the
VBR bit rate will need to be changed according to what you're
encoding but a good setting for music is 3, the lower the number
then the less the encoder rejects from the encoding. If yo

u set the VBR quality to 1 then you may as well use a lossless
compression such as FLAC. Use Joint stereo.


Of course I'm referring to MP3 encoding with LAME here.


On 19/08/2010, at 3:03 AM, chris hallsworth wrote:


Hello all,
I have been equipped with two very powerful digital hearing aids
literally today. I'm wondering what is the best in terms of audio
quality. By that I mean things like 44,100HZ 16 bit or 128KBPS.
Many thanks in advance for any suggestions.

--
Sent using Thunderbird

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?

2010-08-20 Thread Gary Schindler

Ok I got it Chris. I got in late on this thread.

- Original Message - 
From: chris hallsworth christopher...@googlemail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 3:35 AM
Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?


Hi I wear digital hearing aids and always will. So much better quality; 
it's as if I'm listening to a CD or MP3 all the time! Also I've noticed 
the latest digital hearing aids simulate surround sound! Anyone else 
noticed this?


Sent using Thunderbird

On 19/08/2010 23:33, Gary Schindler wrote:

Chris, that is what I do, put the headphones over the hearing aides. do
you have analog or digital aides, for that makes all the difference in
the world. my digital aides are natural sounding like hearing should be!
I have an old pair of analog aides which are sometimes on the sharp side.
- Original Message - From: chris hallsworth
christopher...@googlemail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?



Hello all,
I tell you something, but audio sounds brilliant with my headphones
sitting on top of my hearing aids, which is how I am listening to the
computer right now!
So I will put it down to my laptop speakers rather than hearing aids.
Thanks all for the help.

Sent using Thunderbird

On 19/08/2010 14:53, Dane Trethowan wrote:

Ignore that, the whole purpose of VBR is to encode every sample at a
bit rate, you don't want encoding of say silent samples done at 128k
as that's just wasting band width.


On 19/08/2010, at 11:47 PM, richard claypool wrote:


I'd not set the min quality for as low as posible because that's too
low. i'd set maybe 128 as your lowest point, and then whatever you
want as your highest point. If you can't hear above 192, and won't
be shairng the files, then maybe set it to 192.

msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://last.fm/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - From: Dane
Trethowangrtd...@internode.on.net
To: PC Audio Discussion Listpc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?



Well really this is a very strange questions, I've been wearing
digital hearing aids for 15 years and I'n now asking myself, why
should encoding of sound be any different to those wearing hearing
aids than for those who are not? By that I mean you encode the way
you want and the way you like but one thing I do know when wearing
good hearing instruments is that you want the best quality sound
you can get. An audio engineer once recommended me use VBR quality
and I did post instructions on how to set this up with LAME and
what all the settings meant quite some time ago so I'm sure you'll
find it if you look in the archives. Basically what you need to do
is set the minimum bit rate to as low as possible and the maximum
bit rate to as high as possible. There are 2 quality bit rates, the
VBR bit rate will need to be changed according to what you're
encoding but a good setting for music is 3, the lower the number
then the less the encoder rejects from the encoding. If yo

u set the VBR quality to 1 then you may as well use a lossless
compression such as FLAC. Use Joint stereo.


Of course I'm referring to MP3 encoding with LAME here.


On 19/08/2010, at 3:03 AM, chris hallsworth wrote:


Hello all,
I have been equipped with two very powerful digital hearing aids
literally today. I'm wondering what is the best in terms of audio
quality. By that I mean things like 44,100HZ 16 bit or 128KBPS.
Many thanks in advance for any suggestions.

--
Sent using Thunderbird

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?

2010-08-20 Thread André van Deventer
The best quality still is I think if you can connect your hearing aids
directly to the sound source.  You cut out the microphones completely.

Most if not all modern hearing aids have the ability to take an audio shoe
or boot which fits into the back of the aid.  At the end is a 3 pronged
socket into whnich you plug in what is called a euro plug I think.  Someone
simply has to make up some cables for you with a euro plug on one end and
whatever plug is needed on the other.

And yes I must agree that especially the lower frequencies of the newer
digital aids cannot really be compared to what was available on the analog
ones.  I can get my phonak naidas down to somewhere between 35 and 40 Hz
that I can assure you for a hearing aid is rather impressive.

Andre

 

-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Gary Schindler
Sent: 20 August 2010 12:33 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?

Chris, that is what I do, put the headphones over the hearing aides. do you
have analog or digital aides, for that makes all the difference in the
world. my digital aides are natural sounding like hearing should be! I have
an old pair of analog aides which are sometimes on the sharp side.
- Original Message -
From: chris hallsworth christopher...@googlemail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?


 Hello all,
 I tell you something, but audio sounds brilliant with my headphones 
 sitting on top of my hearing aids, which is how I am listening to the 
 computer right now!
 So I will put it down to my laptop speakers rather than hearing aids.
 Thanks all for the help.

 Sent using Thunderbird

 On 19/08/2010 14:53, Dane Trethowan wrote:
 Ignore that, the whole purpose of VBR is to encode every sample at a 
 bit rate, you don't want encoding of say silent samples done at 128k 
 as that's just wasting band width.


 On 19/08/2010, at 11:47 PM, richard claypool wrote:

 I'd not set the min quality for as low as posible because that's too 
 low. i'd set maybe 128 as your lowest point, and then whatever you 
 want as your highest point.  If you can't hear above 192, and won't 
 be shairng the files, then maybe set it to 192.

 msn
 bellevue@gmail.com
 skype
 lord_of_beer
 last fm
 http://last.fm/lord_of_beer

 - Original Message - From: Dane 
 Trethowangrtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion Listpc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:31 AM
 Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?


 Well really this is a very strange questions, I've been wearing 
 digital hearing aids for 15 years and I'n now asking myself, why 
 should encoding of sound be any different to those wearing hearing 
 aids than for those who are not? By that I mean you encode the way 
 you want and the way you like but one thing I do know when wearing 
 good hearing instruments is that you want the best quality sound 
 you can get.  An audio engineer once recommended me use VBR quality 
 and I did post instructions on how to set this up with LAME and 
 what all the settings meant quite some time ago so I'm sure you'll 
 find it if you look in the archives.  Basically what you need to do 
 is set the minimum bit rate to as low as possible and the maximum bit
rate to as high as possible.
 There are 2 quality bit rates, the VBR bit rate will need to be 
 changed according to what you're encoding but a good setting for 
 music is 3, the lower the number then the less the encoder 
 rejects from the encoding.  If yo
 u set the VBR quality to 1 then you may as well use a lossless 
 compression such as FLAC.  Use Joint stereo.

 Of course I'm referring to MP3 encoding with LAME here.


 On 19/08/2010, at 3:03 AM, chris hallsworth wrote:

 Hello all,
 I have been equipped with two very powerful digital hearing aids 
 literally today. I'm wondering what is the best in terms of audio 
 quality. By that I mean things like 44,100HZ 16 bit or 128KBPS.
 Many thanks in advance for any suggestions.

 --
 Sent using Thunderbird

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?

2010-08-19 Thread chris hallsworth

Hello all,
I have been equipped with two very powerful digital hearing aids 
literally today. I'm wondering what is the best in terms of audio 
quality. By that I mean things like 44,100HZ 16 bit or 128KBPS.

Many thanks in advance for any suggestions.

--
Sent using Thunderbird

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?

2010-08-19 Thread Dane Trethowan
Well really this is a very strange questions, I've been wearing digital hearing 
aids for 15 years and I'n now asking myself, why should encoding of sound be 
any different to those wearing hearing aids than for those who are not? By that 
I mean you encode the way you want and the way you like but one thing I do know 
when wearing good hearing instruments is that you want the best quality sound 
you can get.  An audio engineer once recommended me use VBR quality and I did 
post instructions on how to set this up with LAME and what all the settings 
meant quite some time ago so I'm sure you'll find it if you look in the 
archives.  Basically what you need to do is set the minimum bit rate to as low 
as possible and the maximum bit rate to as high as possible.  There are 2 
quality bit rates, the VBR bit rate will need to be changed according to what 
you're encoding but a good setting for music is 3, the lower the number then 
the less the encoder rejects from the encoding.  If you set the VBR quality to 
1 then you may as well use a lossless compression such as FLAC.  Use Joint 
stereo.

Of course I'm referring to MP3 encoding with LAME here.


On 19/08/2010, at 3:03 AM, chris hallsworth wrote:

 Hello all,
 I have been equipped with two very powerful digital hearing aids literally 
 today. I'm wondering what is the best in terms of audio quality. By that I 
 mean things like 44,100HZ 16 bit or 128KBPS.
 Many thanks in advance for any suggestions.
 
 -- 
 Sent using Thunderbird
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?

2010-08-19 Thread richard claypool
I'd not set the min quality for as low as posible because that's too low. 
i'd set maybe 128 as your lowest point, and then whatever you want as your 
highest point.  If you can't hear above 192, and won't be shairng the files, 
then maybe set it to 192.


msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://last.fm/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?


Well really this is a very strange questions, I've been wearing digital 
hearing aids for 15 years and I'n now asking myself, why should encoding 
of sound be any different to those wearing hearing aids than for those who 
are not? By that I mean you encode the way you want and the way you like 
but one thing I do know when wearing good hearing instruments is that you 
want the best quality sound you can get.  An audio engineer once 
recommended me use VBR quality and I did post instructions on how to set 
this up with LAME and what all the settings meant quite some time ago so 
I'm sure you'll find it if you look in the archives.  Basically what you 
need to do is set the minimum bit rate to as low as possible and the 
maximum bit rate to as high as possible.  There are 2 quality bit rates, 
the VBR bit rate will need to be changed according to what you're encoding 
but a good setting for music is 3, the lower the number then the less 
the encoder rejects from the encoding.  If you set the VBR quality to 1 
then you may as well use a lossless compression such as FLAC.  Use Joint 
stereo.


Of course I'm referring to MP3 encoding with LAME here.


On 19/08/2010, at 3:03 AM, chris hallsworth wrote:


Hello all,
I have been equipped with two very powerful digital hearing aids 
literally today. I'm wondering what is the best in terms of audio 
quality. By that I mean things like 44,100HZ 16 bit or 128KBPS.

Many thanks in advance for any suggestions.

--
Sent using Thunderbird

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?

2010-08-19 Thread Dane Trethowan
Ignore that, the whole purpose of VBR is to encode every sample at a bit rate, 
you don't want encoding of say silent samples done at 128k as that's just 
wasting band width.


On 19/08/2010, at 11:47 PM, richard claypool wrote:

 I'd not set the min quality for as low as posible because that's too low. i'd 
 set maybe 128 as your lowest point, and then whatever you want as your 
 highest point.  If you can't hear above 192, and won't be shairng the files, 
 then maybe set it to 192.
 
 msn
 bellevue@gmail.com
 skype
 lord_of_beer
 last fm
 http://last.fm/lord_of_beer
 
 - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:31 AM
 Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?
 
 
 Well really this is a very strange questions, I've been wearing digital 
 hearing aids for 15 years and I'n now asking myself, why should encoding of 
 sound be any different to those wearing hearing aids than for those who are 
 not? By that I mean you encode the way you want and the way you like but one 
 thing I do know when wearing good hearing instruments is that you want the 
 best quality sound you can get.  An audio engineer once recommended me use 
 VBR quality and I did post instructions on how to set this up with LAME and 
 what all the settings meant quite some time ago so I'm sure you'll find it 
 if you look in the archives.  Basically what you need to do is set the 
 minimum bit rate to as low as possible and the maximum bit rate to as high 
 as possible.  There are 2 quality bit rates, the VBR bit rate will need to 
 be changed according to what you're encoding but a good setting for music is 
 3, the lower the number then the less the encoder rejects from the 
 encoding.  If you set the VBR quality to 1 then you may as well use a 
 lossless compression such as FLAC.  Use Joint stereo.
 
 Of course I'm referring to MP3 encoding with LAME here.
 
 
 On 19/08/2010, at 3:03 AM, chris hallsworth wrote:
 
 Hello all,
 I have been equipped with two very powerful digital hearing aids literally 
 today. I'm wondering what is the best in terms of audio quality. By that I 
 mean things like 44,100HZ 16 bit or 128KBPS.
 Many thanks in advance for any suggestions.
 
 -- 
 Sent using Thunderbird
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?

2010-08-19 Thread André van Deventer
As a person with a hearing aid in one ear and a cochlear implant in another
ear, I still encode as high as I possibly can.  Try to get some kind of
direct connection to your hearing aids if at all possible.

Andre

 

-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
Sent: 19 August 2010 03:54 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?

Ignore that, the whole purpose of VBR is to encode every sample at a bit
rate, you don't want encoding of say silent samples done at 128k as that's
just wasting band width.


On 19/08/2010, at 11:47 PM, richard claypool wrote:

 I'd not set the min quality for as low as posible because that's too low.
i'd set maybe 128 as your lowest point, and then whatever you want as your
highest point.  If you can't hear above 192, and won't be shairng the files,
then maybe set it to 192.
 
 msn
 bellevue@gmail.com
 skype
 lord_of_beer
 last fm
 http://last.fm/lord_of_beer
 
 - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan 
 grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:31 AM
 Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?
 
 
 Well really this is a very strange questions, I've been wearing 
 digital hearing aids for 15 years and I'n now asking myself, why 
 should encoding of sound be any different to those wearing hearing 
 aids than for those who are not? By that I mean you encode the way 
 you want and the way you like but one thing I do know when wearing 
 good hearing instruments is that you want the best quality sound you 
 can get.  An audio engineer once recommended me use VBR quality and I 
 did post instructions on how to set this up with LAME and what all 
 the settings meant quite some time ago so I'm sure you'll find it if 
 you look in the archives.  Basically what you need to do is set the 
 minimum bit rate to as low as possible and the maximum bit rate to as 
 high as possible.  There are 2 quality bit rates, the VBR bit rate 
 will need to be changed according to what you're encoding but a good 
 setting for music is 3, the lower the number then the less the 
 encoder rejects from the encoding.  If you
 set the VBR quality to 1 then you may as well use a lossless compression
such as FLAC.  Use Joint stereo.
 
 Of course I'm referring to MP3 encoding with LAME here.
 
 
 On 19/08/2010, at 3:03 AM, chris hallsworth wrote:
 
 Hello all,
 I have been equipped with two very powerful digital hearing aids
literally today. I'm wondering what is the best in terms of audio quality.
By that I mean things like 44,100HZ 16 bit or 128KBPS.
 Many thanks in advance for any suggestions.
 
 --
 Sent using Thunderbird
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?

2010-08-19 Thread chris hallsworth

Hello all,
I tell you something, but audio sounds brilliant with my headphones 
sitting on top of my hearing aids, which is how I am listening to the 
computer right now!

So I will put it down to my laptop speakers rather than hearing aids.
Thanks all for the help.

Sent using Thunderbird

On 19/08/2010 14:53, Dane Trethowan wrote:

Ignore that, the whole purpose of VBR is to encode every sample at a bit rate, 
you don't want encoding of say silent samples done at 128k as that's just 
wasting band width.


On 19/08/2010, at 11:47 PM, richard claypool wrote:


I'd not set the min quality for as low as posible because that's too low. i'd 
set maybe 128 as your lowest point, and then whatever you want as your highest 
point.  If you can't hear above 192, and won't be shairng the files, then maybe 
set it to 192.

msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://last.fm/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - From: Dane Trethowangrtd...@internode.on.net
To: PC Audio Discussion Listpc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?



Well really this is a very strange questions, I've been wearing digital hearing aids for 
15 years and I'n now asking myself, why should encoding of sound be any different to 
those wearing hearing aids than for those who are not? By that I mean you encode the way 
you want and the way you like but one thing I do know when wearing good hearing 
instruments is that you want the best quality sound you can get.  An audio engineer once 
recommended me use VBR quality and I did post instructions on how to set this up with 
LAME and what all the settings meant quite some time ago so I'm sure you'll find it if 
you look in the archives.  Basically what you need to do is set the minimum bit rate to 
as low as possible and the maximum bit rate to as high as possible.  There are 2 quality 
bit rates, the VBR bit rate will need to be changed according to what you're encoding but 
a good setting for music is 3, the lower the number then the less the encoder 
rejects from the encoding.  If yo

u set the VBR quality to 1 then you may as well use a lossless compression 
such as FLAC.  Use Joint stereo.


Of course I'm referring to MP3 encoding with LAME here.


On 19/08/2010, at 3:03 AM, chris hallsworth wrote:


Hello all,
I have been equipped with two very powerful digital hearing aids literally 
today. I'm wondering what is the best in terms of audio quality. By that I mean 
things like 44,100HZ 16 bit or 128KBPS.
Many thanks in advance for any suggestions.

--
Sent using Thunderbird

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?

2010-08-19 Thread Gary Schindler
Chris, that is what I do, put the headphones over the hearing aides. do you 
have analog or digital aides, for that makes all the difference in the 
world. my digital aides are natural sounding like hearing should be! I have 
an old pair of analog aides which are sometimes on the sharp side.
- Original Message - 
From: chris hallsworth christopher...@googlemail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?



Hello all,
I tell you something, but audio sounds brilliant with my headphones 
sitting on top of my hearing aids, which is how I am listening to the 
computer right now!

So I will put it down to my laptop speakers rather than hearing aids.
Thanks all for the help.

Sent using Thunderbird

On 19/08/2010 14:53, Dane Trethowan wrote:
Ignore that, the whole purpose of VBR is to encode every sample at a bit 
rate, you don't want encoding of say silent samples done at 128k as 
that's just wasting band width.



On 19/08/2010, at 11:47 PM, richard claypool wrote:

I'd not set the min quality for as low as posible because that's too 
low. i'd set maybe 128 as your lowest point, and then whatever you want 
as your highest point.  If you can't hear above 192, and won't be 
shairng the files, then maybe set it to 192.


msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://last.fm/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - From: Dane 
Trethowangrtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion Listpc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?


Well really this is a very strange questions, I've been wearing digital 
hearing aids for 15 years and I'n now asking myself, why should 
encoding of sound be any different to those wearing hearing aids than 
for those who are not? By that I mean you encode the way you want and 
the way you like but one thing I do know when wearing good hearing 
instruments is that you want the best quality sound you can get.  An 
audio engineer once recommended me use VBR quality and I did post 
instructions on how to set this up with LAME and what all the settings 
meant quite some time ago so I'm sure you'll find it if you look in the 
archives.  Basically what you need to do is set the minimum bit rate to 
as low as possible and the maximum bit rate to as high as possible. 
There are 2 quality bit rates, the VBR bit rate will need to be changed 
according to what you're encoding but a good setting for music is 3, 
the lower the number then the less the encoder rejects from the 
encoding.  If yo
u set the VBR quality to 1 then you may as well use a lossless 
compression such as FLAC.  Use Joint stereo.


Of course I'm referring to MP3 encoding with LAME here.


On 19/08/2010, at 3:03 AM, chris hallsworth wrote:


Hello all,
I have been equipped with two very powerful digital hearing aids 
literally today. I'm wondering what is the best in terms of audio 
quality. By that I mean things like 44,100HZ 16 bit or 128KBPS.

Many thanks in advance for any suggestions.

--
Sent using Thunderbird

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?

2010-08-19 Thread Dane Trethowan
I believe he said he had digital smile.

Yes I used to put headphones over my hearing-aids but I can tell you know, if 
you can manage a direct connection to your hearing aids then you'll be doing 
yourself a huge favour! that's already been mentioned on list.

I reviewed one device which may allow you to do this and its called the Tek 
Controller, listen to it at www.blindcooltech.com


On 20/08/2010, at 8:33 AM, Gary Schindler wrote:

 Chris, that is what I do, put the headphones over the hearing aides. do you 
 have analog or digital aides, for that makes all the difference in the world. 
 my digital aides are natural sounding like hearing should be! I have an old 
 pair of analog aides which are sometimes on the sharp side.
 - Original Message - From: chris hallsworth 
 christopher...@googlemail.com
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:17 PM
 Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?
 
 
 Hello all,
 I tell you something, but audio sounds brilliant with my headphones sitting 
 on top of my hearing aids, which is how I am listening to the computer right 
 now!
 So I will put it down to my laptop speakers rather than hearing aids.
 Thanks all for the help.
 
 Sent using Thunderbird
 
 On 19/08/2010 14:53, Dane Trethowan wrote:
 Ignore that, the whole purpose of VBR is to encode every sample at a bit 
 rate, you don't want encoding of say silent samples done at 128k as that's 
 just wasting band width.
 
 
 On 19/08/2010, at 11:47 PM, richard claypool wrote:
 
 I'd not set the min quality for as low as posible because that's too low. 
 i'd set maybe 128 as your lowest point, and then whatever you want as your 
 highest point.  If you can't hear above 192, and won't be shairng the 
 files, then maybe set it to 192.
 
 msn
 bellevue@gmail.com
 skype
 lord_of_beer
 last fm
 http://last.fm/lord_of_beer
 
 - Original Message - From: Dane 
 Trethowangrtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion Listpc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:31 AM
 Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?
 
 
 Well really this is a very strange questions, I've been wearing digital 
 hearing aids for 15 years and I'n now asking myself, why should encoding 
 of sound be any different to those wearing hearing aids than for those 
 who are not? By that I mean you encode the way you want and the way you 
 like but one thing I do know when wearing good hearing instruments is 
 that you want the best quality sound you can get.  An audio engineer once 
 recommended me use VBR quality and I did post instructions on how to set 
 this up with LAME and what all the settings meant quite some time ago so 
 I'm sure you'll find it if you look in the archives.  Basically what you 
 need to do is set the minimum bit rate to as low as possible and the 
 maximum bit rate to as high as possible. There are 2 quality bit rates, 
 the VBR bit rate will need to be changed according to what you're 
 encoding but a good setting for music is 3, the lower the number then 
 the less the encoder rejects from the encoding.  If yo
 u set the VBR quality to 1 then you may as well use a lossless compression 
 such as FLAC.  Use Joint stereo.
 
 Of course I'm referring to MP3 encoding with LAME here.
 
 
 On 19/08/2010, at 3:03 AM, chris hallsworth wrote:
 
 Hello all,
 I have been equipped with two very powerful digital hearing aids 
 literally today. I'm wondering what is the best in terms of audio 
 quality. By that I mean things like 44,100HZ 16 bit or 128KBPS.
 Many thanks in advance for any suggestions.
 
 --
 Sent using Thunderbird
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 
 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?

2010-08-19 Thread Gary Schindler

Thanks Dane, I shall have a listen.
- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?



I believe he said he had digital smile.

Yes I used to put headphones over my hearing-aids but I can tell you know, 
if you can manage a direct connection to your hearing aids then you'll be 
doing yourself a huge favour! that's already been mentioned on list.


I reviewed one device which may allow you to do this and its called the 
Tek Controller, listen to it at www.blindcooltech.com



On 20/08/2010, at 8:33 AM, Gary Schindler wrote:

Chris, that is what I do, put the headphones over the hearing aides. do 
you have analog or digital aides, for that makes all the difference in 
the world. my digital aides are natural sounding like hearing should be! 
I have an old pair of analog aides which are sometimes on the sharp side.
- Original Message - From: chris hallsworth 
christopher...@googlemail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?



Hello all,
I tell you something, but audio sounds brilliant with my headphones 
sitting on top of my hearing aids, which is how I am listening to the 
computer right now!

So I will put it down to my laptop speakers rather than hearing aids.
Thanks all for the help.

Sent using Thunderbird

On 19/08/2010 14:53, Dane Trethowan wrote:
Ignore that, the whole purpose of VBR is to encode every sample at a 
bit rate, you don't want encoding of say silent samples done at 128k as 
that's just wasting band width.



On 19/08/2010, at 11:47 PM, richard claypool wrote:

I'd not set the min quality for as low as posible because that's too 
low. i'd set maybe 128 as your lowest point, and then whatever you 
want as your highest point.  If you can't hear above 192, and won't be 
shairng the files, then maybe set it to 192.


msn
bellevue@gmail.com
skype
lord_of_beer
last fm
http://last.fm/lord_of_beer

- Original Message - From: Dane 
Trethowangrtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion Listpc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?


Well really this is a very strange questions, I've been wearing 
digital hearing aids for 15 years and I'n now asking myself, why 
should encoding of sound be any different to those wearing hearing 
aids than for those who are not? By that I mean you encode the way 
you want and the way you like but one thing I do know when wearing 
good hearing instruments is that you want the best quality sound you 
can get.  An audio engineer once recommended me use VBR quality and I 
did post instructions on how to set this up with LAME and what all 
the settings meant quite some time ago so I'm sure you'll find it if 
you look in the archives.  Basically what you need to do is set the 
minimum bit rate to as low as possible and the maximum bit rate to as 
high as possible. There are 2 quality bit rates, the VBR bit rate 
will need to be changed according to what you're encoding but a good 
setting for music is 3, the lower the number then the less the 
encoder rejects from the encoding.  If yo
u set the VBR quality to 1 then you may as well use a lossless 
compression such as FLAC.  Use Joint stereo.


Of course I'm referring to MP3 encoding with LAME here.


On 19/08/2010, at 3:03 AM, chris hallsworth wrote:


Hello all,
I have been equipped with two very powerful digital hearing aids 
literally today. I'm wondering what is the best in terms of audio 
quality. By that I mean things like 44,100HZ 16 bit or 128KBPS.

Many thanks in advance for any suggestions.

--
Sent using Thunderbird

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org