During my absence ...
Some new terminology has been coined. What's with this MARK language? I need some context. Sincerely, Collin Brendemuehl http://kerygmainstitute.org He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose -- Jim Elliott -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: During my absence ...
Mark Roberts started collecting interesting snippets from PDML messages. Often items that may have made sense originally but sound a bit off when pulled out of context. Then he started publishing his collection on his web site at the end of each year. Then he included the collection as part of the PDML Annual Photobook. When list members spot what they think is a candidate for inclusion inThe List, and recognizing that Mark may not read every message, they submit their nomination by annotating a quote of the relevant passage with MARK. Which may or may not trigger a filter Mark may or may not have set on his email reader. stan On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote: Some new terminology has been coined. What's with this MARK language? I need some context. Sincerely, Collin Brendemuehl http://kerygmainstitute.org He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose -- Jim Elliott -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: During my absence ...
Mark Roberts started collecting interesting snippets from PDML messages. Often items that may have made sense originally but sound a bit off when pulled out of context. Then he started publishing his collection on his web site at the end of each year. Then he included the collection as part of the PDML Annual Photobook. When list members spot what they think is a candidate for inclusion in The List, and recognizing that Mark may not read every message, they submit their nomination by annotating a quote of the relevant passage with MARK. Which may or may not trigger a filter Mark may or may not have set on his email reader. stan Enough to make a guy a little proud. Sniffle. Sincerely, Collin Brendemuehl http://kerygmainstitute.org He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose -- Jim Elliott -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: During my absence ...
Yeah but he gets a tad snippy if you MARK one that is too obviously something he would quote , something that is so obviously a gem. So then MARKing becomes a more subtle art. ann Stan Halpin wrote: Mark Roberts started collecting interesting snippets from PDML messages. Often items that may have made sense originally but sound a bit off when pulled out of context. Then he started publishing his collection on his web site at the end of each year. Then he included the collection as part of the PDML Annual Photobook. When list members spot what they think is a candidate for inclusion inThe List, and recognizing that Mark may not read every message, they submit their nomination by annotating a quote of the relevant passage with MARK. Which may or may not trigger a filter Mark may or may not have set on his email reader. stan On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote: Some new terminology has been coined. What's with this MARK language? I need some context. Sincerely, Collin Brendemuehl http://kerygmainstitute.org He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose -- Jim Elliott -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: During my absence ...
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote: So then MARKing becomes a more subtle art. That's what our cats always said, but I failed to appreciate the nuances. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: During my absence ...
Yeah but he gets a tad snippy if you MARK one that is too obviously something he would quote , something that is so obviously a gem. So then MARKing becomes a more subtle art. MARK! On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote: Yeah but he gets a tad snippy if you MARK one that is too obviously something he would quote , something that is so obviously a gem. So then MARKing becomes a more subtle art. ann Stan Halpin wrote: Mark Roberts started collecting interesting snippets from PDML messages. Often items that may have made sense originally but sound a bit off when pulled out of context. Then he started publishing his collection on his web site at the end of each year. Then he included the collection as part of the PDML Annual Photobook. When list members spot what they think is a candidate for inclusion inThe List, and recognizing that Mark may not read every message, they submit their nomination by annotating a quote of the relevant passage with MARK. Which may or may not trigger a filter Mark may or may not have set on his email reader. stan On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote: Some new terminology has been coined. What's with this MARK language? I need some context. Sincerely, Collin Brendemuehl http://kerygmainstitute.org He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose -- Jim Elliott -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: During my absence ...
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:36 -0400, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah but he gets a tad snippy if you MARK one that is too obviously something he would quote , something that is so obviously a gem. So then MARKing becomes a more subtle art. MARK! Speaking of which, would it not be more efficient to 'MARK' the subject line rather than burying 'MARK' within the body of a message that Mark may or may not read? BTW, an explanation of MARK (not Mark) can be found in the PDML FAQ: http://pug.komkon.org/general/mini-faq.html Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote: Yeah but he gets a tad snippy if you MARK one that is too obviously something he would quote , something that is so obviously a gem. So then MARKing becomes a more subtle art. ann Stan Halpin wrote: Mark Roberts started collecting interesting snippets from PDML messages. Often items that may have made sense originally but sound a bit off when pulled out of context. Then he started publishing his collection on his web site at the end of each year. Then he included the collection as part of the PDML Annual Photobook. When list members spot what they think is a candidate for inclusion inThe List, and recognizing that Mark may not read every message, they submit their nomination by annotating a quote of the relevant passage with MARK. Which may or may not trigger a filter Mark may or may not have set on his email reader. stan On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote: Some new terminology has been coined. What's with this MARK language? I need some context. Sincerely, Collin Brendemuehl http://kerygmainstitute.org He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose -- Jim Elliott -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and love email again -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: During my absence ...
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Brian Walters MARK! Speaking of which, would it not be more efficient to 'MARK' the subject line rather than burying 'MARK' within the body of a message that Mark may or may not read? where's the fun in that? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
