Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Great shot. The colours of the clothes, or lack therof:-), against the drab car work well. Tells a story it does.gLens seems decent enough. BTW this is were Celsius work better. It was only 38 here in To,g Dave The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Paul
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
It certainly is a good, crisp photo, which means that lens is fine performer. All kidding aside, it will do you well. Godfrey On Jun 25, 2005, at 2:11 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: It's the DA 50-200 of course. I'm very pleased with its performance. This shot is quite sharp at 100%. Perhaps i'll post a detail later. Paul On Jun 25, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Paul Stenquist wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Damn right that's not a street shot, it's a cheeky chippie shot. Hm. A CA 50-200 lens? A celebration of Chromatic Aberration? ;-) Godfrey Chairman, AOPSS
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Your absolutely right. It's not a street shot, it's a pretty girl shot. g And a very nice one at that. The second thing I was drawn to, is that you managed to catch a single drop of melted ice cream. For some weird reason I think that's pretty neat. Dave On 6/26/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Paul
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
David Savage wrote: The second thing I was drawn to, is that you managed to catch a single drop of melted ice cream. For some weird reason I think that's pretty neat. Paul, you could make full size a crop of the drop of melted ice cream so we can check that it really is one and the quality of the CA 50-200 lens @ 200mm f6.7 On 6/26/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Paul
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Will do. I was thinking the same thing. I also have a wide open shot (by chance of another young lady) that I'll upload soon. Paul On Jun 26, 2005, at 7:38 AM, Joaquim Carvalho wrote: David Savage wrote: The second thing I was drawn to, is that you managed to catch a single drop of melted ice cream. For some weird reason I think that's pretty neat. Paul, you could make full size a crop of the drop of melted ice cream so we can check that it really is one and the quality of the CA 50-200 lens @ 200mm f6.7 On 6/26/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Paul
PESO: Not a street shot :-)
The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Paul
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Paul Stenquist wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Paul And, two sets of keys... Yup. Choice indeed... You can tell the AF works just fine! keith whaley
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Paul Stenquist wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Damn right that's not a street shot, it's a cheeky chippie shot. Hm. A CA 50-200 lens? A celebration of Chromatic Aberration? ;-) Godfrey Chairman, AOPSS
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
It's the DA 50-200 of course. I'm very pleased with its performance. This shot is quite sharp at 100%. Perhaps i'll post a detail later. Paul On Jun 25, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Paul Stenquist wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Damn right that's not a street shot, it's a cheeky chippie shot. Hm. A CA 50-200 lens? A celebration of Chromatic Aberration? ;-) Godfrey Chairman, AOPSS
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
On 6/25/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Paul I don't much give a crap what it was shot with. OTOH, I don't give a crap if one wants to call it a street shot or not. I like it. Maybe I'm a pig (well, I guess there's not much doubt about that, really), but I like a pic of a good looking woman. And, this is one. Nice grab, Paul. You got her mid-lick. vbg cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Hello Paul, Keep showing us shots from that new lens. I am quite anxious to see how well it performs wide open at different focal lengths. Like the shot BTW! -- Best regards, Bruce Saturday, June 25, 2005, 12:38:57 PM, you wrote: PS The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two PS ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it PS was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order PS of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, PS 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. PS http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 PS Paul
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
On 6/25/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Paul Doesn't the Arcane Order also prescribe black white, preferably grainy? oh yeah, I really like the moment you've caught. and btw, YEA SPURS!!
RE: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
That's one hot babe! (I can tell by the way the ice cream's dripping) Nice shot Paul. Pretty handy little lens. Don -Original Message- From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 2:39 PM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: PESO: Not a street shot :-) The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Paul
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Spurs? What spurs? I have a selective memory :-). Thanks for the comment and the street photography tips :-)). Paul On Jun 25, 2005, at 6:52 PM, E.R.N. Reed wrote: On 6/25/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The mercury topped off in the high nineties (F of course) today, so two ice creams are allowed. By the way this is NOT a street shot because it was not taken with a focal length prescribed by the AOPSS (Arcane Order of Pretentious Street Shooters :-)). Seriously it's with the CA 50-200, 200mm, f6.7 @ 1/500, ISO 200, continuous autofocus. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3485327 Paul Doesn't the Arcane Order also prescribe black white, preferably grainy? oh yeah, I really like the moment you've caught. and btw, YEA SPURS!!
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
On 6/25/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't much give a crap what it was shot with. OTOH, I don't give a crap if one wants to call it a street shot or not. I like it. Maybe I'm a pig (well, I guess there's not much doubt about that, really), but I like a pic of a good looking woman. And, this is one. I'll second that! Nice photo, too. -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com -- You have to hold the button down -Arnold Newman
Re: PESO: Not a street shot :-)
Thanks Scott and Frank. I didn't see Frank's reply. I haven't been getting all the mail tonight. Paul On Jun 25, 2005, at 8:37 PM, Scott Loveless wrote: On 6/25/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't much give a crap what it was shot with. OTOH, I don't give a crap if one wants to call it a street shot or not. I like it. Maybe I'm a pig (well, I guess there's not much doubt about that, really), but I like a pic of a good looking woman. And, this is one. I'll second that! Nice photo, too. -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com -- You have to hold the button down -Arnold Newman
