Re: Best mid-speed 70/80-200/210 AF zoom?

2005-04-12 Thread Kostas Kavoussanakis
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Fred wrote:

 Among the f/2.8's, I really like the FA* 80-200/2.8 (what's not to like,
 except I would have preferred a one-touch zoom, but I know it's an AF lens,
 so...).

Heft. Judging from specs. I blame PZ :-)

 admiration of it.)  I find that the A 70-210/4 is better (unless maybe I
 just have a dud of an F lens) in all ways (except maybe in autofocus
 speed - g).

And heft, again. This time from handling one.

Kostas



RE: Best mid-speed 70/80-200/210 AF zoom?

2005-04-11 Thread Don Sanderson
William, (Is Bill OK or do you prefer William?)

I know you're not a zoom lover, actually neither am I.
I find that the quality of primes tend to make me look
on *most* zooms as rather inferior, though there are
a few exceptions.
Many of my photo opportunities are quick 'shoot from the
car' or 'jump out of the car and shoot'.
Since I'm usually on the clock at work when I do this I
can't take the time to zoom with my feet, a zoom lens
helps me fill frames without heavy cropping later.

A question for you: Do you usually find 150mm long enough?

I often carry the 200/4, I frequently wish it was a bit
longer.
I was carrying the 300/8.0 CAT but I just don't much care
for donuts. ;-)

Don


 -Original Message-
 From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 11:33 AM
 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
 Subject: Re: Best mid-speed 70/80-200/210 AF zoom?
 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Don Sanderson 
 Subject: Best mid-speed 70/80-200/210 AF zoom?
 
 
 
  
  **What is your favorite mid-range zoom?**
  
 
 I use an FA77/1.8 or an M150/3.5, and I zoom with my feet.
 
 
 William Robb
 



Re: Best mid-speed 70/80-200/210 AF zoom?

2005-04-11 Thread hdd
Vivitar Series 1 F2.8 70-210.

Quoting Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have several 70/80-200/210 zooms in the F/4-5.6 range for
autofocus.
All of them have their strengths and weaknesses.
Some are good at the short end and poor at the long end.
Others are just the opposite.
The ATX 80-200/2.8 is fantastic but it's large, heavy and
manual focus.
The F70-210/4-5.6 is good when it wants to be but I get
inconsistent results with it, both exposure and image quality
wise.
**What is your favorite mid-range zoom?**
TIA
Don






Re: Best mid-speed 70/80-200/210 AF zoom?

2005-04-11 Thread Fred
 Vivitar Series 1 F2.8 70-210.

. . . as in VS1 70-210/2.8-4 ?

Fred




Re: Best mid-speed 70/80-200/210 AF zoom?

2005-04-11 Thread hdd
Yes.
Quoting Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Vivitar Series 1 F2.8 70-210.
. . . as in VS1 70-210/2.8-4 ?
Fred






Re: Best mid-speed 70/80-200/210 AF zoom?

2005-04-11 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - 
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: RE: Best mid-speed 70/80-200/210 AF zoom?


William, (Is Bill OK or do you prefer William?)
HAR!!
Bill is fine.
I went with William when I signed on to try to differentiate myself from the 
half dozen other Bills on the list.

I know you're not a zoom lover, actually neither am I.
I find that the quality of primes tend to make me look
on *most* zooms as rather inferior, though there are
a few exceptions.
Many of my photo opportunities are quick 'shoot from the
car' or 'jump out of the car and shoot'.
Since I'm usually on the clock at work when I do this I
can't take the time to zoom with my feet, a zoom lens
helps me fill frames without heavy cropping later.
A question for you: Do you usually find 150mm long enough?
No.
My answer was somewhat tongue in cheek, although I rarely use zoom lenses.
I tend to run with a pack of primes from 15mm to 500mm, in the 80-200 range 
I use the 77 or 85, the 100 macro or K105, the M150 and the M200/4.
I do have an old Tokina 80-200/2.8 which I have started to become fond of on 
the istD, even though it lacks the A position.

I often carry the 200/4, I frequently wish it was a bit
longer.
I was carrying the 300/8.0 CAT but I just don't much care
for donuts. ;-)
Long lenses seem to be a bit of a problem on the digital. Neither my 300 or 
400 are as good on the istD as they are on film. hey both seem to have a bit 
more CA than I am able to correct in the RAW converter.

William Robb



Re: Best mid-speed 70/80-200/210 AF zoom?

2005-04-11 Thread Fred
 I have several 70/80-200/210 zooms in the F/4-5.6 range for
 autofocus.
 All of them have their strengths and weaknesses.
 Some are good at the short end and poor at the long end.
 Others are just the opposite.
 **What is your favorite mid-range zoom?**

I do have some experience with a few different 70/80-200/210 zooms, so I
thought I'd chime in with a few comments.

 The ATX 80-200/2.8 is fantastic but it's large, heavy and manual focus.

Among the f/2.8's, I really like the FA* 80-200/2.8 (what's not to like,
except I would have preferred a one-touch zoom, but I know it's an AF lens,
so...).  I also really like the ol' manual focus Tokina ATX 80-200/2.8
(which I'm reluctant to give up, even though I now have the FA*).  I don't
care as much for the autofocus ATX 80-200/2.8 (although, to be honest, I
have not used it as much as the others).  All three lenses do seem very
well built.  However, about as was said, all of these are big and heavy -
not exactly walking around lenses - g.  (Of course, the heavy goes
hand-in-hand with the well built.)  But, when you're short on photons...

 The F70-210/4-5.6 is good when it wants to be but I get inconsistent
 results with it, both exposure and image quality wise.

I still haven't gotten excited about the F 70-210/4-5.6.  (I know some
people love this lens, but I can say that there is not a universal
admiration of it.)  I find that the A 70-210/4 is better (unless maybe I
just have a dud of an F lens) in all ways (except maybe in autofocus
speed - g).  In fact, jumping directly to the bottom line question, the
A 70-210/4 is my favorite all-around flavor of the 70/80-200/210 zooms.

Among some of the 3rd-party models, I've used the five different VS1
70-210's:  The original VS1 70-210/3.5 is solid, but is not quite as sharp
as the second VS1 70-210/3.5 (which is optically identical, as far as I can
tell, to the Tokina 70-210/3.5), which I'd say is tied with the VS1
70-210/2.8-4.  The fourth and fifth VS1 70-210's (both f/2.8-4) are not as
good as their predecessors (although the Q-DOS version, i.e., the fifth
version, is a lot of fun to play with).

So, my bottom line choice for this category is still the A 70-210/4.

Fred




Re: Best mid-speed 70/80-200/210 AF zoom?

2005-04-10 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - 
From: Don Sanderson 
Subject: Best mid-speed 70/80-200/210 AF zoom?


**What is your favorite mid-range zoom?**
I use an FA77/1.8 or an M150/3.5, and I zoom with my feet.
William Robb


Re: Best mid-speed 70/80-200/210 AF zoom?

2005-04-10 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi!
I have several 70/80-200/210 zooms in the F/4-5.6 range for
autofocus.
All of them have their strengths and weaknesses.
Some are good at the short end and poor at the long end.
Others are just the opposite.
The ATX 80-200/2.8 is fantastic but it's large, heavy and
manual focus.
The F70-210/4-5.6 is good when it wants to be but I get
inconsistent results with it, both exposure and image quality
wise.
**What is your favorite mid-range zoom?**
Mine is the one that gives you inconsistent results. I find it quite 
excellent. I had Soligor 70-222/3.5 C/D that was very heavy. Though I 
don't think Soligor was sharper than Pentax... And it had this sandy 
bokeh - very odd...

I've seen Jostein's Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX that is huge compared to F70-210...
In fact, me so thinks that in mid-speed 70-200 zoom category you cannot 
get the lens that has no weaknesses. May be it would be a time for you 
to move to fast f2.8 glass... Or you can buy some primes in the focal 
lengths you use most...

Just my pennies.
Boris