Re: Enlarger Lens Coverage

2002-02-14 Thread William Robb

- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl
Subject: OT: Enlarger Lens Coverage


 Good news.
 The Fujinon 105/5.6 EP enlarging lens
 covers all but the very tips of a 4x5.
 Great lens.  Great contrast.

Aren't the Fujinons nice? I have both 50mm and 80mm Fujinons.
The 80mm covers the 6x7 negative quite nicely, and even the 50
is not too shy of covering it. I think it might cover the 645
format.
They are specatularly sharp and contrasty right to the edges as
well. Much more so that my Rodenstocks of the same focal
lengths.

William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Enlarger Lens Coverage

2002-02-14 Thread William Robb

Correction, The Fuji is a 90mm f/5.6 Fujinon. The Rodenstock is
an 80mm f/5.6.

William Robb
- Original Message -
From: William Robb
Subject: Re: Enlarger Lens Coverage


 - Original Message -
 From: Collin Brendemuehl
 Subject: OT: Enlarger Lens Coverage


  Good news.
  The Fujinon 105/5.6 EP enlarging lens
  covers all but the very tips of a 4x5.
  Great lens.  Great contrast.

 Aren't the Fujinons nice? I have both 50mm and 80mm Fujinons.
 The 80mm covers the 6x7 negative quite nicely, and even the 50
 is not too shy of covering it. I think it might cover the 645
 format.
 They are specatularly sharp and contrasty right to the edges
as
 well. Much more so that my Rodenstocks of the same focal
 lengths.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: Enlarger Lens Coverage

2002-02-14 Thread J. C. O'Connell

My 80mm Rodenstock F5.6 covered 6X7 no
problem when making 8X10 prints. But I
bought a 105mm 5.6 El-Nikkor just to be safe.
JCO
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Robb
 Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:24 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Enlarger Lens Coverage
 
 
 Correction, The Fuji is a 90mm f/5.6 Fujinon. The Rodenstock is
 an 80mm f/5.6.
 
 William Robb
 - Original Message -
 From: William Robb
 Subject: Re: Enlarger Lens Coverage
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Collin Brendemuehl
  Subject: OT: Enlarger Lens Coverage
 
 
   Good news.
   The Fujinon 105/5.6 EP enlarging lens
   covers all but the very tips of a 4x5.
   Great lens.  Great contrast.
 
  Aren't the Fujinons nice? I have both 50mm and 80mm Fujinons.
  The 80mm covers the 6x7 negative quite nicely, and even the 50
  is not too shy of covering it. I think it might cover the 645
  format.
  They are specatularly sharp and contrasty right to the edges
 as
  well. Much more so that my Rodenstocks of the same focal
  lengths.
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Enlarger Lens Coverage

2002-02-14 Thread William Robb

- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Enlarger Lens Coverage


 My 80mm Rodenstock F5.6 covered 6X7 no
 problem when making 8X10 prints. But I
 bought a 105mm 5.6 El-Nikkor just to be safe.

Mine does too, but I like the Fuji lens more. The Nikkor 105 is
a gem.

William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .