Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
Hi all, Thanks to those who responded to the poll. It confirms the consensus we originally had in the room. The I-D is adopted as a WG document. Authors, please submit draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-00. Cheers, Jon & Julien Jan. 22, 2018 - julien.meu...@orange.com: > Hi all, > > Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear > interest. Since then, the authors have done their homework, including > the removal of suggested values. Let us now share the question with the > whole WG: do you think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good > foundation for a PCE WG item? > Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case > of disagreement. > > Thanks, > > Jon & Julien > > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
Hi WG, Julien, Yes, Support the adoption of this important draft. Thanks, Rakesh On 2018-01-22, 10:05 AM, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" wrote: Hi all, Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear interest. Since then, the authors have done their homework, including the removal of suggested values. Let us now share the question with the whole WG: do you think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good foundation for a PCE WG item? Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case of disagreement. Thanks, Jon & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
Yes/support as co-author. Thanks, Jay On 1/22/18, 10:05 AM, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" wrote: Hi all, Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear interest. Since then, the authors have done their homework, including the removal of suggested values. Let us now share the question with the whole WG: do you think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good foundation for a PCE WG item? Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case of disagreement. Thanks, Jon & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
In full support of this draft. Al Goddard Principal Member of Technical Staff AT&T Labs - Packet Optical Network 732.420.0286 - Q This email and any files transmitted with it are AT&T property, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this email is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 10:05 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request Hi all, Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear interest. Since then, the authors have done their homework, including the removal of suggested values. Let us now share the question with the whole WG: do you think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good foundation for a PCE WG item? Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case of disagreement. Thanks, Jon & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_pce&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=dBQU2WlitK5DqmLybyoy9w&m=cKwryO0JMLt1UsAy5gDfD6h7-ANldaIS3QNXLSW2GB8&s=ClAokRODdQ1DvYBKm8IqaeHAzxQa9Apwx9V2VgBUDfI&e= ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
I am in full support of the changes and in full support of this draft. I would like to thank all of the supports that we are getting for this draft. A. Raghuram Global IP/MPLS Backbone Design & Development 732-420-2471 ar2...@att.com This communication may contain information that is privileged, or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please note FYI that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Anyone who receives this message in error should notify the sender immediately by telephone or by return e-mail and delete it from his or her computer. -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 10:05 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request Hi all, Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear interest. Since then, the authors have done their homework, including the removal of suggested values. Let us now share the question with the whole WG: do you think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good foundation for a PCE WG item? Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case of disagreement. Thanks, Jon & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_pce&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=QNToJ4byfiy_4vy6H7dTgAPqN3XciMGI3LRm7GcpRS0&m=wURoF-Mabq0cYy4wiuHB-gJPa-hn0pwXy-zOIZx0f4w&s=FOvyqqUP6xJ8bucKyLF2AImz9XRU-jTSkRGwHJ2TX5s&e= ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
Hi All, As a developer of PCEP/PCE in ONOS controller, where in especially in the multi-instance, multi-cluster environment of ONOS, a particular instance act as a master for few devices(PCC) and wish to take control of LSP's from PCC. So i strongly support this for WG adaption. Regards, Satish. On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 8:35 PM, Julien Meuric wrote: > Hi all, > > Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear > interest. Since then, the authors have done their homework, including > the removal of suggested values. Let us now share the question with the > whole WG: do you think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good > foundation for a PCE WG item? > Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case > of disagreement. > > Thanks, > > Jon & Julien > > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
Support WG Adoption! Regards, Dhruv (as a co-author) > -Original Message- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric > Sent: 22 January 2018 20:35 > To: pce@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request > > Hi all, > > Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear interest. > Since then, the authors have done their homework, including the removal of > suggested values. Let us now share the question with the whole WG: do you > think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good foundation for a PCE > WG item? > Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case > of disagreement. > > Thanks, > > Jon & Julien > > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
Hi all, Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear interest. Since then, the authors have done their homework, including the removal of suggested values. Let us now share the question with the whole WG: do you think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good foundation for a PCE WG item? Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case of disagreement. Thanks, Jon & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
