Re: Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

2003-03-28 Thread Jostein
Hi, Dag!
Welcome on board the list! :-)
Jostein

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!


 There may be some misunderstanding here somewhere.  BH claims under
the specifications of the *ist: Lens mount KAF2 (also KAF, KA  K
mounts usable)

 Perhaps there still is some hope...

 Dag

 
  Fra: Bojidar Dimitrov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  The prototypes that Pentax showed at PMA and CeBit fetured the
crippled
  mount, so there is a small chance that the *ist will not meter
properly
  with K and M lenses.  On the positive side, Pentax has loudly said
that
  the *ist D will fully support all lenses.
 
  Good luck with your decision.  It's not an easy one!
  Boz
 
 





Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

2003-03-28 Thread Roland Mabo
According to Pentax Scandinavia the *ist has a KAF mount (not KAF2) and in 
the user manual (which is translated and ready) they will only list KAF2 (no 
power zoom), KAF and KA lenses in the compatibility chart. Not K-mount.

The *ist D are going to have Pentax traditional K-mount compatibility. This 
is the goal of the technicians. The *ist D are probably not going to have a 
KAF2 mount, not KAF. Probably something else...

I expect to see USM and IS lenses, and two more bodies in the *ist serie, 
within the next 12 months.

The first *ist is the first model in a new serie which are going to replace 
the MZ-serie. (Pentax has promised that the *ist lineup will consist of 
three filmbased SLR's). It exist several rumours about those models, one is 
about a flagship with retro feel (to make LX users happy) and sealed design, 
another is about a mid market *ist and a third is about a junior *ist model. 
I don't believe in a junior model below the current *ist, because...

* The design of the *ist D is very filmlike. It looks like a filmbased 
camera. A digital doesn't have to loo like a filmbased camera, because they 
don't have a film chamber. This may suggest that Pentax took an existing 
design and based the *ist D around this.
* The flagship rumours are about a retro-designed camera, sort of an AF 
version of the classic LX. The design of the *ist D aren't retro at all.
* The design of the *ist D, with HyperModes and twin control dials, are more 
advanced than the current *ist, this hints to a new *ist model - between the 
current *ist and the upcoming flagship (which will replace the current MZ-S, 
the flagship may be an update to the current MZ-S).

Since the MZ-serie, the entry model in the serie has limited metering 
compatibility with lenses pre the A-serie from 1982 - so there's no surprise 
that the *ist has this too.

Best wishes,
Roland

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!
There may be some misunderstanding here somewhere.  BH claims under
the specifications of the *ist: Lens mount KAF2 (also KAF, KA  K
mounts usable)
Perhaps there still is some hope...


_




Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

2003-03-28 Thread Cotty
Steve,

I know it's tough, but my advice would be to hang fire. There are 2 very
good reasons.

1. The *ist D is tantalisingly close now, and not giving it a few more
months would be criminal - would you forgive yourself if you jumped to
Nikon and all the world was jumping on the *ist D. Could happen. Of
course I don't mean the entrenched N/C users, but this little *ist D
could just be the DSLR that will bring serious digital to the mass
market. Just depends on the pricing, and of course the reliability.

(Interruption - point of information, Boz sez:

If you can afford it, get the D100 now and be prepared to resell it
when  the Pentax DSLR is available and if it meets your needs.  If you
buy the D100 used, you will not lose much money reselling it.  If Pentax
somehow messes up the DSLR, well, then you have an alternative.

Thank you, Boz)

2. I disagree. Nikon are obviously going to replace the D100, but not
anytime real soon. This means that used D100 prices are still higher than
they will be at news of a successor. Once  a successor is announced, D100
prices will be cut in half. That might be later this year. Could be a
dicey time to buy a D100. Waiting for the *ist D will alleviate this.
Kill two birds with one stone.

OTOH, this business of delaying the *ist doesn't exactly inspire
confidence. I would bet you a pint of Fiddler's Elbow that the *ist D
won't be on the shelf until back-to-school time

OTOH, the D100 has seen a severe drop in new price since it was launched.
Bit by bit, it has slipped and slided 50 notes here, 25 notes there,
until it now resides firmly in Canon 10D land. Very astute of Nikon, and
very aggresively priced.

OTOH, the *ist D will take all your lovely lenses - must be worth waiting
for. The worst thing that coud happen would be to buy Nikon now, the *ist
D comes out, and you start fearing that you should have waited, then
panic sell the D100 at a terrible loss.

OTOH, --- as Tevye says in Fiddler On The Roof - - THERE IS NO OTHER HAND!

(Hey that's two fiddlers in one email - I nearly changed the beer for
something else just to avoid repetition, but heck, it's such a good beer,
and it's such a good musical, so who's complainin???)

Tough decision.

I would wait until the *ist D comes out since you have all these Pentax
lenses.  But you do have a situation.  Frankly,  I think I would have gone
Canon since Canon D30's and D60's are dropping in price as their users wait
for the upgrade - the 10D I think that's the model.

Not all their users are waiting for the upgrade, Jim. This user certainly
is not. I am more than happy to stick. I note that I can trade in a D60
and 500 GBP for a 10D but frankly I wouldn't be tempted if it were a
direct swap. Can't put my finger on why. It's worked beautifully since
new, the ergonomics are superb for my hands, the controls fall easily to
hand (they have changed on the 10D and I can't see the logic in it,
Spock), the polycarbonate body is very sturdy, no creaks or groans,
everything works and works well, just simply love the camera as a piece
of design - don't like the bulbous rounded looks of the 10D

...oh yeah, I've been using it nearly 6 months and never had a problem
with dust on the sensor - and boy you wanna see dust? We shovel it out by
the dump-truck load. I use a broom to get the cat hair off my desk.
Actually, a good blow is all you need (as the actress said to the bishop)
with a rubber blower down the neck - dust on the sensor is highly
overrated IMO. *ist D buyers take note. You won't have a problem.

So, far from being caught up in the 'must upgrade' hype, I am quite a few
years away from ditching a reliable and robust camera. Just like I was
back in the 80s when I bought an MX. A couple of years later, did I
upgrade? No - I bought another MX. Heck, when the shoe fits...

Chuntering again,

Cotty

_
Oh swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/
_




Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

2003-03-28 Thread Dag T
Hi Jostein!

Its your fault :-)

Dag

På fredag, 28. mars 2003, kl. 15:40, skrev Jostein:

Hi, Dag!
Welcome on board the list! :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

There may be some misunderstanding here somewhere.  BH claims under
the specifications of the *ist: Lens mount KAF2 (also KAF, KA  K
mounts usable)
Perhaps there still is some hope...

Dag

Fra: Bojidar Dimitrov [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The prototypes that Pentax showed at PMA and CeBit fetured the
crippled
mount, so there is a small chance that the *ist will not meter
properly
with K and M lenses.  On the positive side, Pentax has loudly said
that
the *ist D will fully support all lenses.

Good luck with your decision.  It's not an easy one!
Boz







Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

2003-03-28 Thread Steve Pearson
I probably will wait until the *ist D is available. 
But 3 things concern me.

1.  Nikon's D100 is now ahead of the *ist D in terms
of a learning curve-ie bugs, firmware updates, etc. 
Will the *ist D be perfect out of the box?  I highly
doubt it, but I guess that's the price you pay to wait
for it.

2.  Nikon now has a line of internal focussing 
vibration reduction lenses-Pentax???

3.  Price.  I can now buy a D100 for around $1500, use
my AMEX buyer's guarantee program to price match down
another $250, making my final purchase price $1250. 
Will the *ist D be in that price range?  


Thanks for the encouragement.  It's getting harder
every day that I see the D100 prices drop!




--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Steve,
 
 I know it's tough, but my advice would be to hang
 fire. There are 2 very
 good reasons.
 
 1. The *ist D is tantalisingly close now, and not
 giving it a few more
 months would be criminal - would you forgive
 yourself if you jumped to
 Nikon and all the world was jumping on the *ist D.
 Could happen. Of
 course I don't mean the entrenched N/C users, but
 this little *ist D
 could just be the DSLR that will bring serious
 digital to the mass
 market. Just depends on the pricing, and of course
 the reliability.
 
 (Interruption - point of information, Boz sez:
 
 If you can afford it, get the D100 now and be
 prepared to resell it
 when  the Pentax DSLR is available and if it meets
 your needs.  If you
 buy the D100 used, you will not lose much money
 reselling it.  If Pentax
 somehow messes up the DSLR, well, then you have an
 alternative.
 
 Thank you, Boz)
 
 2. I disagree. Nikon are obviously going to replace
 the D100, but not
 anytime real soon. This means that used D100 prices
 are still higher than
 they will be at news of a successor. Once  a
 successor is announced, D100
 prices will be cut in half. That might be later this
 year. Could be a
 dicey time to buy a D100. Waiting for the *ist D
 will alleviate this.
 Kill two birds with one stone.
 
 OTOH, this business of delaying the *ist doesn't
 exactly inspire
 confidence. I would bet you a pint of Fiddler's
 Elbow that the *ist D
 won't be on the shelf until back-to-school time
 
 OTOH, the D100 has seen a severe drop in new price
 since it was launched.
 Bit by bit, it has slipped and slided 50 notes here,
 25 notes there,
 until it now resides firmly in Canon 10D land. Very
 astute of Nikon, and
 very aggresively priced.
 
 OTOH, the *ist D will take all your lovely lenses -
 must be worth waiting
 for. The worst thing that coud happen would be to
 buy Nikon now, the *ist
 D comes out, and you start fearing that you should
 have waited, then
 panic sell the D100 at a terrible loss.
 
 OTOH, --- as Tevye says in Fiddler On The Roof - -
 THERE IS NO OTHER HAND!
 
 (Hey that's two fiddlers in one email - I nearly
 changed the beer for
 something else just to avoid repetition, but heck,
 it's such a good beer,
 and it's such a good musical, so who's
 complainin???)
 
 Tough decision.
 
 I would wait until the *ist D comes out since you
 have all these Pentax
 lenses.  But you do have a situation.  Frankly,  I
 think I would have gone
 Canon since Canon D30's and D60's are dropping in
 price as their users wait
 for the upgrade - the 10D I think that's the model.
 
 Not all their users are waiting for the upgrade,
 Jim. This user certainly
 is not. I am more than happy to stick. I note that I
 can trade in a D60
 and 500 GBP for a 10D but frankly I wouldn't be
 tempted if it were a
 direct swap. Can't put my finger on why. It's worked
 beautifully since
 new, the ergonomics are superb for my hands, the
 controls fall easily to
 hand (they have changed on the 10D and I can't see
 the logic in it,
 Spock), the polycarbonate body is very sturdy, no
 creaks or groans,
 everything works and works well, just simply love
 the camera as a piece
 of design - don't like the bulbous rounded looks of
 the 10D
 
 ...oh yeah, I've been using it nearly 6 months and
 never had a problem
 with dust on the sensor - and boy you wanna see
 dust? We shovel it out by
 the dump-truck load. I use a broom to get the cat
 hair off my desk.
 Actually, a good blow is all you need (as the
 actress said to the bishop)
 with a rubber blower down the neck - dust on the
 sensor is highly
 overrated IMO. *ist D buyers take note. You won't
 have a problem.
 
 So, far from being caught up in the 'must upgrade'
 hype, I am quite a few
 years away from ditching a reliable and robust
 camera. Just like I was
 back in the 80s when I bought an MX. A couple of
 years later, did I
 upgrade? No - I bought another MX. Heck, when the
 shoe fits...
 
 Chuntering again,
 
 Cotty
 
 _
 Oh swipe me! He paints with light!
 http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps
 _
 Free UK Mac Classified Ads at
 http://www.macads.co.uk/
 _
 
 


__
Do you 

Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

2003-03-28 Thread Bruce Rubenstein
That new 24-120 AF-S, VR looks like a killer general purpose lens. But 
hey, Roland says Pentax will have all that good stuff in a year.

BR

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

2.  Nikon now has a line of internal focussing 
vibration reduction lenses-Pentax???
 





Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

2003-03-28 Thread Cotty
Thanks for the encouragement.  It's getting harder
every day that I see the D100 prices drop!

Amen to that, brother!

_
Oh swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/
_




Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

2003-03-28 Thread Cotty
If believe the Canon 10D release came as a surprise for Nikon, especially 
the price. It seems like the Canon is the better camera, in terms of image 
quality. Well, it should be - it uses newer technology. And the *ist D, when 
it comes out in the summer or late summer, will have even newer technology.

I would say that the technologies are different, but I would hesitate to
say that one was better over the other. CCD vs CMOS. Each has strengths
and weaknesses.

Cot

_
Oh swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/
_




Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

2003-03-28 Thread Mark Roberts
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I would say that the technologies are different, but I would hesitate to
say that one was better over the other. CCD vs CMOS. Each has strengths
and weaknesses.

Here's a pretty good summary from a company that makes both:
http://www.dalsa.com/markets/ccd_vs_cmos.asp

-- 
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com



Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

2003-03-28 Thread Rob Studdert
On 28 Mar 2003 at 16:14, Roland Mabo wrote:

 I expect to see USM and IS lenses, and two more bodies in the *ist serie, 
 within the next 12 months.
 
 The first *ist is the first model in a new serie which are going to replace the
 MZ-serie. (Pentax has promised that the *ist lineup will consist of three
 filmbased SLR's). It exist several rumours about those models, one is about a
 flagship with retro feel (to make LX users happy) and sealed design, another is
 about a mid market *ist and a third is about a junior *ist model. I don't
 believe in a junior model below the current *ist, because...

Where did you get all this info? If it was confirmed I'd be pretty positive, 
however...

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
Pentax user since 1986 PDMLer since 1998



Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

2003-03-28 Thread Rob Studdert
On 28 Mar 2003 at 15:57, Mark Roberts wrote:

 Here's a pretty good summary from a company that makes both:
 http://www.dalsa.com/markets/ccd_vs_cmos.asp

It seems a little dated?

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
Pentax user since 1986 PDMLer since 1998



Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

2003-03-28 Thread Bruce Rubenstein
It isn't info. It's in the realm of, The Little Engine That Could: I 
think I can, I think I can, I think I can. Or maybe it was the Wizard 
of OZ: I do believe, I do believe, I do believe. Better stop here 
before I step on someone's religious trip wire.

BR

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 28 Mar 2003 at 16:14, Roland Mabo wrote:

 

I expect to see USM and IS lenses, 

Where did you get all this info? If it was confirmed I'd be pretty positive, 
however...

 





My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

2003-03-27 Thread Steve Pearson
Well, here's my delima.  A few months ago I purchased
a Nikon N80, with the new 24-85 G lens and the new
SB80 flash.  Since then, I have also acquired a 70-210
4.5/5.6D lens.  Nothing great, but the 24-85 is a nice
lens.  Main use is for the autofocus and flash
abilities for my kids' sports, portraits, etc.

My Pentax stuff is numerous.  With a Super Program, MX
(no auto focus bodies), and all the prime lenses. 
Recent acquisitions include the rare SMC-M 120, SMC-A
24, 28 3.5, and the 35 3.5, to go along with a 135
3.5, SMC-A 100 2.8.  You see my pain?

My delima-wait for the *ist D, or switch to the Nikon
D100?  

The *ist D seems like it won't be available until late
July/August.   I have a trip to Hawaii end of April,
and a trip to Orlando in May.  

I'm really having a hard time convincing myself to
wait for the *ist D.  But, I hate to give up these
GREAT lenses, that would cost a fortune to replace
with Nikon!

Which way should I go???

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com



Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

2003-03-27 Thread Bruce Rubenstein
It's going to hurt which ever way you go, because of the focal length 
multiplication factor with either DSLR. Shoot film for one last summer. 
If you add a 50/1.8 to your Nikon kit that's all you would need for 
Orlando (leave the SB-80 home). Take the Pentax to Hawaii. Figure 
digital out in the fall.

BR

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Well, here's my delima.  A few months ago I purchased
a Nikon N80, with the new 24-85 G lens and the new
SB80 flash.  Since then, I have also acquired a 70-210
4.5/5.6D lens.  Nothing great, but the 24-85 is a nice
lens.  Main use is for the autofocus and flash
abilities for my kids' sports, portraits, etc.
My Pentax stuff is numerous.  With a Super Program, MX
(no auto focus bodies), and all the prime lenses. 
Recent acquisitions include the rare SMC-M 120, SMC-A
24, 28 3.5, and the 35 3.5, to go along with a 135
3.5, SMC-A 100 2.8.  You see my pain?

My delima-wait for the *ist D, or switch to the Nikon
D100?  

The *ist D seems like it won't be available until late
July/August.   I have a trip to Hawaii end of April,
and a trip to Orlando in May.  

I'm really having a hard time convincing myself to
wait for the *ist D.  But, I hate to give up these
GREAT lenses, that would cost a fortune to replace
with Nikon!
Which way should I go???

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com
 





Re: My fork in the road-tell me which way to go!

2003-03-27 Thread Steve Pearson
Bruce,

That is pretty good advice.  Actually, the Hawaii trip
is more of a MF trip, i.e. no kids.  Disneyworld would
be the AF trip.  I think in the end, for my shooting,
the focal length will be just fine (starting out at
36mm) for a digital SLR.  I'm just so tired of the
time delay, wasted photos, etc. with film.  Digital is
the future!  Especially seeing the enlargement
capabilities of a 6MP digital SLR.  




--- Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It's going to hurt which ever way you go, because of
 the focal length 
 multiplication factor with either DSLR. Shoot film
 for one last summer. 
 If you add a 50/1.8 to your Nikon kit that's all you
 would need for 
 Orlando (leave the SB-80 home). Take the Pentax to
 Hawaii. Figure 
 digital out in the fall.
 
 BR
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Well, here's my delima.  A few months ago I
 purchased
 a Nikon N80, with the new 24-85 G lens and the new
 SB80 flash.  Since then, I have also acquired a
 70-210
 4.5/5.6D lens.  Nothing great, but the 24-85 is a
 nice
 lens.  Main use is for the autofocus and flash
 abilities for my kids' sports, portraits, etc.
 
 My Pentax stuff is numerous.  With a Super Program,
 MX
 (no auto focus bodies), and all the prime lenses. 
 Recent acquisitions include the rare SMC-M 120,
 SMC-A
 24, 28 3.5, and the 35 3.5, to go along with a 135
 3.5, SMC-A 100 2.8.  You see my pain?
 
 My delima-wait for the *ist D, or switch to the
 Nikon
 D100?  
 
 The *ist D seems like it won't be available until
 late
 July/August.   I have a trip to Hawaii end of
 April,
 and a trip to Orlando in May.  
 
 I'm really having a hard time convincing myself to
 wait for the *ist D.  But, I hate to give up these
 GREAT lenses, that would cost a fortune to replace
 with Nikon!
 
 Which way should I go???
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness,
 live on your desktop!
 http://platinum.yahoo.com
 
   
 
 
 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com