Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-28 Thread Shel Belinkoff

Hi Jim ...

From some of the private mail I received, it seems there is no
majority.  There were quite a few suggestions g

Jim Moniz wrote:
 
 I guess I might be in the minority here, but I actually like the cropped one
 a little better.  The rest of the people and chairs balance it nicely.

-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-26 Thread Bob Walkden

Hi,

I prefer the uncropped version because the woman is positioned more
closely to a 3rd. The cropped version is somewhat unbalanced. Unfortunately
the bright white behind her head is on the 3rd. White always drags the eye
towards it, and with it being bang on the 3rd it is rather distracting. It
might pay to tone it down a little.

---

 Bob  

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thursday, October 25, 2001, 9:27:11 PM, you wrote:

 I borrowed a scanner yesterday and offer these two rough scans for your
 enjoyment:

 http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/applying_lipstick.jpg
 http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/applying_lipstick_crop1.jpg

 Comments are welcome.  
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-26 Thread Shel Belinkoff

Hi ...

You're right about the white light. There was little I could about it do
wrt to exposure and development to tone it down.  Less development would
have muddied the print even more and ruined what little contrast there
is between the woman's collar and her face and sweater.  Had the print
been made in the darkroom I'd have burned that area a bit.  PS 6.0 has a
feature that will allow dodging and burning, and even the scanner may
have a way to set the levels. Of course, I don't know how to do that
yet, but learning is just a matter of time.  Your comment is right on
the money.

BTW, the film used for this shot is TX ... compare the grain structure
of the current TX with that of the older TX in the photo of April.  The
developers used were similar, but the newer TX seems to have a finer,
smoother grain pattern without losing accutance, and a smoother
tonality.  It may just be that my poorer skills in the early days
contributed to the grain difference ...

Bob Walkden wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I prefer the uncropped version because the woman is positioned more
 closely to a 3rd. The cropped version is somewhat unbalanced. Unfortunately
 the bright white behind her head is on the 3rd. White always drags the eye
 towards it, and with it being bang on the 3rd it is rather distracting. It
 might pay to tone it down a little.

-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread Shel Belinkoff

I borrowed a scanner yesterday and offer these two rough scans for your
enjoyment:

http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/applying_lipstick.jpg
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/applying_lipstick_crop1.jpg

Comments are welcome.  
-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread Ken Archer

Details?

On Thursday 25 October 2001 15:27, you wrote:
 I borrowed a scanner yesterday and offer these two rough scans for
 your enjoyment:

 http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/applying_lipstick.jpg
 http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/applying_lipstick_crop1.jpg

 Comments are welcome.

-- 
Kenneth Archer + San Antonio, Texas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   ICQ #24980801
Powered by Linux ++ Mailed by Kmail
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread Juan J. Buhler

On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Shel Belinkoff wrote:

 and was saved in Photoshop format.  Later, using PS 6.0, I brought up
 the picture, sized it, and adjusted the contrast and brightness.  I
 don't know how to use any other commands or tools yet.  

Shel,

It's better to never use brightness/contrast, and instead adjust
levels and curves. Next time you get a chance with Photoshop, try
ctrl-L to bring up the levels adjustment window. You'll see the
histogram, so you'll be able to optimize the use of the dynamic range
without blowing up highlights or shadows. All you have to do is move
the ends in the input part so they encompass the part of the
histogram that has data.

If you need even finer control, CTRL-M will bring up the curves
window. Here you can draw a transfer curve to transform the greys in
your image. For example, you could increase the contrast of the
highlights while keeping the shadows about the same, or any
combination of things.

Those two are the controls you'll be using 98% of the time when
working in Photoshop in BW.

Also, if your scanner program lets you save a 16 bit image, you'll
always have the original scanned data, maybe you want to save that way
and do all the tweaking at home.

In any case, it looks like your use of brighness/contrast did anything
bad to your image, but it's always good to know for sure.

j

PS: I also like the uncropped version better. However, it looks like
she's looking at you but hasn't yet reacted at you pointing a camera
at her. Did you take another picture, say, one second or two later?

--
---
 Juan J. Buhler | Sr. FX Animator @ PDI | Photos at http://www.jbuhler.com
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread Paul Jones

Hi Shel,

for some reason i assumed both sides had been cropped :)

Nice shot.

Paul
- Original Message - 
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: Applying Lipstick


 Sides?  Nope, just one side.
 
 It's amazing that three people have commented on the same photo and each
 sees something different g
 
 Paul Jones wrote:
 
  The sides are cropped on the cropped version.
 
 --
 Shel Belinkoff
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread lbparis

Well, I didn't download them both and do a side-by-side
comparison but maybe I will.  What I did see didn't show much,
if any, cropping, though.  I expected that you would tighten up
on the subject a lot more.  Remember, I'm a portrait/wedding
shooter and cropping evidently means something different to me
than it does to you.  This is not to say your viewpoint is
wrong, just that it's different from my viewpoint.  I thought
you had asked a trick question.  I should have known better.

Len
===

- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: Applying Lipstick


 Look again ...

 lbparis wrote:
 
  I can't see a nickel's worth of difference between the full
  picture and the cropped picture.

 --
 Shel Belinkoff
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To
unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread lbparis

OK, I downloaded them and did a side-by-side comparison.  Only a
little of the left side was cropped.  The half a guy on the
right side looks the same in both pictures and does absolutely
nothing for the composition of the picture.  But, once again,
it's only my opinion.  I hope that I'm entitled to it.

Len
---


- Original Message -
From: Paul Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: Applying Lipstick


 The sides are cropped on the cropped version.


 - Original Message -
 From: lbparis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 8:39 AM
 Subject: Re: Applying Lipstick


  I can't see a nickel's worth of difference between the full
  picture and the cropped picture.
 
  Len
  ---
 
   On Thursday 25 October 2001 15:27, you wrote:
 I borrowed a scanner yesterday and offer these two
rough
  scans for
 your enjoyment:


http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/applying_lipstick.jpg

 
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/applying_lipstick_crop1.jpg
  
   --
   Shel Belinkoff
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  -
  This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To
unsubscribe,
  go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
forget to
  visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To
unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.

Please take no offense, but she looks like the girl in the movie Natural Born 
Killers.

Good photo!

Maris

- Original Message - 
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:27 PM
Subject: Applying Lipstick


| I borrowed a scanner yesterday and offer these two rough scans for your
| enjoyment:
| 
| http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/applying_lipstick.jpg
| http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/applying_lipstick_crop1.jpg
| 
| Comments are welcome.  
| -- 
| Shel Belinkoff
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| -
| This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
| go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
| visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
| 
| 
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread Shel Belinkoff

Hi Len ...

There's about 15% of the image cropped from the left side.  Getting too
close would lose the story a bit, as the details of the waiting area
would be missing or reduced substantially.  Gotta have a sense of place,
ya know g.

lbparis wrote:
 
 Well, I didn't download them both and do a side-by-side
 comparison but maybe I will.  What I did see didn't show much,
 if any, cropping, though.  I expected that you would tighten up
 on the subject a lot more.  Remember, I'm a portrait/wedding
 shooter and cropping evidently means something different to me
 than it does to you.  This is not to say your viewpoint is
 wrong, just that it's different from my viewpoint.  I thought
 you had asked a trick question.  I should have known better.

-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread Ken Archer

I don't know if it is brilliance or dumb luck, but you did something 
right.  Thanks.

On Thursday 25 October 2001 17:51, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
 Hi Ken ...

 There's really very little that I can tell you that may be helpful,
 but here goes:

 The scanner was a Nikon LC4000, and the picture was scanned at
 4000dpi, and was saved in Photoshop format.  Later, using PS 6.0, I
 brought up the picture, sized it, and adjusted the contrast and
 brightness.  I don't know how to use any other commands or tools yet.
  The computer on which Photoshop is located has a terrible monitor,
 and gives me no real clue as to how the results might be, so I saved
 a couple of copies to a floppy disk and brought the pic to my other
 machine which has a small freeware program called Irfan.  The gamma
 was adjusted a scosh using Irfan, and that was that. IOW, I didn't
 really do much to it.

 FWIW, the film is Tri-X @ 400 developed in ID-11 1:1.  The camera was
 a Leica M3 and the lens was just a basic 50mm f/2.0 - although it's
 possible I used a very old 50mm/1.5.

 Ken Archer wrote:
  I like what I see from a quality standpoint
  and, since I am about to start scanning my
  own negs (color and bw) I want to know how
  you did it.

-- 
Kenneth Archer + San Antonio, Texas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   ICQ #24980801
Powered by Linux ++ Mailed by Kmail
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread Ken Archer

It must be art ;-)

On Thursday 25 October 2001 18:06, you wrote:
 It's amazing that three people have commented on the same photo and
 each sees something different g
-- 
Kenneth Archer + San Antonio, Texas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   ICQ #24980801
Powered by Linux ++ Mailed by Kmail
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.

Slhel - don't use contrast and brightness!

Use levels and curves.

Set your white point and your black point, either with the levels control or the 
curves control, and you can then use curves to adjust the contrast better within the 
image.  Contrast and Brightness shift EVERTHING - curves shift only what YOU want to 
shift.

If you don't want to read a lot, at least read Chapter 2 of Dan Margulis's 
Professional Photoshop 6 available online at 
http://www.ledet.com/margulis/PP6_Chapter2.pdf - it's written for color but the 
principles apply to BW images as well.

Maris

- Original Message - 
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: Applying Lipstick


| Hi Ken ...
| 
| There's really very little that I can tell you that may be helpful, but
| here goes:
| 
| The scanner was a Nikon LC4000, and the picture was scanned at 4000dpi,
| and was saved in Photoshop format.  Later, using PS 6.0, I brought up
| the picture, sized it, and adjusted the contrast and brightness.  I
| don't know how to use any other commands or tools yet.  The computer on
| which Photoshop is located has a terrible monitor, and gives me no real
| clue as to how the results might be, so I saved a couple of copies to a
| floppy disk and brought the pic to my other machine which has a small
| freeware program called Irfan.  The gamma was adjusted a scosh using
| Irfan, and that was that. IOW, I didn't really do much to it.
| 
| FWIW, the film is Tri-X @ 400 developed in ID-11 1:1.  The camera was a
| Leica M3 and the lens was just a basic 50mm f/2.0 - although it's
| possible I used a very old 50mm/1.5.
| 
| Ken Archer wrote:
|  
|  I like what I see from a quality standpoint 
|  and, since I am about to start scanning my 
|  own negs (color and bw) I want to know how 
|  you did it.
| 
| -- 
| Shel Belinkoff
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| -
| This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
| go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
| visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
| 
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread lbparis

Absolutely.  If we all agreed, that would suggest a problem in
itself.  By the way, I didn't criticize the picture at all.  All
I said was that, on first look, I didn't notice any cropping.
On closer inspection, I saw a bit of cropping on the left side,
not both sides.

I followed up with a crop of my own to Shel, privately, and
explained my viewpoint.  I don't expect everyone to have the
same point of view.  People don't see things the same way.  At
least I know I don't.

Len
---

- Original Message -
From: Ken Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: Applying Lipstick


 It must be art ;-)

 On Thursday 25 October 2001 18:06, you wrote:
  It's amazing that three people have commented on the same
photo and
  each sees something different g
 --
 Kenneth Archer + San Antonio, Texas
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   ICQ #24980801
 Powered by Linux ++ Mailed by Kmail
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To
unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread Shel Belinkoff

Hi Len ... Had I wanted wanted a tighter shot I'd have moved closer or
used a somewhat longer lens.  It would be unusual for me to crop that
much from a photo.  Of course, as a wedding photographer, the BG
probably want you to eliminate uncle Harry picking his nose in the
background, but for what I do, the ol' boy's finger up his nose would
make the photo vbg

lbparis wrote:
 
 Well, I didn't download them both and do a side-by-side
 comparison but maybe I will.  What I did see didn't show much,
 if any, cropping, though.  I expected that you would tighten up
 on the subject a lot more.  
-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread lbparis

I didn't see that.  There was just as much of the guy on the
right side (to my old eyes) in both pictures.  Perhaps it was
some sort of a browser error.

Len
---


- Original Message -
From: Paul Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: Applying Lipstick


 The sides are cropped on the cropped version.


 - Original Message -
 From: lbparis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 8:39 AM
 Subject: Re: Applying Lipstick


  I can't see a nickel's worth of difference between the full
  picture and the cropped picture.
 
  Len
  ---
 
   On Thursday 25 October 2001 15:27, you wrote:
 I borrowed a scanner yesterday and offer these two
rough
  scans for
 your enjoyment:


http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/applying_lipstick.jpg

 
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/applying_lipstick_crop1.jpg
  
   --
   Shel Belinkoff
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  -
  This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To
unsubscribe,
  go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
forget to
  visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To
unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread lbparis

That's what makes it interesting, lots of points of view.  It's
also why I only comment privately to folks' PUG submissions, and
then only on the ones I really like.  I don't expect many folks
to agree with me, and just because I would have done it
differently doesn't make it a bad picture.  I enjoyed the
subject of your picture and the technical skill in the exposure,
too.  I just have a different point of view.

Len



- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: Applying Lipstick


 Hi Len ... Had I wanted wanted a tighter shot I'd have moved
closer or
 used a somewhat longer lens.  It would be unusual for me to
crop that
 much from a photo.  Of course, as a wedding photographer, the
BG
 probably want you to eliminate uncle Harry picking his nose in
the
 background, but for what I do, the ol' boy's finger up his
nose would
 make the photo vbg

 lbparis wrote:
 
  Well, I didn't download them both and do a side-by-side
  comparison but maybe I will.  What I did see didn't show
much,
  if any, cropping, though.  I expected that you would tighten
up
  on the subject a lot more.
 --
 Shel Belinkoff
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To
unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread PAUL STENQUIST

Nice shots, Shel. The scans look quite good in this low res form. If I
were to ask for anything at all, I guess I'd like a bit more contrast,
but of course that's monitor dependent and a matter of personal taste as
well. Sometimes when I scan BW I do it as an RGB or convert it to RGB
once it's in PhotoShop. To convert to RGB in Photoshop, you just go to
the Image menu, pull down to mode and choose RGB. That will give you
more tools to work with. If I want the appearance of more contrast but
my whites are near the limit in terms of losing detail, I'll sometimes
go to adjust selective color under the image heading. In adjust
selective color, you can select black and pump the blacks up by a few
percentage points without affecting the whites. If you go to adjust
levels you can work the blacks, midtones, and whites individually with
the sliders. A little bit of time spent playing with these will give you
a feeling for what they do. And if you screw up, you can always go to
the history box and backtrack quite a few steps. (If the history box
isn't evident on your desktop, go to the Windows menu and select Show
History. When I've finished, I go to the Image menu, pull down to
mode and reselect grayscale. The more you play, the more you'll discover.
   By the way, did you ask the lipstick woman if you could shoot her? If
not, did she object? I'm always at a loss as to whether I should ask or
just shoot.
Paul

Shel Belinkoff wrote:
 
 Hi Ken ...
 
 There's really very little that I can tell you that may be helpful, but
 here goes:
 
 The scanner was a Nikon LC4000, and the picture was scanned at 4000dpi,
 and was saved in Photoshop format.  Later, using PS 6.0, I brought up
 the picture, sized it, and adjusted the contrast and brightness.  I
 don't know how to use any other commands or tools yet.  The computer on
 which Photoshop is located has a terrible monitor, and gives me no real
 clue as to how the results might be, so I saved a couple of copies to a
 floppy disk and brought the pic to my other machine which has a small
 freeware program called Irfan.  The gamma was adjusted a scosh using
 Irfan, and that was that. IOW, I didn't really do much to it.
 
 FWIW, the film is Tri-X @ 400 developed in ID-11 1:1.  The camera was a
 Leica M3 and the lens was just a basic 50mm f/2.0 - although it's
 possible I used a very old 50mm/1.5.
 
 Ken Archer wrote:
 
  I like what I see from a quality standpoint
  and, since I am about to start scanning my
  own negs (color and bw) I want to know how
  you did it.
 
 --
 Shel Belinkoff
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Applying Lipstick

2001-10-25 Thread lbparis

When I looked at your picture, I thought it looked like she was
applying her makeup in front of a two-way mirror and that you
were invisible to her.  Following this line, I thought that
tightening up the picture would emphasize, or enhance this
viewpoint.  My imagination would not let me see the girl doing
this without some sort of a mirror.  With no mirror for her to
be looking into, it just looked way too unnatural.  Girls don't
usually stand up and apply lipstick without being able to see
what they are doing, in this male's opinion.  This is probably
sexist in a way but I've just seen too many girls applying
lipstick while looking at their reflection in something.

Len
---


- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: Applying Lipstick


 Hi Len ...

 There's about 15% of the image cropped from the left side.
Getting too
 close would lose the story a bit, as the details of the
waiting area
 would be missing or reduced substantially.  Gotta have a sense
of place,
 ya know g.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .