Re: Help needed in Chicago
I'd start with Central Camera in Chicago, www.central-camera.com. They have a repair department and i've had success with them in the past. There is also a shop I use for CLA's which is much closer to my home, TC Camera Repair in Lisle, IL, but I'm not sure if they do video repair work or not. HTH John - Original Message - From: "Gianfranco Irlanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 5:38 PM Subject: OT: Help needed in Chicago > Hi guys and gals, > > I guess we have on or more Chicagoans in the PDML (I hope so, at > least - who wrote about "Shoveling in Chicago"?) > A dear friend of mine, Alessandro, is spending a period of study > at the university hospital (sort of...) of Chicago. He left > Naples with his photo gear (Canon... :-( ) and a JVC MiniDV > camcorder we won at a short movie on-line contest (the movie is > Smack, I guess somebody recall that I annoyed all the PDML > members asking for their vote...). > The bad news are that the audio of the JVC is not working; since > Alessandro doesn't know where to repair the camcorder (which, of > course, has no US warranty) I thought to ask to our members in > the windy city if they know how to help him. > Thanks in advance. > > Gianfranco > > > = > > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! > http://platinum.yahoo.com > > >
Re: ZX-50 and Manual Focus 80-200 Lense
- Original Message - From: "Nagaraj, Ramesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 11:27 PM Subject: RE: ZX-50 and Manual Focus 80-200 Lense > ... > >>a better lense if the user is a beginner. Also, what about the ZX-50 body > >>itself. Is it also inferior? You appear to be a straight shooter so I would > > I used ZX-50, sorry to say i was not happy with it's metering. It uses 2-segment metering. > Then I changed to ZX-5n and I am very happy with ZX-5n metering. Zx-5n uses 6-segment metering. > I think metering is the heart of system so needs to accurate. The problem with the ZX-50 is it cannot use a *lens* that does not have a A setting. Older manual focus lens without the A setting on the aperture ring do not couple with the ZX-50 or ZZ-30's exposure system in program mode. Thus when it takes a picture, the lens is always set fully open I believe. If the ZX-50 supports aperture priority, I think these older lenses wil work in aperture priority mode. However, they will not meter correctly in program or shutter priorty modes. John
Re: Boz's photo on eBay auction
Hi Boz, I was actually going to send in a complaint, but when i click on the link, it said a complaint on this auction has already been filedso it appears someone beat me to it! It's just annoying to see folks use other people's work for thier own.profit. John - Original Message - From: "Bojidar Dimitrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:20 AM Subject: Re: Boz's photo on eBay auction > Hello John, > > John Glover wrote: > > > > In case anyone wants to gripe to ebay about this. > > > > http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=GetRNSWeb > > FormShow&flag1=0&flag2=3&flag3=6&rcode=52010383100&subjecttier1 > > =Questionable+Content+on+eBay&subjecttier2=Potentially+Infringing+I > > ssues+%28including+counterfeits+&Query=Use+of+images%2C+text+or+lin > > ks+without+proper+permission > > Thank you very much for the link! I will not do anything this time for > one because the action is over, and also because this is a "cheap" > item. But by the next bigger abuse I will definitely send in a > complaint, and hopefully eBay will react appropriately... > > Best wishes, > Boz > > -- > _\\|//_ Imagination is more important than knowledge... >0(` O-O ')0 A. Einstein > ===ooO=(_)=Ooo=== > Bojidar D. Dimitrov author and editor, Pentax K-Mount web page > [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://kmp.BDimitrov.de/ > = ><__> <__> > > >
Re: Boz's photo on eBay auction
In case anyone wants to gripe to ebay about this. http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=GetRNSWebFormShow&; flag1=0&flag2=3&flag3=6&rcode=52010383100&subjecttier1=Questionable+Cont ent+on+eBay&subjecttier2=Potentially+Infringing+Issues+%28including+counterf eits+&Query=Use+of+images%2C+text+or+links+without+proper+permission - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 6:12 AM Subject: Re: Boz's photo on eBay auction > A real dope, he couldn't even bother to steal the right picture! > (Shows Boz's 35mm f2, but notes he is selling a 50mm f2. > Regards, Bob S. > > In a message dated 10/25/02 1:22:07 AM Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > << Here we go again... at least they kept the copyright symbol. > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1391556972>> > >
Re: Pentax flashes
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:37 PM Subject: Re: Pentax flashes > It's mentioned in the description for the 201 that it's a good flash to use with the ZX-M. If what I've found out is correct, it's a good flash IF your lenses are KA. If not, then it's check the flash range and set the aperture. Ray, Pentax makes a flash that will meet your needs, the AF200T. It is very small, quite poweful for its size, has two auto modes, a TTL mode and a full manual mode plus adjustable power levels. You can pick one up from www.keh.com, or off eBay much cheaper.I paid $25 for mine off eBay a few years ago. I've since replace it with the AF280T, which came from KEH for only $49. > > I'm disappointed with Pentax. I've spent too much time trying to find basic info online. Their flash model designations are confusing (e.g., AF means auto-flash, not auto-focus) and their instruction manuals and product descriptions are next to useless. No more confusing than anyone else's flash designation. The Suffixes are the keys to Pentax flashes, F being digitial flash, T being TTL, Z being zoom head, etc. What does the E in Canon's designation mean, or the EZ or the EX? > > I like my Pentax cameras up to a point. I'm reaching that point and instead of changing all of my lenses over to KA to take advantage of a low-priced flash, I think it's time to sink money into the Canon EOS system. At least info on EOS isn't as obscure as what Pentax semi-translates from Japanese. And there doesn't seem to be any great confusion in regards to EOS flashes and their compatibilities with various EOS cameras. Nope, that's because EOS flashes will only work with EOS cameras. Try to mount an EOS flash on an A-1 and see what happens..nothihg as the EOS flash will not even talk to older manual bodies. At least Pentax still makes a few flash guns which are compatible with their entire range of cameras. John
Re: 28-105/4-5.6 IF
Hi Joe, I bought mine form a local camera shop, used but in like new condition for $200. That seems to be about the going rate for an excellent condition specimen. You may it cheaper on eBay if you are patient. John - Original Message - From: "Joe Wilensky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 11:17 AM Subject: Re: 28-105/4-5.6 IF > How much can I expect to pay for the 28-105 powerzoom model used? > (And does anyone have one for sale or trade?) It looks like B&H still > has the powerzoom model new -- for $357. > > Adorama has the new f/3.2-4.5 version for $200. The second (Tamron > rebadge) version is listed (new) at $210 at B&H and $190 at Adorama. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
OT Oopsie! Re: Poster recevied
Guess I need to check the retunr address before replyingsorry!! - Original Message - From: "John Glover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 7:57 PM Subject: Poster recevied > Hi Stan, > > I received my poster a couple of days ago, everything was just fine. Thanks > for coordinating this! > > John > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: This might be of interest to eBay users
Odd, I've used Paypal for three years and never had any problems. And now that eBay has bought out Paypal, I imagine it is going to become the preferred means of paying on eBay. John - Original Message - From: "Steve Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 7:44 AM Subject: Re: This might be of interest to eBay users > I`m glad I never used Paypal! Now I now why a lot of ebay > sellers will not use it. > Steve Larson > Redondo Beach, California > - Original Message - > From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:11 PM > Subject: This might be of interest to eBay users > > > > I submit this with no comment. > > http://paypalsucks.com/ > > William Robb > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Why I'm leaving pentax (and why you will follow)
And you know, the advanced "acronymic design" makes this even *more* desirable. So tell me, what acronym do you think of.. :) John - Original Message - From: "steven gilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 1:56 PM Subject: OT: Why I'm leaving pentax (and why you will follow) > Couldn't resist: > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1372383054 > > Steven. > > -- > __ > Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com > http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: RE: 70-2x0 zoom question
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 1:23 PM Subject: Re: RE: 70-2x0 zoom question > Thanks for the help Bill. To confirm and clarify (a phrase learned at my previous job with a Fortune 100 company), I have found these two lenses on eBay and Adorama. Are these the "-- an F 70-210/4-5.6 (discontinued around 1991, considered by many to be the best of the autofocus zooms in this range)" of which you speak? > > eBay: PENTAX TAKUMAR-F 70-210mm 4-5.6 AF ZOOM LENS > Adorama: Pentax 70-210 4/5.6 Takumar-f Af Lns The Takumar lens is an entirely different animal than the F70-210/4-5.6. It is a consumer level optic and not well regarded at all. Make sure you get the Pentax SMC-F 70-210the Takumar-F series of lenses were a budget series, skimping on both quality of construction and lacking SMC coatings. John - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: A certain retailer
Actually, though Keppler didn't call them by name, he wrote a scathing editorial about a an advertiser they were actually going to ban from POP Photo for bait and switch, inflated return charges and just generally being rude to their customers. About a month after or so that editorial, Cambridge's ads dissappeared from POP, and they had advertised in POP for *ages*.So, putting two and two together.. But then again, this is just all *circumstantial * :) - Original Message - From: "Jim & Jackie Meeks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 1:18 PM Subject: RE: A certain retailer > A while back I was looking to buy a Minox GT-E and did an internet search. > AAA and Cambridge came up with cheaper prices than anyone. When I called to > inquire about the camera, both were sold out and had questionable stories > about when another shipment would come in. I got weird vibes from both > companies and decided to look elsewhere and pay more. I also remembered them > advertising in all the camera magazines and I couldn't find an add for > either store in the current issues of POP Photo or Shutterbug. That probably > says a lot for their reputation. > > Jim > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: A certain retailer
Cambridge is the bottom feeder of bait and switch NYC scam retailersavoid them like the plague! Also, AAA Camera, which is also owned by Cambridge. John - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:32 PM Subject: A certain retailer > Hey gang - > > Has anyone had dealings with Cambridge Camera in NYC? I just had a > bait-and-switch scenario with them. I didn't fall for it. > > Has anyone else had this happen with this outfit? They don't seem reputable > to me. > > -Brendan MacRae > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Digital Queston On Another Camera Brand
- Original Message - From: "Bruce Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 5:45 PM Subject: OT: Digital Queston On Another Camera Brand > Hi All > > The Digital 2000 uses a removable SmartMedia card, and came with a 2Mb card > (as do the others). Since the manual was missing, I called Digital Dream > and asked what size cards can it take. They informed me that it only takes > 2Mb cards. > > Does anyone know why the camera is limited to 2MB cards, and why it should > not be able to save to bigger ones? My understanding is this is programmed into the firmware which runs the camera's on-board processors. For example, my Fuji 6900 can only see SM cards up to 128Mb now, which is the max size. If and when the 256Mb cards get released, I'll not be able to use them as my camera is limited by its on-board board software. Some cameras do have upgradeable firmware and can get around this limitation. With this camera, as it sounds quite entry level to only suppliy a 2Mb card, there is probalby no upgrade or way around this limit, if it truly exists. Have you tried borrowing say an 8 or 16Mb card and popping in the camera to see if it works? John - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Do you ever buy from E-bay?
Hi Julia, eBay is a great source for gear, but you do need to exercise some caution, as many of the other posts have related to you. Watch out on K1000's though. Although you can sometimes get a terrific deal, many times I see the price bid up to ridiculously high numbers. It seems some folks just lose their common sense when it comes to bidding on eBay, and the K1000 many times sells for more than it is really worth. The best thing to do is to use www.keh.com as a reference for the price you are willing to pay. I've bought and sold most all my gear on either eBay or through KEH. So far, I've been lucky (though I like to think of it as being a wise consumer!) on eBay and have not been burned. The same with KEH, I've had great luck with them, and everything I've bought has been in "BGN" condition. No complaints about KEH or the quality of their gear at all. John - Original Message - From: "J. Gerace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 6:10 PM Subject: Do you ever buy from E-bay? > Hi Everyone, > > Really enjoying the conversations here. Just reading a lot right now. > Butyou all got me thinking about buying lenses and stuff, so I've > been checking out E-Bay. There's a couple of K1000 packages that come > with a few lenses (that seem nice to me) and a SP1000 with a few as > well. Would it be reasonable to try for one of these? Probably the K's, > because of the lens mount...plus, then I'll have a spare body. > > I was wondering too if you all wind up bidding against eachother? : ) > Oh, and I saw an LX body for sale too.. > > Thanks, > > Julia > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Used flashes- good or bad?
Hi Taka, I've bought several items in "bargain" condition from KEw and to tell the truth, they have looked absolutely perfect in almost all respects. My AF280T showed only signs of paint wear on the Pentax logo, probably more from being slid in and out of a camera bag than from any misuse. I also purchased a bargain F70-210 and a Tokina 100/3.5 macro. if I were grading them, I'd have called them mint-neither lens had *any* visible problems with the glass and just the slightest flaws on the finish of the barrels. KEH seems to be quite conservative in their grading and I'd not hesitate to buy bargain grade form them. I've had terrific luck. A Bragin item from KEH is truly a real bargain! plus, if you are not satisfied, they've got a very good return policy as well, so buy with confidence from them. John - Original Message - From: "TM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 8:26 AM Subject: RE: Used flashes- good or bad? > John- > How bad/ugly is stuff in bargain condition? > > I hesitate to buy anything used that is described as such. > > Taka > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Uhhhhh...crack smoker?
Hi Paul, I did the same and received a similiar note. It just sounds as if this guy just did not know Pentax. As you said, seems a nice guy, just misinformed by someone. He also rasied a question to me about whether Pentax ever made a body with six pins for the flash contacts. He has been given a flash, supposedly Pentax Z series compatible, but it has six pins on the shoe. My PZ-1p has 4 contacts, the AF500FTZ has four pins, as I've never seen a n AF360FGZ, I'd assume it has at least one more to account for the additional features, but a six flash contact body? I tentatively told him no Pentax body I was aware of has six flash contacts. John > Folks: FYI > > Wrote a note to this gentlemen, and tried to be friendly, regarding questions > on this issue and a brief, to the best of my knowledge, note about the caps, > K mounts and availability. > > He did reply, friendly, and indicated that he had received two other messages > on the same topic. He indicates, and I haven't checked yet, that he has > changed his auction notice to reflect the new information. > > Seems to be a nice guy, just more familiar with other brands and was making > the same assumption with Pentax. WE may have a "convert" here as a result. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Flash Delima-Please Help
I think you can get a new AF280T from B&H for about $150, but that would not include the wide and tele adapters. John - Original Message - From: "Steve Pearson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:04 PM Subject: Re: Flash Delima-Please Help > Thanks for the input. Maybe I need a difuser for the > AF200T that I have? > > Is a used AF280T with both the wide angle & the tele > adaptors for $150 a good price? It appears to be in > excellent condition with cases & manual. > > Thanks for any suggestions! > > > --- Steve Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > The AF200T is a great little flash, but don`t > > expect it to cover > > a lot of range. The AF280T is substantially more > > powerful, > > will have a lot more reach, plus it tilts and > > swivels, has adapters > > for wide and tele, the wide adapter is always used > > on mine when > > shooting people, it`s kind of like a diffuser. Don`t > > rule out the > > AF400T, all you need to use it on a Super P is a "4P > > Sync Cord B", > > check them out on Boz`s page at: > > http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/ > > The AF400T also has the wide and tele adapters, can > > be used > > with an external battery pack, and it is quite > > powerful. > > Steve Larson > > Redondo Beach, California > > - Original Message - > > From: "Steve Pearson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:52 PM > > Subject: Flash Delima-Please Help > > > > > > > I currently own a Super Program & have a Pentax > > AF200 > > > flash & a Vivitar 283 flash. I primarily use the > > 283 > > > for "Professional" jobs, with a Lumiquest bounce > > card. > > > It seems that lately the pictures are a bit > > > overexposed. I'm giving some thought to buying a > > > Pentax AF280T. Can anyone tell me what to expect. > > > > > Will the 280 provide a noticeable difference? Can > > I > > > expect better results due to TTL? I have not been > > > real happy with the 200, but maybe it's just too > > > under-powered? > > > > > > Your help is greatly appreciated. I definately > > need > > > help learning about flash photogragphy. Any > > reference > > > out there on the web? > > > > > > Thanks in advance for any help! > > > Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage > > > http://sports.yahoo.com/ > > > - > > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. > > To unsubscribe, > > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the > > directions. Don't forget to > > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at > > http://pug.komkon.org . > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. > > To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. > > Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at > > http://pug.komkon.org . > Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards® > http://movies.yahoo.com/ > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: OT ? Genesis Camera Opinions ?
Stay away from Genesis.the only mail order sources that I'd trust would be B&H or Adorama. KEH is also good as well and have decent prices on excellent quality used gear. Some folks have had good luck with Genesis and some of the other low ball NYC camera house but in general you are more apt to get burned by these guys than save anything. And above all NEVER EVER EVER buy from Cambridge Camera Exchange or AAA Camera. These guys are listed in the dictionary under the definition of weasels and scumbags! - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:38 AM Subject: OT ? Genesis Camera Opinions ? > Hi everyone, > > I'm new to the list, and I've got a question that has absolutely nothing to do with Pentax, except that I may order some Pentax Lenses from the Online retailer Genesis Camera (http://www.genesiscamera.com). > > I'm up in Canada, and their shipping is outrageous ($125.00 US) but I'm still tempted because their gray market prices are very good. > > Has anyone ever ordered from them or had any experience with them ? > > Muchly appreciated, > Dave > > > mail2web - Check your email from the web at > http://mail2web.com/ . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: OT: Hilarious shill bidding on eBay
Canon announced $2199 as the MSRP for the D60. - Original Message - From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 7:25 PM Subject: Re: OT: Hilarious shill bidding on eBay > The suggested retail is supposed to be slightly lower than the D30 was. > > Ciao, > Graywolf > http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto > > > > - Original Message - > From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:26 PM > Subject: Re: OT: Hilarious shill bidding on eBay > > > > What the hell is that all about? > > > > Out of curiosity, anyone know what those things are worth? I'm guessing > not > > $85,000US... > > > > -frank > > > > Chris Brogden wrote: > > > > > My friend told me about this auction for a Canon D60, currently at about > > > $70,000 US. Check out the bid history! :) > > > > > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1338871855 > > > > > > chris > > > - > > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > > > -- > > "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The > pessimist > > fears it is true." -J. Robert > > Oppenheimer > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: More image theft...
I like this one...BTW, for those interested, eBay does have a policy regarding image theft and unauthorized linkage of your image to another's auction. If Boz complains, eBay should stop this guy from using the link.. But Stan's idea has a lot more merit to it I think. You;d think a camera dealer could at least manage one image of his product! - Original Message - From: "Stan Halpin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:59 PM Subject: Re: More image theft... > A direct comment would be to put up a jpeg of text to the effect of > something like: > "The seller in this auction was too lazy or incompetent to take a picture of > the item he is selling. So he linked to one of my pictures without > permission. Would you buy a used camera from this man?" - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
OT:FS: AF200T, AF330FTZ
Since I've recently purchased an AF500FTZ, I've got both my AF200T and my AF330FTZ for sale now as I doubt I need four flashes. The AF200T is in EX+ condition while I'd guess the AF330FTZ to be in LN-. The original case is included with both as well as a photocopy of the instruction manuals (if I can find the AF200T manualit may be in my desk at work). AF200T $45 plus shipping AF330FTZ$85 plus shipping. Please contact me off list if interested. Thanks! John Glover [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: AF280T and M lenses
No, as the Super Program supports TTL (the only K mount body to do so), you can use all the modes of the AF280T. On all other K mount bodies, you can use both the manual and automatic modes, but not the TTL. The AF280T is probably the most versatile flash you can have for a non-AF body. I love mine and use it on both my MX and ZX-M, as well as on my Fuji digital body, all in the automatic modes. Now, I'm waiting in anticipation for my AF500FTZ to arrive, courtesy of a list member..thanks Bill!! - Original Message - From: "David Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 5:22 PM Subject: AF280T and M lenses > I now have the above mentioned flash and a > M50mm f 1.7 on my newly aquired Super > Program.If i understand the flash manual,i > would only be able to use the flash in manula > mode and no auto modes??Is this correct. > > Dave > > > Pentax User > Stouffville Ontario Canada > > Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: How to unsubscribe?
See the note at the end of every message you have recieved from this, including the one you posted and this oneonly you can unsubscribe yourself - Original Message - From: "fsylee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 7:30 PM Subject: How to unsubscribe? > Hi > > How to unsubscribe from [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Please advise. > == > ·s®öSMSµu°T¡Ghttp://sms.sina.com.hk > µ¹»·¤è¿Ë¤Í¶Ç¤WµLÅå³ß > 50MB ¹q¤l¶l¥ó ¡Ghttp://sinamail.sina.com.hk > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Tamron 70-210 zoom - does adaptall 2 adapt to OUR cameras?
Minolta MD mount... - Original Message - From: "Ann Sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 10:14 AM Subject: Re: Tamron 70-210 zoom - does adaptall 2 adapt to OUR cameras? > The adapter that is on there now is a M-MD (finally looked at with a > magnifier to > see that.) No clue what camera that is for. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
OT: Verify@eBay.com fraud
Anyone who receives an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] asking to re-veirify your eBay info due to installations of new servers, just be warned this is a scamI emailed the domain owner of www.ebay-verify.com, and was promptly emailed back that this is a scam. The account had been fraudulently registered and was being used to collect password and credit card data. The domain owner has had site is shut down now, but if anyone you know inadvertently sent out their credit card info to this site, then they need to have those cards cancelled immediately. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: CCD sensor array from Foveon
Based on the Sigma SA-9 body... http://www.dpreview.com/news/0202/02021104sigmads9.asp - Original Message - From: "Peifer, William [OCDUS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:31 AM Subject: CCD sensor array from Foveon > Hi folks, > > Here's some information from NASA Tech Briefs Insider > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on the new Foveon color CCD sensor array, > plus a link to additional details, for those who are interested. > > Bill Peifer > Rochester, NY > > === > > COMPANIES TO WATCH > Dr. Carver Mead, a pioneer of the modern computer chip industry, has > developed > a new Silicon Valley company called Foveon, which will begin shipping a new > type of digital image sensor that can match the photographic capabilities > of 35-mm film. > > The company's sensor chip is being used in a single-lens reflex camera made > in Japan, and a second generation of the sensor is scheduled for shipment > this fall. If purchased by other camera makers, it could be available early > next year in popular brands of digital cameras. Eastman Kodak has inquired > about using the Foveon sensor in one part of its product line. > > Current digital sensors capture light via a mosaic of red, green, and > blue filters that limit information to one color per pixel on the surface of > the sensor. Foveon's X3 sensor captures color by measuring how deeply > photons > of light penetrate the surface of the imaging material. This method provides > a higher resolution from a given number of pixels. > > The new technology also enables integration of high-resolution still > photography with full-motion video. A video camera using the technology > could > record an event, and midway through recording, the user could depress a > shutter button, capture a high-resolution photograph, and seamlessly > continue > recording video. > > Visit http://link.abpi.net/l.php?20020214A5 for more information. > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Am I Really a Dinosaur?
- Original Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Why can't digital cameras shoot in B&W? > The Fuji 6900z has a black and white mode, but most folks I know prefer to shoot in color then desaturate the image in Photoshop. I think the real trick is being able to print out a decent black and white print from an inkjet printer. Lyson makes quad toned black/gray inks to use in place of the colored inks but from what I have read it is a real hassle to use...you almost need one printer dedicated to black and white printing due to the laborious (and expensive) cleaning process you have to go through in between switching from mono to color and vice versa. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: comparing FA 28-70/4 and Tokina 28-70/2.8 AF
Hi Nick, I've owned both and the Tokina is a better overall lens in terms of sharpness and contrast, but not by much. As Bruce said, it is a pro level lens and delivers outstanding image quality. The down side is it is big and heavy when compared to the 28-70/4. I found myself using my 28-70/4 much more, just due to this fact. I never found the extra stop loss to be that much of a hindrance and the 28-70/4 made my Pz-1p seem a heck of a lot lighter! And yes, in Pentax AF mount, the Tokina is fully compatible with the PZ-1p. - Original Message - From: "Nick Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:52 PM Subject: Re: comparing FA 28-70/4 and Tokina 28-70/2.8 AF > Thanks for the reply, one other question though... Is > it fully compatible with a camera like the pz1p? > Thanks again! > > Nick > > --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nick, > > > > I have the current ATX 28-70 2.6-2.8 lens and I can > > tell you that it > > is good. The build quality is better than the > > Pentax and image > > sharpness is as good or better. Remember that this > > is a pro grade > > zoom. The one big area where the Pentax is clearly > > superior is in > > flare control. The Tokina has to be watched because > > flare can catch > > you quite easily. > > > > Whether the extra stop is worth it or not is your > > call. If you find > > that the viewfinder is too dim, you are not able to > > get the shots you > > want because of speed or are having to use faster > > films that you want > > to, then any of these would probably make the extra > > stop worth it. > > > > If, on the other hand, light weight and size or > > great flare control > > are more important, then the Pentax is the better > > choice. I chose the > > Tokina due to needing/wanting the extra stop and the > > Pentax 28-70/2.8 > > has many negative reviews concerning build quality > > and the price is > > outrageous. > > > > > > Bruce Dayton > Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! > http://greetings.yahoo.com > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Pentax Macro setup recommendation
- Original Message - From: "Albert Fekson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:08 PM Subject: Pentax Macro setup recommendation > 2. Bearable (Damned Compromise): FA-100 f/3.5 Macro with close-up filters > for 1:1, although this lens gets good optical scores from photodo.com, I am > not sure if it is the best for manual focusing. Also, its only 1:2 and can't > use Nikon's close-up lenses. I've got the Tokina version of this lens (I think), or at least I have a Tokina 100/3.5 macro so I imagine it is a rebadge of the Cosina/Vivitar lens. It is a pretty decent lens, manual focusing is ok, but not the greatest. Build quality is about what you;d expect for the price. I found this one on KEH, as someone else had recommended, for $65 I believe. > PZ-1p just for macro use. Should I be looking for a used lens, and if so > where can I find one in Chicago? It seems that there's very little used > Pentax gear around here. You're right about Chicago but if you look, you can sometimes find good bargains in Pentax. I got a mint MX at PJ's Photo in Glen Ellyn a couple of years ago for just under $100 and also found a EX FA28-105/4-5.6 at Helix Camera in Lombard. So it is out there but there is just not too much. Your best bet for used Pentax gear will most likely be Central Camera downtown on S. Wabash, or Helix's main store downtown at Jackson and Racine. PJ's in Glen Ellyn (on Roosevelt Rd) rarely has any used Pentax, Helix in Lombard (Yorktown Mall) does have some, but their pricing strikes me as being quite expensive for used equipment. Outside of those stores, it is hard to find used Pentax gear around here. But if you just keep looking, sometimes you find a nice buy! John - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: MV batteries
Thanks Tom, I couldn't remember the specs off hand.. - Original Message - From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 10:00 PM Subject: Re: MV batteries > Which probably means an S76, 357, etc. > > Ciao, > Graywolf > > > > - Original Message - > From: John Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 10:25 PM > Subject: Re: MV batteries > > > > Same as the ME I'd guess, as the MV is basically a striped down version of > the ME. At one time I owned an MG, which I believe is the model in between > the MV and ME and it was a pretty decent little camera. > > > > John > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:44 PM > > Subject: MV batteries > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Just got an MV today that I bought on eBay. It has no batteries in it - > > > which is why it was so cheap ($20 with an m 2.0 50mm). As I said > > > before, I really got it for the lens, to put on my "new" MX. The MV > > > body is a bonus. > > > > > > Anyone out there know which batteries go into it? > > > > > > thanks, > > > frank > > > > > > -- > > > "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The > > > pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert > > > Oppenheimer > > > - > > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: MV batteries
Same as the ME I'd guess, as the MV is basically a striped down version of the ME. At one time I owned an MG, which I believe is the model in between the MV and ME and it was a pretty decent little camera. John - Original Message - From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:44 PM Subject: MV batteries > Hi, > > Just got an MV today that I bought on eBay. It has no batteries in it - > which is why it was so cheap ($20 with an m 2.0 50mm). As I said > before, I really got it for the lens, to put on my "new" MX. The MV > body is a bonus. > > Anyone out there know which batteries go into it? > > thanks, > frank > > -- > "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The > pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert > Oppenheimer > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: OT:I Need More Speed
I think the original speed restriction on the telephone lines were set into law many years ago, maybe as far back as the 1940's. So, at that time, 53K data transmission speeds seemed impossibleand we have just never seen fit to review and revise the law. - Original Message - From: "Leon Altoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:49 AM Subject: Re: OT:I Need More Speed > So the US is full of sub-standard equipment? Or is it a ploy to sell > more ISDN lines? If you or any other technical person knows the reason > please let me know why 56k modems are limited by law to 53k in the US. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Film at airports, again
We have had similar issues where I work, and I work for the US Government (Env. Protection Agency). Many of field personnel who do site inspections and clean ups are issued radiation film badges a s a part of our safety policies. Several of our on-scene coordinators have been *forced* by airport security to pass their film badges through the x-ray machines, and have refused to hand inspect the items. This, in effect, fogs the badge and results in a reading that makes the individuals appears to have been exposed to a radiation source. Thus we have to go through the hassle of documenting each exposure and explaining to the NRC it is not a radiation exposure, but bone-headed stubbornness on the part of the FAA. In fact, my Radiation Safety Officer is preparing to write to FAA on just this matterand to turn over the paper work on documenting the "exposures" to the FAA so they can address the issue for each incident we have. It is absolutely ridiculous that the FAA will not follow its own set of rules and regulations pertaining to hand checking of items, but hopefully if we threaten them with a vast amount of paperwork, they will get the word. FWIW, the Federal Protective Service, who provide security at federal buildings, has been very good about working with others agencies to ensure sensitive items do not have to be x-rayed. It seems FAA is just not wanting to get on board with current practical policies and is just "following orders" to x-ray everything. - Original Message - From: "Otis Wright, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 6:31 AM Subject: Re: Film at airports, again > We going to get reasonal solutions to a lot of air travel challenges until DOT > and FAA are overhauled -- in my opinion, they servce the carriers not the > customers acceptance of the new security requirements notwithstanding. These > knee jerk, low tech reactions to the new security requirements are not going to > foster much of a recovery for the industry -- in my opinion. It takes time to > catch up, but I see no indication they know where the goal posts are located. > > We have reduced our air travel to only that which is just not optional. > > Otis Wright > > Richard Seaman wrote: > > > Joe, > > > > I also just came back from 3 weeks overseas, carrying 75 rolls of film. > > Like you I requested hand inspection, and at O'Hare and Houston (twice) they > > grudgingly granted it. > > > > To make life easy, I always carry the film in a large clear plastic > > ziplock bag without plastic canisters, so the film is readily visible. They > > swabbed it for explosives, also, but the whole bag rather than individual > > films. > > > > I must say that I got very angry about the rudeness of the security > > staff, I really felt that I was being treated like a criminal rather than a > > customer. I believe it is possible to be professional without being > > obnoxious. > > > > Both at O'Hare and Houston I was told that the x-ray machines "wouldn't > > affect" film under ASA1000; at Houston I lied and said I had some 1600 film > > mixed in with the 400 and 800 which was actually in the bag. I'm thinking > > of buying 4 rolls of cheap 1600 film to carry with me in future so I'll have > > more leverage with these people. I was also told in Houston that from Feb > > 20 or thereabouts the FAA was mandating that all film go through the > > scanner. I don't know if this is true or not, but you heard it here first. > > > > Richard. > > > > home phone: (1)(847) 244 5463 > > home page: www.richard-seaman.com > > > > --- original message --- > > > > I'm just back from three weeks overseas. Departing Albuquerque airport > > on January 13, I asked for a hand inspection of my film, as I usually do > > at U.S. airports. Result: they opened and wiped every cannister, then > > tested each wipe on the sniffing machine (the one they use for portable > > computers). Then they also made me remove my shoes, and wiped and tested > > those. As each wipe takes a few seconds, this is time consuming for the > > quantity of film I had with me. > > > > Guess I won't ask for hand inspection anymore. > > > > Joe > > > > _ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.kom
Re: Old lenses
If you grind them up and eat a few, it may be an issue.. - Original Message - From: "Alan Abbott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:33 AM Subject: Old lenses > I have been following the threads about rare earth elements in old lenses > with interest. > I does concern me that there 'may' be a health problem with them. I love my > Tak lenses but... > What do people think? Is this one of those things that you have more chance > of winning the lottery or is it a real concern? > How many lenses were/are affected? > does anyone know of serial ranges? > Alan > > > > This e-mail and any attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended >recipient, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message >from your system. Do not copy this e-mail or any attachments, use the contents for >any purpose, or disclose the contents to any other person: to do so could be a breach >of confidence. > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: No Pentax digital SLR at PMA=3 F (WAS: Cool colors: blue, purple...)
Same here Bob, I spent about the same on a Fuji 6900, which is again a 3MP camera. I'd love to have a decent, sub-$1000 digital SLR body, CCD or CMOS, doesn't really matter. Canon showed it can be done with CMOS and done well. Hopefully, Pentax may get the idea...:) John - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 4:37 PM Subject: RE: No Pentax digital SLR at PMA=3 F (WAS: Cool colors: blue, purple...) > gfen wrote: > > I'd LOVE to have a CHEAP digital body that > > accepted my lenses. It wouldn't have to be > > anything special, just to knock around with, > > like all the other digital P&S cameras out there. > > > > I can't imagine I'm the only one with these > > ideas, as well. > > ME TOO. Just laid out $700 for a Sony 3.1 Mpixel. > Why can't I use my Pentax lenses? > > Bob S. > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Pre-PMA?
Don't forget, Nikon uses interpolation in the D1x as well, I believe it is in the vertical plane, to boost their resolution numbers. They leave the horizontal resolution alone though. I always find it amusing when people gripe about the Fuji CCD interpolation, then compare it against a "real" camera that does not like the D1x. :) Fuji does have a lot of noise in their second generation CCD, especially at ISO400. It is quite good at ISO 100 and well controlled at ISO 200, but at 400, especially with long exposures, the noise is pretty bad. Fuji claims in their third generation Super CCD, they've fixed that with new algorithms. Time will tell I suppose... Too bad that Pentax didn't work with Fuji on the new SLR body though. The Fuji images are *very* nice from the Super CCD cameras. I'd be ecstatic if there was a new Fuji digital SLR with a K-AF mount! John - Original Message - From: "Len Paris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 4:29 PM Subject: Re: Pre-PMA? > Fuji uses a lot of interpolation (read that as creating pixels > based on the pixels around them) I'm interested in reading the > full specs and seeing the hands-on reviews when the camera is > actually available to be tested. APS sized CCDs or, CMOS in the > case of the EOS D30, are not that big of a problem in my > opinion. To me, the most important factor is noise. The D30 is > perfectly usable at ISO 1600. Others get pretty noisy at or > above ISO 320. > > Len > --- > > > > > So, fuji is making releases pre-pma on their new DSLR: > > > > http://www.dpreview.com/news/0201/02013003fujifilms2pro.asp > > > > Those must be damn small pixels! C'mon pentax, give us some > news! > > > > Personally, I hope that Pentax makes something with a chip > that's at least > > this big. 1.6x is kinda crazy (a la D30) IMHO. > > > > -Ryan Brooks > http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=172402 > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: New Pro Fuji
I own a Fuji 6900z, which uses the second generation Super CCD. The 6900z had a standard 3.1Mp CCD and give an interpolated image of just a bit over 6 Mp. However, I tend not to shoot in the 6Mp mode as for most of my shots, there is no real advantage in quality that I can see. I rarely make anything beyond an 8x10, so the 3Mp resolution is generally enough. The advantage I see to using the 6Mp mode comes in when you need to crop and enlarge a photo in Photoshop. I use Genuine Fractals and I've found the 6 Mp mode give GF plenty of data to work with when setting up a cropped and enlarged shot. Beyond that, there is not much advantage to 6Mp...unless you want to brag about your megapixels!! Actually, most reviewers equate the resolution in the 6Mp mode to be equivalent to about 4 to 4.5 Mp in qualityso you guessttimataion of 8 Mp effective resolution is probably about on the mark. John PS -- One really nice thing I've found with Fuji's Super CCD is the colors are pretty darned good.most photos need very littlle color correction work and many times are very good straight out of the camera. That's nice if you want to print off a couple of quick shots from your media card at the local digital kiosk. - Original Message - From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:26 AM Subject: RE: New Pro Fuji > pixels). The file size is around 12 million pixels (definition 2). I > would say that whilst the real resolution of SuperCCd is exaggerated, > you do get around 1.4x more usable information, so I would expect the S2 > to come in at just under 8 megapixels. > > Even if you ignore the whole Super CCD controversy, a 6 million pixel > SLR for £2700 is pretty interesting. Kinda makes the MZ-d(V2) seem > outta date already dont it? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rob Brigham > > Sent: 30 January 2002 11:11 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: New Pro Fuji > > > > > > Fuji are still using APS sized CCDs. We will see about Contax... > > > > Interesting that the S2Pro has "6.17 million effective pixels > > delivers a > > massive 12 million pixel image". Presumably this means that it is an > > effective, effective 12MegaPixel camera! I wonder what the real pixel > > count is? Just like marketing to quote 12Million by interpolating the > > interpolation. In theory they could just as easily quote an infinite > > mega pixel count by including genuine fractals! > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 30 January 2002 05:14 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: New Pro Fuji > > > > > > > > > Big news--Fuji have introduced a 6.17 megapixel "Super CCD > > > III" camera based > > > on the Nikon N80 that allegedly offers real improvements in > > > sensitivity to > > > the equivalent of ISO 1600 with little noise. Check it out: > > > > > > http://www.dpreview.com/news/0201/02013003fujifilms2pro.asp > > > > > > --Mike > > > > > > > > > "Photography is simple. The only complicated thing is keeping > > > it simple." > > > (Ken Archer) > > > > > > * * * > > > Find out about Mike Johnston's unique photography newsletter, > > > "The 37th > > > Frame," at http://www.37thframe.com. > > > - > > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Some e-marketing thoughts
I always feel if you want to set a reserve on an item, then use that as your opening bid. Granted, if the price is set too high, you will get no bids, but then I suppose that means you are overvaluing the item, based upon what the current market will bear. I'll sometimes bid on an item with a reserve price if it really interests me, but it is not an auction I'll typically follow closely, for the reasons you cite. - Original Message - From: "Ken Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:51 AM Subject: Re: Some e-marketing thoughts > I, for one, usually don't bid on Reserve Auctions. That is an oxymoron > to me. In an auction, the seller puts an item up for bid and a > competition between bidders sets the price. It seems to me that you > are bidding against the seller in a Reserve Auction and really have no > idea if you will get the item or just waste your time. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Vivitar Series 1 28-105, Sigma 35-85, vs. new Tokina 28-105
A really nice new lens on your budget would be the Tamron 28-105/4-5.6 or the Tokina 28-105. Both are terrific values for the money. The Tamron is nice and light and a really decent performer.generally around $150 or so new (I paid $158 for mine). The Tokina is heavier and a better build, and a bit closer to the $200 mark I think, but an excellent lens. Both of these are autofocus lens, ideal for the ZX-5n. I've heard nothing but bad things about the Sigma 28-105/2.8-4...not real sharp, poor contrast, not a very highly rated lens. The Vivitar has been rated both as generally pretty good, or generally pretty lousy..depends on whose review you look at! The FA28-70/4 is outstanding! It is a bit slow but if you go with the new 800 speed films, you just might be alright. A really good lens in the 28-70/2.8 category is a used Tokina, but these are probably a bit over your budget...they seem to list and sell for around $235 or so in good condition. John - Original Message - From: "Debra Wilborn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 4:11 PM Subject: Vivitar Series 1 28-105, Sigma 35-85, vs. new Tokina 28-105 > I'm looking for a relatively fast zoom lens to start > on a Pentax ZX-5n. Budget is a consideration, around > $150 new or used. I was looking at used lenses and > saw two that looked interesting: the Vivitar series 1 > 28-105 f2.8-3.8 and Sigma 35-85 f2.8-4. > > Can someone tell me a little more about these lenses? > Are they autofocus, or at least auto-aperature? I've > read that the Vivitar is a varifocal design. Is this > true of the Sigma as well? Is varifocal a pain or an > improvement in image quality? > > Somewhere I read that the Vivitar has a minimum focus > distance of almost 5 feet. That's a little too far > out there. Does anyone know or can guess as to the > minimun focus of the Sigma? I can't find any specs on > it. > > As far as new lenses go, I was looking at the Sigma > 28-105 f2.8-4 and maybe the Tokina 28-70 f3.5-4.5 or > 28-105 in the same focal length. The Tokina isn't > very fast, but I've been wondering about it, too. > Some think very highly of Tokina lenses and I'd like > to know how they stack up against the others. > > I know someone will recommend the Pentax 28-70 f4; > however, I think it will be a bit too slow. I would > like to shoot in existing light in concert halls and > do some night photography around town. > > Thanks for the help, > Deb > Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! > http://auctions.yahoo.com > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: FA 28-105 mm f/4-5.6
Not exactly side by side, but I did own the Tamron lens, which was the same without the SMC and electronics. It was a good lens, but I found the performance of the Pentax PZ to be a bit better, more contrast and better color. That may have been due to the SMC coatings, but overall, I was happier with the old PZ version. however, the Tamron is a very nice and compact lens, as well as quite light when compared to the Pentax PZ lens. - Original Message - From: "Ayash Kanto Mukherjee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 12:23 AM Subject: Re: FA 28-105 mm f/4-5.6 > Hallo John! > > Thanks for your views. > I still have a small question, if you don't mind. The one with IF has 15 > elements in 12 groups while the one with power zoom has 13 elements with > 11 groups. Don't you think that the IF one could have closer optical > performance to its power zoom counterpart if not equal? > Have you compared the two lenses side by side? Just inquisitive. > I apologise beforehand if I am disturbing you. > > With regards, > Ayash. > > On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, John Glover wrote: > > > No question, the old power zoom is a much better lens. > > One of the best in its class. > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Ayash Kanto Mukherjee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 10:15 PM > > Subject: FA 28-105 mm f/4-5.6 > > > > > > > Hallo all! > > > > > > According to Boz's K-mount page, PENTAX produces two FA lenses in the > > > range 28-105mm f/4-5.6 > > > > > > One has power zoom option and the other one has IF (Internal Focussing). > > > Boz has also stated that the one with IF is possibly fabricated by Tamron > > > wth genuine PENTAX electroncs and SMC coating. > > > > > > How does the optical performance of the one with IF compares with the one > > > with Power Zoom? > > > > > > Inquisitive. > > > - Ayash. > > > - > > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: This List Should Have Warning Labels...
- Original Message - From: "Marc Schlotthauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 10:01 PM Subject: This List Should Have Warning Labels... > Geez... > A week or two after joining the list, I took the plunge and bought a PZ-1p > with a handy-dandy 28-70 f/4 zoom, and have been obsessing mightily. Yeah, but you can always show your wife how much money you have saved her by getting the PZ-1p/FA28-70/4 combojust show her how much something similar from Canon or Nikon would have cost! :) Great set up by the way, that's mine as well, plus I added the old FA28-105/4-5.6 power zoom model for those times when I need more reach..oh yeah, then there was the Tokina 19-35mm...and then the MX and an A50/1.4. and a 100/3.5 macroand...LOL Welcome! - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: FA 28-105 mm f/4-5.6
No question, the old power zoom is a much better lens. One of the best in its class. - Original Message - From: "Ayash Kanto Mukherjee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 10:15 PM Subject: FA 28-105 mm f/4-5.6 > Hallo all! > > According to Boz's K-mount page, PENTAX produces two FA lenses in the > range 28-105mm f/4-5.6 > > One has power zoom option and the other one has IF (Internal Focussing). > Boz has also stated that the one with IF is possibly fabricated by Tamron > wth genuine PENTAX electroncs and SMC coating. > > How does the optical performance of the one with IF compares with the one > with Power Zoom? > > Inquisitive. > - Ayash. > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: for the collectors
It's not just your post, but there are generally several posts with eBay links (and they are not specific to PDML, but other lists as well) that have no clue as to what they lead to. It would be nice to at least have a brief description of the item, since someone went to all the trouble to post it, I'd like to know what it was before I delete. However, as I often read my messages off-line, I am not in the position to click on every blind link that comes along. - Original Message - From: "Christian Skofteland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 5:06 PM Subject: Re: for the collectors > well, actually, yes if they are interested in a collector's item. Just as > someone earlier today sent a url for an auction of a giant Spotmatic which > generated a butt-load of messages all day long (which i deleted in bulk). - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: for the collectors
I agree with this.generally I never even check these out if there is no description, for this very reason. often I read off-line and do not have the ability to get online, so the link just goes into the deleted item file. At least give a description of what it is, then if I'm interested, I can always make the point to check it out next time I am online. - Original Message - From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:34 PM Subject: Re: for the collectors > > http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1325207033 > > Christian, do you really want everyone who is a member of the PDML > to log on to the net and then download that URL just to see if it > has something of interest to him/her? > > Fred > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Pentax A 70-210/4 or Tokina AT-X 80-200/2.8???
For sports work, I'd go for the extra stop of speed and get the Tokina. I've not used the 80-200/2.8 but have used the 28-70/2.8 and it was an excellent lens. John - Original Message - From: "Nick Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:58 PM Subject: Pentax A 70-210/4 or Tokina AT-X 80-200/2.8??? > Which of these two lenses would be the better choice? > I am a photojournalist at a daily paper and shoot lots > of sports. The Pentax f4 is selling at KEH for about > $150 (Exc Plus), and the AT-X at KEH for about $200 > (bargain cond). > > Nick > > = > Nick Wright > Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! > http://auctions.yahoo.com > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Flash for ZX-M ?
Hi Debra, If you want a good Pentax flash, look around for an AF280T. It is TTL compatible, but it also has two autoflash ranges, bounce and swivel. I picked one up from KEH for $50 used, they tend to go on eBay for around $75-100. New, the AF280T is about a $160 or so. Another good buy at around the $70 price point is either a Vivitar 283 or a Sunpak 383 Super. These are new prices for the Vivitar and Sunpak units. The 283 has been a pro workhorse flash for years, and the 383 is basically Sunpak's copy of Vivitar's successful flash. If you do not need the bounce or swivel, the Pentax AF200T is another excellent flash, again TTL compatible but with two auto ranges plus a variable power manual mode. These often sell for about $30-50 and it is a terrific little flash. I own both the 280 and 200 and they work well on the ZX-M. Plus if you ever decide to upgrade to a TTL compatible body, you will not need a new flash. I've used both these flashes on my MX, ZX-M and PZ-1p and they work flawlessly. My favorite on the ZX-M is the AF200T though, mainly for the size of it. Unless you really need bounce capability, this works well on that body. As far as second curtain sync goes, the ZX-M does not support this feature, IIRC. Enjoy! John - Original Message - From: "Debra Wilborn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:53 PM Subject: Flash for ZX-M ? > I've been told that the camera does not use TTL > metering, so the flash will need its own sensor. > Low-light photography interests me, so I would like to > find something that does second-curtain sync. Unless > of course the camera does not support second-curtain > sync. Then it wouldn't matter. What does matter is > price. I'm looking to spend less than $100, or better > yet, less than $70 and have no problem with used > equipment if it works. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Rikenon 50mm matchup?
Your Rikenon lens has the Ricoh P mount, which is not compatible with the K-A mount. While it will fit, as it is a standard K-mount, the electrical contacts are placed where Ricoh wants them to function with Ricoh bodies, not where Pentax places them. The Ricoh-P and Pentax K-A are not compatible, electrically speaking Another note, on Pentax AF bodies, the Ricoh contacts will jam the AF mechanism and lock the lens on the camera, making it quite difficult to remove, so use caution f you ever get a Pentax AF bodies with Ricoh-P lenses. John - Original Message - From: "Leonard & Peggy Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:27 PM Subject: Rikenon 50mm matchup? > I just switched to an MZ-M from my trusty K-1000 a few months ago and have > been VERY slow in reading the manual. Tonight I just got to the "automatic > aperture" adjustment on the lens. While my Ricoh Rikenon 50mm lens has no > "A" > setting on the aperture ring it does have a "P" which I assume is for > "Program". I set it to "P" but nothing happened, it is still acting like > I should be setting the aperture by hand. The camera is not responding to > this setting. > > I run a small repair shop and have to think lots of these things out I > figured there must be some electrical contact with the lens so the camera > would know when it is in "Automatic". Sure enough I found the little copper > contact button on the bottom of the lens. > > BUT... the little contact does in no way match up with the camera's contact > points... what gives? > > Did pentax move their contact points? While this is a K mount lens was it > made to work on some other camera? > > Please, talk slow! > > Leonard//Laredo > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Pentax FA 28-105
I agree, it looks like my 28-105 PZ lensand you would think the seller should know as the seller is Columbus Camera Group in Ohio..scares me if a camera store cannot recognize what model a standard zoom lens actually is. But then again, maybe they do not know what the price ought to be either! :) John - Original Message - From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 12:28 PM Subject: Re: Pentax FA 28-105 > It looks like the power zoom model. Seller probably just doesn't know. > Ask for a photo of the other side to see if the pz switch is there. Good > price - grab it. > > Joe > > P.S. I've found that this lens balances nicely on the MZ-S. > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Mint MX on Ebay, low BIN
It depends on the camera store. With all the emphasis on the so-called professional brands :), I was able to pick up a near perfect MX in a local shop for a mere $113. I've often thought about putting it on eBay since I'm sure I could pay for it an then some, but I just cannot bear to part with it... John - Original Message - From: "wendy beard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:25 PM Subject: Re: Mint MX on Ebay, low BIN > Good grief, I wonder what I could get for my even-mintier-than-that one. > Especially as mint seems to mean "missing the winder cover and that little > black thing on the shutter lock". > Although having said that, $179 is cheaper than the going rate for an MX in > the used camera stores, if you can find one. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: PZ-1p and lens ordered
- Original Message - From: "Marc Schlotthauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:48 AM Subject: PZ-1p and lens ordered > I ordered my PZ-1p from B&H ($479.95), and ordered the 28-70/4 from KEH in >"Excellent" > condition for $109 - can't beat that. Excellent choice here..I've got both and while the 28-70/4 is an outstanding lens, it feels a tad light on the PZ-1p. You will be like me I imagine, and be purchasing a FA28-105/4-5.6 some time in the near future! :) > > This will be the first time I've owned an SLR without having a compatible 50mm > prime (which feels very strange), but I don't think the 50/1.4 will be far off Another great choice in 50mm lenses is the F 50mm/1.7. But the real beauty of the PZ-1p is you can use *any* K-mount 50mm lens on it. If you look around, M and A series 50mm are all over eBay, and can usually be gotten quite cheaply as most people look down on the 50mm lens these days John - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: 280T
Sorry about that Cory.but I've been looking for one of these for a long time, as well as a good BGN AF500FTZ for the same price! I'll be looking for that one for a long time I bet...:) John - Original Message - From: "C or B Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:12 PM Subject: Re: 280T > RRRG! That one was supposed to be MINE! - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: 280T
I picked one up from KEH about two weeks ago, BGN condition for $49. Overall in good shape but the Pentax logo across the front was a bit worn. Just adds character though as the flash works flawlessly. You'll love the AF280T. John - Original Message - From: "David Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:46 PM Subject: 280T > Going to look at a AF280T Wednesday after work, > I'm so exited.Now if i could only decide on a scanner > life would be good. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Self enabled
The third version, the f/2.8-4.0, is the one I have and it is quite good lens. It seems to be very under-rated too from what I've read on Bob Monahagn's website (http://people.smu.edu/rmonagha/third/cult.html#steve). I suppose that is because of the variable aperture perhaps. In any event, there is a good discussion of the Vivitar Series 1's lens and this web site gives a nice history of them.Anyone know where I SR1 200/3.0? :) John - Original Message - From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:36 PM Subject: Re: Self enabled > > While browsing one of our local camera shops today I came across the > > Vivitar Series 1 70-210/3.5 that's been on their website for several > > months. It so happened that the owner was available today and advised > > me he would sell it for $99.00 US. That was enough for me to do some > > self enabling, couldn't resist. > > Which version, Bill - the first-generation with the 67mm filter > threads, or the second-generation w/62mm (the version I used to use a > lot)? > > Fred > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Spotted on eBay
Probably the best way to do it, but I was using eBay's iPix service and it automatically uploads the pictures for you, so there was no URL for my pictures, they were tied to my auction. I was just trying to get everything listed by this weekend as I'm out of town next weekend and I wanted to get this wrapped up before I left. And yes, thanks for the publicity...the check is in the mail. I sent it via [EMAIL PROTECTED]:) John - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 8:18 AM Subject: Re: Spotted on eBay > > Probably best to put the url so at least it *looks* like you tried to upload > them. Hey, think of all the free publicity Cotty, Mark, and I have generated > for you. > > That'll be $20, please > > Kind regards from sunny Brighton > > Peter > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Spotted on eBay
That was my thought when I first bought this lens, shouldn't it be a variable aperture lens?The newer ones seem nicer in finish, especially the 28-80 AT-X, but this is a nicely speced lensoptical quality does not appear to be compromised in any version of this lens. I've been happy with the lens, but just do not seem to use it enough. I seem to favor my FA28-105 or the 28-70/4 over this lens. Plus, I want a new digital camera, so I've decided to try to get rid of some my 35mm gear I just no longer seem to useplus that way it also keeps peace with the wife toolook, I'm buying this digicam with proceeds from my 35mm gearLOL John - Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 5:30 PM Subject: Re: Spotted on eBay > "John Glover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >They do make this lens as I have it in front of me right now > > Doh! Never thought they might have made one in the past that isn't in the > current catalog. Felling dumb. > > >And I do have pictures:) > > > -- > Mark Roberts > www.robertstech.com > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Carbon black
Possibly yes, but copy toner is a mixture of carbon black (or some other pigment) plus usually a styrene-acrylic copolymer which is what is used by the fuser roll to heat set the image from a photocopy. So, while there is carbon black there, there is also other nasty polymeric compounds you'd probably not want to place on your glass. John - Original Message - From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 8:31 PM Subject: OT: Carbon black > Would this be carbon black (lamp black)? > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Interesting item on eBay web site item#1251500453: Pentax Super Program 35 mm Camera Outfit
Interesting, you'd think a pro photographer would at least have an AF200T (though the AF280T would be the more obvious choice I think) for his "pro" outfit. I mean, why both to get a Super Program, which has TTL flash, then cripple the capabilities by using a non-TTL flash unit on it. Plus, I find the use of the 135/2.5 Tak to be another interesting "pro" choice here. Also, isn't it clever who disengagedman also happens to have the rhstamps web site as a part of his description. It certainly does make one wonder how he just happened to "find" this item..or yeahhe's a "pro" Looks more like someone who spammed the photo newsgroups and mail lists to me. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 5:08 PM Subject: Interesting item on eBay web site item#1251500453: Pentax Super Program 35 mm Camera Outfit > I saw this item for sale at eBay, the world's largest personal trading community, >and thought that you might be interested. > > Title of item: Pentax Super Program 35 mm Camera Outfit > Seller: disengagedman > Starts: Jun-29-01 17:54:13 PDT > Ends: Jul-09-01 17:54:13 PDT > Price: Starts at $350.00 > To bid on the item, go to: >http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1251500453 > > > Item Description: > The Disengaged man is a professional photographer with a fine art studio in Buffalo, >NY area (Collins, NY 25 miles south) who has upgraded his equipment. > > - Pentax Super Program 35mm Camera Outfit (Rated #1 in >Consumers Reports) Shot only 15 rolls of film Ex++ >Condition > > - Pentax Super Program 35 mm SLR Body > - Pentax SMCP 35-105 f.3.5 Zoom Lens > - Pentax Motor Drive A ($500+ New) > - Pentax Takumar Bayonet Mt 135 f. 2.5 telephoto lens > - Pentax SA 200 Flash (dedicated to Super Program) > - Skylight Filter > > REFERENCES: See website www.rhstamps.com Look under resume. > > Visit eBay, the world's largest Personal Trading Community at http://www.ebay.com > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: What Do You Carry
500 kg, now that's a real MAN'S bag.. - Original Message - From: "Bob Walkden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 7:05 PM Subject: Re: What Do You Carry > attached to my camera bag is a small carabiner - 500kg > > inside the bag are: > > a Leitz table top tripod, > .. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: A 100/2.8 vs. FA 100/3.5 vs. Tamron SP 90/2.5
I just picked up a Tokina AF 100/3.5 macro from KEH. I'm assuming this is the same lens as the FA 100/3.5 minus the SMC coating. It goes only to 1:2 as KEH, naturally, did not have the life size adapter. Based upon the look and feel, I'm pretty sure this is the same Cosina made lens that the same as the Vivitar/Phoenix/Pentax 100/3.5. I was just never knew they made it for Tokina. A test roll shows it to be surprisingly sharp and with good contrast. However, I'm wondering if it too sharp to be a portrait lens. I do very little portraiture, mainly pictures of my son, but I'd assume most macro lens may be too sharp to portrait work, as they'd accentuate any blemishes to be a bit too noticeable. John - Original Message - From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 10:49 PM Subject: Re: A 100/2.8 vs. FA 100/3.5 vs. Tamron SP 90/2.5 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > A 100/2.8 > > FA 100/3.5 > > Tamron SP 90/2.5 (manual) > > > > Which one is optically the best for portrait photography? > > Don't know about the A 100/2.8, but the FA 100/3.5 is definitely better > than the tamron. The tamron is sharp, but a bit flarey. It's built > better though... > > tv > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: PUG Themes
I'd forgotten about the mudslidesanyone know of a really steep hill where I can
build my $2 million dream house??
John
("dream" being the key word there!)
- Original Message -
From: "Cy Galley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: PUG Themes
> Just show us pictures of the dust of an earthquake or the anguish of an
> owner watching his home in a mud slide down a hill, or the fire of one of
> the out of control brush fires. Maybe a tidal wave wiping out a Malibu home.
>
> HAR
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 6:08 PM
> Subject: Re: PUG Themes
>
>
> > The October 2002 gallery theme "Bad Weather" is exclusionary and unfair to
> > Southern California residents as we are seldom plummeted with hydro
> meteors,
> > blown by atmospheric vortexes or subject to other meteorological maladies
> > during this time of year.
> >
> > Har!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bob...
> >
> > Give blood. Play hockey.
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 1:58 PM
> > Subject: PUG Themes
> >
> >
> > > The recent bruahua regarding exclusionary gallery themes has
> > > caused me to take another look at the upcoming themes. Please
> > > have a look at:
> > > http://pug.komkon.org/general/themes.html
> > > for information regarding this page update.
> > > Thanks
> > > William Robb
> >
> >
> > -
> > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: PUG Themes
Well, I suppose you could stretch the interpretation to include earthquakeswe may have our fair share of atmospherics vortices here in the Midwest, but at least the land beneath our feet is solid! (or, it has been since the New Madrid incident of 1811) John - Original Message - From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 6:08 PM Subject: Re: PUG Themes > The October 2002 gallery theme "Bad Weather" is exclusionary and unfair to > Southern California residents as we are seldom plummeted with hydro meteors, > blown by atmospheric vortexes or subject to other meteorological maladies > during this time of year. > > Har! > > Regards, > Bob... > > Give blood. Play hockey. > > - Original Message - > From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 1:58 PM > Subject: PUG Themes > > > > The recent bruahua regarding exclusionary gallery themes has > > caused me to take another look at the upcoming themes. Please > > have a look at: > > http://pug.komkon.org/general/themes.html > > for information regarding this page update. > > Thanks > > William Robb > > > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: OT Re: LX Gallery
Ok, I know what vegemite is, as one of my friend's roommates in college was from Oz, but what is marmite? Marmoset paste?? LOL - Original Message - From: "David A. Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2000 10:11 PM Subject: Re: OT Re: LX Gallery > petit miam writes: > > > I think it should be Marmite vs Vegemite. BTW Vegemite > > is far superior. > > No bloody way. That stuff is disgusting. There's not much better than a > nuked cheese & marmite sandwich... - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Re: Telezoom
The Takumar F 70-210 zoom is NOT the same lens as the SMC-F 70-210..there are indeed two separate version, with the SMC-F being miles ahead of the Takumar F. The Takumar F's were basic, low budget entry level type AF lenses without the SMC coating if I recall correctly. John - Original Message - From: "K C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 10:00 PM Subject: Re: Re: Telezoom > oh no!!! > > this is killing me, I checked KEH and > it has the following lens: > Pentax 70-210 f/4.0-5.6 Takumar F Autofocus. > There are, indeed a bunch for less than $100. > > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: telezoom, part III
Are you sure this is the SMC-F 70-210, and not the Takumar-F version?I purchased my SMC-F from KEH about a year ago for $140 in BGN conditionlast time I checked, about a month ago, the SMC-F in BGN was going for $115. John - Original Message - From: "Bob Poe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:43 PM Subject: Re: telezoom, part III > WOW...just checked the KEH websight...these lenses in > excellent con. are selling for $80.!!! > --- K C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, I think I've settled on the following lens, > > thanks to everyone's insight and experience: > > > > Pentax F 70-210 f/4.0-5.6 (autofocus) > > > > It'll be my first (and probably only) telezoom. > > Unfortunately, I've been told it was discontinued > > some time ago, replaced with an FA 70-200, which > > leads me to my dumb question of the week > > (is anyone keeping count?) > > Where can I find one of these? (and what's > > a fair price?) > > > > thanks! > > > _ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > http://explorer.msn.com > > > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. > > To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. > > Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at > > http://pug.komkon.org . > > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: In Praise of my amazing new Pentax: The ME super!!!
I believe that little orange barred gizmo whirls around as you advance the film to let you know your film is actually moving onto the take up spoolkind of a built in insurance policy against mis-loaded film. I'm glad you like the ME Super, it is a great little. Like you, I've owned my share of Pentax cameras including both the MG and ME Super. I loved my ME Super as well but unfortunately the shutter died on me and the repair cost was almost as much as I could pick up a "new" one off of eBay... Damn, now I'm feeling enabled.. John - Original Message - From: "Sid Barras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 11:13 PM Subject: In Praise of my amazing new Pentax: The ME super!!! > > Just one thing. There's a little window on the back of the top plate > below the winder, with little black and orange bars in it. Whatzit? > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Ebay Auction...
But, if the buyer says they will post to the US only, then why are they advertising this auction of the eBay Australia site? Something seems wrong here with the shipping fee it seems to me. There is no reason at all to post an auction on the Australian eBay site, yet state you will only ship to the US John - Original Message - From: "John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 7:25 PM Subject: Re: Ebay Auction... > Cy Galley wrote: > > > > The ad specifically says "BUYER PAYS $8 SHPG/HDLG." I think you are the one > > that should send out a bad feedback. They are not meeting their end of the > > bargain. Write to ebay and ask for their advise. I understand that you are > > in Australia, but the increase should not be that much. They are trying to > > take advantage of you. > > If we go by what the initial offering said, don't forget that little > bit that mentioned "seller will ship to North America only". You can't > simply claim that they aren't honoring their end of the deal - their > deal explicitly excluded overseas deliveries. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: OT Rob's setiathome milestone, Yipeeee!!
I've got 90 units here as well, with 91 processing its little guts out as we speak. But, I've noticed my processor time seem much longer, almost 5400 hours for 90 units. But then again, I don't always send my work unit immediately after it has finished, so I'm wondering if the software is actually counting only the processing time or the actual time the work unit is in your PC. I've got a Pentium II 400Mhz, so it seems it should run faster than this. John - Original Message - From: "Treena Harp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 5:33 PM Subject: Re: OT Rob's setiathome milestone, Yip!! > Cool. We only started doing it recently and have processed less than 20 > units. And speaking of the search for life more intelligent than ourselves > (after all, that IS what we're doing), I'm in the process of acquiring press > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: eBay fun
Speaking of eBay fun, anyone been able to input a new item this evening? I'm trying to list an HP Photo cartridge and I CANNOT get past this damned screen wanting me to download eBay's picture hosting service. Even though I check no thank I do not want to install this software, the damned message keeps popping up, even though I have checked the box stating I do not use pictureshow does one get around this bull and on to the seller's pages?? This is becoming most annoying... John - Original Message - From: "Chris Brogden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 10:18 PM Subject: eBay fun > > Okay, people, count the mistakes, inaccuracies, and misleading bits in > this auction: > > http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1223185089 > > I counted at least seven big ones (not including spelling or grammar > errors, as these are understandable if English isn't their first > language... except for "Ashai," which is spelled correctly on the lens > *L*). This includes two innacurate statements in one 16-word > sentence. :) Have fun! > > chris > > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Phoenix AF Zoom 100-400 in Pentax mount
Not a very highly rated lens, especially at the long end, quite soft with low contrast. But, if you want one, B&H Photo, www.bhphotovideo, has one listed in this month's Popular Photography, brand new, for $199.95. The aperture is f/4.5-6.7, so it is on the slow side as well... Personally, I'd pass on this lens. For the same money, ($200 from B&h), you can get the Sigma 70-300/4-5.6 DL Super Macro, also brand new. This lens has got very good reviews and I believe some list members own it and are happy with the overall performance versus its price. Throw on a 1.4x teleconverter and you'll get to 420mm at f/8. I've used the Tamron 100-300/5-6.3 before and was generally pleased with the results there. That lens is currently selling at around $175, but has a $20 rebate from Tamron, so your net cost is about $155. John - Original Message - From: "Ernest Alejandria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 12:07 AM Subject: Phoenix AF Zoom 100-400 in Pentax mount > Spotted on ebay > http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1220737145 > > Phoenix 100-400 AF Zoom (max.& min. F-stop not given) with buy it now offer > of $265.00. Accordingly, the MSRP on this lens is $500.00+ as per seller. > > Is anybody on the list familiar with this brand and this particular model. > I'd be appreciative of any input from the group regarding it's qualities (or > lack thereof), performance, durability etc. > > I'm a newcomer to the list BTW. > > > Paulo > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: When does a 35-135 zoom have a 10:1 range?
Do they still charge $4 for bipedal manual? :) - Original Message - From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 9:32 PM Subject: Re: When does a 35-135 zoom have a 10:1 range? > Ken Archer wrote: > > > > I did and I'm still trying to figure out how to make it zoom ;-) > > It employs the advanced and complicated bipedal zoom mechanism. > > You may need to get a manual from Pentax. > > tv > > > > > On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, you wrote: > > > On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:12:27 -0600, Dan Scott wrote: > > > > > > >I saw a "50/1.7 Zoom Lens" yesterday. :-) > > > > > > Man, you should have grabbed that sucker! Talk about RARE! :-)) > > > > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: What do you shoot with 50mm? (was: FA 50mm f/1.4)
Except for the FA 28-70/4 AL, probably among the best of the 'standard' 28-70 out there..Also, the F 28-80 is also a good lens as well. I've never used the F 28-80 but do have the 28-70/4 and for the money, you'll not find a better lens in its class, IMHO. John - Original Message - From: "dosk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 9:37 PM Subject: Re: What do you shoot with 50mm? (was: FA 50mm f/1.4) > (And many of the now 'standard' size zooms, (in the 28-70 or 28-80 > category,) have terrible ratings. Especially the Pentax's, sorry to say...) > But there are good 3rd party standard range zooms available too. Just check > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: For Sale Tokina 80-400 AF Zoom Lens!
Proof coins are struck on specially polished and prepared dies, to give the coin the highest quality mirrored and frosted finish possible. They are never intended for circulation. A mint state coin is a perfect example of a production run coin. John - Original Message - From: "Chris Brogden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 2:59 AM Subject: Re: For Sale Tokina 80-400 AF Zoom Lens! > If you're talking about coin collecting, then even that has a grade above > mint called "proof." Proof is fresh from the mint, absolutely > perfect. This could easily be the effect that the seller was trying to - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: What you shootin' this weekend?
Going to try to track down a pair of bald eagles reported at a local forest preserve this weekend.I'll be using the 400/5.6 K along with the PZ-1p. John - Original Message - From: "PAUL STENQUIST" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 7:26 AM Subject: Re: What you shootin' this weekend? > Well, last night I noticed there were several hundred Mallards in the > marsh down the street. I'll probably see if I can sneak up on them with > an LX, a 400/5.6 K, monopod, and perhaps some Portra 800. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Pentax USA's communication with its dealers
I had a similar experience today as well...I stop by a very BIG camera sore in downtown Chicago to get a few small items and just out of curiosity asked to see a 24-90.they actually had 3 in stock...but when I asked about the MZ-S, all I got was a blank look. John BTWprices for the 24-90 here in Chicago is $549. - Original Message - From: "Dan Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 4:07 PM Subject: Pentax USA's communication with its dealers > Stopped by my local pentax dealer to pick up a part today. While paying, I > asked if they were going to stock the new body. That was the first they'd > heard of it. They even pulled out all their Pentax literature and checked. > > How does Pentax stay in business? > > Dan Scott > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: eBay madness
Well, you've got two guys with zero feedback in an apparent bidding war over who is going to get this, most likely "rare and minty" gem The seller will probably never see the money.. John - Original Message - From: "Todd Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 5:46 PM Subject: eBay madness > > Over $100 for an A 50mm F1.7 lens? > http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1216233420 > > Todd > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Pentax System, Is It Worth It? (Was RE: MZ-S Is It Worth It ! )
Although, if you go into Central Camera in downtown Chicago, the president of the store is always seen wearing his Pentax SF-1n pocket protector. Maybe that explains why they've been around for 102 years! John - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 11:32 PM Subject: Re: Pentax System, Is It Worth It? (Was RE: MZ-S Is It Worth It ! ) > In a message dated 2/26/01 9:55:52 PM Eastern Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > << I was visiting a local camera shop, and was talking with one of the > salepeople. He is a N afficionado, and since the store only handles the > ZX series, had no idea that the PZ-1p even existed. >> > > When visiting local "camera" shops (read: Nikon/Canon shops), I've discovered > PENTAXaphobia is a standard illness among store personnel and owners. > > Mafud > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: LX & Lens Motherlode
So, based on the proxy bid system, the reserve must have been $9,900, assuming the previous bid of $8,900 did not meet reserve. The proxy will take you up to your maximum bid, or the reserve as I understand - Original Message - From: "PAUL STENQUIST" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 8:25 PM Subject: Re: LX & Lens Motherlode > The winning bidder played it perfectly. He placed his only bid of the > auction with 21 seconds to go, and it was substantially over the > existing high bid. That's how you win ebay auctions. > Paul > > "Gary L. Murphy" wrote: > > > > Seems that the motherlode of LX and lens stuff went for, $9,900.00! > > > > Later, > > Gary > > > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: LX & Lens Motherlode
- Original Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 9:07 PM Subject: Re: LX & Lens Motherlode > A*135/1.8, and ~26.00~ for a K-mount body cap. It's nice to > have that kind of money. Yes Shel, but was it an *original* K-mount body cap? :) John - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Further on compacts
- Original Message - From: "Bucky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 7:25 PM Subject: Re: Further on compacts > > Second that. I got a Stylus Epic over Christmas, just so I can carry a > camera about at all times (even when it isn't convenient). I find that it's > OK, although getting the thing to lock on to the appropriate focus point > takes a little learning. And a spot meter! Try finding that on another > P&S! > That's another point I forget to mention, Epic does indeed have a spot meter...the original Stylus does not. But, either body makes a perfect carry camera, easy to stuff into a shirt pocket and still have decent glass to use w/o the SLR kit. Though, an MX with a 40 pancake...except pretty soon that rare 40 is gonna cost more than and FA 28-70/2.8 if eBay is any indication! :) - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Further on compacts
Pricewise though, the Olympus Stylus cameras are a real bargain, especially if you can find the older, original Stylus. While it has only a 35/3.5 lens, you are only losing about half a stop over the Stylus Epic (Mju II). I picked one up when the Stylus Epic was released because the local camera stores were almost giving away the original Stylus cameras. I think I found mine for $69, brand new, at one of the chain discount stores, while the new Stylus epic was going for about $125. However, the original Stylus is not weatherproofed like the new one, so if that is an issue, you should go with the Epic. But, either of these two cameras will take excellent pictures for a compact, rivaling SLR quality. I've also been able to get decent slides as well, provided the lighting is not tricky or contrasty. John - Original Message - From: "Ted Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 3:57 PM Subject: Re: Further on compacts > Jody wrote: > > > The Olympus mju is probably a good size, but is it a good camera? > > I sympathise with your problem. After much research I had whittled down my > list of possible compacts to the Olympus mju 11 and the Yashica T5, going > primarily on the basis of lens quality and weather-resistance. > > Today I went down to my local camera shops and played with both of them. I > came away with the T5. It felt better in my hands, for whatever that is > worth, and it has a better viewfinder than the mju. The mju's viewfinder > bends straight lines at the edge of the frame rather alarmingly, a problem > not to be found with the T5's finder. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Pentax System, Is It Worth It? (Was RE: MZ-S Is It Worth It !)
Hear hear! When I used to subscribe to the EOS list (over three years ago), people would get pissed off if you spelled out Nikon, Pentax, or any other camera branddammit, this is the Canon EOS list!! Isn't that a friendly list? LOL Personally, I think using the asterisks is a bit silly.everyone knows we all use different gear on this list, but most of us are primarily Pentax users. You use what you need to get the job down and if Canon or Nikon supplies something that one needs to do the job, then they will use it..there is no reason to not spell out what you are talking about. I think everyone on the list is secure enough to be able to handle seeing the word Canon, Nikon or Minolta spelled out. John - Original Message - From: "James Apilado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 5:47 PM Subject: Re: Pentax System, Is It Worth It? (Was RE: MZ-S Is It Worth It !) > Can we stop with the practice of not spelling out the names of the > competitors? Sure we like our Pentaxes from the early Asahi Pentax all the > way up to the soon to be seen by all MZ-S. The competitors are not C***n, > N***n, or M*a. Never heard of those cameras. I have heard about brands > named Canon, Nikon, Minolta, Olympus, Contax, Leica among others. > Long live Px. > > Jim A. > > > From: "Mark Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:57:30 -0800 > > To: "Pentax-Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Pentax System, Is It Worth It? (Was RE: MZ-S Is It Worth It !) > > > > I'm writing this from the perspective of someone who owns an LX, a ZX-5, and > > a bunch of FA* glass. The high-end Pentax lenses are definitely good. If > > you look at B&H New York prices, most Pentax lenses are comparable in price > > to C***n, N***n, and M*a lenses (there are a couple of exceptions, > > including the overpriced FA* 80-200 F2.8). Pentax low-end bodies are, I > > think, pretty comparable to C***n, N***n, and M*a bodies in features and > > price. > > > > When they are released, Pentax high-end bodies are comparable to those of > > the others, too. The LX rocked when it came out. Other contributors to the > > PDML have said that the PZ-1p is comparable to the N***n N90s and is a > > better deal (except for a couple of poor build-quality issues). > > > > The problem that I see is that the Pentax high-end body planning and release > > cycle is not well-run at all! How many of us would have been ecstatic to be > > able to buy a camera derived from the PZ-1p, but with updated auto focus, a > > real battery grip, and a vertical shutter release? As another example, the > > ZX-5n/MZ-3 used to compare well in spec to equivalent C***n and N***n > > products, but they are aging and noone is talking about replacements. > > > > Is it worth it to build a Pentax system? From an objective perspective, you > > can probably get better bodies and more good glass for less $$$ if you go > > with N***n or something. > > > > I built a Pentax collection partly because I started out with a P-3n and a > > couple of lenses back in the 1980's, and partly because I like to be a > > little different. I'll probably buy an MZ-S when they become available. > > For me, it is worth it to build a Pentax system. My gear makes me happy. I > > like taking pictures with it. It is cool to be able to put a 30 year-old > > screw-mount lens on a brand-new body and be able to take a picture. > > > > --Mark > > > > http://www.westerickson.net/mark/mark.html > > > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > > > > > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Pentax filters
B&H Photo in New York sells Pentax SMC filters now, through their web page. They did not used to have them listed on the web, but only in recent weeks have I seen them available. Pentax has two lines of filters, standard single coated filters, usually sold in blister packs with a lens hood, and the SMC line. Not every Pentax filter you get will be SMC. And yes, the size range is limited to that listed below. John - Original Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 12:11 PM Subject: Re: Pentax filters > Yes, there are SMC Pentax filters. They are not available in > all sizes - 49mm, 52mm, 58mm, 67mm, and 77mm only, if I > recall, IAC, just sizes for Pentax lenses. They are > available in UV, Sky, and a few B&W contrast colors, plus pol. > > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: MZ-S Is It Worth It !
There's an interesting comparison in the Feb 2001 issues of Practical Photography, where they review entry level SLRs. They compare the Canon EOS 3000, Minolta Dynax 404Si and the Pentax MZ-30 cameras. Out of the three reviewed, all get 7 out of 10 except the MZ-30, which scores an 8 out of 10. However, when it comes time to make the recommendation on which camera is the best overall, they give the Minolta the edge, based on the number of features it has. Now, a camera at this level, the user, at least in my opinion, is probably not going to use anything but programmed AE.they will probably never shoot in Av or any other mode. However, they do say that for the price, ease of use, performance and build quality, the Pentax more than makes up for the lack of features and is the ideal beginner's camera. Odd how they could select the Minolta as the winner..it does make you wonder about the reviews. John - Original Message - From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 11:19 AM Subject: Re: MZ-S Is It Worth It ! > > Look at the new Canon 30 or 33, fantastic reviews in which they could > > hardly fault the camera. > > Where are you seeing these reviews? Most camera mags *never* give bad > reviews. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: My bargain of the day (and it wasn't on eBay!)
I've had a couple of Pentax filters I purchased from KEH end up being the SMC filters, though most are generally the standard coated ones. I've also gotten one B&W MC filter that was advertised as a single coated filter, a 58mm 81B. KEH has had some decent prices on B&W filters recently I've noticed. Generally about $12 for EX to EX+ condition for the KR 1.5's. I was also able to snag a Heliopan 77mm KR 1.5 for $19. The copy stand is an excellent deal. I like the idea of the BIN feature, but now it has increased my eBay browsing time to add a check of the newly listed items! John - Original Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 10:32 PM Subject: Re: My bargain of the day (and it wasn't on eBay!) > John Glover wrote: > > > > I had something similar ... > > I ordered, along with a couple > > other items and it turned out to > > be a 77mm SMC Skylight.quite > > the bargain for $17.00! > > That is a good deal! I paid about twice that, maybe a bit more, > for a new one from a shop up in Canada, eh. > > I recently got a pretty good deal, too. Snagged a Pentax > Copystand II on eBay using BIN for $150.00. The stand's in LN > condition with all the accessories. The B&H price is about > $1250.00. > > > -- > Shel Belinkoff > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > There are no rules for good photographs, > there are only good photographs. > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: My bargain of the day (and it wasn't on eBay!)
I had something similar, though it was through KEH. I was shopping for a 77mm filter for my 19-35 Tokina, and happened to see a 77mm Pentax Skylight, listed in EX+ for $17, I believe. So, I ordered, along with a couple other items and it turned out to be a 77mm SMC Skylight.quite the bargain for $17.00! John - Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 4:49 AM Subject: My bargain of the day (and it wasn't on eBay!) > I was at a local camera shop today, looking through the bargain > bin of odds and ends they always have out. I've never found > anything I wanted...well, not until today. There was a perfect > Tiffen FL-B filter in 72mm size for $10.00. The big coincidence > is that I was about to buy this filter because *tomorrow* I'm > shooting some photos in store that's buying some advertising on > my web page! > 72mm is exactly the size I wanted, too, because it's the largest > size of any of my lenses and, when used with a filter step-up > ring, it works nicely on my 20mm and 24mm lenses without > vignetting. > > And I didn't even have to snipe bid for it ;) > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Camera Bag......
Has anyone every heard of the J-803? I saw an eBay auction calling it the J series Domke satchel, yet it was no where to be found on either Domke's web page nor B&H. The lister *claimed* it was shown at PMA LAST year, but Domke had not got around to releasing any info about it It sounds kinda fishy to mesame dimensions as the F-803. http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1215280721 John - Original Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 7:53 PM Subject: Re: Camera Bag.. > Has anyone used the Domke f-805? > > http://www.saundersphoto.com/html/body_f805.htm > -- > Shel Belinkoff > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Camera Bag......
I've also got the F-802 as well.Shel's right, with the padded inserts you can configure this bag to carry quite a lot. Another useful bag in the Tamrac back pack, I believe it is the Expedition 3. You can 2 bodies and three or four lenses in this as well. - Original Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 5:14 PM Subject: Re: Camera Bag.. > Check out a Domke source here: > > http://www.fargo-ent.com/domke/domke7.htm > > and here: http://www.saundersphoto.com/html/domkest.htm > > I have the F-803 and the F-802 > -- > Shel Belinkoff > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Camera Bag......
Domke F-2 will easily carry a PZ-1p and a ZX-M, plus four to six lenses and an AF330FTZif you want to go a bit smaller, the F-6 bag will carry the two bodies and four lenses. John - Original Message - From: "dosk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 4:44 PM Subject: Camera Bag.. > Can anyone recommend a good camera bag that would be large enough (and small > enough) to carry, let's say, a PZ and a ZX body, along with 4 lenses? (I'm > leaving myself some room for future expansion here...) > Something less than $100?? > > All responses appreciated. > Dosk > > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Fair price on SMC-A 50/1.4?
I'd agree here..keep the lens and sell them on eBay if you feel the need to let them go. I think the 50/1.7 would bring a better price. I traded an SMC-M 50/1.4 for an SMC-A 50/1.4 and they gave me about $30 I think in trade.though I did not complain as they had mispriced the A series lens for only $65. In retrospect though I probably should have kept the M series as well. John - Original Message - From: "Steve Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 6:33 AM Subject: Re: Fair price on SMC-A 50/1.4? > Hi Bill, > $109 is a good price, I paid more than that on ebay for mine. I would keep > the other lenses, a camera shop is not going to give you diddly for them. > Sell > them on ebay if you have to. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Lens offer; Anyone bought from this guy?
Same with me...I believe I bought a copy of manuals from him, photocopy type for an ME Super and an AF200T...no problems with the transaction, but again, these were minor cost items. John - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 3:14 PM Subject: Re: Lens offer; Anyone bought from this guy? > Stan Tamulevich definitely rings a bell.. I know I bought something from > him, but it was ages ago and cant remember what? at any rate, its *not* > a red button, the name rings positive to me... > > Daphne > > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Info on Pentax SMC-F 28-80/3.5-4.5
I picked up my 70-210 used off KEH. My 28-70 was purchased new but it did not come with a hood. However, I believe the Pentax brand hoods for both these lenses are just expensive versions of the cheap rubber hoodscheck Boz's site. He has info on all the hoods for every lens, along with the coding to tell you what type of hood each one is. But, if I remember correctly, if there is an RH in Pentax's hood codes, that mean rubber hood. I do not believe the slower and less costly lenses typical come with hoods, at least not from Pentax. Generally, hoods with a lens seem reserved for the f/2.8 lenses, long teles (built in usually) and perhaps some of the more upper end lenses (i.e. Limited). - Original Message - From: Paul Jones To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 12:26 AM Subject: Re: Info on Pentax SMC-F 28-80/3.5-4.5 John, Did your F28-80 or F70-210 come with a lense hood? I have never had an original one for my F70-210 and have just been using one of those colapsable rubber hoods. Wouldnt mind getting and original one if they came with one. Thanks - Original Message - From: John Glover To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 4:52 PM Subject: Re: Info on Pentax SMC-F 28-80/3.5-4.5 Yes, it will make a nice companion to your F70-210, another terrific lens. I've got the FA28-70/4 as I said earlier but also have the F35-70 as the companion to my F70-210. Those two zooms plus an F 50/1.7 make up my kit for my SF-10. I had thought about the F28-80 as another option but decided to stick with the 35-70 as the flash coverage on my SF-10 is only good to 35mm. I suppose I wanted to keep my F series lenses and SF body in historical perspective, plus I've already got 28mm covered! John PS -- If you're interested, KEH has several 28-70/4AL's on their website right now - Original Message - From: Paul Jones To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 11:26 PM Subject: Re: Info on Pentax SMC-F 28-80/3.5-4.5 Great, thanks for the info. I think i'll pick the one up that i have my eye on :) on www.photodo.com it gets the same rating as the FA Zoom 28-70/4 AL. Not bad, but i'd still prefer the 28-70/4 AL IT should make a good companion for my F 70-210/4-5.6.
Re: MZ-S hands on (DOF preview)!
I prefer electronic DOF preview myself. My PZ-1p has mechanical and if you are shooting in Av or program mode, you have to manually move the aperture ring off the A setting to get the mechanical DOF preview to function. With electronic DOF, just touch a button and the lens stops down regardless of where the aperture ring is set. John - Original Message - From: "Paul Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 11:30 PM Subject: Re: MZ-S hands on (DOF preview)! > How good is a electronic DOF preview is comparison to the standard > mechanical type like on the Super Program and LX? > > Thanks > > - Original Message - > From: "David A. Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 3:47 PM > Subject: Re: MZ-S hands on! > > > > Tom Rittenhouse writes: > > > > > Digital displays, but all the usual > > > functions can be controlled by simple knobs and one shot > > > buttons, no hold button A, swear at button B while pressing > > > button B three times, thank god. There are 19 custom functions > > > that you probably need the manual for, but any normal picture > > > taking should be quite intuitive. > > > > I can't wait to handle the camera for myself to get a feel for the > controls. I > > really like the interface of the Z-1p although the left-hand dial is a > little > > cumbersome. I especially noticed that while trying to set flash > > compensation with a 400/5.6 lens hanging off the front, a procedure that > > almost requires three hands. > > > > > I forgot to check for mirror lock up (something I seldom use), > > > > I've seen the 2-second prefire mentioned, I would prefer a real MLU but > I'd > > want it to be done mechanically so the batteries don't get drained while > > waiting for the wind to settle. I am really pleased about the electronic > DOF > > preview though. > > > > > The mode selection is almost transparent. Touch a green button > > > convenient to your index finger and it goes into program mode. > > > > Like the "IF" button on the Z-1p but in a more convenient place? I still > need > > to actually start remembering which button is which without having to look > at > > them :) > > > > > Set the f-stop on the lens it automatically goes into aperture > > > priority. Set the shutter speed manually it goes into shutter > > > priority. Set both and it goes into manual. Touch the green > > > button again and it's back into program mode. > > > > Can you simultaneously set both the aperture and shutter speed from the > > body? My impression from the body photos is that there is only one wheel > > available for controlling exposure, unlike the Z-1p which has two. > > > > > Exposure comp is 1/2 stops, slide shooters will not be happy > > > with that. > > > > I shoot slides and have my camera set to 1/2-stops (even though I have > the > > option of 1/3). I'm not critical enough to care about the 1/6 stop > difference > > between the 1/3 - 1/2 and 1/2 - 2/3 points. > > > > > I would have to > > > shoot some film to find out how well the rather strange > > > autofocus point layout works. The camera automatically selects > > > the point, but you can override it if you think it is wrong. > > > > That's something else I'd like to play with. I must hassle the importers > to > > get one into the country, even though the money for it is budgeted for a > > certain 4x5 that speaks to me from the secondhand shelf every time I'm in > > the shop :) > > > > > The 24-90 zoom is variable f-stop, I don't like that. > > > > It's a zoom; I don't like that ;) Honestly though, 24-90 is a very very > nice > > range. Darnit, now I've realised that I don't have anything between 50 > and > > 100mm. Maybe I will have to start saving for the 77mm as well as the 43mm > > (must resist zooms...). > > > > > He says it replaces the 28-70/f4, sad. I > > > would call it an upgrade to the 28-80 myself. > > > > I would hope it's an upgrade to the 28-80. I did not like the feel of > that lens. > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > - Dave > > > > David A. Mann, B.E. > > email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ > > > > "Why is it that if an adult behaves like a child they lock him up, > > while children are allowed to run free on the streets?" -- Garfield > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > > > > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Info on Pentax SMC-F 28-80/3.5-4.5
Yes, it will make a nice companion to your F70-210, another terrific lens. I've got the FA28-70/4 as I said earlier but also have the F35-70 as the companion to my F70-210. Those two zooms plus an F 50/1.7 make up my kit for my SF-10. I had thought about the F28-80 as another option but decided to stick with the 35-70 as the flash coverage on my SF-10 is only good to 35mm. I suppose I wanted to keep my F series lenses and SF body in historical perspective, plus I've already got 28mm covered! John PS -- If you're interested, KEH has several 28-70/4AL's on their website right now - Original Message - From: Paul Jones To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 11:26 PM Subject: Re: Info on Pentax SMC-F 28-80/3.5-4.5 Great, thanks for the info. I think i'll pick the one up that i have my eye on :) on www.photodo.com it gets the same rating as the FA Zoom 28-70/4 AL. Not bad, but i'd still prefer the 28-70/4 AL IT should make a good companion for my F 70-210/4-5.6.
Re: Info on Pentax SMC-F 28-80/3.5-4.5
From what I understand, the SMC-F 28-80 is supposed to be a pretty decent performer. If you check Photodo.com, it get relatively high marks. The Takumar-F version is a lesser lens, with not quite as good a contrast or sharpness. Yes, the Takumar version is the non-SMC. The power zoom is the SMC-FA 28-80/3.5-4.7. It has a tiny bit smaller maximum aperture at 80mm. A lot of people knock this lens, basically due to its build quality, but the one I owned had excellent optics, it was just too heavy for my tastes. Plus, I never really used the power zoom feature at all, and when the 28-70/4 went down in price, I got one of those instead. I believe there is also a newer FA-28-80, available in both a silver and a black version, but I've not heard much favorable about the lens, just a few postings indicating it was a fairly standard performing lens. John - Original Message - From: Paul Jones To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 7:08 PM Subject: Re: Info on Pentax SMC-F 28-80/3.5-4.5 Hi, thanks for both the replys i got. Would the non SMC be a takumar and would the power zoom one be an FA as apposed to the F? Just curious
Re: Date backs
Or for safety inspection, environmental compliance audits, etc..shows your not only who and what, but also when... John - Original Message - From: "Len Paris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 3:57 AM Subject: RE: Date backs > If you've ever worked as a private detective, it's also great > for evidence shots where you want to show when people were at > specific places. Divorce cases come to mind. > > Len > --- > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > martin tammer > > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 11:15 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Date backs > > > > > > Any real benefit to having a date back - particularly > > one for a ZX-10, and is it worth the extra bucks? > > Thnx - Martin > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 > > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. > > To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. > > Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > > > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: NINE dang Texans?
Yeah Mike, but you know them Texanswith those egos, they probably counted each other twice! I wonder who that half-Texan is. John - Original Message - From: "Mike Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 7:34 PM Subject: NINE dang Texans? > So, basically, we have more Texans around here than anything else. > > I'm gonna have to rethink this. > > > > --Mike > > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Ergonomics
Did you try the ZX-M with the battery grip? Without it, it is a pretty smallish thing but the grip makes the camera MUCH more manageable. John - Original Message - From: "D. Glenn Arthur Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 8:19 PM Subject: RE: Ergonomics > down (but lacked the funds to walk out with it). I held something > recent-ish, I think it was a ZX-M, once in a store and found there > wasn't enough of it to hold onto comfortably. Ick. And I'd been > so prepared to love it, too, from what I'd read about it. (Note - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Geography
North Island or South Island? I know where the North Island is but haven't a clue as to where that South Island might be.:) John - Original Message - From: "petit miam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 8:34 PM Subject: RE: Geography > How many of you know where New Zealand is? And no, it > is not part of Australia (if you know where that is). > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Z-1p: batteries
Where did you find this price? I just went to www.costco.com and did a search for batteries. The only 2CR5's I could find were Energizer e2's, at $7.29 a piece.. Could you post the link to this price? Thanks! John - Original Message - From: "Vadim Meleshuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 3:36 PM Subject: Re: Z-1p: batteries > Hey, the 2CR5 battaries are real cheap: costco.com sells them for something > like US12.99 per 6 of them. That is 2.17 a battery. I don't see much > potential economy in using AAs. I had some funny problems with ordering from > Costco, though: first time they sent me CR5 battaries instead, second time I > got one box of 2CR5 and one box of forgot what other battaries, but they > were twice more expensive than 2CR5. Had to drive to the local Costco to > return them. > > Vadim Meleshuk. > > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p?
If you're speaking about the PZ-1p, the two large camera stores here in the Chicago area stock the body, and most of the other smaller stores, if they have a knowledgeable staff, can get one. I've found it's the chain type camera stores (i.e. Ritz, Wolf, etc.) whose sales staff is basically ignorant about nay Pentax product except the ZX-30/50. As far as marketing goes, I really do not remember much at all about the PZ-1p when it was first introduced as I was still shooting manual focus back then and did not keep up much on the AF stuff. However, in recent years, I do not think I've ever seen an actual Pentax ad for the PZ-1p. Almost all Pentax's marketing is geared towards the ZX series of cameras and their P&S's. John - Original Message - From: "herbet brasileiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 9:21 PM Subject: Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p? > --- Alan Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But then what caused the Z-1p sells a lot cheaper in > > the first place? Just > > curious. > > BAD marketing strategy perhaps. I'd never heard of it > before joining the list. Wasn't until a few months ago > that it was finally listed on the Pentax Canada > website. Most of the stores do not carry or even heard > about the camera. > How extensivelly it was advertised throughout Europe > and the US? - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
