RE: Tricky shot - need advice
You Are going to use the Pentax 67 to do this, of course! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 1:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tricky shot - need advice - Original Message - From: "Patrick Genovese" Subject: Tricky shot - need advice > > Hi, > > I need advice on how to go about taking a rather tricky shot. > > The subject is the inside of a church dome with an exquisite pattern on the > inside. > > Here are some problems/challenges that I face. > > The place is huge (approx 50 meters from the church floor to the dome's > apex). > > The interior lighting is very problematic, a mxture ot tungsten and > flourescent ligting of various types. > > I Want the shot to be symmetrical to enphasise the symmetry of the pattern. > The problem with this is that there is a big silver chandelier hanging from > a chain presicely in the center. To work around this I have arranged to > do the shoot when the chandelier is removed for cleaning in preparation for > the village feast. > > I need to use slow film to permit a decent enlargement. > > Natural lighting is somewhat uneven. > > My flash setup is one AF500FTZ plus I can borrow 2 METZ CT60s > > I was thinking of a bulb exposure in total darkness and using multiple > flash bursts to illuminate the interior. > > Suggestions please! This shoot will happen between now and August 6, the > next chance for a re-shoot will be next year so I'd like to get it right > first time! I would use a couple of 500 watt yard lights to illuminate the dome, and an 80A filter to correct the colour. your exposure times will be fairly long with this sort of setup, but at least you will be able to see the effect of the lighting. William Robb Remember, the LX Gallery is coming up. Please see: http://pug.komkon.org/LX_Gallery/LX_Submit.html for more information. Submission deadline is June 30, 2001 - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: OT: Graphics Pad?
I use a Wacom on a pc - works fine. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Scott Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 5:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: Graphics Pad? >Hi, all. > >I've decided to get a graphics pad for my PC for use >with Photoshop, etc. > >I wonder if anyone has any strong feelings regarding >make and/or model? > >Thanks, John > > >= >John Edwin Mason >Charlottesville, Virginia >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Alt Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi John, I was using a Calcomp Drawing Slate II (6x9) for several years and currently use a Wacom Intuos (6x8). The Calcomp is still going strong on my old machine (loaned out to a family member). Both brands were/are super for my use in graphics. I'm a Mac user, though, don't know if that makes a difference. Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: Pentax Spotmeter V
What is a Zone VI modified meter? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 4:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pentax Spotmeter V - Original Message - From: "Paul Ewins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: June 19, 2001 2:21 AM Subject: Re: Pentax Spotmeter V > The Zone VI modified meters are a lot > more expensive, $250+ seems the norm. They are worth every tuppence, and more. William Robb Remember, the LX Gallery is coming up. Please see: http://pug.komkon.org/LX_Gallery/LX_Submit.html for more information. Submission deadline is June 30, 2001 - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: MZ-S Price Stabilization ???
As a former studio photographer (Hartford, CT and NYC) - I stopped buying high end stuff (Nikon and Blad) from the locals because they are too high, can't stock, and usually unable or unwilling to remedy their mistakes. Bot a ton of stuff from 47th st photo a hundred years ago and am now buying happily from B&H. BTW, I am buying used gear from B&H (lots of Pentax 67), and finding that when you disagree with them on the condition of the gear, they will negotiate or happily take it back for credit which appears very promptly on your credit card. One caveat - I strongly suspect what they call a "demo" piece is really just a cherry used item which they guarantee, but what the heck if the price is right. Anther comment - These Pentax 67 cameras are really a good deal. Well built, fun to use, and they produces some really sharp stuff. I shoot mostly outdoors. Still think I would want the Blads if I was doing studio stuff tho. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Brogden Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 7:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MZ-S Price Stabilization ??? On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote: > I've heard lots of complaints over the years on this list that it's > hard to find places that stock the good stuff from Pentax on the > shelves, where you can come in and look at it and shop. Well, > ordering mail-order is the best way to ensure that the situation gets > worse. Hear, hear! I second everything that Aaron said. It's a vicious circle. Local stores aren't as likely to carry the more expensive stuff because very few people buy it, and those who do often use mail-order instead. If local stores see that they can actually sell upper-end items, there's more reason for them to stock them as a matter of course, meaning that you get more fun stuff to play with when you browse there. Would I pay a premium for shopping locally? Definitely, because of the many, many advantages. And if the local shop is *way* more expensive, then try talking to them. Explain the situation, show them what other places are selling the item for, and see if there's some way they can meet you in the middle, or at least give you a good deal on some other stuff. Believe me, they're not getting rich selling you cameras. There's a ridiculously low mark-up on cameras, and most local stores can only survive because of their photofinishing. chris - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: What makes a Pentax user?
Succinctly said! Thank you sir. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: What makes a Pentax user? Chuck Riccardo wrote: > At first I thought of replacing my Nikon F2 system with something more modern. > Either the Nikon F5 or maybe a Minolta Maxxum 7. It never occurred to me to > buy a Pentax 35mm. What would be the advantage of the Pentax over the Nikon > or Minolta systems? Chuck, We talk about this probably once a year. We are also a bit paranoiac about seeming to be a lesser quality brand than Nikon or Canon. 1) I'd say we are proud of the quality of our glass and the broad lens compatibility since the K-mount bayonet was introduced in the '70's. The glass is quality and nearly every lens works on nearly every camera...makes a pretty broad system. 2) The equipment is a good value. We seem to be a price conscious group and Pentax equipment offers high quality but not at an outrageous price. Many of us feel that the equipment is as good as Nikon, Canon, or Minolta, but we are not paying for advertising hype or strangely exotic lenses which we won't be using. Furthermore, most of us are using older, pre-autofocus gear...but you could be doing that with Nikon, Canon, or Minolta too. Regards, Bob S. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE: What makes a Pentax user? Why are they different?
Ah, so Pentax users are different? What makes them different? I can see that they know what they want, and are very good at articulating it. I will go look at a Pentax 35mm. I can tell you this for sure, while I am enjoying my Pentax 67 system, and I tolerate its bulk and mass on photographic outings, I also long for a secondary system to just have for casual use. Smaller and lighter sure sounds good to me, and if that applies to the MZ and LX I will go look at them. Thanks Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arnold Stark Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 1:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: What makes a Pentax user? Chuck Riccardo schrieb: > At first I thought of replacing my Nikon F2 system with something more modern. > Either the Nikon F5 or maybe a Minolta Maxxum 7. It never occurred to me to > buy a Pentax 35mm. What would be the advantage of the Pentax over the Nikon or > Minolta systems? Pentax cameras are smaller. What sense does it make for a 35mm camera like the Nikon F5 to be as big, as heavy, and as expensive as a medium format camera? The best Pentax camera is the professional LX with its near perfect metering system. If ever you use it you may easily become addicted. The solid and compact MZ-S seems to be very well-made, too, and it has a concept that none of the competition offers. A lot of Pentax lenses are really good. Most Pentax primes and some zooms are sharp, offer the best coatings, and very beautiful bokeh. K, M, A*, F*, FA*, and Limited series lenses offer very good mechanics, too. Compare a cheap (most Pentax lenses are cheaper, too) used SMC Pentax-M 1:1.4 50mm lens to the N. or M. equivalents, and you will know. Finally: Pentax is different, and so are its users. Arnold - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
RE:Any Pentax 67 users out there?
My name is Chuck Riccardo - As I am nearing retirement age, I thought I would get into medium format cameras and travel a bit with them. I would love to hear from some of you that use this format, but all I seem to see on this newsgroup are things called MZ and the like, which I assume are 35mm cameras. Am I on the wrong newsgroup? Are there 67 users out there? -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark CassinoSent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 10:24 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Filters for the SMCP-F Fisheye Zoom 17mm-28mm f/3.5-4.5True - my statement was a bit sweeping... you could also hold a 77mm up to it without any problem.-MCCAt 12:46 AM 6/10/01 +0200, you wrote: Well you can tape filters in place :-)Actually on closer inspection what looks like filter threads aren't... Pål - Original Message - From: Mark Cassino To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 12:04 AMSubject: Re: Filters for the SMCP-F Fisheye Zoom 17mm-28mm f/3.5-4.5You can't use filters at all with the 17-28mm fisheye zoom. the front has a little build in hood and no facility to attach a filter, there is no rear filter holder either. It's still a fun lens.- MCCAt 03:13 PM 6/9/01 -0600, you wrote: I was just wondering about the SMCP-F Fisheye Zoom 17mm-28mm f/3.5-4.5 and if there is filters that are made for this lens. I am pretty sure that it has no internel filters but perhaps small filters to attach to the back maybe? If any one who owns this lens or who is familiar with it can get back to me I would appreciate the extra information. - - - - - - - - - -Mark CassinoKalamazoo, MI[EMAIL PROTECTED]- - - - - - - - - - Photos:http://www.markcassino.com- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mark Cassino Kalamazoo, MI [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - - - - - - - - - Photos: http://www.markcassino.com- - - - - - - - - -
RE:Filters for Pentax 67 55-100 Zoom lens
Does this lens require a "thin" filter or will a standard work even down to 55mm? - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
